Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1989/02/08 - MINUTESi PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Council Chamber, City Hall February 8, 1989 1:30 p.m. ROLL CALL F-Y 1988 - 1989 Present Present Excused Absences Planning Commission This Meeting to Date to Date Larry Lapham, Chairman X 13 2 Gary Olsen X 12 3 Barbara Whitney X 11 4 Brent Hough X 13 2 Martha Edgmon - 13 2 Chris Mills X 12 1 Michael Dotson X 12 0 Staff Present Marvin D. Roos , Planning Director Siegfried Siefkes, Assistant City Attorney Amy Hodgett, Economic Development Coordinator Debra Goodwin, Planner Sherri Abbat ;-'Planner Tracy Gunneman, Rehabilation Specialist Douglas Evans , Planner Dean Lewis, Traffic Engineer Mary E. Lawler, Recording Secretary Architectural , Advisory Committee - February 6, 1989 Brent Hough, Chairman Absent: Mike Buccino Will Kleindienst William Johnson Reuel Young Tom Doczi Chairman called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. M/S/C (Olsen/Hough; Edgmon absent) approving minutes of January 25, 1989 with the following corrections: Page 3, TPM 22401. Add "Approved as submitted" . Page 4, CASE 3.0452. Before "program" delete "site" , add "sign" . Page 9, Paragraph 9, Case 5.0500/TTM 23938. First line delete "MIP"; add "M-1" . Page 11, TPM 23937, Paragraph 7. Change "prior" to "drive" . Page 15, Case 5.0032. Commissioner Dotson's comments in first paragraph should read that he would rather promote recycling because he had concerns about filling landfill sites. February 8, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 2 ADMINISTRATIVE NOTE: There were no Tribal Council comments. REPORT OF POSTING AGENDA: The February 8, 1989 agenda was available for public access at the City Hall exterior bulletin board and the Planning Division Counter by 1:30 p.m. , Friday, February 3, 1989. CONSENT ACTION AGENDA Approval of architectural cases is valid for two years. The approval granted must be exercised within that time period unless extended. M/S/C (Dotson/Hough; Edgmon absent) taking the following actions: CASE 3.0262 (Continued) . Application by ALEXANDER COLER for architectural approval of revised elevations for house at Patencio Road/O'Donnell Golf Course, R-1-A Zone, Section 15. Approved as submitted. CASE 3.0525 (MINOR). Application by STEVE JELINEK for architectural approval of �-- a guest house at 400 Ridge Road, R-1-C Zone, Section 27. Approved subject to the following condition: That the roof line be the same - either hip or gable - on the north and south sides of the guest house. CASE- 3.0519 (Reference 5.0032-PD-78) . Application by CANYON HEIGHTS VILLAS for architectural approval of revised site plan and elevations for condominium development on S. Palm Canyon Drive at Murray Canyon Drive, R-2/W-R-1-A Zones (I .L.) , Section 34. Planner (Abbas) stated that the elevations are similar to the original ; that the AAC recommends approval subject to conditions; that the cul-de- sacs are installed; the lots padded but not built; that the AAC recommended textured pavement or landscaping in the center of the cul-de-sac bulbs; that the AAC recommended that center pillars between the garages be increased in size for more depth; and that the roof top tile match existing unit tiles and also recommended some landscape changes. She stated that treatment of cul-de-sacs is per Fire Department recommendation for access flexibility and that the AAC recommend the landscape treatement on the bulbs. She described the areas of treatment on the display board. February 8, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 3 CONSENT AGENDA (Continued) CASE 30519 (-Reference 5.0032-PD-78) . (Continued) M/S/C (Mills/Hough; Edgmon absent) approving the application subject to the following conditions: 1. That the final development plans address the treatment of the cul-de- sac bulbs to include textured pavement and/or landscaping the center of the bulbs and the texture of the driveway. 2. That the architectural pillars between garages be increased to a minimum of 3'0" in width. 3. That the roof tiles match the roof tiles on the existing portion of the project. 4. That Pennesetum Setaceum be deleted and Encilia added to the landscaping plan. 4-0 vote. EASE 5.0474-PD-198 TIME EXTENSION. Request by CHRIS MILLS for Quality Centers for a 12-month time extension for a planned development district to allow construction of a shopping center on N. Palm Canyon Drive between Tram Way/San Marco, R-3 Zone, Section 3. L-- Planning Director stated that the project is the factory outlet complex at the entrance to the City reviewed by the Commission last year; that the final development plans are in effect for only 6 months; that staff recommends a 12 month time extension; and that one member of the public wants to address the Commission. Frank Tysen , 175 S. Cahuilla, explained that he and several others are in strong opposition to the project feeling that the image of a factory outlet at the entrance to Palm Springs is not the upscale, glamorous image the City is trying to foster, especially after ideas from the design workshop on the downtown held recently; and that there are many empty stores in the downtown which should be filled first. M/S/C (Hough/Olsen; Mills abstained; Edgmon absent) approving a 12-month time extension for PD-198. The new expiration date is December 1 , 1989. ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT ACTION AGENDA Approval of architectural cases is valid for two years. The approval granted must be exercised within that time period unless extended. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS LAND USE PERMIT -LUP- - 20120 RECYCLING CENTER -(Continued). Request by 20/20 RECYCLING CENTER to consider change of location and expansion of February 8, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 4 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS (Continued) LAND USE PERMIT---LUP) 20120 -RECYCLING CENTER (Continued.) . (Continued) recycling center at Von' s/Rimrock Shopping Center, 4733 E. Palm Canyon Drive, C-D-N Zone, Section 30. Planning Director recommended that the item be removed from the agenda since the 20/20 Recycling operation is not under contract with Vons and will be removed from the shopping center and reverse vending machines from another company (ENVIPCO) will be installed under contract with Vons. M/S/C (Whitney/Olsen; Edgmon absent) removing the item from the agenda. REVIEW REQUEST (Continued) . Request by JOHN HARRISON for Commission review of reconstruction of non-conforming gazebo structure within required setbacks at 1248 Buena Vista, R-1-C Zone, Section 11. Planning Director stated that the gazebo had been iin its present location a number of years and is under older 10 ft. setback requirements and was beginning to be reconstructed without permits in the current 15 ft. setback requirements of the ordinance; that the new structure is open and is made of heavy timbers which is more substantial than the original metal framework; that staff recommends allowance of the alterations; and that permits will be obtained if the current structure is approved; and that the height of the new structure is the same as the old one. Commissioner Hough stated that it is a large structure but is not very visible. Planning Director stated that the violation was discovered after a call from a neighbor. Commissioner Mills stated that the structure has the same footprint, and is the same size as the old gazebo, but the changes will be a major improvement. M/S/C (Mills/Whitney; Edgmon absent) approving the application as requested. CASE 3.964 TIME EXTENSION. Request by CRAIG SAVAGE for a 12-month time extension for a four-plex apartment building at the southeast corner of Calle de Carlos/El Placer Road, R-2 Zone, Section 19. Planning Director stated that the project was approved in 1986 and is now transfering ownership; that the project will complement the neighborhood; that the time extension is discretionary with the Commission and could be conditioned; and that unlimited time extensions can be granted under the ordinance. M/S/C (Olsen/Mills; Edgmon absent) approving a twelve month time extension for the application. The new expiration date will be January 22, 1990. February 8, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 5 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS (Continued) CASE- -10.370. Planning Commission determination that valet cleaning service is an allowable use in the C-B-D Zone. Planner (Evans) stated that the valet service would be within an existing complex in the Vineyard Shopping Center on S. Palm Canyon; that the primary use is a tailor shop which is a permitted use; that dry cleaning is prohibited; that the use will be a drop off station for dry cleaning which will then be sent out of the city; that the applicants want a small washer and dryer for small items such as shirts; that there will not be a delivery truck on site; and that if the request is considered, the Commission needs to determine that the use is similar to uses allowed in the C-B-D Zone as follows: 1. That the proposed use is in keeping with the character of the downtown. 2. That the use is compatible with the downtown. 3. That the use is similar to existing permitted uses. 4. That the use is not detrimental to adjoining properties. He stated, that there is a valet service operating within the C-B-D on Andreas between Indian and Palm Canyon; and stated that if the Commission approves the application, a Land Use Permit should be required. Commissioner Mills asked if the use is approved under a Land Use Permit, if such uses could be allowed by zone on an individual basis . Planner stated that would be the case. Ron Schubert, of Silver Hanger Cleaners, 245 S. Palm Canyon, stated that the washing and drying equipment is a Swiss type of home equipment; that the service provided will be washing, drying and ironing of shirts quickly; that no hazardous materials will be used; and that the cleaning will be taken to the company' s Twenty-nine Palms station. In reply to Commission question, he stated that the dryer will be exhausted within the building and that the water will be flushed into the existing drain. He stated that the washer uses only about 1/10 the water of a conventional top loading washer. Commissioner Olsen asked how the service differs from valet functions of resort hotels. Planner stated that it is the same, but that the question is whether or not this type of service activity should be allowed downtown. Commissioner Mills asked if it LUP could be conditioned to not have the equipment visible. February 8, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 6 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS (Continued) CASE-10.370. (Continued) Planner stated that it could be a condition. Commissioner Mills stated that he did not see any problems but wanted a condition that no equipment be visible. M/S/C (Mills/Dotson; Edgmon absent) determining that valet cleaning service is an allowable use in the C-B-D Zone under a Land Use Permit (LUP) subject to the condition that no equipment be visible through the window. PUBLIC HEARINGS CASE- 5.0501-_CUP. Application by BEN PERRY for a conditional use permit for a lighted tennis court at 2441 Southridge Circle, R-1-B Zone, Section 25. (This action is categorically exempt from Environmental assessment per CEQA guidelines.) Planner (Evans) stated that the pad for the court is existing; that there will be some vertical cutting of an already cut slope which might need fill material ; that the shoe box lights proposed will be five on a side and 10 feet in height with minimum spillover of light; that the AAC felt the light would be visible from several points in the City; that staff has received correspondence in favor and for opposition; that one person who favored the lighting is Delores Hope; that a representative from Smoketree Ranch is concerned about lighting of courts on the hillside; and that a Mr. Graham on Southridge also feels that the court should not be lighted and asked about hours of use. He stated that staff made several recommendations for mitigation if the application is approved. Commissioner Whitney asked about the properties the lights would affect. Planner stated that the Hope house will see a halo of light from surface reflection of the lights; that the Miller household can see the lights from their deck; that the household below could see the lights from their observation deck; and that the other properties are fairly well removed and not oriented toward the court. Commissioner Dotson asked about the additional cut on the south side of the court and Planner stated that the existing grades are a cut situation . In reply to Commissioner Dotson' s question, Planner stated that there is nothing comparable that is as visible as the proposed lighted court, and that there are very few higher properties in the City. Commissioner Whitney asked about the Smoketree opposition . Planner stated that the Smoketree representative is concerned about the policy of night lighting of courts high on the hillside and also in the possibility of there being a future lighted court on the Lansdale property. February 8, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 7 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE 5-w0501-CUP. (Continued) Chairman declared the hearing open. Chris Mills, 121 S. Palm Canyon, project architect, stated that the tennis court is on a separate lot and a house that would be lighted at night could be built on the pad; that the tennis court use is for a private home; that the court is tucked into the hillside into a cut slope; that the source of the lighting cannot be seen since the tennis court has been pulled back into the hillside; that landscaping appropriate to the hillside will be used; that major trees could be used to screen the light further; that the 400 watt lights from the 10 ft. high fixtures will have minimum impact; and that the applicant put up a light to be reviewed by Mrs. Hope, and she had no problem with it. Commissioner Olsen asked if a line of site study had been done to be certain that the house immediately below the courts will not be affected. Mr. Mills replied that only a physical line of site study has been done, but that the house below orients away from the tennis court and that the lights might be visible from the deck of the house below and perhaps when looking back uphill . He stated that landscaping could be used to eliminate the lights' visibility; that the applicant did not want to use lighting shrouds; and that the Perry home has desert landscaping which could be continued for the courts. There being no further appearances; Chairman declared the hearing closed. In reply to Commissioner Whitney's question, Planner stated that a covenant could be prepared running with the land and restricting the hours of usage and that the owner (Mr. Katzmyer) of the house immediately below the tennis court will be most impacted, but that Mr. Katzmyer's circular house is oriented to the north. Planning Director stated that Mr. Katzmyer was notified of the Commission date. Commissioner Dotson stated that he was vehemently opposed to a lighted tennis court on the hillside which will consider ably affect the 'flatland (whether or not it impacts the adjoining properties). M/S (Dotson/Hough; Edgmon absent) to approve the court without lights . The votes were as followed: Ayes: Hough, Dotson Noes: Whitney, Olsen, Lapham Abstension: Mills Absent: Edgmon The motion failed. Commissioner Olsen stated that the Commission has concerns but they can be resolved; that any light would be because of the halo effect; that the hillside is lighted at night by homes; and that the type of light would be an enhancement not a detriment; but that the effect cannot be determined until the lights are installed. February 8, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 8 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE-50501-CUP. (Continued) �.. Mr. Mills stated that the lights will be on the court surface and not down the hillside and a halo of reflected light will be all that is seen. Commissioner Dotson asked if Mr. Mills wanted to rebut staff' s opinion that the light will be extremely visible from a large portion of the City. Mr. Mills stated that it would not be as visible in the City as in the valley; and that the lights will be no more visible than the lighted homes on the hillside with their blinds open; and that the incidence of use will be less than lighting a home. He stated wthat there will be no cutting of the hillside; and that the pad has been established for 25 years. Commissioner Hough stated that he did not want to see tennis court lights even on flatland; that the applicant has an argument that a home would also light the hillside; but allowing tennis court lights on a hillside is precedent setting; and hillside applications will be applied for on non- separate pads. Commissioner Dotson stated that approval would be precedent setting and one that the City will regret. Planning Director stated that each lighted court should be taken on its merits and that he is also concerned about precedent setting. He stated that there is a potential for some of the lights to be seen from the south edge which can be mitigated by landscaping; that a brown wind screen and a �.. dark colored court can be used, and that a condition for no visible light source from off the property be required, which would allow only fixtures and landscaping against a backdrop to be seen . He stated that performance requirements will mitigate problems . Commissioner Olsen suggested that the Commission visit the site to visualize the cuts of the slope and effects of the lights and suggested that action be delayed on the application. Commissioner Whitney stated that she felt there would not be a decrease in property values because of the lighting's effects on other properties; and that it might be attractive to see the halo affect against the mountain. Chairman stated that the staff indicated that the application has merit; that the court's private use, location, condition of the lot, and the condition to limit lighting to the intensity of landscape lighting make the impacts negligible. He stated that the Elrod house in Southridge is lighted by landscape lighting and is visible but that the tennis court lights will not have as much impact; and that a condition should be required that the lighting is to be no more intense than surrounding landscape lighting. Commissioner Whitney stated that tennis court lighting applications should be reviewed individually. February 8, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 9 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE 5r0501-CUP. (Continued) Commissioner Olsen commented that he was not prepared to vote until he had visited the site to review the area from the standpoint of tennis court lighting. M/S/C (Olsen/Dotson; Miller abstained; Edgmon absent) continuing the application to February 22 for a field trip to the site. TPM--23755/CASE 6.366 VARIANCE. Application by THE HOLT GROUP for a tentative parcel map for a four lot subdivision and a variance from minimum lot dimensions and lot area at the west end of Camino Alturas/Camino Monte, R- 1-B Zone, Section 27. (Commission response to written comments on draft Negative Declaration; no comments received; action.) Planner (Abbas) stated that the applicant proposed to subdivide two existing parcels into four; that a flag lot will be provided for access to the two lower parcels; that a variance is proposed for deviation from the minimum lot dimensions since three of the parcels do not meet minimum zoning requirements; that the Zoning Ordinance does not allow the applicant to count any land exceeding 30% slope which is the reason for the variance; and that the map should not be approved unless the variance is also approved. She showed the location on the aerial map, and stated that the applicant will preserve as much of the natural vegetation and rock outcroppings as possible and that the AAC recommended continuance fora field trip to determine the steepness of the property. In reply to Commissioner Mill ' s question about retaining walls, she stated that the plans show potential building pads not a grading plan; and that Commission review is on the subdivision of the property. Chairman declared the hearing open. John Rupe, 1111 E. Tahquitz, project developer , thanked the staff for its assistance and stated that the property is deep and surrounded by higher tracts; that the conditions imposed on the development are commensurate with development in the Mesa area; that four lots are proposed with .4 to .5 acre each; that there is sufficient square footage; that the conceptual design will bring a new element to the Mesa; that the project is single- family residences in a Mediterannean flavor; that rock outcroppings will be kept; and that the development will be a revitalization of the Mesa area. He stated that the variance requested on lot size is commensurate with what exists in the area and exceeds 83% of the lot sizes; that many lots were padded prior to the current R-1-B Zoning; and that all architectural plans have to be approved by the AAC and Planning Commission. Gary Pike, Holt Group, 275 E1 Cielo, Project Engineer, stated that much homework had been done and the site studied; that one retaining wall is proposed with initial development of the property; that two driveways will be established initially with access to the flag lot; that the southwest flag lot has a driveway with a 12% slope; that the retaining wall will be 0 February 8, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 10 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) TPM...23755/CASE 6:366 -- VARIANCE. (Continued) feet at onP end and 8.5 ft. at the other for an average of 4.5 ft. in height: Commissioner Mills stated that he could see three or four different walls on the map and Mr. Pike stated that the plan to the left on the display board is the grading plan showing one 100 ft. retaining wall . Craig Burnwhite, 302 Camino Alturas, spoke in favor of the proposal stating that the project will revitalize the older area. Prospective Lot Buyer, Palm Desert, spoke in favor, stating that he would be buying a lot in the subdivision. Edna Beech, 1935 Camino Monte, stated that she wanted to be sure her view is not blocked including future views as trees grow. Mary Getner, 1921 Camino Monte, stated that four lots would crowd the site and change the beautiful piece of land. Planning Director explained that when the homes are proposed, the property owners adjacent to the property will be notified; and although there will not be a public hearing, the neighbors can look at the plans in the Planning Division . Planner stated that the property is almost 4 acres not discounting the slope. Commissioner Whitney stated that she wanted to see the property. Chairman stated that the project engineer should be present to explain the plans. M/S/C (Whitney/Olsen; Edgmon absent) continuing the application to February 22 for a field trip. TPM- 24145. Application by GRAYNER-RODGERS ENGINEERING for the Desert Sun for a tentative parcel map to create a two parcel subdivision on the east side of Gene Autry Trail between Tachevah/Ramon Roads, W-M-1-P Zone, Section 7. (Commission response to written comments on draft Negative Declaration; no comments received; action.) Recommendation: That the Commission order the filing of a Negative Declaration and approve the application subject to conditions: Planner (Evans) stated that there is a vacant lot on the west side of Gene Autry and the parcel map will legalize the subdivision of the two lots; that the City owns the westerly parcel which will have airport related uses in the future; that the Desert Sun previously received a Negative Declaration on the Planned Development District, so no Environmental Assessment was done on the map; and that staff recommends approval subject to conditions. • February 8, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 11 it PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) TPM -2-4145. (Continued) Commissioner Dotson asked whether or not the Desert Sun or the City were the applicant. Planner stated that the application was by the Engineering firm, Grayner-Rodgers, and that he would have to review the file to see if the City p PP took art in the application. Commissioner Dotson asked if the airport had any opposition and Planner stated that no issues have come from the airport. He stated that signals will be funded by both parties at Gene Autry and Tachevah. Chairman declared the hearing open. Debra Smith, The Holt Group stated that she was present to answer questions and that the Desert Sun is the only one responsible for funding the application. There being no further appearances; Chairman declared the hearing closed. M/S/C (Olsen/Dotson; Edgmon absent) approving TPM 24145 based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: Findings: 1. That the proposed two lot parcel map is in conformance with all provisions of the W-M-1-P Zone. 2. That the proposed parcel map complies with the General Plan , Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision Act, Subdivision Ordinance and is not detrimental to existing or future uses permitted in the area. 3. That the site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate future uses including yards, setbacks , walls, landscaping and other features required to adjust the use to existing or permitted uses of land in the neigborhood. 4. That the site is served by Gene Autry Trail , a major thoroughfare, which is designed and will be improved to carry the type and quantity of traffic to be generated by the proposed use. 5. That the conditions imposed are necessary to protect the public health, safety, and welfare. Conditi-ons: 1. That Development Committee conditions dated February 8, 1989, be implemented. Planner stated that the Desert Sun has two architectural changes to be discussed and that one of the changes requested is to change the finish on the lower band of the building from sand blasted and stained to just stained because of confusions in the specifications and to cut cost; that the AAC felt that it was acceptable to eliminate sand-blasting on the side and rear but recommended that the front planters be sand-blasted. and stained and an insignificant color difference will result. He stated that the second proposal is to reduce the reveal of the building from one foot February 8, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 12 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) TPM--24145. (Continued) to four inches which would show on some elevations; and that the AAC recommended denial because the committee felt it was important to keep the, depth. He stated that the structural changes could be accommodated at the current stage of construction; and in reply to Commissioner Whitney, he stated that the band would have been sand-blasted and would have shown on the north elevation, but that there is a large screen wall in front of the elevation which reduces the band's visibility. He stated that the applicant found discrepancies in the specifications and also wants to reduce costs. M/S/C (Hough/Dotson; Whitney/Mills dissented; Edgmon absent) approving the application to delete the sand blasted finish on a portion of the building provided the planter is sand-blasted, and denying the proposal to reduce a reveal from one foot to four inches. PUBLIC COMMENTS. None. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS DISCUSSION. Planning Commission appointment of one member to the Community Development Block Grant Citizen' s Advisory Commission at the request of the City Council . Economic Development/Housing Coordinator stated that in 1988 Federal regulations were amended to require that cities have a citizen participa- tion plan, and the Council each year will ask for volunteers on a Citizens Advisory Committee to solicit imput from the public for appropriate use of the following year's Block Grant Funds on the same financing schedule as the City; and that it is time to begin the public hearings. She stated that the application will go to HUD before May and that next year' s funding will be $335,000 and will be used at the discretion of and decided by the City Council . She explained that the advisory committee will meet probably three times with one public hearing, and that one of the meetings will be with staff to explain allowable uses under the Federal regulations. She stated that after the meetings the committee will be disbanded; that Council will hold two addition hearings before a decision is made on final allocations; and that the committee recommendations will be forwarded to the Council and Council action forwarded to HUD. Chairman appointed Commissioner Olsen to the Citizens Advisory Board because of his knowlege of finance. Economic Development & Housing Coordinator stated that a preliminary orientation meeting will be scheduled and Commissioner Olsen notified. �"� CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS. Update of City Council actions. d February 8, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 13 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS (Continued) Case 5.040E-ZTA. Council approved changes to the C-1 Zones. Staff dis- cretion was used to amend uses in other zones affected by the changes in the C-1 Zone. CASE 5.0502-ZTA. Council approved changes to the Tennis Court Ordinance although there was a dissenting vote by Councilperson Apfelbaum who felt that the 16 ft. high light standards were too much of a change and too high. COMMISSION/STAFF-REPORTS OR REQUESTS. - CASE 5.0501-CUP - (Ben --Perr Lighted Tennis Courts- & TPM 23755/6.366 Variance- Holt Grou . Field trip by the AAC and Planning Commission to be on Tuesday, February 21. Both groups to meet at the Planning Division Office at 11:45 a.m. Staff will accompany the members to the sites. - Palm Springs Classic. Update will be given Commission at the February 15 Planning Commission study session. - Zoning Ordinance -Amendments . City Clerks Office sends the amendments to Planning and the Planning Secretary sends or gives them to the Commission. i j - Palm Hills. Staff to show the overall boundaries of the potential park proposal in Palm Hills at the Planning Commission Study Session on February 16. ADDED STARTERS. None. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Chairman adjourned the meeting at 3:20 p.m. PLANN NG R CTOR MDR/ml