Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1989/01/25 - MINUTES I t • PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Council Chamber, City Hall January 25, 1989 1:30 p.m. ROLL CALL F-Y 1988 - 1989 Present Present Excused Absences Planning Commission This Meeting to Date to Date Larry Lapham, Chairman X 12 2 Gary Olsen X 11 3 Barbara Whitney - 10 4 Brent Hough X 12 2 Martha Edgmon X 13 1 Chris Mills X 11 1 Michael Dotson X 11 0 Staff ;Present Marvin D. Roos, Planning Director Siegfried Siefkes, Assistant City Attorney Richard Patenaude, Planner Debra Goodwin, Planner Sherri Abbas, Planner Dave Forcucci , Zoning Enforcement Douglas Evans, Planner Dean Lewis, Traffic Engineer Mary E. Lawler, Recording Secretary Architectural Advisory Committee - January 23, 1989 Brent Hough, Chairman Will Kleindienst William Johnson Reuel Young Tom Doczi Mike Buccino Chairman called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. M/S/C (Mills/Edgmon; Whitney absent) approving minutes of January 11, 1989 with the following corrections: Page 3, Case 3.0131; delete "5-0 vote" . Page 4, Sign Application (Joan Halley): Add AAC Minutes. Restudy noting the following: 1. That the background of the sign shall be a dark, opaque beige. 2. That the copy shall be red serif letters. 3. That the words "Palms Springs" shall be added to the sign in serif copy. 4. That the overall copy shall be reduced in size. January 25, 198Q PC MINUTES Page 2 Page 13, Single-Family Zones: (b) Should read "AAA. . . . . .from the court surface." (c) Should read " . . . . .tennis courts in hillside areas" . ... Page 13, Night-lighting: (c) Should read "no quartz light." Page 13, Multi-Family & other Zones: (a) Should read: "6' high solid masonry wall" . _ Page 16, Case 3.0516, last paragraph. Delete question marks. Page 16, Case 3.0516; Paragraph 3; add "existing" before "hanging plants" . Page 16, Paragraph 8; should be "wash" not "washed" before rock. Page 16, Paragraph 6 should read "lit or not lit Page 18; Case 5.0459. Add to motion "Mills abstained" . ADMINISTRATIVE NOTE: Planning Director introduced new Planner II , Debra Goodwin, who replaced Margo Williams. REPORT OF POSTING AGENDA: The January 25, 1989 agenda was available for public access at the City Hall exterior bulletin board and the Planning Division Counter by 1:30 p.m. , Friday, January 20, 1989. CONSENT ACTION AGENDA Approval of architectural cases is valid for two years. The approval granted must be exercised within that time period unless extended. M/S/C (Olsen/Edgmon; Whitney absent) taking the following actions: CASE 3.0409 - MINOR (Continued) . Application by WENDELL VEITH for architectural approval of revised exterior changes to an office at 2825 E. Tahquitz- McCallum Way (Sundial office complex) , PD-71, Section 13. Removed from the agenda pending receipt of revised plans. CASE 3.0417 - MINOR (Continued). Application by JOHN BUND for architectural approval 'of revised plans for a remodel and addition, and final landscape plans for an existing residence at 148 Camino Encanto, R-1-B Zone, Section 27. Approved as submitted. January 25, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 3 CONSENT AGENDA (Continued) CASE 3.0503- MINOR - (Revised). Application by ALLEN DAVIS for architectural approval of main entrance at 4765 Ramon Road, M-1 Zone, Section 19. Restudy noting the following: 1. That the proposed exterior changes should encompass more of the facade of the buildings. CASE 3.0461 (MINOR). Application by GARY W. MILLER for LDS Church for archi- tectural approval of minor exterior changes at 1400 N. Avenida Caballeros, R-1-B Zone, Section 11. Approved subject to the following conditions: 1. That the exterior changes to the chapel are approved. 2. That there be a restudy of the mechanical equipment screen with details to be approved by staff. TPM 22401. Application by CHRIS MILLS for architectural approval of preliminary plant list and review of curb and gutter materials for single-family sub- division on Racquet Club Road between Cardillo Road/Girasol Road, R-1-C Zone, Section 3. Planning Director explained that the plant palette includes all vegetation proposed for the subdivision; and that the application is using gray con- crete instead of aggregate (suggested previously by the Planning Commission) for the curbs and gutters. CASE 7.673 A.M.M. Application by ALEXANDER COLER for architectural approval of ornamental pots on gate posts at 555 Patencio Road, R-1-A Zone, Section 10. Continued for individual AAC field trips after lights are installed. Will be rescheduled. ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT ACTION AGENDA Approval of architectural cases is valid for two years. The approval granted must be exercised within that time period unless extended. CASE 3.0473. Application by KATHY POLOS for architectural approval for con- struction of restaurant located on Palm Canyon Drive between Mesquite Avenue/Sunny Dunes Road, W-C-1 Zone, Section 22. Planner (Abbas) stated that the restaurant has 300 seats and is proposed t °�-' south of the Sizzler on the west side of Palm Canyon Drive; and that the January 25, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 5 ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA (Continued) CASE -3.0452. (Continued) Commissioner Mills commented that the downspouts should be integrated with the architecture and detailed in working drawings and reviewed by the Commission. He stated that the canopy against the building will be a problem because of water running behind it. M/S/C (Hough/Dotson; Whitney absent; Mills dissented) approving the appli- cation subject to the following conditions: 1. That the elevations are approved as submitted. 2. That alternate trees be substituted for the proposed Eucalyptus and Yew Pine. 3. That a concrete band be provided at the entry to separate asphalt and decorative paving. 4. That the planter at the entry be expanded and that palms wrap around. 5. That planter and annual color be provided around the olives. 6. That a detailed sign program be submitted. 7. That details of the downspouts , scuppers, and the canopy be reviewed by the AAC -and Commission. CASE 3.0262. Application by ALEXANDER COLER for architectural approval of revised elevations for house at Patencio Road/O'Donnell Golf Course, R-1-A Zone, Section 15. Planner (Evans) stated that the AAC recommended approval ; and that the observation turret will be hidden by the house. Commissioner Hough stated that he had never liked the house as a hillside structure, and that now there is a pop-out in the center which is different from the original concept and makes him dislike the plan even more. Commissioner Edgmon asked if the Commission would review landscape lighting. Chairman stated that it would be reviewed. Planner explained that two elevations were submitted and the colored one showed the observation tower which on the rendering did not seen to be a strong element. M/S (Edgmon/Dotson) for approval of the application subject to conditions. The vote was as follows: Ayes: Edgmon, Dotson, Lapham Noes: Mills, Hough, Olsen Absent: Whitney i January 25, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 4 ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA (Continued) CASE 3.0473. (Continued) AAC recommended restudy because of the inappropriateness of the architec- ture for South Palm Canyon and because of concerns on the circulation and site plans. M/S/C (Olsen/Mills; Whitney absent) restudy noting the following: 1. Architectural style does not tie into the style of Palm Canyon Drive. 2. The design of the building is unacceptable. CASE 3.0414 (MINOR). Application by RADISSON HOTEL for architectural approval for revised elevations and awnings at 1600 N. Indian Avenue, R-3 Zone, Section 2. Planner (Evans) stated that the revisions have been made per AAC and Commission concerns and described the colors to be used in the tile and awnings. He stated that the AAC felt the awnings give importance to the building and are a good solution at the building entry. M/S/C (Hough/Dotson; Whitney absent) approving the application subject to the following conditions: 1. That the roof access ladder be relocated if possible and that a metal ladder be provided. 2. That the existing wood doors and chain link gates be replaced with metal doors. 3. That the trash enclosure wall be increased in height to 8 feet. 4. That a revised landscape plan be provided to open up the area. CASE 3.0452. Application by ROBERTSON-SMITH for architectural approval of revised elevations, and site and preliminary landscape plans, for a retail /commercial/industrial complex on Gene Autry Trail , M-1 Zone, Section 19. Planner (Evans) stated that the site plan was revised, the columns pulled back 2-3 feet and that the AAC gave direction on an overall acceptable site program. Commissioner Mills questioned the exposed downspout. Planner stated that the downspouts were not detailed and the AAC did not discuss them. Planning Director stated that the downspouts are on all sides of the building. January 25, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 6 ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA (Continued) I CASE 3.0262. (Continued) There was a 3-3 (tie) vote and the motion failed. Chairman stated that the elevations submitted were approved and the applicant is just bringing back working drawings for review. Planning Director suggested that the item be continued for all seven Commission members to be present. In reply to Chairman's question, Assistant City Attorney stated that a tie vote is a failure to approve. NOTE: The application was continued to February 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS CASE 5.0500-CZ/TTM 23938 (Continued) . Initiation by the Palm Springs Regional Airport of a Change of Zone from "N-0-5" to M-1 and for a tentative parcel map to allow industrial development for 20 acres of property on Farrell Drive between Tachevah Drive/Chia Road, N-0-5 Zone, Section 12. (Commission response to written comments on draft Negative Declaration; action.) Recommendation: That the Commission order the filing of a Negative Declaration and approve the Zone Change and map. Planner (Abbas) stated that the proposal is to rezone property from 0-5 to M-1, which is consistent with the General Plan designation and surrounding zones; and that Farrell and Tachevah will adequately handle the increased traffic. She stated that the Director of Transportation sent an updated memo to staff giving more information on the proposal . In reply to Commissioner Dotson's question, she stated that the triangular area on the display board is in the Clear Zone. Al Smoot, Director of Transportation, stated that an Airport Clear Zone was needed and the whole parcel was purchased by the City for that reason; that at one time a residential project was proposed and was denied by the Commission and an 0-5 Zone was established as the most compatible zone; that in the condemnation process the courts decided that industrial zoning was appropriate; that an industrial park is across the street; that the property owners have contacted the governmental agencies involved (and that he had also talked with the agencies) , and the agencies feel that the pro- posal is in order; that the safety question is determined by the FAA not the residents or Airport officials; that the parcels have been approved for industrial purposes by the FAA; that the safety question is not an appro- priate one; that M-1-P zoning exists across the street from the property but that M-1 zoning is more appropriate except for Lot No. 13 on Tachevah and the unnamed street; that the M-1-P lot (#13) would continue the 200 ft. buffer around the residential area; and that the residents have requested that the zoning be all in M-1-P and the roadway cut off from Tachevah, but that the roadway should access Tachevah, in his opinion. January 2.5, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 7 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE 5.0500-CZ/TTM-23938. (Continued) Commissioner Dotson stated that 70% of Parcel 5 is in the Clear Zone and no structures are permitted. He asked whether or not parking is allowed in the Clear Zone. Director of Transportation stated that parking could be allowed, but only walls and fences could be built in the Clear Zone. Bob Roberts, 2215 Tachevah, spokesman for the residents on Tachevah and Cerritos stated that the Airport Master Plan calls for uses around and on the airport to be compatible with the neighborhood indefinitely; that the Airport was forced to buy all the lots because the Indian landowner would not sell just one parcel ; that in 1978 a single-family development was approved along the west line of the proposed development and that he purchased one of the homes. He stated that those in close proximity with the development are protesting and have requested denial of the project in its present form. He stated that the residents have no objection to orderly development of the property, but want the Airport to give proper consideration to the neighbors; that the uses should be confined to Airport uses; that the unnamed street should be redesigned to have access only from Farrell ; that a redesign of the internal street would add more square footage to the subdivision; that placing traffic, including heavy trucks, on Tachevah Drive is inappropriate because of its residential character; that homes would be devalued and financial losses suffered (because of the necessity for full disclosure in resales); that M-1 Zoning will maximize a concentration of people in an undesirable location; that although he has no quarrel with aviation experts, an airplane crash would affect those in the area; that there is no real need or demand for M-1 Zoning; that lesser zoning will not diminish revenue; that the M-1/M-1-P Ordinance states that no industrial uses should be permitted which affect the residential environment of the City; and requested that the residents be protected by the City regarding the zone change. Harold Austin, 1180 Prime Circle (Sunrise Racquet Club) stated that the question is orderly growth and what is reasonable and prudent; that the Airport should remain vibrant but there should be developer responsibility to homeowners in Sunrise Racquet Club; that there is a natural buffer (Farrell Drive) existing presently between the industrial area and the residents on the north side; that zoning extending the buffer zone should be developed; that there is existing extensive undeveloped land west of Farrell Drive; that the Commission should look to the future but not toward infinity; that rezoning the proposed land industrial would be looking into infinity since there is an abundance of industrial land in existence; and that the open space designation should remain until the existing land zoned industrial is developed. Frank Coffey, 2127 Brentwood Drive, stated that he was a pilot and manager of Aeronautic Services at JFK Airport for 27 years; that his concern is encroachment into the area at the end of the runway; that poles and other structures can endanger airplanes and therefore endanger people; and that he had removed victims from an airplane crash in an approach zone at JFK just before he retired. Sid Fields, 2195 Tachevah, asked for a show of hands for those opposed to the zone change. (Many in the audience raised their hands) . I I January 25, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 8 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE 5.0500-CZ/TTM 23938. (Continued) Ken Jensen, 985 N. Cerritos, a 20 year resident, stated that if the Commission approved the Zone Change it would put the citizens in jeopardy; that the neighborhood had recently had a chlorine scare from the airport; and that traffic would be increased on Cerritos and on Farrell . Director of Transportation (rebuttal ) requested Commission approval and stated that development by right-of-zone could take place on the M-1-P property close to residents; and that industrial park could be built and the Airport should have the same rights; that he did not want to argue the safety question because the FAA has approved the zone change and the zoning is on the Airport Master Plan; that he would have no concern about requiring M-1-P uses if M-1 standards were allowed; and that intensive M-1 uses would not be allowed. Chairman asked if the possibility of having internal circulation accessing to Farrell only with no traffic flow on Tachevah had been explored. Director of Transportation stated that access to Tachevah was suggested by staff since there will be a traffic signal at that intersection. He stated that he supposed that internal circulation and ingress and egress only to Farrell would be acceptable. In reply to Commissioner Dotson's question, he stated that the M-1-P standards regarding landscaping and setbacks are not acceptable on Farrell ; and that there are 20 undeveloped acres between the subject property and Cerritos. He stated that changing the ingress would affect the Warner Cable Service Facility already approved; and that the 20 acre parcel fronting on Cerritos is M-1. Planning Director stated that the City tried to negotiate a 660 foot buffer strip of M-1-P zoning but the Indians would not negotiate; and that the M- 1-P standards on land behind Sunrise Racquet Club require 100 ft. building setbacks and a parkway and landscape buffer of 35 feet; that subdivision of the property will require a public hearing; that the ownership of the land is Indian; and that no one has yet proposed a subdivision. Chairman suggested that internal circulation be designed with cul-de-sacs at each end, running north and south of Farrell Drive. Planning Director stated that staff recommended access to Tachevah because of the proposed traffic light; that the Traffic Engineer could be asked about accessing mid-point between two streets as a sole point of access; that the Commission has the ability to change circulation since the street is not a General Plan Street; that the CUP for Warner Cable was predicated on there being a street but it could become a driveway. Chairman asked if there would be a traffic hazard if Chia and Tachevah were blocked off. Traffic Engineer stated that the turns would have to be right turn only; that the intersection of Farrell and Vista Chino is being upgraded for left turn movements; and that restricting left turns would restrict use of the lots considerably. Commissioner Hough asked about opening Chia to Farrell . January 25, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 9 PUBLIC HEIiARINGS (Continued) CASE 5.05100-CZ/TTM 23938. (Continued) Traffic Engineer stated that left turns would still be difficult and there would be a great delay at Farrell and Vista Chino because of the volume of tra�'ffic (causing stacking). He stated, in reply to Commission Edgmon's question, that there could not be more left turns out of Chia because of lack of signalization; and that stacking causes accidents. Planning Director stated that Tachevah is a secondary thoroughfare connecting to Palm Canyon, and that Cerritos and Chia are collectors; and that future development on industrially zoned land in the area will cause increased traffic on Cerritos. He stated that the effect on Cerritos of futIure development is being studied. (He described the streets and circu- lation patterns of the area.) He stated that the Commission can reserve direct access to Tachevah and Cerritos, but eventually the properties will develop and use the streets; that he did not know about alternatives and that specifics beyond the 20 acres have to be studied to understand the circulation. Discussion continued on types of zoning to lessen the impacts on the nei'ghborhood. Assjistant City Attorney stated that regarding development standards all prolperty development within the same zoning district has to be uniform; and that if different standards were used, a new zoning classification wou',ld have to be developed. Chairman stated that a zone change cannot be conditioned. Planning Director, in reply to Commissioner Dotson's question, stated that the' unnamed street would not be right-in and right-out; that the Commission can'', alter the lot sizes based on a specific map if it is meeting the intent of '',the ordinance; and that the Warner Cable CUP can be altered to have a driveway instead of a street. Commissioner Dotson suggested that Lots 4, 5, and 6 on the northeast corner be 'open space; Lots 1, 2, 3, and 13 on Tachevah and Farrell be M-1-P; and that Lots 7-12 be designated M-1. He stated that the zoning would protect the: area aesthetically and also protect the network on Farrell and Tac',hevah. He stated that Parcel 1 could be adjusted to accommodate Warner Cable if necessary. In 'reply to Commissioner Edgmon's question, he stated that zoning Lots 2 and', 3 M-1-P adjacent to Farrell would allow tighter controls along that street; and that Lots 4, 5 and 6 would not be developable for anyone else because 70% of them are in the clear zone. He stated that he was concerned about safety aspects; and that the land should be in an open designation. Commissioner Olsen stated that M-1-P zoning is acceptable except for the one: corner which should be M-1-P; that he felt that the street should be open onto Farrell between Lots 3 and 4, which differs from the Traffic Engineer' s viewpoint. �..� Director of Transportation stated that he did not believe that the intersection of the unnamed street and Farrell should be signalized because of :the proposed signalization at Tachevah and Chia; and that one access of January 25, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 10 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE 5.0500-CZ/TTM 23938. (Continued) right-in and right-out would not be to the City' s advantage for development of the properties. He stated that the south end cul-de-sac would be acceptable and the Warner Cable property could be modified to access the cul-de-sac, but that left turn movement is needed on the other end of the property; and that the General Plan Circulation System was designed to handle traffic on secondary thoroughfares. Planning Director stated that any street could be designated for restricting truck traffic; that the City's truck route program is preceeding; and that truck traffic could be assigned to Vista Chino as the primary access point with the other streets for local deliveries. He stated , in reply to Commissioner Olsen's question, that the street issues must be resolved with map approval . M/S/C (Hough/Olsen; Dotson dissented; Whitney absent; Mills abstained) ordering the filing of a Negative Declaration and approving Case 5.0500-CZ and TTM 23938 based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: Findings• 1. That a tentative tract map is the appropriate application for the proposed subdivision. 2. That the 20 acre site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed subdivision and the subdivision design meets all appli- cable M-1 ordinance regulations. 3. That the proposed subdivision has been designed to eliminate excess points of conflict on secondary arterials. 4. That conditions have been imposed to insure that the proposed map will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare. 5. That the proposed subdivision is consistent with all elements of the City's General Plan. 6. That the subdivision is served by two secondary thoroughfares, Farrell Drive and Tachevah Drive and a collector street, Chia Road, which are designed to handle the quantity and type of traffic generated by this type of land use. Conditions• 1. That all recommendations of the Development Committee (dated November 30, 1988) as amended be implemented. 2. That Lot 13 be rezoned M-1-P. 3. That the unnamed road be designed as a cul-de-sac with no access to Tachevah Drive. January 25, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 11 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) TPM 23937.- Application by KWL ASSOCIATES, INC. for Robert Harmon for a Tentative Parcel Map to create three parcels from five on property located at E1 Portal on South Palm Canyon Drive, W-R-1-B Zone, Section 27. (Commission response to written comments on draft Negative Declaration; no comments received; action.) Recommendation: That the Commission order the filing of a Negative Declaration and approve TPM 23937 subject to conditions. Planner (Abbas) stated that all parcels are substandard; that redividing into three parcels would make three usable parcels; and that there is no access to S. Palm Canyon from Parcel V. Planning Director stated that there is an adobe structure in the street which will have to be removed, and that a study requested by the Commission several years ago, determined that the structure is unsafe, cannot be moved, is in the right-of-way, and has not been declared an historic building by the HSPB. In reply to Commissioner Dotson' s question, Planner stated that although the three lots are substandard, they meet the square footage requirement for the zoning overall . Commissioner Mills asked about the feasibility of denying access to Parcel 2 from Palm Canyon prior. Planner stated that there was not sufficient frontage on Mesa to mandate access and the access would be too difficult. In reply to Commissioner Dotson's question, she stated that the existing house is 15 ft. from the property line and meets minimum setback standards. Planning Director stated that the requirements for design review on lots other than on major thoroughfares has been eliminated and the Commissioners could review the lots individually as a condition of approval if they desired. Chairman declared the hearing open. Bob Lotito, project engineer, KWL Associates, stated that he had no objections to the recommendations of staff. There being no further appearances; Chairman declared the hearing closed. M/S/C (Hough/Edgmon; Whitney absent) ordering the filing of a Negative Declaration and approving TPM 23937 based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: Findings: 1. That a parcel map is the appropriate application for the proposed subdivision. January 25, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 12 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) TPM 23937. (Continued) 2. That the site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the pro- posed subdivision. 3. That the proposed subdivision has been designed to considered the location of both the existing and proposed structures. 4. That conditions have been imposed to insure that the proposed map will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare. Conditions: 1. That all the recommendations of the Development Committee dated January 11, 1989, be implemented. PUBLIC COMMENTS - None. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS LUP. Application by ROBERT MESEER for approval of a one-time jewelry auction at the Wyndham Hotel on February 19, 1989. Planning Director stated that findings are present to approve the LUP for an antique jewelry auction, i .e. , the auction will not take place more often than every three months; that there is adequate parking and seating; and that the auction is appropriate for the location. M/S/C (Mills/Dotson; Whitney absent) approving an LUP for a one-time antique jewelry auction at the Wyndham Hotel on February 19. TRIBAL COUNCIL COMMENTS After consideration of the recommendations of the Tribal Planning Con- sultant, the Tribal Council found that the granting of a Land Use Permit was appropriate for this proposed sue, and approved the granting of such a permit. REVIEW REQUEST. Request by JOHN HARRISON for Commission review of reconstruction of non-conforming gazebo structure located within required setback, property located at 1748 Buena Vista, R-1-C Zone, Section 11. M/S/C (Olsen/Dotson; Whitney absent) continuing the application to February 8 at the applicant's request. January 25, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 13 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS (Continued) SIGN- APPLICATION - (REVISED). Application by HILTON HOTEL for architectural approval of a revised main identification sign for hotel (former Plaza Resort & Racquet Club) , 400 E. Tahquitz Way, C-1-AA/R-4-VP Zone (I .L.) , Section 14. Zoning Enforcement Officer stated that the hotel will change hands on February 1; and that provisions for temporary signs have been made. He stated that the first submittal was restudied and the second submittal is a monument sign in the same location as the first; that the cabinet is painted metal (the color of the building) with plex-faced letters pushed through the metal cabinet to a 12 inch level with lights showing through for a halo effect. He stated that the lettering style is new to Palm Springs; and that the AAC approved the monument sign and the sign on the entryway in the same style. He described the construction of the sign and stated that the edge of the letters will allow light to shine through, similar to that of reversed channel letters. He explained that the sign would be painted, not textured; and that the approval does not include the logo. M/S/C (Mills/Hough; Whitney absent; Olsen dissented) approving the revised sign application subject to the following conditions: : 1. That sign at the edge of the porte-cochere be constructed of brass. (The copy style shall match copy style of proposed monument sign.) 2. That the overhead sign on the porte-cochere be reduced to 16" in height. 3. That the monument sign will show no evidence of screws or seams and have a smooth uninterrupted finish. NOTE: Commission Olsen dissented because he felt that the second sign was unnecessary. CASE 5.0032-PD-78. Application by CANYON HEIGHTS VILLAS for further development for PDD-78, on South Palm Canyon Drive, R-2, W-R-1-A (I.L.) Zone, Section 34. (Project inactive for more than two years) . Planning Director stated that the Planned Development District has been inactive; and that the applicants want to finish Phrase I ; that the original architect is being employed; that there will be slightly less units than originally approved; that the issue is reactivating the Planned Development District; and that staff recommends approval . He stated that some floor plans will be changed, but the design is basically the same as the original , and the Commission will review each of the units. M/S/C (Olsen/Mills; Whitney absent) approving continuation of development of PD-78. January 25, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 14 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS (Continued) CASE 5.0032-PD-78. (Continued) TRIBAL COUNCIL COMMENTS The Tribal Council understands that a new leasee/developer proposed to con- tinue the build-out of this project which was started several years ago. The granting of a time extension as permitted by Code would facilitate the efforts to reactivate and complete the Project. After consideration of the recommendations of the Tribal Planning Consultant, the Tribal Council recommended that a time extension for further development of PDD-78 be granted. LAND USE PERMIT (LUP) - 20/20 RECYCLING CENTER. Request by 20/20 RECYCLING CENTER to consider change of location and expansion of recycling center at Vons/Rimrock Shopping Center, 4733 E. Palm Canyon Drive, C-D-N Zone, Section 30. Planner (Patenaude) stated that the recycling units have been in two loca- tions at Rimrock, first in the parking lot with a condition to build pads, and then in back after an appeal of the pad requirement; that the applicants now want to relocate to the front parking lot; that two more igloos have been added and a kiosk for an attendant; that the recycling company is requesting one more igloo; that most of the units are hidden although the tops can be seen; and that a request has also been received �..� for placement of reverse vending machines in the same location. He stated that the former Safeway Store contracted with 20/20 Centers; but that Von's (the new market) contracts with Envipco; and that staff has requested a letter from Von's giving permission for the 20/20 operation, but nothing has been received. He stated that cans and bottles can be processed in reverse vending machines; and that the collection boxes are now inside the store. He stated that the request is now for 5 igloos and the attendant's kiosk. M/S for approval of the LUP. The vote was as follows: Ayes: Hough, Dotson, Olsen Noes: Edgmon, Mills, Lapham Absent: Whitney There was a tie vote. Commissioner Edgmon stated that the igloos are ugly. Chairman stated that the tie vote would act as a denial and the application could be continued to February 8 to have all the Commissioners present. He stated that the units should not be on the highway and should be screened. Planner stated that when the units were in the back, people did not know they were there. January 25, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 15 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS (Continued) CASE-5.0032-PD-78. (Continued) Commissioner Dotson stated that he would rather have the igloos than have trash dumped in the canyons. Planner stated that the stores really do not want the units, but State law forces them to comply. Commissioner Mills stated that separate containers for household trash should be investigated; and that if everyone separated trash, the recycling centers would be out of business. Planning Director stated that a study was done in the City on trash separation but nothing was decided. The item was continued to February 8. CASE 5.0457-MISC. Review of Draft EIR for Designation of Regionally Significant Construction Aggregate Resources in the Palm Springs Production-Consumption Region within the City Limits and Sphere of Influence. Planner (Evans) stated that there are many City concerns addressed in the document; that the process is one where the State designates the gravel resources area and the City's have to consider these areas in land use determinations; that the areas defined are resource, not mining areas and general in impacts; that the resources area is large (from Cabazon to Thermal ) with three billion cubic tons identified; that the resources needed are 156 million tons; that one of the project alternatives incor- porated into the EIR is the City's request that none of the Whitewater River be designated as a resource area, which would exclude 2 billion tons from the study; and that the City's alternatives will be discussed later. He described the various areas near the City(entrances to the City, a small area on the south side of Hwy 111, a large corridor, and from Windy Point to the Whitewater Canyon area which the City wishes to keep as open space) He stated that it would be difficult to obtain a mining permit because of the endangered species in the area and the objections of the homeowners; and that the City has requested that an uninhabited area closer to Indio be designated with large canyons which flood and which contains a million tons. He stated that the long term concern of the City is that the Los Angeles basin will be depleted of gravel resources in five years; and that there is a railroad connection to Los Angeles in the valley which could facilitate moving the resources into Los Angeles. He stated that staff will prepare a letter denoting concerns and the EIR will be returned to the Commission before July and an additional public hearing held. He stated that the Council is concerned about the proposal and does not want the Whitewater River designated as a resource area; that smaller areas are being mined presently, but that the EIR addresses only the large areas; that the State does not do research; and that some of the gravel is old and decomposed and not strong enough for construction purposeds . Commission consensus: Commission reiterated staff' s concerns on the gravel resources designation. January 25, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 16 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS (Continued) ADDED STARTERS. (Determination of eligibility for consideration.) CASE 3.0193. Planning Director stated that the plans were submitted after agenda preparation which closed Friday, January 20 at 1:30 p.m.; and that the AAC did review the landscape plans on January 23. M/S/C (Edgmon/Hough; Olsen abstained; Whitney absent) determining that Case 3.0193 - architectural approval of landscape is eligible for consideration. CASE 3.0193. Application by MIKE BUCCINO for architectural approval of revised landscape plans for medical arts building on the northwest corner of Indian Avenue/Tachevah Drive, C-1 Zone (I .L.) , Section 10. Planning Director stated that the AAC recommended approval of the revised landscape plans; and that the tree pattern shows smaller plants than are normally used although the trees will be closer to the street and will seem larger. He stated that the impact of the plant growth will not be visible for five to seven years. Commissioner Mills stated that the plants are too small ; and that trees against the building should be 20-25 ft. high at least. Planning Director stated that if the palms are too high, the other plantings will not catch up in height; and that the height should be even with the building line. Mike Buccino, project landscape architect, stated that the building height is 31 ft. and a 25 ft. tree and a 6 ft. head would be too tall . He stated that he wanted the heads of the trees to grow softly against the building; and that Brazilian Peppers will be used on the Mezzanine with trailing geraniums especially grown for the project which do well in arid zones, and the applicant is willing to replace the geraniums every year and replacement is not expensive because of their being for the project. `'` He stated that if the Commission desired, it could condition that the geraniums be replaced every year and no plants trimmed except to enhance their natural character. Commissioner Hough stated that he too was concerned about the small sizes of the plants; that he checked with nurseries; and that trees are available in 48 gallon size. Commissioner Mills asked about a mix of sizes. Mr. Buccino stated that he wanted a uniform appearance in matched groups; and that he has located the plants at a nursery in the valley. He stated that the ficus are somewhat drought resistant and do well in the desert and that the project architect likes the landscape plan. Planning Director stated that a street tree plan for streets other than Indian and Palm Canyon can be discussed in the design workshop. M/S/C (Mills/Dotson; Olsen abstained) approving the application subject to the following conditions: 1. That the internal palm trees on the lower level be upsized to 15 to 21 feet. x January 25, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 17 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS (Continued) CASE 3.0193. (Continued) 2. That the street trees be 48 inch box size. COMMISSION/STAFF REPORTS OR REQUESTS. Downtown Design Workshop. Handouts are available. All Commissioners will attend a portion or all of the seminar. First day will be an overview to start the workshops. Small groups will than form for specific topic discussion regarding design opportunities and constraints. Then all groups will meet to discuss all topics. Second day could have more topics or changes based on the previous discussions. The handouts should keep the discussion pertinent and will expand the outline. Results will be analyzed and a consultant retained to finish the outline or the outline will be used as it has been developed. Staff will facilitate the discussions and Commissioners will be resource persons and go from group to group. Chairman suggested that the Commissioners not make strong statements; and that Commission opinion should be expressed at the final draft stage. There is no confirmation yet on the number of Councilmen attending. One of the ground rules will be that no one dominates the conversation. Indian Cemetery "No Parking" Signs. "No Parking" signs were placed on Ta quitz without permits in front of the Indian Cemetery. Recycling Issue. Will be a topic of discussion on an upcoming Planning `•.� Commission Study Session agenda. Palm Hills. Activity and grading in Palm Hills will be on an upcoming Planning Commission Study Session agenda. CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS. Update of City Council actions . No report given. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Chairman adjourned the meeting at 4:35 p.m. PLANTMG DIRECTO MDR/ml PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Council Chamber, City Hall February 8, 1989 1:30 p.m. ROLL CALL F-Y 1988 - 1989 Present Present Excused Absences Planning Commission This Meeting to Date to Date Larry Lapham, Chairman X 13 2 Gary Olsen X 12 3 Barbara Whitney X 11 4 Brent Hough X 13 2 Martha Edgmon - 13 2 Chris Mills X 12 1 Michael Dotson X 12 0 Staff Present Marvin D. Roos , Planning Director Siegfried Siefkes, Assistant City Attorney Amy Hodgett, Economic Development Coordinator Debra Goodwin, Planner Sherri Abbas,-"Planner Tracy Gunneman, Rehabilation Specialist Douglas Evans , Planner Dean Lewis , Traffic Engineer Mary E. Lawler, Recording Secretary Architectural Advisory Committee - February 6, 1989 Brent Hough, Chairman Absent: Mike Buccino Will Kleindienst William Johnson Reuel Young Tom Doczi Chairman called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. M/S/C (Olsen/Hough; Edgmon absent) approving minutes of January 25, 1989 with the following corrections: Page 3, TPM 22401. Add "Approved as submitted" . Page 4, CASE 3.0452. Before "program" delete "site" , add "sign" . Page 9, Paragraph 9, Case 5.0500/TTM 23938. First line delete "MIP" ; add "M-1" . Page 11, TPM 23937, Paragraph 7. Change "prior" to "drive" . Page 15, Case 5.0032. Commissioner Dotson's comments in first paragraph should read that he would rather promote recycling because he had concerns about filling . landfill sites.