Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1988/11/23 - MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Council Chamber, City Hall • November 23, 1988 1:30 p.m. ROLL CALL F-Y 1988 - 1989 Present Present Excused Absences Planning Commission This Meeting to Date to Date Larry Lapham, Chairman X 9 2 Gary Olsen - 8 3 Barbara Whitney X 9 2 Brent Hough X 9 2 Martha Edgmon X 10 1 Chris Mills X 8 1 Michael Dotson X 8 0 Staff Present Marvin D. Roos , Planning Director Frank A. Balistrieri , Deputy City Attorney Sherri Abbas , Planner Margo Williams, Planner Douglas Evans , Planner Dave Forcucci , Zoning Enforcement Dean Lewis, Traffic Engineer Mary E. Lawler, Recording Secretary Architectural Advisory Committee - November 21 , 1988 • Brent Hough , Chairman Will Kleindienst William Johnson Reuel Young Tom Doczi Mike Buccino Chairman called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. M/S/C (Hough/Edgmon) approving minutes of November 9, 1988 as submitted. ADMINISTRATIVE NOTE: Planning Director introduced Frank A. Balistrieri , new Deputy City Attorney, who addresses code and zoning enforcement issues. • REPORT OF POSTING AGENDA: The November 23, 1988 agenda was available for public access at the City Hall exterior bulletin board and the Planning Division Counter by 1:30 p.m. , Friday, November 18, 1988. November 23, 1988 PC MINUTES Page 2 CONSENT ACTION AGENDA • Approval of architectural cases is valid for two years. The approval granted must be exercised within that time period unless extended . M/S/C (Whitney/Edgmon; Olsen absent) taking the following actions: CASE 3.0328 (Continued) . Application by CENTER BELARDO COMPANY for architectural approval of detailed landscape, irrigation and exterior lighting plans for a two-story commercial building on N. Palm Canyon Drive, between Alejo Road/Amado Road, C-B-D Zone, Section 15. Restudy noting the following: 1. That more lasting material be provided. 2. That a landscape lighting plan be provided. 3. That a planting plan for the balcony planters be provided. 4. That a 24" box is the minimum size along the street frontages and the street trees should also include some 36" box specimens. (No 15- gallon trees are to be permitted on the plan and the trunk height of the tree should be specified, minimum 10 to 12 feet.) 5. That more trees be provided overall on site. 6. That shrubs be on a separate irrigation system than the lawn area. 7. That colored plans be submitted. CASE 3.0053. Application by ED KANAN for architectural approval of revised roof line and patio walls for apartment complex on Ramon Road/Grenfall Road, R-2 Zone, Section 23. Denied. CASE 3.0463 (Continued) . Application by JOHN STANFORD for Vito Distefano for architectural approval of detailed irrigation , exterior lighting, and landscape plans for single-family hillside residence on Lilliana Drive, R- 1-B Zone, Section 27. Approved subject to the following conditions: 1 . That trees be added to the east side. 2. That shade trees be added to the west side of the house. 3. That vertical height plant materials be added to the northwest and southwest corners of the building. • 4. That details be reviewed informally by staff and one of the landscape architects on the board . November 23, 1988 PC MINUTES Page 3 CONSENT ACTION AGENDY (Continued) • CASE 3.0471 (MINOR). Application by ALAN HALLEY for architectural approval of a two-bedroom addition extension of a garage and a new front for a single- family hillside residence at 2423 Tuscan Road, R-1-B Zone, Section 3. Approved subject to the following conditions: 1 . That the garage be 20 ft. deep per Zoning Ordinance requirements . 2. That the bottom two courses of glass block be deleted so that the bench height and planter height meets a solid wall and not the glass block as proposed. 3. That working drawings be submitted to the AAC for review and approval . 4. That the existing mechanical equipment be screened in a manner acceptable to the Planning staff. 5. That the water heater and air conditioning unit proposed for the addition be enclosed within a closet. CASE 3.0481 (MINOR). Request by CITY OF PALM SPRINGS REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY for architectural approval of landscape plans for a median island on North Indian Avenue between Las Vegas/Tramview Roads , "0" Zone, Section 34. • Restudy noting the following: Committee reiterated its previous comments with respect to design and is not an issue of plant materials chosen for this area but is a matter of design and the execution of that design . CASE 3.0488. Application by GREAT WESTERN BANK for architectural approval of as- built wrought iron railings at the bank at 499 S. Palm Canyon Drive, W-C-B- D Zone, Section 15. Restudy noting the following: 1. That the applicant is directed to contact the original architect for possible suggestions on design . 2. That the existing wrought iron railing be allowed to remain for the interim period until a design can be approved and installed. CASE 5.0437-PD-187. Application by MOTEL 6 for architectural approval of revisions to pool area and fencing for a 150 unit hotel on S. Palm Canyon Drive between Camino Parocela/Sunny Dunes Road, R-2/C-2/C-M Zones, Section 23. • Denied noting the following: Stating that the planter area south of the pool remain at 10 ft. in width per the previously approved plans . The Committee further directed the applicant that revisions to the poolside November 23, 1988 PC MINUTES Page 4 CONSENT ACTION AGENDY (Continued) • CASE 5.0437-PD-187. (Continued) and deck area could be made; however, if any of the landscaped areas were to be reduced or compromised , the plan would have to be reviewed by the AAC. SIGN APPLICATION. Application by IMPERIAL SIGNS for RPM Rent-A-Car for architectural approval of main identification sign for business at 540 Vella Road , M-1 Zone, Section 19. Approved subject to the following conditions: 1. That the outer band be increased by 2"-3" . 2. That only the portion surrounding "RPM" be lit. 3. That the size be reduced to 3' x 5' . 4. That the sign be pulled away from building corners . CASE 3.0482 (MINOR). Application by MARIO SAIKHON for architectural approval of exterior alternations to an existing building at 1081 N. Palm Canyon Drive, • C-1 Zone, Section 10. Restudy noting the following: 1. That the architect needs to provide the improvements to all four sides of the building, not just the north and east side. 2. That the design needs to be carried throughout the building. 3. That the building design needs to be more cohesive. 4. That colored plans are to be submitted. ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT ACTION AGENDA Approval of architectural cases is valid for two years . The approval granted must be exercised within that time period unless extended. CASE 3.960 (Continued). Application by BOB RITCHEY for the Palm Springs Mall for architectural approval of mechanical equipment screening for a community shopping center on Farrell Drive between Tahquitz-McCallum Way/Baristo Road, C-S-C Zone, Section 13. • Planner (Williams) explained the screening design and stated that one member of the AAC dissented, feeling that the parapet design is not a proper solution, and that the architect should use a split system. r Nove4ft 23,YFON PC MINUTES Page 5 ITEMS REMOVE CONSENT ACTION AGENDA (Continued) CASE 3.960. nued) Commissioner Mills commented that much time and effort ,�verespent on the th elevation of the wall and its skylights; that any screening will b ock the skylights; ao that the architect should have allowed for the gquipment in the design . Planning Director explained that staff recommended that the skylights be moved closer to the front so they became the screen and to maintain the skylight element, but the suggestion was not followed. Commissioner Hough commented that the AAC also felt that the skylights were an important feature. M/S/C (Whitney/Dotson; Olsen absent) restudying the application noting the following: 1. That a roof plan and a mechanical plan be submitted which illustrate a clustering of the equipment and the smoke evacuation system. The architect was directed to explore the use for the possibility of using a split system. 2. That cross sections through the roof area showing the relationship of the mechanical equipment to the roof line be provided. • CASE 3.0428. Application by PERRY FREEMAN for architectural approval of a revised site plan and elevations for the 171 room Compri Hotel on the corner of Tahquitz Way/Avenida Caballeros , C-1 Zone (I .L.) , Section 14. Planner (Williams) explained that the Council sent back the architecture to the Commission; that the applicants have submitted a new site plan and new elevations; and that the AAC recommended approval subject to conditions . Planning Director stated that the Council has, as a result of the application, discussed the quality and standards of hotels and reiterated its desire to have high standards for Tahquitz-McCallum and Palm Canyon Drive on new major projects. He stated that the Council did not discuss room rates; that the project is in excess of normal height limits and also in distance from the curb. Planning Director stated that the AAC expressed concerns over the parking arrangement although it has been moved from Tahquitz; that the building has been moved closer to Tahquitz, and that height is discretionary with the Commission. Planner stated that the tower elements are 50 ft. , that the building setback is 25 ft. and that the parking count exactly meets code. • Planning Director stated that if credit were given for the porte-cochere parking possibly 4 or 5 spaces could be deleted. November 23, 1988 PC MINUTES Page 6 ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT ACTION AGENDA (Continued) • CASE 3.0428. (Continued) In reply to Commission question , Planner stated that the zoning of the project site allows an setback of 20 ft. Commissioner Whitney stated that the corner is very important and deserves a high quality building; and that she did not like the roof height, setbacks , nor the massiveness of the building. Commissioner Dotson stated that he agreed with the dissenting AAC opinion that the building is too close to the corner; and that the pool area is not well designed since it gets no sun and is too crowded. Commissioner Hough stated that one of the AAC members dissented because he liked the previous site plan; and that the AAC did not like the massiness of the building and the shaded pool location. Commissioner Edgmon asked if the window air conditionoing units were a concern of the Council . Planning Director stated that he did not know if the air conditioning units were a major design issue of the Council , but the screening was and also the quality of the hotel . He stated that Councilman Foster was shown the plans but felt the air conditioning window units were not a major problem. • Jim Blockberger, project architect, stated that the hotel is a quality project with its tower elements, undulating setbacks and entry landscaping; that the Council suggestions have been followed; and that he did not know where the design was failing. Commissioner Whitney replied that screening of the air conditioning is a problem and also the quality. Mr. Blockberger stated that the air conditioning is a through wall type and will not be visible; that the hotel is a quality project; that working drawings will be submitted for Commission approval ; that the hotel is oriented toward businessmen and is not a destination resort hotel and that the pool is a convenience and the sun is not a major concern. He stated that the pool deck is of high quality material and more details will be included in the working drawings; and that the building is interesting and the tower elements enhance it. In reply to Commission question, he stated that the moldings around the windows will be plastered to match the cast stone, will have a good appearance , and that the moldings have been used on award winning buildings; that the texture is a smooth finish; that there will be a landscaped courtyard with a seating area off Tahquitz; and that the change in orientation of the front of the hotel creates more interest. Commissioner Mills replied that the solid balcony appearance of the screening of the air conditioning is a concern; and that the AAC should be • shown the detailing. November 23, 1988 PC MINUTES Page 7 ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT ACTION AGENDA (Continued) CASE 3.0428. (Continued) Mr. Blockberger stated that the design of the screening will be effective and that the only other solution would be to go to a different mechanical system. He stated that the glass could be pulled down as an option and that there are varying overhangs for interest on Avenida Caballeros. Commissioner Edgmon stated that losing an hour of sun each day is not inconsequential ; and that the applicants are underestimating the problem. Mr. Blockberger replied that the Compri is a fine hotel chain which is mainly geared to businessmen; that the Palm Springs Compri has been reviewed by the hotel owners and the group loves it; and that the pool is bigger than in other Compri hotels and is a convenience for businessmen . He stated that the pool area will be restudied in the working drawings and that the pool works in conjunction with the Compri Club which is a main function of the hotel . Planner stated that after measuring the roof plan the tower would be 85 ft. from the setback, 120 ft. from the property line, and that the second tower is 150 ft. , all from Tahquitz. In reply to Commission question, she stated that the roof tile is an "S" tile. Commissioner Mills stated that the design is a major step forward; that . other hotels do not have sun on their pools; that north elevations on Tahquitz should be redesigned; that the massing on the entrance on Caballeros will break the monotony of the window patterns and that the approach could also be used on the Tahquitz side . He stated that the site plan is good; that the corner element is not a problem since is steps back quickly; that the elevations have depth and the roof line moves; and that the extra height helps. He stated that the roof tile should be "Barrel Mission and mudded since the architecture calls for that treatment; that the building has quality as long as the Commission reviews the detailing; and that the Council should have no concerns. He commented that he was almost sure that the through wall air conditioning units would have to be deleted and another system devised. Chairman comented that the north-south portion of the "H" design could be shifted to the south for more depth on Tahquitz; that the balconies are not acceptable; and that the tile should be barrel . Commissioner Whitney agreed , but stated that she did not like to see a stucco and tile roof theme develop on Tahquitz; that she did not like the Marriott, and that she did not like the balconies or buildings of the Compri . Commissioner Mills suggested more substantial landscaping against the building on the east side; that parking should be placed on the south side to allow more landscaping; and that landscaping should also be added to the • southwest corner. He stated that staff could help the applicant. M/S/C (Mills/Hough; Olsen absent; Whitney dissented) approving the application subject to the following conditions: November 23, 1988 PC MINUTES Page 8 ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT ACTION AGENDA (Continued) CASE 3.0428. (Continued) 1. That the entry on Caballeros and Tahquitz be enhanced with landscaping. Details to be submitted with final landscape plans . 2. That working drawing details be provided of the cornice , fascia, and grill work proposed. 3. That the railings be of a decorative material or design. 4. That no bronze anodized frames be used for the windows . (That the window frames should either be wood or a color coated aluminum complementary to the building.) 5. That the pool area be restudied to explore the possibility of increasing the sunning area. (Details to be submitted with final landscape plans.) 6. That fountain details of the main entry fountain and the fountain located at the corner of Tahquitz Way and Caballeros be submitted with final landscape plans. 7. That the roof tile be changed to a mudded Mission Barrel tile. 8. That the window air conditioning units be deleted and a new air conditioning system designed. • 9. That the windows be designed to come all the way down to the bottom of the railing. 10. That more landscaping be added on the east and southwest sides . 11. That the Tahquitz elevations be restudied per Commission concerns on massiveness , height and proximity to the corner. 12. That the Tahquitz elevations be submitted before review of working drawings by the Commission . 13. That all recommendations of the Development Committee be met. PUBLIC HEARINGS TTM 23760/CASE 3.0452 (Continued). Application by ASL CONSULTING ENGINEERS for Don Robertson and Raymond Smith for revised plans for a tentative parcel map and revised architectural plans for an industrial subdivision on Gene Autry Trail south of Mesquite Avenue , M-1 Zone, Section 19. (Commission response to written comments on Draft Negative Declaration; no comments received; action.) • Planner (Evans) presented the project at the board and stated that revised elevations were submitted by the applicant; that the Fire Department has new conditions of which the applicant is aware; that November 23, 1988 PC MINUTES Page 9 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) • TTM 23760/CASE 3.0452 (Continued) Sunline Transit requested a bus shelter and turnout (but the Traffic Engineer says the site is too small ); that the bus stop and shelter will be considered at another location; that Sunline was advised of the meeting but did not come; and that the AAC recommended rather extensive conditions. He stated the lots are substandard and approval of a master plan is required; that the driveway intersects with Gene Autry at a 90 degree angle; and that the driveway, decorative paving and the median island were recommended for approval by the committee. He stated that the building has been redesigned for more articulation; the parking revised, and that the deadends remain but are gated off for vehicular storage only (no outside storage of material ) since the area is required to meet parking requirements. He stated that the AAC recommended approval of the concept including site plan and elevations subject to several conditions; that the project is one-phrased; and that the parapet height it not high enough to hide swamp coolers . In reply to Commission question, he stated that the approval is very close to a restudy, although the map is recommended for approval . Commissioner Mills asked about the abutment of buildings and the space between . Planner explained that there is a one-foot separation between the buildings which is closed on the sides with a fin wall and with sheet metal for the roof. • Chairman declared the hearing open. Frank Mungia, Temecula , project architect, stated that he concurred with AAC and staff recommendations , that the layout concept is acceptable; and that all/woUld be constructed at the same time. uniIn reply to Commission question , he stated that skylights are designed for the warehouse area; and that fencing in the back will be for storage of trucks and vans to reduce vandalism. There being no further appearances; Chairman declared the hearing closed. Chairman explained that staff is recommending approval of the map only with all other details to come back to the Commission. In reply to Commission question, Planner stated that there was no setback requirement on the side and rear property lines . Commissioner Mills suggested that the building elevations be more undulate and that overhangs be added. M/S/C (Hough/Dotson; Olsen absent) giving concept approval of Case 3.0452 subject to the following conditions: 1. That concept is approved for the revised building elevation, site • plan , and landscape plan . November 23, 1988 PC MINUTES Page 10 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) • TFM 23760/CASE 3.0452 (Continued) 2. That the full architectural approval submittal be submitted showing all 11 buildings with emphasis on the following elements: (a) That portions of window and canopy (spacing and size) . (b) That a roof plan and mechanical equipment screening details be submitted . (c) That details pertaining to roof drains be submitted. (d) That an increase in the use of color and treatment be explored. (e) That the canopy details and attachment to the building be provided. 3. That the site plan be revised to address the following concerns: (a) That the site plan comply with Zoning Ordinance (9306) relating to parking. (b) That details with respect to the wall material and location of wall be provided. (c) That an outdoor eating area for the employees be considered. • (d) That the location of the gate, its mechanical function, and its material be provided . 4. That a sign program be submitted for review and approval by the Architectural Advisory Committee and the Planning Commission. 5. That a lighting plan be submitted. (The lighting plan should include landscape lighting exterior building lighting, and parking lot lighting. 6. That the landscape plan be reevaluated to include more trees along the north property line, a restudy of the street frontage and relation to existing and approved projects on Gene Autry Trail . In addition, the London Plane tree is to be deleted; and, approving TTM 23760 based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: Findings 1. That a tentative tract. map is the appropriate application for an eleven lot subdivision. • 2. That the proposed tentative tract map and associated architectural approval application meets the intent of the M-1 Zone. November 23, 1988 PC MINUTES Page 11 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) • TPM 23760/CASE 3.0452 (Continued) 3. That the proposed commercial/industrial/warehousing uses are not in conflict with the General Plan . 4. That the proposed subdivision is not detrimental to the surrounding properties. 5. That an environmental assessment has been prepared and that no significant environmental affects have been identified . Conditions 1. That all Development Committee conditions be implemented. CASE 5.0400-ZTA. Initiation by the CITY OF PALM SPRINGS of an amendment to 9212.00 (C-1) of the Zoning Ordinance to amend the list of permitted uses . (Commission response to written comments on Draft Negative Declaration; no comments received; action.) Recommendation: That the Commission order the filing of a Negative Declaration and approve the amendment. • Planning Director stated that the amendment is a result of the North Palm Canyon Project Area Committee which wants to solidify, encourage, promote , and protect the gallery atmosphere which is developing along N. Palm Canyon; that urgency ordinances have been adopted to continue the gallery atmosphere; and that the Tribal Council requests continuance of the amendment to December 28, but there will be no meeting on the date. He stated in review of the gallery district the uses of the C-1 Zone were found to be appropriate except for auto part sales and liquor stores which will be required to apply for conditional use permits, and that Palm Springs is one of the least regulatory agencies regarding liquor stores in the state since most cities require CUP's for all liquor stores. He stated that there will be some discrepancies in other zones such as the M-1 Zone because of the movement to a CUP; that the gray areas are small stores like 7-11's and Circle K' s. He asked if the Commission would consider expanding to offsale liquor in general . Chairman asked for the status of existing liquor stores . Planning Director replied that in C-1 Zones they would operate as though they had a CUP; and that the point of non-conformity would be for a business not to be in operation for 180 days which would then not be able to come back without a CUP. Expansion or relocation would also require a CUP. He stated that the liquor stores would not be non-conforming unless they were prohibited in the zone. Chairman declared the hearing open , there being no appearances the hearing • was closed. November 23, 1988 PC MINUTES Page 12 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) . CASE 5.0400-ZTA (Continued) Planning Director recommended continuance until January 11 with review at the December 21 study session to discuss further regulation of liquor stores. In reply to Commission question, he stated that a use that is prohibited in the zone that precedes an ordinance or annexation has a ten-year time clock for amortization and can apply for extension of time. M/S/C (Whitney/Edgmon; Olsen absent) continuing the review of the amendment to January 11, 1989 and placing the discussion of the amendment on the December 21 study session . TRIBAL COUNCIL CONMENTS In keeping with its policy of reviewing and commenting on those land use cases that are City-wide in nature, this case was considered by the Tribal Council at its meeting of November 22, 1988. After consideration of the recommendations of the Indian Planning Commission, the Tribal Council took the following actions: 1. Concurred with the filing of a Negative Declaration. 2. Noted that the proposed zoning text amendment would affect a number • of undeveloped trust parcels currently zoned C-1. 3. To provide adequate time to review and evaluate the potential impact of this proposed amendment on undeveloped trust land, the Tribal Council requested that this case be continued to the City Planning Commission' s meeting of December 28, 1988. CASE 5.0496-CUP. Application by INTERACTIVE DESIGN CORPORATION for Gentry Development, Inc. , for a Conditional Use Permit to convert a structure for office uses at 1445 North Sunrise Way (Ranch Club) , R-2 Zone, Section 11. (Commission response to written comments on Draft Negative Declaration; no comments received; action.) Recommendation: That the Commission order the filing of a Negative Declaration and approved the application subject to conditions . Planner (Abbas) stated that the property has had many uses through the years and that the applicants are requesting a general office complex which is allowed in an R-2 Zone by CUP. She stated that the AAC recommended approval subject to conditions . Commissioner Dotson asked how much of the property would be demolished. • Planning Director replied that approximately one-third of the building (the single story section) would be demolished. November 23, 1988 PC MINUTES Page 13 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) • CASE 5.0496-CUP (Continued) Chairman declared the hearing open . Rueul Young, Civic Drive , project architect, stated that the applicant wanted to save the historic quality of the building but the rear portion violated ordinances and will be rebuilt; therefore, the perspective of the project was changed. He stated that there are three sensitive issues: proximity to the residences to the south, no street frontage, and formerly offensive uses of the building. He stated that the office use proposed in a much more modest one and that the building will have awnings integrated with the structure; balconies , and outdoor circulation with a driveway area replaced by grass and a fountain; and that the outdoor area will remove activity from the residences to the south and a good environment will be created for the offices. He stated that it is a negative aspect that there is no street frontage. He explained that because there is very little tile, "Barrel " tile will be used for the roof. David Rous , the applicant E1 Segundo, stated that he took a deteriorating building and turned it into a well-designed, useful one. There being no further appearances; Chairman declared the hearing closed. Commissioner Edgmon commented that the neighbors would probably be delighted with the proposal . • M/S/C (Mills/Edgmon; Olsen absent) ordering the filing of a Negative Declaration and giving final approval to the application based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: Findings: 1. That the proposed office complexes are properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized by the Zoning Ordinance. 2. That the proposed improvements , specifically the new office buildings, are desirable for the community and are in harmony with the existing development, and the General Plan , and are not detrimental to the neighborhood. 3. That the site, being 1.6 acres in size and irregular in shape, can accommodate the proposed improvements including yards , set-backs , walls, landscaping, and parking. 4. That the site is located on Sunrise Way which is adequate to handle anticipated traffic. 5. That conditions of approval upon the site are necessary to protect the public heath , safety, and general welfare. Conditions: 1. That all recommendations the Development Committee Coinditions dated October 14, 1988 shall be met. November 23, 1988 PC MINUTES Page 14 • PUBLIC COMMENTS - None. ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT ACTION AGENDA Approval of architectural cases is valid for two years. The approval granted must be exercised within that time period unless extended. CASE 5.0067-PD-87. Application by WILLIAM GIETTER for architectural approval of final development plans for Phase II of business park/mini-warehouse complex on McCarthy/Radio Roads , M-1 Zone, Section 34. Planner (Abbas) stated that the project is an old one with a business park and E-Z Storage use; that the E-Z Storage is built and the applicant is requesting approval of final development plans for the business park; that more than two years have elapsed from the construction of the E-Z Store; and that staff is recommending approval of the extension of the Planned Development District. She stated that the design issues were resolved with the AAC which recommended approval subject to several conditions. Planning Director explained that the ordinance revisions of two years ago require that planned development districts , stopped for more than two years, have to have Commission approval to continue (without a public hearing); that the building materials of the property line walls might allow a mural ; and that in the past the walls have been vandalized with graffiti . He stated that the property to the east may develop and hide the wall but the property to the south is residential , and that he has not discussed a mural with the applicant. Chairman asked about the AAC objections to the air conditioning on the ground . Planning Director answered that the wall units will not completely air condition the space (only the office portion) and the initial construction should develop the screening system for the additional air conditioning. In reply to Commission question , he stated that there is a twenty foot setback by right of zone, but the Planned Development District was designed as an M-1 project (before R-2 Zoning); and that the Planned Development District should be continued. He stated that there are carports on the side facing the residences . Wendell Veith, 556 S. Sunrise, project architect, stated that the applicant wants precision block on the east and south because of the M-1 Zoning originally on the property; that split-face block was shown just above doors and windows because of the breaks in the buildings, because of the length of the E-Z Store there was a continuous repeat and the AAC might have been thinking about that when it made its recommendation for a continuous band; that the parapet can be raised to hide mechanical equipment; and that because the nature of the occupancy is not known , the units will be 10 by 12 with bathrooms and the air conditioning covered by 40 landscaping. November 23, 1988 PC MINUTES Page 15 ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT ACTION AGENDA (Continued) • CASE 5.0067-PD-87. (Continued) In reply to Commission question, Planning Director hated that the Planned Development District has not expired; that part of the construction has been done; that it is discretionary with the Commission for a time extension to allow the final phrase; and that the blue line drawings shown are the same as the actual architecture. Commissioner Mills stated that he did not feel that the architecture and the blue lines were the same; and that the stepping of the wall should be part of the architecture. He stated that he did not feel that either the stepping nor the architecture were acceptable. Commissioner Dotson commented that he did not like the south elevation; that he did not know whether or not a mural would solve the problem; that the architecture is not the same as the blue line; that screening and that increased elevation would impact the residents to the south even though there would be a parking structure between the project and the residential area. Planning Director replied that instead of screening by a wooden structure, perhaps the air conditioning could be sunken into wells; that striping was deleted and recommended to be reviewed by staff as well as the split rib facing. (Planning Director circulated photos of split-rib band condition) . He stated that the band was deleted in construction and that the buildings • in the area are industrial in appearance. Mr. Veith stated that a screening design could be developed. In reply to Commission question, he stated that the building was designed for a specific size retail unit and because of the grading situation the units was broken up logically through the buildings . Chairman suggested that the vertical breaks in the wall be restudied and redesigned differently and that the roof line be redesigned. M/S/C (Mills/Whitney; Olsen absent) extending the planned development district (no certain date) and restudying the final development plans noting the following: 1. Exterior material to match existing EZ 2 Store. 2. Split rib to be one continuous band around building. 3. Parapet to be provided to screen roof mounted equipment. 4. Property line wall to be alternating split face and rib face block. 5. Ground cover to be provided under the shrubs . 6. Roof line be redesigned. 7. The wall to be redesigned and the steps made part of the architecture. November 23, 1988 PC MINUTES Page 16 ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT ACTION AGENDA (Continued) . CASE 3.0486. Application by ERNIE NOIA for the Palm Springs Senior Center for architectural approval of an addition and remodel to existing building on the northeast corner of Ramon Road/Sunrise Way, "0" Zone, Section 13. Planner (Williams) explained the project on the board. She stated that the application was recommended for approval , but that one of the members was opposed because of the colors , and the bellow window and the mass of the north elevation; and that the buildingwill have two tones of gray with a turquoise trim. Chris Mills, 121 S. Palm Canyon , project architect, stated that the bellow window was designed to soften the corner of the building and to eliminate view blockage of the park and is not a haphazard element. He stated that the mass area on the north has much depth and that also it will not be seen because of the Boys' Club building. Commissioner Whitney stated that the Senior Center will be constructing a brick patio and walkway similar to that of the Village Green and asked the color of the bricks . Mr. Mills stated that he would be involved in the selection of the color to make sure that it blends with the building. He stated that the brick color tones will be submitted with landscape plans. Commissioner Hough stated that he liked the design but felt that the main entry should be given more sense of entry, perhaps with hardscape. Mr. Mills stated that he was designing the landscape plan from a hardscape standpoint and that it reads strongly as an entry. In reply to Commissioner Dotson's question, he stated that the trellis is new and will be a shade structure for an outdoor room and that horizontal elements in the new portion of the building are also in the existing building. He stated that the donors' wall has breaks and the glass area will be lighted for a natural light area for a strong emphasis. Chairman commented that the building is very interesting. M/S/C (Whitney/Dotson; Mills abstained; Olsen absent) approving the application subject to the followings conditions: 1. That final landscape, exterior lighting, and irrigation plans be submitted for review and approval . 2. That the entry to the building be accented with hardscape and landscaping. (Details to be submitted with final landscape plans . ) 3. That a sample of the proposed stone be submitted to the AAC for review and approval prior to installation. 4. That the brick tones of the walkway and patio coordinate with the colors of the building. • 5. That all recommendations of the Development Committee be implemented. November 23, 1988 PC MINUTES Page 17 • MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS DISCUSSION. PLANNING COMMISSION discussion of murals on vacant walls in the City and possibility of doing a sample on a downtown wall . Zoning Enforcement Officer stated that the Redevelopment Agency has been working on a plan to cosmetically change the east side of 300 block of Palm Canyon, through painting, refurbishing, and landscaping; and that there is a plain wall on the south side of Bruener's which would be ideal for a mural which could be viewed by pedestrians. He stated that the design would be done by a professional and will be an enjoyable conversation piece and that Jeannie Reller of the Economic Development Commission (EDC) Downtown Committee knows an artist who would be interested. Jeannie Reller, EDC, stated that on the lot next to Bruener' s there will be grass , park benches , a sprinkler system, and . would be a draw for that end of town. She stated that no ideas have been developed yet, but that one of the artists that she had in mind painted the Indian on the Palm Springs High School wall and the mural at Highland Community Center. In reply to Chairman' s question, she stated that the artist would prepare a sketch for Commission review. In reply to Commissioner Dotson' s question, she stated that funding will have to be discussed, but that there are funds in Redevelopment, and that operation "Face Lift" for the east side of Palm Canyon is under budget. She stated that the design would involve the community. Commissioner Dotson stated that public art funding should be investigated and that there should be significant input from the Historic Board regarding subject matter. Commissioner Hough stated that the Commission should review the proposal and the mural should be of professional quality. Mrs. Reller stated that she agreed. Chairman stated that the Commission must be careful in setting a precedent regarding text and quality. In reply to Commissioner Edgmon' s question, Mrs . Reller stated that the City will maintain the grass in the park. Planning Director stated that the Commission should direct staff to work with the EDC Downtown Committe and bring back a proposal which would eventually be reviewed by the Public Arts Commission when its membership is selected. Chairman recommended that the proposal be shown in color and scale. Planning Director stated that the property is not owned by the City and that there could not be a park until approval is given by the property • owner. November 23, 1988 PC MINUTES Page 18 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS (Continued) . DISCUSSION (Continued) Mrs . Reller stated that all property owners have been sent letters with color chips for building colors . Planning Director stated that an agreement could be developed with the property owner that includes a cancellation clause. Mrs. Reller stated that no funds have been received from the owners of the buildings, but everyone involved is enthusiastic. Planning Director circulated pictures of murals from other cities. Commission consensus was that the concept is viable but the mural design is to be reviewed by the Commission before work is started. LAND USE PERMIT (LUP) - AUCTION. Application by PERRY KALIL for Oriental Rug Liquidators , Inc. for Commission approval of LUP granting a one time auction of rugs on December 9, 1988 at 8:00 p.m. at Maxim' s Hotel , 285 N. Palm Canyon Drive , CBD Zone, Section 15. M/S/C (Edgmon/Dotson; Olsen absent) approving a land use permit for a one time auction of rugs on December 9 at Maxims Hotel . CASE 10.365. Staff request for PLANNING COMMISSION discussion regarding hotel lobby conversion to retail space for the Fairmont Hotel , 641 N. Palm Canyon Drive, C-1/R-3 Zones , Section 10. Planning Director stated that prior to the recent zoning ordinance revisions commercial was allowed in resort hotels with 40,000 sq. ft. of lot area, but the criteria is now 100 rooms. The room count of the subject hotel is less than 40 rooms and the proposal would be a mixed use with no criteria for retail space on Palm Canyon. One part of the hotel continues as a small restaurant and staff recommends denying the conversion by the method of a determination which would set a precedent for conversion to retail space without the necessary parking. He stated that the mixed use concept could be considered under a planned development district along with a property upgrade. Commissioner Edgmon stated that she could see many problems if conversion were allowed. Commissioner Hough agreed, and stated that he was concerned about precedent setting. Robert Burnham, subject property owner, stated that he had not applied for anything and that the issue has been raised by Planning staff; that the • tenant was advised that he needs to make application for the retail space, but the tenant said he could not because of his lawyers' advice, November 23, 1988 PC MINUTES Page 19 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS (Continued) CASE 10.365 (Continued) that the tenant is legally leasing space currently. He stated that he had not consulted counsel , that he wants to use the space as retail , that he had tried to find a gallery tenant, which would be ideal , but could not, that galleries do not have large parking volumes , and that he would take action after the City' s decision. Commissioner Mills stated that a planned development application for a mixed use would be an appropriate application and would upgrade the property but the use has problems as it exists . M/S/C (Hough/Edgmon; Olsen absent) denying conversion of a hotel lobby to retail space in the Fairmont Hotel . CASE 10.366. PLANNING COMMISSION discussion/determination regarding used car sales as an accessory use to a car rental facility, citywide. Planning Director stated that staff recommends against using car sales as an accessory use to car rental agencies because of the difficulty in monitoring them; that used car sales are allowed in the "A" Zone and no one has taken advantage of it; that the Airport is promoting sales because of the revenue; and that an alternative could be to amend the ordinance to allow a limited period of time for the sales under a land use permit which • would allow staff review rather than a blanket allowance. He stated that dealers could be asked about the length of time necessary to sell the cars and the use would be allowed on a case by case basis; and that staff feels that once a year should be sufficient. Commissioner Mills suggested that staff ask smaller dealers about the length of time they need, since they might have more problems. Zoning Enforcement Officer stated that car rental agncies sell cars 12 months a year, and that it would be difficult to determine which cars are being legitimately sold. Chairman suggested that private sales be eliminated and a certain amount of time be given to advertise and sell the cars . Commissioner Dotson asked for the rationale against used car sales as a primary use since classic cars do not always have a good appearance. Planning Director stated that he did not know the original rationale, but in the past used car lots have a varigated appearance and unappealing architecture and lack of maintenance , and the use was disallowed years ago . He stated that it is true that some of the classic cars are not really classics . He stated that used car lots do not have the quality appearance of a new car fleet. • M/S/C (Edgmon/Hough; Olsen absent) directing staff to amend the Zoning Ordinance to allow used car sales on an individual basis under a land use permit. (The use is not allowed by right of zone) . November 23, 1988 PC MINUTES Page 20 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS (Continued) CASE 20.109. Request by RIVERSIDE COUNTY for Planning Commission review of a change of zone from W-2 to City of Palm Springs on the northwest corner of Gene Autry Trail/Vista Chino, Sphere of Influence (County #CZ 5321) . Planner (Evans) stated that the change of zone is inappropriate since the current zoning is W-2, which is controlled development, and the proposed zoning is highway commercial . He stated that the County does not have a contract on Indian land . Chairman stated that the adjacent residents could sue because of the proposed change in zone . Commissioner Mills agreed , stating that the allowance of CPS development will be the development that occurs , and suggested that the County contact the neighbors and also develop specific setbacks addressing the situation if the County allows the zoning. Chairman stated that houses are built there now, and that the people on the west are in the city limits . Planner stated that annexation would be to the City of Palm Springs, the Council is reviewing expansion of the City into that area and that the maximum height limit is 50 to 75 feet. • Chairman stated that the City has not protected its entryways . He suggested that staff develop language to indicate to the County that CPS Zoning standards should not be allowed as a blanket use in such a sensitive residential area because it is poor planning, and there is a liability. M/S/C (Whitney/Edgmon; Olsen absent) recommending denial of the change of zone from W-2 to CPS. DETERMINATION 10.366. PLANNING COMMISSION determination that a car leasing/rental and on-site storage use is an allowable use in the C-S-C Zone, City-wide. Planner (Williams) stated that the Palm Springs Mall requested allowance of a car rental agency and on-site storage after the lease had already been signed with the tenant, and that the staff informed the mall manager that the leasing office is allowable but that storage and maintenance and rentals have to be off-site. She stated that the Commission determination would be to store leased cars on-site (the proposal was twenty cars) with the washing and maintenance to be off-site; and that the mall manager was in the audience but had to leave. Planning Director stated that staff recommends denial except for a leasing office and that there was no parking shortage at the mall but the major issues are carwashing and maintenance which lack control and are not a . purpose of a community shopping center. November 23, 1988 PC MINUTES Page 21 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS (Continued) • DETERMINATION 10.366. (Continued) Commissioner Edgmon stated that there could be a parking problem depending on location of the car rental spaces . M/S/C (Edgmon/Dotson; Olsen absent) determining that a car rental and on- site storage use is not an allowable use in the CSC Zone. CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS. Update of City Council actions. CASE 5.0487-CUP (Smoketree Stables). Council approved a 10-year time extension for the CUP. TTM 23288 (Voss Investments) . Approved by the Council . TPM 23123 (McKernan). Approved by the Council . COMMISSION/STAFF REPORTS OR REQUESTS. Case 3.960 - (Palm Springs Mall ). Repainting is following the approved plan, but the paint cannot be matched because of the fading of the old paint and looks brighter; eventually the Mall will probably all be • repainted. The Mall has been sold and there is no certificate of occupancy because of corrections that need to be done. The paint will tone down the colors and the hot pink will be deleted. A Certificate of Occupancy is necessary for the sale of the property. Mobile Home Sales Lot on I-10 and Indian Avenue. The sales lot does not even meet County requirements but the County will not abate the use because of lack of personnel . It is in Supervisor Ceniceros' district and staff will contact her by letter. - Case 20.013 (TPM 22631) . This subdivision at the corner of I-10/Palm Drive is in the Sphere of Influence and staff went to the East Area Planning Commission to give City recommendations on premature development and a recommendation against subdivision of the land. Staff was asked the reasons for its being at the meeting and why City comments had not been received. Staff did not attend previously but had transmitted the denial recommendation. Staff reviewed access issues and the County agreed with the City, but approved the project without the conditions the City recommended. The new member of the EAPC seems to want to upgrade the County requirements , but supervisors will not impose additional conditions on developers because the County does not want City of Palm Springs' standards. Chairman commented that because of politics and individual districts , no one cares about the County at large. • - Palm Springs Liquor Store, N. Palm Canyon Dr. (former Gilligan' s Island) . The owner is painting and refreshing the property by City directive. Desert Hospital is discussing expanding into the area of the November 23, 1988 PC MINUTES Page 22 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS (Continued) • COMMISSION/STAFF REPORTS OR REQUESTS. (Continued) tennis courts with medical offices which would remove the problem at the liquor store at its present location , but the owner would probably relocate and the problem will resurface with the store relocation because the clientele is the problem. FAX NUMBERS. Planning Director requested FAX numbers of the Commissioners. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Chairman adjourned the meeting at 4:25 p.m. / a ' P ING DIRECTOR MDR/ml WP/PC MIN PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Council Chamber, City Hall December 14, 1988 • 1:30 p.m. ROLL CALL F-Y 1988 - 1989 Present Present Excused Absences Planning Commission This Meeting to Date to Date Larry Lapham, Chairman X 10 2 Gary Olsen X 9 3 Barbara Whitney - 9 3 Brent Hough X 10 2 "lartha Edgmon X 11 1 Chris Mills X 9 1 Michael Dotson X 9 0 Staff Present Marvin D . Roos , Planning Director Siegfried Siefkes , Assistant City Attorney Sherri Abbas , Planner Margo Williams , Planner Richard Patenaude , Planner Douglas Evans , Planner John Terell , Redevelopment Planner Wif1 Miller, Traffic Engineering Assistant Frank+' Balistrieri , Deputy City Attorney Mary E. Lawler, Recording Secretary • Architectural Advisory Committee - December 12, 1988 Brent Hough , Chairman Uill Kleindienst 'illiam Johnson Reuel Young Tam Doczi Mike Buccino Chairman called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. I'./S/C (Hough/Edgmon ; ',;hitney absent) approving minutes of November 23, 1988 with the following correction : CASE 20. 100. Pace 2C, Paragraph 1 , Change City of Palm Springs to "CPS" . ADMINISTRATIVE NOTE: There were no Tribal Council Comments . REPORT OF POSTING AGENDA: . The December 14, 1988 agenda was available for public access at the City Hall exterior bulletin board and the Planning Division Counter by 1 :30 p.m. , Friday, December 9, 1988.