Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1988/10/26 - MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Council Chamber, City Hall October 26, 1988 1:30 p.m. ROLL CALL F-Y 1988 - 1989 Present Present Excused Absences Planning Commission This Meeting to Date to Date Larry Lapham, Chairman X 7 2 Gary Olsen X 8 1 Barbara Whitney X 7 2 Brent Hough X 7 2 Martha Edgmon X 8 1 Chris Mills X 7 0 Michael Dotson X 6 0 Staff Present Marvin D. Roos , Planning Director Siegfried Siefkes , Assistant City Attorney Sherri Abbas , Planner Margo Williams, Planner Douglas Evans, Planner Dave Forcucci , Zoning Enforcement Dean Lewis, Traffic Engineer Mary E. Lawler, Recording Secretary Architectural Advisory Committee - October 24, 1988 Brent Hough, Chairman Absent: William Johnson Reuel Young Will Kleindienst Mike Buccino Tom Doczi Chairman called the meeting to order at 1 :30 p.m. M/S/C (Olsen/Dotson; Mills absent) approving minutes of October 12, 1988 with the following corrections: Page 4. Case 5.0344-PD-164, Paragraph 3, should read .. . "right on the blackboard display" . page 14. Case 5.0491-CUP. Last paragraph motion should read . . . "Whitney absent; Dotson dissented" . October 26, 1988 PC MINUTES Page 2 ELECTION OF OFFICERS M/S/C (Olsen/Whitney) unanimously re-electing Larry Lapham as Chairman. M/S/C (Edgmon/Mills) unanimously electing Gary Olsen as Vice-Chairman. REPORT OF POSTING AGENDA: The October 26, 1988 agenda was available for public access at the City Hall exterior bulletin board and the Planning Division Counter by 1:30 p.m., Friday, October 21. CONSENT ACTION AGENDA Approval of architectural cases is valid for two years. The approval granted must be exercised within that time period unless extended. M/S/C (Olsen/Hough; Mills absent) taking the following actions: CASE 3.0445. Application by OUR LADY OF SOLITUDE CHURCH for architectural approval of revised plans for a new education building for the church at 151 W. Alejo Road, C-B-D/R-4-VP Zone, Section 15. Approved subject to the following conditions: That final working drawings be returned to the AAC and Planning Commission prior to issuance of a building permit. NOTE: The AAC had the following concerns: 1. That the parapet design should be changed because of possible technical problems. 2. That windows should be added to the building. CASE 3.0324 (MINOR). Application by CHRIS MILLS for architectural approval of minor revisions to the exterior of the Liebling Building on the northeast corner of Tahquitz Way/North Palm Canyon Drive, C-B-D Zone, Section 15. Restudy noting the following: That the overall concept of the building remodel should be presented (not a piecemeal approach) . CASE 3.0469 (MINOR). Application by COUVRETTE BUILDING SYSTEM for architectural approval of a kiosk for a new drive-up ATM at the Security Pacific Bank, 750 N. Palm Canyon Drive, C-1 Zone, Section 10. Approved subject to the following conditions: October 26, 1988 PC MINUTES Page 3 CONSENT ACTION AGENDA (Continued) CASE 3.0469 (MINOR). (Continued) That the center planter island include the following landscape additions; 2-24" box size Ficus Retusa trees and ground cover (Carissa Boxwood Beauty, 1 gallon, 18 inches on centerj. Commissioner Mills entered. ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT ACTION AGENDA Approval of architectural cases is valid for two years. The approval granted must be exercised within that time period unless extended. CASE 3.0272. Application by VOSS INVESTMENT PROPERTIES for architectural approval for working drawings and minor elevation changes for retail/restaurant complex on the northeast corner of Avenida Caballeros/Tahquitz Way, C-1-AA Zone (I.L.) , Section 14. Chairman abstained; Vice-Chairman presided. Planner (Williams) stated that revisions to the site plan, windows and doors were recommended for approval by the AAC on October 24. She stated that the wall cap was deleted from the Japanese restaurant, but the other �-' buildings had no walls with tile caps; and that the east elevation is the back of the restaurant facing a service area, which is the reason for the lack of detail on that elevation. She stated that the back would be hidden by another building. M/S/C (Mills/Whitney; Lapham abstained) approving the application as sub- mitted. CASE 3.0460 (MINOR). Application by REUEL YOUNG for Palm Springs Regional Airport for architectural approval of revised plans for a 15 ft. sound wall at the north end of the Airport runway between Tamarisk Road (extended)/Tachevah Road (extended) , A Zone, Section 12. Planner (Williams) stated that the wall was restudied by the Commission, revisions were made, and the design was recommended for approval by the AAC on October 24. Commissioner Mills stated that he had requested that an acoustical study be made for a better design or different material for the 15 ft. high wall . Planning Director answered that part of the Airport Noise Study was an acoustical analysis , although the exact configuration of the wall was not defined; that because of the 7:1 glide path the wall could not be closer to the Airport; that the wall could not be lowered because of the height of jet engines; and that there was nothing in the report that indicated more effectiveness or less obtrusiveness of the design. October 26, 1988 PC MINUTES Page 4 CONSENT ACTION AGENDA (Continued) CASE 3.0460. (Continued) Commissioner Mills suggested berming between the runway and the loop road to reduce the height. He asked if berming had been addressed. Planning Director replied that the Airport Director stated that the wall could not be any closer to allow for berming and that part of the height is to build a structure that is as high as the jet engines. Commissioner Mills suggested some mounding on Farrell to soften the wall . Planning Director replied that there is no space for substantial earth work. Commissioner Olsen stated that the design should be reviewed, especially on Tachevah and Farrell . Planning Director replied that the wall is more noticeable from the airport than anywhere else; that the color scheme will be on both sides; that there will be no landscaping except inside the wall on private development (as is done for industrial areas with zero setbacks); and that the Commission could recommend landscaping (small plants such as Texas Ranger). Commissioner Hough commented that although the wall is big not much will be seen as the buildings at the airport develop; that there is no room for landscaping on Farrell , but the wall design has improved and the wall is pleasing from both sides . M/S/C (Olsen/Edgmon; Mills dissenting) approving the application subject to further study of the ends of the wall to explore mounding and/or land- scaping. NOTE: Commissioner Mills dissented feeling that an acoustical study should have been made to study other options for materials and design. PUBLIC HEARINGS CASE 5.0487-CUP. Application by ROD and DALE JOHNSON for a conditional use permit to continue operation of a public equestrian facility on the corner of Toledo Avenue/Murray Canyon Drive, PD-2, Sections 25 and 36. (Commission response to written comments on Draft Negative Declaration; no comments received; action.) Planner (Evans) stated that the application is for a CUP to continue operation of Smoketree Stables which have been in Palm Springs since 1929 and were moved in 1968 to the current location; that originally the stables were in the County which approved a 10-year permit; and that in 1970 the Council annexed the site and in 1978 a CUP was applied for and approved, which expired in 1988; and that the applicants have filed for a time v, extension without a specific time length. After presenting the prepared report (on file in the Planning Division office) , he stated that there have been many complaints received by the City and described the stables' October 26, 1988 PC MINUTES Page 5 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE 5.0487-CUP. (Continued) location and site plan on the display board. He stated that an extension of Murray Canyon Drive will be required as development occurs in Palm Canyon (which has been approved for homes) . In reply to Chairman' s question, he stated that an extension of Murray Canyon would be a full extension of the road (not just along the stable property) at the expense of the property owner as part of the CUP extension. In reply to Commission question, Planning Director stated that it is an unusual condition. In reply to Commission question, Planner stated that no information has been developed on prevailing winds on the site; but that the winds shift often and the homeowners in the area may want to comment. He stated that there are 129 homes within one-half mile and a little less than 468 homes counting the perimeter of the equestrian site. Planning Director stated that much correspondence has been received by the City with half recommending approval and half opposing the project; and that the equestrian and tourist industry are in favor and the local residents are opposed for the reasons mentioned in the staff report (odor, noise, etc.) . Chairman declared the hearing open. The following persons spoke in favor of the CUP extension: Frank Bogert, 2727 Plaimore M.A. Hoff, 2733 Anza Trail Vivian Grow, 5401 Lakeside Dan Olivier, 600 Tahquitz Gary Klein, Rancho Mirage Chris Maxwell , 1109 Mesquite Jeffry Close, 340 Desert Lakes Drive Roger Ramos, 520 Murray Canyon Drive Micky Fine, 1301 Malaga Circle Babs Shea, Sorghum Court, Cathedral City Clare Burgess, 550 Pallisades Steve Carter, DVM, La Quinta Bill Burgess, 550 Pallisades Reuel Young, 1428 Rodeo October 26, 1988 PC MINUTES Page 6 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE 5.0487-CUP. (Continued) Ted McKinney, 755 E. Sunny Dunes Theresa Berglund, Rancho Mirage John Berglund, Rancho Mirage Bill Dellars, Rancho Mirage Reasons given for approval of the CUP are as follows: - It is an adjunct of the Tribal Park. - There is only one public stable left in Palm Springs. - Palm Springs has a unique area in which to ride. - Horseback riding is an important tourist industry. Stables are an integral part of the desert riders operation (to keep riding trails open) . - The spray system and manure removal eliminates development of fly larvae. (Flies breed in the Canyon Country Club grass cuttings , not in the stables.) - Murray Road extension should not be required; is improper and not related to the application (Smoketree is a lessor, not an owner, and a legal challenge could result) . - It is a scenic area and other areas in the Valley are not as scenic. - Los Compadres Stables is far away from riding trails. - A high percentage of people seeking recreation ride horses. - Trails are of paramount importance to the area and a link through the valley for hikers and museum groups, as well as horsemen. - This location is improtant to facilitate horseback riding in the Indian Canyons. - Desert Riders need a place to stable their horses and to rent horses . - Removal of the stables will be removal of part of the history of Palm Springs . - Only 20 desert riders have their own horses , other riders use stable horses for recreation and for maintenance of the trails. - Equestrian Center location is too far away from the canyons . - Persons bought homes in the stable area knowing the stable were there. October 26, 1988 PC MINUTES Page 7 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE 5.0487-CUP. (Continued) - Horseback riding is an incentive to businessmen to take clients riding. - Stables bring revenue to the City instead of downvalley. - Stables have very important memories for children. - Stables are very clean and hygienic. - Too much importance is placed on part-time residents voicing opposition. - It would be an injustice if the permit is not approved. - Good safety record at the stables. - People are drawn to the area for what is existing and the area should not be changed. - Care of the equipment, stables , and horses is superior to all other stables. - Instead of extending Murray Canyon Drive through Smoketree, Farrell should be extended through Barona to the southeast side of the wash for circulation of traffic. (It is on General Plan.) Memories of childhood should be kept because they give the community heart. Little for teenagers to do in the area, riding is an important teenage activity. Those in opposition to the CUP were as follows: Harold Glass, 2432 Toledo Joe Turner, 2444 S. Camino Real Chopsie Samuelson, 1606 Via Estrella Jerome Factor, 1255 Via Estrella Fess Parker, 2514 Toledo/495 Santiago Way Herbert Bernstein, 1650 Murray Canyon Julius Creeker, 1680 Murray Canyon Esenta Warshil , 2384 Toledo October 26, 1988 PC MINUTES Page 8 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE 5.0487-CUP. (Continued) Reasons given in opposition are as follows: - Flies, noise, barking dogs, skunks, raccoons, coyotes, and odor problems have gotten worse. - Stables could be moved (suggested-northeast corner of the triangular property or the Tribal Park) . - Canyon South Homeowners voted 6-1 against the stables at a Board Meeting (dissenting vote was because of nostalgia) . - People away from the stables are the only ones who can afford nostalgia. - Manure odor permeates homes in the area. - Radius of Public Hearing notices should be larger than 400 ft. because the stench travels more than 400 ft. - Lowers property values because of full disclosure statement required in selling houses in the area. - People in the area asked stables to move two years ago and were ignored. - Progress forces situations to change. - The residences are in their proper zoning district; the stables are not. - Tourists not only come to ride horses; they also engage in other athletic activities. - The stables' clientele will follow the stables wherever they move. - Area is now developed and the stables have become too close to the residences . - Planning Commission has an obligation to find a compromise, such as moving the stables since the use is under a Conditional Use Permit. - Many of the riders do not live in the area; they just use the facilities. - Golfers cannot play on the Canyon Country Club Golf Course at times because of the odor. - Comfort, health and sanitation of the residents should be considered. - The applicant should be required to extend Murray Canyon. - Canyon Country Club area is in a renaissance, has set a precedent for the valley, and is one of the best areas to live in the valley. October 26, 1988 PC MINUTES Page 9 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE 5.0487-CUP. (Continued) - Palm Springs would be strengthened with another location of the stables. - Odors have increased through the years and east winds blow the odors toward nearby residences. - Homeowners were told stables were temporary and would be removed since the area was growing. - Key word is progress (development of the area) . - Original permit was for 10 years to review the use as development occurred. - Progress eliminated the other stables in the area. - Wild animals such as raccoons and coyotes are drawn to the stables. - Horse activities such as hayrides cause droppings which are not removed. - Many residents in Palm Springs are in their 80 or 90's and they prefer golf courses and tennis . - Rats are being found in the area. - Murray Canyon Drive is sometimes littered with manure. - Petition has been signed by 100 homeowners in the area in opposition. - 300 members of Canyon Country Club oppose the granting of the extension of the Conditional Use Permit. There being no further appearances; Chairman declared the hearing closed. In reply to Commission question, Planner stated that no homes were immediately abutting the stables in 1965 and building was begun in the 60's and continued into the 70's and 80's . (He showed the development of the property on the display board.) Commissioner Hough stated that tree rats are a common valley nuisance and not a result of the stables; that the stables' current location is important because of its closeness to the canyons; that most of the people purchase their homes after the stables were located; that he lives on Araby and has wild animals in the area; and that he is opposed to the extension of Murray Canyon as a condition of the Conditional Use Permit. October 26, 1988 PC MINUTES Page 10 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE 5.0487-CUP. (Continued) In reply to Commission question, Planner stated that the most recent method of control of flies and insects is biological control and was not used in the equestrian center; and that consultants in 1981 found that the odor and fly control and removal of manure at Smoketree were adequate; and that to their knowledge staff feels that the stables have the best controls possible. Commissioner Edgmon requested that staff investigate the hayrides to see if droppings are being left. She stated also that the Murray Canyon extension is inappropriate, and that living with pre-existing uses is sometimes difficult. In reply to Commission question, Traffic Engineer stated that the original JHK study showed an increase of traffic on Toledo of 112% and 183% on Barona; and that the leg would be needed by 1995 and would involve 6300 cars a day based on development in the South Palm Canyon Area. In reply to Chairman' s question, Planning Director stated that there has not been any discussion on relocation of the stables on the Smoketree stables property. Chairman stated that he was in favor of extending the CUP, but a study should be done on relocation within a specific time period. He suggested that at the end of five years a relocation plan be ready for Commission review; stated that another 10 year extension is not viable; and that the Commission should at the end of five years determine whether or not the use should stay or the stable relocated. He noted that the stable owners have an obligation to find a more compatible location; and that something should be done or a permanent permit granted. Commissioner Hough stated that he did not want the use to be eliminated in ten years. Commissioner Whitney noted that she felt that the stables should move, but there has to be access to the canyons. Chairman stated that the access to the canyons would be part of the feasibility study and perhaps the stables could be relocated along the trail line and if relocation can be accomplished, it should be. Commissioner Dotson stated that the permit should be limited to a five year extension and as a condition of approval a relocation study and analysis should be made and the total number of horses limited to 150. Commissioner Mills stated that there should not a dedication made for an extension of Murray Canyon as a condition of approval ; and that as long as the stable is operative, there should not be a road across the property. Commissioner Hough stated that he felt that a dedication requirement is improper; that the extension should be for 10 years with a relocation study since 5 years is not long enough. October 26, 1988 PC MINUTES Page 11 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE 5.0487-CUP. (Continued) Commissioner Mills asked if a consultant or expert had ever been consulted on whether of not the stables are in a state-of-the-art program regarding fly control and odor. Planner stated that the requirement is part of the mitigation measures of the project. He stated that the stables' program should be reviewed by an independent party such as an equestrian consultant. Commissioner Dotson noted that he had visited the site and was impressed by its cleanliness although he realized it was not the height of the season; that a five year extension should be adequate because of the future Tribal Council Park and also because there are viable alternative sites on the property for relocation. Commissioner Edgmon agreed, stating that the suggestion is a good compromise. Commissioner Dotson commented that the dedication should be explored along with the relocation but may not be needed t cttinftithe 5-year time frame. Motion was made by Dotson to order the filing of a negative declaration and approve CUP 5.0487 for five years subject to all conditions of staff; that the number of horses be limited to 150; and that the applicant be required to submit a feasibility study to move the stable location in 5 years. �..�' Motion died for lack of a second. M/S/C (Whitney/Edgmon; Hough dissented) approving CUP 5.0487 based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: Findings: 1. That the equestrian facility proposed and the location set forth is property one for which a conditional use permit is authorized by the Zoning Ordinance Section 9402.00 A.2.d. 2. That the public stable use is necessary and desirable for the community and has been existing at this location for the past ten years. This use is in harmony with the General Plan which indicates convenient access to the established trail system throughout the City and is not considered detrimental to adjacent residential uses which were developed subsequent to and with full knowledge of the existence of the equestrian facility. 3. That the four acre site is more than adequate in size to accommodate the continued operation of this stable facility including all walls , fences, setbacks , landscaping, greenbelts, and fly and odor control systems necessary to adjust this continuing use to the neighborhood. 4. That the site is located at the intersection of two secondary thoroughfares which are adequate in size to accommodate the amount ``' and type of traffic known to be generated by the stables. October 26, 1988 PC MINUTES Page 12 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE 5.0487-CUP. (Continued) 5. That the Planning Commission has reviewed and considered information regarding insect, odor and manure control contained in the Palm Springs Equestrian Center Final EIR. 6. That the continued operations of Smoke Tree Stables provides residents and tourists an important recreational amenity. 7. That the alternative sites have been considered by the Planning Commission. Conditions• 1. That the CUP extension is approved for a 5 year period with a feasibility study on relocation prepared within the five year period for Commission review and a decision on whether the stablesshould remain. 2. That the operation of the stables is subject to periodic review by staff and that any complaints received by staff are to be reported to the Planning Commission. 3. That the existing fly and odor control system shall be used at all times horses are present on-site. (Eight (8) times per day, one (1) minute duration or an necessary). 4. That the applicant shall investigate additional means to control " insects and odors and report back to staff within 30 days of approval . 5. That any changes to the control program listed above shall be submitted in writing for City approval . 6. That all manure be removed from the site daily. 7. That the parking area be re-surfaced and striped in accordance with current codes. 8. That all inoperable vehicles and inoperable equipment be removed from the site within 30 days of City Council approval . 9. That a landscape plan be submitted for the westerly portions of the property including the office area, parking area and entry. 10. That all recommendations contained An the Development Committee recommendations be complied with except for the requirement of dedication of land for the extension of Murray Canyon Drive. October 26, 1988 PC MINUTES Page 13 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE 5.0487-CUP. (Continued) Commissioner Hough dissented, feeling that the 5-year time period was not long enough. CASE 5.0494-CUP. Application by GLEN IVEY MANAGEMENT COMPANY (CANYON PLAZA HOTEL) for a conditional use permit to add 10 new time share units at 2601 Golf Club Drive, R-3 Zone, Section 29. (Commission response to written comments on draft Negative Declaration; no comments received; action.) Recommendation: That the Commission order the filing of a Negative Declaration and approve the CUP subject to conditions. Planner (Abbas) presented the staff report and stated that the existing restaurant area is proposed to be converted to timeshare uses which would add 10 time shares to the existing 71; and that asphalt will be removed in the front and landscaping added. She stated that parking and open space meet code requirements; that there is no covered parking; that there is no change in the footprint of the building; and that there will be no restaurant. She stated that the AAC recommend restudy of the architecture and felt that not enough information was provided to review. Chairman declared the hearing open. Chris Mills, 121 S. Palm Canyon, project architect, stated that he had submitted colored plans; that no additional square footage is being added; that excess square footage of parking will be deleted and landscaping added; that the entry will be revised; and that a snack bar with four tables will be added by the pool . He stated that there will be a delivery drive to service the laundry area and that colored plans will not show any of the existing elements, but will show the same window patterns as the 3- story hotel building. He stated that the patio has been expanded with a covered area off the patio, and that staff conditions are acceptable. Planner stated that one condition would be added by staff; that the large free-standing monument sign be removed and replaced with a sign that meets code. Mr. Mills commented that he would have to ask the owners if the condition were acceptable. Vivian Grow, 5041 Lakeside, stated that her house was there before the hotel was built; that adding 10 more families with cars, noise and loss of parking space is not acceptable to the neighborhood; and that more cars will be coming out of the many driveways along the hotel block. Chairman commented that the use should diminish since the restaurant will be eliminated. October 26, 1988 PC MINUTES Page 14 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE 5.0494-CUP. (Continued) Mrs. Grow stated that will not be the case since the restaurant was not busy and with a timeshare there will be many more people and cars. She stated that allowing a timeshare use next to an R-1 use is not right. In reply to Commission question, Planner stated that the existing project is timeshare and there is no requirement for covered parking. Planning Director explained that a time share is like a hotel use and covered parking is not required. M/S/C (Olsen/Dotson; Mills abstained; absent) approving CUP 5.0494 based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: Findings• 1. The proposed additional time share units and snack bar are properly one for which a Conditional Use Permit is authorized by the Zoning Ordinance. 2. The proposed time share units are desirable for the community, are in harmony with the General Plan and are not detrimental to the surrounding neighborhood. 3. The site, being 3.33 acres and by making use of an existing structure, can accommodate the proposed improvements. 4. The site is located on adjacent roadways which can handle the anti- cipated traffic. 5. The conditions of approval will protect the health, safety and general welfare of the neighborhood . Conditions• 1. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall demon- strate that a proper easement has been established for the use of the restroom facilities on the northerly side of the building for the patrons of the golf course adjacent to it. Said easement shall be a clearly marked path with an opening in the property line wall and a small sign indicating the availability of the restrooms . 2. The additional 10 units shall be subject to the provisions of the Municipal Code concerning Transient Occupancy Tax. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the Planning Commission shall review and approve final working drawings, including but not limited to, elevations, landscaping, site plans. The landscaping plans shall include all new landscaping and provisions for repair of all street- scape plant material and walls. 4. Plans for a working trash enclosure must be approved prior to issuance of a building permit. October 26, 1988 PC MINUTES Page 15 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE 5.0494-CUP. (Continued) 5. The illegal chain link fence at the rear of the site near the pool must be removed prior to issuance of a building permit. 6. That the large free-standing monument sign be removed and replaced with a sign that meets code. 7. That all recommendations of the Development Committee be met. TPM 23123 (REVISED). Application by ASL CONSULTING ENGINEERS for Peter McKernan for a revised tentative parcel map to combine four existing lots into two parcels on Vereda del Sur, R-1-A Zone, Section 10. (An Environmental Assessment was previously given in conjunction with the original map.) Recommendation: That the Commission approve the map subject to conditions . Planner (Abbas) stated that the map was filed in conjunction with the CUP for a large home and guest house; and that the applicant plans to raze one home and build his home and a guest house and then improve and sell the other existing home on the property. She stated that the revised map is for changes to the CUP regarding the site plan, particularly the tennis court. Planning Director stated that off-site improvements will be deferred. Planner explained that the applicant proposes to combine four parcels; and that the two parcels and the added parcel will make the combined property more square in shape. Chairman declared the hearing open. Paul Gilmore, ASL Consulting Engineers, 960 E. Tahquitz, project engineer, stated that the original map had two parcels , that the applicant is proposing a lot consolidation, and that there are no problems with the conditions. There being no further appearances; Chairman declared the hearing closed. M/S/C (Whitney/Edgmon) approving TPM 23123 based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: Findings• 1. That a parcel map is the appropriate application for a lot consolida- tion. 2. That the proposed lot consolidation is in harmony with the Zoning Ordinance and objectives of the General Plan. October 26, 1988 PC MINUTES Page 16 ` PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) TPM 23123. (Continued) 3. That the proposed lot consolidation is not detrimental to the surrounding properties or the environment. Conditions: 1. That the Development Committee conditions dated October 6, 1988 shall be implemented. PUBLIC COMMENTS: None. TPM 23288. Application by VOSS INVESTMENT PROPERTIES for a tentative parcel map for subdivision of land for commercial purposes at the northeast corner of Tahquitz Way/Avenida Caballeros , C-1-AA/R-4-VP Zone (I.L.) , Section 14. (An Environmental Assessment was previously prepared in conjunction with Case 3.0272.) Vice-Chairman presided. Recommendation: That the Commission approve the map subject to conditions: Planner (Williams) stated that staff report indicates that the Project Engineer expressed concern over dedication because of lease arrangements and wants more flexibility; that conditions eliminate a no man's land, and will satisfy the City Engineer. Vice-Chairman declared the hearing open. Paul Gilmore, ASL Consulting Engineers, project engineer, stated that the applicants want to combine the dedicated parcel and Parcels A & B for the purpose of filling requirements of the Subdivision Map Act. He stated that the lease arrangements have not been made yet, and the client needs flexibility. Planning Director explained that the parcel map is required not because of leasing or financing but to define the parcels with survey instruments since the lots were created many years ago and are not properly defined. There being no further appearances; Vice-Chairman declared the hearing closed. Commissioner Dotson asked about access on Parcel B since there is an access on Caballeros. October 26, 1988 PC MINUTES Page 17 • PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) TPM 23288. (Continued) L Planning Director explained that the vacant lot faces the Convention Center Hotel arcel and the applicants want to provide a Tahquitz access to the hotel �or any other development); and that the lease is structured so that if the underlying leasee takes back Parcel B they will provide parking on the north parcel . He stated that the subdivision will not make a flag lot and that access does not have to be provided to Tahquitz Way by the City. M/S/C (Hough/Dotson; Lapham abstained) approving the map based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: Findings• 1. That the site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate proposed developments of the C-1-AA or R-4-UP Zones. 2. That the lot sizes meet the minimum development standards provided Parcel B is designated for access purposes only. 3. That the proposed subdivision will not have an adverse environmental effect. 4. That the proposed subdivision is in accordance with the objectives of the General Plan. Conditions• 1. That the Development Committee conditions dated October 17, 1988 shall apply. TRIBAL COUNCIL COMMENTS This Case was reviewed by the Tribal Council at its Tribal Council Meeting of October 25, 1988. After consideration of the recommendations of the Indian Planning Commission, the Tribal Council took the following actions: 1. Concurred with the findings contained in Planned Commission Staff Report dated October 26, 1988. 2. Approved Tentative Parcel Map No. 23288 subject to the conditions recommended in Development Committee Minutes of October 17, 1988. October 26, 1988 PC MINUTES Page 18 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS TIME EXTENSION - CASE 5.0315-CUP/CASE 3.582. Request by LINDEN CONSTRUCTION, �•.� INC. for a retroactive 12 month time extension of a conditional use permit and architectural case for a condominium hotel project on Baristo Road east of Avenida Caballeros, R-4 Zone (I .L.) , Section 14. Planner (Abbas) explained that the applicant are late in applying for a time extension and making it retroactive will make the expiration date February 11, 1989. Commissioner Whitney asked staff to inform Commission of development on the adjacent property. M/S/C (Olsen/Edgmon) approving a twelve-month time extension subject to all original conditions of approval . The expiration date will be February 11, 1989. TRIBAL COUNCIL COMMENTS This case was reviewed by the Tribal Council at its Tribal Council Meeting of October 25, 1988. After consideration of the recommendations of the Indian Planning Commission, the Tribal Council took the following actions: 1. Noted there were extenuating legal circumstances that delayed con- struction of the project. 2. Approved the granting of a retroactive 12-month time extension for CASE 5.0315-CUP subject to the original Conditions of approval . 3. In keeping with its policy of not considering architectural approval items, the Tribal Council withheld comments on Case 3.582. CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS. Update of City Council actions. - CASE 5.0486-CZ. Council approved change from R-G-A(8) to R-4 on Caballeros and Amado. - CASE 6.363 (Berkowitz). Council upheld the Commission denial of the variance in light standard heights. - CASE 6.361 (Marino). Council upheld the Commission denial of the variance. - Joint Council PC/AAC Dinner Meetin Will be November 7, 6:30 p.m. in the Plaza Resort Hotel , Plaza "C" Room details to follow) . October 26, 1988 PC MINUTES Page 19 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS (Continued) COMMISSION/STAFF REPORTS OR REQUESTS. Architects and AAC Membership Period. Some interest from architects for membership on the AAC on a rotating basis. APA Conference. American Planning Conference at the Marquis Hotel from October 23 - 26 was very successful . Most of the Planners from the State liked the town and the conference seminars. Commissioner Dotson thanked staff for their efforts during the conference. Palm Springs Classic. Commissioner Dotson requested a presentation and drawing of the proposal and asked that staff express Commission concerns to the Council . He stated that a report has been generated by SENCA (a consultant) which no one has seen. Planning Director stated the report was on the feasibility issue, and that there is no concrete plan. Senca is assigning its responsibilities to Kanter, Incorporated. Another developer is interested in the same land uses in the Chino Cone which has a 10% slope and not enough flat land available for a golf course, and would require much cut and fill . There are questions regarding agreements with SENCA but the Redevelopment Director wants to include the Commission in a positive way but is not getting much support to slow down; and that it is too early to review a physical plan since there is presently no site. He stated that the feasibility study includes a resort hotel and eliminates the sports arena; high end residential instead of corporate pads; and that also there is an airport noise problem to be considered. Chairman stated that high end residential will probably not be appropriate. Commissioner Dotson requested copies of the feasibility study for the Commission. - Tennis Court Lights. Review will be on an upcoming Commission Study Session agenda. - Palm Trees on Indian Avenue. Commissioner Olsen stated that the palm tree landscaping along Indian Avenue has improved the area. - City/County Conference. Will be held November 3 in Redlands. Deadline for reservations is October 27. - Abandoned Cars Issue. Will be on an upcoming Commission study session agenda. Planning Director stated that only salvagable cars are presently being towed. ADDED STARTERS. (Determination of eligibility for consideration.) None. October -2.6, 1.988 PC MINUTES Page 20 ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Chairman adjourned the meeting at 4:40 p.m. PLAN ING DIRE OR MDR/ml _— _ rr 6irra � �� ■ PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Council Chamber, City Hall • November 9, 19$8 1:30 p.m. ROLL CALL F-Y 1988 - 1989 Present Present Excused Absences Planning Commission This Meeting to Date to Date Larry Lapham, Chairman X 8 2 Gary Olsen - 8 2 Barbara Whitney X 8 2 Brent Hough X 8 2 Martha Edgmon X 9 1 Chris Mills - 7 1 Michael Dotson X 7 0 Staff Present Marvin D . Roos , Planning Director Siegfried Siefkes , Assistant City Attorney Sherri Abbas , Planner Margo Williams, Planner Douglas Evans , Planner John Terell , Redevelopment Planner Dave Forcucci , Zoning Enforcement Dean Lewis, Traffic Engineer "Mary E. Lawler, Recording Secretary • Architectural Advisory Committee - November 7, 1988 Brent Hough , Chairman Absent: Tom Doczi Mill Kleindienst Mike Buccino William Johnson Reuel Yauna Chairman called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. M/S/C (Whitney/Hough; Mills/Olsen absent) approving minutes of October 19, 1988 with the fallowing correction: Location of meeting: Large Conference Room; and approving the minutes of October 26, 1988, with the following corrections: See Attachment A. ADMINISTRATIVE NOTE: There were no Tribal Council Comments . • REPORT OF POSTING AGENDA: The November 9, 1988 agenda was available for public access at the City Hall exterior bulletin board and the Planning Division Counter by 1 :30 p.m. , Friday, November 4, 1988.