Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1988/06/22 - MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES ` Council Chamber, City Hall June 22, 1989 1 :30 p.m. ROLL CALL F-Y 1987 - 1988 Present Present Excused Absences Planning Commission This Meeting to Date to date Larry Lapham, Chairman X 20 3 Hugh Curtis - 22 1 Martha Edgmon X 21 2 Brent Hough X 22 1 Gary Olsen X 20 3 Barbara Whitney - 17 6 Staff Present Marvin D. Roos, Planning Director Siegfried Siefkes, Assistant City Attorney Dave Forcucci , Zoning Enforcement Margo Williams, Planner Douglas Evans, Planner Dean Lewis, Traffic Engineer Bob Harris, Zoning Enforcement Officer Mary E. Lawler, Recording Secretary Architectural Advisory Committee - June 20, 1988 Chris Mills, Chairman Absent: Gary Olsen, Alternate William Johnson Barbara Whitney, Alternate .,, Brent Hough Martha Edgmon, Alternate Tom Doczi Will Kleindienst Mike Buccino Chairman called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. M/S/C (Olsen/Hough; Whitney/Curtis absent) approving minutes of June 8, 1988 corrected as follows: DISCUSSION, DISCUSSION (Tree Trimming) , Page 12, last paragraph. Delete "Olsen/Whitney absent". ADMINISTRATIVE NOTE: There were no Tribal Council comments. REPORT OF POSTING AGENDA: The June 22 agenda was available for public access at the City Hall exterior bulletin board and the Planning Division Counter by 1:30 p.m., Friday, June 17. June 22, 1988 PC MINUTES Page 2 CONSENT ACTION AGENDA Approval of architectural cases is valid for two years. The approval granted must be exercised within that time period unless extended. M/S/C (Edgmon/Olsen; Curtis/Whitney absent) taking the following actions: CASE 3.0010. Application by WESSMAN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY for architectural approval of revised landscape plans for 104-unit apartment complex on Belardo Road/Morongo Road, R-3 Zone (I .L.) , Section 22. Approved subject to the following conditions: That 75% of the trees in the parking lot are to be 24" box or greater in size. CASE 3.0346. Application by DENNIE AUSTIN for architectural approval of revised plans for single family residence on Vista Drive/Via Livornio, R-1-B Zone, Section 3. Continued to July 13 at the applicant's request. CASE 3.0406 (MINOR) . Application by GREAT WALL INTERSTATE INC. for architectural approval of new awning, exterior lights and dining patio for restaurant at 362 S. Palm Canyon Drive, C-B-D Zone, Section 15. Restudy noting the following: 1. That the patio be enclosed and accessible from restaurant; such access should be separate from the main entry. 2. That a landscaping plan be submitted; landscaping, rather than wrought iron, should be used to form edges of patio. 3. That alternate access be provided between Liquor Barn and Thrifty parking lots. 4. That raceway lights not be used. 5. That the awning structure be more substantial to be consistent with architecture of existing building; details shall be submitted. 4-0 vote. CASE 5.0344-PD-164. Application by PERIDIAN GROUP for architectural approval of revised landscape plans for the frontage of the Wyndham Hotel on Tahquitz Way between Calle E1 Segundo/Avenida Caballeros, C-1-AA/R-4-VP Zone (I .L.) , Section 14. Continued to July 13 at the applicant' s request. June 22, 1988 PC MINUTES Page 3 CONSENT ACTION AGENDA SIGN APPLICATION. Application by PLASTOLITE for architectural approval of revised plans for main sign change of face for the Travelodge Hotel at 333 E. Palm Canyon Drive, R-3 Zone, Section 26. Continued to July 13, 1988 pending receipt of revised plans. SIGN APPLICATION. Application by IMPERIAL SIGN COMPANY for architectural approval of main identification sign for B. Dalton Software at 123 N. Palm Canyon Drive, C-B-D Zone, Section 15. Approved as submitted. SIGN APPLICATION. Application by LIQUOR BARN for architectural approval of change of two main identification signs to monument signs for the Liquor Barn at 350 S. Palm Canyon Drive, C-B-D Zone, Section 15. Approved subject to the following conditions: 1. That the copy be reduced in size and the upper portion of the alignment reduced in order to reduce the overall height of the sign. 2. That the letter style be changed to match existing. ti... 3. That the background color be changed to rust. 4. That there be a matte finish on all surfaces. 5. That the landscaping be revised and submitted to staff for approval . 6. That property maintenance be underway prior to issuance of sign permits. CASE 3.0191. Application by GREAT AMERICAN MINI STORAGE for architectural approval of a revised entry gate for office/warehouse buildings on Farrell Drive/Research Drive, M-1-P Zone, Section 12. Continued to July 13, 1988 pending revised plans. ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT ACTION AGENDA Approval of architectural cases is valid for two years. The approval granted must be exercised within that time period unless extended. CASE 3.0389 (MINOR) . Application by GALLERY APARTMENTS for architectural approval of security gates for apartment complex at 1488 E. Ramon Road, R-2 Zone (I .L.) , Section 14. June 22, 1988 PC MINUTES Page 4 ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT ACTION AGENDA (Continued) CASE 3.0389 (MINOR) . (Continued) Planner (Evans) stated that staff concerns include the gate' s conflict with the driveway and the limited turnaround area. He stated that the Traffic Engineer recommends pulling the gates back for a deeper turnaround; that the project was built before there were parking standards for guest parking, and complaints have been received about restricted guest parking; that parking will be removed from Ramon in the future; that staff recommends that additional parking be provided for guests which is a concern of the applicant because of the cost; and that the gates restrict the entry without adequate turnaround. Commissioner Olsen commented that security is a good idea, but that the gate design should be reviewed. Planning Director stated that the item was removed from the consent agenda to discuss the concept of adding guest parking even though there is no ordinance requirement, that the security system would preclude using all of the parking, and that added guest parking should be a condition. He stated that consideration could be given to designing one of the entries to coordinate with the adjacent commercial project (shopping center on the west) to combine driveways and an offset mechanism provided to remove cars from the street. He requested Commission direction on the guest parking condition. Roger Latille, Access Controls, the security company, stated that he was not the property owner, but since the owner (Dr. Bochner) was out of the country, he would convey the information that Dr. Bochner feels that guest parking should not be added since it was not an original condition of approval and the expense is too great. Mr. Latille stated that the area that would be costly to remove is landscaping, and that the owner needs security because of vandalism and car theft which makes him lose renters. Planner (Evans) stated that three parking spaces have been converted to a storage room and should be returned to parking. Chairman commented that parking will be removed from Ramon and the only chance to provide adequate parking on the project is through the subject application. He added that guest parking should be provided and that the owner should not ignore the fact that guest parking is needed. Commissioner Edgmon commented that the tight turnaround area is an impossible situation. M/S/C (Edgmon/Olsen; Whitney/Curtis absent) for continuance to July 13 for a detailed site plan and noting the following recommendations: 1. That the concept is workable. 2. That larger scale, more detailed plans (drawn to scale) of the entry area be submitted. 3. That a landscape plan indicating the revisions be submitted. 4. That photos of the entry and exit areas be submitted. June 22, 1988 PC MINUTES Page 5 ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT ACTION AGENDA (Continued) CASE 3.0389 (MINOR) . (Continued) 5. That signs for the entry and exit areas are to be reviewed under separate permit. 6. That additional parking be provided on the site. 7. That a workable entry and turn around be designed. CASE 5.0463-PD-195. Application by DESERT SUN for architectural approval of final development plans for a planned development district to construct a newspaper publishing facility including a portion at a 50 ft. building height on Gene Autry Trail between Tachevah Road/Ramon Road, M- 1-P Zone, Section 7. Planner (Evans) stated that the item was removed from the Consent Agenda for clarification regarding the requirements of the new Zoning Ordinance; that the applicant will probably pay an in-lieu fee instead of providing public art on side; that property lines need to be reviewed in conjunction with landscape plans; that there should be more thickness on the monument sign adjacent to Gene Autry Trail ; that no other conditions to update the ordinance are necessary; and that the AAC recommended approval . Commissioner Olsen asked about the public art requirement not being provided on site. Planning Director explained that a fee is paid for art to be placed somewhere in the City but not on site and that the fee is 1% of the project valuation up to one million dollars and .2% in excess of one million dollars. David Christian, project architect, 1000 S. Palm Canyon Drive, stated that revising the thickness of the sign is no problem, the recommended changes to the project are acceptable, and that as soon as the project is approved by the City Plan Checker, construction will begin. M/S/C (Olsen/Hough; Whitney/Curtis absent) approving, the application subject to the following conditions: 1. That the working drawings are approved subject to staff comments and conditions. 2. That the landscape plan be restudied. June 22, 1988 PC MINUTES Page 6 ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT ACTION AGENDA (Continued) CASE 3.0407 (Minor) . Application by OCOTILLO LODGE for architectural approval of relocation of water heaters and exposed plumbing at 1111 E. Palm Canyon Drive, R-3 Zone, Section 26. Planner (Williams) explained that the plumbing on the building was placed outside and the City stopped the work; that the exposed plumbing is on the two story elements on East Palm Canyon; and that the AAC recommended denial by a 4-0 vote. Planning Director explained that the applicants said that they would attend the meeting; that they did not like the recommendations; and that Commission should know the nature of the changes (which are sub- standard) and a firm action taken by the Commission. Planner explained that the screening for the exposed pipe is a sheet metal band which will form a stripe around the building, but sheet metal against "tongue and groove" siding is incompatible and installation will be very difficult. Chairman commented that there are many ways to hide the plumbing and the solution choosn is the worst. M/S/C (Hough/Olsen; Whitney/Curtis absent) denying the application. PUBLIC HEARINGS CASE 5.0472-CUP (Continued) . Application by MARJORIE TAFT for Choon Yoo for a conditional use permit for an international wine and liquor store at 490 S. Palm Canyon Drive, C-B-D Zone, Section 15. (This action is categorically exempt from Environmental assessment per CEQA guidelines.) Planner (Williams) stated that the liquor department is one of several departments proposed in the complex; that there are several alternatives to resolve the lack of parking; that 1984 improvements to the parking lot to add 31 spaces has not been done; that the project is deficient 7 spaces; that parking could be provided in lieu or square footage reduced in the liquor store and restaurant; and that concerns have been expressed by local groups on the appropriateness of the use in the downtown and were clearly stated at the June 15 Planning Commission study session by various groups. Chairman declared the hearing open. Marjorie Taft, leasing agent for the project, stated that the City's revised conditions have been reviewed and accepted except for condition #2 (hours of operation) . She stated that Mr. Kim, the applicant, is requesting the liquor store to be open until at least 10 p.m. because the restaurant will be open until that time; that the liquor store would be open the hours of the operation of the other businesses; and that the `"'' business complex would not be open until all stores are leased. June 22, 1988 PC MINUTES Page 7 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE 5.0472-CUP. (Continued) John Wessman, 72200 Clancy Lane, Rancho Mirage, stated that the City should not try to regulate the businesses except for the liquor store since the marketplace will determine their success. Sidney Kim, the applicant, stated that he appreciated the comments of the Commission; that the plan is for the entire building with the liquor store as part of the whole concept; that the liquor store use could be removed if the Commission feels that it is not good for the whole concept; and that he would cooperate with any advice or counseling. Monty Lukov, executive director, DBIA, stated that Mr. Wessman spoke for Palm Springs NOW; that the DBIA had met with the applicants; and that the organization does not want to dictate the types of businesses in the complex, but voted against the liquor store; that Palm Springs NOW and Main Street request controls on liquor license and the DBA wants the license denied. There being no further appearances, Chairman declared the meeting closed. Chairman explained that the Commission cannot determine the type of businesses in the project, except for the liquor store; that the marketplace will determine whether or not the liquor store is successful ; and that the CUP for the liquor store can be reviewed at any time. Assistant City Attorney stated that conditions of approval should have a condition to review the CUP, otherwise action on the CUP would not be taken unless the application is in violation. He later stated that condition #3 regarding review of the CUP requires review on a complaint basis which does allow the CUP to be reviewed when complaints occur. Commissioner Hough stated that if the retail stores close at 10 p.m. the liquor store should too; and the store should stay open only during the hours of the other businesses in the complex. Commissioner Olsen stated that the appearance of the liquor store should be pleasing; and that he does not want a neighborhood market selling sundries. He asked that staff review the concerns about the functioning of the liquor store so that it does not become "just another liquor store" . Chairman stated that he did not know how the Commission could tell the applicant what he can sell . Planning Director stated that there are uses allowed and not allowed and a convenience store is not allowed in the CUP Zone. He stated that there is thin line between a convenience store and a liquor store and that a wide variety of groceries is not allowed in a liquor store because then it would become a convenience store. He said that store guidelines should be that the items for sale are upscale. Commissioner Edgmon stated that she has a problem with the liquor store in the downtown. June 22, 1988 PC MINUTES Page 8 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE 5 .0472-CUP. (Continued) Planning Director replied that is the reason for a CUP. Commissioner Olsen requested that the applicants comment on their visualization of the store. Ms. Taft explained that the intent is to have a chaucuterie which is a store that sells imported wines, liquors, packaged food and deli items with international favor and these are compatible with the rest of the store. She stated that there will be packaged foods and other items such as pasta. Chairman commended that the intent seems to fall into the realm of what is not allowed in the CBD. Planning Director explained that a significant range of items is acceptable but more time is needed to define the list. Commissioner Olsen stated that the items to be sold should be addressed; that the international flavor is a good concept and that control should be under a CUP to eliminate any problems in the future. Ms. Taft stated that Mr. Kim had visited Fashion Island in San Diego to get ideas, she requested that the store types be resolved with staff. Mr. Kim stated that the liquor store would be reduced to 2,000 sq. ft. in response to Commissioner Edgmon's feeling that the original square footage of 2,500 sq. ft. is too much. M/S/C (Hough/Olsen; Curtis/Whitney absent, Edgmon dissented) approving CUP 5.0472 based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: Findings 1 . That the use proposed is one for which a conditional use permit is authorized by the Zoning Ordinance. 2. That the proposed use is in harmony with the Zoning Ordinance and the objectives of the General Plan. 3. That the proposed use is compatible with existing and future land uses. 4. That the proposed site is served by Ramon Road, Indian Avenue, and Palm Canyon Drive, all major thoroughfare which are of adequate capacity to serve the site. 5. That the site can accommodate the proposed use provided additional parking is supplied. June 22, 1988 PC MINUTES Page 9 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE 5.0472-CUP. (Continued) Conditions 1. That a revised parking lot plan be submitted for the installation of parking spaces as required under Case 5.0321-CUP. 2. That in lieu payment of parking fees in the amount of $9,250.00 per space be provided for seven (7) spaces. 3. That all signs be subject to separate review and approval . 4. That the liquor department operation not exceed 15% of the total floor area of the building. 5. That the hours of operation not extend beyond 12 midnight and shall not operate at hours different from the overall retail operation. 6. That the use be subject to review by the planning Commission on a complaint basis, and the Commission reserves the right to add or modify conditions. 7. That any change in the type of liquor licensing be subject to review and approval by the Planning Commission. 8. That the area of window display of merchandise not exceed by percentage the overall floor area percentage of each department. `.r 9. That a minimum of 50% of the floor area be maintained in other uses to maintain the liquor store operation. 10. That no separate entrance shall be allowed for the liquor operations. 12. That staff and applicant develop a list of merchandise to be sold in the liquor store. CASE 5.0406-PD-183. Application by JOHN WESSMAN for a planned development district to construct a mixed use complex in commercial , retail , and office space on Sunrise Way between Ramon Road/Sunny Dunes Road, R-G-A-8 Zone, Section 23. (Commission response to written comments on draft Negative Declaration; action.) Recommendation: That the Commission ordered the filing of a Negative Declaration and approve the application subject to conditions. Planner (Evans) gave a brief history of the project and stated that it had been sent back by Council with the proposed carwash eliminated. He stated that an Environmental Assessment was done on the original project in 1985 �... which recommended that high traffic generators be restricted on the property and that these uses include liquor stores, paint stores, take-out restaurants, and banks; and that the Traffic Engineer indicates that there June 22, 1988 PC MINUTES Page 10 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE 5.0406-PD-183. (Continued) are minor benefits to restricting high traffic generators. He stated that staff recommends restricting these uses to buildings A and B to eliminate high traffic generators from the corner. He explained that the Traffic Engineer's recommendation included full street improvements along Ramon, widening of the flood control channel and possibly restricting egress and ingress, and elimination of some parking spaces at the entry. He stated that the conditions include deferrment of the expansion of the Baristo Channel , construction of an 8 foot combination sidewalk/bikepath along Sunrise Way, and a raised island on Sunrise and Ramon to eliminate left turn egress and ingress. He stated that one letter was received from the owners of Ramon Trailer Park stating that the project is an asset to the neighborhood and that staff recommends solid landscape screening be included in the final development plans for protection to the trailer park. He that the primary entry is on Sunrise and secondary on Ramon; that the applicant will make minor changes to the architecture to allow display windows on one side of the building; and that minor changes have been made in the parking layout by eliminating a portion of the buildings and adding parking. Chairman declared the hearing open. John Wessman, 72200 Clancy Lane, Rancho Mirage, stated that 700 sq. ft. have been removed from one of the buildings to reduce parking requirements; that he was concerned about restricting the uses on the project over and above restrictions of the CDN Zone especially in regard to uses in the freestanding building. He stated that he felt that it would make no difference in traffic because of location of the uses; that high generation uses are not detrimental to the project because of mitigative measures; and that the project would have to be redesigned if the uses were restricted in the freestanding building. He stated that he felt that if a median is required on Sunrise Way it should be paid for by development across the street which will probably not ever develop to its ultimate, because of the cost of buying right-of-way. He stated that it was not fair for him to have to move the flood control channel and requested that the condition be clarified. He stated that he felt either a hydrology study or a soil study is sufficient, but that both should not be required; and that he will submit a parcel map for leasing purposes in the future. He requested clarification on flood control fees since he felt that part of the drainage fees should go toward the cost of the bridge widening. He questioned the necessity of a sewer study and asked if it is required on all projects since he does not know who his tenants will be and he does not want to be required to do a study. He requested that a meandering sidewalk/bikepath be allowed instead of a straight path along Ramon and Sunrise Way. He objected to the restriction of uses as outlined by staff for buildings A and B and stated that the provision for public art is acceptable provided he helps choose the art. He requested that delivery hours be allowed from 6 a.m, to 10 p.m. instead of 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. since he felt that the neighbors' privacy would not be infringed upon because of the heavy landscape screening on that side. He also questioned the necessity of an armed security guard on the construction site because it is an undue expense. (Planning Director explained that it is an ordinance requirement and other projects have complied with the requirement.) June 22, 1988 PC MINUTES Page 11 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE 5.0406-PD-183. (Continued) There being no further appearances; Chairman declared the hearing closed. Planner (Evans) addressed Mr. Wessman's concerns as follows: Restriction of uses. Neighborhood shopping centers are larger than the proposed projecf--aFF parking standards are taken from figures generated by a larger project. A 3-acre shopping center in that same classification may have a higher turnover of cars since the uses may have higher turnover than standard neighborhood shopping center uses. Staff recommends that they be allowed but not at the corner. Chairman stated that if applicant applies for a use on the corner an amended planned development application is required. The restriction of uses in the condition can be deleted and a revised PD condition submitted. Mr. Wessman stated that the amended PD would be acceptable since he needs flexibility and that a 25% restriction of the total gross floor area to food services defeats the proposed restaurant use. Planner explained that the 25% condition was written when the project was under parking requirements of mixed use development, but with an amended planned development district the parking requirements can be those of a CDN Zone, but that too much restaurant space might cause a problem. Hydrology and Soil Reports. Recommendation of the City Engineer. Mr. �- Wessman stated that the project is next to the Baristo Wash and flood water can be drained directly into the wash. Sunrise Way/Baristo Channel . Mr. Wessman stated that he might not be able to get financing if there is a condition for undetermined future construction. - Median Island on Sunrise Way. Chairman asked about the island. Traffic Engineer stated that there is a tentative proposal since a median island concept for the entire City is being reviewed. Mr. Wessman stated that he should be obligated to pay only one-half of the cost of the median. Chairman commented that widening of Sunrise for a median will never happen because of the cost of obtaining the necessary right-of-way. - Bike Path/Sidewalk. Traffic Engineer stated that there is no problem with the applicant's request for a meandering sidewalk/bikepath combination. Planner stated that the condition would be changed before the project is sent to Council . Drainage Plan. Chairman suggested that the drainage plan be reviewed to deduct some of the applicant's cost of altering the wash. Mr. Wessman asked that the deduction be recommended to Council because he will discuss it with the Council . Sewer Study. Staff recommends that this be done because of the Indian Zoning changes in Section 14. There may be a compacity problem in the sewer mains close to the sewer plant. Other studies have shown parallel or relief lines would solve the problem but the subject site has not been June 22, 1988 PC MINUTES Page 12 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE 5.0406-PD-183. (Continued) included in the studies. City Engineer does not want to burden one of the main sewer lines. Most of the data is available and the boilerplate condition protects the City. Chairman suggested that the City Engineer and the Project Engineer compare data and determine the impact only from the subject project. He stated that major hotels in Section 14 have done sewer studies. Mr. Wessman stated that the condition should read that input from the subject project will be placed in existing studies. - Delivery Hours. Commissioner Edgmon stated that delivery hours of 6 a.m. to 10 p.m. may disturb the mobilehome park to the west. Mr. Wessman stated that 6 a.m, to 9 p.m. would be acceptable. Commissioner Edgmon replied that 6 a.m, is too early. Mr. Wessman explained that the deliveries will be away from the residences and the area is heavily landscaped. Commissioner Hough stated that 9 p.m. is better than 10 p.m. Street Improvements . One-half the cost is consistent with half street improvements. The Baristo Channel and Sunrise Way and Ramon are different issues from the Master Plan for Drainage regarding fees, but the City Engineer makes conditions on drainage improvements. Traffic Engineer stated that an upgrade would be only where land abuts the bridge and would be at a future date. Sunrise Way. Mr. Wessman stated that landscaping is 28 feet from the curb to parking with a meandering sidewalk and bike path and berming and possibly a low wall with a lowered parking area. Planner stated that the the curb is at 36 feet, not 32 feet, so there is only 14 ft. of right-of- way and a 10 ft. setback which is 24 ft. of landscaping and bikepath and if the curb is moved back the space will become even more restricted. Mr. Wessman replied that the project is not parked to the curb. - Twenty-five Percent Food Service Restriction. Mr. Wessman stated that if the condition is approved, the original plan will have to be reactivated showing 35,500 sq. ft. under mixed use standards. He requested that mixed use standards be allowed with the plan to be resolved with staff. M/S/C (Edgmon/Hough; Curtis/Whitney absent) ordering the filing of a Negative Declaration and approving PD-183 based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions Findings 1 . That the use applied for, a neighborhood shopping center, is properly one for which a Planned Development District is authorized by the Zoning Ordinance and the General Plan implementation guidelines for this property. 2. That the 3.1 acre site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use, including yards, setbacks, walls, landscaping, parking, and other features required to adjust the use to existing and permitted future uses of land in the neighborhood. June 22, 1988 PC MINUTES Page 13 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE 5.0406-PD-183. (Continued) 3. That the traffic generated by this development will not adversely affect adjacent roadways and that specific conditions of approval , including street widening, bridge widening, driveway modifications, and traffic signal modifications have been imposed to mitigate impacts. 4. That the proposed neighborhood shopping center is desirable for the development of the community and is not deterimental to existing uses or to future uses specifically permitted in the neighborhood. 5. That the proposed Planned Development District is consistent with the Neighborhood Shopping Center General Plan designation. 6. That the site is bounded by public roadways and a flood control facility. 7. That the subject site combined with the existing and future Neighborhood Shopping Center properties located on the northwest corner of Sunrise Way and Ramon Road will provide 13 acres of shopping facilities in this neighborhood. 8. That conditions of approval prohibit and restrict certain types of uses to reduce traffic volumes and protect the character of the neighborhood. �- Conditions 1. That PD-183 operate in compliance with the provisions of Section 9210.00. Designated Neighborhood Shopping Center Zone. Specific uses permitted by right of zone, by land use and conditional use shall apply, except the following conditions shall be added: a. That automobile service stations be prohibited. b. That food service uses be limited to no more than 25% of the total gross floor area of the project site. Additional food service use may be permitted upon approval of the Planning Commission. 2. That parking facilities and drives shall be designed and improved in accordance with Section 9306.00 OFF-STREET PARKING. In addition, the following site plan modifications shall be provided: a. A minimum 20-25 foot setback from curb shall be provided to the first parking space. b. That access should be provided to the trash enclosure located within Building "A" . C. That a 2-4 space parking deficiency for Phase I is approved. At the time Phase II is submitted, the City reserves the right to require the project to comply with the number of parking spaces required by Section 9306.00. June 22, 1988 PC MINUTES Page 14 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE 5.0406-PD-183. (Continued) 3. That Section 9311.00 PUBLIC ART of the Zoning Ordinance shall be complied with. Compliance with this condition shall be demonstrated during review of the Final Planned Development District. 4. That final landscape plans shall be approved by the Riverside County Agricultural Commissioner's office prior to Planning Commission approval . 5. That a solid landscape buffer shall be constructed and maintained adjacent to the west and south property lines. 6. That the future building site shall be submitted under an amended P.D. in accordance with Section 9403.00 of the Zoning Ordinance. 7. That final development plans, including site plan, building elevations, floor plans, roof plans, sign program, grading plan, and exterior material board shall be submitted in accordance with Section 9403.00 of the Zoning Ordinance. 8. That the delivery of goods and merchandise shall be limited to the hours of 6 a.m, through 9 p.m. 9. That all recommendations of the Development Committee as amended be implemented. TTM 23557. Application by JOHN HACKER for Kenneth Hinsvark for a tentative tract map to allow subdivision of 20 acres into seven lots on the southside of Camino Parocela between Fern Canyon Road/Belardo Road, W-R-1-A Zone, Section 22. (Commission response to written comments on draft Negative Declaration; action.) Recommendation: That the Commission continue the application to July 13. Planner (Williams) stated that requests had been received from the applicant, Tribal Council and the AAC for continuance. Chairman declared the hearing open, there being no appearances, the hearing was closed. M/S/C (Edgmon/Olsen; Curtis/Whitney absent) continuing the application to July 13. PUBLIC COMMENTS - None. June 22, 1988 PC MINUTES Page 15 ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL ITEMS Approval of architectural cases is valid for two years. The approval granted .., must be exercised within that time period unless extended. CASE 3.0401 (MINOR) . Application by NORMA FREUND and ROBERT BRISTER for architectural approval of screen installation on balcony edge at 958 and 974 Village Square North, R-4 Zone (I .L.) , Section 14. Planning Director explained that the application is for screening at the Village Racquet Club at Baristo and Caballeros; that two units have screened their balconies in an area which cannot be seen from the street; and that staff recommends Commission review of the installations on the project; and if the Commission approves the installations, they should become prototypes. M/S/C (Olsen/Hough; Whitney/Curtis absent) continuing the application to July 13 for a field trip individually by the AAC and Commission. CASE 5.0277-PD-149. Application by CHRIS MILLS for St. Theresa's Church for architectural approval of a revised master plan and final landscape plans for a church addition located on Ramon Road between Compadre Road/Farrell Drive, R-1-A Zone, Section 13. Planning Director explained that the landscape plans were for buildings now under construction and the revised Master Plan for new classroom buildings shows that buildings will all relate architecturally and improvements completed along Compadre and Vaquero. M/S/C (Edgmon/Olsen; Whitney/Curtis absent) approving the application subject to the following conditions: 1. That detailed final landscape irrigation, and exterior lighting plans be reviewed by staff and AAC. 2. That all recommendations of the Development Committee be implemented. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS LAND USE PERMIT (LUP) 20/20 RECYLCING CENTER (Cont'd.) . Request by 20/20 RECYCLING CENTER for reconsideration of conditions for recycling center at Safeway/Rimrock Shopping Center, 4733 E. Palm Canyon Drive, C-D-N Zone, Section 30. M/S/C (Olsen/Hough; Whitney/Curtis absent) tabling the application. June 22, 1988 PC MINUTES Page 16 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS (Continued) CASE 3.964. Request for by CRAIG SAVAGE for a twelve-month time extension for a 4-plex building on the southeast corner of Calle de Carlo/El Paseo Road, R- 2 Zone, Section 19. M/S/C (Olsen/Edgmon; Whitney/Curtis absent) approving a twelve-month time extension subject to all original conditions of approval . The new expira- tion date will be January 22, 1989. DISCUSSION. PLANNING COMMISSION discussion of restaurant/nightclub/cocktail use in the Palm Springs Mall on Farrell Drive between Tahquitz-McCallum Way/ Baristo Road, C-S-C Zone, Section 13. (Ref. Case 3.960.) Planning Director stated that the request for a nightclub/restaurant/ cocktail lounge use came from the Palm Springs Mall , that the revised Zoning Ordinance omitted nightclub uses as an oversight under a CUP in the CSC Zone; and that the CUP provision will be placed back into the ordinance unless the Commission indicates otherwise. Commissioner Hough stated that the CUP is a necessary mechanism to control the use and that he has some concerns about the proximity of the project to the high school . John Kastner, Manager of the Palm Springs Mall , stated that the project will be exciting for the Mall , that hours will be from noon to 12:30 a.m. or 1:00 a.m., there will be a sports lounge and that the Mall will comply with security requirement regarding the high school . Commissioner Hough asked if the project were too close to the high school to have liquor. Planning Director replied that if the school district protests the liquor license, there could be a problem; and that the applicant should discuss the project with the school district before applying for a license. Chairman suggested that the hours of operation also be discussed with the school district. Mr. Kastner explained they have had discussions with the school district which were positive and that the lobby will be a sports bar enclosed within a nightclub which seats 300 and has a stage, and that high quality acts will be booked. Robert Ritchey, architect, Palm Desert, stated that the term "nightclub" has been used, but that the facility is an exciting project and similar to the Ice House in Pasadena which is a comedy/magic type of center; and that liquor will be dispensed, but is not the main use, and that the location is left of the main Mall entrance on Farrell Drive. (The item was placed on the agenda for discussion only. Consensus of the Commission was that the concept is acceptable.) June 22, 1988 PC MINUTES Page 17 LAND USE PERMIT (LUP) 20/20 RECYLCING CENTER. Request for by 20/20 RECYCLING CENTER for reconsideration of conditions for recycling center at Safeway/Rimrock Shopping Center, 4733 E. Palm Canyon Drive, C-D-N Zone, Section 30. M/S/C (Olsen/Hough; Whitneyy/Curtis absent) removing the item from the table and continuing it to July 13. CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS. Update of City Council actions. Carls Junior Sign Appeal . Continued at the applicants' request. Council appealed it because of the extra sign and its location on top of the parapet. CASE 3.0272 (Voss Investments) . Council appealed because of the tandem parking. The parking plan will be shown to the Council and shows only a small amount of tandem parking. Perhaps the appeal will be withdrawn. - Replacement for Former Commissioner Neel . Many people have applied. Group interviews are scheduled. New commissioner will probably attend the July 13 meeting. Vice-Chairman Curtis will remain on the Commission until replaced. Townhall Meeting. June 22, 6:30 to 9:30 p.m. , in the Convention Center. Brainstorming session and discussion of downtown issues; changing of Indian Avenue to a State Highway will also be discussed. Traffic Engineer feels that cost of changing Indian to state highway may be more expensive than realized because of different signalization policies; this change has to be explored with Caltrans since their signalization system has hardware which differs from that of Palm Springs. Signals should be changed before Indian becomes the state highway. There will be discussion on diagonal parking on Palm Canyon also. COMMISSION/STAFF REPORTS OR REQUESTS. None. ADDED STARTERS. (Determination of eligibility for consideration.) None. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Chairman adjourned the meeting at 4:05 p.m. AAu6t��cyxxaf_:� PLANN NG RECTOR MDR/ml PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES i Council Chamber, City Hall July 13, 1988 1 :30 p.m. ROLL CALL F-Y 1987 - 1988 Present Present Excused Absences Planning Commission This Meeting to Date to date Larry Lapham, Chairman X 21 3 Hugh Curtis X 23 1 Martha Edgmon - 21 3 Brent Hough - 22 2 Gary Olsen X 21 3 Barbara Whitney X 18 6 Staff Present Marvin D. Roos, Planning Director Siegfried Siefkes, Assistant City Attorney Margo Williams, Planner Douglas Evans, Planner Dean Lewis, Traffic Engineer Richard Patenaude, Planner Mary E. Lawler, Recording Secretary Architectural Advisory Committee - July 11, 1988 William Johnson Absent: Gary Olsen, Alternate Tom Doczi Barbara Whitney, Alternate Will Kleindienst Martha Edgmon, Alternate Mike Buccino Chris Mills, Chairman Chairman called the meeting to order at 1 :30 p.m. M/S/C (Olsen/Curtis; Hough/Edgmon absent) approving minutes of June 22, 1988 as submitted. REPORT OF POSTING AGENDA: The July 13 agenda was available for public access at the City Hall exterior bulletin board and the Planning Division Counter by 1:30 p.m. , Friday, July S.