HomeMy WebLinkAbout1988/04/27 - MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
Council Chamber, City Hall
April 27, 1988
1:30 p.m.
ROLL CALL F-Y 1987 - 1988
Present Present Excused Absences
Planning Commission This Meeting to Date to date
Larry Lapham, Chairman X _ ` 17 2
Hugh Curtis X 19 0
Martha Edgmon X 17 2
Brent Hough X 18 1
Gary Olsen X 16 3
Barbara Whitney - 13 6
Staff Present
Marvin D. Roos, Planning Director
Siegfried Siefkes, Assistant City Attorney
Dave Forcucci , Zoning Enforcement
Margo Williams, Planner
Douglas Evans, Planner
Richard Patenaude, Planner
Mary E. Lawler, Recording Secretary
Architectural Advisory Committee - April 25, 1988
Chris Mills, Chairman Absent: Brent Hough
Will Kleindienst Barbara Whitney, Alternate
Tom Doczi Gary Olsen, Alternate
Martha Edgmon, Alternate
Mike Buccino
William Johnson
Chairman called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m.
M/S/C (Hough/Edgmon; Whitney absent) approving minutes of April 13, 1988 as
submitted.
April 27, 1988 PC MINUTES Page 2
CONSENT ACTION AGENDA
Approval of architectural cases is valid for two years. The approval granted
must be exercised within that time period unless extended.
M/S/C (Edgmon/Hough; Whitney absent) taking the following actions:
SIGN APPLICATION. Application by BEST SIGNS for Desert Hospital for architec-
tural approval of revised sign program for the Desert Hospital Sunrise
Building on southwest corner of Sunrise Way/Vista Chino, "P" Zone,
Section 11.
Approved subject to the following conditions:
1. That the copy style of the word "building" be revised.
2. That the landscaping be enhanced (submit plan) .
3. That the reveal be increased to 2" steps.
CASE 3.0277. Application by SCOTT DORIUS for architectural approval of colors
and materials for a mini-storage facility on Gene Autry Trail between
Mesquite Avenue/Palm Canyon Drive, M-1 Zone (I .L.) , Section 20.
Approved subject to the following conditions: Submit sample of preci-
sion block painted the approved color "cognac" and one alternate color.
CASE 3.0335. Application by JOSE DACOSTA for architectural approval of
revised plans for single-family residence on Girasol Avenue between
Cabrillo Road/N. Racquet Club Road, R-1-C Zone, Section 3.
Approved subject to the following conditions:
1 . That the landscape be restudied.
April 27, 1988 PC MINUTES Page 3
CONSENT ACTION AGENDA (Continued)
CASE 3.0335. (Continued)
2. Eliminate overhang on roof gable at entry way.
3. Submit cap detail of chimney if non-masonry material is used.
4. That all recommendations of the Development Committee be met.
CASE 3.0346. Request by DENNY AUSTIN for reconsideration of action by
Planning Commission for single-family residence on Vista Drive/Via
Livorno, R-1-B Zone, Section 3.
Continued to May 11 at the applicant's request.
CASE 3.0372. Application by NUGENT'S INTERIORS for architectural approval of
revised plans for canvas awnings and sign for a business at 391-393 N.
Indian Avenue, C-B-D Zone, Section 15.
Approved as submitted.
CASE 3.0373 (MINOR) . Application by JOHN WALLING for architectural approval
of second story addition to a single-family residence at 700 W. Stevens
Road, R-1-A Zone, Section 10.
Approved as submitted.
Abstention: Olsen
ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT ACTION AGENDA
Approval of architectural cases is valid for two years. The approval granted
must be exercised within that time period unless extended.
CASE 3.0355. Application by ANGELO TORCHIA for architectural approval of
revised plans for general retail building at 343 S. Palm Canyon Drive,
C-B-D Zone, Section 15.
Planner (Vankeeken) presented the case. Discussion ensued with the
architect, Gabriel King, on the roof design, the roof tile mudding, and
the awning color. Mr. King stated that the design was taken from a
Mediterranean building.
M/S/C (Olsen/Hough; Whitney absent) approving the application subject to
the following conditions:
�,,, 1 . Raise main canopy (minimum 7' headroom) .
April 27, 1988 PC MINUTES Page 4
ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT ACTION AGENDA (Continued)
CASE 3.0355. (Continued)
2. Submit working drawings for AAC and Planning Commission approval .
3. That all recommendations of the Development Committee be met.
CASE 3.0376 (MINOR) . Application by MARRIOTT CORPORATION for architectural
approval of awning program for Bob's Big Boy Restaurant at 1501 N. Palm
Canyon Drive, C-1 Zone, Section 10.
Planner (Williams) presented the case and stated that the remodeling is
similar to. the remodeling of the Bob's Big Boy on E. Palm Canyon; that
the AAC recommended restudy; that the dropped ceiling of the remodeling
has triggered a request for removal of the stained glass insert at the
peak; and that the AAC felt that the building aesthetically is more
pleasing the way it is and did not want to recommend approval of the
changes. She stated that no representative from the Marriott
Corporation was present at the AAC meeting, but is attending the
meeting. In response to Commission questions she stated that the AAC
felt that
changes could be made except for removing the glass, but the Committee
preferred the current design of the building.
Kevin Jennier, Marriott representative, stated that he understood the
recommendations of the AAC, but that because of the dropped ceiling, the
glass should be replaced or covered with stucco; that the stained glass
element does not integrate well with the overall remodeling, nor the
surroundings; that the new colors are similar to the existing ones; that
T-111 finish gives a better finished appearance than painted or coated
glass; that a closure is needed at the peak; and that the dropped
ceiling on the sides is not visible from the street. He stated that the
denial of the awnings is understandable since awnings were also denied
on the E. Palm Canyon building.
Discussion followed. Planning Director stated that the stained glass
window could have a background with a low level lighting which would
have the same effect as the current appearance and would allow it to
remain so that if the dropped ceiling is removed in the future, the
window would still be intact.
Commissioner Edgmon stated that the proposed colors are similar to the
existing ones and no problem.
M/S (Edgmon/Olsen) for approval of the changes subject to AAC recommend-
ations. The motion was withdrawn.
M/S/C (Edgmon/Olsen/; Whitney absent) for a restudy of the application
noting the following:
1 . That no awning should be used.
�� 2. That no stained glass is to be removed.
April 27, 1988 PC MINUTES Page 5
ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT ACTION AGENDA (Continued)
CASE 3.0376 (MINOR) . (Continued)
3. That a revised color sample be submitted with the colored eleva-
tions.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
CASE 5.0400-ZTA. Initiation by the CITY OF PALM SPRINGS for of an amendment
to sections 9203.00 (R-2) , 9204.00 (R-3) , 9205.00 (R-4) , 9212.00 (C-1) ,
9306.00 (Off-Street Parking of the Zoning Ordinance) which will allow
for additional uses within the subject zones and would provide specifi-
cations for angled parking spaces along with other miscellaneous amend-
ments.
(Commission response to written comments on draft Negative Declaration;
no comments received; action.)
Recommendation: That the Commission order the filing of a negative
declaration and approve the zoning text amendments as recommended.
Planning Director stated that the amendments address concerns and omis-
sions of the January 6, 1988 comprehensive zoning ordinance amendment;
that in the amended Zoning Ordinance restaurants will be allowed under a
CUP in small hotels which was prompted by a request by a small hotel on
E. Palm Canyon (Villa Royale) which is now operating for hotel guests
only, and that under a CUP hours and parking can be controlled. He
stated that the C-1 portion of the amendment is because of a previous
omission and that angled parking standards were made definitive in con-
junction with the new smaller parking spaces in the amended comprehen-
sive zoning text; and that more depth has been added for vehicular
backup maneuvering although staff recommends 90 degree parking for
efficiency rather that angled parking.
Chairman declared the hearing open.
Jeremy Crocker, 330 W. Andreas, asked if the requirement for 50% new car
display is part of the amendment.
Planner (Patenaude) stated that it was not.
There being no further appearances; Chairman declared the meeting
closed.
Commissioner Olsen requested the background of parking standards for
resort hotels.
Planning Director stated that the parking standards would not be
affected in terms of numbers but on the basis of impact of the uses. He
stated that a study was done in 1983 on four hotels for a month during
the height of the season to determine peak load which was related back
April 27, 1988 PC MINUTES Page 6
PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued)
CASE 5.0400-ZTA. (Continued)
to rooms and other factors and the parking for large hotels was reduced
30%, and that meeting room parking standards were also reduced. He
stated that the parking is now being addressed on the basis of hotels
and their ancillary facilities.
M/S/C (Curtis/Hough; Whitney absent) ordering the filing of a Negative
Declaration and approving the zoning text amendments as recommended
based on the following finding: That the amendmentsclarify and consoli-
date previous changes in the Zoning Ordinance.
TPM 23055. Application by ASL CONSULTING ENGINEERS for Motel 6 (Randall
Baake) for a tentative parcel map to combine and define parcels to allow
construction of a 150 unit hotel on South Palm Canyon Drive between
Camino Parocela/Sunny Dunes, C-2/R-2/C-M Zones, Section 23.
(Environmental Assessment previously given in conjunction with Case
5 .0437-PD-167.)
Recommendation: That the Commission approve the map subject to condi-
tions.
Vice-Chairman presided.
Planner (Williams) stated as a condition of approval of the planned
development district for Motel 6, a parcel map was required; that the
proposed map will consolidate three lots into one, and that the map con-
forms to all Zoning Ordinance standards.
Chairman declared the hearing open, there being no appearances, the
hearing was closed.
M/S/C (Olsen/Edgmon; Hough/Lapham abstained; Whitney absent) approving
the map based on the following findings and subject to the following
conditions:
Findings
1 . That a parcel map is the appropriate application for lot consolid-
ation.
2. That the site is adequate in size and shape for the proposed
application.
3. That the proposed project is not likely to have an adverse effect
upon the environment.
4. The proposed lot consolidation is not in conflict with the goals
of objectives of the General Plan.
April 27, 1988 PC MINUTES Page 7
PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued)
TPM 23055. (Continued)
`- Conditions
That all recommendations of the Development Committee be met.
PUBLIC COMMENTS - None.
ARCHITECTURAL ADVISORY ITEMS
Approval of architectural cases is valid for two years. The approval granted
must be exercised within that time period unless extended.
CASE 3.0220 (MINOR) . Application by CARL KARCHER ENTERPRISES for architec-
tural approval of an additional sign on the building and roof-mounted
light fixtures for Carl 's Junior at 2520 N. Palm Canyon Drive, PD-136A,
Section 3. (Ref. Case 5.0326-PD-136A.)
Zoning Enforcement Officer presented the case stating that the applicant
is proposing bullet spotlights on the roof and a sign with Carl 's logo
and color, on the north end of the building, for visibility for south-
bound traffic on Palm Canyon Drive, and that the AAC recommended
approval .
Commissioner Curtis questioned the sign's location on the parapet.
Zoning Enforcement Officer stated that there is no other sign in the
complex on a parapet.
Reuel Young, Palm Springs, architect, stated that the sign program for
the Loehmann's Center where Carl 's is located has internally lighted
channel letters on the fascia; that the Carl 's Jr. building is set down
five feet and is below vehicular eye level ; and that the solution is to
place the sign on the parapet.
Commissioner Curtis asked if the monument sign could be moved further up
on Palm Canyon and Mr. Young stated that there is already a monument
sign in that vicinity. Zoning Enforcement Officer explained that there
are three monument signs on the complex.
Commissioner Edgmon stated that she voted in favor of the proposal at
the AAC meeting, but after further thought felt that their should not be
a sign on the parapet and lights on the roof because of there precedence
setting nature. She stated that the idea of allowing the fast-food
facility originally was that the facility be subtle.
Zoning Enforcement Officer stated that the landscaping has grown up at
the center and hides the sign.
April 27, 1988 PC MINUTES Page 8
PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued)
CASE 3.0220 (MINOR) . (Continued)
�... Planning Director stated that the idea of the roof lighting is to give
life to the building at night and if the Commission has questions about
its appropriateness, the item should be continued to May 11 for the
Commission to review the building in the field at night.
Chairman stated that lighting a handsome roof is a good concept.
Mr. Young remarked that lighting of the roof is to show its texture and
that no sign of habitation of the building can be seen from the north
since no light comes from the building.
M/S/C (Curtis/Olsen; Edgmon dissented; Whitney absent) approving the
application subject to the following conditions:
1 . That three inches be left at the top and the bottom of the sign.
2. That the lights be located at the edge of the roof and the fixture
painted to match the color.
3. That there be no exposed conduit.
MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS
CASE 5 .0373-MISC. (Continued) . PLANNING COMMISSION adoption of a resolution
�—° approving the boundaries of a new redevelopment project area (#9) (nine
small areas scattered throughout the City) .
Planning Director stated that the Tribal Council has requested a
continuance to May 11 to discuss the new project area further with the
Redevelopment Agency.
M/S/C (Olsen/Hough; Whitney absent absent) continuing the case to May
11.
_.Tribal Council Comments: See attached Tribal Council comments of 4-26-88.
DISCUSSION (Continued) . Planning Commission discussion on tree trimming
policy, city-wide.
Planning Director requested a continuance for staff to discuss a tree
trimming policy with the landscape architects on the Architectural
Advisory Committee.
M/S/C (Olsen/Edgmon; Whitney absent absent) continuing the item to May
11.
April 27 , 1988 PC MINUTES Page 9
MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS (Continued)
TIME EXTENSION - CASE 5.0360-PD-170. Request by ROBERT T. WARMINGTON COMPANY
for a twelve-month time extension for a planned development district to
allow construction on a 195-unit hotel on East Palm Canyon Drive, R-2/R-
3 Zones, Section 26.
Planner (Williams) stated that the applicant is requesting a third time
extension to May 6, 1989.
Commissioner Curtis asked if it is normal for three time extensions for
financing purposes.
Planner stated that this is not unusual , that the extensions are granted
at the discretion of Commission and Council and that the applicant may
be waiting for a market.
Discussion followed. Commissioner Edgmon requested a review of the
plans since the project is three years old. Chairman stated that it is
a good looking project on E. Palm Canyon and Commissioner Curtis stated
that the, elevations can be reviewed at any time in the future.
M/S/C (Curtis/Olsen; Whitney absent absent) approving a third 12-month
time extension for Case 5.0360-PD-170 subject to all original conditions
of approval . The new expiration date will be May 6, 1989.
CASE 20.103. Request by RIVERSIDE COUNTY for Planning Commission review of
E.I .R. for change of zone from W-2 to CPS and W-2 to IP for property on
the southwest corner of US-10 and Palm Drive (Sphere of Influence) .
Planner (Evans) stated that one of the significant impacts of the
project is on traffic; that the applicant proposes to place four lanes
of traffic on a 42 ft. wide bridge; and that the City's contract Traffic
Engineer will review the applicants traffic study. He stated that other
impacts are impacts on the scenic highway, and the project design, and
that the EIR has good ideas but the project is a "bare bones" subdivi-
sion and fast-food complex on I-10. He stated that the architect
indicates that the design concept will incorporate many of the County' s
standards, but staff has reviewed County standards and finds that there
are few,, and1thatthe project does not take into consideration the Palm
Springs Sphere-of-Influence. He stated that staff recommends a
specific plan be prepared and the EIR reviewed further for impacts
including traffic and circulation and air quality issues; and that addi-
tional mitigation should be developed.
M/S/C (Curtis/Olsen; Whitney absent absent) sending the application back
to the County and adopting staff recommendations as follows:
1 . That a project specific plan be developed prior to consideration
of the Tentative Tract Map; and that the following issues be con-
sidered:
A. Setbacks and landscaping adjacent to all property lines.
Specific emphasis should be placed on I-10 and Gene Autry
Trail . I-10 setbacks and landscaping should be considered
April 27, 1988 PC MINUTES Page 10
MISCELLAMEOUS ITEMS (Continued)
CASE 20.103. (Continued)
�- in the context of utilizing the right-of-way, between I-10
edge of pavement, and property line, for landscape purposes.
B. A master plan for the commercial property should be con-
sidered to eliminate the visual impact of the proposed
typical development plan (Figure 8) presented in the
D.E.I .R. Varied setbacks, alternate building location,
screening of parking areas, and discussed. Discussion in
the D.E.I .R. is conflicting concerning parking areas facing
I-10.
C. Allowable land uses with specific emphasis on air quality
mitigation.
D. Signs with emphasis on reducing the number of freeway signs.
2. That the City Sphere of Influence Plan should be discussed in the
E.I .R.
3. That additional air quality mitigation measures or alternative
developments should be considered to eliminate the significant air
quality impacts.
4. That the Traffic Study included in the D.E.I .R. be reviewed by the
City Traffic Engineer with specific emphasis on intersection capa-
city, design, safety and adequacy of the existing bridge (4 lanes
in 42 feet) .
CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS. Update of City Council actions.
Case 5.0465-CUP (NAIMCO Appeal ) . Council upheld denial of the applica-
tion to add kitchens to a 16-room hotel . Staff found that the project
had originally had only 12 units although it is now operating has a 16
unit complex.
Case 5.0470-CUP (Steve Nichols & Quality Centers) . Council indicated
that the concept is viable. The project will be scheduled for the May
11 Planning Commission.
COMMISSION/STAFF REPORTS OR REQUESTS. None.
April 27, 1988 PC MINUTES Page 11
MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS (Continued)
ADDED STARTERS. (Determination of eligibility for consideration. ) None.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Chairman adjourned the meeting at 2:45
p.m. ..
PLANNING DIRECT-Oft-
MDR/ml
WP/PC MINS
r fi � 7 ;s+ ?ks1 r n vtW=av r„ a as cVs11 wy. au atsc sf €
.k
AGI IA CALIENTE
BAND OF
CAHUILLA INDIANS
April 26, 1988
MEMORANDUM
TO: The Honorable City Council of Palm Springs, and the City
Planning Commission through John A. Mangione, Director
of Community Development
FROM: John Q. Adams, A.C.B.C. I . , Tribal Planning Consultant
SUBJECT: City Planning Commission agenda matters of April 27, 1988 .
ITEM NO. 13. CASE 5. 0373-MISC. . (Continued) . PLANNING COMMISSION
adoption of a resolution approving the boundaries of a
new redevelopment project area (#9) (nine small areas
scattered throughout the City. )
This Case was considered by the Tribal Council .on April 12, 1988.
Your Commission' s action to continue this matter as requested by
the Tribal Council, is appreciated.
The Tribal Planning Consultant has met -with the Redevelopment Agency
Staff and their consultant to review the purpose and objectives of
this Preliminary Plan, including the criteria that was used to
establish the sub-area boundaries. The Agency Staff has indicated
their willingness to recommend favorably on an additional continuance
in order to provide time for further discussions between the Agency
Staff and the Tribal Planning Consultant.
Your favorable consideration regarding this continuance will
be appreciated.
All other uses and matters on the City Planning Commission agenda of
April 27, 1988, were noted since such matters do not materially affect
Indian Trust Lands.
Copy to: Sonny Bono
Sharon Apfelbaum) CSC
. Bill Foster )
Tuck Broich ) To: City Manager' s Office
Earl Neel ) Distribution
�✓ 960 EAST TAHQUITZ WAY • SUITE 106 • PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA 92262 (619) 325-5673
TRIBAL COUNCIL INDIAN PLANNING COMMISSION TRIBAL ATTORNEY
Richard M.Milanovich,Chairman Ted McKinney,Chairman Art Bunce
Sue Short,Vice-Chairman Gloria Gillette,Vice-Chairman
Ray L.Patenclo,Secretary Culver Nichols TRIBAL PLANNING CONSULTANT
Michael Prieto,Member Moraino Patenclo John O.Adams,Vice-President
Lucille G.Torro,Member Peter Siva Psomas&Associates
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
Council Chamber, City Hall
May 11, 1988
1 :30 p.m.
ROLL CALL F-Y 1987 - 1988
Present Present Excused Absences
Planning Commission This Meeting to Date to date
Larry Lapham, Chairman - 17 3
Hugh Curtis X 20 0
Martha Edgmon X 18 2
Brent Hough X 19 1
Gary Olsen X 17 3
Barbara Whitney X 15 5
Staff Present
Marvin D. Roos, Planning Director
Siegfried Siefkes, Assistant City Attorney
Dave Forcucci , Zoning Enforcement
Margo Williams, Planner
Douglas Evans, Planner
Mary E. Lawler, Recording Secretary
Architectural Advisory Committee - May 9, 1988
Chris Mills, Chairman Absent: Gary Olsen, Alternate
Will Kleindienst Mike Buccino
• Tom Doczi
Martha Edgmon, Alternate
William Johnson
Brent Hough
Barbara Whitney, Alternate
Chairman called the meeting to order at 1 :30 p.m.
M/S/C (Olsen/Hough; Lapham absent) approving minutes of April 27, 1988 as
submitted.
ADMINISTRATIVE NOTES:
Chairman Lapham was absent; Vice Chairman Curtis presided.
There were no Tribal Council comments.
•