Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1988/03/09 - MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Council Chamber, City Hall March 9, 1988 1:30 p.m. ROLL CALL F-Y 1987 - 1988 Present Present Excused Absences Planning Commission This Meeting to Date to date Larry Lapham, Chairman X 13 2 Hugh Curtis X 15 0 Martha Edgmon X 13 2 Brent Hough X 14 1 Earl Neel X 14 1 Gary Olsen X 14 1 Barbara Whitney X 13 2 Staff Present Marvin D. Roos, Planning Director Siegfried Siefkes, Assistant City Attorney Douglas Evans, Planner Margo Williams, Planner Mary E. Lawler, Recording Secretary Architectural Advisory Committee - March 7, 1988 Chris Mills, Chairman Absent: Barbara Whitney, Alternate Martha Edgmon, Alternate Gary Olsen, Alternate William Johnson Tom Doczi Will Kleindienst Mike Buccino Brent Hough Chairman called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. M/S/C (Curtis/Hough) approving minutes of February 24, 1988 with the following corrections: Page 20, first paragraph; (Case 5.0421-PD-185) : Change "adventures" to "operations". ADMINISTRATIVE NOTE: There were no Tribal Council comments. March 9, 1988 PC MINUTES Page 2 CONSENT ACTION AGENDA Approval of architectural cases is valid for two years. The approval granted must be exercised within that time period unless extended. M/S/C (Curtis/Neel ) taking the following actions: CASE 3.0191. Application by GREAT AMERICAN MINI STORAGE for architectural approval of gate material for office/warehouse buildings on Farrell Drive/Research Drive, M-1-P Zone, Section 12. Continued to March 23. CASE 3.0289 (MINOR) . Application by KHALIL ALABOUNI for architectural approval of final landscape, exterior lighting and irrigation plans for business at 3395 N. Indian Avenue, C-M Zone, Section 24. Approved subject to the following conditions: 1. That the olives be 36" box minimum one at each end of parking area. 2. That the other parking lot trees be Carobs or Bottle Trees at 24" box size (mini-mum of 4 trees). 3. That the ground cover in front of the building be Natal Plum. 4. All other details to be reviewed by staff. CASE 3.0335. Application by JOE DACOSTA for architectural approval of revised plans for single family hillside residence on Girasol Avenue between Cabrillo Road/N. Racquet Club Road, R-1-C Zone, Section 3. Continued to March 23 pending receipt of revised plans. CASE 3.0342. Application by PERRY LISS for architectural approval of single- family residence on Camino Del Norte between Via Monte Vista/Stevens Road, R-1-C Zone, Section 10. Restudy noting the following: 1. That grades be treated with more sensitivity in relationship to grades of property to the south. 2. That grades be treated with more sensitivity in relationship to grade of Monte Vista. 3. That grading plan and landscape plan be coordinated. 4. That actual sample of mosaic tile be submitted. March 9, 1988 PC MINUTES Page 3 CONSENT ACTION AGENDA (Continued) CASE 3.0343. Application by PERRY LISS for architectural approval of single- family residence on Camino Del Norte between Via Monte Vista/Stevens Road, R-1-C Zone, Section 10. Restudy noting the following: 1. That the AAC members visit site. 2. That grades be treated with greater sensitivity in relationship to grades of property to the south. 3. That the grading plan and landscape plan be coordinated. SIGN APPLICATION. Initiation by CITY OF PALM SPRINGS for architectural approval of freestanding reader board sign for scheduling City events to be located in the Sunrise Plaza in front of the Braille Institute, 0 Zone, Section 13. Continued to March 23. ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL ITEMS Approval of architectural cases is valid for two years. The approval granted must be exercised within that time period unless extended. CASE 3.0353. Application by the CITY OF PALM SPRINGS for architectural approval of Andreas Road streetscape program, Sections 14 & 15. Planning Director recommended that the case be removed from the agenda for submittal of revised plans since a change in concept has been discussed with the Redevelopment Agency and the AAC. M/S/C (Curtis/Hough) removing the application from the agenda pending receipt of revised plans. CASE 5.0344-PD-164. Application by the CITY OF PALM SPRINGS for architectural approval of readerboard for the Convention Center on Avenida Caballeros, C1AA, R4VP, R-4 Zones (IL) , Section 14. Planning Director stated that the Council requested that Planning Commission review a non-electrical attraction board concept for Convention Center; that Council did not want individual movie marquee type of lettering, and that staff devised an original concept to meet these criteria. He stated that the proposed readerboard will be 7 X 8 X 12 ft. with removable 12 inch panels to show coming events, that the panels will be changed monthly with panels moving up and a new event panel inserted at the bottom; and that the panels will be silkscreened each month which would cost less than a programmed readerboard (approximately $5,000 per year) . He explained that the cost will be put out to bid each year; that the sign will be internally lit; and that it would be located perpendicular to March 9, 1988 PC MINUTES Page 4 ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL ITEMS (Continued) CASE 5.0344-PD-164. (Continued) Avenida Caballeros between the entry and Andreas Road and would not dominate the Convention Center complex as it would have if placed by the flag pole. He stated that the AAC felt that instead of a bronze color it should be painted one of the colors of the center; that a stucco like material will be on the base and that the cap material will match the top of the wall on Caballeros. He stated that working drawings would be returned to the Commission for review; and that the wording "schedule of events" will not be used but just the name of event; and that there will be plantings inside the base. Commissioner Neel suggested that plantings not be placed at the base since water seeps through the base blocks and plants grow into the sign. Commissioner Whitney asked if the break between the date and the event were necessary. Planning Director stated that it was not a necessity and perhaps the Convention Center' s symbol could be used instead. M/S/C (Hough/Olsen) continuing the application to March 23. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS CASE 5.0346-CUP. PLANNING COMMISSION review of compliance to CUP conditions for Palm Springs Recycling Company on Oasis Road between Indian Avenue/Del Sol Road, M-1 Zone, Section 34. Planning Director explained that the CUP review after three years was a condition of approval; that the Commission was concerned about the type and scale of the operation and the site' s cleanliness since the nature of the business makes the materials unattractive if not handled properly. He stated that the business is of a scale that if successful would overgrow its boundaries, street improvements had been deferred since there were none in the neighborhood, that operational problems have caused clutter and unsightliness in the neighborhood, and the Commission on January 13 insisted on compliance with the conditions of approval of the CUP. He stated that loading and unloading on the property (not the streets) is a condition of approval , that the operator was required to meet this condi- tion; and that problems including loading and unloading and code violations have been discussed with the applicant for the past six months. He stated that there has been some improvement but some conditions have not been met, and that staff is not ready to recommend that the operators be allowed to continue without monitoring. He stated that the operator is opening a new center outside of the city which will take the bulkier materials and that the operator states that the Palm Springs operation will be returned to its original scale. He noted that the applicant has indicated that some of the conditions of compliance such as storing of materials on trucks on the street were not understood. He recommended that the CUP be extended for six months with staff monitoring and with conditions met. Commissioner Curtis commented that the Commission was firm in its previous conditions to the owner and operator and that conditions were to have been met within 60 days. He asked about complaints. March 9, 1988 PC MINUTES Page 5 MISCELLANEWS ITEMIS (Continued) CASE 5.0346-CUP. (Continued) Planning Director replied that he had contacted some of the property owners nearby and that he had observed once on the weekend that the streets were blocked, but it was at a time when there was street work being done. He stated that parking on the street and trucks storing cardboard should be stopped. Commissioner Hough stated that perhaps six months extension is not long enough if the applicant's second operation is not completed. Planning Director explained that the original operation will be kept at its original location by the applicant and that lack of compliance with condi- tions can be returned to the Commission at any time for review. Commission Olsen suggested that because of the "T" intersection of Del Sol and Oasis, the gate near the intersection should be closed so that the intersection is not impacted. Commissioner Edgmon questioned the storing of materials outside. Planning Director stated that the applicant said that he had not realized that he was not in compliance with fully loaded trucks on the street. Commissioner Edgmon suggested a three month review. Rick Bracamonte, owner and operator of the complex, stated that his invest- ment is substantial; that he would like to continue the operation; and that operations have been curbed and the site cleaned and straightened. He stated that loading and unloading hours have been changed to keep the streets clear but it has been difficult to load and unload on Del Sol because of street work caused by a broken gas line. He supplied photos showing improvement as of March 3 and stated that the congestion will almost be eliminated when his other operation opens outside of the city. He stated that the trucks are not really parked in the street but in a sidewalk area and are there less than 24 hours before being driven away and that there will probably be no problem at the present location when his new operation opens. He stated that no response had been received from staff on a letter he sent requesting information as to compliance. He stated that no adjoining property owners were at the meeting and he had complied with the conditions. He requested a five-year extension since he felt that a six month extension is not long enough. Alan Perrier, 3001 Tahquitz, attorney representing the applicant, requested a continuance of the CUP since there is an expiration date on it and it can be reviewed at any time. He suggested a one year extension since it will be nine months to a year before the new operation begins. He stated that the applicant is making a serious effort to comply with concerns and that the CUP review should be on the agenda in a year. Commissioner Olsen stated that when there is a long standing problem that continues, the short time extension is preferable. Planning Director stated that the CUP expired in January and was extended two months. March 9, 1988 PC MINUTES Page 6 MISCELLANEWS ITEMS (Continued) CASE 5.0346-CUP. (Continued) Chairman commented that the length of time is not important since if a CUP if violated it can be suspended by the Commission, and that a one year extension is acceptable. Richard Nadel , Los Angeles, recycling center land owner, stated that as the land owner he is responsible for the CUP and that it had taken a long time for him to open the business on the site and he had complied with the con- ditions including parking and egress and ingress. He stated that it is an unusual situation but that he is in favor of extending the CUP subject to original conditions because when the applicant leased the property and bought the business he was informed about the conditions of approval . He stated that if the Commission chooses not to issue the permit the matter should be dealt with with him and that he would deal with the tenant because he owns the CUP and the lessee understood that. He stated that giving an extension will not change that fact and that he had gone past the property and saw that materials were being brought outside the building and that egress and ingress is blocked. He stated that he had planned to evict the tenant because of destructiveness to property and other concerns, but that repairs have been made and perhaps correction will be done within the time period. He stated that he has the same type of business in Los Angeles and complies with all regulations and that Los Angeles is much stricter in dealing with violations. In reply to Commission question, he stated that he did not know whether or not if the property were returned to him if he would operate it has a recycling center. Commissioner Curtis asked if a condition has been made by the Commission to unload on the rear of the property, not in the street. Planning Director stated that a condition was made not to block the street and the Del Sol , not the Oasis Street, access was to be used. In reply to Commission question, Assistant City Attorney stated that the lease is between the landlord and the tenant. Chairman commented that the CUP is issued on the property, that it is none of the Commission's business who operates it, and that problems between the tenant and the owner are not the Commission' s concern. Mr. Nadel replied that the CUP was issued to him. Assistant City Attorney stated that the CUP is not issued to a person, but to the property. M/S/C (Neel/Edgmon) extending CUP 5.0346 for one year (to March 8, 1989) subject to all original conditions of approval and conditions of approval acted upon by the Planning Commission on January 13, 1988 as follows: 1. That staff monitor the original conditions of approval frequently. 2. That loading and unloading be resolved on-site. March 9, 1988 PC MINUTES Page 7 PUBLIC BEARINGS CASE 5.0400-ZTA. PLANNING COMMISSION review of the M-1 provisions on City corridors for inclusion in the Zoning Ordinance. (An Environmental Assessment/Initial Study has previously been considered and a Negative Declaration filed on the original Zoning Text Amendment.) Recommendation: That the Zoning Text Amendment be removed from the agenda for preparation of a revised draft. Planning Director stated that staff has been unable to meet with the Tribal Council consultant. Chairman declared the hearing open; there being no appearances, the hearing was closed. M/S/C (Curtis/Olsen) removing the Zoning Text Amendment from the agenda for a revised draft to be prepared and for staff to meet with the Tribal Council consultant. CASE 5.0463-PD-195. Application by the DESERT SUN for a Planned Development District to allow construction of a newspaper publishing facility, including a portion of the facility with a 50 f t. building height, on Gene Autry Trail between Tachevah Drive/Ramon Road, M-1-P Zone, Section 7. (Commission response to draft Negative Declaration; action.) Recommendation: That the Commission order the filing of a Negative Declaration and approve the preliminary Planned Development District subject to conditions. Planning Director stated that the item has been continued twice for design changes and that no neighboring property owners have protested the application. He stated that there is a 50 ft. height on a portion of the building which is a concern but flood control requirements require the height, that the project does not meet setbacks on the east side which faces 0-5 Zoning and that staff is in the process of reviewing a significant change in the General Plan for the area. He recommended that the Planned Development District be sent on to Council subject to conditions, and that one comment has been received (before the meeting) from flood control for no walls around projects until Flood Control issues have been resolved. He stated that perhaps wrought iron fences could be built so that water flow is not impeded, and that these details will be resolved at the final development plan stage. He presented conditions of approval including those from the General Operations Department and described the revised elevations on the board. He stated that the architect simplified the form of the building and the majority of the AAC found it acceptable but felt that refinement is needed in some areas of the building design and site plan. He stated that staff can work with the architects to achieve acceptable changes, that the rear of the building is precast paneling; and that the complex is half the size of the Convention Center in Phase I with Phase II doubling the size of the first phase. Chairman declared the hearing open. March 9, 1988 PC MINUTES Page 8 PUBILIC COMENTS (Continued) CASE 5.0463-PD-195. (Continued) David Christian, 1000 S. Palm Canyon, project architect, described the building materials as plaster, tile, and precast concrete and showed the color bands on the elevations. He stated that the firm is proud of the building and feels that it is both conservative and distinctive and will stand the test of time. He stated that the driveway area in the front will be changed to reflect AAC concerns; that color bands were designed to address AAC concerns although one member felt that the design should be simplified; that the grid element may be changed, and that a simpler color scheme may be developed. Oza Bouchard, 1000 S. Palm Canyon, project architect, stated that he was encouraged by the AAC response to the revised design, that the color patterns will be cohesive in the final design; that the production wing is precast concrete with the and aluminium for sparkle; and that the site plan will be less rigid in final development plans. There being no further appearances, Chairman declared the hearing closed. Chairman complimented the architects, stating that the building is handsome. He suggested organizing the colors and using Dri-vit for a richer, more permanent appearance to the plaster. Commissioner Whitney stated that she felt the design had been improved greatly, but the quality of the design is still compromised and could be compromised further if problems develop during construction. She recom- mended that the design be refined further and sent back to the AAC and asked for direction on Commission action. Planning Director stated that the application could be a total restudy or partially approved with architectural plans subject to restudy. He stated also that the Commission could state that the architectural conditions of the AAC be met prior to approval of the final development plans. He stated that the Planned Development District should not be held in abeyance, but the Council should be told Commission feelings on the project including the architectural concerns. He also stated that the colors have changed some- what from the original submittal and will be a final development plan issue. Chairman commented that the applicant should receive Commission approval of the preliminary Planned Development District. M/S/C (Curtis/Neel ) ordering the filing of a Negative Declaration and giving approval to the preliminary Planned Development District based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: Findings• 1. That the newspaper publishing use is allowable by right of zone and the application is properly one for which a Planned Development District is authorized by the Zoning Ordinance. 2. That the proposed use is necessary and desirable for the development of the community, is in harmony with the elements and objectives of March 9, 1988 PC MINUTES Page 9 PUBILIC COMMENTS (Continued) CASE 5.0463-PD-195. (Continued) the General Plan, and is not detrimental to existing uses or to future uses specifically permitted in the vicinity of the proposed use. 3. That the 8.5 acre site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed use in order to adjust said use to permitted future uses of land in the neighborhood. 4. That the proposed use is located on a major thoroughfare which is properly designed and will be improved to carry the type and quantity of traffic to be generated by the proposed development. 5. That conditions of approval are deemed necessary to protect the public health safety and general welfare. 6. That an initial study has been prepared and no significant environ- mental impacts have been identified. 7. That the reduced high-rise setbacks to the north property line and to the east property line for Phase II are desirable and that adequate area is available to provide landscape buffers to adjacent pro- perties. 8. That a parking management program is requested and that adequate pro- visions have been required to eliminate parking problems if they arise in the future. 9. That a public hearing has been noticed and held in accordance with State and local laws. Conditions: 1. That the main identification sign proposed on the building and a double faced monument sign located adjacent to the north driveway are conceptually approved. 2. That final development plans be submitted in accordance with Section 9403.00 of the Zoning Ordinance. Final plan shall include building elevations, floor plans, roof plans, site plan, grading plan, landscape plans, irrigation plans, exterior lighting plans, and sign program. 3. That the proposed parking management program (200 spaces) is approved subject to periodic review by the City and in the event additional parking is necessary up to a total of 220 parking spaces may be required. Upon written notification by the Planning Director the property owner shall install additional parking in accordance to Section 9306.00 of the Zoning Ordinance. 4. Prior to submission of final landscape plans to the Planning Division, the applicant shall obtain written approval from the River- side County Agricultural Commissioner with regards to the appropriate March 9, 1988 PC MINUTES Page 10 PUBLIC COMMENTS (Centi roved) CASE 5.0463-PD-195. (Continued) inspection for pest control and any other purposes consistent with the Agriculture Code. Plans shall include the owner's, applicant's, landscape architect' s, and contractor' s (if available) name, address, and phone number. The place of origin of all plant materials should be known in order to reduce delays. Three copies of the plans shall be stamped indicating the Agricultural Commissioners approval along with the written approval form. The owner of the project shall be responsible for assuring compliance with all approvals, City and Agricultural Commissioner, during the installation of landscape materials. Contact the Indio Office of the Agricultural Commissioner, 46209 Oasis Street, Indio, CA (619-342-8291) . 5. That the final landscape plan shall include a shading plan which illustrates compliance with the 50% shadeing requirement. Refer to Section 9306.00 of the Zoning Ordinance for details. 6. That five handicapped parking spaces are required. 7. That prior to issuance of grading permit payment shall be made to the Nature Conservance in the amount of $600.00 per acre to assist in the implementation of the Fringe-toed Lizard Habitat Conservation Plan. 8. That the proposed 33 foot half street across the north property line be offered For dedication to the City as a public street. �-' 9. That all recommendations of the Development Committee be met. 10. That final development plans be submitted. 11. That the building color, grid system, window frame, building material (Dri-vet is recommended) , and site plan be further refined per AAC discussions. PUBLIC COMMENTS - None. Commissioner Whitney left briefly. March 9, 1988 PC MINUTES Page 11 ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL ITEPIS (Continued) Approval of architectural cases is valid for two years. The approval granted must be exercised within that time period unless extended. CASE 3.0364 (MINOR). Application by WESTAR for architectural approval for repaint new colors at Racquet Club Center, 2400 N. Palm Canyon, P.D. 113, Section 3. Planning Director stated that the applicant requested a continuance. M/S/C (Hough/Edgmon; Whitney absent) continuing the application to March 23. Commissioner Whitney returned. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS (Continued) CASE 10.364. Request by staff for determination to add truck rodeos to allowable uses at Equestrian Center, 0 Zone, Section 19. Planning Director stated a request for a truck rodeo at the Equestrian Center was received from a promoter. He presented a video of the proposed rodeo and stated that the days would be Friday and Saturday evening, April 1 and 2 (during Easter Week) , from 7 to 8:30 p.m. He stated that the show is an exhibition of large trucks crushing cars and will be a one time event although the promoter has indicated interest in a yearly event. He stated that the equestrian center is approved for equestrian uses only and if the proposal is approved by the Commission, perhaps the abandoned cars in the city could be used for crushing, if it is legal and feasible. He stated that the Commission has the ability to approve uses in a city facility, should decide whether or not the use is appropriate, and that the equestrian center is under a Conditional Use Permit and perhaps the proposal should be heard in a public hearing. He stated that the Council was concerned about disruption of police efforts during Easter Week and the promoter indicates he will contract private security, and that the facility is designed for the type of use and the security involved. Chairman stated that the proposal could be tried for two days. Commissioner Curtis stated that neighbors may complain, but that the use is acceptable. Richard Finan, Equestrian V, stated that noise, pollution, and upsetting of the neighbors is a concern, but the proposal could be tried once and that when the equestrian center is in full operation there will be no ability to have a truck rodeo. He stated that traffic control will be a problem. Seth Doulton, the promoter, stated that the police department indicated that if he cannot obtain enough security forces, the police will give him names of security firms; that he wants the operation to be safe so that he can return; and that he would not do outside advertising since he will try to draw people that are already in the area to the rodeo. March 9, 1988 PC MINUTES Page 12 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS (Continued) CASE 10.364. (Continued) M/S/C (Hough/Curtis; Neel/Olsen abstained; Whitney dissented) determining that a truck rodeo/exhibition as a one time event at the equestrian center is an allowable use. (The event is to be held April 1 and 2 from 7 to 8:30 P.M.) Commissioner Curtis suggested that people in the surrounding areas be notified. Planning Director stated that the Director of Parks, Recreation and Library also has to approve the use since it is other than an equestrian event and that the Council and property owners will be notified. CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS. Update of City Council actions. CASE 5.0460-PD-194 (Merickel Development). The project was returned to Planning Commission by the Council . Seventy adjoining property owners objected to the proposal . Council is concerned about density, design, compatibility to the surrounding area, and lack of amenities. Staff will work with the applicant to improve the design. All arguments noted by the Commission in its approval were presented. CASE 5.0461-GPA (General Plan Amendment). Council raised concerns about reduction of rights-of-way on certain streets. Case was continued for a joint study session with the Commission (to be coordinated by staff and Commission appraised of time and date.) Also proposed Crossley Road name change protested by the Black Historical Society. COMMISSION/STAFF REPORTS OR REQUESTS. Planning Commission Study Session. Regular study session to be held on March 16, 3 to 5 p.m. , Large Conference Room, City Hall . Bus Shelters. Staff proposal of years ago to have benches and trees does not interest Sunline because of cost. The agency is now proposing a three sided shelter/kiosk with advertising on the sides. Designer of the structure has been told that a better design is necessary. Advertising is opposed by staff, but Council did not say that advertising could not be done. The proposal is being promoted by a large Southern California company who will maintain the structures. The City would receive some revenue if advertising is approved. Planning Director suggested that the Commission should state opposition to advertising to Council if it is opposed. Placement of benches and trees at the beginning of construction of projects was suggested by Commissioner Neel . ADDED STARTERS. (Determination of eligibility for consideration.) None. March 9, 1988 PC MINUTES Page 13 ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Chairman adjourned the meeting at 3:10 p.m. r FLANN.M% DIRECTOR MDR/ml PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Council Chamber, City Hall MARCH 23, 1988 • 1:30 p.m. ROLL CALL F-Y 1987 - 1988 Present Present Excused Absences Planning Commission This Meeting to Date to date Larry Lapham, Chairman X 14 2 Hugh Curtis X 16 0 Martha Edgmon X 14 2 Brent Hough X 15 1 Earl Neel X 15 1 Gary Olsen X 15 1 Barbara Whitney X 13 3 Staff Present Marvin D. Roos, Planning Director Siegfried Siefkes, Assistant City Attorney Douglas Evans, Planner Margo Williams, Planner Carol Vankeeken, Planner Richard Patenaude, Planner Dave Forcucci , Zoning Enforcement Ken Feenstra, Redevelopment Director John Terell , Redevelopment Planner Mary E. Lawler, Recording Secretary Architectural Advisory Committee - March 21, 1988 Chris Mills, Chairman Absent: Barbara Whitney, Alternate Martha Edgmon, Alternate Gary Olsen, Alternate William Johnson Tom Doczi Will Kleindienst Mike Buccino Brent Hough Chairman called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. Minutes of March 9, 1988 will be approved at the adjourned meeting of March 29.