Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1987/12/09 - MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Council Chamber, City Hall December 9, 1987 1:30 p.m. ROLL CALL F-Y 1987 - 1988 Present Present Excused Absences Planninq CgYnmissjon ' ``'' This Meeting to Date to date Larry Lap am, Chairman - 9 1 Hugh Curtis X 10 0 Martha Edgmon X 8 2 Brent Hough X 9 1 Earl Neel X 9 1 Gary Olsen X 9 1 Barbara Whitney X 8 2 Staff Present Marvin D. Roos, Planning Director Siegfried Siefkes, Assistant City Attorney Douglas Evans, Planner Richard Patenaude, Planner Margo Williams, Planner Carol Vankeeken, Planner John Terell, Redevelopment Planner Dave Forcucci , Zoning Enforcement Jerry Gonzalez, Traffic Engineer Mary E. Lawler, Recording Secretary Architectural Advisory Committee - December 7, 1987 Chris Mills, Chairman Absent: Mike Buccino Tom Doczi Barbara Whitney Martha Edgmon, Alternate Gary Olsen Brent Hough William Johnson Will Kleindienst Chairman called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. M/S/C (Edgmon/Neel ) approving minutes of November 25, 1987 as submitted. December 9, 1987 PC MINUTES Puy CONSENT ACTION AGENDA Approval of architectural cases is valid for two years. The approval granted must be exercised within that time period unless extended. M/S/C (Curtis/Olsen) taking the following actions: CASE 3.0318 (MINOR) (Continued) . Application by EXPRESS GAS for architectural approval of revised building colors and revised sign for service station at 2901 N. Palm Canyon Drive, U-R Zone, Section 3. Removed from agenda pending action by the City Attorney. CASE 5.0424-CUP (Continued) . Application by the MARRIOTT CORPORATION for archi- tectural approval of revised detailed landscape, irrigation and exterior lighting plans and a main identification sign for 149 unit hotel on the east side of Hermosa Drive/Tahquitz Way/Andreas Drive, R-4-VP/C-1-AA Zones (I.L. ) , Section 14. Neel abstained. Approved subject to the following conditions: I. That the header board be replaced with a concrete mow strip. 2. That the annual planter along Tahquitz Way be increased from four (4) feet to six (6) feet and follow the contours of the berm. CASE 3.785. Application by RICHARD EHRLICH for architectural approval of revised plans for entry gates for 134 unit apartment project located between E. Palm Canyon Drive/Avery Road/Compadre Road/R-3 Zone, Section 24. Approved subject to the following conditions: 1. That the extension of the horizontal radiused rods into the vertical section be a continuous size. 2. That the vertical pickets shall be smaller in size and shall extend up to meet bottom horizontal tube. (Eliminate horizontal support rod. ) 3. That all pickets be square tubes. 4. That the pilaster shape match radius element on carport. 5. That both sides of masonry wall be even in height step to accommodate grade difference to occur beyond corner. 6. That details to be reviewed by staff. December 9, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 3 CONSENT ACTION AGENDA (Continued) CASE 3.0123. Application by HERITAGE RANCH CORPORATION for architectural approval of detailed final landscape, irrigation, and exterior lighting plans for retail shopping center on N. Palm Canyon on Via Escuelas/7_anjero Street, C-1 Zone, Section 3. Removed from the agenda for staff review. CASE 3.022.7. Application by KAPTUR & CIOFFI for architectural approval of land- scape plans and patio furniture for PJ' s restaurant in the Vineyard shopping complex. S. Palm Canyon Drive. , C-B-D Zone, Section 15. Approved subject to the following condition: That details of the heaters be submitted to staff for review. CASE 3.0257 (Ref. Case 7.672) . Application by MIKE SEM for architectural approval of revised plans for single-family residence on Dunham Road/Andreas Hills Drive, R-1-C Zone, Section 1. Approved subject to the following conditions: 1. That the parapet return at the southeast and southwest corners of the roof and that the roof be flattened. 2. That final landscape, irrigation and lighting be submitted. 3. That the patio colonnade be restudied. 4. That all recommendations of the Development Committee be met. CASE 3.0310. Application by DON WILLIAMS, JR. for architectural approval of single family hillside residence on Bisnaga Avenue between Rim Road/end of Bisnaga Avenue, R-1-13 Zone, Section 25. Approved subject to the following conditions: 1. That retaining walls on north and west property lines be restudied to perhaps achieve a more organic solution. 2. That the southwest corner of the house be restudied to visually break solid the line of the south elevation (e.g. a wing wall ) . 3. That the color scheme be restudied to blend in more with the natural landscape. 4. That final detailed landscape, exterior lighting, and irrigation plans be submitted. 5. That all recommendations of the Development Committee be meta December 9, 1987 PC MINUTES Paq< CONSENT ACTION AGENDA (Continued) CASE 3.0319. Application by PAUL RICKS for architectural approval of 'single,- family hillside residence on Crestview Drive between Ridge Road/OverIook Road, R-1-C Zone, Section 27. Approved subject to the following conditions: 1. That final detailed landscape, exterior lighting, and irrigation n, submitted for review. 2. That all recommendations of the Development Committee be met. CASE 3.0320 (MINOR) . Application by DOROTHY REED for architectural approval of a detached garage covered parking area at 2277 Bisnaga Avenue, R-1-B Zone, Section 25. Removed from the agenda for staff approval . :,i\Si- 3.032.6. Application by DESERT CHAPEL for architectural approval of school classroom additions for church at 650 S. Sunrise Way, PD-59, Section 24. Continued to January 13, 1988. CAST-- 3.0314 (MINOR) . Application by TEES ARE US for architectural approval ;f revised plans for sliding door to front of building at 234 N. Palm Canyon Drive, CBD Zone, Section 1.5. Approved as submitted. * * * k k CASE 7.675-AMM. Application by TOM DOCI_I for architectural approval of revised final detailed landscape, irrigation, and exterior lighting plans for a single family residence at 690 Stevens Road, R-1-A Zone, Section 11 . Continued to January 13, 1988. * * * k CA")C :3.0116. Application by CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATES for architectural approval al extarior lighting fixtures for a 94 unit hotel (Hampton Inn) on N. P-flm Canyon Drive, south of Via Escuela, C-1/R-3 Zones, Section 3. Approved subject to the following condition: That fixture #683 be used. (Color to match stucco. ) k December 9, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 5 ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT ACTION AGENDA Approval of architectural cases is valid for two years. The approval granted must be exercised within that time period unless extended. CASE 3.702 (Continued) . Application by KAPTUR & CIOFFI for Peri-Mel I for architectural approval of screening of florescent light fixtures for a 118 unit condominium project on Avenida Caballeros between Arenas Road/Saturmino Road, R-4 Zone (I.L. ) , Section 14. Chairman abstained; Vice-Chairman presided. Planner (Williams) reported that the AAC reviewed the light fixtures in the field; that the fixtures were attached to the ceiling without shields; but that the lights needed diffusion and that the applicant put transluscent white plastic lens over the tubes. She stated that the AAC voted 3-1 to approve the lens, and those voting approval felt that the shields should be longer to screen the tube completely from view. M/S/C (Hough/Neel ; Edgmon/Olsen/Lapham abstained) approving the light fixtures subject to the following condition: That the lens is to be longer to shield the ends of the fixtures. CASE 3.870 (Continued) . Application by ALEXANDER COLER for architectural approval of detailed landscape, exterior lighting, and irrigation plans for a single-family residence on the south side of an easement between the Tachevah Dam Spillway/Crescent Drive, R-1-C Zone, Section 10. M/S/C (Curtis/Neel ) tabling the case. CASE 3.0277. Application by J. SCOTT DORIUS for architectural approval of revised plans for a mini-storage managers unit facility on Gene Autry Trail/Palm Canyon Drive, M-1 Zone (I.L. ) , Section 20. Planner (Vankeeken) stated that the applicant has revised the manager' s unit and that the AAC voted for approval 6-0. CommissionerHough explained that he had been one of the members of the AAC who liked the original plan better but with increased landscaping, addi- tion of plate glass, and lighting that casts, shadows on the wall . He felt that the new plan is acceptable. Commissioner Edgmon agreed. M/S/C (Curtis/Neel ) approving the revised plans subject to the following conditions: 1. That the vertical member on balconies be deleted. 2. That balconies and entry gates be of like material . 3. That fluted block be used on returns of storage wall facing Gene Autry Trail . December 9, 1987 PC MINUTES page ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT ACTION AGENDA (Continued) CASE 3.047. (Continued) 4. That window treatment on the east elevations be similar to window treatment on the. West elevation. 5. That final landscape plans incorporate amended landscape treatment for area of manager' s unit. 6. That all recommendations of the Development Committee be met. CASE 3.0330 (MINOR) . Application by DOUG RICHIE for architectural approval of hotel repaint at 555 Warm Sands, R-2 Zone, Section 23. Zoning Enforcement Officer explained that the AAC after reviewing the hotel on a field trip voted 3-2 in favor of repaint, feeling that the blue color is not satisfactory. Camiissioner Curtis stated that one of the major problems is that thre tile roof with its chipped white paint looks worse than the blue Wilding. Discussion continued on the trim colors. 0ning Enforcement Officer stated that the AAC had no ,abjection 0 the trim colors but there were some members of the r ,(imi `_'. who f,�l ' Gn I1up should be grayed in tone. `)ours Ritchie, 555 Warm Sands, the applicant, stated that he h,i,! 1 real i tart that architectural approval was requ i r-d for repa i n ti nq Lh , !M11151; ':i' & the colors were galp ,ted with U _ if tsar' 10)ii dealers; that the neighbors like the colors and feel the lmprov,,�;ic-lts Vlrle� l to the neighborhood, and that the roof is a prot,'em but i� A, kq aIln=d to weather. Planner (William,.;) (:explained that three of the five AAC meNvers voted a:iikst the color and one .+:4mbcer stated that the color *is not offegsivre `);i t. ,)u l d be iaor Ira/0 i„ tone. i,f!mmissionor Ed- i+ n 'suggested repai`li ing the triT, Coon issionor Cur his suggested that the applicant contict an architect for color nele:tion that would be more appropriate for a tr i� coat color with Be Qnr to he reviewed by the Commission. M/S/ : (Curtis/hough) approving painting the trim of the hotel white or off-white (with colors to be approved by staff) . December 9, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 7 ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT ACTION AGENDA (Continued) SIGN APPLICATION. Application by ARMAND TOUGAS for architectural approval of two main identification signs for the Tropics Hotel , 411 E. Palm Canyon Drive, R-3 Zone, Section 26. Zoning Enforcement Officer expemoved whenained the aphelcati newosigns on tare he bapprdoved aand that the pole signs will be that the new sign on the east side is smaller than the existing one. M/S/C (Curtis/Edgmon) approving the sign application subject to the following condition: That the monument be modified and the relief wrapped around and upward toward the cabinet top. CASE 3.031�bb(MI ndR)confp pence troom b orACanyonE HotelER2800 S rcPalmcSpringspResort o y Drive, R-2 Zone, Section 35. Planning Director stated that the apartment units are now under the control of the original builder and will be operated as a hotel , and that a lobby and conference room building are to be added to the site. He stated that the AAC restudied the application feeling that the new struc- ture should relate to the existing building and that the applicant is requesting approval so that he can start advertising conference room facilities. Alexander Coler, the applicant, stated that the project was leased to the bankrupt hotel ; that he has repossessed it; that the original recreation building was converted to a restaurant, that a conference room is needed to make the project economically viable; that the plans although not sophisticated were discussed with staff for direction, that he thought the application was being processed as a minor one; that he can finish the building in time for the season if the approval is given soon; that the building is sited on the only possible location; that the open space is adequate; that the architecture is similar to the old structure except for balconies. He requested approval instead of the AAC recommended restudy. Chairman suggested staff review, Planning Director stated that staff would work with the developer for a better sense of entry and to address other Commission concerns. M/S/C (Curtis/Neel ) approving the application subject to the following conditions: That staff review the application for a proper color match and to make the new building compatible with the existing structure and to reach an acceptable porte-cochere design and subject to all recom- mendations of the development committee. CASE 3.870 (Continued) . Application by ALEXANDER COLER for architectural approval of detailed landscape, exterior lighting, and irrigation plans for single-family residence at Patencio Road/Crescent Road, R-1-A Zone, Section 10. M/S/C (Curtis/Olsen) removing the application from the table. December 9, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 8 ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT ACTION AGENDA (Continued) CASE 3.870 (Continued) . (Continued) Planning Director explained the house has two landscaped areas - one around the house and tennis court, and the other the remainder of the property. He stated that the landscape is already planted without plans submitted until it was done, and that many of the plantings are natural vegetation with rocks. He stated that the AAC questioned the line of Eucalyptus trees on the north property line, feeling that a high hedge would be created and that the area contains three golf greens and four tees. He explained that the Eucalyptus trees grown so close together would not properly develop that the hedge would be used as a screen to stop golf balls from hitting neighboring property, and that the AAC did not feel that a 35 ft. high hedge would be acceptable, and recommended sight studies. He explained that there is a question concerning the golf course and that staff has never dealt with a golf course as part of a single-family residential property, that it is adjacent to existing residences, that complaints have been received about the golf course use in this residential area; that normally a golf course requires a conditional use permit, and that no complaints have been received about the tennis court. Commissioner Curtis suggested that the holes be revised so that balls are not hit toward the residences. Planning Director stated that rearrangement of the golf course would require redesign of the site plan. Mr. Coler stated that the longest hole is 225 yards. Chairman noted that the home owners in the area bought homes on the reasonable assurance that nobody would be hitting golf balls into their yards and are understandably upset. Planning Director stated that the Eucalyptus trees could be maintained at predetermined height for no view obstruction and a condition for this could be monitored, but would probably be lost in files ,years from now. He stated that a covenant could be recorded, but would also have to be monitored. Chairman asked whether or not the city could be sued if no CUP were required since the Commission knows that the area is a golf course. Assistant City Attorney stated that it is difficult to determine the action of a plaintiff, but in his opinion the City could not be sued since a CUP would not be required for a backyard in which there are areas for golf, although the Planning Director and he disagree regarding whether or not the area is a golf course. Commissioner Curtis asked if the application were architectural approval one. Planning Director stated that whether the area is landscaping or a golf course should be determined by the Commission and on record. Commissioner Neel stated that the greens should be redesigned to eliminate golf balls being hit into the yards because it is not fair to the people in the neighborhood. Decemher 9, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 9 ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT ACTION AGENDA (Continued) CASE 3.870 (Continued) . (Continued) Mr. Coler, the applicant, stated that only he and a guest would be playing on the course, that there have been tees installed on other properties without approval , that the case planner did not comment to the contrary and required only submittal of the landscape plan for a golf course and that he carries proper liability insurance. He stated that the Eucalyptus trees should not obstruct the view because the trees are lacy and are 10 feet (not 6 feet) on center and staggered, that he would sign a covenant for keeping trees at a certain height and felt that he had done nothing out of the ordinary. Commissioner Hough stated that he feels the area is a recreation area in a yard and that he was concerned about mountain Eucalyptus thedge houses since before will the hide the mountain view although ' Eucalyptus trees do. Commissioner Neel agreed that the trees could block the mountain view, stated keeping them topped is expensive, and that grouping the trees would be a better solution. Planning Director stated that one complaint about the golf course had been received six weeks ago, but not since, and that there ' were some complaints from home owners behind the course at a Commission meeting, but also some were in favor of the application. Commissioner Curtis requested that the applicant take the concerns of the Commission regarding grouping of the trees, obstruction of the view, and height of the tree hedge to an architect for a redesigned plan to be brought back to the Commission. Mr. Coler stated that if the trees obstruct the view he will tear them out since they are set back at a great distance leaving at least 3/4 of the mountain visible and entire skyline open to view. He stated that the hedge should be allowed. Commissioner Olsen suggested a field review of the area. Planning Director explained to Commission that the landscape plans were submitted after the trees were planted, and that the installation was done before approval was obtained. M/S/C (Curtis/Olsen) continuing the application to January 13 with a field trip scheduled prior to January 13 with the Commission to be informed of the date and time. December 9, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 10 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS DETERMINATION. PLANNING COMMISSION approval of land use permit for a collector car auction February 27 and 28, 1988, at the Marquis Hotel . Planning Director stated that a recent change to the Municipal Code regarding auctions allows special event auctions in any facility designed to hold large scale public meetings as long as it is an appropriate use and that staff recommends approval . M/S/C (Curtis/Neel ) approving a land use permit permitting a collector car auction in February at the Marquis Hotel . PUBLIC HEARINGS CASE 5.0400-ZTA (Continued) . PLANNING COMMISSION review of M-1 provisions on scenic corridors for inclusion in the Zoning Ordinance. (An Environmental Assessment/Initial Study has been previously considered and a Negative Declaration filed on the original zoning text amendment. ) Recommendation: That the Commission continue the item to January 13, 1988. Planner stated that the Tribal Council requests additional review time and that staff met with Commissioner Hough to review ordinance changes. He stated that in Part I of the ordinance, the clause to allow any uses allowed in the C-1, C-Z & C-M Zone was removed, and that several uses from the C-1 to the M-1-P Zones were developed as a list for the M-1 Zone. He stated that certain uses were not listed such as apartments, hotels and retail types of uses and some uses left (such as art galleries) that can occur in industrial parks. He stated that catalog showrooms and hi-tech manufacturing uses were added by right of zone, that the Part II uses on lots not located with 200 ft. of a scenic corridor had a few changes, and that the conditional use list is the same as before except for the additional of chemical supply uses and cocktail lounges. He stated that the Tribal Council consultant is concerned about adding CUP requirements to the zone, questioned if there were any gain, suggested that scenic corridors by street names be added to the list on M-1 properties for easy reference, and that if the item is continued it would not be reviewed with the other amendments at the next Council meeting. He stated that No. 32 (manufacturing uses) is not automotive, but is hi-tech electronic uses. Chairman declared the hearing open. Scott Dorius, 1111 Tahquitz Way, stated that he was concerned about the effect of a CUP requirement on his mini-warehouse project on Gene Autry Trail , since he has spent two years in assembling and processing plans, and if he had known about the revisions to the ordinance, the project would have taken a different direction. He stated that he had practiced land use law and the project can be constructed although a CUP requirement could stop it until a hearing is held, and that he feels challenged by the Zoning Ordinance direction. There being no further appearances, Chairman closed the hearing. December 9, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 11 PUBLIC HEARINGS CASE 5.0400-Z_TA. (Continued) Chairman explained that no one is being singled out, but that the Commission wants a different direction for lots in the area. Planning Director stated that the project has been discussed at length with the applicant and that if the Commission wants the project to proceed, a clause could be inserted to applications projects such as this which are in the development process. He stated that if a CUP were required for the project, the developer would have only three months to begin construction and that the applicant would like a vote on whether or not the Commission would be amenable to grandfathering the project. He stated that the next meeting will be on January 13, giving the Commission a month to decide whether or not the use should be considered in the M-1 Ordinance. Commissioner Hough suggested that staff prepare a list of affected projects for the January 13 meeting. Chairman reiterated that the Commission concern is for uses on scenic corridors in general . M/S/C (Curtis/Edgmon) continuing the application to January 13. TRIBAL COUNCIL COMMENTS The Tribal Council understands that consideration is being given to revisions the M-1 Section of the Zoning Ordinance with respect to permitted uses along the scenic corridors. In view of the potential impact on Indian trust lands and the lack of specific information with respect to the proposed revisions, the Tribal Council requested that this Case be continued to the Planning Commission' s next regularly scheduled meeting. TPM 22406 (Continued) . Application by HACKER ENGINEERING COMPANY for John Rocca for Tentative Parcel Map to subdivide property into 13 lots for residential purposes at Morongo Trail/Araby Drive, R-1-B Zone, Section 25. (Commission response to written comments on Draft Negative Declaration; no comments received; action. ) Planning Director stated that the applicant requested removing the map from the agenda because the City did not want to maintain private streets on the project and the applicant will redesign the map for public streets, and that the map will be renoticed when it is on an agenda in the future. Chairman declared the hearing open; there being no one in the audience the hearing was closed. M/S/C (Curtis/Olsen) removing TPM 22406 from the agenda for redesign. December 9, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 12 PUBLIC HEARINGS CASE 5.0461-GTA. Initiation by the CITY OF PALM SPRINGS for amendments to the General Plan Circulation Element, city-wide. (Commission response to written comments on Draft Negative Declaration; no comments received; action. ) Recommendation: That the Commission continue the item to January 27, 1988. Planner Evans stated that the report is based on the JHK Traffic Study and SCAG/CBVG Study involving regional transportation needs and that Commission input was provided' after a Commission meeting in June. He stated that the traffic service level goal is Level "C", which is a moderate level of service, that Los Angeles has "D" level service and the City will be in the "D" service level by the year 2010. He stated that the level of the service tables are at full build-out and that service level "E" will be service level on most larger thoroughfares during peak months and/or at isolated locations such as the eastern side of the City near Cathedral City. He stated that upgrades include addition of lanes; that one-way streets will be Indian and North Palm Canyon from Alejo to Via Escuela; that some streets will be downgraded to smaller roadways; that the Commission should consider several alternatives for Alejo, especially whether or not it should extend under the airport. He stated that there will be some new General Plan streets, some deleted General Plan streets, that some streets will be renamed, and that noise impacts will occur even if the General Plan amendment is not approved; therefore, an EIR is not required and an Environmental Assessment was given, and a negative declaration recommended. He recommended continuance to form discussion groups to solve problems and to contact adjacent communities. Planning Director stated that Avenue 34 is called Dinah Shore Drive only in Cathedral City, but the two ends of the street may never connect, so the renamed street in the City of Palm Springs should be Crossley Road. He described the street configuration on the board and stated that a study session will be scheduled if the Commission wants to have one, and that there should be a discussion on a street by street basis since it is a large issue and affects many residents. He stated that if Alejo Road is recommended to be built under the airport by the Commission, it should be discussed and a direction given. He stated that an article will be placed in the newspaper regarding the street changes. Chairman directed that the study session of January 20 include the amend- ment to the Circulation Element of the General Plan. M/S/C (Olsen/Neel ) continuing the item to January 27 with a study session scheduled for January 20. TRIBAL COUNCIL COMMENTS It was noted that the Planning Staff is recommending that this Case be continued to the Planning Commission's meeting of January 27, 1988. The Tribal Council concurred with this recommendation and withheld comments on the proposed amendments to the Circulation Element of the General Plan pending further review of Staff Report dated December 9, 1987. December 9, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 13 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) TPM 21832. Application by DESERT PROFESSIONAL BUILDING PARTNERS LIMITED for a tentative beparcel tween N map Palm Canbyone two parcls into Drivve/Indian Avenue, C 1n the north Zone, Sectionde of 10° Tachevah (An Environmental Assessment/Initial Study was previously reviewed in conjunction with Case 3.0193. ) Recommendation: That the Commission approves the map subject to condi- tions. Chairman declared the hearing open; there being no appearances, the hearing was closed. M/S/C (Neel/Curtis; Olsen abstained) approving TPM 21832 based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions. FINDINGS: 1. That a parcel map is the appropriate application for a lot consolidation. 2. That the proposed lot consolidation is in harmony with the Zoning Ordinance and objectives of the General Plan. 3. That the proposed lot consolidation is not detrimental to the surrounding property or the environment. CONDITIONS: That the Development Committee conditions of December 1, 1987, be met. PUBLIC COMMENTS - None. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS CASE 5.0346-CUP . PLANNING COMMISSION review of compliance with CUP conditions for Palm Springs Recycling Company on Oasis Road between Indian Avenue/Del Sol Road, M-1 Zone, Section 34. Planning Director stated that the original conditions of approval included review of the recycling plant operation in January of 1988 and that the plan is very successful but there are problems with the operation and is violating conditions of approval with trucks and bins blocking streets and open storage. He stated that the items should be continued to January 13 for individual Commissioners to review the operation in the field. He stated that the curb and gutter requirement should be reviewed and that several complaints have been received from businesses around the recycling plant. He stated that the applicant was notified of the meeting, but was not in attendance, but will be at the January 13, 1988 meeting. Commissioner Olsen stated that because semi-trucks are so long they are larger than the property and a car cannot get through the streets. I December 9, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 14 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS (Continued) CASE 5.0346-CUP. (Continued) Planning Director stated that the operation has outgrown the site and described the businesses and uses around the plant. He stated that the general area has been improving. M/S/C (Edgmon/Neel ) continuing the application to January 13, 1988. ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL ITEMS Approval of architectural cases is valid for two years. The approval granted must be exercised within that time period unless extended. CASE 3.752. Application by JOHN WESSMAN for architectural approval of revised site plan and elevations for remodel of the McCallum Civic Center complex at the southeast corner of Tahquitz-McCallum Way between Indian Avenue/S. Palm Canyon, CBD Zone, Section 15. Planning Director stated that the revised proposal by developer John Wessman would remove the library's east wing to create an opening to the plaza behind, and that the wing was constructed at the same time as the library, but was actually the original Desert Museum and that the AAC recommended concept approval subject to conditions including the east wing being removed and the area restored to its original condition. He stated that the previous library remodeling proposal has been withdrawn by the applicant, the front of the library will remain as it is, and that the original library architect, John Porter Clark, left the original plans of the old Desert Museum which should assist the working drawings for Mr. Wessman. He stated that the long term status of the building as far as the library operation is unknown and the agreement would allow the developer the right of first refusal if the library is closed and the City were to consider selling it. He stated that the east wing has approximately 1.200 Sq. ft. Redevelopment Director requested Commission action on whether or not the porches on the site should be open. M/S/C (Curtis/Hough) approving the revised site plan and elevations subject to the following conditions: 1. That the east wing portion of the library building be removed. 2. That the elevations of all sides of all structures be submitted. 3. That the porches be open. 4. That all recommendations of the Development Committee be met. December 9, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 15 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS (Continued) CIfY COUNCIL ACTIONS. Update of City Council actions. CASE 6.359-VARIANCE (Victors Restaurant Appeal ) . Council approved the variance with the same basic findings as the Herman Wouk Variance. COMMISSION/STAFF REPORTS OR REQUESTS. None. ADDED STARTERS. (Determination of eligibility for consideration. ) None. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Chairman adjourned the meeting at 3:45 p.m. PLANNING DIRECTOR MDR/ml WP/PC MINS