Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1987/09/09 - MINUTES (2) PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Council Chamber, City Hall September 9, 1987 1:30 p.m. ROLL CALL F-Y 1987 - 1988 Present Present Excused Absences Planning Commission This Meeting to Date to date Larry Lapham, Chairman X 4 0 Hugh Curtis X 4 0 Martha Edgmon X 3 1 Brent Hough X 3 1 Earl Neel X 3 1 Gary Olsen X 4 0 Barbara Whitney - 3 1 Staff Present Marvin D. Roos, Planning Director Siegfried Siefkes, Assistant City Attorney Douglas Evans, Planner Robert Green, Planner Margo Williams, Planner Carol Vankeeken, Planner John Terell, Redevelopment Planner Dave Forcucci , Zoning Enforcement Mary E. Lawler, Recording Secretary Architectural Advisory Committee - Tuesday, September 8, 1987 �-' Chris Mills, Chairman Absent: Mike Buccino Tom Doczi Barbara Whitney Martha Edgmon, Alternate Brent Hough William Johnson Will Kleindienst Gary Olsen Chairman called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. M/S/C (Curtis/Neel; Whitney absent) approving minutes of August 12, 1987 with the following addition: Page 14, Case 5.0448-CUP. 4. Add (after "applicant"), "except that improvements recommended by the Engineering Division are to be waived." M/S/C (Olsen/Hough; Whitney absent) amending the July 22, 1987, Minutes, Case 3.0266 (Minor) as follows: Page 13, Delete: "that banners will be placed across the streets near the tram and downtown". Add (in the condition after "be reviewed by staff"), "and that banners across the streets are denied." 1 September 9, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 2 CONSENT ACTION AGENDA Approval of architectural cases is valid for two years. The approval granted must be exercised within that time period unless extended. M/S/C (Curtis/Edgmon; Whitney absent) taking the following actions: CASE 3.0263 (MINOR) (CONTINUED) . Application by SIERRA ENERGY SYSTEMS for archi- tectural approval of mechanical equipment structure at 2601 Golf Club Drive, (The Plaza Resort) , R-3 Zone, Section 29. Continued to September 23. CASE 3.0128 (MINOR) . Application by GEORGE MARANTZ for architectural approval of detailed landscape plans for enlarged parking lot at 1021 South Palm Canyon Drive, C-2 and R-3 Zones, Section 22. Restudy for review by the AAC on a field trip. CASE 3.0191. Application by GREAT AMERICAN MINI STORAGE for architectural approval of revised detailed landscape, irrigation, and exterior lighting plans for office and warehouse building on Farrell Drive/Research Drive, M- 1-P Zone, Section 12. Removed from the agenda at the applicant's request. CASE 3.0237. Application by VITO DiSTEFANO for architectural approval of a two unit apartment building at 1340 Camino Amapola between Thornhill Drive/Calle Amigo, R-2 Zone, Section 23. Restudy noting the following: : 1. That the roof pitch be lessened and that all sides of roof to be same pitch. 2. That the south elevation be simpler in detail and applicant to explore expanding south elevation to include wing walls or garden walls to increase the appearance. CASE 3.0267 (MINOR) . Application by DENNY' S INC. for architectural approval of revised exterior colors for restaurant at 727 East Palm Canyon Drive, R-3 Zone, Section 26. Approved subject to the following condition: That the colors match the adjacent hotel . September 9, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 3 CONSENT ACTION AGENDA (Continued) CASE 3.0269 (MINOR) . Application by JERRY LISS for architectural approval of revised plans for display cases in the Vineyard retail complex, 245 South Palm Canyon Drive, C-B-D Zone, Section 15. (Ref. Case 2.960) Continued to September 23. CASE 3.0280 (MINOR) . Application by KENNETH FISCHER for architectural approval of remodel of building at 850 South Palm Canyon Drive, C-1 Zone, Section 23. Continued to September 23 at the applicant's request. CASE 3.0285 (MINOR) . Application by ELEGANT AWNINGS for architectural approval of awning for business at 224 North Palm Canyon Drive, C-B-D Zone, Section 15. Approved subject to the following , condition* That the awning match the approved program in color and shape. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT ACTION AGENDA Approval of architectural cases is valid for two years. The approval granted must be exercised within that time period unless extended. CASE 3.0257 (REF. CASE 7.672 - AMM) . Application by MAURO VISCIGLIO/MICHAEL SEM for architectural approval of single family residence on Dunham Road/Andreas Hills Drive, R-1-C Zone, Section 1. Planner (Williams) stated that the AAC recommended a restudy noting concerns with building mass, the roof line, setbacks, and integration of the pool area and the west elevation with the building design. She stated that a letter had been received from an attorney representing a neighbor objecting to the height of the chimneys, view obstruction, and roof line. She described the pad height in relation to the street and adjoining lot. Chairman recommended that a site line study be prepared by the applicant. M/S/C (Olsen/Curtis; Whitney absent) for a restudy noting the following: 1. That the setback on Andreas Hills Drive be adhered to (16' w/AMM) . 2. That the roof line/building mass be reevaluated. 3. That the west elevations and pool area patio structure be better integrated with the building design. 4. That the applicant prepare a site line study from adjacent prop- erties. September 9, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 4 ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT ACTION AGENDA (Continued) CASE 3.0275 (MINOR) . Application by LA VIE EN ROSE for architectural approval of revised plans for a storefront in the Vineyard retail complex, 245 South Palm Canyon Drive, C-B-D Zone, Section 15. (Ref. Case 2.0960) Planner (Williams) presented the revised design and stated that the AAC recommended approval since the applicant had addressed the Committee's concerns about integration of the storefront with the building. M/S/C (Olsen/Neel; Whitney absent) approving the revised applications sub- ject to the following condition: That landscape materials be submitted for staff review. CASE 3.0284 (MINOR) . Application by B & S OXYGEN for architectural approval of a main identification sign for business at 1111 Montalvo Way, M-1-P Zone, Section 7. Zoning Enforcement Officer explained that the applicant had taken over a vacant space in the complex and had erected a second sign without permit which the applicant feels will increase his visibility, but that the sign ordinance allows only one sign; and that if the second sign is approved by the Commission, the first one will have to be removed. He stated that the second sign type is different from the approved sign program, and that channel letters on the stucco wall would be a more appealing type of sign. Planning Director explained that the AAC recommends restudy of the design of the sign, and that staff requested discussion because the request for a second sign involves a sign ordinance issue since the applicant would be required to apply for a sign variance which if approved would alter the sign program for the complex. Commissioner Curtis stated that one sign should be sufficient, and that individual letters would be more appropriate and in keeping with the sign program. M/S/C (Curtis/Olsen; Whitney absent) approving one sign with free standing letters. CASE 3.0287 (MINOR) . Application by JIMSAIR AVIATION SERVICES for architectural approval of signs and revised landscaping for Jimsair/JB's Deli at 145 S. Gene Autry Trail , A Zone, Section 18. Zoning Enforcement Officer stated that Jimsair is applying for signs to identify the carwash and for gas prices and requesting a freestanding 12 inch high letter on a laminated beam and 6 inch letters at the entrance, and that the plastic letters would be the same type as the existing signs. He stated that the gas signs would be mounted on two front poles, double faced (14 and 17 feet respectively). �-- —Commissioner Edgmon suggested that the price signs be integrated with the building instead of on a post and stated that the carwash sign would be better on the stucco than on the beam. September 9, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 5 ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT ACTION AGENDA (Continued) CASE 3.0287 (Continued) Commissioner Olsen noted that there a number of gas price signs in the city that are monument signs and are attractive and that Jimsair signing should be similar. Planning Director explained that when the service station deli carwash com- plex was approved, there was a requirement that signage be on the building or the wall along Gene Autry and no additional freestanding signs were to be allowed. He stated that the applicant agreed to the program, although there was no operator at the time the program was approved, and that the signage along Gene Autry could be revised, although the size of the gas price signs would dominate unless the rest of the signage is enlarged. He stated also that the conditions on the landscaping will be reviewed. M/S/C (Hough/Edgmon; Whitney absent) approving the landscaping plan subject to the following condition: That alternate vine materials may be used. (To be reviewed by staff. ) M/S/C (Olsen/Edgmon; Whitney absent) for a restudy of the sign. PUBLIC HEARINGS CASE 5.0437-PD-187 (Continued) . Application by KAPTUR & CIOFFI for Motel 6 Inc. for a planned development district to allow construction of a 150-unit hotel on South Palm Canyon Drive between Camino Parocela/Sunny Dunes Road, C-2/R-2/C-M Zones, Section 23. (Commission response to written comments on Draft Negative Declaration; action. No comment received. ) Planner (Williams) presented the case stating that the application was ten- tatively approved August 12 by the Commission and continued for review of final environmental documents, including a traffic study and a resolution of intersection design at the south center entrance. She stated that an existing driveway adjacent to the Wherehouse store would be shifted south, that the remaining driveway to Sun Center would be closed; that there would be realignment and restriping of parking within the center lot; that the median island sould be modified and a traffic signal installed or relocated; that Parocela half street improvements would be completed and that frontage improvements will be made to Palm Canyon, Camino Parocela and Calle Chia. She stated that there are some deviations from the Zoning Ordinance because of the changes which will be resolved with staff, that Cal Trans has apparently approved the design subject to further review, and that the traffic mitigation plan will require significant off-site improve- ments on property which is not under the applicant's control (the Sun Center) . She stated that staff is meeting with the Redevelopment Agency and the Sun Center for an acceptable solution since signed agreements will be required before the intersection design can be implemented. She stated that the parking plan for the Center does not meet code as drawn and will require further study. Commissioner Curtis stated that 900 parking will be difficult at Sun Center. September 9, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 6 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE 5.0437 (Continued) Planner stated that there will be two major access points to the hotel . One at the main entrance of Parocela, and a right turn in and out only on Palm Canyon. Planning Director stated that an incentive for the Sun Center to partici- pate would be access to and from Palm Canyon Drive. Planner stated that the design will also help the Sun Center traffic circu- lation, and that the revised plan shows a landscape buffer adjacent to Palm Canyon, open space throughout the site, and that additional open space is shown around the east frontage and an additional frontage has been added on Chia. She stated that 20 feet of open space has been redistributed throughout the site. Commissioner Olsen stated that the Planning Commission did not approve of shifting of the building. Planning Director explained that the architect is now requesting that the building be shifted for their own reasons not because of the previous AAC recommendations. Chairman declared the hearing open. James Cioffi , 700 E. Tahquitz, project architect, stated that he was pre- sent to answer questions. Planning Director asked whether or not there was enough parking space in the project to eliminate the 5 spaces near the pool. Mr. Cioffi stated that the spaces could be added in other areas, especially if the unit count falls below 149, and that he would resolve elimination and redistribution of the parking spaces with staff. There being no further appearances, Chairman declared the hearing closed. Commissioner Curtis stated that the project is well designed and will enhance the area. M/S/C (Curtis/Neel ; Hough abstained; Whitney absent) ordering the filing of a negative declaration and approving PD 147 based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: Findings 1. That the use applied for is one for which a planned development dis- trict is authorized by the Zoning Ordinance, namely the creation of a commercial development with desirable deviations from the strict application of the zoning ordinance. 2. That the proposed use is desirable for the community and will be a boost economically to the redevelopment area in which it is located. The development is in harmony with the elements of the General Plan. September 9, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 7 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE 5.0437 (Continued) 3. The design of the site is compatible with the surrounding uses and should not cause any detrimental effects, provided the issue of the traffic impacts can be resolved. 4. The site relates to the streets and will be properly designed to carry the traffic generated by the development. 5. The conditions imposed upon the development are necessary and in the public's best interest. Conditions 1. That all conditions of the Development Committee dated August 5, 1987, be met. 2. That all conditions of the sewer study be met. 3. That all conditions of the traffic study be met as outlined: a. That the design for the intersection modification and resignal- ization occur in accordance with Exhibit "A" dated 9/8/87. b. That the "Exhibit A" design be approved and accepted by the City Traffic Engineer and Caltrans. ' C. That seasonal turning movement counts will be submitted as a part of the final design (for signal phasing). d. That final intersection designs and necessary agreements between affected property owners will be reviewed by the Planning Commission and City Council as a part of the final development plans. 4. That all conditions of the environmental assessment shall apply. Including the following: a. Review of the preliminary and final grading plans as a portion of final development plans. b. Review of on-site lighting. C. Compliance with mitigation measures from sewer and traffic studies as outlined above. CASE 5.0447-CUP (Continued) . Application by RON OLIPHANT for a conditional use permit for a dental office and professional building on Ramon Road between Avenida Evelita/Calle Ricardo, R-2 Zone, Section 19. (Commission response to written comment; no comments received; action. ) Planner (Vankeeken) stated that the buildings were reversed giving more landscaping (per Commission recommendations at the August 12 meeting) . September 9, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 8 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE 5.0447 (Continued) Chairman declared the hearing open. Ron Oliphant, 522 Cecil Drive, Whitewater, project architect, stated that he was present to answer questions, and that Commission concerns had been addressed. M/S/C (Hough/Edgmon; Whitney absent) approving CUP 5.0447 based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: Findings 1. That the use applied for is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized by the Zoning Ordinance. 2. That the use is desirable within the Community and is in harmony with the General Plan and the facility is not detrimental to existing or proposed uses in the zone. 3. That the 20,534 sq. ft. site is adequate in size and shape to accom- modate the proposed use, including parking, and circulation. 4. That Ramon Road, Avenida Evelita, and Calle Di Ricardo service the site and are capable of handling traffic generated on the site. Conditions 1. That conditions of the Development Committee Minutes (dated July 24, 1987 shall be implemented. 2. That the bevel on connecting roof to be eliminated. 3. That the trash enclosure location be reviewed by staff. CASE 5.0450-CZ. Application by CULVER NICHOLS for a change of zone from G-R-5 to R-2 for property on East Vista Chino between Avenida Caballeros/Sunrise Way, G-R-5 Zone, Section 11. Recommendation: That the application be removed from the agenda pending a General Plan Amendment Study. Planner (Green) presented the case and stated that a change of zone is being supported by staff since there has been little demand for the horse- related activities allowed by the current zoning, and that the property is one of the last pieces of G-R-5 Zoning in the city. He stated that if the Commission feels that a zone change is acceptable, a General Plan amendment study would be undertaken by staff. Chairman declared the hearing open. Chris Mills, 221 South Palm Canyon Drive, project architect, representing the applicant, explained that the zone change would allow more appropriate September 9, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 9 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE 5.0450 (Continued) type, of uses for the property based on surrounding uses and that some interest has been shown for a congregate care use on the property which is more intense in density that the G-R-5 Zone. There being no further appearances, Chairman declared the hearing closed. Planning Director stated that a General Plan review would be made to include the church and the Ranch Club condominiums to make the area con- sistent with the General Plan, and that the 5 acre vacant school property west of the site is zoned "0" which would not be changed but could be reviewed if the school district requested a zone change in the future. He explained that G-R-5 Zoning was prevalent throughout the city in the 1940's. M/S/C (Olsen/Curtis; Whitney absent) removing the zone change from the agenda pending a General Plan Amendment Study. CASE 5.0451-CUP. Application by ALEXANDER COLER for a conditional use permit to light a tennis court and to install a kitchen in a guest house at 555 Via Monte Vista between Crescent Drive/Alejo Road, R-1-A Zone, Section 10. (This action is categorically exempt from Environmental Assessment per CEQA guidelines. ) Recommendation: That the Commission approve the application subject to conditions. Planner (Green) stated that the two part application is for lights for a tennis court and to install a kitchen in a guest house, that the light height would be 17 feet from the recessed court and that the court is 180 feet from the property line. He stated that in most single-family prop- erties with abutting properties, lights are only allowed as high as the tennis court fence, but that staff recommends approval of the lights because of the distance from the property line, and that staff also recom- September 9, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 10 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE 5.0451 (Continued) mends approval of the kitchen in the guest house because of the estate type of lot and the fact that the guest house will not become an apartment. He stated that two letters of opposition to lighting the court have been received objecting to the obtrusion of light to the hillside, devaluation of property, and disturbance to residents and desert animals. He stated that one letter objected to noise generated by the court which is not an issue to be addressed at the meeting. Chairman declared the hearing open. Alexander Coler, the applicant, stated that the court is 180 feet to the rear of the nearest property on 182 acres of land with the tennis court being 400 to 450 feet from Via Monte Vista, that trees have been planted along the north boundary line which will be eighteen feet high within a year, and that he felt the light would not disturb anyone given the character and the size of the property. Frank Wiskowski , 1500 S. Palm Canyon, speaking on behalf of Sam Gordon who resides on Crescent Drive, spoke in opposition to the already installed (without permits) lights and also in opposition to the golf course because the Gordons are finding golf balls in their yard which will endanger newly installed leaded glass windows which now have to be protected. He stated that the row of Eucalyptus impairs the neighbors' view and that the Gordons bought the property next to a flood control property believing that it would not be developed and are now faced with a nearby golf course and golf balls that are not deflected by the trees although the trees will obsure the view. Planner described the landscaped area of the golf course. Joyce Ellis speaking on behalf of her mother who resides at 707 Cresent, stated that her mother feels similarily to the Gordons, thought nothing would be built in the back when she bought the property, and that the noise associated with the tennis court will disturb her mother's rest because her bedroom is directly opposite the tennis court. There being no further appearances, Chairman declared the hearing closed. Chairman asked if there were some type of restriction on a golf course in an R-1-A Zone. Planning Director replied that it is considered private landscaping, not a public course, and it has only three holes and three tees on 18 acres. Chairman replied that it is a most unusual condition in an R-1-A Zone and perhaps unneighborly, and that perhaps the applicant should keep that in mind since he is violating his neighbors' space with golf balls. Commissioner Neel commented that the Eucalyptus trees on 6 ft. centers will be raising the tennis court foundation, but if topped would probably be acceptable. September 9, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 11 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE 5.0451 (Continued) Planning Director explained that the Eucalyptus trees are 180 feet away from the tennis courts in staggered rows on the property line and planted there to capture stray golf balls. Commissioner Olsen asked if the Commission should be addressing the golf ball problem, and Chairman replied that it could be addressed under a CUP application. Planning Director stated that all aspects of interest should be reviewed. In reply to Commissioner Edgmon, Planner stated that the tennis court lights were installed without approval . In reply to Chairman, Planning Director stated that the tennis court is at the base of the mountain, was approved with the original house, and was a reasonable request at the time. Commissioner Hough stated that he did not believe the tennis court would create a problem because of the distance from the neighbors, and that the trees will diminish the noise and light and the golf course is not a problem. He stated that the applicant would be responsible for broken windows although he realizes that it is not a solution for the neighbors. M/S/C (Hough/Olsen; Whitney absent; Neel/Lapham dissented) approving CUP 5.0451 based on the following findings and subject to the following condi- tions: Findings 1. That adequate on-site parking exists for both the main house and the guest unit. 2. That the site is adequate in size (25 acres) and shape to accommodate the guest unit with kitchen and an illuminated tennis court. 3. That adequate setbacks and landscaping have been provided to minimize any adverse impacts of the tennis court lights on adjoining properties. 4. That the tennis court is immediately adjacent to the toe of a steep hillside eliminating visibility to properties to the south. 5. That the proposals are in harmony with the General Plan and and are not detrimental to existing or future uses permitted in the zone. 6. That the tennis court and guest house with kitchen may be considered under a Conditional Use Permit as specified by the Zoning Ordinance. 7. That conditions imposed are necessary to protect the public health, safety and general welfare. September 9, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 12 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE 5.0451 (Continued) Conditions 1. That all recommendations of the Development Committee be met. 2. That a permit be obtained for lights installed without permit for the tennis court. CONSENT ACTION AGENDA (Continued) Approval of architectural cases is valid for two years. The approval granted must be exercised within that time period unless extended. CASE 5.0379-PD-174. Application by EQUESTRIAN V INC. for architectural approval of final development plans for an equestrian center on Sonora Road/El Cielo Road, W-R-1C Zone, Section 19. Planning Director stated that there are seven conditions of approval recom- mended by the AAC, and that the applicant objects to an alternate edging to the redwood headers. Richard Finan, 71411 Cholla, Palm Desert, stated that the AAC recommended a concrete header rather than redwood and that he has no objections, but that that railroad ties (suggested by the Commission) would be more expensive, and that he had no objection to changing the fencing or increasing the size of trees and landscaping at the entrance or on Gene Autry Trail , but would object to increasing sizes and numbers of trees on the interior of the project. Planner stated that the AAC was concerned about screening the adjoining single family area; felt the same tree species should be on both sides of the driveway and accepted 15 gallon size Eucalyptus. He stated that the trees on the plan were Ashes, Sumac, Willow, and Mesquite with California Pepper on the boundaries, and that the adjacent land was owned by developer John Wessman. Mr. Finan stated that there are five acres of permanent vacant land as a buffer for the single family residences. Commissioner Edgmon commented that if the land were to be developed, screening would be necessary. Planner stated that there is a 15 ft. buffer strip of landscaping on the boundary. Discussion continued. Chairman stated that the 24 inch box size requirement for 80% of the perimeter is necessary but there is no need for 50% of the interior trees to be 24 inch box size since they will be fast-growing, and that the main landscaping concern should be at the entrance and on the perimeters. Planning Director stated that the 80-50 requirement is a guideline which could be changed by the Commission. M/S/C (Edgmon/Hough; Curtis/Neel/Olsen abstained; Whitney absent) approving final development plans for PD 174 subject to the following conditions: September 9, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 13 CONSENT ACTION AGENDA (Continued) CASE 5.0379 (Continued) 1. That all recommendations of the Development Committee be met. 2. That Mesquite be substituted for Acacia on the westerly boundary. 3. That California Peppers be added at the west side of the driveway. 4. That Tecoma be intermixed with Lantana at the entry, and that the layout shall be informal. 5. That 80% of the street and entrance trees and 15% of the interior trees must be 24 inch box size or larger. (Eucalyptus may remain at 15 gal . sizes. ) 6. That the chainlink fence be coated with Eonite. 7. That larger trees shall be located in the south western corner of the site. 8. That alternate durable edging material shall be added in lieu of the redwood header. PUBLIC COMMENTS - None. ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL ITEMS Approval of architectural cases is valid for two years. The approval granted must be exercised within that time period unless extended. CASE 5.0277-PD-149. Application by ST. THERESA'S CHURCH for architectural approval of revised site plans for a church rectory at 2800 East Ramon Road between Compadre Road/Farrell Drive, R-1-A Zone, Section 13. Planner (Green) stated that the building of the rectory has been moved from Phase 3 to Phase 2; that staff supports the change since two old buildings will be demolished in conjunction with the rectory construction; that the design is compatible with that of the church, that some parking spaces will be removed, but the church has a recipical parking arrangement with the adjacent office building which provides sufficient parking spaces and that a small portion of the construction is in the setbacks, but the average exceeds the requirements. He stated that the AAC recommends approval . Chairman stated that the project architect had complemented the William Coty design of the church very well . M/S/C (Neel/Hough; Whitney absent) approving the revised site plan subject to the following condition: That a detailed landscape lighting and irrigation plan be submitted. September 9, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 14 ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL ITEMS (Continued) CASE 3.0193. Application by JAMES CIOFFI representing James Shigur for archi- tectural approval of revised plans for a medical complex on Tachevah Drive between N. Palm Canyon Drive/N. Indian Avenue, C-1 Zone, Section 10. Planner (Williams) explained that the site plan designed by the new architectural firm is the same as the original , but the elevations have been revised. Commissioner Curtis stated that the project architect had done very well in addressing Commission concerns on views, setbacks, and parking. M/S/C (Curtis/Neel ; Edgmon/Olsen abstaining; Whitney absent) approving the application subject to the following conditions: 1. That all recommendations of the Development Committee be met. 2. That final landscape irrigation and exterior leighting plans be submitted prior to issuance of building permits. 3. That a sign program be submitted. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS CASE 85.133. Request by JEFF WILSON for a waiver of parcel map/certificate of `—' compliance of parcel map on property north of Mesquite Avenue on Desert Way, R-1-C Zone, Section 19. Planning Director explained that Desert Way dead ends into Parcels 21 and 22, which would make one of the lots smaller in that the Certificate of Compliance is for Parcel 21 which has a lot size of 8800 sq. ft. He stated that the Engineering Division does not want to extend Desert Way, but is requiring a turnaround to be approved by the Traffic Engineer as a condi- tion of the building permit and drainage easements across the property because water is crossing the property presently which flows through the Youth Center; and that a condition of approval would be that a dedication or easement be given to the City by the applicant. He noted that Desert Way would not be extended to Mesquite because Mountain View ties into the parking lot and would be too close to the extension and that Parcel 22 is a non-buildable site at this point since some dedication will be required off Mesquite, and even if two lots were combined there would be only one building site. He stated that the condition is unusual and a certificate of compliance/lot line adjustment is the necessary procedure. In reply to Commissioner Curtis, he stated that a cul-de-sac will not be required -just a small hammer head which would not be expensive and would not make Lot 22 more restrictive than it is, and that Lot 22 would not be recognized as a building site and is not in the same ownership as Parcel 21. He stated that the City would not be discriminating against the owner of Parcel 22 because that lot has different conditions regarding right-of-way and would not be able to be developed because of lack of setbacks. M/S/C (Neel/Edgmon; Whitney absent) approving the waiver of Parcel Maps/Certificate of Compliance subject to the following conditions. September 9, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 15 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS (Continued) CASE 85.133 (Continued) 1. That a turnaround for vehicles be provided at the south end of Desert Way, the design of such turnaround to be approved by the Traffic Engineer. 2. That a drainage easement be dedicated by the owner of the lot to con- vey the water leaving the end of the street to the existing drainage inlet structure near the southwest corner of the property. ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL ITEMS (Continued) Approval of architectural cases is valid for two years. The approval granted must be exercised within that time period unless extended. CASE 3.0231. Application by PAUL J. SCOTT for architectural approval of a single family dwelling at 1717 Scotia Lane between Vista Chino/San Juan Road, N-R- 1-C Zone, Section 1. Planner (Vankeeken) presented the project. Commissioner Curtis suggested that well-designed plans be required for single family residence in the future. M/S/C (Hough/Edgmon; Whitney absent) approving the application subject to the following conditions: 1. That vertical wood trim to be added to garage windows. 2. That the A/C Compressor be relocated to the rear yard (north or west side) . 3. That the columns and wing walls be 18" thick (minimum) . 4. That the landscape plan (preliminary) be restudied to include a more integrated design, and larger and more quantity of tree forms. 5. That all recommendations of the Development Committee be implemented. CASE 5.0424-CUP. Application by MARRIOTT CORPORATION for architectural approval of detailed landscape, exterior lighting, and irrigation plans for a 179 unit hotel on the east side of Hermosa Drive between Tahquitz Way/Andreas Drive, R-4-VP/C-1-AA (IL) , Section 14. Planner (Green) presented the project stating that a restudy was recommended by the AAC noting that the materials were too small and insufficient. Planning Director recommended that an additional condition be added - that the project meet the 50% shading requirement in the parking lot per the revised Zoning Ordinance. He stated that the paving on Tahquitz is stamped. r September 9, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 16 ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL ITEMS (Continued) CASE 5.0424-CUP (Continued) M/S/C (Curtis/Edgmon; Neel abstained; Whitney absent) for a restudy noting the following: 1. That Washingtonia Filifera be intermixed with W. Robusta throughout. 2. That Palms be added to the Hermosa elevation and to the interior courtyard (southeast and southwestern corners) . 3. That palms be increased in height. 4. That berming be added to the lawn areas on the Tahquitz frontage. 5. That decorative paving be added to the Hermosa entry. 6. That accent shrub, groundcover and annuals planting be added at all entry/exits. 7. That street trees be added along the Andreas frontage. 8. That trees be added to islands in the northerly parking lot. 9. That citrus trees be more widely spaced. 10. That Bottle trees be increased to 24" box size on the easterly boundary. 11. That an alternate species for Liriope be used (suggest Boxwood Beauty). 12. That Phorium be examined for suitability for the desert climate. 13. That shrubs and groundcover be used in lieu of lawn in the northerly parking lot. 14. That textured paving shall be added to the Hermosa entry. The Commission noted that a condition of approval will be a 50% shading requirement in the parking lot. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS (Continued) CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS. Update of City Council actions. CASE 3.572 (Welwood Murray Library Project) . Council approved sale and renovation of the Library. Mayor Bogert stated that some of the people who complained about the sale and renovation should refurbish their own businesses on South Palm Canyon Drive. Council has not dealt with the architectural issues of the Welwood Murray Library building. September 9, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 17 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS (Continued) CASE 3.309 (Bank of Palm Springs Center) . Applicants requested waiving of requirement to renovate the fa:,cade. Council felt that the renovation plans were not the best, but did not waive the requirement. Staff recommended waiting a year to see if the center prospers with the opening of the theaters, the convention center and hotel before the owner is required to comply with the renovation of the facade. Chairman stated that he did like the revised design because the mixture of elements was cluttered. Commissioner Curtis stated that the theaters do not resemble the rest of the projects except for materials. Commissioner Edgmon stated that the design balances with the large bank building on the opposite corner. Planning Director stated that if the middle building were removed and some attention-drawing element designed for the center, it might attract people driving by. Discussion continued on ways to improve the appearance of the complex. Planning Director stated that there may be surplus parking and an incentive might be to have the owner build in more frontage as an incentive to retain the parking. COMMISSION/STAFF REPORTS OR REQUESTS. - Industrial Area South of the Airport. Planning Director stated that the Commercial and Industrial areas should not be mixed and that a retail store would require a conditional use permit. - Vista Chino at the Corner of Palm Canyon. Planning Director stated that there is no requirement nor program to widen the street, but the situation will be reviewed. He stated that Germaine's liquor store is probably in the path of widening Vista Chino. Commissioner Neel stated that cars park along the red curb and cause a traffic problem. - Canyon Hotel Landscaping. Planning Director stated that a notice of code violation will be sent to the owners to irrigate the landscaping because the plants are dying. - Lansdale Property Wall on Araby. Planning Director stated it would be painted out, eliminating the white coat. - Orchid Tree Hotel Wall . Planning Director stated that the wall will be slurried and painted to match the building. (Ref. Case 3.0205 (MINOR) . ) ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to discuss, Chairman adjourned the meeting at 3:45 p.m. �✓ v PLANNING DI C R MDR/ml PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Council Chamber, City Hall September 23, 1987 1:30 p.m. ROLL CALL F-Y 1987 - 1988 Present Present Excused Absences Planning Commission This Meeting to Date to date Larry Lapham, Chairman X 5 0 Hugh Curtis X 5 0 Martha Edgmon X 4 1 Brent Hough X 4 1 Earl Neel X 4 1 Gary Olsen X 5 0 Barbara Whitney X 4 1 Staff Present Marvin D. Roos, Planning Director Siegfried Siefkes, Assistant City Attorney Robert Green, Planner Margo Williams, Planner John Terell , Redevelopment Planner Jerry Gonzalez, Traffic Engineer Bill Hudak, Zoning Enforcement Officer Mary E. Lawler, Recording Secretary Architectural Advisory Committee - September 21, 1987 • Chris Mills, Chairman Absent: Mike Buccino Tom Doczi Martha Edgmon, Alternate Brent Hough William Johnson Will Kleindienst Gary Olsen Barbara Whitney Chairman called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. M/S/C (Olsen/Hough) approving minutes of September 9, 1987 as submitted. ADMINISTRATIVE NOTE: Vice Chairman Curtis presided.