Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1987/09/09 - MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Council Chamber, City Hall September 9, 1987 1:30 p.m. ROLL CALL F-Y 1987 - 1988 Present Present Excused Absences Planning Commission This Meeting to Date to date Larry Lapham, Chairman X 4 0 Hugh. Curtis X 4 0 Martha Edgmon X 3 1 Brent Hough X 3 1 Earl Neel X 3 1 Gary Olsen X 4 0 Barbara Whitney - 3 1 Staff Present Marvin D. Roos, Planning Director Siegfried Siefkes, Assistant City Attorney Douglas Evans, Planner Robert Green, Planner Margo Williams, Planner Carol Vankeeken, Planner John Terell , Redevelopment Planner Dave Forcucci , Zoning Enforcement Mary E. Lawler, Recording Secretary Architectural Advisory Committee - Tuesday, September 8, 1987 Chris Mills, Chairman Absent: Mike Buccino Tom Doczi Barbara Whitney Martha Edgmon, Alternate Brent Hough William Johnson Will Kleindienst Gary Olsen Chairman called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. M/S/C (Curtis/Neel ; Whitney absent) approving minutes of August 12, 1987'with the following addition: Page 14, Case 5.0448-CUP. 4. Add (after "applicant") , "except- that improvements recommended by the Engineering Division are to be waived." M/S/C (Olsen/Hough; Whitney absent) amending the July 22, 1987, Minutes, Case 3.0266 (Minor) as follows: Page 13, Delete: "that banners will be placed across the streets near the tram and downtown". ,., Add (in the condition after "be reviewed by staff") , "and that banners across the streets are denied." PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Council Chamber, City Hall August 12, 1987 1:30 p.m. ROLL CALL F-Y 1987 - 1988 Present Present Excused Absences Planning Commission This Meeting to Date to date Larry Lapham, Chairman X 3 0 Hugh Curtis X 3 0 Martha Edgmon X 2 1 Brent Hough - 2 1 Earl Neel X 3 0 Gary Olsen X 3 0 Barbara Whitney X 3 0 Staff Present Marvin D. Roos, Planning Director Siegfried Siefkes, Assistant City Attorney Douglas Evans, Planner Robert Green, Planner Richard Patenaude, Planner Margo Williams, Planner Carol Vankeeken, Planner Dave Forcucci , Zoning Enforcement Jerry Gonzalez, Traffic Engineer Ken Feenstra, Redevelopment Director Mary E. Lawler, Recording Secretary Architectural Advisory Committee - August 10, 1987 Chris Mills, Chairman Absent: Martha Edgmon, Alternate Tom Doczi Mike Buccino William Johnson Brent Hough Will Kleindienst Gary Olsen Barbara Whitney Chairman called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. M/S/C (Neel/Olsen; Hough absent) approving minutes of July 22, 1987 as submitted. ADMINISTRATIVE NOTE: There were no Tribal Council comments. August 12, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 2 J CONSENT ACTION AGENDA Approval of architectural cases is valid for two years. The approval granted must be exercised within that time period unless extended. M/S/C (Curtis/Neel; Hough absent) taking the following actions: CASE 3.0131. Application by SONNY BONO for architectural approval of a retaining wall for a single family hillside residence at 294 Crestview, R-1-C Zone, Section 27. Approved, subject to the following condition: That landscape, exterior lighting and irrigation plans be submitted within 90 days. APPLICATION 3.0248 (MINOR). Application by ELEGANT AWNINGS for architectural approval of revised plans for awning at 218 N. Palm Canyon Drive, C-B-D Zone, Section 15. Approved, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the awning be green in color. 2. That the size of the awning match the existing awning to the north. CASE 3.0273 (MINOR). Application by STAN STOKES for architectural approval of pool side cabana for Royal Sun Hotel on S. Palm Canyon Drive, R-3 Zone, Section 26. Restudy. CASE 5.0402-PD-181. Application by CATHOLIC CHARITIES for architectural approval of revised fencing materials for emergency housing/shelter on DeAnza Road between Pico Road/Sepulveda Road, R-G-A(6) Zone, Section 3. Approved as submitted. CASE 3.0194 (MINOR) . Application by CHRISTIAN & BOUCHARD for Robert D. Lemley for architectural approval of a revised awning for Robbie Reeds Restaurant at 500 E. Palm Canyon Drive, R-3 Zone, Section 23. Planner (Vankeeken) presented the case stating that the awning will protect patrons from the elements. M/S/C (Curtis/Whitney; Hough absent) approving the application, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the wall be stucco, not brick as proposed. 2. That the wall below windows be stucco. 3. That the upper windows be single pane. 4. That the entry door be more contemporary. August 12, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 3 CASE 3.0261 (MINOR) . Application by DAVID HAMILTON for architectural approval of revised plans for new entry gates for Canyon Heights Condominium project at S. Palm Canyon Drive/Murray Canyon Drive, R-1-A Zone (I.L. ), Section 34. (Ref. Case 5.0032-PD-78) Planner (Evans) presented the case. He stated that the AAC dissenters (Whitney and Kleindienst) felt that the design should complement the frontage. M/S/C (Olsen/Edgmon; Whitney dissented; Hough absent) approving the application, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the swing arm gate be removed. 2. That cross bars be removed from the entry gate. CASE 3.0265 (MINOR) . Application by INTERNATIONAL HOTEL RESORTS for architectural approval of flag program for hotel at 1800 E. Palm Canyon Drive, R-3 Zone, Section 24. M/S/C (Olsen/Whitney; Hough absent) tabling the application. M/S/C (Olsen/Neel; Hough absent) untabling the application. Zoning Enforcement Officer stated that the flag detail has been restudied several times, that the hotel wants to add color to the front for a more pleasing appearance to the frontage, that eight (8) flags were originally proposed, and that the AAC recommended flags on either side of the porte cochere (which was restudied) and a suggestion was made by the Committee to place the flags in the planter area. He stated that, after a field trip, staff determined that it was impractical to place in them in the planter areas because of lack of room and because the 20-foot flagpoles would interfere with the main sign. M/S/C (Edgmon/Neel ; Hough absent) for a restudy, noting the following: That flags should not be located on the building, but on the ground with pole height to be approximately 20 feet (location and revised plans to include landscaping and lighting) . CASE 3.0267 (MINOR). Application by DENNY'S INC. for architectural approval of exterior color revisions for restaurant at 727 E. Palm Canyon Drive, R-3 Zone, Section 26. Planner (Williams) stated that an AAC field trip was taken to review color revisions and a split vote occurred among the AAC members, resulting in no vote; and that the proposed colors are the same as those on Denny' s North, but the restaurant is associated with the Westward Ho Hotel and the AAC felt that the colors should be more compatible with the hotel . Chairman commented that a 2-2 vote is a restudy. M/S/C (Olsen/Neel; Hough absent) for a restudy to make the colors more compatible with the Westward Ho Hotel . August 12, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 4 CASE 3.0269 (MINOR). Application by JERRY LISS for architectural approval of revisions to a storefront in the Vineyard retail complex, 245 S. Palm Canyon Drive, C-B-D Zone, Section 15. (Ref. Case 2.960) Planner (Williams) stated that the store space is in the rear of the Vineyard complex and that the doors and windows were approved by the AAC, but the display cases on the north side, which will display rugs, were not approved, and that the applicants were not at the AAC meeting on August 10. Ron Oliphant, Box 522, Whitewater Drive, representing the applicant, stated that the display cases will cover wood paneling on the north side fronting on the corridor and that the cases will be 10 to 12 inches deep. Planning Director stated that the display cases will be on the north exterior and will be visible from Palm Canyon Drive. Mr. Oliphant commented that the cases would create interest to the corridor, and that the panels will be attached to the access doors to mechanical rooms. John Baker, 555 South Palm Canyon, Carver Company representative, stated that the display cases would enhance the north view from Palm Canyon and that they are necessary for a viable store. He stated that the cases could not be recessed any further because of meters in the mechanical room. Commissioner Olsen commented that he was not opposed to the display cases, but that the original theme should be kept intact, and that the cases should not extend out as far as they are proposed. M/S/C (Curtis/Neel ; Hough absent) approving the doors and windows and restudying the display cases. CASE 3.0275 (MINOR). Application by LA VIE EN ROSE for architectural approval of revisions to an existing storefront in the Vineyard retail complex on S. Palm Canyon Drive, C-B-D Zone, Section 15. (Ref. Case 2.960) Planner (Williams) explained that the former tenant was a jeweler and had a different display window design from what the applicant (clothing store) proposes. He stated that the application is for a straight glass storefront with changes to the planter, the trellis along the side of the center, and removal of the stucco wall and that the AAC recommended restudy because of the lack of excitement in the plan and also because the revision is not in keeping with the architecture of the center. Will Kleindienst, 121 S. Palm Canyon Drive, stated that the window size is very small and blocked by the trellis and by the adjacent restaurant awning, that the doors and window locations could be reversed if necessary, and the planters and the trellis left untouched. He stated that the window is not large enough to display clothing and that a third door is necessary for patrons to enter after they are attracted by the clothing in the window. He stated that the space is difficult to lease because of the lack of display space. Commissioner Olsen remarked that the bay window is a good element and should not be removed. August 12, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 5 CASE 3.0275 (Continued) Mr. Kleindienst stated that he could work with staff on embellishments, if necessary. Chairman explained that any changes have to be reviewed by the AAC. M/S/C (Whitney/Edgmon; Hough absent) for a restudy of the concept. SIGN APPLICATION. Application by CHIEF SIGN CO. for architectural approval of a main identification sign and revision to an existing sign program for the American Cleaners at 365 S. Indian, C-2 Zone (I.L. ), Section 14. Zoning Enforcement Officer stated that there had been legal problems regarding signing in the complex in the past, that the center has a series of black and white signs in the original sign program, and that the application by American Cleaners of a red, white and blue sign would be a deviation from the original sign program. He stated that Commission approval will change the sign program. Chairman commented that the existing program is not interesting, and that the proposed sign would be attractive. Commissioner Curtis agreed. Zoning Enforcement Officer explained that approval of the sign would allow four signs to be removed and replaced with the one sign, and that the sign will extend from beam-to-beam on the building. M/S/C (Curtis/Olsen; Hough absent) allowing a modification to the sign program and approving the sign, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the sign be centered on 3 beams. 2. That the sign extend to the beam end. PUBLIC HEARINGS CASE 5.0437-PD-187. Application by KAPTUR & CIOFFI for Motel 6, Inc. for a planned development district to allow construction of a 150 unit hotel on South Palm Canyon Drive between Camino Parocela/Sunny Dunes Road, C-2/R- 2/C-M Zones, Section 23. (Environmental Assessment; action. ) Planner (Williams) presented the application and stated that there are two significant environmental issues - sewer and traffic. She stated that the Planned Development District is in lieu of a change of zone because of the combination of three zoning districts which affect the density and setback and that the C-B-D General Plan designation allows development without a specified density since a proposal is reviewed in terms of open space and parking. She stated that the sewer study with mitigative measures has been accepted by the City Engineer, but that a traffic study has been submitted and found to be incomplete. She explained that a previous traffic study on the site indicated a need for the signalization of the intersection, that immediately north is a signal for ingress and egress to the Sun Center, and that southbound traffic entering this development would cause a traffic August 12, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 6 CASE 5.0437 - PD 187 (Continued) conflict. She explained that the applicant has submitted a concept, but that a firm design is required by the City because the original proposal was reviewed by the Traffic Engineer and showed side-to-side left turn lanes on Palm Canyon which would be in conflict with the multiple-driveway access points in the Sun Center. She stated that two options exist for the road alignment - using the existing signal lights and intersection and modifying the median island, or closing the existing driveways and creating a new driveway south of the existing approach. She stated that the proposal by the applicant would require changes to the Sun Center parking lot in terms of stacking and re-alignment of the parking spaces, that the environmental assessment has not been completed yet, because of the deficiencies of the traffic study, and that the applicant is working with the Redevelopment Agency because of the possibility of using Redevelopment funds in the redesign of the intersection, since impacts will be felt offsite. She explained that the AAC recommended approval of the site plan, subject to conditions, and the architecture was approved, although two members dissented - one feeling that minor changes should be made and the other feeling that the project is too massive. She stated that staff recommends continance because of the incomplete status of the environmental assessment, that the issue of blocking of the south elevation by the existing gas station was not discussed by the AAC, that the driveway design showed right-hand "in" and "out" turns only, that the AAC recommended additional landscaping on the southern elevation to break the long wall expanse. Traffic Engineer stated that closing Parocela would not be a problem as long as the hotel entryway is on the same alignment as Parocela. Chairman stated that staff is recommending that the stop light be in line with the one at the Sun Center. Commissioner Olsen asked if the development of the hotel would be an opportunity to straighten the now constricted right turn for northbound traffic. Traffic Engineer stated the it would help the sharp turn because of realignment of the curb. Planner explained that the AAC recommended shifting the project 10 feet to the west to buffer the residential area immediately to the east and the Edison sub-station to the south, and that one of the AAC concerns is that there is a large open space area in the front and the 10 feet would not affect the frontage. She stated that the servicing of the hotel is a problem, if the open space is spread throughout the site, and that CalTrans has approved the concept of a one-way curb cut, but has requested review of the final engineered design, that the main entrance would be through the new road alignment, and that the applicants will complete the other half of the street. Chairman declared the hearing open. Pete Fogarty, Santa Barbara, representing the applicant, requested approval ... of the site plan so that engineering could begin on the intersection since the City and the DOT both feel that the concept is viable and will eliminate an existing traffic problem. He stated that the staff recommendation to continue the application untflthe engineering is finished August 12, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 7 CASE 5.0437 - PD 187 (Continued) will be costly and that tentative approval will allow completion of the engineering work. James Cioffi , 700 Tahquitz Way, project architect, stated that CalTrans has approved the scaled overlay of the intersection, that the recommendation for continuance disappoints him, that the applicant has time constraints on the purchase of the property, that good coordination has been received from the Redevelopment Agency, that the traffic study is complete and that the sewer study has been accepted. He stated .that there is no problem moving the project 10 feet. Hugh Kaptur, 700 Tahquitz Way, part of the design team, stated that the proposal had been discussed with staff and feedback had indicated that a lower priced hotel would be of benefit to the City, that an upgraded design of the Motel 6 proven plan was discussed with staff, that there was a difference of opinion on the architecture among the AAC architects, that the project is designed for the client's needs, and that the design reduces the vertical mass and develops a horizontal appearance, that many weeks of work are involved, that the design makes the three-story structure appear to be two-story, and that he did not understand some of the concerns. He stated that his firm has been instrumental in establishing the architectural appearance of the City, and that he is pleased with the design. He requested that the condition on Chia, for a full walk from the curb to the property line, be eliminated to add landscaping. He also requested that the fire department condition for a 13-foot 6-inch high porte cochere be eliminated, since emergency access can be gained through the landscaped area of the project. He stated that the building could be �-' depressed 21-2 feet so that the grade would be at the window line in front with stepping between the buildings of approximately 18 inches with the parking lot in the back for drainage through the gutters. Rafael Shapiro, 691 S. Palm Canyon, stated that he was in favor of beautifying the area and expressed hope that the area's other neglected buildings would be revamped as well. There being no further appearances, Chairman closed the public hearing. Commissioner Olsen suggested that the developer pay for closing little used Chia to make the project larger. He stated that the Commission has had concerns before about open space and it is odd that one of the concerns on the project is that there is too much open space on the street frontage. Commissioner Edgmon stated that the project is well designed to reduce massing. Planning Director stated that the height of the porte cochere has not been discussed with the Fire Department, and that there is the ability to turnaround within 50 feet of the porte cochere. He stated that the topograph shows a 16-foot drop from corner-to-corner and that an 18-inch depression will help, but a significant design will have to be done in retaining walls and/or slopes. '�— Mr. Cioffi stated that the site would still drain well to the east corner, even with the 16-foot slope from corner-to-corner and is not as critical as it seems. August 12, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 8 CASE 5.0437 - PD 187 (Continued) Chairman stated that the building will occupy 40% of the land. Commissioner Whitney stated that she had dissented at the AAC and was trying to get direction on the massiveness. She inquired whether or not separate votes would be taken on the site plan and the architecture. She also stated that the site plan is acceptable, and that she had voted not to move the building. Planning Director stated that, if the major access is off Parocela, there is no problem in shifting the building but if the main access is on the south, the distance should be maximized to the porte cochere. He noted that the issue of moving the building forward is to enhance the appearance from the project of the neighboring residential area and to develop screening for the units facing east, since there is only 5 feet of landscaping before the parking area. He stated that, if the Commission acts to prepare a draft Negative Declaration, there is legally not enough time for publication for an adjourned meeting on August 26 and that the project would have to be continued to September 9. He stated that the final traffic report has not been received and that the Traffic Engineer feels there are solutions that are preferred over the recently submitted proposal . He stated also that, if a Negative Declaration is prepared, mitigative measures would have to be included. Traffic Engineer stated that the preferred design would be ingress and egress at Parocela with signalization, and that closing Parocela is not a big issue. Chairman stated that the architecture is well done, even though done within budget constraints, that there is a need for this type of hotel , and that alignment of Parocela with the Sun Center would solve problems with the intersection. He stated that there is not enough time legally for response to preparation of environmental documents for final approval . Commissioner Curtis stated that although the architecture is good, it is very massive on the site and the traffic alignment as proposed is the best that can be done. Commissioner Whitney stated that it was her understanding that the role of the lay person is to give a point of view. Planner stated that the driveway on the west side of Palm Canyon which would be offset to Parocela could be accepted, but that the best approach is to make the existing driveway more in alignment with Parocela. Chairman suggested that the alignment on the west side be resolved with the applicant, staff, and representatives of Sun Center, that the intersection be signalized, and that Parocela is the preferred ingress and egress. M/S/C (Curtis/Edgmon; Hough absent) ordering the preparation of a draft Negative Declaration and tentatively approving the site plan, subject to the following conditions: -- `.... 1. That landscape islands be added to the parking area on the south side per Zoning Ordinance standards. 2. That the building is not to be shifted. August 12, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 9 CASE 5.0437 - PD 187 (Continued) 3. That traffic problems are to be resolved with the configuration exiting the Sun Center parking lot onto Camino Parocela. 4. That the case be continued to September 9 for Commission response to the preparation of environmental documents. M/S/C (Curtis/Edgmon; Hough absent; Whitney dissented) approving the architecture as submitted. CASE 5.0448-CUP. Application by the LIBERACE FOUNDATION for a Conditional Use Permit to convert an existing residence into a museum at 226 West Alejo Road, between Belardo Road/Cahuilla, R-1-A Zone, Section 10. (Environmental Assessment; action. ) Recommendation: That the Commission order the filing of a Negative Declaration and get final approval to CUP 5.0448. Planner (Williams) presented the case at the board. She stated that the demand for tours is unknown, that there will be 15 people on each tour, that the applicants are discussing parking lot arrangements with the Redevelopment Agency, that the lot has 80 to 90 spaces and that with three persons per vehicle, only 25 spaces would be required for the museum use. She stated that concurrent use would not create a conflict, that the hours would be 9 to 5 or 10 to 5, seven days a week. She stated that, recently, four letters have been received in opposition to the proposal, citing traffic and intrusion of a commercial use into a residential neighborhood, and that two phone calls were received in opposition, and that support had come from the Desert Community Hotel Association via letter. Regarding Development Committee conditions, she stated that a condition to construct a sidewalk on Alejo Road could probably be eliminated, since the dedication would be a part of the landscaping in the public right-of-way and that red curbing would keep people from parking on the street and encroaching into the neighborhood. She stated that proceeds will benefit the Foundation for the Creative and Performing Arts. She explained that the parking would be on a City-owned lot to the east and that the handicap ramp or sidewalk can be deferred through a covenant. Chairman commented that a sidewalk or ramp would ruin the appearance of the house. Planning Director stated that the City parking lot could be upgraded on an interim basis, but in the longer term it may be incorporated with other properties in the area and upgraded using a new design. Planner stated that the hours of operation would conflict with the church's hours, but it is impossible to limit the hours of operation to offset those hours. Planning Director stated that none of the parking in question belongs to the church which has parking of its own on Belardo. August 12, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 10 CASE 5.0448 - CUP (Continued) Planner explained that ticket sales procedures have not been addressed because the popularity of the museum is not yet known and that the Police Department stated that there were no problems with crowds (except for the media) at the time Liberace died. She stated that conditions have been added to review the use as problems arise. 700 Tahquitz, representing the applicant, J. Cioffi/ stated that the requirements from Engineering will ruin the front of the house, that a letter from the Redevelopment Director states that 50 cents a ticket will be charged for use of the parking lot, that weekly operations will be from 10 to 5 and Sundays from 1 to 5, and that traffic will be regulated by red curbing. He stated that the parking lot will eliminate traffic penetration further west than Belardo, that tourist buses already travel through the neighborhood, and that there is a church and temple already in the neighborhood. He stated that there will be guided tours with groups of 15 people and no huge commercial venture is envisioned, that the physical appearance of the house will not change significantly, except for a few internal revisions for the handicapped, and that the City will have a directional sign at Belardo to keep traffic from going into the neighborhood. Rolf Arnhym, Manager of the Chamber of Commerce, 190 Amado, stated that the Chamber endorses the project as another prestigious attraction which will add an ambiance for the Palm Springs visitor, that there has been a large increase in visitors to the City and many of them ask what activities there are in Palm Springs, that the museum will enhance the image and bring much needed activity into the downtown, including retail sales, and that the museum will add tax dollars to the community and relieve the Palm Springs taxpayer. Ted Holmquist, owner of the Pepper Tree Inn and past president of the Desert Communities Hotel and Motel Association, stated that the organization supports and approves the conversion to a museum as a worthwhile enhancement to the tourism mix of the City. Joel Strote, 285 Beverly Drive, Beverly Hills, speaking on behalf of the Liberace Foundation, stated that the Foundation, which has been in existence for 10 years, owns the house and is a public non-profit organization which gives scholarships to talented musicians. He stated that the museum will add money to the scholarships for students in the creative and performing arts, that the Foundation board has not considered selling merchandise at the location, and that the main interest has been to have the house in as pristine a condition as possible. He stated that he did not know whether or not the board would address the issue of onsite merchandising in the future. Commissioner Whitney asked if the museum could exist somewhere else or if the contents and the house would be considered as a whole. Mr. Strote stated that the house is the key to the concept because the idea is to have Liberace's fans see how he lived, and that the house is essential to the concept. Mrs. Saralee Rudnick, 573 N. Cahuilla, voiced opposition stating that the neighborhood is not represented at the meeting since it is the middle of August and requested a continuance. She stated that there is a conflict of interest because the Planning Commissioners do not live in Las Palmas and August 12, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 11 CASE 5.0448 - CUP (Continued) are biased. She commented that the intrusion of a commercial venture into a neighborhood is not acceptable, that a neighboring resident (Mr. Guiterrez) and another neighbor (Bud Hoover) also joined in opposition to the project and that the Negative Declaration states that there are no negative impacts which is untrue. She stated that the area was a nightmare during the vigil before Liberace's death because of traffic until late at night. She commented that the parking lot is owned by the City and that any changes to it, if the museum is successful , will be opposed by the museum, that tour buses occupy several parking spaces, that if even a fourth of the 150,000 people who visit the Las Vegas Liberace museum come to the Palm Springs one, there would not be sufficient parking, and that police will have to be assigned because of the traffic. She stated that the rights of the commercial sector are overriding the rights of the residents and that, if a CUP is granted, a lawsuit would be started because property would be devalued which amounts to a "taking" and property owners may recover damages (pursuant to a recent court decision). Henry Frank, resident of Las Palmas, stated that during the time of Mr. Liberace's death, cars were parked everywhere even inside his property and a museum will cause the same problems. He stated that there will be noise and annoyance from buses unloading and sightseeing buses currently in the area; do not stop which is an advantage and that it would be a mistake to have a commercial project in an area of private homes. Cheryl Helm, 651 N. Belardo, 5 houses north of the Liberace home, voiced opposition, stating that development of a commercial project in a residential area is unacceptable because of the possible impact on the neighborhood, and that most residents are on vacation, and she requested continuance of Planning Commission recommendations to the Council until October, when the residents would be returning to Palm Springs. She stated that the museum would turn the Belair of Palm Springs into a carnival . Erishka Fairchild, 221 Merito, stated that she had not received a public hearing notice and wondered how many other residents had not been notified, that summer is a difficult time for proper representation because people leave the desert, that she had postponed a trip to Europe in order to appear at the meeting, that the area has expensive estate homes, that the parking for the museum is not onsite and turnaround is limited, that the City parking lot is used by the church, that the downtown area also uses the lot during the season, that the parking lot is unsightly with graffiti which will probably increase, that motorhomes will be parking in the area, and that property will be devalued. She stated that the area should be preserved as a Beverly Hills-type of area, that the downtown should not be brought into Las Palmas, that Mary Pickford' s home is not a museum, but is well-known, that the Graceland mansion has parking accommodations onsite, that the museum would create a hodge-podge of small businesses, that the residents want to keep the exclusivity, privacy, August 12, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 12 CASE 5.0448 - CUP. (Continued) peace and tranquility of the area, that oleanders on her property will provide shade for motorhomes, that her gardners will have to clean up trash and debris, and that there are numerous books on Liberace's homes for people who want to see how he lived. There being no further appearances, Chairman declared the hearing closed. Commissioner Olsen suggested that there be no on-street parking so that residents can use the streets for parking for dinner guests. He explained that the Getty Museum has a similar problem in relationship to a neighborhood except that it is not adjacent to a commercial area, and that parking reservations are made on-site. He asked if anyone had addressed upgrading of the parking lot. Planning Director stated that graffiti and weeds would be removed regardless of the status of the lot and the lot could be upgraded to meet current standards with striping and landscaping, but that there is a current proposal to raze and redesign the lot and incorporate it into another project. Commissioner Whitney stated that conditions for sufficient parking should be imposed on the parking lot in the beginning stages of the museum. Commissioner Olsen asked about the length of the CUP. Planning Director stated that there is no time frame currently, but that one could be developed. Commissioner Olsen stated that the City is dealing with an unknown with undefined problems. He stated that he sympathizes with the neighbors since he saw what happened during the vigil at the time of Mr. Liberace's death, but that the vigil situation could probably not be compared to the normal museum operation. He suggested a short term CUP to see if problems develop. August 12, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 13 CASE 5.0448 - CUP (Continued) Chairman suggested a trigger mechanism for review of the CUP at any time. Assistant City Attorney stated that the CUP is a flexible instrument, that any number of conditions can be imposed, and that the Commission could have a condition that would empower it to add conditions at a review. He stated that the City Manager could review the complaints. Chairman stated that he was concerned about the residents' problems and that when the complaints begin, the Commission should look at them on an agenda. Commissioner Olsen asked whether or not there was a mechanism to terminate the CUP if problems begin before a year. Planning Director stated that halving the figures of the Las Vegas Liberace museum would mean two tours per hour for the Palm Springs museum, that tour buses and tourists are in the area presently, that no new traffic will be created and some of the present traffic will be diverted. Mr. Strote stated that a program of reserved tickets will be in effect, but additional ticketing will be done to fill tours and that the regulations could be printed on the tickets and placed in brochures and advertising to tour companies. Chairman stated that no outside ventures would be allowed because they are prohibited by the Zoning Ordinance. Mrs. Rudnick questioned whether or not the case would be continued until Fall . Chairman stated that the Commission could grant the CUP, but staff would be in contact with complaints (through the City Manager's office). Assistant City Attorney stated that the City Manager, the Director of Community Development, the City Attorney, or the Planning Director could be recipients of the complaints. Planning Director stated that the Planning Division addresses matters such as this continually and sets agendas and public hearings and would be the likeliest office to receive the complaints. He stated that also the Police Department could keep the Planning Division informed on phone calls. He stated that the CUP would be scheduled for City Council . M/S/C (Olsen/Whitney; Hough, Curtis absent; Neel , Lapham dissented) ordering filing of a Negative Declaration and approving CUP 5.0448 based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: Findings 1. That the use, specifically the establishment of a museum for charitable purposes, is properly one for which a Conditional Use Permit is authorized by this Ordinance. 2. That the proposed museum use is desirable for the development of the community, is in harmony with the various elements or objectives of the General Plan through the development of a facility attractive to both tourists and residents, and should not be detrimental to August 12, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 14 CASE 5.0448 - CUP (Continued) existing uses specifically permitted in the zone in which the proposed use is to be located under the circumstances proposed and with the conditions set forth. 3. That the site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate said use, including yards, setbacks, walls landscaping and other features in order to adjust said use to those uses of land in the neighborhood. 4. That the site is served by two streets, Alejo Road, a collector road, and Belardo Road, which are properly designed and improved to carry the type and quantity of traffic to be generated by the proposed use. 5. That the conditions to be imposed and shown on the approved site plan are deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety and general welfare. 6. That the General Plan for the area shows the subject property in the fringe of a Resort Commercial designation adjacent to the downtown. 7. That the City of Palm Springs Redevelopment Agency owns the parking lot to the east across Belardo Road and has agreed to the use of the lot by the proposed museum. Conditions 1. That a copy of the lease agreement for parking be provided prior to occupancy. 2. That adequate parking be provided at all times for the use. 3. That the Planning Commission reserves the right to review the use on a complaint basis or upon change in the status or condition of the property, and add/modify the conditions. 4. That all Development Committee Conditions be met by the applicant. 5. That the Commission review the CUP and the effects of the operation 90 days after museum operations begin. Commissioner Curtis left the meeting during discussion on the Liberace museum. August 12, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 15 CASE 5.0447-CUP. Application by RON OLIPHANT for a conditional use permit for a dental office and professional building on Ramon Road between Avenida Caballeros/Calle Ricardo, R-2 Zone, Section 19. (Environmental assessment; action. ) Recommendation: That the Commission order the filing of the Negative Declaration and approve Case 5.0447-CUP, subject to conditions. Planner (Vankeeken) presented the case and stated that the applicant has requested that building not be flipped as requested by the ARC because the dentist offices would then overlook a wall and an apartment building. She stated that the roof was flat but she did not know its composition (pun unintended). Chairman declared the hearing open. Ron Oliphant, Box 552, Whitewater Drive, designer and agent for the applicants, stated that he would comply with the restudy recommendations of the AAC, except that flipping the building would create a hardship since it would take away the view and the floor plan would have to be redesigned. He stated that the doctor wants the proposed floor plan and that flipping would add landscaping but would ruin the symmetry of the building. He stated that roof is flat, is of composition material with a three-foot high parapet and that equipment would not be visible in the line-of-sight, but may have to be covered from the top and that the AAC recommended grouping the equipment. He stated that the ductwork is internal . There being no further appearances, Chairman declared the hearing closed. Planners stated that the one dissenting vote on the AAC objected to the architecture. Chairman and Commissioner Edgmon agreed. Commissioner Edgmon stated that the building resembles a twenty-year-old design that is not representative of the City today. M/S/C (Edgmon/Neel; Curtis, Hough absent) continuing the application to September 9 for a restudy of the architecture, noting the following: 1. That the buildings are to be flipped to create more landscaping at the southeast corner of the site. 2. That the trash enclosure be relocated to the southwest corner of the site. 3. That the garden wall on Calle de Ricardo be offset to create landscape vignettes. 4. Mechanical equipment on roof to be neat and better organized. Equipment to have down drafts, no exposed duct work. 5. Driveway entry to be patterned concrete. 6. Fascia to have screed lines or plane changes at the corners. 7. Window frames to be baked enamel to match colors proposed. August 12, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 16 CASE 5.0447-CUP (Continued) 8. Electric meters to face Calle de Ricardo. 9. Landscape concept (prelim) is approved. Note: The Commission took no action on the environmental assessment. CASE 6.357 VARIANCE (Ref. 3.0223). Application by JOHN WALLING for Robert Cheroske for a variance to reduce sideyard setbacks by two feet for a single family residence, and architectural approval for a garage addition at 575 N. Patencio Road, R-1-A Zone, Section 10. (This action is categorically exempt from Environmental Assessment per CEQA). and CASE 6.358-VARIANCE/CASE 3.0259. Application by LASZLO SANDOR for Harold Matzner for a variance to reduce sideyard setbacks to 7 feet for single family residence and architectural approval of a guest house addition at 555 Patencio Road, R-1-A ,Zone, Section 10. (This action is categorically exempt from Environmental Assessment per CEQA) . Recommendation: That the Commission approve Cases 6.357, 6.358, and 3.0259, subject to conditions. Planner (Green) stated that both projects are to be reviewed at the same, since they are adjacent properties and presented the cases at the display board. He stated that there was a letter in opposition regarding 6.358, but after staff review of the objections, it was determined that the complaints were of a civil nature, such as construction noise which can be addressed in the building permit process. He recommended approval of all cases, subject to conditions. He stated, regarding the guesthouse, that the grading for the sewer system should not cause hillside scaring, although the AAC recommended a restudy of that condition and that Variance 6.358 and 3.0259 were approved by the AAC. Chairman declared the hearing open for Cases 6.357 and 6.358. Case 6.357 - Variance John Walling, Indian Wells, project architect, stated that the intent of the design is to allow cars to manuever on the site and the building will be covering all but a few feet of the cut. He stated that a retaining wall was not approved by the AAC. Commissioner Neel suggested that the cut be treated with a masking chemical . August 12, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 17 CASE 6.357 & 6.358 (Continued) Mr. Walling stated that the chemical would return the rock to its original color and that alcoves filled with indigenous plants could also be used. He stated that the building hides the cut, except for approximately three feet. There being no further appearances, the hearings for Case 3.657 was closed. Case :6.358/ 3.0259 Laszlo Sandor, Indian Wells, project architect, stated that extension of the driveway is necessary for vehicle maneuvering and for a turnaround and that tucking a guesthouse underneath solves two problems. There being no further appearances, Chairman declared the hearing closed for Case 6.358. /Whitney dissented; M/S/C (Neel/Olsen; Curtis, Hough absent) approving Case 6.357 based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: Findings 1. Because of the special circumstances applicable to the subject property, namely steeply sloping terrain and limited building pad area, the strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would �-� deprive the subject property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity or under identical zone classification. 2. The variance is subject to conditions which assure that the approval does not constitute the grant of a special privilege inconsistent with limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and zone. 3. The granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public, health, safety, convenience, or welfare or injurious to property in the same vicinity and zone. 4. The granting of the variance will not adversely affect the General Plan for the City. Conditions 1. That the structure shall be subject to architectural review. 2. That details of the location and screening of mechanical equip- ment shall be submitted. 3. That a detailed grading plan shall be submitted. 4. That all recommendations of the Development Committee be met. and August 12, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 18 CASE 6.357 & 6.358 (Continued) Approving Case 6.358 and 3.0259 based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: Findings 1. Because of the special circumstances applicable to the subject property, namely steeply sloping terrain and limited building pad area, the strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would deprive the subject property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity or under identical zone classifi- cation. 2. The variance is subject to conditions which assure that the approval does not constitute the grant of a special privilege inconsistent with limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and zone. 3. The granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public, health, safety, convenience, or welfare or injurious to property in the same vicinity and zone. 4. The granting of the variance will not adversely affect the General Plan for the City. Conditions 1. That the structure shall be subject to architectural review. 2. That details of the location and screening of mechanical equip- ment shall be submitted. 3. That a detailed grading plan shall be submitted. 4. That all recommendations of the Development Committee be met. PUBLIC COMMENTS - Three Minute Time Limit. None. ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL ITEMS Approval of architectural cases is valid for two years. The approval granted must be exercised within that time period unless extended. CASE 3.0010 (CONTINUED). Application by WESSMAN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY for architectural approval of revised detailed grading plan and final landscape plans for 104-unit apartment complex (Case Del Sol) at Belardo Road/Morongo Road intersection, R-3 Zone (I .L. ) , Section 22. Planner (Green) stated that the grading plan has been revised per staff recommendations and that there is a six-foot wall on Belardo, but that two feet area retaining wall , lessening the slope from the base of the August 12, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 19 CASE 3.0010 (Continued) wall to the street and making the condition less harsh. He stated that the landscaping meets requirements and that the City Engineer is not requiring the sidewalk because there is one on the other side of the street. Commissioner Olsen commented that when Belardo is extended there will be a sidewalk across the street, but none by the project. Planner stated that the situation would have to be resolved with the City Engineer at that time. Commissioner Whitney stated that she was asked by one of the AAC members to add a condition for trees to be added in the parking lot on the south side of the carports. Planner stated that the concern was that there was a stretch of wall without trees. Discussion ensued on whether or not the trees could grow in a small area. Chairman stated that the tree pattern should continue along the wall . John Wessman, 72200 Clancy Lane, the developer, stated that trees were not planted because of the wall footings which extend 30 inches and that the roof overhang for the carports also encroach into the planters. Planning Director stated that there is approximately seven feet of clear area. Chairman stated that there was enough room. Mr. Wessman noted that the trees will not live, but that possibly he could plant eucalyptus. Discussion continued. Planning Director stated that staff would work with the developer and perhaps change the other trees. Mr. Wessman requested that colored stamped pavement not be a condition for the secondary entry. Chairman stated that there was a large amount of paving at that entry. Mr. Wessman explained that the second entry does notline up with the stamped entry of Ralph's shopping center and that the entry is for residents only, has no guest parking and should be de-emphasized. He stated that the reason for not having the sidewalk is the main Belardo access is on Highway 111 and that the access road is a secondary one. M/S/C (Neel/Edgmon; Curtis, Hough absent) approving the application, subject to the following conditions: 1. That all the recommendations of the Development Committee be met. 2. That three Jacaranda trees be placed along the long wall elevation or the tree species changed so that all are the same in the tree scheme for the project. 3. That no textured paving be added to the second entrance. August 12, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 20 CASE 3.0010 (Continued) 4. That vines be espaliered to the Belardo Road wall elevation. 5. That bougainvillea be added to the rock slope (with staff approval) . CASE 3.960 SIGN APPLICATION. Application by BANK OF AMERICA for architectural approval of revisions to adopted sign program within the Palm Springs Mall on the southwest corner of Tahquitz-McCallum Way Way/Farrell Drive, CSC Zone, Section 13. Planner (Williams) stated that in the approved sign program only major tenants were to be identified and that the Bank of America was not a major tenant at that time, that the sign would be relocated above one of the inset panels above the glass block area which is not part of the Bank's frontage and would contain 17 square feet with navy blue channel letters, internally lit with a red logo and on a white background. She stated that the sign program for the complex is rust colored letters with the can painted the same color as the walls (peach), and that the AAC felt that it was in conflict and could not determine whether or not the bank was a major tenant and that the Committee did not take action and left the decision to the Commission. She stated that, if the sign is approved, other tenants on the north corridor may apply for signs above the glass block, even though only major tenants are allowed signs. She stated that the Bank of America has 19 feet of frontage. Chairman stated that the Commission makes the determination of the sign program and can develop criteria for major tenant signing, that Thrifty's, Von' s, Millers, K-Mart, and Camelot were identified as major tenants and because of eliminating the other signs, the Planning Commission granted two monument signs (which has not been encouraged in other locations) for better identification of the mall on Tahquitz and on Farrell and it includes major tenants who do not have frontage on that street. He stated that, if the sign is approved, it should go on the back wall, not on the frontage, because of its precedence setting nature and that a major tenant is defined in the Ordinance as 40,000 to 60,000 square feet and that the Bank of America has 10,000. Jean Pitts, Christian and Bouchard, architects, 1000 S. Palm Canyon, requested that the Bank of America be considered as a major tenant since it occupies 10,000 square feet. She stated that the bank ;lost frontage in -the remodel and is not easily seen, that the bank will sacrifice the red logo and keep the blue and white coloration, that the Versateller does not serve as signage from the street, that the bank sign has been reduced from 50 square feet to 17 square feet which is a major change. She requested consideration of the request, since other tenants on the north wall do not have 10,000 square feet of floor space as does the bank. Chairman stated that the bank is not a convenience, but a necessity, but the sign program at the mall does not include blue and white and the bank is not considered a major tenant because of the floor space which is under 60,000 square feet. August 12, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 21 CASE 3.960 (Continued) Planning Director stated that the bank has no frontage where the sign is proposed and that, if the Commission wishes, a program could be developed to include all stores in the mall , but that there is much flexibility in the program presently and the Commission should be aware of precedence setting. He stated that the mall program has rust letters with alternate colors and the cans painted the same color as the background and that legally not every deviation from the sign program sets a precedent, but from a pressure standpoint, deviations are difficult. He suggested working with the applicant on signage after Commissioner Edgmon asked about the possibility of a logo rather than a sign. Chairman reiterated that customers should able to identify the business. M/S/C (Olsen/Neel ; Curtis, Hough absent) for a restudy with staff of the Bank of America application and with direction that there should not be proliferation of signs on the facade of the mall. CASE 3.0220 (MINOR). Application by CARLS JR. for architectural approval of revisions to the exterior of Carls Jr. Restaurant at 252 N. Palm Canyon Drive, PD-136A, Section 3. Planner (Williams) stated that the restaurant wants nighttime visibility and identification and is proposing a backlit awning, using fluorscent fixtures under the soffit, painting window frames red and changing entry doors to part wood painted beige and part glass. She stated that the AAC recommended that the windows and doors be approved and the awnings and light restudied and that when the project was approved originally there was controversy about a drive-through in the City and the restaurant was to have a low-key appearance, although the applicants now want more visibility. Carl L. Karcher, 2520 Palm Canyon Drive, franchise operator, stated that he had not been part of all preliminary details and approvals, that the proposal is a system-wide plan, that the building needs more visibility at night, that the shopping center owner agreed with the changes and feels it will be an enhancement to the center and that the awning will not detract from the existing architecture of the building. Planner stated that the AAC recommended using lighting in the landscaping and redesigning landscaping and lighting to wash the building and that the shopping center owner approved the Carl 's, Jr. concept. Chairman stated that the awning is a sign program and would set a precedent. He stated that the awnings are not canvas and obviously are to light up the building to a bright yellow and are attention getting. Mr. Karcher stated that the proposal would be done in good taste. M/S/C (Olsen/Edgmon; Whitney, Lapham dissented; Curtis, Hough absent) denying the lights, windows and doors. August 12, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 22 CASE 3.0220 (Continued) Chairman stated that the applicant can resubmit another awning design, but it would have to be reviewed by the AAC. CASE 3.0263 (MINOR). Application by SIERRA ENERGY SYSTEMS for architectural approval of revisions to mechanical equipment structure for the Plaza Resort at 2601 Golf Club Drive, R-3 Zone, Section 29. M/S/C (Neel/Edgmon; Curtis, Hough absent) continuing the application to September 9 at the request of the applicant. CASE 3.752. Application by the CITY OF PALM SPRINGS and John Wessman for architectural approval of remodel of the McCallum Civic Center Building, Welwood Murray Library Building, and various existing commercial buildings at the southeast corner of Tahquitz-McCallum Way, between Indian Avenue/S. Palm Canyon Drive, C-B-D Zone, Section 15. Planning Director stated that the application is an expansion of a previously approved proposal which expands further south on Indian Avenue to include the Pitts building, the Plaza Theatre, Louise's Pantry, the Willard property and the City Library and that the City Council has approved the project in concept and has approved the sale of the Library to the applicant, but that the proposal will not bind other properties not under the application until they are acquired or until a specific plan is heard through a public hearing. He stated that the size of windows will be changed and a different entry will be developed for the library and that a letter had been received from Jeremy Crocker, a local resident, who is concerned that the applicant is not the owner of the library, although Council has agreed to allow staff to work with Mr. Wessman to buy it and that the building is a Class 7 historic site which will have multiple changes to the exterior. He stated that Mr. Crocker feels that any approval would conflict with the Historic Site Preservation Board (HSPB) ordinance. Planning Director stated that the Council can approve changes to Class 7 historic sites. He stated that final Development Committee minutes have not been completed by the Engineering Division, that the proposed tower element will require a Planned Development District, and architectural review of other details. He stated that landscaping and signing plans will be reviewed and that the library use issue should not be considered by the Commission. He explained that the AAC voted to approve the proposal with two dissenters who objected to the changes in the library' s exterior and who felt that the changes were not in the best architectural interests of the project or the City, although they liked the overall project. He noted that he attended the HSPB meeting and the board will be recommending to the City Council denial of any architectural changes to the building with the exception of removal and restoration of those parts of the building added through the years. He stated that the architect for Mr. Wessman is adamant about revising the library exterior to pick up the stone work of the windows and slurry coating the concrete as proposed in the rest of the complex and to redefine the entry with a larger more significant element. He stated that the changes were in order to give more window display area fronting on Palm Canyon and Tahquitz for retailers. He stated that there will additional architectural cases brought before the Commission on property not under the applicant's control. August 12, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 23 CASE 3.752 (Continued) Chairman stated that the revisions made by the architect are excellent, that the project is a Council project, and the Council should decide about the changes to the Library. Commissioner Whitney suggested that the Commission give a recommendation and stated that the project is beautiful, but that the library exterior should remain as it is, an historic building. John Wessman, 72200 Clancy Lane, Rancho Mirage, the applicant, stated that he had taken much "flack" over the project, that he had tried to design a good project, that the Commission should deny it, if the Commission does not like it and let the Council decide its future. He stated that he would not build the project if the Council did not approve it as designed. Commissioner Olsen stated that the project is beautiful , but not every part of the library should not be covered with stucco because there are not very many Class 7 historic sites in the City. Planning Director reminded the Commission that the issue of use is not in the Commission purview. M/S/C (Whitney/Neel; Curtis, Hough absent; Edgmon, Olsen, Lapham dissenting) to approve the project and to leave the library exterior in its present state. The motion was defeated. o.. Motion was made by Edgmon to approve the project, subject to AAC recommendations. The motion died for lack of a second. Commissioner Olsen asked if the Commission could approve the project, subject to AAC conditions, but take issue with the complete obliteration of the library. Redevelopment Director explained that the HSPB addressed the issue of the change of a Class 7 historic site, that the AAC reviewed the remodel of the library as a design issue, that the Planning Commission evidently like the project, except for the exterior changes to the library and that the issue is the remodel. Chairman stated that the AAC should be upheld and that the Council should be the body to determine the final result. M/S/C (Edgmon/Olsen; Curtis, Hough absent; Whitney abstained) approving the project, including remodeling of the library exterior, subject to the following conditions: 1. That detailed landscape, irrigation, exterior lighting plans be submitted. 2. That a detailed sign program be submitted and approved. 3. That all recommendations of the Development Committee be met. August 12, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 24 CASE 3.0266 (MINOR) . Initiation by the CITY OF PALM SPRINGS and the Golden Anniversary Committee for architectural approval of revisions to the Village Green complex, proposed by the Lasting Gift Committee, S. Palm .. Canyon Drive, C-B-D Zone, Section 15. Planning Director stated that a Lasting Gift Committee was formed as part of the 50th Anniversary celebration and after discussion of appropriate gift such as a sculpture, new sidewalks, overview walk up to the hillsides of the City , the Committee finally decided to revamp the Village Green because it has historic buildings, and open space and is in need of attention, and that the concept is displayed on the board. He stated that the design removes the two walks that split the area to create a larger green space and a fountain will be designed with personalized tiles or bricks as part of the groundscape and as a major focus of the sidewalk. He stated that the curb will be pushed out on Palm Canyon and parking eliminated to form a seating area and that the design will be completed before the kickoff ceremonies in December. M/S/C (Neel/Edgmon; Curtis, Hough absent) approving the application, subject to the following condition: That final detailed landscape plans for the fountain, landscaping and paving be submitted and approved. TTM 18087. Application by KWL ASSOCIATES for Andreas Hills Inc. for a twelve month time extension for a tract map on for subdivision of property for lot sales, on Bogert Trail, W-R-1B Zone, Sections 35/36. M/S/C (Neel/Olsen; Curtis, Hough absent) approving a second 12-month time extension for TTM 18087, subject to all original conditions of approval . The new expiration date will be September 6, 1988. CASE 20.102. Initiation by RIVERSIDE COUNTY for review of Plot Plan 9735 to allow a mobilehome and RV sales lot for property located on Garnet Road, west of N. Indian Avenue, Sphere-of-Influence. Planning Director stated that there is poorly designed project in the County in which the City has appealed the plot plan to the Board of Supervisors who have not yet responded and on the property, presently, there is an RV sales lot with a chain-link fence and gravel to which the City is opposed. M/S/C (Neel/Edgmon; Curtis, Hough absent) for a restudy of the application, noting the following: RV Sales Lot 1. That a comprehensive landscape and wall plan be developed - tying in with TPM 21921 - for the Interstate 10 frontage. 2. That onsite parking and walks be paved and that gravel be limited to RV display areas. August 12, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 25 CASE 20.102 (Continued) 3. That landscape be upgraded on the west, east and south sides. Onsite landscaping should be added adjacent to buildings, parking and other areas to buffer this development. 4. That chain-link fencing be prohibited and that wrought iron and walls be used. 5. That an overall sign program for TPM 21921 be approved and that billboards be prohibited. 6. That revised plans be submitted to the City prior to approval . CASE 3.0260. Application by LASZLO SANDOR for Harold Matzner for architectural approval of single-family hillside residence on Crescent Drive/Patencio Road, R-1-A Zone, Section 10. Planner (Green) presented the case and gave AAC recommendations. Planning Director explained that a letter was not sent to the adjoining property owners, that staff felt there were no impacts, since most of the properties are above or across the street and that not sending the letter was an oversight by staff. Chairman stated that the no letter should be sent if there are no view obstructions. M/S/C (Neel/Olsen; Curtis, Hough absent) approving the application as submitted, subject to recommendations of the Development Committee. CASE 3.0213 (MINOR). Application by CAFE ST. JAMES for architectural approval of installation of screen to cover coolers on the roof of restaurant at 254 N. Palm Canyon Drive, C-B-D Zone, Section 15. Planner (Williams) stated that the applicant wants an alternate design approved ,and ithatthe AAC recommended relocation of the motor and that equipment be kept within the four-foot height limit or the parapet raised to 52 feet. Planning Director stated that the screening is necessary because a hotel overlooks the roof, although the ordinance was not in effect at the time the project was submitted and that screening of roof mechanical equipment for restaurants is a problem in the City. He stated that the Gatsby Restaurant equipment is screened from above by condition. M/S/C (Edgmon/Olsen; Curtis, Hough absent) approving the application, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the equipment be redesigned to be concealed by the parapet. If not possible, parapet to be raised to 52 (five-and-one-half) feet in height. August 12, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 26 CASE 3.0213 (Continued) 2. Transition to the rear roof element to be reviewed by staff if the higher parapet is used. 3. That the equipment be screened from view from the top. CASE 3.0245 (MINOR) . Application by RICHARD FISCHER for architectural approval of working drawings for balcony additions to the Spa Hotel , 100 N. Indian Avenue, C-1-AA Zone (I.L. ), Section 14. Planning Director stated that the design will replace the plywood dividers on the balconies. M/S/C (Edgmon/Neel; Curtis, Hough absent) approving the application as submitted. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS (Continued) CASE 20.106. Request by RIVERSIDE COUNTY for review of change of zone from "Wind Energy" to "Controlled Development" for property located east of West Palm Springs Village, and north of I-10 (Sphere-of-Influence). Planning Director stated that the change of zone is part of a program to remove wind turbines in the area and staff supports it. M/S/C (Edgmon/Neel; Curtis, Hough absent) recommending to the County that a change of zone from Wind Energy (W-E) to Controlled Development be approved on the subject property. CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS. Update of City Council actions. - Annexation of Land North of the City of Palm Springs. Planning Director stated that the Council has shown interest in annexing land outside the City, but it is difficult to justify economically because of inability to deliver services to the area such as fire and police service. Chairman stated that services could be contracted to the County and that, unless the City annexes the area, the entire entrance to the City will be blighted because of lack of County development standards. COMMISSION/STAFF REPORTS OR REQUESTS. - Planning Commission Study Session. Regularly scheduled study session will be held on August 19 from 3 to 5 p.m. in the Large Conference Room, City Hall . Planning Commission Meeting of August 26. This meeting has been cancelled due to lack of a quorum. August 12, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 27 ADDED STARTERS. (Determination of eligibility for consideration.) None. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to discuss, Chairman adjourned the meeting at 6:15 p.m. PLARWG DrRECTOR MDR/ml WP/PC MIN PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Council Chamber, City Hall September 23, 1987 1:30 p.m. ROLL CALL F-Y 1987 - 1988 Present Present Excused Absences Planning Commission This Meeting to Date to date Larry Lapham, Chairman X 5 0 Hugh Curtis X 5 0 Martha Edgmon X 4 1 Brent Hough X 4 1 Earl Neel X 4 1 Gary Olsen X 5 0 Barbara Whitney X 4 1 Staff Present Marvin D. Roos, Planning Director Siegfried Siefkes, Assistant City Attorney Robert Green, Planner Margo Williams, Planner John Terell , Redevelopment Planner Jerry Gonzalez, Traffic Engineer Bill Hudak, Zoning Enforcement Officer Mary E. Lawler, Recording Secretary Architectural Advisory Committee - September 21, 1987 • Chris Mills, Chairman Absent: Mike Buccino Tom Doczi Martha Edgmon, Alternate Brent Hough William Johnson Will Kleindienst Gary Olsen Barbara Whitney Chairman called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. M/S/C (Olsen/Hough) approving minutes of September 9, 1987 as submitted. ADMINISTRATIVE NOTE: Vice Chairman Curtis presided.