Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1987/07/22 - MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Council Chamber, City Hall July 22, 1987 1:30 p.m. ROLL CALL F-Y 1987 - 1988 Present Present Excused Absences Planning Commission This Meeting to Date to date Larry Lapham, Chairman X 2 0 Hugh Curtis X 2 0 Martha Edgmon - 1 1 Brent Hough X 2 0 Earl Neel X 2 0 Gary Olsen X 2 0 Barbara Whitney X 2 0 Staff Present Marvin o(�os, Planning Director Siegfried Siefkes, Assistant City Attorney Fred Hawkins, Director of Parks, Recreation and Library Douglas Evans, Planner Robert Green, Planner Richard Patenaude, Planner Margo Williams, Planner Carol Vankeeken, Planner Mary E. Lawler, Recording Secretary Architectural Advisory Committee - July 20, 1987 Chris Mills, Chairman Absent: Martha Edgmon Mike Buccino Barbara Whitney Tom Doczi Gary Olsen Brent Hough William Johnson Will Kleindienst Chairman called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. M/S/C (Curtis/Neel ; Edgmon absent) approving minutes of July 8, 1987 as submitted. There were no Tribal Council comments. `�r r July 22, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 2 CONSENT ACTION AGENDA Approval of architectural cases is valid for two years. The approval granted must be exercised within that time period unless extended. M/S/C (Curtis/Hough; Edgmon absent) taking the following actions: CASE 3.947 (CONTINUED) . Application by METROPOLITAN THEATERS for architectural approval o revisions to the sign program for a 6-plex motion picture theater at 789 E. Tahquitz Way between Calle Alvarado/Calle EL Segundo, C- 1-AA Zone Section 1.4. (Ref. Case 3.309. ) Approved, subject to the following condition: 1. That courses of block in the planter on the west side of the building be removed. 2. That the poster cases be pegged or pinned so that they float free from the masonry. 3. That some landscaping be retained in the planter in the form of ground cover. 4. Details to be reviewed at the staff level , including cross-sections of the pinning of the poster cases. 5. That the poster cases on the south elevation also be pinned or pegged in a manner similar to those on the west side. CASE 3.0191. Application by GREAT AMERICAN STORAGE for architectural approval of la ape ape plans for office/warehouse project on Farrell Drive/Research Drive, M-1-P Zone, Section 12. Approved, subject to the following conditions: 1. That trees be substituted for shrubs on the north, south and east exterior elevations of the mini-storage building. Groups of trees shall be used. Mesquite, Eucalyptus and Bottle trees are suggested. 2. That Rosemary, Lantana and Star Jasmine be minimum one gallon size. 3. That palms be added to the Farrell and Research Drive elevations (Washingtonia Robusta and Filifera) . 4. That olives be minimum 36" - 48" box size. 5. That bottle trees be minimum 30" box size. 6. That hose bibs be added to the exterior of the mini-storage buildings for watering of trees. July 22, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 3 CASE 3.0250 _ (MINOR) . Application by LEE SOBLE for architecural approval of revisions IF—approved landscape plan for commercial building at 1301. N. Palm Canyon Drive, C-1 Zone, Section 10. Approved, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the trees located at the back or northerly part of the parking lot be replaced and additional trees added to the finger planter and on the east side of the parking area: 2. That trees be as per the original approved plans for species and size. CASE 3.0254 (MINOR) . Application by TOPA THRIFT AND LOAN for architectural approval of exterior revisions to front of building at 886 N. Palm Canyon Drive, C-1 Zone, Section 11. Planning Director stated that Topa, without approval , changed exterior material on one-half of the building to wood and that both halves are to match using wood. Approved, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the remainder of the building be painted the same color to match the "Toga" space. 2. That the doors and windows on the adjacent tenant space be changed to match the "Tops" revisions. CASE 3.0261 (MINOR) , Application by DOOR KING for architectural approval of new entry gates, revised guard house roof color, and sign color for Canyon Heights Condominium project at South Palm Canyon Drive/Murray Canyon Drive, R-1-A Zone (IL) , Section 34. (Reference Case 5.0032-PD-78. ) Restudy of new entry gates; denial of the proposed color change to the copper guard house roof and sign (to be returned to their natural weathered color) . ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL ITEMS Approval of architectural cases is valid for two years. The approval granted must be exercised within that time period unless extended. CASE 3.0197 (MINOR) . Application by DESERT HOSPITAL for architectural approval of revised pans for waiting area for intensive care and surgical units at 1150 N. Indian Avenue, R-4 Zone, Section 11. Planner (Patenaude) presented the case. July 22, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 4 CASE 3.0197 (MINOR) (Continued) (M/S/C Neel/Hough; Edgmon absent) approving the application, subject to the following condition: That all recommendations of the Development Committee be implemented. Note: The landscaping was restudied. CASE 3.0236. Application by MICHAEL PIO for architectural approval of warehouse/office complex on Valdivia Way between Tachevah Drive/La .Campana, M-1-P Zone, Section 7. Planner (Green) stated that the AAC recommended restudy because the design is not of high enough quality for the area. (M/S/C Curtis/Olsen; Edgmon absent; Hough dissented) for a restudy of the application, noting the following: 1. That the design is completely unacceptable and not of the quality to be maintained in the area. 2. That components in the elevation should be uniform in the front and side elevations. 3. That the design of the side elevation (garage doors and window/door panels) shall be revised. 4. That the building appears to be featureless with no articulation in the elevation or roof line. 5. That trees should be added against the building on the north and south sides. CASE 3.0251 (MINOR). Application by WILLIAM KLIENDIENST for architectural approval of remodel and addition to single-family residence at 690 Stevens Road, R-1-A Zone, Section 10. (M/S/C Whitney/Curtis; Edgmon absent) tabling the application. CASE 5.0421-PD-185-B. Application by DESERT HOSPITAL CORPORATION for arch!tec ura approval of elevations and site plan for El Mirador Medical Offices and tower building, 1150 N. Indian Avenue, R-4 Zone, Section 11. (Architectural approval only. ) Planner (Patenaude) presented the case and stated that revised plans were submitted and include added detailing, especially in the new extension; that the AAC was pl eased with the project and recommended approval , subject July 22, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 5 CASE 5.0421-PD-185-B. (Continued) to returning with studies of detailing in the four-story area on the side of the new entryway to reduce the scale; and that plans are the same scale and massing as the Commission previously reviewed. Commissioner Hough stated that the building appears large in the back and detailing will be added to reduce the rear mass. Planner explained that the reason the area is not emphasized is that the applicants did not want to call attention to the back; that the finish will be sand-colored stucco, that the approval would be for the architecture only with the use to be determined when the Planned Development District application is reviewed later; and that a color board will be presented at the time the PD application is heard. (M/S/C Hough/Olsen; Edgmon absent) approving the architecture, subject to the following conditions: 1. Architectural details and/or landscaping to mitigate the overwhelming scale - especially at the east end of the new structure, but also along the north elevation of the same. 2. Methods to highlight the main entryway on the north elevation. 3. Fenestration of smaller windows in new structure to more closely match the height/width ratio of the windows of the E1 Mirador building. �.. 4. Preliminary landscape plans. NOTE: The parking layout and landscaping are restudied. CASE 3.0263 (MINOR) . Application by MARK LONN for Plaza Resort and Spa for arch!tec ura approval of revisions to a mechanical equipment structure for hotel at 2601 Golf Club Drive, R-3 Zone, Section 29 (ref. cases 2.540 and 2.573) . (M/S/C Whitney/Curtis; Edgmon absent) for a restudy, noting the following: That more detailed development plans are to be submitted, specifically the wall/fence detail , landscape plans, and mechanical equipment specifications and details. Planner (Evans) stated that the applicant is redesigning the application taking into consideration the AAC recommendations. July 22, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 6 PUBLIC HEARINGS TTM 20603. Application by SURESH DODDIAH for Beulah Raehn for a Tentative Tract Map to allow a subdivision of 56 lots located north of Acanto Drive, east of S. Palm Canyon Drive, W-R-1-B Zone, Section 35. (Commission response to written comments on Draft Negative Declaration; final approval . No comments received. ) Recommendation: That the Commission order the filing of a Negative Declaration and give final approval , subject to conditions. Planner (Williams) stated that the map was approved previously, expired, and was refiled; and that the energy deficiencies noted in the original findings have now been corrected and the lots and homes will be oriented to to save energy; that staff recommends that the Commission direct staff to meet with the County to discuss the possibility of public access instead of half private and half City/County streets; and that the AAC recommended approval , subject to the map meeting City standards prior to final map approval . Planning Director recommended that architectural approval be required for all the lots since new tracts include the condition, and that there had been aesthetic problems with tracts that did not have the requirement. Chairman declared the hearing open. Suresh Doddiah of San Bernardino, project architect, stated that he had just become aware that Acanto was a half private and half public street, �. but that the problems can be resolved. He stated that he accepted the recommended conditions. There being no further appearances, the hearing was closed. Planning Director stated that the CC&Rs for the map will be reviewed for property maintenance standards for the private road, but that no special development standards are proposed or the application would be a Planned Development District, but that each lot will require architectural approval and that the R-1-B zoning requires a minimum residential size of 1500 sq. ft. plus garage. Planner explained that the lot sizes range from 1.5,000 sq. ft. to approximately 20,000 sq. ft. M/S/C (Curtis/Neel ; Edgmon absent) ordering the filing of a Negative Declaration and approving TTM 20603 based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: FINDINGS: 1. That the site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the pro- posed subdivision. 2. That the proposed subdivision is consistent with the Zoning Ordinance �,, and General Plan. July 22, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 7 TTM 20603.° "('Continued) 3. That the site is adequate physically for the type of development and density of development. 4. That the proposed subdivision is not likely to result in any adverse environmental impacts. CONDITIONS 1. That the conditions of the Development Committee dated June 24, 1987, shall apply. 2. That houses on all lots receive architectural approval . 3. That the following mitigative measures be implemented: a. That automatic sprinkler systems be required for all structures. b. That if during site development, any indications of cultural artifacts are discovered construction will be stopped and a qualified archaeologist called to analyze the finds. 4. That CC & Rs be submitted for City approval prior to filing of final map which demonstrate common area and street frontage maintenance. CASE 5.0445-CUP. Application by VICKI GORD/DESERT SONSHINE PRE-SCHOOL for a on itional Use Permit to allow a pre-school facility on Via Negocio between Sunrise Way/Vista Chino, C-1 Zone, Section 1. (This action is categorically exempt from Environmental Assessment per CEQA guidelines. ) Recommendation: That the Commission give final approval to CUP 5.0445. Planner (Williams) stated that the application is for a pre-school in the old PennySaver building on Via Negocio, that the school will be for three- year-olds, that the landscaping has been revised per AAC recommendations, but not seen by the AAC; that there is a need for the application to be approved as soon as possible because of state licensing procedures, and that the redesigned landscape plans adds three Ash trees to the playground; and that the applicants are requesting deferrment of sidewalks. Chairman declared the hearing open. Vicki Gord, 2002 Whitewater Club Drive, the applicant, explained that the school is a non-profit Christian pre-school and has been in existence on Sunrise Way for three years; that there is a long waiting list and a need for additional space; that the leased building will house 35 three-year- olds; that there are stringent State licensing procedures; that approval is needed for construction of the playground; that 75% of the waiting list is three-year-olds; and that the present building will be for four and five- year-olds with the new playground reserved for three-year-olds. July 22, 1.987 PC MINUTES Page 8 CASE 5.0445 4UP' (Continued) Planner (Williams) stated that there was one letter in opposition from an adjacent property owner who stated that the area is not suitable for children. Chairman commented that there was already a pre-school in the area. There being no further appearances, Chairman declared the hearing closed. Chairman stated that he had no problem with deferring installation of sidewalks until foot traffic requires it and asked whether or not the revised landscape and fence plan meet the recommendations of the AAC. Planner stated that there was no objection to the proposed wood fence and that the AAC only wanted to see the details. Commissioner Curtis stated that he had no concerns with the deferrment of the sidewalk since the area is underdeveloped; and that with fencing behind the building and landscaping, there should be no problems. Commissioner Hough stated that he felt deferring sidewalks until foot traffic warrants it is a very undefined condition. Chairman explained that the condition is suitable and that the sidewalks will be installed when the area is more developed for pedestrian traffic. M/S/C (Curtis/Hough; Edgmon absent) approving CUP 5.0445 based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: FINDINGS 1. That the use applied for is properly one for which a Conditional Use Permit is authorized by this Ordinance. 2. That the said use is desirable for the development of the community, is in harmony with the various elements or objectives of the General Plan, and is not detrimental to existing uses or to future uses specifically permitted in the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. 3. That the site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate said use, including yards, setbacks, walls or fences, landscaping. 4. That the site for the proposed use relates to streets and highways properly designed and improved to carry the type and quantity of traffic to be generated by the proposed use. 5. That the conditions to be imposed and shown on the approved site plan are deemed necessary to protect the public welfare. CONDITIONS .,, 1. That all recommendations of the Development Committee shall be met with the exception that sidewalks will be deferred until foot traffic warrants them. July 22, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 9 CASE 5.0445-CUP (Continued) 2. That the Planning Commission reserves the right to review this operation in the future, if complaints arise and add/or alter the conditions of approval . 3. That the revised fence and landscape plan submitted for Commission review on July 22 is approved. ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL ITEMS (Continued) . Approval of architectural cases is valid for two years. Ine approval granted must be exercised within that time period unless extended CASE 3.0264 (MINOR) . Application by PALM SPRINGS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT for approval of a portable classroom building to be located at Palm Springs Youth Center on Mesquite Avenue between El Cielo/E1 Placer, W-R-1-C Zone, Section 19. Planner (Vankeek0h) stated that the original Commission approval of portable buildings will expire in November, but that the School District has now requested a third portable unit on the site, and` that the building will be used for a continuation high school . She stated that the School District is also considering buying the Youth Center. Chairman stated that temporary buildings often become permanent and that if the School District continues the pattern, the site will look like a used trailer lot. He stated that a master plan is necessary, that no more approval should be given until it is presented, and that the proposal is a poor usage for the nice area. `... Planning Director explained that there has been turnover in the School District business office, that the person who placed the first trailer is no longer with the School District, and that the School District has been trying to resolve the continuation school problem and to obtain state funds to purchase the site and renovate the Youth Center building which will be costly. He stated that there are both land use and architectural issues involved and that if the site were purchased, a CUP and GPA would be required to operate the school . He stated that if the two were approved, the City would have no control over what is on the site, except maintenance if a maintenance agreement were signed. He stated that the School District is financially insecure and has no budget for aesthetics or environment, although it has been discussed in committees to which he belongs, and that the Commission can take action to not have portables on the site. He stated that the state has mandated that 30 percent of school housing (classrooms) be put in portables for flexibility in housing students, and that the height of the trailers, including a .three-foot platform, is approximately 12 feet. Commissioner Hough stated that the site should be screened by landscaping and a plan submitted, and that there is a covered area that is permanent on the site which seems in conflict with the idea of portable buildings. Planning Director stated that the District has not requested a time extension and that a master plan timetable should be required. July 22, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 10 CASE 3.0264 (MINOR) (Continued) Commissioner Whitney stated that she understood the need for screening, but ... that she is sympathetic to the School District and to force it to spend money on temporary areas is not in the best interest of the students since the money could be spent on other more necessary items. Chairman stated that before any more approvals are given to structures that might be on the site forever, a master plan and screening plan should be submitted by the District; and that the school should be informed by staff that piecemeal placement of portables will not be approved and a master plan is needed. Commissioner Whitney suggested that the Commission assist the School District to relocate the portables where they are not as visible. M/S/C (Hough/Neel ; Edgmon absent) removing the application from the agenda until a master plan and landscape plan are submitted by the School District. CASE 5.0405-CUP. Application by the CITY OF PALM SPRINGS for architectural approval of final development plans for Phase I of a public park (McCallum Desert Reserve) on El Cielo Road, north of Sonora Road, W-R-1-C Zone, Section 19. M/S/C (Curtis/Hough; Edmon absent) tabling the application. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS ADDED STARTERS. (Determination of eligibility for consideration. ) None. CASE 3.0010. Application by WESSMAN DEVELOPMENT CO. for Halasi-Levinson Associates for architectural approval of a detailed grading plan for a 104- unit apartment complex (Casa Del Sol ) at Belardo Road/Morongo Road intersection, R-3 Zone (IL) , Section 22. Planner (Green) stated that the AAC and staff were concerned :with the design of the frontage which shows a slope up to a boundary wall , and that the slope and the wall total approximately 11 feet in height which is a harsh design. He stated that the applicant indicated he would redesign the frontage, but he now is requesting approval of the grading with the grading details to be returned to the Commission in the future. Design issues were discussed. Commissioner Hough questioned whether or not a minimum height on the frontage could be conditioned. Planner explained that a four-foot wall with a two-foot retainer to make the slope less steep could be considered. Commissioner Whitney objected to approving a design which may force the July 22, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 11 CASE 3.0010. (Continued) Commi_ss.ion to compromise in the future. Chairman stated that the design is too sensitive and should not be approved until it is satisfactory. Planning Director stated that the applicants are raising pads on the project, not lowering streets, and need fill on the frontage, and that the applicants are requesting a waiver of the sidewalk requirement which is an unusual condition in a multi-family zone. Chairman suggested that the frontage be lowered and stated that the application should be continued because much dirt is being moved on the site. M/S/C (Olsen/Curtis; Edgmon absent) continuing the application to August 12. CASE 3.0251 (MINOR) . Application by WILLIAM KLIENDIENST for architectural approval of remodel and addition to single-family residence at 690 Stevens Road, R-1-A Zone, Section 10. M/S/C (Curtis/Whitney; Edgmon absent) removing the application from the table. Planning Director stated that the major concern is that the applicant is requesting maximum lot coverage in the R-1-A Zone, and that there are no grounds for a variance or varying from the provisions of the Ordinance. Planner (Williams) stated that the applicant's plan is to add 1500 sq. ft. in the rear of the house and that the addition will not be visible from the <... street and that they are requesting a 32 percent lot coverage, although the maximum allowed is 30 percent. Chairman asked whether or not an AMM could be granted. Planning Director stated that there are no grounds since the lot is a standard one and no different from other lots in the vicinity, and that the Ordinance shouldn't be changed if the Commission wants to increase lot coverage to 32 percent. He stated that there is a exorbitant amount of concrete on the lot at the present and that the AAC recommended that some of the concrete be removed and landscaping planted since there is not much landscaping on the site. Will Kleindienst, 221 S. Palm Canyon Drive, project architect, stated that the lot is steep. Planner explained that the addition would be 500 sq. ft over the maximum allowed. Commissioner Olsen stated that if the slope area were included, there would be more square footage in the lot. Planning Director stated that the Ordinance does not allow for deficiencies in lot sizes, only in lot coverage, and that findings for a variance must be made to allow extra coverage. He stated that the lot is over the minimum size and the lot is not causing the coverage problem (the addition is). He stated that the applicant could build a second story, but is handicapped and does not want to add the second story; and that no matter what the requirements, there is always someone who wants to have more. July 22, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 12 CASE 3.0251 (MINOR) (Continued) Mr. _Klei.ndie,nst stated that there is no place that the applicant is willing to reduce footage because of her lifestyle which includes much entertaining, and that the mechanical equipment has been placed on the roof because there is no room for it on the lot. Chairman stated that he understood the Planning Director' s point of view on the percentage of coverage, but that the difference between 68% and 70% is small . Planning Director stated that people often request that the Ordinance be ignored and that the Ordinance could be changed to allow Planning Commission approval of additional lot coverage, but that a percentage of coverage is more definite and that variance procedures could be discussed with the Council regarding this. Chairman stated that lot coverage should be done through the AMM procedures, and that perhaps the Hillside Ordinance would be applicable. Planning Director stated that there is staff approval through the AMM process, but findings like those of a variance must be made. Assistant City Attorney also explained that findings have to be made for AMMs. Planning Director reviewed the AMM section of the revised Zoning Ordinance and stated that the new Ordinance provides for 20 percent additional coverage if findings can be made and suggested that the Commission review the architecture and direct staff to resolve the lot coverage issue. M/S/C (Curtis/Hough; Edgmon absent) approving the application, subject to the following conditions: 1. That final landscape plans, including lighting and irrigation, be submitted to the AAC for review and approval . 2. That the driveway on the easterly portion of the property be realigned to include more landscaping. 3. That all recommendations of the Development Committee be met. 4. That the lot coverage issue be resolved between applicant and staff. CASE 3.0194. Application by ROY WILLIAMS CONSTRUCTION CO. for Robbie Reed's —Reesfa—urant (formerly Jasper's) for architectural approval of an entryway at 500 E. Palm Canyon Drive, R-3 Zone, Section 23. Planner (Vankeeken ) explained that the AAC felt that any entryway addition should be integrated with the architecture, and that the applicants want a shaded area for patrons. M/S/C (Olsen/Whitney; Edgmon absent) for a restudy, noting the following: That the proposed design does not complement the building. (The condition is possible, however, the design needs to be integrated with the existing architecture. ) July 22, 1.987 PC MINUTES Page 13 CASE 3.721. Application by CITY OF PALM SPRINGS REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY for architectural approval of detailed landscape plans for Indian Avenue. Planning Director stated that the plan show a continuation of the palm tree plantings of Robusta palms on 60-foot centers with bus-stop accents and that the plan began with Crepe Myrtle trees which have a good appearance, but branch too low for pedestrians, and that a type of ash tree will be reviewed. He stated that sidewalks would be continued to Alejo on the east side for a continuous surface and that the plans would not be reviewed by the Commission again unless review is requested by the Commission. M/S/C (Olsen/Whitney; Edgmon absent) approving the application, subject to the following conditions: 1. That additional shade trees be provided at the bus stop areas. 2. That canopy trees be aligned with parking spaces. 3. That an alternate species for the Crepe Myrtle be explored. 4. That tree type changes be reviewed by staff with Commissioner Neel . CASE 3.0266 (Minor) . Initiation by the CITY OF PALM SPRINGS GOLDEN ANNIVERSARY COMMITTEE of architectural approval of a vertical banner concept on Palm Canyon Drive Indian Avenue, and Sunrise Park and flagpoles on Tahquitz Way to advertise the City's 50th Anniversary Celebration. �..- Assistant City Attorney stated that Commissioner Whitney would be required to abstain, since she is Chairman of the Golden Anniversary Committee. Planning Director stated that several 50th Anniversary designs for areas in the City will be reviewed by the Commission; that banners will be placed across the streets near the tram and downtown with vertical "castle" banners placed on brackets on trees alternating on sides of the streets on Palm Canyon and Indian; and that the AAC and Council agreed with the concept. He stated that flags of 50 states, Mexico, and Canada will be placed on brackets and hung along Tahquitz from the downtown to Sunrise. Director of Parks, Recreation and Library stated that for a more festive appearance for a "Fun-in-the-Park Day" for the 50th anniversary celebration on April 23, 1988, the Committee is proposing vertical banners at Belardo and Sunrise, Sunrise and Ramon, and the entrances to the Pavilion parking lot. M/S/C (Curtis/Hough; Whitney abstained; Edgmon absent) approving the application, subject to the following condition: That the details of the bracket and method of attachment be reviewed by staff. July 22, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 14 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS (Continued) CASE 5.,0452-MISC. Planning Commission review of DESERT WATER AGENCY CAPITAL IMPROV M NT PROGRAM for fiscal year 1987/88. Planning Director stated that a requirement of state law is that CIPs of agencies be reviewed by the Planning Commission for compliance with the City's General Plan, that there are no proposed extensions into urban reserve areas or guarded areas for the DWA improvements; and that the CIP is in conformance with the City' s General Plan. M/S/C (Curtis/Olsen; Edgmon absent) finding that the DWA CIP is consistent with the City's General Plan. CASE 5.0405-CUP. Application by the CITY OF PALM SPRINGS for architectural approval of final development plans for Phase I of a public park (McCallum Desert Reserve) on E1 Cielo Road, north of Sonora Road, W-R-1-C Zone, Section 19. M/S/C (Olsen/Curtis; Edgmon absent) removing the item from the table. Planner (Evans) described the final development plans. He stated that one of the conditions of approval was that the park benefit the neighborhood; that the final plans delete the connection to the equestrian center; and that the change requires a public hearing and no final action can be taken by the Commission until the public hearing. He stated that the planting theme is consistent with the preliminary plan which shows desert plantings for the four desert areas of the Southwest. He presented the Planning Division Development Committee conditions. Fred Hawkins, Director of Parks, Recreation and Library, stated that the project had been in the planning stages for two years, that the Council is interested in creating a desert preserve, that because of the uniqueness of the project it is funded by the McCallum Foundation and the City, that $115,000 has been funded, and that the area was chosen as a demonstration model for state funding. He stated that there has been some confusion over the desirability of an access road into the Equestrian Center, but that in designing the road, it was determined that division would develop two distinct areas at the park (causing the park to lose its naturalness) and that instead a loop road into the park has been designed which is needed for maintenance. He stated that the road all the way through the park will not solve problems for residents on Sonora Road and that the material for the loop road can be "steel slag" which can be used for the parking lot, resembles concrete but is gray and gravelly and gives a rural appearance, and can be driven on in inclement weather. He stated that curbs and gutters do not lend themselves to the appearance of the park, that there have been varying feelings about even having a road from various commissions (some of whom did not want the road) , and that the AAC feels that the road should not go through the park. He stated that the perimeter fence concept is bollards and chains similar to the fencing at Mesquite Country Club to prevent entrance by off-road vehicles and that the cost estimate for landscaping alone is considerable and may exceed $115,000. He ...,, stated that through discussions with the Engineering Division, FAU funds can be used for improvements on El Cielo and that landscape architects are designing and choosing plant materials for the four desert areas depicted July 22, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 15 CASE .50405-MISC. (Continued) and that the concept is unique and exciting and will benefit the City. He stated that phasing is necessary because of inflationary costs. Commissioner Hough stated that he did not see what benefits the road through the park would be to residents on Sonora. Commissioner Olsen agreed, stating that a road through the park might become heavily travelled instead of a leisurely road for people who enjoy the foliage and that the CUP condition should be revised if necessary. Commissioner Hough stated that the road would be gated and closed at night. Director of Parks, Recreation and Library stated that vandalism and theft are problems. Commissioner Curtis stated that since the project is phased, it would be best to include improvements on E1 Cielo with Phase I because of the possibility of future funding problems. Director of Parks, Recreation and Library stated that street improvements on E1 Cielo hopefully will be complete when the park opens. Discussion followed on street improvements. Commissioner Olsen stated his motion alluded to street improvements on El Cielo and Sonora street frontages being constructed with Phase II. M/S/C (Olsen/Curtis; Edgmon absent) approving the application, . subject to .. the following conditions: 1. That all recommendations of the Development Committee be met. 2. That street improvements on El Cielo be constructed with Phase 1. 3. That a public hearing be scheduled due to the change in the configuration of the park road. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS (Continued) CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS. Update of City Council actions. Case 5.0400-ZTA. Council is reviewing the Ordinance revisions weekly and as questions on the 18 to 24-foot height limit. The Ordinance has been adopted as an interim one for approximately four months. All revisions suggested by the City Council will be returned to the Commission before that time. Hillside curbs and gutters. Council may not redo the hillside standards, unless there is a arge area proposed for development. Council is concerned about flood control even though the members do not like curbs and gutters on the hillsides. t July 22, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 16 CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS. (Continued) Joint Worskshop with Council . Workshop may be scheduled in the fall on General Pan and zoning issues. No final action by the Commission or Council will be deferred on any project. ADMINISTRATIVE NOTE Planning Director stated that there were people in the audience who were not present When their cases were heard and wished to speak and the Commission might wish to reconsider the actions taken earlier in the meeting. i ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL ITEMS (Continued) Approval of architectural cases is valid for two years. The approval granted must be exercised within that time period unless extended. CASE 3.0236. Application by MICHAEL PIO for architectural approval of warehouse/office complex on Valdivia Way between Tachevah Drive/La Campana, M-1-P Zone, Section 7. Mike Pio, the applicant, explained that action was taken by the Commission for a restudy of the project and that he felt that staff direction and concerns had been addressed in the resubmitted plans. He requested more discussion since the delay will create a hardship because his current lease is expiring. Commissioners declined to reconsider their action. CASE 3.0010. Application by WESSMAN DEVELOPMENT CO. for Halasi-Levinson Associates for architectural approval of a detailed grading plan for a 104- unit apartment complex (Casa Del Sol ) at Belardo Road/Morongo Road intersection, R-3 Zone (IL) , Section 22. John Wessman, 72200 Clancy Lane, Rancho Mirage, stated that he thought the grading design was a minor problem. Chairman explained that the item was continued by the Commission until a transition is developed between the street and the first building pad. Mr. Wessman explained that staff had a resolution to the problem which would be to have a three-foot retaining wall at the lower point. He stated that there had never been a sidewalk on the property and requested that the condition be waived and that the City Engineer had said that there was no problem in not having a sidewalk. He stated that the idea was to put landscaping in instead. Discussion continued at the display board. Mr. Wessman remarked that he had a rough grading permit to level the site. July 22, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 17 CASE 3.0010. (Continued) Planning Director noted that the Director of Community Development has given Mr. Wessman a storage permit for the fill dirt. Chairman directed that the problems be resolved with staff since the Commission does not want to approve the application until the grading design is resolved. Planning Director stated that sidewalks are a condition of approval . Mr. Wessman noted that there were no serious feelings that sidewalks were necessary because of the project's location, that he wanted to put in landscaping and that the sidewalk issue needs coordination between Engineering and Planning staffs. Commission declined to reconsider the action. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS (Continued) COMMISSION/STAFF REPORTS OR REQUESTS. Commissioner Whitney stated that she felt uneasy in not addressing the problems of the PIO warehouse office complex, since the applicant saw that the Wessman project was discussed at length with Mr. Wessman. She stated that it presented a community relations problem. Commissioner Hough stated that the Wessman project was a problem that might have been able to be resolved, but that the warehouse project has to have a redesign. Chairman agreed, stating that the Pio project was approval of the entire project, whereas the Wessman project was only involved with details. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to discuss, Chairman adjourned the meeting at 3:50 p.m. PLANKING DIRECTOV MDR/ml WP/PC MIN PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Council Chamber, City Hall August 12, 1987 1:30 p.m. ROLL CALL F-Y 1987 - 1988 Present Present Excused Absences Planning Commission This Meeting to Date to date Larry Lapham, Chairman X 3 0 Hugh Curtis X 3 0 Martha Edgmon X 2 1 Brent Hough - 2 1 Earl Neel X 3 0 Gary Olsen X 3 0 Barbara Whitney X 3 0 Staff Present Marvin D. Roos, Planning Director Siegfried Siefkes, Assistant City Attorney Douglas Evans, Planner Robert Green, Planner Richard Patenaude, Planner Margo Williams, Planner Carol Vankeeken, Planner Dave Forcucci , Zoning Enforcement Jerry Gonzalez, Traffic Engineer • Ken Feenstra, Redevelopment Director Mary E. Lawler, Recording Secretary Architectural Advisory Committee - August 10, 1987 Chris Mills, Chairman Absent: Martha Edgmon, Alternate Tom Doczi Mike Buccino William Johnson Brent Hough Will Kleindienst Gary Olsen Barbara Whitney Chairman called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. M/S/C (Neel/Olsen; Hough absent) approving minutes of July 22, 1987 as submitted. ADMINISTRATIVE NOTE: There were no Tribal Council comments. •