HomeMy WebLinkAbout1987/06/10 - MINUTES 7
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
Council Chamber, City Hall
June 10, 1987
1:30 p.m.
ROLL CALL F-Y 1986 - 1987
Present Present Excused Absences
Planning Commission This Meeting to Date to date
Larry Lapham, Chairman X 21 0
Hugh Curtis X 19 2
Martha Edgmon X 10 1
Brent Hough X 15 0
Earl Neel X 18 3
Gary Olsen X 17 4
Barbara Whitney X 16 3
Staff Present
Marvin D. Roos, Planning Director
Siegfried Siefkes, Assistant City Attorney
Robert Green, Planner
Carol Vankeeken, Planner
Dave Forcucci , Zoning Enforcement Officer
Jerry Gonzalez, Traffic Engineer
Page Garner, Engineering Aide
John Isidoro, Engineering Aide
Monica Tushscher, Planning Technician
Mary E. Lawler, Recording Secretary
Architectural Advisory Committee - June 8, 1987
Chris Mills, Chairman Absent: Mike Buccino
Tom Doczi
Martha Edgmon
Brent Hough
William Johnson
Will Kleindienst
Barbara Whitney
Chairman called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m.
M/S/C (Neel/Curtis) approving minutes of May 13 and May 20, 1987 as submitted.
There were no Tribal Council comments.
June 10, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 2
CONSENT ACTION AGENDA
Approval of architectural cases is valid for two years. The approval granted
must be exercised within that time period unless extended.
M/S/C (Whitney/Edgmon) taking the following actions:
CASE 3.0205-MINOR (Continued) . Application by ORCHID TREE HOTEL for
architectural approval of walls and gates to close the Baristo Road
entrance of the patios and revised exterior colors of the walls at 261
S. Belardo Road, R-3 Zone, Section 15.
Approved subject to the following conditions:
1. That the existing gray color is approved for the wall only.
2. That the slump stone wall color be reviewed by the AAC and
Commission in the future.
CASE 3.0095. Application by THE HOLT GROUP for Frank Matranga for architec-
tura T approval of revised landscape plans for office/print shop on
Valdiva Way between Compana Way/Tachevah Drive, M-1-P Zone, Section 7.
Approved subject to the following condition:
1. That the sign shall be integrated with the landscaping.
2. That olives shall be 48" box minimum.
3. That two large canopy trees shall be added to the finger planters
on the north of the building.
4. That the Yucca Pendula shall be grouped at the entry (or substi-
tute 24" box Chamerops) .
5. That 4 Fi cus Benj ami na shall be added in the planters on the east
and west sides of the building.
6. That 5 gallon Hibiscus shall be substituted for Gardenia on the
south side of the building.
CASE 3.0164 - MINOR. Application by JOHN BUND for Sbarro Restaurant for
arch i ec ura approval of revised lettered awning and window sign for
Sbarro Restaurant in the Desert Fashion Plaza, 123 N. Palm Canyon Drive,
PD-147, Section 15.
Approved subject to the following conditions:
1. That no artificial plant material shall be used (landscape plans
shall be submitted for staff approval . )
2. That the window sign is not approved (detailed plans shall be sub-
mitted) .
3. That the planter wall shall die into the adjoining northerly wall
(rather than terminate at an angle) .
June 10, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 3
CONSENT ACTION AGENDA (Continued)
CASE 3.0227 MINOR. Application by KAPTUR & CIOFFI for architectural
approval of exterior revisions to the Vineyard Shopping Complex on S.
Palm Canyon Drive, C-B-D Zone, Section 15.
Removed from the agenda at the applicant's request.
ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT ACTION AGENDA
Approval of architectural cases is valid for two years. The approval granted
must be exercised within that time period unless extended.
CASE 3.0204-MINOR (Continued) . Application by JOHN WALLING for architectural
approval of revised exterior colors for single family hillside residence
at 575 N. Patencio Road, R-1-A Zone, Section 10.
Planner (Green) explained that the applicant prefers the darkest gray
color but that the color sample submitted for this color is different
from the actual color.
Commissioner Curtis stated that he preferred the color that is presently
painted on the building, which is the darkest gray color.
Discussion followed at the board.
M/S/C (Curtis/Edgmon; Whitney dissented) approving the darkest gray
color (the color that is presently on the building).
ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL ITEMS
Approval of architectural cases is valid for two years. The approval granted
must be exercised within that time period unless extended.
CASE 3.0191. Application by GREAT AMERICAN MINI STORAGE for architectural
approval of revised plans for office/warehouse buildings on Farrell
Drive/Research Drive, M-1-P Zone, Section 12.
Planner (Green) explained the location, architecture, site plan, land-
scaping, and colors of the building, and stated that the AAC dissenting
vote was that of Mr. Mills who voted against the original concept.
M/S/C (Edgmon/Whitney) approving the application subject to the
following conditions:
1. That a desert landscape concept shall be investigated for the
Farrell frontage. The landscape theme shall coordinate with the
DMV landscape concept.
2. That solid metal gates shall be used for the mini storage area to
preclude views into the site.
June 10, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 4
ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT ACTION AGENDA (Continued)
CASE 3.0191. (Continued)
3. That the sign shall have the same venacular as the building.
4. That the landscape strip shall be relocated against the building
in the interior courts.
5. That the wing wall on the southerly boundary shall return 6' to
the east.
6. That all recommendations of the Development Committee shall be
met.
CASE 3.720. Application by ROBERT RICCIARDI for Harvey Izen for architectural
approval of revised plans for single family residence on Camino Del
Monte between Camino Carmelitas/Mountain, R-1-C Zone, Section 27.
Planner (Green) stated that the revised plan shows a lower retaining
wall in the front and the building frontage stepped, but that the
elevations remain the same; that the AAC discussed massing and hillside
integration of the house at length; that staff recommends hydrology and
soil studies; that the applicant is requesting concept approval before
undertaking the expense of the studies; and that if the design changes,
the Commission will review the application again.
M/S/C (Olsen/Curtis; Neel abstained; Edgmon dissented) approving the
concept subject to the following conditions:
1. That walls faced with natural stone shall be provided on the north
and south sides of the building. The rock walls shall die into
the hillside. The stairway on the north elevation shall be inte-
grated into the wall .
2. That the garage roof and elevation proportions shall be revised to
complement the house.
3. That a revised color (darker) shall be submitted for the building.
4. That if elevations are revised due to the hydrology and soil
studies, the application shall be returned to the AAC and
Commission for review.
5. That all recommendations of the Development Committee be imple-
mented.
MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS
DISCUSSION. Planning Commission discussion of Sign Ordinance provisions
relating to second story uses in The Plaza, on S. Palm Canyon Driver
between Tahquitz Way/Arenas Road, C-B-D Zone, Section 15.
Planning Director explained that there is an existing old sign on the
north side of Desmonds on the second floor with 18 inch green letters;
that some of the apartments on the upper level have converted to
June 10, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 5
MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS
DISCUSSION. (Continued)
commercial and small office uses; and that the proposal will place a
sign on the opposite corner closer to Palm Canyon and on a portion of
the building not controlled by Desmonds. He stated that since the plaza
is a unique piece of architecture, staff would not oppose a sign under a
sign program for the Plaza.
Commissioner Curtis stated that adding a sign would clutter the space.
Planning Director stated that the sign proposed would be a vertical one
between the window and the northwest corner on the same face as the
green lettered Desmonds sign.
Chairman suggested that the Commission review the proposal on site.
Zoning Enforcement Officer explained that Desmonds has two signs because
one is considered a pedestrian convenience sign and the other is a main
identification sign; and that the upper floor tenant proposes a sign,
because Desmonds has a second story sign. He stated that the proposal
is a vertical sign slipped in next to the horizontal Desmonds sign; that
the proposal would make the space seem cluttered; and that the City
would probably would have to require that Desmonds remove their sign
which has been there for twenty years.
Consensus was that the Commission and AAC would review the proposal on
the bus tour on June 12.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
CASE 5.0433-CZ (Continued) . Application by EL CIELO ASSOCIATES for a change
of zone Professional to "C-1" (Central Retail Business) on the
northeast corner of E1 Cielo/Ramon Roads, "P" Zone, Section 18.
(Commission response to written comments on written draft negative
declaration; action, no comments received. )
Planning Director explained that the "P" Zone allows more intense
development of office space and some commercial and ancillary uses above
R-2 requirements including restaurants, banks and health clubs; that the
"P designation was granted previously, but did not resolve the problem
of developing the property and that the applicants now request C-1,
which allows many uses including convenience stores, restaurants, auto
part sales, and as such the request is inappropriate. He stated that
proposals of the type have been denied by the Commission and Council in
the past; that the property is unique since it abuts an airport zone;
and that the Airport Master Plan indicates hotels immediately adjacent.
He stated that because of these facts staff would make findings for
denial although alternatives to the Commission have been proposed in an
addendum report; that the applicant has submitted a site plan for review
which has not been processed, that a planned development district for
the site would require a General Plan amendment by State law if the uses
were not consistent with the General Plan, that the benefits of a
June 10, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 6
PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued)
CASE 5.0433-CZ. (Continued)
Planned Development District allow some flexibility in uses and that the
PD could be reviewed concurrently with the General Plan study and a full
series of public hearings. In explanation he stated that for the
applicant to achieve his proposal for the site, a General Plan amendment
is required, but if the applicant changes his mind on the uses or the
General Plan is not changed, the PD would be null and void because it is
inconsistent with the General Plan.
Chairman declared the hearing open.
Chris Mills, 121 S. Palm Canyon, project architect, stated that there is
no problem with a Planned Development District, that a list of uses
would be given to the Commission instead of approving wide open "C" Zone
uses; that there is no intent to have convenience food stores or any
automotive uses allowed by C-1 Zoning; that the project would meet
development standards of the "P" Zone and would be single story even
though the height for the"P-1"Zone is 30 ft. ; that the project will not be
strip-zoning; that it is not a neighborhood shopping center although
referred to by staff in that way; that the site is special because of
the airport use; that it fronts on two streets that can handle the
traffic generated. He stated that he hoped the Commission would feel
that the type of use is appropriate if handled appropriately. He
requested that the Commission approve the General Plan amendment and a
Planned Development District processed concurrently. He stated that the
list would be composed of several uses not allowed by "P" Zoning, and it
could include ice cream shops to dry cleaning establishments; that C-1
zone uses would be reviewed and some removed if not appropriate.
Planning Director stated that the resort commercial designation consists
of mostly C-1 and R-3 uses and that the intent would be uses similar to
the C-B-D and high end retail ; and that there was a resort commercial
designation on Smoketree Property for a restaurant and theater project
which was abandoned.
Chairman suggested that vaguely defined resort commercial uses be more
specific such as those of the C-1-AA.
There being no further appearances, the hearing was closed.
Commissioner Olsen noted that the intersection of El Cielo and Ramon is
very important to the City's image because of the tourist traffic
emanating from the airport; that retail/commercial development would not
be appealing; that these concerns should be considered; and also that
traffic problems should be addressed.
Chairman asked if the applicant would be opposed to uses such as those
on Tahquitz-McCallum; since the new zone is similar to a C-1-AA Zone.
Commissioner Hough stated that he agreed with Commissioner Olsen that a
zone change and General Plan amendment would set a precedent for other
property treatment and that a PD has more control . Commissioner Whitney
agreed.
June 10, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 7
PUBLIC HEARINGS. (Continued)
CASE 5.0433-CZ. (Continued)
Commissioner Neel stated that there is much "P" Zoning in existence and
that a single story structure would be better for neighbors than a 30
ft. high building.
Chairman stated that C-1-AA Zoning uses (high end commercial ) would not
impact the intersection and that the building height could be restricted
and direction given to the applicant under a PD; and that a zone change
would not be appropriate.
M/S/C (Neel/Hough; Curtis/Edgmon abstained; Whitney dissented) removing
the application from the agenda pending a General Plan amendment study
with direction toward resort commerical and a Planned Development
District in lieu of a change of zone.
CASE 5.0442-MISC. Initiation by the CITY OF PALM SPRINGS for consideration of
ermina ion of a non-conforming car rental facility at 351 N. Indian
Avenue, C-B-D Zone, Section 15.
(The ten year abatement period for the facility expired on March 3,
1986. This action is categorically exempt from environmental assess-
ment, per CEQA).
Planning Director recommended a two week continuance at the applicants
request, and stated that the site has become an office for the car
rental agency at the airport with no rental cars on the site; that the
owner has requested a short term time extension; that staff and the
Redevelopment Director have discussed combining of the property with the
Date Barn property; and that staff is considering the possibility of a
time-extension even though findings have been made for termination of
the use.
Chairman declared the hearing open; there being no appearances, the
hearing was closed.
M/S/C (Curtis/Hough) continuing the application to June 24 at the
applicant's request.
TTM 22401. Application by MAINIERO, SMITH AND ASSOCIATES for Sunspot -Kramer
for a tentative tract map to develop 14 single family residences on
Racquet Club Road between Cardillo Road/Girasol , R-1-C Zone, Section 3.
(Environmental assessment; tentative approval . )
Planning Director stated that Engineering Division staff were present to
give Engineering's viewpoint on the applicants request to delete curbs
and gutters.
Planner (Green) stated that staff recommended reducing street widths for
the site by using hillside standards and deferring curb and gutter until
June 10, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 8
PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued)
TTM 22401. (Continued)
similar improvements were added elsewhere in the area; that the appli-
cants also requested asphalt and redwood headers for the streets which
was recommended to be restudied because of lack of endurance of the
material ; and that the plans have been resubmitted as asphalt with a
natural gravel swale at the sides for a more durable edge to the road
and for drainage control . He stated that staff recommends a barrier
wall for privacy and for water control along the east property line and
that staff does not agree with Engineering conditions requiring con-
struction of curbs and gutters and sidewalks on Girasol , construction of
a cul-de-sac, with a 50 foot street right-of-way since there is a hill-
side street standard and no sidewalks on the hillside. He also
discussed environmental concerns as reviewed in this Environmental
Assessment/Initial Study, and stated that the AAC recommended approval
subject to conditions. He stated that surrounding lots are irregular in
shape and approximately the same size.
Engineering Aide (Isidoro) stated that the Engineering Division is con-
cerned about the erosion on the sides of the streets since the water
flow exceeds three feet per second.
Chairman declared the hearing open.
Chris Mills, the applicant, 121 S. Palm Canyon Drive, stated that there
is a disagreement between two staff divisions on the conditions so the
Commission decision will be difficult. He stated that he had concerns
about some requirements. He noted that the masonry wall on the east
property line was originally needed for flood control and was deleted
because flood control can be achieved with natural swale using existing
boulders for a more natural effect and also that setbacks of existing
houses are minimal thus making walls difficult. He stated that in the
hillside area there are very few walls along a property line since a
wall is only effective for privacy if it is closer to the use (such as a
swimming pool ) and adequate in height to effectuate privacy. He stated
that the walls would be built on property lines if necessary for flood
control . Regarding curbs and gutters, he stated that there are none in
the area; that a covenant would be acceptable for future improvements;
and that curbs and gutters would detract from the appearance of the area
and would be inconsistent with the entire neighborhood, as would be
street lights. He stated that flooding could be controlled by a gravel
swale along the side of street. He requested that the Ordinance
requirement for turnarounds for the two lots fronting Racquet Club be
deleted since it is not natural to the area and doubted that the traffic
counts would be too high. He stated also that there is a requirement
for pads to be 18 inches above curb, but that the proposal is to place
fill on the Racquet Club lots rather than cutting, and stated that the
elimination of the curbs, gutters and sidewalks suggested by Planning is
acceptable. He requested that wording be changed to "substantially
equal " rather than "as shown" on the requirements for pad elevations in
the preliminary grading plan to allow flexibility on the final grading
plan.
Louie Lombard, 2480 Leonard, a long time resident, stated that the view
from the area is spectacular and that there is abundant wildlife that
June 10, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 9
PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued)
TTM 22401. (Continued)
would be affected by the development. He stated that he had bought the
lot below his to insure his vista; that he has built many improvements
and landscaping on his property; that he was concerned about the roof
height of the project blocking his views and also the increase in
traffic and the disturbance of wildlife.
Benton Beckley, 2481 Leonard, stated that Girasol forms a boundary line
between the large and small lots; that his area has the largest lots;
that entry should be Colony Court, not Racquet Club; that there are many
developable lots without homes in the area; that the beautiful area
should not be spoiled; that there will be a flooding problem; that curbs
and gutters should be required because of flooding since water flows
down Racquet Club. He requested the price range of the homes (Mr. Mills
stated that they would range from $150,000 to $200,000).
Alan Russell , 2423 Tuscan, requested information on watering during con-
struction and also questioned the height of the roofs.
Chairman stated that there would be watering by ordinance during the
entire period of construction until a crust is established on the
surface.
Mr. Mills stated that the roof height would be 15 ft. to the top of a
pitched roof, that there would be a mixture of flat and pitched roofs;
and that the houses are tri-level without much grading.
Mr. Russell stated that the house across from him is 17-11 ft. to the top
of the roof even though the neighbors voiced opposition and filed a
petition.
Matt Sumich, 2485 Tuscan, stated that he started the petition regarding
the Ainsworth house; that the house was higher than requirements for the
area with a fireplace added which accentuated the height; that he was
not against development if properly done and integrated well ; and that
there were problems with a Desert Water Agency project previously and no
impacts were noted in the EIR for that project; that there are problems
with blowing sand because of the high winds in the area; that the home
next to the Ainsworth house lost its roof in a recent windstorm; and
that followup after construction is important.
There being no further appearances, the hearing was closed.
Planner stated that the pads on the preliminary grading plan showed
reduced setbacks under a AMM; that a city-wide assessment district for
curbs and gutters is being considered, and that these requirements for
the project could be addressed under a covenant and installed when the
City-wide project is in effect.
June 10, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 10
PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued)
F�
TTM 22401. (Continued)
Planning Director explained that a public hearing is necessary for the
proposal because the Subdivision Map Act requires that all maps have
public hearings; and that the only time public hearings are not held is
when a project has already been through public hearings under another
application such as a conditional use permit or planned development
district.
Mr. Mills stated that the average size of the homes will be 2500 sq.
ft. ; that the pads cannot be graded only where the building is being
constructed because of the rocky nature of the area; and that the rocks
will have to be pushed aside during the construction and placed back on
the lot after construction is completed. He stated that the intent is
to build all 14 homes at the same time, and that all the homes will be
submitted in the near future for architectural review. He stated that
curbs and gutters control water better than the present condition of the
area, and that there is a problem during heavy rains, but that the area
is natural and enjoyable because it does not have these improvements;
and that he hopes the city-wide assessment district will not affect
hillside areas. He stated that walls will be the responsibility of each
home owner if privacy is desired, although the stepping of the homes
will afford privacy.
Commissioner Olsen stated that he did not feel that the gravel swale on
the side of the road will stay there, and that the turnaround require-
ment should be reviewed.
Mr. Mills stated that there is no definite standard for wall setbacks
but if required by flood control , the wall would probably be 2 ft. back
from the property line.
Planning Director stated that the site will be reviewed during the June
12 bus tour and that staff is recommending deferring not waiving the
curb and gutter requirement, and that there could be a compromise on the
requirements which would control water flow as well as keeping the pave-
ment intact. He stated that in response to neighbors complaints on the
Ainsworth house and their petition, the Planning Commission has adopted
a policy that immediately adjacent property owners be notified of pro-
posed hillside residential construction.
Chairman stated that he agreed with postponing curb and gutters until an
assessment district is formed because of the nature of the area and the
irregular appearance that would be caused by portions of curbing and
gutters meeting unimproved portions. He stated also that a wall on the
property line will not afford privacy.
Planning Director stated that the cost of an assessment district is
borne by the adjacent homeowners and determined by lineal frontage and
ease of construction, and that a separate ordinance could be developed
for hillside areas. He stated that the type of development in the area
will determine how heavily traveled Racquet Club becomes, but the JHK
`�' Study calculated that it will be as heavily traveled at full build out
June 10, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 11
PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued)
TTM 22401. (Continued)
as Ramon. He stated that the turnaround requirement is for a hammerhead
or circular driveway for the two lots and is required on many streets so
that cars point into traffic.
M/S/C (Curtis/Olsen) ordering the preparation of a Draft Negative
Declaration, giving tentative approval to the project subject to
conditions, and continuing the application to June 24.
Chairman explained to the homeowners in the audience that he understood
their opposition to development of the site, but that the Commission
cannot arbitrarily deny a property owner the right to develop if he
meets ordinance requirements, even though there are many vacant lots in
the area.
Rod Bureson, of San Bernardino, the property owner, thanked the
Commission for giving tentative approval to the application.
PUBLIC COMMENTS: None.
MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS (CONTINUED)
TIME EXTENSION - CASE 3.830. Application by GEORGE SUTTON for Laurel Palms
Inc. for a twelve-month time extension to construction a 61 unit
apartment complex on San Raphael Drive, between N. Indian Avenue/
Virginia, R-2 Zone, Section 3.
M/S/C (Curtis/Edgmon) approving the 12-month time extension subject to
all original conditions of approval . The new expiration date will be
June 23, 1988.
CASE 5.0419 - MISC. Review of valley-wide transportation study including
recommended c angel within Palm Springs.
Planning Director stated that staff wanted to inform Commissioners of
the impacts of the proposal on the City.
Traffic Engineer stated that the SCAG Traffic Study is for projected
traffic for the year 2010 and outlines regional and local improvements,
that one of the controversial improvements is the Mid-Valley Parkway
extending from Monterey in Palm Desert to I-10, west to Gene Autry Trail
and north to Vista Chino and is to be a high capacity, high speed road
with limited (1/4 mile) access by freeway off ramps. The expressway
criteria would interfer with the type of development in the area and the
City proposes that the alignment follow the south edge of the Whitewater
Wash. He stated that other proposals are widening of Tramway to four
lanes, Ramon to six lanes from Palm Canyon to I-10; and widening of
Sunrise and extending it to the Whitewater Expressway; construction of a
bridge at Camino Real and the Tahquitz Wash and construction of Belardo
over the bridge.
1
June 10, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 12
MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS (Continued)
CASE 5.0419 - MISC. (Continued)
Planning Director stated that there is no unanimity among valley cities
as to the necessity and cost efficiency of the Mid-Valley Parkway, and
that by July 1 the cities are expected to respond to CVAG.
Traffic Engineer stated that Cathedral City has a concern about
acquiring right-of-way on already developed property.
Dave Fassell , City Engineer, City of Cathedral City, stated that the
Cathedral City problems are that there are many intersections on Dinah
Shore Drive making in difficult and expensive to keep the proposed
Parkway alignment; that the City has taken no position on the alignment
along the Whitewater Wash suggested by Palm Springs, although it is
viable and will direct traffic to the same point the SCAG Study
indicates; and that the study will be reviewed by staff for alternatives
and come before the Planning Commission of Cathedral City prior to the
City Council review on July 1.
Planning Director stated that if the plan is approved as proposed it
requires access points along the route, which is not consistent with a
major parkway and if proposed along Gene Autry Trail the area's entire
circulation pattern would have to be redone.
Traffic Engineer explained that acquiring right-of-way for the access
points would be very expensive for the City and would limit development
along Gene Autry Trail . He stated that frontage roads would be required
on Gene Autry as well as driveway closures on the west side of Gene
Autry although there would be some flexibility to develop a frontage
road system on the east side.
Chairman stated that the alignment along the Whitewater Wash is the best
since there is no development to the north and there is direct access to
the valley.
M/S/C (Hough/Curtis) supporting staff's plan showing the Mid-Valley
Parkway alignment on the south edge of the Whitewater Wash and other
staff recommendations on the draft plan.
CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS. Update of City Council actions.
- Zoning Ordinance (Case 5.0400-ZTA) . The Council has directed that the
ordinance be adopted as an interim ordinance in all or part. Further
discussion with the Council will be necessary to address concerns
although the Council generally is positive in its overview of the
ordinance. Council has not responded to having a General Plan review on
the east side of the Airport. A Specific Plan would be necessary
because of multiple property owners and the cost of the Specific Plan
would be reimbursed by developers of the property on a pro-rata basis.
No specific applications have been received although the Desert Sun is
interested in a site on the east side of Gene Autry. Removing 500 acres
of M-1-P would not be detrimental to the City since there are other
l� zones in which industrial uses can locate.
June 10, 1987 PC MINUTES Page 13
COMMISSION/STAFF REPORTS OR REQUESTS.
June 12 AAC/PC BUS TOUR. 8 a.m. leaves City Hall with a 10:30 return.
From 11:00 a.m. to 1: p.m. there will be a discussion of the tour and
luncheon for retiring Commissioners at Las Casuelas Terraza.
Itinerary: Questionnaire will be completed as the bus progresses. The
questionnaire will be general areas of concern. The group will be
reviewing development standards, the General Plan, Zoning issues, and
success rates of new and old projects.
Desert Fashion Plaza (Case 5.0275 PD-147). Vacant store on Palm Canyon
in the Desert Fashion Plaza ronting on alm Canyon has newspapers taped
to the windows. Staff will review.
ADDED STARTERS. None.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to discuss, Chairman adjourned the meeting at
4:00 p.m.
PLANNING UIRLUJUR
MDR/ml
WP/PC MINS
M ,