HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986/10/22 - MINUTES x
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
Council Chamber, City Hall
October 22, 1986
1:30 p.m.
ROLL CALL F-Y 1986 - 1987
Present Present Excused Absences
Planning Commission This Meeting to Date to date
Larry Lapham, Chairman X 7 0
Hugh Curtis X 7 0
Brent Hough X 1 -
Hugh Kaptur X 6 2
Earl Neel X 5 2
Gary Olsen - 6 1
Barbara Whitney X 4 1
Staff Present
Marvin D. Roos, Planning Director
Siegfried Siefkes, Assistant City Attorney
Carol Vankeeken, Planner
Robert Green, Planner
Margo Williams, Planner
Mary E. Lawler, Recording Secretary
Architectural Advisory Committee - October 20, 1986
P1icie4al BUCCi^o
William Johnson
�- Chris Mills
Gary Olsen
Tom Doczi
Barbara Whitney
Chairman called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m.
M/S/C (Curtis/Neel ; Olsen) approving minutes of October 8 as submitted.
There were no Tribal Council comments.
ADMINISTRATIVE NOTE:
Chairman welcomed new Planning Commissioner Brent Hough, local insurance
agent, to the Commission.
October 22, 1986 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 2
CONSENT ACTION AGENDA
Approval of architectural cases is valid for two years. The approval granted
must be exercised within that time period unless extended.
M/S/C (Curtis/Neel ; Olsen absent) taking the following actions:
Case 3.758 (Continued). Application by RATTNER INVESTMENTS, III for architec-
tural approva of revised landscape plans for a 129-unit apartment com-
plex on Farrell Drive between Hwy 111/Sonora Road, R-3 Zone, Section 24.
Removed from the agenda pending receipt of plans.
Abstention: Kaptur
CASE 3.0023. Application by B. LEUNG for A. Yermian for architectural
approval of final detailed landscape, irrigation, and exterior lighting
plans for commercial building at Camino Monte Vista/N. Palm Canyon
Drive, C-1 Zones, Section 10.
Approved subject to the following conditions:
1. That carobs be added to the east property line (to provide the
required 8' screen within reasonable time) .
2. That vines be added to the modified planter at the south property
line.
3. That evergreen trees be substituted for some of the Crepe Myrtle
a..> trees along Camino Monte Vista.
4. That a tree be added to the planter in the parking area.
5. That the details be reviewed by staff.
CASE 3.0114 (MINOR) . Application by PRESCOTT-ANTARES CORPORATION for archi-
tectural approval of landscape, irrigation, and exterior lighting plans
and parking lot plans for existing hotel at 772 Prescott Drive, R-2
Zone, Section 10.
Approved subject to the following conditions:
1. That the concrete be colored, patterned or exposed aggregate.
2. That a striping detail of the spaces be provided.
3. That the details be reviewed by AAC.
October 22, 1986 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 3
CONSENT AGENDA
CASE 3.0120 (MINOR) HOA. Application by SUNRISE OASIS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION
.�, for architectural approval of patio structure at 839 Calle de Mimosas,
PD-30, Section 12.
Approved subject to the following conditions:
1. That cross members be installed.
2. That the structure be painted a dark color to match existing patio
structures on street.
CASE 3.0122 (HOA) . Application by ED BLANCHARD for the Tennis Club Condo
Homeowners ssociation for architectural approval of carports at Tennis
Club at 555 W. Baristo Road, R-G-A(8) Zone, Section 15.
Approved subject to the following conditions:
1. That columns of westerly carport be arranged per marked plans.
2. That the carport including posts and underside of roof be painted
to match existing buildings.
3. That carports be erected without the additional fascia.
TIME EXTENSION - CASE 5.0360-PD-170. Application by MARK KNORRINGA for Robert
T. armington Company or a twelve-month time extension for a Planned
Development District to allow construction of a 190-unit hotel on E.
Palm Canyon Drive, R-2 and R-3 Zones, Section 26.
subject to all original conditions of appro-
Approved twelve-month time extension./ New expiration date: May 6, val .
1987.
CASE 3.953. Application by MICHAEL KINER for Horwitch Galleries for archi-
tectural approval of main identification sign for art gallery at 1090 N.
Palm Canyon Drive between Tachevah Drive/N. Indian Avenue, C-1 Zone,
Section 10.
Approved as submitted.
ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT ACTION AGENDA
Approval of architectural cases is valid for two years. The approval granted
must be exercised within that time period unless extended.
S
October 22, 1986 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 4
ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA
CASE 3.960. Application by CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATES for the Palm Springs Mall for
architectural approval of revised working drawings for the north side of
an existing shopping center on the northwest corner of Tahquitz-McCallum
Way/Farrell Drive, C-S-C Zone, Section 18.
Planner (Williams) presented the project at the display board. She
stated that the AAC recommended that there be a dual wall system (stucco
wall fronted by a glass block wall ) on the north elevation, recommended
approval of the bus stop with benches and shade trees as part of land-
scape plans, and the K-Mart Garden Center subject to conditions.
Discussion ensued on the pedestrian walk on the north elevation.
D. Christian, 1000 S. Palm Canyon, project architect stated that it was
not crucial to the developer whether or not the walk were installed.
Commissioner Kaptur stated that he would be in favor of allowing the
developer to decide whether or not to construct the bus shelter and the
walk.
Motion was made by Kaptur to approve the elevations, bus stop, and
garden center subject to conditions. Motion died for lack of a second.
Discussion ensued on the viability of a bus stop. Commissioner Whitney
stated that shelters become trash collectors and that benches and land-
scaping would be a better choice.
Discussion continued on the walkway. Commissioner Curtis noted that he
felt there should be a walkway and landscaping on the north elevation.
Mr. Christian repeated that there would be merit to having a 4k ft.
sidewalk since there would be some foot traffic on it, but that there
will be several openings into the shopping center and a walkway is not
absolutely necessary. Commissioner Kaptur noted that walks replace
areas which could be landscaped, and that a better treatment would be
landscaping without a walk. Mr. Christian explained that a walkway was
recommended by the landscape architects on the AAC.
Discussion continued on the bus stop. G. Victerson, Benequity
Properties, Wilshire Blvd. , Los Angeles, stated that the bus shelter was
provided in response to planning staff recommendations and is proposed
to be air conditioned, but is not an absolute necessity. Planner stated
that the location is where there was a SunLine stop, that staff recom-
mended that some sun protection be provided, and that the shelter is an
evolution of the recommendation for shade. Commissioner Kaptur stated
that the location is a popular one for waiting passengers, but the
shelter is not a necessity. Commissioner Curtis noted that the shelter
is on private property and if the developer wants to construct it, it
would be acceptable.
M/S/C (Curtis/Kaptur; Whitney dissented; Olsen absent; Hough abstained)
taking the following actions:
North elevation:
1. That glass block be used in conjunction with a solid wall as a
backdrop.
October 22, 1986 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 5
ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA
CASE 3.960. (Continued)
2. That the glass block be lighted.
3. That the pilaster on the walls be widened to extend beyond the
columns.
4. That the openings be retained in the canopy area.
5. That the area in front of the north elevation have 50% sidewalk
and 50% landscaping.
Bus Shelter:
Approved as requested by the applicant.
Garden Center:
1. That the columns be full in design and 16" square in size.
2. That all recommendations of the Development Committee be met.
NOTE: Commissioner Whitney dissented because she felt that the revised
plans were far different from the original approval .
CASE 3.989. Application by CARPETERIA for architectural approval of revised
elevations for commercial building on N. Palm Canyon Drive between
Yorba/Alvarado, C-1 and R-G-A6 Zones, Section 3.
Planner (Vankeeken) presented the project.
M/S/C (Hough/Neel ; Olsen absent) approving the application subject to
the following conditions:
1. That the screed lines on the south elevation be deleted.
2. That the planter at the east entrance be increased in size.
3. That the tile on the south elevation be returned using a hip roof.
4. That the plaster mass (roof) be deleted.
5. That the landscape plans be restudied to include the following:
a. The Bottle Trees to be 15 gallon and 24" box size.
b. That vines/shrubs be added to the east wall in the parking
lot.
C. That more trees be provided.
d. That the sizes of the trees be upgraded and integrated with
the building design.
1
October 22, 1986 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 6
PUBLIC HEARINGS
CASE 5.0400-ZTA (Continued) . Initiation by the CITY OF PALM SPRINGS of
revisions to Zoning Orainance (all sections).
Commission response to written comments on Draft Negative Declaration;
final approval . No comments received. )
Recommendation: That the Commission continued the item to
November 26.
Planning Director stated that staff is developing dialogue in response
to concerns of the Tribal Council , that a meeting date with the Tribal
Council had not been established, but could Dossibly at the November 19
study session, and could include the City Council . He requested that the
Commission thoroughly review the revised ordinances so in the future
there are no surprises such as seemed to be the case when shading of
parking lots was discussed at the October study session. He recommended
a continuance to November 26 and stated that staff would be available to
discuss the revisions with any of the Commissioners.
Commissioner Whitney and Kaptur requested appointments to review the
changes.
Chairman declared the hearing open. There being no appearances the
hearing was closed.
Chairman recommended that the Commissioners read each section thoroughly
and write down questions, because of the vital importance of the Zoning
Ordinance as it relates to the General Plan.
M/S/C (Kaptur/Whitney; Olsen absent) continuing the Zoning Ordinance
Text Amendment to November 26.
CASE 5.0418-CUP. Application by CHRIS MILLS for Mark Hastings for a condi-
tional use permit to allow a preschool day care center for 48 children
on Racquet Club Road between Farrell Drive/Cerritos Road, R-1-C Zone,
Section 1.
(Environmental assessment; tentative approval . )
Recommendation: That the Commission order the preparation of a Draft
Negative Declaration, give tentative approval , and continue the applica-
tion to November 12 for written response to the preparation of the Draft
Negative Declaration.
Planner (Vankeeken) presented the staff report, and stated that there
has been some objection from the neighbors.
Discussion ensued on parking. In response to Commission question
Planning Director stated that staff's recommendation was the circular
driveway since the condition seems to be one of driving through rather
than parking and leaving cars to take the children into the day care
center. Commissioner Whitney stated that there will be a back-up of
autos if 48 children are dropped off and this might affect traffic.
October 22, 1986 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 7
PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued)
CASE 5.0418-CUP. (Continued)
in
Planning Director stated that/ previous experiences with other centers,
drop-offs and pick-ups are staggered and no complaints have ever been
received although Racquet Club Road has more traffic than streets on
which other centers are located.
Chairman declared the hearing open.
C. Mills, 121 S. Palm Canyon, project architect, requested that the
requirement for undergrounding utilities be waived since there are no
undergrounded utilities in the area. He stated that the applicant would
plan to underground the utilities to the building from the main line.
Planning Director stated that ordinance requirements require under-
grounding, but a single lot could be under at covenant to underground in
the future when more development takes place.
Mr. Mills requested that the condition for landscaping before issuance
of building permits be changed to the ability to present landscape plans
during construction as is normally done, and the provision to place all
the equipment outside of the setback area deleted since it would place
equipment within 15 ft. of the building which is not desirable. He
requested that a 10 ft. rather than a 15 ft. setback be allowed in the
rear as in the sideyards. He stated that a hedge, which will eventually
grow to 9 to 10 ft. in height will screen the equipment within a few
years, and that most children will attend either morning or afternoon
(not both) , and that 48 cars would not be coming and going at the same
time. He stated that the operation is on a monthly basis with children
coming in at different times during the day.
Chairman requested a show of hands of those in opposition to the pro-
ject; several people in the audience raised their hands.
G. Werchal , 2279 Racquet Club Road, stated that in the six years that he
has lived on Racquet Club there have been at least six serious accidents
because Racquet Club Road is a speedway. He stated that the center will
be dangerous to the children, the drivers, and the property owner, that
one of the other centers which his son attended is on a side street with
on-street parking, and that parents using - the center still had to be
careful . He stated that there is both commercial and passenger traffic
on Racquet Club and accidents will occur.
A. Osborne, 2315 Del Lago, property owner abutting the northside of the
day care center, stated that Racquet Club is a heavily traveled street
and there is difficulty accessing Racquet Club presently, with the set-
backs the playground area will be very close to her back door and that
the privacy of her pool area will be lost. She stated that the area is
residential not commercial in character and that the day care center
should be located in a commercial area since its location in a
residential area would be detrimental to property values. She stated
that the location is below the flight path of the airport and low flying
aircraft. She complained that there could be 48 children in the morning
and 48 in the afternoon and that the lot is not an appropriate one for
the use.
October 22, 1986 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 8
PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued)
CASE 5.0418-CUP. (Continued)
Mrs. K. Burdick, of Del Lago, also voiced opposition stating that she
agreed with Mrs. Osborne's comments and that it is a dangerous location
for a day care center. She stated that there are other day care centers
in the area, and, that another one is not needed.
B. McDonald, owner of the Monkey Tree Hotel on Racquet Club Road voiced
opposition stating noise will be a factor and will disturb his quiet
clientele, that his hotel business is based on peace and quiet, that his
hotel is grandfathered into a R-1 Zone and surrounding uses should not
be more intensive that R-1, that in his experience with children being
cared for at a neighboring house, there was much noise and dogs barked
constantly, and that after talking to the neighbor the use ceased. He
stated that if the use were approved, in order for his hotel to continue
operating there would have to be screening of the noise of the children
such as a line of sight barrier wall . He stated that parking will be a
problem since overflow parking will crowd his lot and exclude his guests
from their parking spaces. He stated that some resolution of the
parking problem would be necessary, that in his location cars sometimes
do not navigate the curve on Racquet Club and land on his and adjoining
properties. He stated that he approves of development such as the
neighboring church and residences, but that development should be
beneficial not detrimental . He requested that the use be reviewed in
conjunction with R-1 uses.
Mrs. J. Mallory, 2245 Racquet Club, nearby resident, stated that she
understood the need for child care since she is a single parent, but
that the proposal is commercial and should not be in a residential area
because of noise and traffic. She stated she would not have bought her
home if the area had not been R-1 and that the rules of the game should
not be changed. She stated that the zoning allows day care in a resi-
dential neighborhood under a Conditional Use Permit and that Airports,
Amusement Parks and Circusesare also allowed in this type of zoning
which amazes her. She requested that the Commission be sensitive to the
wishes of the neighbors.
C. Mills (rebuttal ) stated that the applicant is being sensitive to the
neighborhood and in reviewing parking with the Traffic Engineer there
were no problems with the design, and that a hedge will be planted
around the property and will grow fairly high for screening. He stated
that a 6-foot wall will be constructed around the entire property except
for the street side, that the use is a pre-school not a day care center
with a structured environment, that there will be only 12 children
outside at a time, that based on the parking design the location is
appropriate and if there were any other suggestions to solve problems he
and the applicant would be receptive. In reply to Chairman' s question,
he stated that the children will not all be outside at one time in order
to lessen noise impacts.
There being no further appearances, chairman declared the hearing
closed.
Planning Director stated that the lots are large in the area because of
re-zoning in the 1970's, that the Monkey Tree Hotel and apartments in
October 22, 1986 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 9
PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued)
CASE 5.0418-CUP. (Continued)
the area are not conforming and can continue 30-years before conversion,
that the CUP will be sent to the City Council for action, and that the
use can be allowed under a Conditional Use Permit in any zone in the
City.
Commissioner Kaptur stated that he was concerned about the noise and
felt that the use should be in a commercial or industrial zone, unless
the children did not go outside which is not healthful for them.
Commissioner Whitney agreed.
Planning Director stated that there have been no complaints regarding
noise from any of the day care centers in the City and that most of them
are adjacent to R-1 Zone lots. He stated that occasionally there are
some parking impacts, that the use would be under a Conditional Use
Permit and noise could be reviewed in case of complaints, and the number
of children outside can be controlled and problems mitigated.
Commissioner Whitney stated that safety is an issue because of ingress
and egress to Racquet Club Road and that if her concern could be
alleviated she might change her mind.
Commissioner Curtis asked if there could be a right-in and right-out
condition imposed. Planning Director stated that the Traffic Engineer
has no concerns with the driveway as proposed since cars have the oppor-
tunity to move out of the traffic lane and make turning movements. In
reply to Commission question, he stated that children cannot come from
the back of the building to the front unobserved, and that hours of
operation are 7 to 6 during the week (no weekends).
Commissioner Kaptur stated that neighborhood schools have been in
existence for many years and persons buying into the neighborhood know
about them prior to purchasing homes, but in the subject case persons
did not know that a day care center could be in the neighborhood. He
stated that the applicant will expend much money on the project and it
would be difficult to rescind the Conditional Use Permit if complaints
occurred, because of the project's expense, and the neighbors will have
to endure the problem.
Commissioner Curtis stated that there might be a problem also with the
proximity to the airport flight path.
M/S/C (Kaptur/Neel ; Olsen absent) denying the CUP application.
October 22, 1986 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 10
PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued)
CASE 5.0416-CUP. Application by CHRIS MILLS for US Sprint for a conditional
�..� use permit to allow a prefabricated building to house an unmanned
switching station on N. Indian Avenue between Radio/Las Vegas Roads, C-
M Zone, Section 34.
(Environmental assessment; tentative approval . )
Recommendation: That the Commission order the preparation of a Draft
Negative Declaration; tentatively approve the application; and continue
the case to November 12 for Commission response to written comments on
the Draft Negative Declaration.
Planner (Williams) presented the project on the board stating that the
AAC recommended that the landscape plans be considered as final because
of their completeness.
Chairman declared the hearing open.
C. Mills, 121 S. Palm Canyon, project architect, stated that the chain
link fence proposed on the north_ e.nd street elevations will be
screened, by a meandering staggered row of oleanders which will grow
over the six foot height of the fence. He requested that the
Development Committee condition to provide on-site parking be deleted
since the project is not being approved as a parking lot. He also
requested that the condition for decomposed granite (DG) be deleted
since the area is not irrigated and there is no need for DG to keep
weeds down, and that maintenance will be provided. He stated that there
is no blowsand problem in the area and requested that the condition to
provide turf block to sustain the weight of fire trucks be deleted since
the station is unmanned, the building is fireproof, and can be reached
by hoses because of the small lot.
In reply to Chairman' s question about the boilerplate conditions of the
Development Committee, Planning Director stated that DG prohibits plant
growth if properly compacted. Planner stated that the zone on the large
lot to the west is R-2.
Planning Director stated that the AAC recommended approval of the chain
link fence if it were screened and landscaped.
M/S/C (Kaptur/Curtis; Olsen absent) ordering the preparation of a Draft
Negative Declaration tentatively approving CUP 5.0416, and comtinuing
the case to November 12 for Commission response to written comments on
the Draft Negative Declaration.
PUBLIC COMMENTS - NONE.
October 22, 1986 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 11
ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL ITEMS
Approval of architectural cases is valid for two years. The approval granted
must be exercised within that time period unless extended.
CASE 3.0118 (MINOR) . Application by HARVEY KATOFSKY for Cafe Mahvalous for
arc ni ec ura approval of outdoor dining area at the Desert Fashion
Plaza, N. Palm Canyon Drive, PD-147, Section 15.
Planner (Green) stated that the AAC recommended restudy because of the
odd angle of the wall at the mall entrance, which created dead space,
the untidiness of the busing station at the proposed location, and the
small planters which precluded the use of ficus. He stated that since
the AAC meeting the applicants have submitted revised plans addressing
all concerns of the AAC.
M/S/C (Kaptur/Curtis; Olsen absent) approving the application as revised
in response to AAC concerns: the busing station location is now moved
inside, the angle of the wall is revised to eliminate the awkward space,
and the planter is revised to a stepped design.
CASE 3.0124 (MINOR) . Application by TENEN COOPER COMPANY for architectural
approval of-deviation from approved sign program for sign at 1111
Tahquitz Way, C-1-AA Zone (IL), Section 14.
Planner (Williams) stated that the applicant had withdrawn the applica-
tion. (No action was necessary) .
CASE 3.0103. Application by HAROLD PALLVINY for architectural approval of
revised plans for single family hillside residence on Ridge Road/El
Camino Way, R-1-C Zone, Section 27.
Planner (Vankeeken) presented the project and stated that the applicant
has some questions about the Development Committee conditions.
Mrs. L. Pallviny, the applicant, requested deletion of the Fire Depart-
ment condition to install a fire hydrant on Ridge Road since water lines
are only 4 inches and are of insufficient size for firefighting. She
requested that a covenant be allowed for future fire hydrant
installation when larger water lines are installed. She also requested
that the requirement to provide a sprinkler system be deleted because
the installation would not integrate with the types of beams proposed.
Chairman stated that the Planning Commission does not have the option to
waive Fire Department requirements, and that the new residential fire
sprinklers are well designed and not expensive.
In reply to Commission question, Planner stated that the AAC had no
comments on the wood deck.
Commissioner Kaptur stated that the AAC recommended revisions to the
southwest corner whose design does not integrate with the
architecture of the house, but that the staff can review the condition
and if not comfortable, bring it back to the Commission.
M/S/C (Kaptur/Neel ; Olsen absent) approving the application subject to
the following conditions:
October 22, 1986 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 13
COMMISSION REPORTS, REQUESTS AND DISCUSSION.
Andreas Cove Country Club (Case 5.0258-PD-145). Commission will review
`-- final plans for Andreas Cove Country Club, which is now being processed
by the County.
AAC Membership. New Commissioners Whitney, Olsen and Hough will serve
rotating assignments on the AAC. Architect Will Kleindienst was
appointed to the AAC effective immediately to fill the vacancy of James
Cioffi .
ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL ITEMS (Continued)
CASE 3.0121 (MINOR). Application by CASA CODY for architectural approval for
renovation o existing property and buildings to be operated as a hotel
at 175 Cahuilla Road, R-3 Zone, Section 15.
Planner (Williams) described the changes in the building stating that
the AAC recommends approval and noting that the building is on the his-
torical list and has some historical significance.
M/S/C (Curtis/Neel ; Olsen absent) approving the application subject to
the following conditions:
1. That the wall color be the medium shade of peach (4281W) and that
the trim (doors/windows only) be the medium aqua (4954D) .
2. That a landscape, lighting and irrigation plan be submitted for
review by AAC.
3. That the perimeter stucco wall at the entry be repainted to match
the wall colors.
4. That all recommendations of the Development Committee be met.
CASE 3.0085. Application by MARK BLAICH CONSTRUCTION for architectural
approval for revised plans for a 4-unit apartment building at Junipero
Street and San Marco, R-2 Zone, Section 3.
Planner (Williams) presented the case and stated that the applicants are
requesting continuance to discuss the restudy recommendation with the AAC
since they were unable to attend the October 20 AAC meeting.
M/S/C (Kaptur/Hough; Olsen absent) continuing the application to November
12.
CASE 3.0097 (MINOR) . Application by CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATES for American
Divie—r—sTiMe-TTapital Corp. for architectural approval of revised plans to
modify front elevation and entry designations and new signage at the
Courtyard, 777 E. Tahquitz Way, C-1AA Zone, Section 14.
Planner (Williams) presented the case stating that the changes to the
exterior are a fulfillment of Planning Commission conditions for the
theater and courtyard, but that the applicant has revised the plans since
they were approved in September 1986. She stated that the pine green
October 22, 1986 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 12
ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL ITEMS (Continued)
CASE 3.0103. (Continued)
1. That the lower level of the southwest corner be restudied (bath-
room area). (Details to be reviewed by staff, and returned to the
Commission if necessary. )
2. That the exposed beams be larger (6x).
3. That the roof tile be flashed or multi-colored.
4. That all recommendations of the Development Committee be met.
MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS
CASE 3.0113 (MINOR) Continued. Initiation by CITY OF PALM SPRINGS for a
review of standards or tree sizes in conjunction with parking lot
shading requirements.
M/S/C (Kaptur/Whitney; Olsen absent) continuing the application to
November 26 to be reviewed in conjunction with the revised Zoning
Ordinance.
CASE 5.0411-MISC. (Continued) . Planning Commission review of Draft EIR for
the Riverside County edevelopment Agency of projects in the City's
Sphere of Influence.
Planning Director stated that staff has not been able to schedule a
meeting with the County Redevelopment staff and recommended that the
item be continued to November 12.
M/S/C (Curtis/Whitney; Olsen absent) continuing the item to November 12.
CASE 5.0420-MISC. (Continued). Planning Commission review of Commission
Annual Report for FY 19ST/86.
Planning Director stated that graphics are not finished on the report
and recommended continuation to November 12.
M/S/C (Kaptur/Curtis; Olsen absent) continuing the item to November 12.
CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS. Update of City Council actions.
League of California Cities. Council is attending league meeting and
t ere was no study session on October 14.
South Palm Canyon Specific Plan. Meeting has been scheduled for
November 1th staff and members of the Tribal Council although the
Tribal Council chairman will be out of town.
October 22, 1986 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 14
ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL ITEMS (Continued)
CASE 3.0097 (MINOR) . (Continued)
color of the tile band is proposed to be changed to aqua and that the
columns with glass block and stucco are proposed to be freestanding from
the main building, although the Commission approved the columns connected
to the fascia with the interior columns only being freestanding. She
stated that the AAC vote for the freestanding columns was 4-2.
Planning Director stated that the current owner realizes that the center
has an identity crisis.
Chairman stated that the applicant is trying to create activity on Tah-
quitz, but that there is no parking along that street.
Planning Director stated that pedestrian activity will increase because
of the theater, hotel , and convention center, and that the showcasing
will present less of an office appearance to the building. He stated
that before the ban on neon signs, staff had suggested a wall on Tahquitz
with a band of neon script to change the appearance.
Chairman questioned whether or not the columns should be attached to the
building since if the changes do not attract customers to the center, the
applicants may want to remove the columns.
In reply to Commission question, Planning Director stated that the
Commission is approving the changes made to the approved conditions of
September 1986. Planner indicated that the approval would be for
deletion of two walls, change of the color of the tile band and for
freestanding columns. She explained that the working drawings of the
showcase design would be returned to the Commission for review.
Discussion continued on the glass block and stucco columns. Planning
Director stated that the AAC recommendation was that the columns be free-
standing, but that staff thought it would be better to connect them, and
a better solution could probably be found. Planner stated that staff
feels that the showcases should be an integral part of the building.
Chairman suggested that the applicant find a way to connect the columns,
but that the plan should be returned to the Commission showing a suitable
connection.
M/S/C (Curtis/Hough; Kaptur abstained; Olsen absent) approving the
revisions subject to the following conditions:
1. That a sample of the paint color be submitted with the glass block
during the review (by AAC and Planning Commission) of working
drawings.
2. That the applicant design the glass block and stucco columns to con-
nect to the building.
3. That all recommendations of the Development Committee be met.
I
I
i
October 22, 1986 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 15
COMMISSION REPORTS, REQUESTS AND DISCUSSIONS. (Continued)
- Water Symposium, October 17 at the Pavilion. Interesting, information
symposium with excellent and knowledgable speakers, several new plant
varieties that are adaptable to the desert were shown. Staff will obtain
a copy of the slide presentation to show the Commission. Water
efficiency of desert landscape can probably be improved. Landscape
architects and designers showed effective techniques with rock gardens
and striated rock patterns.
- December 24 Plannini Commission Meeting. December 24 is a holiday for
the City. eeting will be cance a and upcoming agendaswill be enlarged
as much as possible to accommodate projects.
- Water Task Force. Group appointed by the City Council . DWA and
Coachella Valley Water Districts have supplied the City Council with a
slightly different perspective on some of the issues, one of the members
of the committee was at the water symposium urging water conservation and
stating that rebuttal to the water agencies will be prepared by the task
force members. No new direction given to staff by Council . Task Force
was a fact finding (not an action) task force. Staff will keep
Commission posted.
- Revenue Bonds. Council passed resolutions to institute bonding to allow
investigation of the use of industrial revenue bonds for the renovation
of the Old Desert Museum for a commercial development, and also to
investigate the use of revenue bonds for an apartment complex on S. Palm
Canyon. No final commitments have been made.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to discuss Chairman adjourned the meeting
at 4:20 p.m.
PLANNING DIRECT R
MDR/ml
WP/PC MINS
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
Council Chamber, City Hall
November 12, 1986
• 1:30 p.m.
ROLL CALL F-Y 1986 - 1987
Present Present Excused Absences
Planning Commission This Meeting to Date to date
Larry Lapham, Chairman X 8 0
Hugh Curtis X 8 0
Brent Hough X 2 0
Hugh Kaptur X 7 2
Earl Neel X 6 2
Gary Olsen - 6 2
Barbara Whitney X 5 1
Staff Present
Marvin D. Roos, Planning Director
Siegfried Siefkes, Assistant City Attorney
Carol Vankeeken, Planner
Robert Green, Planner
Margo Williams, Planner
Dave Forcucci , Zoning Enforcement
Mary E. Lawler, Recording Secretary
Architectural Advisory Committee - November 10, 1986
• William Johnson Absent: Michael Buccino
Chris Mills
Gary Olsen
Tom Doczi
Barbara Whitney
Brent Hough
Will Kleindienst
Chairman called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m.
M/S/C (Hough/Neel ; Olsen absent) approving minutes of October 22 as submitted.
There were no Tribal Council comments.