Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986/09/10 - MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Council Chamber, City Hall September 1.0, 1986 1:30 P.M. ROLL CALL F-Y 1986 - 1987 Present Present Excused Absences Planning Commission This Meeting to Date to date Larry Lapham, Chairman X 5 0 Hugh Curtis X 5 0 Hugh Kaptur X 4 1 Curt Ealy X 4 1 Earl Neel X 3 2 Gary Olsen X 4 0 Barbara Whitney X 2 1 Staff Present Marvin D. Roos, Planning Director Robert Green, Planner Margo Williams, Planner Dave Forcucci , Zoning Enforcement Mary E. Lawler, Recording Secretary Architectural Advisory Committee - September 8, 1986 J. Cioffi , Chairman William Johnson Chris Mills Earl Neel Tom Doczi Chairman called the meeting to order at 1 :30 p.m. M/S/C (Olsen/Neel ; Kaptur absent) approving minute of August 27, 1986 as submitted. ADMINISTRATIVE NOTE: There were no Tribal Council comments . September 10, 1986 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 2 CONSENT AGENDA Approval of architectural cases is valid for two years. The approval granted `... must be exercised within that time period unless extended. M/S/C (Whitney/Olsen; Kaptur absent) taking the following actions: CASE 3.304. Application by TOM DOCZI for A. Guyer for architectural approval of detailed landscape plans for four, 4-unit apartments on Avenida Caballeros between Vista Chino/Cottonwood, R-2 Zone, Section 11. Approved subject to the following condition: That all recommendations of the Development Committee be implemented. Abstention: Ealy. CASE 3.758. Application by RATTNER INVESTMENTS #III for architectural approval of detailed landscape plans for a 129 unit apartment complex on Farrell Drive between Hwy Ill/Sonora Road. , R-3 Zone, Section 24. (Ref. TPM 20358. ) Restudy noting the following: 1. That additional canopy trees shall be added to the street frontages (e.g. Rhus Lancea and Schinus Molle) in lieu of Crepe Myrtle. 2. That additional tree species with varying height shall be added (e.g. Eucalyptus/evergreen trees in lieu of some of the Honey Locusts and Crepe Myrtle) . 3. That canopy trees shall be substituted for Melaleuca. 4. That large boulders and mounding be used in native planting areas. 5. That specimen species eg Ocotillo and Opuntia shall be introduced into the native planting areas . Natal Plum should also be used as a contrast. 6. That the following species be substituted with alternate more heat tolerant types; Lily of the Nile (suggest curve leaf yucca); Abelia, New Zealand Flax. 7. That bougainvillea be used on southern elevations and a substitute vine be found for bougainvillea on the northern elevation. Vines shall be espaliered to buildings throughout. Bougainvillea should be used as accents against walls on the street elevations at gate entries. 8. Restudy the use of more shade tolerant ground cover species in court areas (i .e. substitute shade tolerant species for Verbena, Gazania, Copper King, and Potentilla Verna. 9. Substitute Rosemary with species less likely to invade shrub `� areas. September 1.0, 1986 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 3 CONSENT AGENDA CASE 3.758 (Continued) 10. Provide up-lights for interior palms . 11. That screen shrub planting shall be added between units and the parking lot. 12. That shrub planting shall be added in areas where omitted between units. Abstention: Ealy. CASE 3.0088 (MINOR) . Application by NOGLE, HAWKINS, ONUFER ARCHITECTS for architectural approval of balcony details for Sundown Apartments at 400 S. Hermosa, R-2 Zone, (IL) , Section 14. Approved subject to the following conditions: 1. That the balconies be cut down to 36" including the entire balcony. 2. That the balconies be replastered to match existing with no cap detail . CASE 3.0098 (MINOR) . Application by W. L. STEVENS (COMMERCIAL LIGHTING SERVICES) for Chevron for architectural approval of revised plans for identification sign for a service station for 490 S. Indian `..�' Avenue/Ramon Road, C-2 Zone, (IL) , Section 14. Continued to September 24, 1986. CASE 3.0099 (MINOR) . Application by W. L. STEVENS (COMMERCIAL LIGHTING SERVICES) for Chevron for architectural approval of revised plans for identification sign for a service station at 100 S. El Cielo Road/Tahquitz-McCallum Way, A Zone, Section 18. Continued to September 24, 1986. CASE 3.0101 (MINOR) . Application by DUNES HOTEL for architectural approval of revised fence plans for hotel at 390 S. Indian Avenue, C-2 Zone, Section 14. Continued to September 24, 1.986 for submission of plans. CASE 7.642-AMM. Application by DEAN BERKUS for architectural approval of entry gate and driveway gate at 260 Vereda Sur, R-1-A Zone, Section 10. Approved as submitted. Commissioner Kaptur arrived at the meeting. September 10, 1.986 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 4 ITEM REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA CASE 3.944 (MINOR) . Application by VALENTINE HOTEL for architectural approval �..� of detailed landscape plans and revised elevations for hotel at 2095 N. Indian Avenue, R-3 Zone, Section 3. Planner (Green) presented the project and showed the revisions made to the plans during construction. He stated that the AAC recommended revision of the file roof area, the bridge, and the battered walls;,, and that the applicant disagreed with the recommendations and wished to present his case. C. Jensen, applicant, Garden Grove, stated that he wished to address AAC concerns as follows: The fascia was revised to a flat surface with contrasting colors to avoid the cost of placing lines on the fascia; the landscaping was proposed to screen the corner of the building; the tile roof into the parapet was to direct water during the rainy season. He stated that there is an existing condition of a staircase to the roof on the back of the second level which was never indicated by the previous architect and that there is a domed building and windwall for privacy for living quarters on the second level . He requested that the new roof (on which permits have been obtained) be considered "as built" although the owner will remove any items that the Commission requires. He stated that he had not addressed the AAC regarding these concerns because the owner was not available for direction, and that he would like to proceed as soon as possible with the project. Commissioner Kaptur stated that there is too much involved to take quick action, and that perhaps the Building Division could issue permits for other phases while a restudy of the project is undertaken. M/S/C (Kaptur/Curtis;) for a restudy of the architecture and landscaping per AAC recommendations as follows: Architecture 1. That the tile roofed area be revised. 2. That the bridge be revised. 3. That the battered walls on the mechanical enclosures be revised. Landscaping 1. That landscape masses be added to screen the A.C. units (ea Natal Plum, Nerium Oleander, Xylosma) . 2. That Chamerops palm may be used in lieu of Sago palms. 3. That the spacing and species of Hibiscus be restudied. Chairman explained to the applicant that the AAC should hear the applicant's appeal , and that the Commission rarely overrides the Committee. Planning Director stated that he would work with the applicant to expedite progress of the project. September 10, 1986 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 5 ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL ITEMS Approval of architectural cases is valid for two years. The approval granted must be exercised within that time period unless extended. CASE 3.0092 (MINOR)-Continued. Application by FAIRMONT SIGNS for K-Mart for architectural approval of main identification sign for business in existing shopping center on the southwest corner of Farrell Drive/Tahquitz-McCallum Way, C-S-C Zone, Section 13. Zoning Enforcement Officer stated that the application is for two main identification signs (on the south and east elevations) and that the applicant after a restudy has submitted plans conforming in appearance to the existing Vons and Thrifty signs. M/S/C (Curtis/Kaptur;) approving the application as submitted. CASE 3.856. Application by LUCINDA ROMANO for architectural approval of revised plans for four-plex on Cottonwood Road between Vista Chino/Chuckwalla Road, R-2 Zone, Section 11. Planner (Green) stated that the applicant has revised the plans addressing issue of the site plan, orientation, and architecture expressed by the AAC at the August 25 meeting, but that the Committee has not seen plans revised after the September 8 meeting. He stated in reply to Commission question that the oddly shaped details on the fascia are stucco popouts. M/S/C (Kaptur/Ealy) approving the application subject to the following: Approved subject to: 1. That accents shall be added to the two central windows in the north elevation. 2. That gable roofs be added throughout. 3. That working drawings be submitted-. 4. That the AAC review the revised elevations submitted after the September 8 meeting. Landscaping restudied noting: 1. That an olive be added in lieu of ficus. 2. That continuity of species be introduced into the plan. 3. That the position of plants be revised to improve maintenance. 4. That shade species shall be used in shaded areas. September 1.0, 1986 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 6 PUBLIC HEARINGS CASE 5.0400-ZTA (Continued) . Initiation by the CITY OF PALM SPRINGS of revisions to the Zoning Ordinance (all sections) . (Commission response to written comments on Draft Negative Declaration. No comments received. ) Recommendation: That the item be continued to September 24, 1986 at the request of the Tribal Council . Planning Director stated that staff is preparing language to include key sections of the Indian agreement (#779) in the ordinance, including the appeals section with the agreement added as an appendix to expedite amendments. He stated that revisions are being made to allow develop- ment of smaller lots and industrial zones under specific development plans, that Indian densities, setbacks, and heights will be included in the R-4 Zone section; minor deviations between the two ordinances resolved; and standard language developed. He stated that the Tribal Council might not be in favor of more stringent standards for the C-IAA Zone. regarding open space and setbacks because the Indians have no set- backs in commercial zones, and that no additional written comment from the Tribal Council has been received as of September 10. Chairman declared the hearing open. There being no appearances, Chairman closed the hearing. M/S/C (Kaptur/Neel ) continuing the item to September 24. NOTE: In reply to Commission question, Planning Director stated that �.� the language developed in the ordinance has been in response to input from the architectural and development communities and that copies of the revised ordinance have been given to two AAC members (architects) , but no comments have been received. He stated that the ordinance has been reviewed continuously for the past five years. PUBLIC COMMENTS - None. ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL ITEMS (Continued) Approval of architectural cases is valid for two years. The approval granted must be exercised within that time period unless extended. CASE 3.0053. Application by ED KANAN for architectural approval of apartment complex on Ramon Road/Grenfall Road, R-2 Zone, Section 23. M/S/C (Curtis/Kaptur) continuing the application to September 24 at the applicant's request. CASE 5.0414-CUP (Continued) . Application by ROBERT LEMLEY/WILLIAM GARNER for architectural approval of revisions for restaurant (Jasper's) at 500 E. Palm Canyon Drive, R-3 Zone, Section 23. M/S/C (Ealy/Kaptur) continuing the application to September 24 at the applicants' request. September 10, 1986 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 7 ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL ITEMS (Continued) CASE 3.0094 (MINOR) . Application by WESSMAN DEVELOPMENT for architectural .. approval of additional parking lot lights at Las Palmas Medical Plaza on the southwest corner of Tachevah Way/Via Miraleste, PD-72, Section 11. M/S/C (Olsen/Neel ; Ealy/Kaptur abstained) approving the application subject to the following conditions: 1. That the standards shall be located at the intersection of parking stripes. 2. That the base detailing shall be compatible with the detailing of the existing buildings . CASE 3.0097 (MINOR) . Application by DAVID CHRISTIAN for American Diversified Capital Corp. for architectural approval of revisions to the Tahquitz elevation, entry designations, and new signs at for retail center 1777 E. Tahquitz Way, C-1-AA Zone, Section 14. (Ref. Case 3.309) Planning Director stated that the Bank of Palm Springs has been trying to solve its identity crisis by signing along the Tahquitz frontage with the last major attempt being burgundy awnings at the two entries, which were approved by the Commission with the condition that plans for remodeling of the frontage to coordinate colors and materials be returned to the Commission for review. He described the revisions as a series of freestanding glass block and plaster columns with showcases and landscaping located behind the sidewalk and Epoxy paint in dark green over the orange tile band on the building. He stated that the dark green color could be lighter, that the appearance is art deco and the columns are internally lit for sparkle at night to create a retail rather than an office appearance. He stated that the AAC recommended that two of the entry columns touch the building, that the showcases are two feet behind the column line, and that any color changes would be brought back for Commission review. He stated that staff will review the working drawings. Discussion ensued on the appearance of the backs of the showcases. Planning Director stated that the material is opaque but not selected at the present time, and that the rear of the case and a portion of the retaining wall will be visible. He explained that the lighting is proposed to be white. Chairman directed staff to contact the architect for a plan showing the sides and rears of the cases. M/S/C (Curtis/Olsen; Ealy/Kaptur abstained) approving the application subject to the following conditions: 1. That glass block be used instead of tile. 2. That end columns be connected to the fascia and resubmitted for staff approval . 3. That the four center columns be freestanding. 4. That the working drawings be submitted for Planning Commission review. 5. That detailed landscape, irrigation, and exterior lighting plans be submitted. 6. That plans be submitted showing sides and rears of the show cases. September 10, 1986 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 8 ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL ITEMS (Continued) CASE 3.01.02 (MINOR) . Application by ARTHUR FRIEDMAN for architectural approval of elevations for ice cream store at 170 N. Palm Canyon Drive, C-B-D Zone, Section 15. Planner (Williams) explained that the proposal is for a new retail business (ice cream store) in the passage from Palm Canyon to the Tackett Center and that the AAC recommends approval . She stated, in reply to Chairman's question, that the plans coordinate with the overall remodel of the center. M/S/C (Curtis/Olsen) approving the application subject to the following conditions: 1. That the revised master plan of the southerly walk and court shall be resubmitted for approval . 2. That the southerly closure of passageway is approved. 3. That the storefronts match in height and details. 4. That details of condition #3 shall be reviewed by staff. CASE 3.0104 (MINOR) . Request by CLASSIC SPORTSWEAR for consideration of a deviation from sign program for store at 611. S. Palm Canyon Drive (Sun Center) , PD-77, Section 22. Zoning Enforcement Officer stated that the Planning Commission pre- viously approved a sign program, which is being implemented, of a dark brown background and ivory letters for the center but that the applicant after changing his business from an appliance store to a sportswear stop has installed a new sign without permits with the reverse of the colors of the sign program. He stated that the City has ordered removal of the sign, but that the City Attorney advised that the sign be reconsidered at the Planning Commission level for acceptability to the Commission . M. Hill , 611 S. Palm Canyon Drive, the applicant, stated that the problem is his fault because he thought that the sign company had obtained the necessary permits , that he attempted to obtain a permit after being noticed by the City, but the application was denied. He requested consideration to allow the sign to remain because of the approach of the season and the costs involved in replacing it. He stated that sixteen businesses in the center have indicated that they are not offended by the sign, and that he now understands the sign program, although it was designed before he was part of the center. Commissioner Kaptur stated that the sign would be costly to remove and would not make a difference because the entire center is not aesthetically pleasing. He stated that in the future if the applicant wishes to change the sign he has to conform to the sign program. Commissioner Whitney noted that although she was in sympathy with the applicant, she felt that the sign should conform to the approved sign program. Commissioner Ealy questioned whether or not approving the sign would grant a variance. Chairman stated that if the Commission approves the application a sign would be approved that does not conform to the sign program previously approved by the Commission. September 10, 1986 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 9 ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL ITEMS (Continued) CASE 3.0104. (Continued) Commissioner Ealy stated that if the applicant's request is denied, he should seek recourse against the sign company. Mr. Hill stated that the sign company has refused to take any responsibility. M/S/C (Kaptur/Ealy) for approval of the sign. The vote was as follows: Ayes: Ealy, Kaptur Noes: Curtis , Neel , Olsen, Whitney, Lapham M/S/C (Whitney/Olsen) approving the application subject to the following condition: That the sign is approved only temporarily and is to be removed and replaced with a sign conforming to the Sun Center sign program on or before August 1. , 1987. ADMINISTRATIVE NOTE: Discussion followed on whether or not the City should fine contractors in instances where no permits are obtained. Planning Director stated that the fee can be doubled, and that the City could inform the contractor's licensing board for revocation of the licenses. Discussion continued on the problem. Commissioner Olsen suggested that the Business Licenses Division inform the applicants at the time a license is �.... issued. Planning Director stated that there are handouts and sign brochures given the applicants by this division, but in this instance the applicant was an established business person and it was probably assumed by the Business License staff that he knew the regulations since the previous sign was approved in conformance with the sign program. He stated that in this particular instance the sign company was from out of town and the sign cost less because of not paying for a permit, and that local sign companies know requirements and are cooperative. ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL ITEMS (Continued) Approval of architectural cases is valid for two years. The approval granted must be exercised within that time period unless extended. CASE 3.0105 (MINOR) . Application by FISCHER ARCHITECTS for architectural approval of exterior color change and new porte cochere for the Spa Hotel , N. Indian Avenue, C-2 and C-1-AA Zone (IL) , Section 1.4. Planner (Williams) presented the case and stated that the AAC recom- mended restudy of the porte cochere. Discussion ensued on the revisions. Chairman stated that the porte cochere has many problems besides proportions, and that the applicant may feel that changing pro- portions is sufficient but that the design of the porte cochere does not September 10, 1986 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 1.0 ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL ITEMS (Continued) CASE 3.0105. (Continued) integrate well with the building. Commissioner Whitney stated that she was concerned about the landscaping around the porte cochere. Planner stated that the AAC recommends a softer transition between the land- scaped areas for continuity. M/S/C (Whitney/Curtis) taking the following actions : 1. That the colors and balconies are approved. 2. That the landscaping is to be restudied. 3. That the porte cochere is to be redesigned in overall design and proportions. Abstention: Kaptur CASE 5.0342-MISC.-A. Initiation by the CITY OF PALM SPRINGS of architectural approval of design for expansion of DeMuth Park for 2 softball fields for park located south of Mesquite between Mountain View/Vella Road, W- R-1C Zone, Section 19. Planning Director described the project, stated that the Community Services Division is emphasizing softball and that the soccer fields are to be relocated and softball fields added. He stated that the AAC recommended berming around the fields, and that staff would recommend a strong tree form such as Eucalyptus around the entire lighted portion of the park to mitigate the lights. He stated that the City could probably work with the center to change the configuration of one of the fields slightly since there is access through the Youth Center Drive, and that no bleachers are proposed because of long-term maintenance and liability. Commissioner Olsen suggested stepped berming similar to that of the Oasis Water Park. Planning Director stated that the Commission could make the size of the soccer fields a condition of approval . M/S/C (Whitney/Olsen) approving the application subject to the following conditions. 1. That more berming be provided for spectator seating for fields one and two. 2. That the new soccer fields be at least the same size as the existing. 3. That berming be stepped around the baseball fields. 4. That a tree program around the perimeter of the lighted fields be submitted. September 10, 1986 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 11 COMMISSION REPORTS, REQUESTS AND DISCUSSION. - Commissioner Kaptur asked that action be taken on the removal of dumpsters from the street at the side of the Sheraton Hotel . Zoning Enforcement Officer explained the City has only recently become aware of the problem and is taking steps to have the dumpsters removed. Commissioner Curtis requested that the broken, taped windows of car agencies on N. Indian Avenue be investigated. Planning Commission study session. September 17 from 3 to 5 p.m. in the Large Conference Room, City Hall . Agenda Items: Vineyard overall design and concept; development proposal at E. Palm Canyon/Araby Drive, east of Hershels Deli including frontage road options; and the architectural review process. - AAC appointment: M/S/C (Kaptur/Whitney) appointing Michael Buccino, local landscape architect, to the AAC effective September 22, 1986 for a three year period. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS CASE 3.0106. Application by CITY OF PALM SPRINGS for architectural approval of building addition to Village Green to house Country Store, S. Palm Canyon Drive, C-B-D Zone, Section 15 . (Environmental Assessment. ) Planning Director stated that the AAC recommended restudy of the archi- tecture. M/S/C (Kaptur/Olsen) ordering the preparation of a Draft Negative Declaration, and continuation of the case to September 24. M/S/C (Curtis/Neel ) for restudy of the architecture noting the following: 1. That the structure have continuity of design. 2. That the structures be tied visually with other structures on the site. 3. That the design be adjusted to complement the site. CASE 3.807 (MINOR) . Application by IMPERIAL SIGNS for the City of Palm Springs for architectural approval of graphics for entry sign on N. Palm Canyon Drive, west of Tram Way, UR Zone, Section 4. September 10, 1986 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 12 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS (Continued) CASE 3.P07. (Continued) M/S/C (Curtis/Neel ) approving the application subject to the following conditions: 1. That a revised color shall be used for the sign (suggestion of a gold finish) . 2. That the mounting hardware be concealed. CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS. Update of City Council Actions. No report given. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to discuss, Chairman adjourned the meeting at 3:05 p.m. Planning i rector MDR/ml WP/PC MIN PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Council Chamber, City Hall September 24, 1986 1:30 p.m. ROLL CALL F-Y 1986 - 1987 Present Present Excused Absences Planning Commission This Meeting to Date to date Larry Lapham, Chairman X 5 0 Hugh Curtis X 5 0 Hugh Kaptur X 4 1 Curt Ealy - 4 2 Earl Neel X 3 2 Gary Olsen X 4 0 Barbara Whitney X 2 1 Staff Present Marvin D. Roos, Planning Director Siegfried Siefkes, Assistant City Attorney Carol Vankeeken, Planner Douglas Evans, Planner Robert Green, Planner Margo Williams, Planner Dave Forcucci , Zoning Enforcement Mary E. Lawler, Recording Secretary Architectural Advisory Committee - September 22, 1986 J. Cioffi , Chairman William Johnson Chris Mills Gary Olsen Tom Doczi Barbara Whitney Chairman called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. M/S/C (Neel/Olsen; Ealy absent) approving minutes of September 10, 1986 as submitted.