Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986/08/27 - MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Council Chamber, City Hall August 27, 1986 1:30 p.m. ROLL CALL F-Y 1986 - 1987 Present Present Excused Absences Planning Commission This Meeting to Date to date Larry Lapham, Chairman X 4 0 Hugh Curtis X 4 0 Hugh Kaptur - 3 1 Curt Ealy X 3 1 Earl Neel X 2 2 Gary Olsen X 3 0 Barbara Whitney X 1 1. Staff Present Siegfried Siefkes , Assistant City Attorney Douglas Evans, Planner Robert Green, Planner Margo Williams, Planner Dave Forcucci , Zoning Enforcement Mary E. Lawler, Recording Secretary Architectural Advisory Committee - August 25, 1986 J. Cioffi , Chairman Absent: William Johnson William Johnson Chris Mills Earl Neel Tom Doczi Curt Ealy Chairman called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. M/S/C (Curtis/Neel ; Kaptur absent)) approving minutes of August 13, 1986 as submitted. ADMINISTRATIVE NOTES: There were no Tribal Council comments . Chairman welcomed new commissioner Barbara Whitney, local realtor and long time resident, stating that she will contribute a great deal to Commission deliberations. August 27, 1986 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 2 CONSENT ACTION AGENDA Approval of architectural cases is valid for two years. The approval granted must be exercised within that time period unless extended. M/S/C (Curtis/Neel ; Kaptur absent) taking the following actions : CASE 3.702 (MINOR) . Application by KAPTUR & CIOFFI for Peri-Mel 1 (Freeman Development Company) for architectural approval of project identifica- tion sign and revised landscaping for 118 unit condominium project on Avenida Caballeros between Arenas Road/Saturmino Road, R-4 (I .L.) Zone, Section 14. Approved subject to the following conditions: That the second fountain be deleted. Abstention: Ealy CASE 3.0098 (MINOR) . Application by W. L. STEVENS (COMMERCIAL LIGHTING SERVICE) for Chevron for architectural approval of identification sign for station at 490 S. Indian Avenue at Ramon, C-2 Zone (I .L.) , Section 14. Restudy noting that the existing sign is one of quality design and that the sign replacement should be at least of equal quality. (Also land- scape plans must be submitted for staff approval . ) CASE 3.0099 (MINOR) . Application by W. L. STEVENS (COMMERCIAL LIGHTING SERVICE) for Chevron for architectural approval of identification sign v for gasoline station at 100 S. El Cielo Road/Tahquitz-McCallum Way, A Zone, Section 18. Restudy noting that the existing sign is one of quality design and that the sign replacement should be at least of equal quality. (Also land- scape plans must be submitted for staff approval .) CASE 3.0100 (MINOR) . Application by W. L. STEVENS (COMMERCIAL LIGHTING SERVICE) for Chevron for architecture approval of identification sign for gasoline station at 300 N. Indian Avenue at Amado Road, C-2 Zone (I .L. ) , Section 14. Approved subject to the following conditions: 1. That the sign be centered on the monument. 2. That the Juniper and Agapanthus be deleted and "Boxwood Beauty" natal plum and annual color be substituted. CASE 3.0088 (MINOR) . Application by NOGLE, HAWKINS, ONUFER, ARCHITECTS for architectural approval of minor revisions to exterior of Sundown Apart- ments , 400 S. Hermosa, R-2 Zone (IL) , Section 14. Approved subject to the following conditions : 1.. That the stairwell and balconies be restudied and that a section be provided (eliminate wood cap) . August 27, 1986 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 3 CONSENT ACTION AGENDA CASE 3.0088 (MINOR) . (Continued) 2. That the window in the recreation building be recessed a minimum of 6" . 3. That the half circle infill panels be retained, restained, and the stucco repainted. 4. That the sheet metal caps be painted out to match. 5. That the main entry revisions are approved. 6. That the sign be reviewed under separate permit. CASE 3.0101 (MINOR) . Application by DUNES HOTEL for architectural approval of fence at 390 S. Indian Avenue, C-2 Zone, Section 14. Restudy noting that landscape plans and street elevations must be pro- vided. ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL ITEMS Approval of architectural cases is valid for two years. The approval granted must be exercised within that time period unless extended. CASE 3.401-A. Application by GOLDEN HILLS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY for Jacquelyn Davies for architectural approval of second story addition and color change for existing residence at 3295 Tigertail Lane, R-1-A Zone, Section 25. M/S/C (Curtis/Olsen; Kaptur absent) approving the application subject to the following condition: That the final colors be reviewed informally by the AAC. CASE 3.888. Application by W. HOWLETT for Vineyard Limited Partnership for architectural approval of revised awning program for existing shopping center on S. Palm Canyon Drive, south of Tahquitz Way, CBD Zone, Section 15. M/S/C (Curtis/Ealy; Kaptur absent) continuing the application to September 24. (To be reviewed at September 17 study session) . CASE 3.0058 (MINOR) (Continued) . Application by GOLDEN STATE SIGNS for architectural approval of revised main identification sign for Cafe Mahvalous in the Desert Fashion Plaza, N. Palm Canyon Drive, CBD Zone, Section 15. M/S/C (Curtis/Ealy; Kaptur absent) continuing (removing from the agenda) the item pending receipt of revised plans . CASE 5.0414-CUP (Continued). Application by ROBERT LEMLEY/WILLIAM GARNER for architectural approval of revisions for restaurant (Jasper's) at 500 E. Palm Canyon Drive, R-3 Zone, Section 23. August 27, 1986 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 4 ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL ITEMS (Continued) CASE 5.0414-CUP. (Continued) Planner presented the project, and stated that the applicant proposes an extension for the restaurant, outdoor dining areas, and enclosure of the glass wall with a stucco and rock wall which includes small windows . He stated that the AAC and the Commission visited the site and that the applicant had submitted revised plans which the AAC has seen eliminating the rock walls, except for planters (which are acceptable to the AAC) . He explained that the AAC felt the original design has a relationship between the interior and exterior spaces but the proposed stucco walls dilluted the original architectural concept. The committee also felt that there should be a stronger link between outdoor and indoor dining areas. AAC also suggested revisions to the porte-cochere and column element. He stated that the committee felt that if the design concept were to enclose the building there should be more substantial changes in the rest of the architecture also, to complement this design change. M/S/C (Olsen/Whitney; Kaptur absent) for a restudy noting the following: 1. The AAC noted that the original building was designed to have a strong relationship between interior and exterior spaces. The proposed remodel with stucco walls and random fenestration eliminates this relationship and is not, therefore, complimentary to the design of the building. 2. The proposed outdoor dining area should have a stronger visual and floor plan link with the interior. AAC noted that there seems to be no relationship between the indoor and outdoor dining areas in the current design. Outdoor dining areas result in a reduction of landscaping. 3. That the porte-cochere be revised - (column element; point of connection of porte cochere to roof) . 4. AAC noted that more substantial changes in the architecture may be necessary to achieve a satisfactory remodel . 5. AAC noted that the rock facing on the planter walls only was acceptable. CASE 3.0092 (MINOR) . Application by FAIRMONT SIGNS for K-Mart for architec- tural approval of main identification sign for business in existing shopping center on the southwest corner of Farrell Drive/Tahquitz- McCallum Way, CSC Zone, Section 13. M/S/C (Curtis/Neel ; Kaptur absent) continuing the application to September 10 for review of recently submitted revised plans . CASE 3.960. Application by PALM SPRINGS MALL for reconsideration of metal flashing on the roof wall of an existing shopping center on the north- west corner of Tahquitz-McCallum Way/Farrell Drive, CDN Zone, Section 18. Planner (Williams) stated that the applicants wished to place metal flashing (similar to that on Von' s) on the roof because of difficulty August 27, 1986 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 5 ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL ITEMS (Continued) CASE 3.960. (Continued) with existing panels of the building and have agreed to the AAC condi- tions. M/S/C (Curtis/Olsen; Kaptur absent) approving application subject to the following conditions: 1. That the metal flashing is acceptable as a parapet trim throughout and is to be a heavy gauge (22 or greater) . 2. That split face block is acceptable for the freestanding refuse enclosures . CASE 3.0070. Application by DONALD E. WILLIAMS for architectural approval of warehouse and office complex on the corner of Eugene Road/Calle San Raphael , M-1 Zone, Section 19. M/S/C (Curtis/Whitney; Kaptur absent) approving the application subject to the following conditions: 1. That trees be added to landscape planters in parking bays . 2. That a three (3) foot planter be added adjacent to north wall of building. 3. That all mechanical equipment be screened. 4. That elevations match the existing buildings. CASE 3.0080. Application by CARMICHAEL DESIGNS (MIKE CARPENTER) for archi- tectural approval of industrial building on Tachevah Way/Montalvo Way, M-1-P Zone, Section 7. M/S/C (Neel/Ealy; Kaptur absent) for a restudy of the application noting the following: 1. That the east and north elevations need added design features. 2. That doors on the north elevation be painted to match building colors. 3. That landscape planters (with trees) be added to the north side of building. CASE 3.0085. Application by MARK BLAICH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY for architec- tural approval of 4-unit apartment building on Junipero Street/San Marco, R-2 Zone, Section 3. M/S/C (Ealy/Curtis; Kaptur absent) for a restudy of the architecture and site plan. Planner (Williams) stated that the applicant is aware of the recommend- ations. August 27, 1986 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 6 PUBLIC HEARINGS TPM 21270 (Continued) . Application by C. DUNHAM for a subdivision of land to llft� divide property pursuant to an approved development district at South Palm Canyon Drive/Murray Canyon Drive, R-2 and 0-20 Zones, Section 34. (Ref. Cases 5.0185-PD-132, 5.0308-PD-155, and TTM 16495. ) (An EIR was prepared in conjunction with the original planned develop- ment district. ) Planner (Williams) presented the project and stated that the purpose of the map is to facilitate previously approved conditions on a related map and project and that an EIR was prepared on the site master plan and map. She stated that the subject map is for an exchange of property for access rights, that several Vista Canyon homeowners had asked for a con- tinuance to meet with the applicant to discuss road alignment, and that the applicant indicates that the meeting has taken place and concerns addressed. Planner (Evans) explained that an EIR had been done previously on the other projects, that there are three 20 acre parcels, and an additional western hillside parcel zoned 0-20 from which the density will be trans- ferred to the Dunham property and the lot dedicated to the City as open space with lots surrounding it dedicated for the term of the Indian leases. He stated that the CC&R's will require that all development on the lot receive AAC and Planning Commission approval , that the EIR had taken two years to complete, that impacts from development can be miti- gated to an acceptable level , and that the density will be 9 units on 180 acres . Discussion ensued on the location of the road and previous Commission actions. Planner (Evans) stated that the road alignment was restudied twice, that the final development plan had been approved for the roadway at its present location, and that landscape plans are approved. He stated that there is R-2 Zoning on one of the 20 acre parcels, that the parcel is unusual because of steep hillside and wash conditions, and it is best to have 9 homes on the property to forestall future R-2 development. Chairman declared the hearing open. Mrs. G. Stone, 2530 LaCondesa, Vista Canyon, President of the homeowners association, objected to the proposal because although an exchange of property is being addressed, she felt that it could be the beginning of development of 10 condominiums on the site. She questioned the identity of the applicants , since the public hearing notice stated "S. Platt" and the agenda stated "C. Dunham" . Chairman stated that the application is for Mr. Dunham as a private agreement to transfer property. Mrs. Stone agreed and stated that Mr. Platt gave Mr. Dunham the land for the road in the beginning and that information from Mr. Platt indicates a ten unit hillside condo with 2.3 persons , which would add 2.3 cars, ... etc. perr unit and-that: there will be traffic problems. She stated that she was opposed to any hillside development, and if allowed, eventually there will be no mountains or deserts to view, only houses. She also August 27, 1986 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 7 PUBLIC HEARINGS TPM 21270. (Continued) objected to the holding of the public hearing in August when residents are out of town because many persons are interested in preservation of the mountains and would have attended to voice their objections . There being no further appearances, Chairman closed the hearing. Discussion followed. Chairman stated that the project had been approved previously and that property exchange is the issue the Commission is addressing. Commissioner Olsen asked if the access would increase the traffic. Planner (Evans) stated that an access easement caused concern because it was in the area of a drainage course, that the developable property is located away from the access , and that there is a large knoll which would obstruct a roadway. He stated that the location chosen was one that would cause theleast disruption' (cut and fill ) , the least amount of scarring and visibility from the City, and that there would be adequate visibility for cars approaching the intersection. He stated that the Cahuilla Hills pads, except for one, are slightly higher than the pads in the subject proposal , that any road would pass by Vista Canyon unless a portion of the hill were removed, and that the environ- mental consultant recommended the approved location. Mrs. Stone stated that the wash is a natural one and carries debris in a large storm, and that she and her neighbors cleared debris from it after the last large storm. She stated that if this wash is disturbed, the water will drain in another location. Chairman explained that the road is in its present location so it is out of the wash. Mrs. Stone explained that the homeowners were not objecting to it not being in the wash because no one could build in it, but that her point was that it is a large wash and not a small drain. Commissioner Whitney requested that she abstain because she had not pre- viously participated in discussion on the project. M/S/C (Curtis/Neel ; Kaptur absent; Whitney abstained) approving the application based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: Findings• 1. That the property is suitable for the permitted uses in the zoning district. 2. That a parcel map is in the appropriate application for the pro- posed subdivision. 3. That the proposed subdivision is consistent with the Subdivision Map Act, local Subdivision Ordinance and General Plan and condi- tions have been imposed to insure that the proposed map will not be detrimental to the health, safety or welfare of the City. August 27, 1986 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 8 PUBLIC HEARINGS TPM 21270. (Continued) Conditions • The Development Committee Conditions dated July 30, 1986 shall apply. The Planning conditions are herewith listed. 1. That a covenant or access agreement for ingress and egress be reviewed and approved by Planning Director, City Engineer, and City Attorney prior to approval of Final Map. Said agreement to contain provision for slope maintenance, restoration and con- struction paths. 2. That if slopes (cut/fill ) are located off-site an agreement shall be provided for encroachment and maintenance. 3. That the Final Map shall demonstrate or indicate the alignment of the access easement to South Palm Canyon Drive. PUBLIC COMMENTS Planner (Evans) recommended that a hotel application (Case 5.0398-PD-180 Larry Pierce Hotel ) previously approved except for architecture be reviewed informally by the Commission, since it is scheduled for Council consideration: INFORMAL REVIEW Planner (Green) described location of the hotel (across from Goodyear Tire) , stated that the Commission recommended approval of the preliminary planned development district, but restudy of the archi- tecture. Since the Commission restudied the project the applicant has revised elevations. He discussed the Commission concerns on the mass and detailing of the building and the arches and proportions of the roof. He stated that the applicant has revised the arch details and increased the roof to a full hip roof, and submitted details integrating mass into the detailing of the buildings and that he has requested an informal review prior to submission to Council . He stated that the AAC had not seen the revisions , but had recommended approval of the previous elevations . Chairman asked for confirmation that the Commission would review the architecture in final development plans and that no action would be taken although the applicant is .requesting comment. He stated that the elevations have improved. In response to a question by the Chairman the Planner stated that the application is preliminary only and that the Commission would review final development plans. The Chairman stated that the elevations had greatly improved and appeared acceptable. August 27, 1986 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 9 ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL ITEMS (Continued) Approval of architectural cases is valid for two years. The approval granted must be exercised within that time period unless extended. CASE 3.0067 (MINOR) . Application by RICHARD FISCHER for architectural approval of details of the south elevation of the Spa Hotel , 100 N. Indian Avenue, C-2 Zone (IL) , Section 14. Planner (Evans) stated that the AAC recommended restudy because of con- cern by one of the AAC members on the detail of the south elevation. He stated that staff and the AAC member met with the architect, and that the AAC member now feels that the revision is acceptable. Planner (Williams) stated that the south elevation detailing was not clear as to the ending of the stone work, but on site it is evident that there is a clean line of demarcation and that the stone work is not being placed on the tower. M/S/C (Curtis/Whitney; Kaptur absent) approving the application as sub- mitted. CASE 3.505. Application by MICHAEL BUCCINO for architectural approval of landscape plans and main identification sign for a condominium project on the northwest corner of E. Palm Canyon Drive/Cherokee Way, R-G-A (8) Zone (IL) , Section 30. Zoning Enforcement Officer stated that the action would be on the land- scaping since the details of the sign have not been submitted. He stated that the new landscaping is an extension of the existing and that the applicant realizes that staff is concerned about the sign. M/S/C (Neel/Curtis; Kaptur absent) approving the application as sub- mitted. CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS. Planning Commission update of City Council actions . No report was given. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to discuss, Chairman adjourned the meeting at 2:25 p.m. )C MDR/ml Planning Dire or PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Council Chamber, City Hall • September 10, 1986 1:30 P.M. ROLL CALL F-Y 1986 - 1987 Present Present Excused Absences Planning Commission This Meeting to Date to date Larry Lapham, Chairman X 5 0 Hugh Curtis X 5 0 Hugh Kaptur X 4 1 Curt Ealy X 4 1 Earl Neel X 3 2 Gary Olsen X 4 0 Barbara Whitney X 2 1 Staff Present Marvin D. Roos, Planning Director Robert Green, Planner Margo Williams, Planner Dave Forcucci , Zoning Enforcement Mary E. Lawler, Recording Secretary Architectural Advisory Committee - September 8, 1986 J. Cioffi , Chairman William Johnson • Chris Mills Earl Neel Tom Doczi Chairman called the meeting to order at 1 :30 p.m. M/S/C (Olsen/Neel ; Kaptur absent) approving minute of August 27, 1986 as submitted . ADMINISTRATIVE NOTE: There were no Tribal Council comments . •