Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984/08/22 - MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Council Chamber, City Hall August 22, 1984 ... 1:30 p.m. ROLL CALL F-Y 1984 - 1985 Present Present Excused Absences Planning Commission This Meeting to Date to date Richard Service, Chairman X 3 0 Hugh Curtis X 2 1 Hugh Kaptur - 2 1 Peter Koetting X 2 1 Don Lawrence X 2 1 Paul Madsen - 2 1 Sharon Apfelbaum X 1 1 i Staff Present Douglas R. Evans, Planner III Siegfried Siefkes, Assistant City Attorney George Parmenter, Traffic Engineer Robert Green, Planner III Margo Williams, Planner II Richard Patenaude, Planner II Diana Ericksen, Community Development Coordinator Dave Forcucci, Zoning Enforcement Officer William Hudak, Zoning Enforcement Officer Mary E. Lawler, Recording Secretary Architectural Advisory Committee Present - August 20, 1984 James Cioffi, Chairman Earl Neel Chris Mills William Johnson Hugh Curtis Sharon Apfelbaum Absent: Michael Buccino Chairman called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. M/S/C (Lawrence, Apfelbaum; Kaptur, Madsen absent) approved minutes of the July 25 as submitted and August 8, 1984 meeting with the following corrections: Aug. 8, 1984, page 13, Condition #2, Case 5.0303-PD-152: Change Site 2 to Site 1. Page 3, paragraph 3, Case 5.0323-PD-158, delete "realtor". Page 14, paragraph 9 (last motion) Sign Application - Millers Outpost: Add "Curtis" to dissenting vote. August 22, 1984 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 2 CONSENT ACTION AGENDA M/S/C (Lawrence; Koetting; Kaptur, Madsen absent) taking the following actions: CASE 3.735 (Minor). Application by J. DUPREE for Bank of America for archi- tectural approval of enclosure of atrium at 777 North Palm Canyon Drive, C-1 Zone, Section 10. Restudy noting the following: 1. That the canop y material be more .sym athic to the building. 9 2. That code enforcement personnel investigate the condition of the existing canopy. CASE 3.300. Application by R. JACOBS for architectural approval of final landscape plans for industrial building located on Montalvo Way/Tachevah Drive, M-1-P Zone, Section 7. Approved subject to the following conditions: 1. That Polygoniun be replaced with Hall 's Honeysuckle or Cat's Claw. 2. That a suitable alternative be substituted for Mahonia Aquafolium. CASE 5.0321-CUP. Application by J. Tammen for Balloons Restaurant for archi- tectural approval of new entry to restaurant located at 440 S. Palm Canyon Drive, C-B-D Zone, Section 15. Continued for additional information and noting (1) that no supports be used for the awning and (2) that detailed landscape plans be submitted. Note: The Tribal Council did not meet in August and there are no Tribal Coun- cil Comments for the August 22 meeting. PUBLIC HEARINGS CASE 5.0322-CUP (Continued) . Application by A. GUEVARA for a conditional use permit for a ballroom-nightclub on Research Road between Farrell Drive/Airport Road, M-1-P Zone, Section 12. Recommendation: That the Commission order the filing of a negative declaration and give final approval subject to conditions. Chairman declared the hearing open, there being no appearances the hear- ing was closed. M/S/C (Curti s/Apfelbaum; Kaptur/Madsen absent) ordering the filing of a negative declaration and approving Case 5.0322-CUP with the following findings and subject to the following conditions: August 22, 1984 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 3 PUBLIC HEARINGS ,..,, CASE 5.0322-CUP (Continued) FINDINGS 1. That the discotheque and dance studio can be considered under a CUP in this location. i 2. That the use compliments the resort function of this City and is in harmony with the General Plan. 3. That the site as conditioned is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use. 4. That the site relates to streets and highways properly designed to carry the traffic to be generated by the proposed use. 5. That the conditions imposed are deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety and general welfare. CONDITIONS: 1. That the discotheque only be operated after the hour of 5:00 p.m. (the remaining units are closed during this period) . 2. That the dance studio may operate during daytime hours. (Maximum occupancy during this use shall be 24 persons including staff) . 3. According to available parking the use of premises be limited to those specified in conditions 1 and 2. 4. That based on the available parking (72 spaces) servable floor area of the discotheque not exceed 2,520 square feet, and the num- ber of seats shall not exceed 216. 5. That the conditional use permit remains valid only on the condi- tion that the lease agreement that guarantees the 60 extra parking spaces remains in effect. 6. That the Commission retains the right to review the CUP on a com- plaint basis. 7. That the applicant upgrade parking lot lighting standards per City zoning ordinance requirements. CASE 5.0317-PD-159. Application by JIMSAIR AVIATION, INC. for a planned development district to allow a freestanding convenience market/gas station/car wash facility located adjacent to the Palm Springs Airport, off Gene Autry Trail between Tachevah Drive/Ramon Road, A Zone, Section 18. Recommendation: That convenience market be denied and that there be a restudy and resubmission of the automobile service center under a CUP excluding the convenience market that may intergrate the carwash facility. August 22, 1984 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 4 PUBLIC HEARINGS CASE 5.0317-PD-159 (Continued) Planner III (Evans) stated that the applicant requested a continuance. Planner III (Green) presented the staff report and stated that the AAC recommended a restudy of design and that the staff recommendation for denial is based on the ordinance requirement for airport related uses which serve users of the terminal (not the general public), and that the proposal is a freestanding convenience store which does not relate to the airport terminal and which use would be precedent-setting and is not an accessory use. He stated, for example, that a restaurant use with a separate access would not be meeting the intent of the ordinance and described the present facilities within the terminal building. Chairman stated that the Commission has denied a previous request for a mini-market in conjunction with a service station. Chairman declared the hearing open. P. Selzer, attorney representing the applicants, requested a continuance for the applicant to provide additional information concerning the usage of the facility by pilots and other airport visitors. W. Kleindienst, 3963 Calle San Antonio, stated that he has spoken in favor of the convenience store/gas station in the past and suggests that cases be reviewed individually, that he had provided staff with articles concerning the unique problems of gas stations and their requirements for adjunct marketing, and that he is aware of the Commissions stance on mixed use. There being no further appearances the hearing was closed. Chairman polled the Commission to determine whether or not the study session should be scheduled to review the mixed use. Commission consen- sus was that a study session was not necessary. M/S/C (Koetting/Curtis; Kaptur/Madsen absent) continuing the application till October 10, at the applicant's request, for submission of material regarding use of the facility by pilots and other airport visitors. CASE 5.0326-PD-136A. Application by W. KLEINDIENST for Westar Associates for an amended planned development district to allow construction of a free standing restaurant with drive through facilities on North Palm Canyon Drive between Racquet Club/Via Olivera, C-1 Zone, Section 3, (Ref. Case 5.0209-PD-136) Recommendation: That the Planning Commission approve Case 5.0326-PD- 136A subject to conditions. Planner II (Williams) presented the project on the display board and '*0­1 stated that staff has had concerns on the design of the project since it August 22, 1984 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 5 PUBLIC HEARINGS CASE 5.0326-PD-136A (Continued) is the first project of its type fronting on Palm Canyon Drive and could be precedent-setting. She stated th at the staff is concerned with the exit point and also recommends additional landscaping and trellis detail for further screening of the drive-through lane. Discussion followed on the driveway width. Planner II stated that the radius had been expanded to alleviate the problem. Planner III (Evans) stated that a retaining wall may be required to obtain enough berming for the project. Planner II stated that the AAC had not recommended any changes and required the submittal of a sign program. Planner II stated that the curb will be pulled further back when Palm Canyon is widened. Chairman declared the hearing open. P. Selzer, representing the applicant, stated that the applicant concurs with the staff report and requested that the requirement for the exten- sion of the trellis be deleted since it will create a tunnel effect and is not necessary. He stated that the view from Highway 111 is satis- factory, that there are several banks with drive-throughs on Palm Canyon and two on Tahquitz with no berms and no landscaping, and that the facility is well designed. He stated that the architect and representa- tives of Carls Jr. 's were in the audience and requested an opportunity for rebuttal of any negative comments. The following people spoke in favor of the proposal : J. Flanders, 2400 North Palm Canyon Ms. L. Coltus, Manager of Linen and Things Ms. W. Haynes, Manager of Loehmanns D. Lennox, Manager of Famous Footwear. W. Kleindienst, architect for the project, stated that the intent is to have proper flow and circulation for the project, that the City traffic engineer is satisfied with the radius, that the problem with conflict between pedestrian and the automobile will be avoided, and that there is a sufficient landscape screen. In response to Commission questions, he stated that drive-throughs assist the economics of restaurants and that the equipment on the roof will be adequately screened. He stated that the condition could be included in the working drawings. L. Olson, 107 Lime Street, Brea, California, representing Carls Jr. stated that the drive-through element provides 45% of the total business and that the beauty of the corner will make the facility outstanding. Chairman stated that the Commission welcomed another aesthetically pleasing facility to the Community. Planner III stated that since the project is a PD, final development plans are to be submitted within two years from the date of final approval. i August 22, 1984 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 6 PUBLIC HEARINGS `wl CASE 5.0326-PD-136A (Continued) x Discussion ensued on staff concerns regarding the driveway width, the trellis, and landscaping. Commissioner Lawrence stated that the trellis and wall are not necessary. Planner III stated that the wall will be required only if needed for mowing and water runoff. M/S/C (Lawrence, Curtis; Koetting abstained; Kaptur, Madsen absent) approving PD 136-A with the folliwng findings and subject to the follow- ing conditions: FINDINGS 1. That the application for a drive-through restaurant under PD pro- cedures is properly a use for which a PD may be considered in order to amend the existing PD. 2. That the restaurant portion of the application is a use normally allowed in the underlying C-1 Zone and is consistent with the City's General Plan. 3. That drive-through restaurants are currently prohibited in the underlying C-1 Zone.. 4. That to properly consider the application the use prohibition should be removed from the Zoning Ordinance. 5. That the site is otherwise adequate in size and shape to accom- modate a restaurant of the size proposed including adequate park- ing, setbacks, and landscaping necessary to adjust the use to the site. 6. That the site is serviced by Palm Canyon Drive, a major thorough- fare, and Racquet Club Road, a secondary thoroughfare, which are adequately designed to accommodate the type of traffic expected to be generated by this use. 7. That an Ordinance amendment is currently being considered allowing drive-through restaurantssubject to a CUP. CONDITIONS 1. That the applicant repair the driveway and appurtenances on the front- age .of 'N. Palm Canyon Drive. 2. That all conditions of the Development Committee be met. 3. That a detailed sign program be submitted (including all si ns, menu board, speaker box, and drive-through entrance signs, etc.jq. 4. That the architectural elevations be revised to integrate the drive-through lane into the building design through a trellis structure and landscaping or a similar structure. August 22, 1984 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 7 PUBLIC HEARINGS CASE 5.0326-PD-136A (Continued) 5. That outdoor seating not be permitted unless adequate parking is available. 6. That detailed development pplans including landscape plans be submitted and approved as required by the Zoning Ordinance. 7. That final development plans be submitted within 2 years from the date of final approval pursuant to procedures set forth in the Zoning Ordinance. CASE 5.0329-GPA. Initiation by the City of Palm Springs of an amendment to the General Plan from . "Prof;essional " to General Commercial or such other designations as the Commission finds appropriate for property on the southwest corner of Sunrise Way/Ramon Road, RGA-8 Zone, Section 23. Recommendation: That the Commission order the preparation of a draft negative declaration, tentatively approve Case 5.0329-GPA by adopting a new land use category of "Mixed Commercial" and that the General Plan be implemented using a Planned Development District in lieu of a change of zone with Case 5.0243-CZ. Planner III (Evans) described the area in which the General Plan amend- ment would be applicable, and stated that the staff recommends that a PD which prohibits the highest traffic volume generators to avoid overload- ing the intersection with traffic be submitted. He replied in response to a Commission question, in the rezoning of Indian land the neighbor- hood convenience store designation "dot" was removed from the General Plan map, and that no list of uses has been developed although high turn over uses will be prohibited. Chairman declared the hearing open. J. Wessman, 72200 Clancy Lane, Rancho Mirage, requested that the Commis- sion preferably change the zoning to "Commercial" instead of a planned development district due to the fact that the traffic generation will not be as voluminous as the traffic reports indicate because the inter- section already carries a high volume of traffic, which would not be increased significantly by the proposed use, and also that the concept of the use of the corner has not been determined. He requested a Com- mission direction of whether or not a ranch type of market, such as the Irvine Ranch Market, would be appropriate. He stated that the property contigious to Alpha Beta will not be developed because it is too expen- sive to cover the flood control channel . He stated that neighborhood shopping center traffic creates less traffic throughout the City because of its localized area and that his preference would be for a General Plan amendment to "commercial" with zoning to remain R-G-A(8) , that a PD be used for the project. He stated that improvements to the site will improve the intersection of Sunrise and Ramon and that it is not spot zoning since the zoning is already fragmented and that the site area is not appropriate for residential uses since Ramon Road is a highway with many commercial uses existing presently. i i August 22, 1984 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 8 PUBLIC HEARINGS CASE 5.0329-GPA (Continued) In response to Commission question, Planner III (Evans) stated that the statistics indicate that the traffic will increase in the area, and that a traffic anaylsis may be required. He stated that the JHK Traffic Report is accurate and has been verified by reports in the field, that traffic statistics have not been used correctly by the applicant and that staff has projected what might happen in the future at the inter- section. Chairman stated that 6000 trips as indicated in the staff report would be 3000 cars with ingress and egress. There being no further appear- ances, Chairman declared the hearing closed. Assistant City Attorney stated that the General Plan amendement (GPA) should either be processed with a zone change or, the GPA should be con- tinued pending receipt of a PDD so there is no incompatability between the zoning and the Master Plan (which is prohibited by State law) . Mr. Wessman stated that delaying processing would be a problem since he can- not approach a client unless he knows what use will be allowed on the site. Discussion followed. Commissioner Koetting asked if the applicant wished to obtain a client and submit a plan, which if approved, would allow a General Plan amend- ment to be processed. He stated that the applicant should submit a con- cept for the site. Mr. Wessman requested that the Commission indicate appropriate uses before any more time, money and effort is spent. In response to Commission question, Traffic Engineer stated that futher traffic anaylsis is needed and that high traffic generators should be prohibited. That uses being discussed are high traffic generators. Planner III (Evans) , in reply to Commission question, stated that the staff recommends a new land use classification of "Mixed Commercial". The Assistant City Attorney has indicated he would like to review the staff recommendation to a conditional zone change to C-1 subject to submission of a PD (in lieu of an architectural approval application) . Assistant City Attorney stated that conditional zoning must be used carefully since if a zone change is approved and the conditions are not met, the property does not revert to the original zone. He stated that a PD in lieu of a change of zone which is compatible with the General Plan meets the requirements of state law, and that a PD application can- not be considered by the Commission until a specific proposal is sub- mitted therefore the PD should be processed concurrently with the General Plan amendment. Planner III requested direction from the Commission for the use, i.e. , "mixed commercial" or "straight commercial" which will then be discussed with the City Attorney, and that a PD application would be preferable in order to control traffic impacts. He stated that the environmental assessment could be ordered prepared with review of the actual zoning and General Plan amendment at the September 12 meeting. I August 22, 1984 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 9 PUBLIC HEARINGS ., CASE 5.0329-GPA (Continued) Chairman stated that the Commission does not want straight commercial zoning because of the lack of standards and that a procedure is needed to expedite the applicant's proposal . He stated that the Commission could order the preparation of a draft negative declaration and advise staff on the direction to take. M/S/C (Koetting/Curtis; Kaptur/Madsen absent) ordering the preparation of a draft negative declaration and continuing the case to September 12. Discussion followed on the type of zoning that is appropriate for the corner. M/S/C (Koetting/Curtis; Kaptur/Madsen) For staff to prepare a recom- mendation evaluating a commercial use on the corner and whether or not there should be a General Plan amendment or a change of zone. Mr. Wessman stated that he would like to build a mini neighborhood center, and that he could not see how changing the General Plan to "Commercial" would be appropriate if he would have to submit a PD appli- cation that specifies the use. He stated that City processing is lengthy. Chairman stated that the Commission concern is on the scale of the pro- ject at that particular corner and that the most preferrable category is "mixed use" where the intensity of traffic can be controlled. Mr. Wessman stated that a supermarket cannot be placed on the long, narrow property and questioned whether or not the Commission wanted a ranch-type of market. Planner III (Evans) stated that the issue is not so much the General Plan, but how the development can be obtained. He stated that a "Mixed Commercial" use implementation method recommendation (zoning) can be developed for Commission review September 12 after discussions with the Assistant City Attorney and the Planning Director, who is on vacation. Chairman polled the Commission on whether a ranch type of market use is appropriate. Commission consensus was that it is an appropriate use. PUBLIC COMMENTS None. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS CASE 5.0312-J-MISC. Application by VTN CONSOLIDATED INC. for Flow Wind Corportation for a Change of Zone (No. 4273) from W-2 to W-E for prop- erty located south of the junction of Highway 62/I-10, Section 18, Sphere of Influence. August 22, 1984 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 10 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS ,.. CASE 5.0312-J-MISC. (Continued) Planner III presented the project on the display board and stated that the staff recommends either denial or deferrment of action until the Sphere of Influence plan is adopted. He stated that if approved by the Commission, staff recommends smaller turbine development close to the highway and reduction in the number of turbines to create more open space. R. McClendin, representing Flow Wind Corportation, Livermore, Califor- nia, stated that the turbines will supply energy for 1700 homes and pay $500,000 a year in taxes, due to the value of the turbines, and that the company will cooperate with the County and VTN in the environmental aspects, and described the history of the corporation. He stated that the generators are one of the largest generators of horsepower in the valley and that a removal bond in the amount of $265 to $300 for each machine will be posted as a County requirement. He stated that the aluminum in the machines is valuable for recycling, that the words "Flow Wind" on the blades will not be allowed because of County standards, and that the machines will be either light gray or tan in color. In reply to Commission question, Planner III (Evans) stated that the machines are difficult to see in the photo display prepared by the applicant but easily visible in the field. He stated also that there is a Southern California Edison right-of-way for the Devers substation utility corridor transversing the project, and that the energy produced goes into the Edison grid system and will not affect energy costs to the local consumer. He stated that the energy produced is not the cheapest electricity developed, that the City Building Division is preparing a cost anaylsis of co-generation versus wind energy, and that to reduce costs to the public, the City would have to become a utility and sell electricity. Commissioner Lawrence stated that no taxes or energy is given to the City by the machines, that the windmills will exist a long time since they do not run, there is nothing that the Commission can do regarding development of these projects, and that he wished that the Commission did not have to review them. He stated that the City recommended against the development of turbines south of the freeway. M/S/C (Lawrence/Apfelbaum; Kaptur/Madsen absent) denying Case 5.0312-J- MISC pending completion of a Sphere of Influence plan. ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL ITEMS The Planning Commission reviewed plans, discussed, and took action on the following items involving architectural approval subject to the con- ditions as outlined. CASE 3.727. Application by PALM SPRINGS STORAGE PARTNERS, LTD. for architec- tural approval of portable storage units in an existing walled-in storage facility on Mesquite Road between Williams Road/Vella Road, M-1 Zone, Section 19. August 22, 1984 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 11 ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL ITEMS CASE 3.727 (Continued) C. Mills, the architect, 278-C N. Palm Canyon, described the configura- tion and transport of the portable storage units and stated that although they are portable, they are permanant in nature. M/S/C (Koetting/Curtis; Kaptur/Madsen absent) approving Case 3.727 sub- ject to the following conditions: 1. That all recommendations of the Development Committee be met. 2. That there be no stacking of containers over the height of one container. 3. That units be visually screened from the public right-of-way. CASE 3.717 (Ref. TTM 14899-Revised). Application by FRIEDMAN VENTURES for architectural approval of revised exterior elevations for an industrial park on Gene Autry Trail between Sunny Dunes Road/Mesquite Avenue, M-1 Zone (I.L.) , Section 20. Planner III (Green) presented the project on the display board and stated that the landscape plan for Gene Autry Trail is being followed by the applicant. Chairman questioned the use of gun metal gray for the color of the building. Ms. E. Ricketts, project architect, stated that gray was chosen for con- trast, and that uses would be light commercial for the building. Discussion followed on the elevations of the project. Commissioner Apfelbaum stated that the AAC had not reviewed the color. Ms. Ricketts explained that the architects tried to comply with both the applicants and the AAC's wishes. Planner III (Evans) stated that the Building and Safety Director would have to answer questions on the insulation quality of dark roofs. Ms. Ricketts stated that the color makes no difference regarding heat reten- tion. M/S/C (Curtis/Koetting; Kaptur/Madsen absent; Apfelbaum/Service dis- sented) approving the application subject to the following conditions: 1. That the vertical roof elevations be stucco. 2. That the rear portion of the roof elevation be angled. 3. That the revised elevations submitted August 22, 1984 are approved. 4. That a 6" minimum variation in elevation be provided between the vertical and sloped roof elements. August 22, 1984 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 12 ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL ITEMS ,., CASE 3.717 (Continued) 5. That all recommendations of the Development Committee be met. Chairman stated that he dissented because of the minimal (poor) design of the building. CASE 3.730 (Minor) . Application by N. CRISAFI for architectural approval of fascia modification on property located at 4775-4777 Ramon Road, M-1 Zone, Section 20. Planner III (Green) presented the project on the display board and stated that the AAC recommended a restudy. He stated that the applicant is requesting that the Commission consider the detailed landscaping plan (which was not presented to the AAC) , and that the applicant will redesign the canopy and paint the stucco and restripe the parking lot. He stated that staff recommends approval of the landscape plan, deletion of the parallel parking spaces on Ramon Road, revisions to the landscape planter, and to refer details of the landscape plan to staff for approval . Discussion followed on Commission action. C. Maxwell , representing the applicant, stated that the owner wishes to revamp the building. Chairman stated that he would provide Mr. Maxwell with the name of a company which has a graffiti-proof product for the exterior of the building. Mr. Maxwell stated that when the building is occupied there will not be a graffiti problem and requested permission to enclose the garage door and stucco the opening. Chairman stated that piecemeal changes cannot be considered. Mr. Maxwell stated that only clean-up changes are being requested. Commissioner Koetting suggested concrete or stucco or glu-lam materials instead of a metal roof. Mr. Maxwell stated that the Planning Director indicated that the site is in a redevelopment project area and suggested that the applicant not do extensive work on the building. M/S/C (Lawrence/Koetting; Kaptur/Madsen absent) ordering a restudy of the project including elevations, landscaping and parking. CASE 5.0286-ZTA. Initiation by the City of Palm Springs for an amendment to the Zoning Text for the regulation of drive-through facilities for all commercial , industrial zones (except C-B-D-Central Business District Zone), City-wide. August 22, 1984 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 13 ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL ITEMS CASE 5.0286-ZTA (Continued) Planner II (Patenaude) presented the staff report and stated that there are no guidelines to review drive-through facilities, that Commission and Council have indicated that drive-throughs may be appropriate, and that staff recommends that they be allowed in the zones by CUP because the process would remedy design problems of drive-throughs of the past. He discussed amendments to sections of the Zoning Text and stated that the amendment would include drive-through facilities for banks. Planner III (Evans) stated that only restaurant uses would be required to obtain a CUP for a drive-thru facility. Discussion followed on problems with existing facilities. Planner III (Evans) stated that retrofit is a problem for existing facilities, and that drive-through facilities would be subject to design requirements. Chairman stated that the ordinance would present a problem in some bank drive-throughs because of a stacking problem, and that there should be a greater stacking capacity so that cars are not stacked in the public right-of-way. In reply to Commission question, Planner III stated that the Traffic Engineer reviews all projects which affect roadways. Assistant City Attorney stated that the terminology "drive-through" versus "drive-in" does not present a problem, but that he has not reviewed the document. M/S/C (Koetting/Curtis; Kaptur/Madsen absent) ordering the preparation of a draft negative declaration and continuing the case for further review to September 12. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS (Continued) DETERMINATION. Planning Commission determination that the Capital Improvement Program is not in conflict with the City's General Plan. Community Development Coordinator explained that the Commission deter- mines that the CIP is in conformance with the General Plan as a formal- ity, and that the CIP had been adopted in July. Commissioner Lawrence requested that staff give guidelines on the next CIP early in the process for Commission input before Council action. M/S/C (Lawrence/Apfelbaum; Kaptur/Madsen absent) determining that the CIP is in conformance with the General Plan. August 22, 1984 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 14 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS (Continued) DETERMINATION. Planning Commission review of Desert Water Agency Capital Improvement Program. Planner III (Evans) stated that the staff will meet with the DWA in reference to the CIP and Indian Avenue construction is of concern, since the City does not want Indian Avenue being repaired during the season, and that the hydroelectric facility at Snow Creek is an informational item. He stated that the water mains are of concern on Highway 111 since installation of the mains maybe growth inducing. He stated that the Commission could find all of the items except for the three dis- cussed are in conformance with the City's General Plan, with the three items to be reviewed at the September 12 meeting. M/S/C (Lawrence/Curtis; Kaptur/Madsen absent) determining that all of the projects described in the DWA letter of July 16, except for the Indian Avenue construction, the Snow Creek Hydroelectric Plant and the Highway 111 water main installations are in conformance with the City's General Plan. This motion was later amended with the consent of the seconder to continue all items to September 12 for staff to prepare a more detailed description of all proposed projects. Note: Commis- sioners felt that more information is needed on the projects. Planner III stated that input could be provided if the Commission felt that the DWA were providing waterlines to an area where the Commission felt service should not be installed. Discussion followed on utility company representation on the City's Development Committee. Planner III stated that some company representa- tives attend, and that all agencies receive copies of applications. He stated that the DWA aids staff in determining whether trunk lines are needed for blowsand mitigation on projects. REVIEW. Planning Commission review of TTM 20087, a PUD for a 48-unit cluster housing development located in the City's Sphere of Influence south of the Whitewater Channel west of Gene Autry Trail (formerly Palm Drive) and east of Whitewater Club Drive, Section 6. M/S/C (Koeting/Curtis; Kaptur/Madsen) for a restudy of TTM 20087. Noting the following: 1. On-site drainage and method of handling the retention basin over- flow. 2. Flood control measures from adjacent Whitewater Channel . 3. Alignment and dedication (142' ) necessary for Whitewater Express- way. 4. Circulation system design. (A buffer is needed between project and adjacent properties.) 5. A minimum of a 15' separation between buildings. 6. More imaginative design. August 22, 1984 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 15 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS (Continued) REVIEW (Continued) 7. Blowsand mitigation measures. 8. That visitor parking be provided. 9. That a wind break is necessary. 10. That the freeway right-of-way be shown. 11. That a buffer is needed between the adjacent property rear yards and Loop Road. REVIEW. Planning Commission review of proposed General Plan amendments to the circulation plan for Riverside County for streets located in the sphere area. (Windy Point/Whitewater area.) Planner III (Evans) stated that the three "paper" streets are proposed to be removed from the General Plan because of wind energy development and that many streets have been vacated in the area and require dedica- tion of property. He stated that staff recommends that action be post- poned until the Sphere Plan is completed. Assistant City Attorney stated that if the project is tabled it would have to be removed before the end of the next meeting. M/S/C (Apfelbaum/Curtis; Kaptur/Madsen absent) recommending to the City Council that amendments to the circulation plan for Riverside County for streets in the Windy Point/Whitewater area be postponed until the Sphere Plan is completed. ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL ITEMS (Continued) SIGN APPLICATION (Continued) . Application by J. WESSMAN for Ralph's Market for architectural approval for revised plans for a monument sign for a supermarket in a neighborhood shopping center on South Palm Canyon Drive between Morongo Road/Belardo Road, PD-131 (I.L.) , Section 22. Continued to September 12 at the applicant's request. CASE 3.724. Application by WATT-JACOBS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY for architectural approval of a single family residence on Vista Chino Avenue north of Whitewater Club Drive, R-1-C Zone, Section 1. and `�,.. CASE 3.725. Application by WATT-JACOBS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY for architectural approval of a single family residence located on Sunrise Way/Joyce Drive, R-1-C Zone, Section 1. and August 22, 1984 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 16 ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL ITEMS (Continued) CASE 3.726. Application by WATT-JACOBS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY for architectural approval of a single family residence located on Sunrise Way/Joyce Drive, R-1-C Zone, Section 1. Discussion ensued on trim and wall detail and overhangs of the single family residences. M/S/C (Koetting/Lawrence; Kaptur/Madsen absent) approving Cases 3.724, 3.725, and 3.726 subject to the following conditions: 1. That 80% of street trees be 24" box size except Eucalyptus which may be 15 gallon size. 2. That Eucalyptus Citrodora be substituted with Eucalyptus Polyanthemos and that Quercus suber be replaced with a suitable alternate. 3. The detailed landscape and irrigation plants be submitted prior to the issuance of building permits. Plans shall include mounding and berming. 4. That the rectangular attic vent at the gable be replaced with a round vent. 5. That the garage have a full-hip roof. 6. That all recommendations of the Development Committee be met. 7. That all windows facing public right-of-ways be trimmed with a wood trim or a brick windowsill . 8. That the roof overhang be extended to 24" or 30". 9. That all walls meet code requirements. SIGN APPLICATION. Application by C. PAOLI for architectural approval of main identification sign and awning as a cover for an outdoor dining area for restaurant at 1211 S. Palm Canyon Drive (former Swiss Chalet location, C-1 Zone, Section 23. M/S/C (Koetting/Curtis; Kaptur/Madsen absent) for a restudy noting the following: 1. That the awning tie into the arch element of the building. 2. That detailed landscape and irrigation plans be submitted. 3. That exterior elevations for the west side be submitted. �, 4. That a parking lot redesign plan be submitted. August 22, 1984 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 17 ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL ITEMS (Continued) ..r CASE 7.561-AMM. Application by D. ZEISLER for architectural approval of revi- se7 plans for entry gate for single-family residence at 478 Camino Sur, R-1-A Zone, Section 10. M/S/C (Koetting/Curtis; Apfelbaum abstained; Kaptur/Madsen absent) approving the application as submitted. COMMISSION REPORTS, REQUESTS AND DISCUSSION - Andreas Cove Country Club Field Trip (Case 5.0258-PD-145) . Field trip is scheduled for September 8 at 7:00 a.m. with the Commissioners to meet gate. Planner III Evans stated that staff t the Indian toll a ) a ( 9 responses to the applicant's comments in the EIR will be mailed to the Commission on August 23. - Andreas Cove Country Club Study Session (Case 5.0258-PD-145) . Review of the conditions of approval scheduled for September 12, at 12:30 p.m. to 1:30 p.m. , in the City Council Chamber; remaining agenda items will also be reviewed. ADJOURNMENT The being no further business to discuss the Chairman adjourned the meeting at 5:20 p.m. Planning ector MDR/dre/ml WP/PC MIN 4 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Council Chamber, City Hall -- September 26, 1984 1 :30 p.m. ROLL CALL F-Y 1984 - 1985 Present Present Excused Absences Planning Commission This Meeting to Date to date Richard Service, Chairman X 5 0 Hugh Curtis X 4 1 Hugh Kaptur X 4 1 Peter Koetting X 4 1 Don Lawrence X 4 1 Paul Madsen X 4 1 Sharon Apfelbaum X 3 1 Staff Present Marvin D. Roos, Planning Director Douglas R. Evans, Planner III Siegfried Siefkes, Assistant City Attorney Robert Green, Planner III Margo Williams, Planner II Richard Patenaude, Planner II John Terell , Redevelopment Planner Emily Perri , Economic Development & Housing Specialist .► Mary E. Lawler, Recording Secretary Architectural Advisory Committee Present - September 24, 1984 James Cioffi , Chairman Earl Neel Michael Buccino William Johnson Hugh Curtis Sharon Apfelbaum Chris Mills Chairman called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. M/S/C (Curtis/Koetting) approving minutes o Zst2,> 1984 ith the following correction: Attendance for Sharon Apfe -Vie-be M/S/C---(-Law nce, Curtis; K tur, Madsen absent) approving the Minutes of 'September j2 with the follti�wing addition: Page 23, TTM 17260 and Case 3.645, tWb motion . . . "a'I'd approval of TTM 17260".