HomeMy WebLinkAbout2024-04-17 AIRPORT COMMISSION AGENDA
AIRPORT COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA
Airport Conference Room, Palm Springs International Airport
3400 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way, Palm Springs, CA 92262
Wednesday, April 17, 2024 - 5:30 P.M.
To view/listen/participate in the meeting live, please contact Paula Pak at
Paula.Pak@palmspringsca.gov or the following telephone number (760) 318-3832 to register for the
Zoom meeting. There will be an email with Zoom credentials sent after registration is complete, in
order to access the meeting and offer public comment.
In addition, the meeting will also be teleconferenced pursuant to Government Code Section 54953
from the following location(s):
TELECONFERENCE LOCATION(S):
Commissioner David Feltman – City of Palm Springs
5050 Kestral Parkway South
Sarasota, FL 34231
Each location is accessible to the public, and members of the public may address the Airport
Commission from any of the locations listed above. Any person who wishes to provide public testimony
in public comments is requested to file a speaker card before the Public Comments portion of the
meeting. You may submit your public comment to the Airport Commission electronically. Material may
be emailed to: Paula.Pak@palmspringsca.gov - Transmittal prior to the start of the meeting is
required. Any correspondence received during or after the meeting will be distributed to the Airport
Commission and retained for the official record.
To view Airport Commission meeting videos click on YouTube.
City of Palm Springs: Riverside County:
Margaret Park
City of Cathedral City:
Tony Michaelis
City of Palm Desert:
Kevin Wiseman Aftab Dada -
Chair
David Feltman
Kevin J. Corcoran
Vice Chair
J Craig Fong City of Indian Wells:
Robert Berriman
City of Coachella:
Denise Delgado
City of Rancho Mirage:
Keith Young Vacant Tracy Martin
Todd Burke M. Guillermo Suero City of La Quinta:
Kathleen Hughes
City of Desert Hot Springs:
Jan Pye
City of Indio:
Rick Wise Daniel Caldwell Dave Banks
Palm Springs City Staff
Scott C. Stiles Harry Barrett Jr., A.A.E. Jeremy Keating
City Manager Airport Executive Director Assistant Airport Director
Airport Commission Meeting Agenda
April 17, 2024 – Page 2
_______________________________________________________________________________________
1. CALL TO ORDER – PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
2. POSTING OF AGENDA
3. ROLL CALL
4. ACCEPTANCE OF AGENDA
5. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Limited to three minutes on any subject within the purview of
the Commission
6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Minutes of the Airport Commission Special Meeting of
December 6, 2023
7. INTRODUCTIONS AND PRESENTATIONS:
7.A Tanya Perez, Administrative Specialist
8. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS:
8.A Car Rental Car Wash Facility Noise Update
8.B CONRAC Alternatives Update
8.C Strategic Business Plan - Notice to Proceed to InterVISTA
8.D Relocating Existing Art
8.E Marketing and Business Development Committee Update
8.F Marketing and Air Service Update
8.G Ad Hoc Design Review Committee Update
8.H Concessions Update
8.I Financial Summary Update
8.J Projects and Airport Capital Improvement Program Update
9. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT
10. COMMISSIONERS REQUESTS AND REPORTS
11. REPORT OF COUNCIL ACTIONS:
11.A Past City Council Actions
11.B Future City Council Actions
12. RECEIVE AND FILE:
12.A Airline Activity Report March 2024
12.B Airline Activity Report Fiscal Year Comparison
13. COMMITTEES:
13.A Future Committee Meetings
Airport Commission Meeting Agenda
April 17, 2024 – Page 3
_______________________________________________________________________________________
ADJOURNMENT:
The Airport Commission will adjourn to a Regular Meeting on May 15, 2024, at 5:30 P.M.
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
I, Harry Barrett, Jr., Airport Executive Director, City of Palm Springs, California, hereby certify this
agenda was posted on April 11, 2024, in accordance with established policies and procedures.
PUBLIC NOTICES
Pursuant to G.C. Section 54957.5(b)(2) the designated office for inspection of records in connection
with the meeting is the Office of the City Clerk, City Hall, 3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way. Complete
Agenda Packets are available for public inspection at: City Hall Office of the City Clerk. Agenda and
staff reports are available on the City’s website www.palmspringsca.gov. If you would like additional
information on any item appearing on this agenda, please contact the Office of the City Clerk at
(760) 323-8204.
It is the intention of the City of Palm Springs to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
in all respects. If, as an attendee or a participant at this meeting, or in meetings on a regular basis,
you will need special assistance beyond what is normally provided, the City will attempt to
accommodate you in every reasonable manner. Please contact the Department of Aviation, (760)
318-3800, at least 48 hours prior to the meeting to inform us of your particular needs and to
determine if accommodation is feasible.
Page 1 of 6
AIRPORT COMMISSION
ACTION SUMMARY MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING
Wednesday, December 06, 2023 – 1:00 P.M.
_____________________________________________________________________
1. CALL TO ORDER:
Vice Chairman Corcoran called the Airport Commission Meeting to order at 1:05 P.M.
The meeting was held in-person and via videoconference.
2. POSTING OF THE AGENDA: Posted on December 1, 2023.
3. ROLL CALL:
Commissioners Present:
Dave Banks (Palm Springs) Tony Michaelis (Cathedral City)
Robert Berriman (Indian Wells) Margaret Park (Riverside County)
Todd Burke (Palm Springs) Jan Pye (Desert Hot Springs)
Kevin Corcoran (Palm Springs) - Vice Chair Rick Wise (Indio)
David Feltman (Palm Springs) Kevin Wiseman (Palm Desert)
J Craig Fong (Palm Springs) Keith Young (Rancho Mirage)
Tracy Martin (Palm Springs)
Commissioners Absent: Daniel Caldwell (Palm Springs), Aftab Dada (Palm
Springs), Denise Delgado (Coachella), Kathleen Hughes (La Quinta), M. Guillermo
Suero (Palm Springs)
Staff Present:
Scott C. Stiles, City Manager
Harry Barrett, Jr., Airport Executive Director
Jeremy Keating, Assistant Airport Director
Daniel Meier, Deputy Director of Aviation, Marketing and Air Service
Victoria Carpenter, Airport Administration Manager
Jacob Colella, Airport Maintenance Superintendant
Ramon Sanchez, Interim Airport Operations Manager
Geremy Holm, City Attorney
Christina Brown, Executive Program Administrator
Others Present:
Ryan Hayes, Mead & Hunt, Inc.
ITEM 6
Palm Springs Airport Commission
Action Summary Minutes of Special Meeting
December 06, 2023
______________________________________________________________________
Page 2 of 6
4. ACCEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA:
ACTION: Accept the Agenda as presented. Moved by Commissioner Young,
seconded by Commissioner Wiseman, and unanimously approved noting the
absence of Commissioners Caldwell, Dada, Delgado, Hughes and Suero.
Vice Chairman Corcoran asked Commissioner Feltman to lead the Pledge of
Allegiance.
5. PUBLIC COMMENTS: None
6. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS:
6.A Strategic Planning Session Update
Vice Chairman Corcoran introduced City Manager Scott Stiles, and City Manager
Stiles spoke briefly to the Commissioners about the significance of the Airport’s
growth, and he thanked them for their participation in the planning process.
Airport Executive Director Barrett reported on the accomplishments of the various
Airport Divisions over the past twelve months, including: Administration, Maintenance,
Marketing and Air Service, Operations and Security.
Airport Executive Director Barrett shared his mission to establish a 2024 Strategic
Business Plan with the goal of: 1) communicating the Airport’s vision to the community
and stakeholders; 2) give the PSP organization direction; 3) define and track progress
toward key goals; and 4) improve business decisions. He stated that the Strategic
Business Plan would be presented to the Commission in December of 2024 and
quarterly updates would be provided on the staff’s progress.
Airport Executive Director Barrett reported that the Airport had completed the
negotiations of the new hybrid Airport Use and Lease Agreements (AULA) with the
signatory airlines, and he provided details of the negotiation and the differences
between the old and new AULA. Commissioner Wise asked if this was a unique rate
methodology, and Mr. Barrett confirmed that a significant number of airports are also
using similar rate methodologies. Vice Chairman Corcoran asked how the hybrid rate
methodology would impact the Airport with respect to landing fees, and especially in
comparison to other airports in Southern California. Airport Administration Manager
Carpenter stated that the Airport’s landing fees have remained the same and were
based on expenses for the year. She said that she did not have information readily
available to reflect comparisons with other airports in Southern California and that she
would provide that information at the next Airport Commission meeting. Mr. Barrett
noted that the enplanement fees had been slightly increased. Vice Chairman Corcoran
asked what the thinking was behind keeping the fees so low. Mr. Barrett explained
Palm Springs Airport Commission
Action Summary Minutes of Special Meeting
December 06, 2023
______________________________________________________________________
Page 3 of 6
that raising the fees to the airlines increased the probability of those same airlines
taking their planes to other airports.
Commissioner Fong asked which signatory airlines were covered by those fees and
what the arrangement was for the airlines that were not covered. Mr. Barrett reported
that the signatory carriers included Alaksa, American, Delta, United, Southwest,
WestJet, and Air Canada. He stated that the remaining non-signatory airlines Flair,
JetBlue, Sun Country, Avelo, and Allegiant were not covered per their business
decision because it gives them the flexibility to leave the market with no repercussions,
and in terms of metrics, non-signatory airlines do not have priority gates and they pay
a 25% premium to use the Airport’s resources. Commissioner Wiseman asked if
baggage was included in the enplanement fee, and Mr. Barrett said that baggage was
a separate fee. Commissioner Corcoran asked if the Airport was making more money
with the new AULA, and Mr. Barrett confirmed that the Airport was making more
money.
Commissioner Fong asked if the City Attorney reviewed the agreement or if an outside
firm reviewed the agreement. Mr. Barrett confirmed that the City Attorney was involved
in reviewing the agreement, and Ms. Carpenter added that an aviation financial
consultant also assisted with the agreement and the negotiations. Vice Chairman
Corcoran asked Mr. Barrett if there was anything that he wanted that did not get
approved by the airlines in the negotiations, and Mr. Barrett confirmed that the Airport
was able to successfully negotiate all items that the Airport staff had set out to have
the airlines approve in the negotiations.
Airport Administration Manager Carpenter reviewed her presentation regarding the
different funding received from Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to help fund the
various capital projects at the Airport.
Airport Executive Director Barrett presented the 5-Year Capital Review and Progress
Report. Commissioner Feltman asked about the Wi-Fi improvements and where that
project resides. Mr. Barrett stated that on the following Monday he would be meeting
with the Director of IT and the City Manager to work on a plan that would be presented
to the Commission. Commissioner Corcoran added that the funds for the Airport’s Wi-
Fi project had been approved by the City Council. Commissioner Feltman asked
where the project landed in the scope of priorities, and Mr. Barrett affirmed that it was
a priority, and he reiterated that he was presently working with IT and the City Manager
on a plan that would be presented to the Airport Commission.
Commissioner Young referred to the restroom renovation project, and he asked if the
proposed completion dates presented were the original dates, and Mr. Barrett stated
that the completion dates had been changed in part because of challenges with FAA
environmental clearances and because of some challenges in the procurement phase.
Palm Springs Airport Commission
Action Summary Minutes of Special Meeting
December 06, 2023
______________________________________________________________________
Page 4 of 6
Commissioner Corcoran asked the Airport Master Plan consultant Ryan Hayes with
Mead and Hunt, Inc. (Mead & Hunt) about the Consolidated Rental Car Facility
(CONRAC) design proposed completion date of Q4 - 2026, and he questioned how it
could take two years to design the facility considering it has only been talked about
for the last five years. Mr. Hayes stated that the CONRAC is a program, and the FAA
requires an environmental review of the entire program which causes the delays.
Commissioner Corcoran asked Assistant Airport Director Keating for an update on the
shade structures and specifically the reason for the delay in completing the project.
Mr. Keating explained that the Airport team was doing everything in its power to move
this project forward, and he noted that the project faced some challenges with design,
permitting, etc. He further stated that it would be presented to the City Council for
approval and that it would be out of the Airport’s hands once it went to permitting.
Mr. Barrett provided an update on the Airport staffing, and he shared a slide
presentation with photographs to highlight the daily challenges faced by the Airport
staff. Commissioner Fong asked for confirmation that the Airport as a facility has little
or no control over when the airlines choose to land and/or take off and how many
flights come in at once. Mr. Barrett confirmed that the information was accurate, he
said that it is the Airport’s responsibility to accommodate the airline’s needs and that
the only time the Airport could intervene would be if a situation was to create an unsafe
environment for the Airport. Commissioner Feltman asked if the Airport staff was
collecting any data to share with the airlines’ corporate offices to demonstrate the
impacts that their scheduling has on the Airport. Mr. Barrett confirmed that the data is
collected and provided to the airlines, and he explained that the airlines believe that
the way they are scheduling is the most efficient way to schedule the flights.
Commissioner Feltman noted that from his personal experience, the customer service
plumets when the airlines hire contractors, and he asked if there was anything that
could be done to mitigate that situation. Mr. Barrett said that it does depend on the
contractors and the airlines’ internal requirements and how they choose to do
business, and he said that generally speaking, contractors receive lower pay which
makes the contractor less invested which creates customer experience challenges.
Vice Chairman Corcoran asked how many of the airlines were using contractors
versus having their own employees servicing their passengers. Interim Airport
Operations Manager Sanchez stated that all but two airlines, Southwest and Alaska
Airlines, used contractors. Vice Chairman Corcoran asked what the Airport could do
to mitigate how contractors behave with the passengers. Mr. Barrett stated that
sometimes these matters are tied to the agreements with the airlines. He noted that
the previous agreement with the airlines did not provide enough definition in the
agreement and that the agreement had been in place for over 20 years. Mr. Barrett
said that over time, the Airport staff will continue to have discussions with the airlines
that are relative to the agreement, and staff will be able to capture the metrics of how
the airlines are doing business. He further stated that for now the Airport was heavily
Palm Springs Airport Commission
Action Summary Minutes of Special Meeting
December 06, 2023
______________________________________________________________________
Page 5 of 6
reliant on Deputy Director of Aviation, Marketing and Air Service Meier speaking to
the airlines about the feedback that is received from the travelers about their customer
experience.
Airport Executive Director Barrett provided information regarding the day-to-day
challenges faced by the Airport staff including: 1) decentralized department functions
such as human resources, information technology, procurement, permitting and city
engineering; 2) prolonged employee hiring process; 3) recruitment of contractors; and
4) space constraints. Commissioner Martin asked if the City provides any solutions to
the challenges being faced by the Airport. Mr. Barrett stated that the City staff has
been an advocate in trying to find solutions. Vice Chairman Corcoran said that it was
important for staff to continue having discussions with the various City departments
about improving efficiencies. Commissioner Young suggested that the Airport staff
identify examples of airports that were able to navigate similar issues effectively with
municipal governments.
Commissioner Burke asked if there were any shining examples of airports that were
similar in size and scope to this Airport that were doing well with customer service that
the Airport staff could look to. Mr. Barrett stated that he could not name a specific
airport and noted that there were airports that have created efficiencies around these
challenges and that the Airport staff would research those airports. Commissioner
Wise suggested that the airline’s contractors would provide better customer service if
the Airport could find a way to give them a sense of belonging like the Airport
employees have.
Commissioner Fong asked if there was a way to have a standardized customer
service policy in the AULA that would be across the Airport regardless of whether they
were an airline employee, airport employee or contractor to raise the customer
satisfaction and create consistency across the Airport. He opined that the customer’s
experience with any airline is a reflection on the entire Airport and a reason to unify
the customer experience. Mr. Barrett stated that those conversations and expectations
have been discussed with the airlines and were a big focus for the calendar year 2024.
The Airport wants to ensure that its business partners are aligned with the Airport’s
vision and expectations, and as it continues its business relationship with those
stakeholders and updates those agreements, it will provide opportunities to do that as
well.
Commissioner Martin referred to the Airport being designated as a small hub airport,
and he asked if the Airport’s growth plan could move the Airport towards being
designated as a medium hub airport. Mr. Barrett said that in his opinion, he believed
that the Airport was moving towards being designated as a medium hub airport. Mr.
Hayes noted that the airport designations are based on national enplanements.
Commissioner Young asked how an airport’s hub designation relates to the FAA. Mr.
Hayes said that the FAA does use the hub designations for funding purposes.
Palm Springs Airport Commission
Action Summary Minutes of Special Meeting
December 06, 2023
______________________________________________________________________
Page 6 of 6
Vice Chairman Corcoran referred to the strategic planning process that would be
completed in December 2024, and he asked if the Commission would be receiving
updates along the way. Mr. Barrett said that he would be providing quarterly updates.
6.B Master Plan Update
Ryan Hayes with Mead & Hunt provided a briefing on the Airport Master Plan.
The Airport Commission had a lengthy discussion about the Airport Master Plan
terminal design alternatives, and the Commission concluded that further discussion
was needed before making a recommendation to the City Council. It was determined
that the recommendation to the City Council would need to include a summary of the
pros and cons for Alternatives 1A and 3, and it was further agreed that Mead & Hunt
would provide the summary of pros and cons for the respective Master Plan
alternatives to Executive Program Administrator Brown by Monday, December 11,
2023, who would then forward it to the Commissioners. The Commissioners would be
reviewing said summary, and the Commissioners would provide their own list of pros
and cons and questions to be added to the summary that would be presented at the
December 20, 2023 Airport Commission meeting.
ACTION: To continue the agenda item to the December 20, 2023 Airport Commission
meeting. Moved by Commissioner Young, seconded by Commissioner
Wiseman, and unanimously approved noting the absence of Commissioners
Caldwell, Dada, Delgado, Hughes and Suero.
6.C Cancellation of December 20, 2023 Airport Commission Meeting
There was no discussion or action taken for this item.
7. COMMISSIONERS REQUESTS AND REPORTS: None.
ADJOURNMENT:
The Airport Commission adjourned at 6:30 P.M. to a Regular Meeting on December 20,
2023, at 5:30 P.M.
____________________________
Paula Pak
Executive Administrative Assistant
Palm Springs Airport
Master Plan
Airport Commission Meeting –CONRAC Planning
April 17, 2024
ITEM 8.B
AIRPORT MASTER PLAN
CONRAC Analysis Agenda
Evaluation Matrix Summary
Planning Goals and Assumptions
Pertinent Development Regulations
CONRAC Requirements
Alternative Site Evaluations
Site 1 –On Site
Site 2 –Off Site (E Ramon Road)
Site 3 –Off Site (N Farrell Road)
AIRPORT MASTER PLAN
Evaluation Matrix Summary
Evaluation Metric Site 1 –On Site Site 2 –Off Site (E
Ramon Road)
Site 3 –Off Site
(N Farrell Road)
Passenger Experience
70+ percent of PSP passengers are leisure travelers who rent vehicles.Proximity to terminal is critically important.
Costs
Up-front capital costs are expected to be similar, but operational costs for shuttle service differentiate on-site vs off-site
alternatives.
Shuttle Route Impacts -Traffic Impacts, Land Use Compatibility
The CONRAC will bring significant traffic generation. The roadway capacity, ingress and egress, and route land use
compatibility (adjacency to residential land uses) all influence site viability.
Rental Car Concessionaire Preference
Rental Car Concessionaires have indicated preference for a site that maximizes passenger experience, lessens operational
costs, and boosts operational efficiency. The ability to meet these criteria will likely result in increased revenue potential
from the CONRAC.
Aesthetics/Visual Impacts/Alternative Uses
Siting of the ~60-foot structure will require sensitivity to the existing context of site. Proximity City Hall, a Historic Terminal,
and residential development will require architectural consideration for massing and material selections. Off Site CONRAC
frees up approximately 10 acres on airport for additional aircraft or vehicle parking.
High Preference Medium Preference Low Preference
AIRPORT MASTER PLAN
Planning Goals:
1.Analyze three CONRAC alternatives and identify differentiating planning considerations.
2.Identify advantages/ disadvantages for each alternative.
3.Confirm Assumptions for on-site CONRAC.
4.Make Recommendation for preferred CONRAC Alternative.
Planning Assumptions:
1.Consider onsite CONRAC and offsite CONRAC locations (as shown on figure).
2.Assess land acquisition requirements at each site.
3.Program and plan will adhere to the Gensler/Walker facility needs assessment, including but not limited
to:
–Plan for 5 level CONRAC that meets PAL 4 (roughly 1.5M square feet/34 acres).
–First level Wash/maintenance, second and third levels Ready/Return and upper levels overflow.
–Customer Service Area and offices attached to CONRAC.
–Existing overflow lot and existing maintenance/wash lots to remain.
4.Consider airport owned shuttle operations and routes for each offsite CONRAC.
5.CONRAC passenger loading to be located north of terminal and not on existing curb.
6.CONRAC passenger drop offs at Customer Service Building in or attached to offsite CONRAC.
Planning Goals and Assumptions
Source: Mead & Hunt
AIRPORT MASTER PLAN
CONRAC Alternative Cost Comparison
Rough-Order-of-Magnitude (ROM) Costs Site 1 (9.3 Acres)Site 2(15.4 Acres)Site 3(27.6 acres)
CONRAC Design/Construction $447,557,000 $447,557,000 $447,557,000
Land Acquisition (700,000 per acre)*$0 $10,780,000 $19,320,000
20-Year Shuttle Bus Operation**$0 $66,725,000 $66,725,000
TOTAL COSTS $447,557,000 $525,062,000 $533,602,000
*Cost per acre based on Appraisal Report for Site 2**Annual Shuttle Bus Operational Costs based on 2019 Ricondo Customer Facility Charge (CFC) Analysis
AIRPORT MASTER PLAN
Development Regulations
Land Use and Zoning Considerations
Setbacks, particularly residential setbacks
Lot coverage requirements
AIRPORT MASTER PLAN
5
35
STORAGE
34
33
32
31
30
29
4
28
27
26
25
24
23 SMALL MARKET22
3
21
READY/ RETURN/
QTA/ SERVICE/
EXIT BOOTHS
20
19
18
17
16
15
2
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
1
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
CONRAC Requirements Anticipated Programming
60’
45’
30’
15’
0
-15’
Source: Walker
Level Acres FACILITY
PAL 4 CONRAC Facility Needs
Storage 523,530 12.02 12.02Small Market Entrant 71,253 1.64 1.64Customer Service Area 13,195 0.30 0.30
Ready 453,688 10.42
20.39Return164,316 3.77
QTA/Service 262,538 6.03
Exit Booths 7,800 0.18
Total 1,496,320 34 34
S.F Acres Acres by Type
AIRPORT MASTER PLAN
Shuttle Circulation
Shuttle Routes were chosen to provide a direct
route to the airport.
Shuttle Routes also chosen to incorporate existing
QTA/ Service facilities on route (Pink)
Passenger loading for each site will occur on north
side of the terminal via El Cielo Rd to prevent rental
vehicles passing by the terminal curb front.
Site 1 – On Airport (No Shuttle)
Site 2 – Off Airport (E Ramon Rd)
Site 3 – Off Airport (N Farrell Rd)
Existing QTA Route
Alternatives
Site Evaluations
Source: Mead & Hunt
AIRPORT MASTER PLAN
Alternative Site
Evaluations
Source: Ricondo CFC Capacity Analysis 2020
Estimated Annual Shuttle Operational Cost
Variation in level of service between the Ricondo south site
analysis (17 min loop) and Site 3 Mead & Hunt analysis (21 min
loop) is not expected to require additional shuttles.
Annual Operational costs are expected to be marginally higher
for fuel and maintenance for the Site 2 and Site 3 of the Mead &
Hunt analysis due to longer routes.
Estimated Shuttle Times
Mead & Hunt Analysis
Site 1 – N/A
Site 2 – 19 Min round trip (2-miles)
Site 3 – 21 min round trip (3.6 miles)
Ricondo CFC Capacity Analysis 2020
South Site via Kirk Douglas Way – 17 Min round
trip (1.3 – Miles)
AIRPORT MASTER PLAN
Site 1 –On Airport –9.3 Acres
Advantages
Shuttle service not required for CONRAC – High Level of Service
Improved user experience
Greater rents/ revenue potential
No additional Property Acquisition or change to existing zoning
Minimizes the need for duplicate infrastructure/ additional stops for future
regional transit connections
Greatest potential for off-peak non- car rental facility parking
No residential land use in direct vicinity
Optimal Building footprint to accommodate anticipated programming
Disadvantages
Additional traffic generation adjacent to the terminal
Fixed site boundaries with limited potential for future expansion outside of
PAL4
Source: Gensler, Mead & Hunt
AIRPORT MASTER PLAN
Site 2 –Off Airport (E Ramon Rd) –15.4 Acres
Source: Mead & Hunt
Advantages
Some potential for off-peak non-rental car facility parking
Traffic generation onto roadway with sufficient capacity (E Ramon Rd)
Additional land available for future development/ expansion outside
of PAL4
Optimal Building footprint to accommodate anticipated programming
Frees up approximately 10 acres of terminal area for other functions
Disadvantages
Shuttle service required for CONRAC – Average Level of Service
Less desirable user experience
Additional operational costs
Property Acquisition, Existing Structure demolition, Zoning Change
from M-1 to A-Aviation.
Residential land use conflicts, with no additional setback
requirements (Medium Density)
Need for duplicate infrastructure/ additional stops for future regional
transit connections
AIRPORT MASTER PLAN
Site 3 –Off Airport (N Farrel Rd) –27.6 Acres
Source: Mead & Hunt
Advantages
Additional land available for future development/ expansion
outside of PAL4
Frees up approximately 10 acres of terminal area for other functions
Disadvantages
Shuttle service required for CONRAC – Poor Level of Service
Least desirable user experience
Highest Additional operational costs
Sub-optimal Building footprint to accommodate anticipated
programming (Narrow footprint)
Property Acquisition, Zoning Change from M-1P I.L to A-Aviation.
Residential land use conflicts, with additional setback requirements
(Low-Density Residential)
Need for duplicate infrastructure/ additional stops for future
regional transit connections
Not desirable for off-peak non-rental car facility parking
AIRPORT MASTER PLAN
Site 1 –Alternative Use 1
AIRPORT MASTER PLAN
Site 1 –Alternative Use 2
AIRPORT MASTER PLAN
Evaluation Matrix Summary
Evaluation Metric Site 1 –On Site Site 2 –Off Site (E
Ramon Road)
Site 3 –Off Site
(N Farrell Road)
Passenger Experience
70+ percent of PSP passengers are leisure travelers who rent vehicles.Proximity to terminal is critically important.
Costs
Up-front capital costs are expected to be similar, but operational costs for shuttle service differentiate on-site vs off-site
alternatives.
Shuttle Route Impacts -Traffic Impacts, Land Use Compatibility
The CONRAC will bring significant traffic generation. The roadway capacity, ingress and egress, and route land use
compatibility (adjacency to residential land uses) all influence site viability.
Rental Car Concessionaire Preference
Rental Car Concessionaires have indicated preference for a site that maximizes passenger experience, lessens operational
costs, and boosts operational efficiency. The ability to meet these criteria will likely result in increased revenue potential
from the CONRAC.
Aesthetics/ Visual Impacts
Siting of the ~60-foot structure will require sensitivity to the existing context of site. Proximity City Hall, a Historic Terminal,
and residential development will require architectural consideration for massing and material selections. Off Site CONRAC
frees up approximately 10 acres on airport for additional aircraft or vehicle parking.
High Preference Medium Preference Low Preference
AIRPORT MASTER PLAN
Master Plan Recommended Concept
Questions
Marketing & Air
Service Update
April 2024
ITEM 8.F
Scheduled Departing Seats
Based on 04/08/24 schedule data, subject to change.
161,190
78,344
70,379 75,637
163,193
85,027
79,601
81,356
147,901
97,154
97,154
95,976
0
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
140,000
160,000
180,000
May June July August
2024 2023 2022
Seats vs. 1 Year Ago % Change
May -1.2%
June -7.9%
July - 11.6%
August - 7.0%
September - 2.2%
October 9.0%
Bar Graph: Left to right: 2024, 2023, 2022
SFO runway construction continues to
reduce summer flights to/from SFO.
Airlines continue to adjust schedules
nationwide due to Boeing 737 MAX
deliveries delays.
Seats start to increase in October,
additional 14,000+ departing seats
compared to one year ago.
February Total Passenger Counts
•382,596 Total Passengers
•Increase of 2.3% over 2023
•New record month!
March Total Passenger Counts
•479,118 Total Passengers
•Increase of 6.4% over 2023
•New record month!
Air Canada
- Toronto and Vancouver: 4/30/24
Alaska
- Boise: 4/14/24
- New York JFK: 4/22/24
Avelo
- Bend/Redmond: 4/28/24
- Eugene: 4/29/24
Delta
- Atlanta: 4/22/24
Flair
- Vancouver: 4/3/24
JetBlue
- New York JFK: 4/30/24
WestJet
- Edmonton: 4/25/24
- Winnipeg: 4/27/24
Seasonal Routes Ending in April
ID Task Name
1
2 Hey Joshua
3 Las Palmas Oasis
4 Cactus to Clouds
5 Las Casuelas & Coachella Valley Coffee
6 InMotion
7 Uptown Essentials
8 The Pink Door
9 Vino Volo
10 Trio
11 Coachella Duty Free Cart
12 Half Moon Empanadas
5/3
5/3
6/7
6/21
8/2
8/30
8/30
11/15
11/22
12/20
1/31
Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb
PSP Concession Projected Opening Dates
Palm Springs International Airport ITEM 8.H
CITY OF PALM SPRINGS
PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Financial Summary
Ending March 31, 2024
Fund 405 - Customer
Facility Charges
FY 23-24
Revised
Budget
FY 23-24
Actual
FY 23-24
% Of Budget
FY 22-23
Actual
FY 22-23
vs
FY 23-24
% Change
Operating Revenue 9,181,327 6,615,536 72%5,449,021 21%
Operating Expenditures 11,780,574 - 0%- 0%
Surplus / (Deficit)(2,599,247) 6,615,536 -255%5,449,021 -21%
Fund 405 is the airports fund for customer facility charges (CFC).
Revenues
CFC revenue is collected by the car rental concessionaires and remitted to the Airport according to state law to support the
future consolidated rental car facility project. In March 2022, City Council approved a change in the collection methodology
rate from $10 per transaction to $9 per day up to five days maximum.
YTD, revenues of $6.6M represents 72% of the full year budget, reflecting seasonal nature of CFC revenues.
Expenditures
Budgeted CFC expenditures include the procurement of 8.06 acres of property south of Kirk Douglas Way for future CONRAC
use as well as CONRAC design costs.
YTD, the airport has not spent any of the Fund 405 budgeted expenditures.
(3,000,000)
(2,000,000)
(1,000,000)
-
1,000,000
2,000,000
3,000,000
4,000,000
5,000,000
6,000,000
7,000,000
(2,599,247)
6,615,536
5,449,021
Fund 405 -Customer Facility Charges -Net Balance
FY 23-24
Revised Budget
FY 23-24
Actual
FY 22-23
Actual
4/11/2024
CITY OF PALM SPRINGS
PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Financial Summary
Ending March 31, 2024
Fund 410 - Passenger
Facility Charges
FY 23-24
Revised
Budget
FY 23-24
Actual
FY 23-24
% Of Budget
FY 22-23
Actual
FY 20-23
vs
FY 21-24
% Change
Operating Revenue 6,450,776 4,516,918 70%4,295,683 5%
Operating Expenditures 9,072,099 340,291 4%446,445 -24%
Surplus / (Deficit)(2,621,323) 4,176,627 -159%3,849,238 9%
Fund 410 is the airports fund for passenger facility charges (PFC).
Revenues
The PFC, provides a source of additional capital to improve, expand, and repair the nation’s airport infrastructure. The FAA
must approve any facility charges imposed on enplaning passengers. The PFC at PSP is $4.50 and the maximum PFC charge
on any one passenger travel ticket is capped at $18.00.
Expenditures
On July 18, 2019, the City of Palm Springs issued 2019 Airport Passenger Facility Charge Revenue Bonds for $22,270,000 to
finance a portion of the design, acquisition, and construction of ticketing hall and baggage handling system improvements.
Interest is payable semiannually on June 1, and December 1 of each year, commencing December 1, 2019, until maturity or
earlier redemption. Fiscal year 2024 principal is $1,690,000 and interest is $807,000. Expenses to fund 410 include principal
and interest and contractual services to the bond consultant.
YTD expenses of $340,291 represents the interest payments for the 2019 bond.
(3,000,000)
(2,000,000)
(1,000,000)
-
1,000,000
2,000,000
3,000,000
4,000,000
5,000,000
1
(2,621,323)
4,176,627 3,849,238
Fund 410 -Passenger Facility Charges -Net Balance
FY 23-24
Revised Budget
FY 23-24
Actual
FY 22-23
Actual
4/11/2024
CITY OF PALM SPRINGS
PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Financial Summary
Ending March 31, 2024
Fund 415 - Airport
Operations &
Maintenance
FY 23-24
Revised Budget
FY 23-24
Actual
FY 23-24
% Of Budget
FY 22-23
Actual
FY 22-23 vs
FY 23-24
% Change
Operating Revenue 64,090,869 31,225,766 49%40,987,968 -24%
Operating Expenditures 51,371,103 22,853,986 44%20,024,023 14%
Surplus / Deficit 12,719,766 8,371,780 66%20,963,945 -60%
Fund 415 is the airports operation & maintenance fund which records for all the revenues and expenditures.
Revenues
Airport revenues included operating and non-operating revenues from airlines, fuel fees, terminal rentals, ground rentals,
concessions, fines, parking, ground transportation, grant reimbursements, admission fees for the Palm Springs Air Museum and
interest income.
Expenditures
Airport expenditures consist of personnel, contractual services, safety and security (Aircraft Rescue and Fire Fighting (ARFF) and
law enforcement), utilities, maintenance, supplies, operating equipment, insurance, employee development, equipment
rentals and repairs.
4/11/2024
CITY OF PALM SPRINGS
PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Financial Summary
Ending March 31, 2024
Fund 415 - Airport
Operations &
Maintenance
FY 23-24
Revised Budget
FY 23-24
Actual
FY 23-24
% Of Budget
FY 22-23
Actual
FY 22-23 vs
FY 23-24
% Change
Operating Revenue
Airline Revenue
Landing Fees 5,910,134 3,695,245 63%2,382,609 55%
Landing Fee Surcharge - (93,778) 0%1,408,495 -107%
Terminal Airline Space/Joint Use 9,467,216 3,900,982 41%1,609,343 142%
Gate Per Use Fees 3,470,605 1,108,220 32%948,970 17%
Passenger Loading Bridge Fee 1,255,064 420,277 33%- 0%
Baggage Handling System Fees 897,000 587,219 65%- 0%
Total Airline Revenues 21,000,019 9,618,165 46%6,349,417 51%
Other Revenue
CARES Act - - 0%5,989,698 -100%
CRRSAA-Airport 4,783,916 1,408,292 29%- 0%
CRRSAA-Concessions 280,390 - 0%280,390 -100%
ARPA-Airport 1,481,290 - 0%9,310,342 -100%
ARPA - Concessions 1,121,560 - 0%(280,390) -100%
Total Other Revenue 7,667,156 1,408,292 18%15,300,040 -91%
Non-Airline Revenue
General Aviation 406,000 245,333 60%260,364 -6%
Non-Aeronautical Ground Rental 457,315 529,504 116%317,424 67%
Aeronautical Ground Rental 1,247,329 932,533 75%1,092,250 -15%
Parking 6,697,064 4,796,864 72%4,695,941 2%
Airport Use Permits 53,263 91,777 172%60,855 51%
Non-Airline Terminal Rent Fee 9,998,816 1,894,326 19%1,587,381 19%
Rental Car - Overflow Parking 371,809 91,958 25%141,634 -35%
Advertising 315,951 334,656 106%327,782 2%
On Airport Rental Car 11,944,780 7,087,358 59%8,029,941 -12%
Commercial Services Fees 1,099,000 803,957 73%766,591 5%
Ground Transportation Fees 1,195,000 913,461 76%765,457 19%
Customs 336,296 280,066 83%279,591 0%
All Other Revenue 1,301,070 2,197,517 169%1,013,299 117%
Total Non-Airline Revenue 35,423,694 20,199,309 57%19,338,511 4%
Total Operating Revenues 64,090,869 31,225,766 49%40,987,968 -24%
4/11/2024
CITY OF PALM SPRINGS
PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Financial Summary
Ending March 31, 2024
YTD actual revenue is $9.7M below the prior year because the prior year YTD included: CARES ACT funding of $6M and ARPA
funding of $6M that will not repeat in the current year. Adjusting for these two items, revenue is up 18% YTD over the prior
Note: FY22-23 had $12M in revenues from one-time CARES & ARPA grant funds
31,225,766
40,987,968
15,316,473
-24%
168%
751%
0
5,000,000
10,000,000
15,000,000
20,000,000
25,000,000
30,000,000
35,000,000
40,000,000
45,000,000
FY 23-24 FY 22-23 FY 20-21
YTD Actual Revenue
Total Airline
Revenues
31%
Total Other
Revenue
4%
Total Non-
Airline
Revenue
65%
FY 23-24 OPERATING FUND REVENUES
BY CATEGORY
4/11/2024
CITY OF PALM SPRINGS
PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Financial Summary
Ending March 31, 2024
Fund 415 - Airport
Operations &
Maintenance
FY 23-24
Budget
FY 23-24
Actual
FY 23-24
% Of Budget
FY 22-23
Actual
FY 22-23 vs FY
23-24
% Change
Operating Expenditures
Airport Administration 8,155,945 3,506,083 43%4,063,101 -14%
Airport Information Technology 1,026,206 339,563 33%27,568
Airport Law Enforcement 3,130,981 2,394,846 76%2,495,838 -4%
Aviation Security 1,936,264 154,043 8%- 0%
Airside Operations 5,981,668 3,773,514 63%346,032 991%
Airport Rescue - Fire 4,828,582 2,748,375 57%2,935,449 -6%
Landside Operations 2,217,250 1,353,486 61%1,198,597 13%
Grounds Maintenance 691,680 277,086 40%452,820 -39%
Terminal Building Operations 8,270,483 3,236,166 39%5,236,497 -38%
Passenger Boarding Bridges 120,000 31,024 26%13,759 125%
Baggage Handling System 897,000 260,644 29%263,016 -1%
Control Center Operations 4,169,247 3,071,521 74%2,782,837 10%
U.S. Customs 336,436 220,182 65%208,507 6%
Planning & Projects 723,776 91,110 13%- 0%
Airport Pass Thru to Others 1,401,950 1,396,342 100%- 0%
PERS Cost Recovery 500,000 - 0%- 0%
Budget Transfer Out 6,983,634 - 0%- 0%
Total Operating Expenditures 51,371,103 22,853,986 44%20,024,023 -14%
Surplus / (Deficit)12,719,766 8,371,780 66%20,963,945 -60%
4/11/2024
CITY OF PALM SPRINGS
PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Financial Summary
Ending March 31, 2024
Airport
Administration
15%Airport Law
Aviation
Security
1%Airside
Operations
17%
Airport
Rescue -
Fire
12%
Landside
Operations
6%Grounds
Maintenance
1%
Terminal
Building
Operations
14%
Control
Center
Operations
13%
U.S.
Customs
1%
Airport Pass
Thru to
Others…
FY 23-24 OPERATING FUND
EXPENDITURES BY DEPARTMENT
22,853,986
20,024,023
12,326,750
14%
62%
441%
-
5,000,000
10,000,000
15,000,000
20,000,000
25,000,000
FY 23-24 FY 22-23 FY 21-22
YTD Actual Expenditures
Salaries &
Benefits
57%
Contractual
Services
18%
Utilities
6%
Materials &
Supplies
8%
Insurance
2%
Other City
Services
9%
FY 23-24 OPERATING FUND
EXPENDITURES BY CATEGORY
4/11/2024
CITY OF PALM SPRINGS
PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Financial Summary
Ending March 31, 2024
Fund 416 - Airport
Capital Projects
FY 23-24
Revised
Budget
FY 23-24
Actual
FY 23-24
% Of Budget
FY 22-23
Actual
FY 20-23
vs
FY 21-24
% Change
Operating Revenue 69,701,796 1,210,529 2%2,568,491 -53%
Operating Expenditures 90,533,365 6,677,792 7%3,917,926 70%
Surplus / (Deficit) (20,831,569) (5,467,263) 26%(1,349,436) 305%
Fund 416 is the airports capital program
Revenues
Airport Improvement Program (AIP) grants are offered to PSP to provide funding assistance for eligible capital
projects that meet the criteria of the federal program. Additional funding is being distributed through AIP grant
program by the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL). These grants have a 9.34% local share and the remaining
90.66% are reimbursed by the FAA. Revenues in excess of the Airport Operations & Maintenance are
transferred to fund 416 to cover capital projects.
Expenditures
The airports Capital Improvement Program and Capital Outlay projects are shown on a separate sheet. Capital
Outlay are capital projects that are under $300,000. Under the new the AULA, the airlines will be charged
amortization for certain capital projects to help recover its portion of funds used for capital assets. A capital
expenditure is any single item that costs $300,000 or more with a useful life in excess of three years, including
planning studies, environmental studies, and environmental mitigation measures.
YTD there is a deficit of $5.4M. At the end of the year, fund 415 will transfer the surplus to the capital account
to fund the deficit. We expect revenue to be $M below budget $85M below budget due to the pus out of
associated capital projects. The corresponding expenses for the pushed out projects will also be deferred to
future fiscal years.
(25,000,000)
(20,000,000)
(15,000,000)
(10,000,000)
(5,000,000)
-
(20,831,569)
(5,467,263)
(1,349,436)
Fund 416 - Airport Capital Projects - Net Balance
FY 23-24
Revised Budget
FY 23-24
Actual
FY 22-23
Actual
4/11/2024
CITY OF PALM SPRINGS
PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Financial Summary
Ending March 31, 2024
Cash Summary FY 23-24
Actual
FY 22-23
Actual
Fund 405 44,720,037 34,728,820
Fund 410 3,264,136 2,781,915
Fund 415 Unrestricted Sub-Total 11,256,400 29,371,372
Fund 416 363,718 5,863,070
44,720,037
3,264,136
11,256,400
363,718
34,728,820
2,781,915
29,371,372
5,863,070
-
5,000,000
10,000,000
15,000,000
20,000,000
25,000,000
30,000,000
35,000,000
40,000,000
45,000,000
50,000,000
Fund 405 Fund 410 Fund 415 Unrestricted
Sub-Total
Fund 416
Cash by Fund
FY 23-24
Actual
FY 22-23
Actual
4/11/2024
CITY OF PALM SPRINGS
PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Financial Summary
Ending March 31, 2024
Grant Type
Expiration Date
Grant
Awarded by
the FAA to the
Airport
Actual Used
as of 3/31/24
Remaining
Actual Unused
Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES) -
Expires - May 10, 2024 11,067,877 11,067,877 -
Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations
(CRRSA)- Airport Operations
Expires - April 14, 2025 4,785,805 4,785,805 -
Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations
(CRRSA)- Concessions
Expires - May 31, 2025 280,390 280,390 -
American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (ARPA) - Concession
Expires - May 31, 2025 1,121,560 1,121,560 -
American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (ARPA) - Airport Operations
Expires - August 10, 2025 10,791,632 10,791,632 - Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL)*
Expires - 2027 15,918,762 - 15,918,762
Total Grants 43,966,026 28,047,264 15,918,762
Note: The BIL grant is allocated to the inbound baggage claim project
Coronavirus
Aid, Relief,
and
Economic
Security Act
(CARES) -
Expires -
May 10,
2024
Coronavirus
Response
and Relief
Supplementa
l
Appropriatio
ns (CRRSA)-
Airport
Operations
Expires -
April 14,
2025
Coronavirus
Response
and Relief
Supplementa
l
Appropriatio
ns (CRRSA)-
Concessions
Expires -
May 31,
2025
American
Rescue Plan
Act of 2021
(ARPA) -
Concession
Expires -
May 31,
2025
American
Rescue Plan
Act of 2021
(ARPA) -
Airport
Operations
Expires -
August 10,
2025
Bipartisan
Infrastructur
e Law (BIL)*
Expires -
2027
Grant Awarded by the FAA to the Airport 11,067,877 4,785,805 280,390 1,121,560 10,791,632 15,918,762
Actual Used as of 3/31/24 11,067,877 4,785,805 280,390 1,121,560 10,791,632 -
Remaining Actual Unused -----15,918,762
$11,067,877.0
$4,785,805.0
$280,390.0 $1,121,560.0
$10,791,632.0
$15,918,762.0
$0
$2,000,000
$4,000,000
$6,000,000
$8,000,000
$10,000,000
$12,000,000
$14,000,000
$16,000,000
$18,000,000
Grants -Remaining Balance
4/11/2024
CITY OF PALM SPRINGS
PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Financial Summary
Ending March 31, 2024
NO. OF
PROJECTS PROJECT NAME
BUDGET
FY 2021-2022
BUDGET
FY 2022-2023
BUDGET
FY 2023-2024
BUDGET
FY 2024-2025
PRIOR
EXPENSES
EXPENSES TO
DATE REMAINING FUNDING SOURCE
-
1 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS 29,205,802 - - - - - 29,205,802
2 AIRFIELD 31L/13R REHABILITATION & AIRFIELD CONNECTOR - (DESIGN)- - - 1,500,000 - - 1,500,000 Airport / ACIP Grant
3 AIRFIELD W & A1 - (CONSTRUCT - PHASE 1)- - - 6,500,000 - - 6,500,000 Airport / ACIP / BIL-AIG Grant
4 AUTOMATED EXIT LANES - - - 750,000 - - 750,000 Airport
5 BHS - TERMINAL BUILDING EXPANSION (CONSTRUCT)- - - 25,000,000 - - 25,000,000 PFC
6 CARPET REPLACEMENT - MAIN TERMINAL LOBBY AND SECURITY CHECK POINT - - 400,000 - - - 400,000 Airport
7 CONSOLIDATED RENTAL CAR FACILITY (DESIGN)- - - 2,500,000 - - 2,500,000 CFC
8 CONVEYANCE REPLACEMENT - - - 4,700,000 - - 4,700,000 Airport / BIL-ATP Grant
9 ECONOMY LOT (CONSTRUCT) - PHASE 1 - - - 3,000,000 - 27,730 3,000,000 Airport
10 ECONOMY LOT (CONSTRUCT) - PHASE 2 - - - 3,000,000 - - 3,000,000 Airport
11 FEDERAL INSPECTION STATION - (DESIGN) & NEW TERMINAL EXPANSION - - - 19,000,000 - 105,000 19,000,000 Airport / BIL - Entitlement Grant
12 HVAC INFRASTRUCTURE REPLACEMENT - - - 2,000,000 - - 2,000,000 Airport / BIL-ATP Grant
13 LED RIBBON - (15,978) Airport
14 LOT A (CONSTRUCT) - - - 700,000 - - 700,000 Airport
15 MAIN TERMINAL FAÇADE RESTORATION (DESIGN)- - - 500,000 - - 500,000 Airport
16 PAINT STRIPING TRUCK - - 1,000,000 - - - 1,000,000 Airport
17 PARKING REVENUE SYSTEM - - 500,000 - - - 500,000 Airport
18 PROCURE LANDSIDE VEHICLES - - 210,000 - - 67,772 210,000 Airport / VALE/ZEV Grant
19 PROCURE TWO ZERO EMISSIONS BUSES - - - 2,000,000 - - 2,000,000 Airport / VALE/ZEV Grant
20 PROPERTY ACQUISITION - - 8,800,000 - - - 8,800,000 CFC
21 REMAIN OVER NIGHT (RON) PARKING SPACES - - - 4,000,000 - - 4,000,000 Airport / ACIP Grant
22 SHADE AREA - PHASE 1 - - 236,000 - - 55,717.62 236,000 Airport / VGPS Grant
23 SOLID SEPARATOR - - 100,000 - - - 100,000 Airport
24 TELEHANDLER/FORKLIFT - - 150,000 - - - 150,000 Airport
25 VERBIAGE MESSAGE SIGNAGE - DIGITAL - - 800,000 - - - 800,000 Airport
26 WI-FI CONSULTANT (DESIGN)- - 150,000 - - - 150,000 Airport
27 AIRCRAFT RESCUE & FIREFIGHTING TRUCK - - - 1,500,000 1,127,610 1,127,610 1,500,000 Airport
28 AUTOMATED VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION 300,000 - - - 138,192 138,192 300,000 Airport
29 COMMON USE 225,860 2,777,514 - - 1,322,121 1,493,566 3,386,352 Airport
30 EV CHARGER - - 300,000 - 295,708 295,708 300,000 Airport / ACIP
31 GATE STRIPING - - 599,900 - 599,900 599,900 599,900 Airport
32 HOT SPOT STUDY - - 181,320 - 53,283 53,283 181,320 ACIP
33 INBOUND BAGGAGE CLAIM - - 6,000,000 12,000,000 326,915 406,339 18,006,261 Airport / BIL - ATP Grant
34 MASTER PLAN - - 2,275,816 - 680,937 781,056 2,312,522 ACIP
35 OUTBOUND BAGGAGE HANDLING SYSTEM - - 20,000,000 10,000,000 540,106 540,106 30,106,656 Airport / ACIP / PFC
36 PUBLIC PARKING PAVING - - 2,400,000 - 1,523 1,523 2,400,000 Airport
37 PUBLIC RESTROOMS - - 10,000,000 - 29,028 39,080 10,006,261 Airport / BIL - ATP Grant
38 TAXIWAY REHABILIATION W & A1 - - 571,158 - 53,394 78,063 571,158 ACIP
39 WIFI WIRELESS EQUIPMENT - - 500,000 - 5,474 5,474 801,074 Airport
40 WILDLIFE HAZARD ASSESSEMENT - - 126,924 - 15,044 13,641 154,840 ACIP
TOTAL 29,731,661 2,777,514 60,300,006 100,150,000 10,378,470 11,018,998 164,605,253
4/11/2024
Palm Springs International Airport
MONTHLY PASSENGER ACTIVITY REPORT - 2024
2024 2023 % Change 2024 2023 % Change 2024 2023 % Change
January 167,926 169,746 -1.1%168,852 171,910 -1.8%336,778 341,656 -1.4%
February 186,052 184,973 0.6%196,544 188,877 4.1%382,596 373,850 2.3%
March 244,619 223,314 9.5%234,499 226,832 3.4%479,118 450,146 6.4%
April 200,753 -100.0%178,600 -100.0%- 379,353 -100.0%
May 129,695 -100.0%116,491 -100.0%- 246,186 -100.0%
June 71,635 -100.0%66,826 -100.0%- 138,461 -100.0%
July 63,647 -100.0%60,689 -100.0%- 124,336 -100.0%
August 59,309 -100.0%59,947 -100.0%- 119,256 -100.0%
September 73,813 -100.0%77,748 -100.0%- 151,561 -100.0%
October 126,702 -100.0%133,106 -100.0%- 259,808 -100.0%
November 162,180 -100.0%165,290 -100.0%- 327,470 -100.0%
December 158,245 -100.0%166,997 -100.0%- 325,242 -100.0%
Year to Date 598,597 1,624,012 3.6%599,895 1,613,313 2.1%1,198,492 3,237,325 2.8%
Enplaned Deplaned Total Passengers
ITEM 12.APage 1 of 4
Palm Springs International Airport
Best Month Comparison
ENPLANEMENTS
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Vs Best Mo
Jan 136,157 39,614 118,204 169,746 167,926 -1.1%
Feb 156,909 57,530 142,206 184,973 186,052 0.6%
Mar 113,166 107,577 202,993 223,314 244,619 9.5%
Apr 5,811 111,376 185,946 200,753 -100.0%
May 10,751 92,820 123,736 129,695 -100.0%
Jun 14,827 66,885 73,861 71,635 -100.0%
Jul 17,231 65,869 68,071 63,647 -100.0%
Aug 18,389 58,793 65,368 59,309 -100.0%
Sep 23,087 65,682 79,599 73,813 -100.0%
Oct 41,597 108,923 120,659 126,702 -100.0%
Nov 52,874 135,677 160,129 162,180 -100.0%
Dec 41,517 136,897 159,846 158,245 -100.0%
TOTAL 632,316 1,047,643 1,500,618 1,624,012 598,597
% Chg.-50.89%65.68%43.24%8.22%
TOTAL PASSENGERS
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Vs Best Mo
Jan 276,099 79,082 237,388 341,656 336,778 -1.4%
Feb 320,906 120,657 292,336 373,850 382,596 2.3%
Mar 198,850 214,477 403,883 450,146 479,118 6.4%
Apr 10,082 215,777 358,115 379,353 -100.0%
May 19,154 174,535 233,239 246,186 -100.0%
Jun 28,748 129,872 142,524 138,461 -100.0%
Jul 33,776 129,463 133,664 124,336 -100.0%
Aug 36,482 117,952 129,952 119,256 -100.0%
Sep 47,915 136,666 162,834 151,561 -100.0%
Oct 88,777 225,991 247,457 259,808 -100.0%
Nov 108,043 271,944 319,237 327,470 -100.0%
Dec 83,262 276,527 321,215 325,242 -100.0%
TOTAL 1,252,094 2,092,943 2,981,844 3,237,325 1,198,492
% Chg.51.17%67.16%42.47%8.57%
Page 2 of 4
Palm Springs International Airport
ACTIVITY BY AIRLINE
MARCH 2024
(E & D)
AIRLINES 2024 2023 % Change 2024 2023 % Change 2024 2023 % Change Market Share
Air Canada 8,366 6,041 38.5%7,397 6,073 21.8%15,763 12,114 30.1%3.3%
Alaska 43,343 40,781 6.3%44,485 42,652 4.3%87,828 83,433 5.3%18.3%
American 34,401 30,378 13.2%32,174 29,579 8.8%66,575 59,957 11.0%13.9%
Avelo 3,870 3,111 24.4%3,888 3,401 14.3%7,758 6,512 19.1%1.6%
Delta Air 27,690 17,928 54.5%20,850 18,152 14.9%48,540 36,080 34.5%10.1%
Mesa (AA)- 2,185 -100.0%- 1,889 -100.0%- 4,074 -100.0%0.0%
SkyWest (Delta Connection)6,147 6,052 1.6%6,177 6,117 1.0%12,324 12,169 1.3%2.6%
SkyWest (United Express)10,408 12,385 -16.0%9,825 11,894 -17.4%20,233 24,279 -16.7%4.2%
SkyWest (AA)5,692 1,796 216.9%5,132 1,662 208.8%10,824 3,458 213.0%2.3%
Southwest Air 39,475 36,754 7.4%39,636 38,854 2.0%79,111 75,608 4.6%16.5%
United 29,272 26,630 9.9%28,094 27,183 3.4%57,366 53,813 6.6%12.0%
WestJet 23,121 24,545 -5.8%23,235 24,559 -5.4%46,356 49,104 -5.6%9.7%
Allegiant Air 2,766 4,125 -32.9%3,003 4,217 -28.8%5,769 8,342 -30.8%1.2%
Flair 1,445 2,288 -36.8%1,555 2,047 -24.0%3,000 4,335 -30.8%0.6%
JetBlue 3,422 3,804 -10.0%3,586 3,909 -8.3%7,008 7,713 -9.1%1.5%
MN Airlines (Sun Country)5,201 4,511 15.3%5,462 4,644 17.6%10,663 9,155 16.5%2.2%
Charters - - 0.0%- - 0.0%- - 0.0%0.0%
TOTAL 244,619 223,314 9.5%234,499 226,832 3.4%479,118 450,146 6.4%100.0%
Enplaned Deplaned Total
Page 3 of 4
Palm Springs International Airport
Airlines Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun FYTD
Air Canada - - - 335 5,670 5,059 5,595 6,330 8,366 31,355
Alaska 11,339 9,923 11,493 25,541 30,823 30,980 31,030 35,114 43,343 229,586
American 13,695 14,400 15,596 20,342 23,979 22,963 23,536 27,581 34,401 196,493
Avelo Air - - - - 2,477 2,528 2,498 2,889 3,870 14,262
Delta Air - - 392 3,945 5,840 11,659 16,245 16,444 27,690 82,215
SkyWest (Delta Connection)4,267 4,070 5,050 5,668 5,403 5,466 5,415 5,799 6,147 47,285
SkyWest (United Express)8,606 8,448 9,630 7,470 8,324 7,057 8,416 8,360 10,408 76,719
SkyWest (American Air)3,691 2,630 3,055 5,390 5,314 3,887 4,784 4,400 5,692 38,843
Southwest Air 17,851 15,667 19,382 25,155 29,421 25,412 29,154 29,022 39,475 230,539
United 4,656 17,089 20,427 19,345 19,643 22,654 29,272 133,086
WestJet 4,198 4,171 4,058 11,646 16,585 16,441 16,592 19,532 23,121 116,344
Allegiant Air - - - 1,331 1,457 1,173 1,175 1,679 2,766 9,581
Flair 1,445 1,445
JetBlue - - - 175 3,284 2,640 404 1,627 3,422 11,552
MN Airlines (Sun Country)- - 501 2,615 3,176 3,635 3,439 4,621 5,201 23,188
Charters - - - - - - - - -
TOTAL ENPLANED 63,647 59,309 73,813 126,702 162,180 158,245 167,926 186,052 244,619 - - - 1,242,493
DEPLANED PASSENGERS
Airlines Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun FYTD
Air Canada - - - 533 5,771 5,293 5,267 6,477 7,397 30,738
Alaska 10,590 10,605 12,779 27,568 30,674 31,911 30,481 37,102 44,485 236,195
American 13,171 14,104 15,246 20,434 24,029 24,431 24,617 29,068 32,174 197,274
Avelo Air 2,560 2,553 2,486 2,977 3,888 14,464
Delta Air 671 3,917 5,840 13,161 16,443 17,936 20,850 78,818
SkyWest (Delta Connection)3,959 3,996 5,299 5,741 5,467 5,416 5,936 5,933 6,177 47,924
SkyWest (United Express)8,016 8,498 10,039 7,711 8,827 7,852 7,922 8,774 9,825 77,464
SkyWest (American Air)3,492 2,666 2,997 5,463 5,120 3,818 4,108 3,884 5,132 36,680
Southwest Air 17,428 16,060 20,799 25,891 30,654 28,082 28,435 30,944 39,636 237,929
United 4,971 17,220 20,384 20,040 19,723 23,233 28,094 133,665
WestJet 4,033 4,018 4,366 13,554 17,883 16,173 18,053 21,323 23,235 122,638
Allegiant Air 1,728 1,468 1,129 1,151 1,859 3,003 10,338
Flair 1,555 1,555
JetBlue 322 3,143 3,173 353 1,742 3,586 12,319
MN Airlines (Sun Country)581 3,024 3,470 3,965 3,877 5,292 5,462 25,671
Charters - - - - - - - - - - - - -
TOTAL DEPLANED 60,689 59,947 77,748 133,106 165,290 166,997 168,852 196,544 234,499 - - - 1,263,672
TOTAL E & D 124,336 119,256 151,561 259,808 327,470 325,242 336,778 382,596 479,118 - - - 2,506,165
ENPLANED & DEPLANED PASSENGERS - FY 2023 2024
ENPLANED PASSENGERS
Page 4 of 4
Palm Springs International Airport
PASSENGER ACTIVITY REPORT - FISCAL YEAR COMPARISON
FY '23-'24 % CHANGE FY '22-'23 % CHANGE FY '21-'22 % CHANGE FY '20 -'21 FY '23 -'24 % CHANGE FY '22-'23 % CHANGE FY '21-'22 % CHANGE FY '20 -'21 FY '23-'24 % CHANGE FY '22-'23 % CHANGE FY '21-'22 % CHANGE FY '20 -'21
July 63,647 -6%68,071 3%65,869 282%17,231 60,689 -7%65,593 3%63,594 284%16,545 124,336 -7%133,664 3%129,463 283%33,776
August 59,309 -9%65,368 11%58,793 220%18,389 59,947 -7%64,584 9%59,159 227%18,093 119,256 -8%129,952 10%117,952 223%36,482
September 73,813 -7%79,599 21%65,682 184%23,087 77,748 -7%83,235 17%70,984 186%24,828 151,561 -7%162,834 19%136,666 185%47,915
October 126,702 5%120,659 11%108,923 162%41,597 133,106 5%126,798 8%117,068 148%47,180 259,808 5%247,457 9%225,991 155%88,777
November 162,180 1%160,129 18%135,677 157%52,874 165,290 4%159,108 17%136,267 147%55,169 327,470 3%319,237 17%271,944 152%108,043
December 158,245 -1%159,846 17%136,897 230%41,517 166,997 3%161,369 16%139,630 234%41,745 325,242 1%321,215 16%276,527 232%83,262
January 167,926 -1%169,746 44%118,204 198%39,614 168,852 -2%171,910 44%119,184 202%39,468 336,778 -1%341,656 44%237,388 200%79,082
February 186,052 1%184,973 30%142,206 147%57,530 196,544 4%188,877 26%150,130 138%63,127 382,596 2%373,850 28%292,336 142%120,657
March 244,619 10%223,314 10%202,993 89%107,577 234,499 3%226,832 13%200,890 88%106,900 479,118 6%450,146 11%403,883 88%214,477
April -100%200,753 8%185,946 67%111,376 -100%178,600 4%172,169 65%104,401 - -100%379,353 6%358,115 66%215,777
May -100%129,695 5%123,736 33%92,820 -100%116,491 6%109,503 34%81,715 - -100%246,186 6%233,239 34%174,535
June -100%71,635 -3%73,861 10%66,885 -100%66,826 -3%68,663 9%62,987 - -100%138,461 -3%142,524 10%129,872
YTD 1,242,493 -24%1,633,788 15%1,418,787 112%670,497 1,263,672 -22%1,610,223 14%1,407,241 113%662,158 2,506,165 -23%3,244,011 15%2,826,028 112%1,332,655
ENPLANED PASSENGERS DEPLANED PASSENGERS TOTAL PASSENGERS
ITEM 12.B