HomeMy WebLinkAbout2022-09-21 AIRPORT COMMISSION AGENDA
11.
AIRPORT COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA
Wednesday, September 21, 2022 - 5:30 P.M.
Pursuant to Assembly Bill 361, this meeting will be conducted by teleconference and there will be no
in-person public access to the meeting location.
Submit your public comment to the Airport Commission electronically. Material may be emailed
to: Christina.brown@palmspringsca.gov - Transmittal prior to the start of the meeting is required.
Any correspondence received during or after the meeting will be distributed to the Airport
Commission and retained for the official record.
To provide public comments at the meeting, please use the following link
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/86019815290?pwd=ZitOZDIyeGZhNUNEQTVkU29nTUdPdz09
or call (669) 900-6833 and enter Meeting ID: 860 1981 5290 - Passcode: 583916
City of Palm Springs: Riverside County:
Vacant
City of Cathedral City:
Vacant
City of Palm Desert:
Kevin Wiseman Aftab Dada - Chair David Feltman
Kevin J. Corcoran
Vice Chair
Ken Hedrick City of Indian Wells:
Paul Budilo
City of Coachella:
Gabriel Martin
City of Rancho Mirage:
Thomas Weil Gerald Adams Scott G. Miller
Patricia Breslin John Payne City of La Quinta:
Kathleen Hughes
City of Desert Hot Springs:
Jan Pye
City of Indio:
Jhan Schmitz Todd Burke M. Guillermo Suero
Palm Springs City Staff
Teresa Gallavan Harry Barrett Jr., A.A.E.
Interim City Manager Airport Executive Director
1. CALL TO ORDER – PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
2. POSTING OF AGENDA
3. ROLL CALL
4. ACCEPTANCE OF AGENDA
5. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Limited to three minutes on any subject within the purview of
the Commission
6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Minutes of the Airport Commission Regular Meeting of
July 20, 2022
7. INTRODUCTIONS AND PRESENTATIONS
8. CITY MANAGER REPORT
Airport Commission Meeting Agenda
September 21, 2022 – Page 2
_______________________________________________________________________________________
9. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS:
9.A Training re: Brown Act and Commissioner Roles and Responsibilities
9.B Baggage Handling System Update
9.C Operations, Properties and Facilities Committee Update
10. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT:
10.A Marketing Update
10.B Financial Summary Update
10.C Projects and Airport Capital Improvement Program Update
10.D Strategic Planning Session Update
11. COMMISSIONERS REQUESTS AND REPORTS
12. REPORT OF COUNCIL ACTIONS:
12.A Past City Council Actions
12.B Future City Council Actions
13. RECEIVE AND FILE:
13.A Airline Activity Report July & August 2022
13.B Airline Activity Report Fiscal Year Comparison
13.C Airlines Schedules September & October 2022
14. COMMITTEES:
14.A Future Committee Meetings
ADJOURNMENT:
The Airport Commission will adjourn to a Special Meeting on September 27, 2022, at
12:30 P.M.
Airport Commission Meeting Agenda
September 21, 2022 – Page 3
_______________________________________________________________________________________
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
I, Harry Barrett, Jr., Airport Executive Director, City of Palm Springs, California, hereby
certify this agenda was posted on September 15, 2022, in accordance with established
policies and procedures.
PUBLIC NOTICES
Pursuant to G.C. Section 54957.5(b)(2) the designated office for inspection of records in
connection with the meeting is the Office of the City Clerk, City Hall, 3200 E. Tahquitz
Canyon Way. Complete Agenda Packets are available for public inspection at: City Hall
Office of the City Clerk. Agenda and staff reports are available on the City’s website
www.palmspringsca.gov. If you would like additional information on any item appearing on
this agenda, please contact the Office of the City Clerk at
(760) 323-8204.
It is the intention of the City of Palm Springs to comply with the Americans with Disabilities
Act (ADA) in all respects. If, as an attendee or a participant at this meeting, or in meetings
on a regular basis, you will need special assistance beyond what is normally provided, the
City will attempt to accommodate you in every reasonable manner. Please contact the
Department of Aviation, (760) 318-3800, at least 48 hours prior to the meeting to inform us
of your particular needs and to determine if accommodation is feasible.
Page 1 of 9
AIRPORT COMMISSION
ACTION SUMMARY MINUTES OF REGULAR ADJOURNED MEETING
Wednesday, July 20, 2022 – 5:30 P.M.
_____________________________________________________________________
1.CALL TO ORDER:
Chairman Dada called the Airport Commission Meeting to order at 5:30 P.M. and he
invited Commissioner Breslin to lead the Pledge of Allegiance. The meeting was held
via videoconference.
2.POSTING OF THE AGENDA: Posted on July 14, 2022.
3.ROLL CALL:
Commissioners Present:
Gerald Adams (Palm Springs) Gabriel Martin (Coachella)
Patricia Breslin (Palm Springs) Scott G. Miller (Palm Springs)
Paul Budilo (Indian Wells) John Payne (Palm Springs)
Todd Burke (Palm Springs) Jill Philbrook (Cathedral City)
Kevin Corcoran (Palm Springs) – Vice Chair Jan Pye (Desert Hot Springs)
Aftab Dada (Palm Springs) - Chair M. Guillermo Suero (Palm Springs)
David Feltman (Palm Springs) Thomas Weil (Rancho Mirage)
Ken Hedrick (Palm Springs) Kevin Wiseman (Palm Desert)
Commissioners Absent: Kathleen Hughes (La Quinta) and Jhan Schmitz (Indio)
Staff Present:
Harry Barrett, Jr., Airport Executive Director
Daniel Meier, Deputy Director of Aviation, Marketing and Air Service
Victoria Carpenter, Airport Administration Manager
Christina Brown, Executive Administrative Assistant
4.ACCEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA:
ACTION: Accept the Agenda as presented. Moved by Commissioner Feltman,
seconded Commissioner Hedrick and unanimously approved noting the
absence of Commissioners Hughes and Schmitz.
5.PUBLIC COMMENTS: None
ITEM 6
Palm Springs Airport Commission
Action Summary Minutes of Regular Adjourned Meeting
July 20, 2022
______________________________________________________________________
Page 2 of 9
6. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES:
ACTION: Approve the minutes of the Airport Commission Meeting of June 15, 2022.
Moved by Vice Chairman Corcoran, seconded Commissioner Weil and
unanimously approved noting the absence of Commissioners Hughes and
Schmitz.
Chairman Dada noted that there were several Commissioners including himself and
a staff member that had requested that the Commission try to wrap up the meeting as
early as possible so that they could attend family commitments.
7. INTRODUCTIONS AND PRESENTATIONS: None
8. CITY MANAGER REPORT: None
9. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS:
9.A Operations, Properties and Facilities Committee Update
This item was not discussed.
10. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT:
Items 10.A, 10.B, and 10.C were heard after Items 10.D and 10.E.
10.A Projects Update and Airport Capital Improvement Program Update
Airport Executive Director Barrett reported that V-1 Consulting who is the consultant
that is analyzing the airports outbound baggage handling system (BHS) had provided
airport staff some high-level initial insights and observations on the BHS performance,
and they provided their recommendations for short-term, medium-term, and long-term
solutions to the problems that the BHS had had over the spring of this year. Mr. Barrett
said that the problem was the design of the system, and he said that there were
physical constraints that were making it challenging for the system to deliver bags to
the TSA screening machines and past the clear line and out to the carousel. He said
that staff had a sense of what some of the issues were, and that staff had also learned
that there was an issue with some of the belts that were being used on the BHS, issues
with the sensors and where the sensors were placed, and the merged logic of the
BHS.
Mr. Barrett said that after having discussions with V-1 Consulting and the airlines, it
was concluded that the airport was likely to be in the same situation in terms of the
outbound baggage issues that the airport had in the spring. He said that the airport
staff was developing a plan to mitigate the situation for this spring which would include
Palm Springs Airport Commission
Action Summary Minutes of Regular Adjourned Meeting
July 20, 2022
______________________________________________________________________
Page 3 of 9
adding more personnel through a contract with Sierra Aviation Group, some
modifications to TSA’s procedure for screening the bags, and improving
communications with the resorts and the public so that passengers are aware of when
they need to arrive at the airport for their flights. Mr. Barrett said that staff would need
to move quickly on the medium-term and long-term solutions because the short-term
solutions were only going to get the airport thought a year or two at most, and he said
that the airport would likely need to go into another construction project to remedy the
current outbound BHS and that staff was currently working with V-1 Consulting, TSA
and the FAA to start developing a plan.
Commissioner Feltman asked what the timeframe was that passengers would be told
to be at the airport before their flight departure time. Mr. Barrett said that currently,
passengers were being instructed to arrive at the airport two hours ahead of the
departure time. Commissioner Feltman said that he felt that two hours was bad for the
airports brand because PSP is known for being an easy airport to navigate. Mr. Barrett
clarified that passengers need to arrive at the airport two hours ahead of the departure
time during the peak season and peak hours which are between 5:30 a.m. to 7:30
a.m. and 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. Commissioner Payne asked if a passenger with a
5:30 a.m. flight would need to be at the airport at 3:30 a.m. Mr. Barrett confirmed that
a passenger with a 5:30 a.m. flight would have to plan to be at the airport at 3:30 a.m.
or 4:00 a.m., particularly if it is a mainline flight. Commissioner Wiseman asked if there
would be airline staff to check the baggage in at that time. Mr. Barrett said that the
airlines are staffing the ticket counters accordingly, and TSA is opening the checkpoint
and screening area at 4:00 a.m. Commissioner Miller said that he believed that the
situation was going to be a nightmare in terms of advertising and customer
satisfaction. Commissioner Payne requested that an Operations, Properties and
Facilities Committee meeting be scheduled to further discuss the matter.
Vice Chairman Corcoran asked if any of the vendors would be liable for the lack of
performance. Mr. Barrett said that he has been looking into the matter, as well as the
City Attorney, City Manager, and V-1 Consulting and that they were trying to determine
what analysis went into the design. Commissioner Miller said that he felt that it would
get ugly if the news media were to get ahold of this information. Chairman Dada
respectfully noted that the City Council was aware of the situation and that the City
Manager was working to keep the City Council updated. Commissioner Suero noted
that this wasn’t the first time that the airlines have had to advise passengers to arrive
two hours before their departure time. Mr. Barrett confirmed that from February 2022
to May 2022, the airport and airlines were advising passengers to arrive two hours
before their departure time. Chairman Dada asked Mr. Barrett if the discussion could
be continued at the next Operations, Properties and Facilities meeting which Mr.
Barrett was agreeable.
Commissioner Budilo noted that two weeks ago, he had met with the Indian Wells
resort managers, he said that the resort managers voiced their concern in regard to
Indian Wells visitors not having a good customer experience at the airport, and he
Palm Springs Airport Commission
Action Summary Minutes of Regular Adjourned Meeting
July 20, 2022
______________________________________________________________________
Page 4 of 9
said that he didn’t believe that asking passengers to arrive two hours early was going
to be acceptable. Chairman Dada said that he respected Commissioner Budilo’s
comments, he said that the situation was beyond the Commission’s power and control,
and he emphasized that the airport staff was working behind the scenes to determine
if some of the blame and liability could be shifted elsewhere. Chairman Dada also said
that an update on the situation would be provided to the resort managers in
September. Mr. Barrett said that the airport staff had been working for several months
with an army of people on this issue, he said that staff was adapting as new
information was learned, and he said that he was hopeful that the situation would be
better than it was last spring. Commissioner Payne inquired about the cost of the
current BHS. Mr. Barrett said that he believed that the BHS cost approximately $7
million, and the entire baggage claim project cost approximately $36 million.
10.B Common Use Update
Mr. Barrett provided a presentation of the concept design for the Bono and RJ
Concourse Gate Podium Millwork project, and he said that the idea of the project was
to create some flexibility in aircraft parking so that the airport could accommodate the
peaks as they come, and to modernize the Bono concourse.
Commissioner Payne asked if there would be any opportunities to incorporate
automation biometric boarding or anything on the technology side that would further
reduce the need for personnel. Mr. Barrett confirmed that there was an opportunity to
capture additional technology, he noted that it could be challenging getting the airlines
to agree on a technology that could be functional across the board, and he said that
staff was working with the airlines to get that figured out. Commissioner Payne asked
if common use was agreed to by the airlines or if it was a part of the negotiation of the
lease agreement with the airlines. Mr. Barrett said the common use was agreed to by
the airlines, and he said that staff was also using the common use as a revenue
generator in the new lease agreement negotiations.
Commissioner Adams referred to the airport having a historic designation, he asked if
there was any way to get local input on mid-century modern designs for the common
use design, and he noted that the design colors that had been presented were not
mid-century modern colors. Mr. Barrett said that staff would work on getting input for
mid-century modern designs, he said that a mock-up would be created for the airlines
and the Commissioners to view, and he encouraged the Commissioners to submit
their suggestions for colors and materials to staff. Commissioner Adams suggested
that staff speak to other commissions, and he said that the art museum could get staff
in touch with experts that could help staff make decisions that would really reflect the
authenticity of the airport’s historic status.
Palm Springs Airport Commission
Action Summary Minutes of Regular Adjourned Meeting
July 20, 2022
______________________________________________________________________
Page 5 of 9
10.C Strategic Planning Session Update
Chairman Dada noted that the City Manager had resigned, and the commission would
be dark in August. Chairman Dada said that electronic communication would be used
to communicate the next steps for the strategic planning session to the
commissioners, and he said that the next steps would be communicated to the
commissioners after the City makes their announcement on Monday about the filling
of the city manager position.
Commissioner Payne asked for confirmation that a date had been set for the strategic
planning session meeting. Airport Executive Administrative Assistant Brown
confirmed that the strategic planning session was scheduled for Tuesday, September
27th which could change depending on the City Council’s announcement, and she
encouraged the commissioners to submit their topics for the strategic planning session
agenda.
Commissioner Miller said that his concern was that at the City Council dinner, the City
Council gave each commission very specific topics to bring back to them, and he said
that he was wondering how the commission would meld the timeframe with eight
different topics that the City Council wanted the commission to comment on. Chairman
Dada asked that the Commission patiently wait until Monday for further instruction.
Commissioner Miller questioned if the city manager’s participation was crucial for the
Commission’s goal setting meeting, he said that he could see how the participation of
the airport executive director is crucial and that he wasn’t as convinced that a city
manager is as crucial because he feels that Airport Executive Director Barrett can
represent senior management fairly well. Commissioner Miller said that the
Commission had been discussing the need for a strategic planning session since he
was appointed to the Commission a year ago, and he said that he was frustrated.
Chairman Dada said that he respected Commissioner Miller’s frustration, he
apologized for Commissioner Miller’s frustration, and he said that he had been given
strict guidelines to include the City Manager in the strategic planning session, and he
noted the Airport Commission is not the decision maker and that the Commission
advises the airport staff, and the Commission provides their feedback. Chairman Dada
said that the ultimate decision makers are the City Manager and the City Council.
Commissioner Payne asked if Chairman Dada had been instructed by the City
Manager and City Council to delay the strategic planning session until the City
Manager is appointed. Chairman Dada said that it was the commission that had
provided the direction to include the City Manager in the strategic planning session
because he is the authority over the airport executive director.
Commissioner Burke said that he would like to politely suggest that the Commission
continue on with the agenda, and he thanked Chairman Dada and Vice Chairman
Corcoran for the clear direction for the Commission to wait for further information. Vice
Palm Springs Airport Commission
Action Summary Minutes of Regular Adjourned Meeting
July 20, 2022
______________________________________________________________________
Page 6 of 9
Chairman Corcoran asked the Commissioners to hold the September 27th date on
their calendars and that the matter would be resolved quickly.
Item 10.D was heard before Items 10.A, 10.B, and 10.C.
10.D Financial Summary Update
Airport Administration Manager Carpenter provided a highlight of the financial
summary for June 2022, and she noted there were fund surpluses in Funds 405, 410,
and 415. She also noted that there had been a change made to the reporting of the
financial summary to breakout the airline revenue from the non-airline revenue which
would make it easier for staff to project out the cost per enplaned passengers (CPE)
for the airline fees that the airport charges, and she said that the current cost is $6.11
per enplaned passenger which is lower than the predicted cost of $6.69.
Commissioner Miller asked how PSP’s cost relates to other comparable airports. Ms.
Carpenter said that she believed that PSP has a lower CPE.
Ms. Carpenter reported that staff was currently working on distributing the CRRSA
and ARPA concessions grant reimbursements for rent relief which applied to any
concessionaire that qualified for those grant programs, and that it was based on an
allocation. She said that staff had submitted the reimbursement plan to the FAA for
their approval.
Ms. Carpenter provided an overview of the Passenger Activity Report – Fiscal Year
Comparison, and she said that the passenger activity was 11% higher than staff had
projected for FY22. Ms. Carpenter noted that there were still some revenue and
expenses that were outstanding and that they would be posted as they were received.
Vice Chairman Corcoran referred to the surplus funds, and he asked how much of the
money were discretionary funds that the airport could invest in other things based on
the performance that the airport is experiencing at this time. Ms. Carpenter said that
approximately $250,000 could be moved into a landside fund, the airport could place
60 days of operations and maintenance funds into Fund 415 and those funds could
be used for operations and maintenance projects. Vice Chairman Corcoran asked
what the maximum amount of money that the airport could bring to the airlines based
on the performance of the airport at this time. Ms. Carpenter explained that based on
the current AULA, the airlines have to cover any deficits, and the surplus goes back
to the airlines as a credit, she said that she could not provide an amount at this time
because the airport was currently in negotiations for a new AULA with the airlines.
She said that it was staff’s plan to try to negotiate with the airlines to keep the $20
million surplus to use it for capital projects over the next five years. Commissioner
Payne inquired about the timeline for the negotiations. Ms. Carpenter said that staff
intended to have the negotiation settled by March 2023, and the AULA’s signed by
July 1, 2023.
Palm Springs Airport Commission
Action Summary Minutes of Regular Adjourned Meeting
July 20, 2022
______________________________________________________________________
Page 7 of 9
Commissioner Miller asked if the excess operating funds are to be placed into capital
project funds. Ms. Carpenter said that some of the excess operating funds would be
reallocated into the capital reserve funds. Commissioner Miller inquired about the
reallocation of the remaining funds, and he asked if the remaining funds could be
reallocated into non-capital improvement types of projects or purchases. Ms.
Carpenter said that the current AULA states that the remaining funds are to be credited
back to the airlines, and she reiterated that the airport staff was currently in
negotiations with the airlines to try to update the future AULA to allow the airport to
use the remaining funds towards projects for the next five years. Commissioner Miller
asked why the airport wouldn’t try to spend all the excess operating funds. Ms.
Carpenter explained that while staff does try to use the funds for projects, the large
amount of car rental revenue was unexpected.
Commissioner Miller suggested that the excess operations funds be discussed at the
next Budget and Finance Committee meeting, and Commissioner Feltman agreed.
Airport Executive Director Barrett stated that he would prefer to hold off on having the
Budget and Finance Committee discuss the excess operations funds while the airport
staff is actively in negotiations with the airlines because it could affect the progress
that staff has been making in converting the airlines residual agreement to a potential
hybrid compensatory agreement where the airport would go into a revenue sharing or
profit-sharing arrangement. Mr. Barrett explained that under the current AULA, the
airlines currently have significant control and say over the capital programs and that
staff was trying to change that dynamic. Commissioner Payne said that he believed
that Commissioner Miller was asking for clarity because there was confusion about
the handling of the car rental revenue. Mr. Barrett said that staff would provide as
much clarity as possible without going into too much detail because of the active
negotiations. Commissioner Feltman said that he felt that there would be plenty to
cover that is outside of the agreement negotiation in terms of surplus funds, and he
said that he believed that the CFC rate increase would again change the scale of the
rental car revenue. Mr. Barrett noted that the CFC funds are to be strictly used for
landside development and the rental car facilities, and he said that staff could provide
additional detail about how the funds are used, particularly the relevance of the funds
under the agreement and FAA rules.
Item 10.E was heard before Items 10.A, 10.B, and 10.C.
10.E Marketing Update
Deputy Director of Aviation Marketing and Air Service Meier said that the marketing
update had been provided in the agenda packet.
11. COMMISSIONERS REQUESTS AND REPORTS:
Commissioner Payne asked what the process would be to get the Airport Commission
meetings moved to a more reasonable time that doesn’t push into people’s personal
Palm Springs Airport Commission
Action Summary Minutes of Regular Adjourned Meeting
July 20, 2022
______________________________________________________________________
Page 8 of 9
lives. He said he would prefer for the meetings to be between 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.,
and to hold hybrid meetings. Chairman Dada explained that the City Council had made
the decision to have evening meetings to allow easier accessibility for public
comments. Commissioner Payne said that he got the sense that it seemed like having
the meetings between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. would not disrupt anything, and it would
be much more amenable to getting work done and having the appropriate level of
detail which cannot be afforded in the current meetings.
Commissioner Adams explained that the City Council wanted the commission
meetings to be in the evenings to allow for a mix of retirees and working residents to
be on the commissions. Commissioner Feltman noted that the Commission had asked
the City Council for an exemption which the City Council had denied, he said that he
didn’t believe that the City Council would take up the matter again and that he believed
that the matter was done. Chairman Dada noted that the decision for evening
meetings applied to all commissions. Commissioner Payne asked if that meant that
the meetings start at 5:30 p.m. and they run until the meeting has been completed.
Chairman Dada confirmed that Commissioner Payne’s understanding was correct and
that it was how the meetings have been conducted and that shortcuts have never
been taken. Commissioner Payne noted that Chairman Dada’s statement was true
until today. Chairman Dada said that he had only asked that the Commission try to
wrap of the meeting early.
Vice Chairman Corcoran suggested that the Commission take a step back to watch
what was currently happening, he said that within four months, there could be four
new Councilmembers and there will hopefully be a new City Manager. He said that it
could be possible that several of the things that came out of the existing City Council
and that primarily came out in response to the pandemic could be up for grabs. Vice
Chairman Corcoran asked the Commissioners to keep in mind that part of what City
Manager Clifton was trying to accomplish was to bring some sort of consistent process
to how Commissions work with the City Council and City staff, and he suggested that
the Commission pick their battles carefully.
Commissioner Payne asked how a consensus would be made on the agenda for the
strategic planning session. Vice Chairman Corcoran said that the airport staff would
be gathering the topics that the Commissioners propose, he and Chairman Dada
would be working with the staff to come up with an overall agenda that would have the
important information for the time that would be available, and he said that he would
socialize the agenda with the Commissioners to confirm that everyone agrees with the
direction of the agenda and how the meeting would be facilitated. Vice Chairman
Corcoran encouraged the Commissioner’s to submit their agenda topics.
12. REPORT OF CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS:
12.A Past City Council Actions
12.B Future City Council Actions
Palm Springs Airport Commission
Action Summary Minutes of Regular Adjourned Meeting
July 20, 2022
______________________________________________________________________
Page 9 of 9
13. RECEIVE AND FILE:
13.A Airline Activity Report June 2022
13.B Airline Activity Report Fiscal Year Comparison
13.C Airlines Schedules August 2022
14. COMMITTEES:
14.A Future Committee Meetings
15.ADJOURNMENT:
ACTION: Adjourn the meeting. Moved by Commissioner Weil, seconded by
Commissioner Adams and unanimously approved noting the absence of Vice
Chairman Corcoran and Commissioners Philbrook, Suero, and Wiseman.
The Airport Commission adjourned at 6:33 P.M. to a Regular Meeting on September 21,
2022, at 5:30 P.M. via videoconference.
_________________
Christina Brown
Executive Administrative Assistant
Summary of the Major Provisions and Requirements
of the Ralph M. Brown Act
The Ralph M. Brown Act is California's “sunshine” law for local government. It is found in the California Government
Code beginning at Section 54950. In a nutshell, it requires local government business to be conducted at open and public
meetings, except in certain limited situations. The Brown Act is based upon state policy that the people must be informed
so they can keep control over their government.
A. Application of the Brown Act to “Legislative Bodies”
The requirements of the Brown Act apply to “legislative bodies” of local governmental agencies. The term “legislative body”
is defined to include the governing body of a local agency (e.g., the city council) and any commission, committee, board or
other body of the local agency, whether permanent or temporary, decision-making or advisory, that is created by formal
action of a legislative body (Section 54952).
Standing committees of a legislative body, which consist solely of less than a quorum of the body, are subject to the
requirements of the Act. Some common examples include the finance, personnel, or similar policy subcommittees
of the city council or other city legislative body that have either some “continuing subject matter jurisdiction” or a
meeting schedule fixed by formal action of the legislative body. Standing committees exist to make routine and regular
recommendations on a specific subject matter, they survive resolution of any one issue or matter, and are a regular part of
the governmental structure.
The Brown Act does not apply to ad hoc committees consisting solely of less than a quorum of the legislative body,
provided they are composed solely of members of the legislative body and provided that these ad hoc committees do
not have some “continuing subject matter jurisdiction,” and do not have a meeting schedule fixed by formal action of a
legislative body. Thus, ad hoc committees would generally serve only a limited or single purpose, they are not perpetual
and they are dissolved when their specific task is completed.
Standing committees may, but are not required to, have regular meeting schedules. Even if such a committee does not have
a regular meeting schedule, its agendas should be posted at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting (Section 54954.2). If
this is done, the meeting is considered to be a regular meeting for all purposes. If not, the meeting must be treated as a
special meeting, and all of the limitations and requirements for special meetings apply.
The governing boards of private entities are subject to the Brown Act if either of the following applies: (i) the private entity
is created by an elected legislative body to exercise lawfully delegated authority of the public agency, or (ii) the private
entity receives funds from the local agency and the private entity's governing body includes a member of the legislative
body who was appointed by the legislative body (Section 54952).
The Brown Act also applies to persons who are elected to serve as members of a legislative body of a local agency who have
not yet assumed the duties of office (Section 54952.1). Under this provision, the Brown Act is applicable to newly elected,
but not-yet-sworn-in councilmembers.
B. Meetings
The central provision of the Brown Act requires that all “meetings” of a legislative body be open and public. The Brown Act
definition of the term “meeting” (Section 54952.2) is a very broad definition that encompasses almost every gathering of a
majority of Council members and includes:
“Any congregation of a majority of members of a legislative body at the same time and place to hear, discuss, or deliberate
upon any item that is within the subject matter jurisdiction of the legislative body or the local agency to which it pertains.”
In plain English, this means that a meeting is any gathering of a majority of members to hear or discuss any item of city
business or potential city business.
OFFICES ACROSS CALIFORNIA AND IN WASHINGTON, D.C. www.BBKlaw.com 1
ITEM 9.A
There are six specific types of gatherings that are not subject to the Brown Act. We refer to the exceptions as: (1) the
individual contact exception; (2) the seminar and conference exception; (3) the community meeting exception; (4) the other
legislative body exception; (5) the social or ceremonial occasion exception; and (6) the standing committee exception.
Unless a gathering of a majority of members falls within one of the exceptions discussed below, if a majority of members
are in the same room and merely listen to a discussion of city business, then they will be participating in a Brown Act
meeting that requires notice, an agenda, and a period for public comment.
1. The individual contact exception
Conversations, whether in person, by telephone or other means, between a member of a legislative body and any other
person do not constitute a meeting (Section 54952.2(c)(1)). However, such contacts may constitute a “serial meeting” in
violation of the Brown Act if the individual also makes a series of individual contacts with other members of the legislative
body serving as an intermediary among them. An explanation of what constitutes a “serial meeting” follows below.
2. The seminar and conference exception
The attendance by a majority of members at a seminar or conference or similar educational gathering is also generally
exempt from Brown Act requirements (Section 54952.2 (c)(2)). This exception, for example, would apply to attendance at a
California League of Cities seminar. However, in order to qualify under this exception, the seminar or conference must be
open to the public and be limited to issues of general interest to the public or to cities. Finally, this exception will not apply
to a conference or seminar if a majority of members discuss among themselves items of specific business relating to their
own city, except as part of the program.
3.. The community meeting exception
The community meeting exception allows members to attend neighborhood meetings, town hall forums, chamber of
commerce lunches or other community meetings sponsored by an organization other than the city at which issues of local
interest are discussed (Section 54952.2(c)(3)). However, members must observe several rules that limit this exception.
First, in order to fall within this exception, the community meeting must be “open and publicized.” Therefore, for example,
attendance by a majority of a body at a homeowners association meeting that is limited to the residents of a particular
development and only publicized among members of that development would not qualify for this exemption. Also, as with
the other exceptions, a majority of members cannot discuss among themselves items of city business, except as part of the
program.
4. The other legislative body exception
This exception allows a majority of members of any legislative body to attend meetings of other legislative bodies of the
city or of another jurisdiction (such as the county or another city) without treating such attendance as a meeting of the
body (Section 54952.2(c)(4)). Of course, as with other meeting exceptions, the members are prohibited from discussing city
business among themselves except as part of the scheduled meeting.
5. The social or ceremonial occasion exception
As has always been the case, Brown Act requirements do not apply to attendance by a majority of members at a purely
social or ceremonial occasion provided that a majority of members do not discuss among themselves matters of public
business (Section 54942.2(c)(5)).
6. The standing committee exception
This exception allows members of a legislative body, who are not members of a standing committee of that body, to attend
an open and noticed meeting of the standing committee without making the gathering a meeting of the full legislative
body itself. The exception is only applicable if the attendance of the members of the legislative body who are not standing
committee members would create a gathering of a majority of the legislative body; if not, then there is no "meeting." If
their attendance does establish a quorum of the parent legislative body, the members of the legislative body who are not
members of the standing committee may only attend as “observers” (Section 54952.2(c)(6)). This means that members of
the legislative body who are not members of the standing committee should not speak at the meeting, sit in their usual seat
on the dias or otherwise participate in the standing committee's meeting.
OFFICES ACROSS CALIFORNIA AND IN WASHINGTON, D.C. www.BBKlaw.com 2
With a very few exceptions, all meetings of a legislative body must occur within the boundaries of the local governmental
agency (Section 54954). Exceptions to this rule which allow the City Council to meet outside the City include meeting
outside the jurisdiction to comply with a court order or attend a judicial proceeding, to inspect real or personal property,
to attend a meeting with another legislative body in that other body's jurisdiction, to meet with a state or federal
representative to discuss issues affecting the local agency over which the other officials have jurisdiction, to meet in a
facility outside of, but owned by, the local agency, or to visit the office of the local agency's legal counsel for an authorized
closed session. These are meetings and in all other respects must comply with agenda and notice requirements.
“Teleconferencing” may be used as a method for conducting meetings whereby members of the body may be counted
towards a quorum and participate fully in the meeting from remote locations (Section 54953(b)). The following
requirements apply: the remote locations may be connected to the main meeting location by telephone, video or both; the
notice and agenda of the meeting must identify the remote locations; the remote locations must be posted and accessible
to the public; all votes must be by roll call; and the meeting must in all respects comply with the Act, including participation
by members of the public present in remote locations. A quorum of the legislative body must participate from locations
within the jurisdiction, but other members may participate from outside the jurisdiction. No person can compel the
legislative body to allow remote participation. The teleconferencing rules only apply to members of the legislative body;
they do not apply to staff members, attorneys or consultants who can participate remotely without following the posting
and public access requirements.
All actions taken by the legislative body in open session and the vote of each member thereon must be disclosed to the
public at the time the action is taken. (Section 54953(c)(2)).
C.Serial Meetings
In addition to regulating all gatherings of a majority of members of a legislative body, the Brown Act also addresses some
contacts between individual members of legislative bodies. On the one hand, the Brown Act specifically states that nothing
in the Act is intended to impose Brown Act requirements on individual contacts or conversations between a member of
a legislative body and any other person (Section 54952.2(c)(1)). However, the Brown Act also prohibits a series of such
individual contacts if they result in a “serial meeting” (Section 54952.2(b)).
Section 54952.2(b)(1) prohibits a majority of members of a legislative body outside of a lawful meeting from directly or
indirectly using a series of meetings to discuss, deliberate or take action on any item of business within the subject matter
jurisdiction of the body. Paragraph (b)(2) expressly provides that substantive briefings of members of a legislative body by
staff are permissible, as long as staff does not communicate the comments or positions of members to any other members.
A serial meeting is a series of meetings or communications between individuals in which ideas are exchanged among a
majority of a legislative body (i.e., three council members) through either one or more persons acting as intermediaries
or through use of a technological device (such as a telephone answering machine, or e-mail or voice mail), even though a
majority of members never gather in a room at the same time. Serial meetings commonly occur in one of two ways; either
a staff member, a member of the body, or some other person individually contacts a majority of members of a body and
shares ideas among the majority (“I’ve talked to Councilmembers A and B and they will vote ‘yes.’ Will you?”) or, without
the involvement of a third person, member A calls member B, who then calls member C, and so on, until a majority of the
body has reached a collective concurrence on a matter.
We recommend the following guidelines be followed to avoid inadvertent violation of the serial meeting rule. These rules
of conduct apply only when a majority of a legislative body is involved in a series of contacts or communications. The
types of contacts considered include contacts with local agency staff members, constituents, developers, lobbyists and
other members of the legislative body.
OFFICES ACROSS CALIFORNIA AND IN WASHINGTON, D.C. www.BBKlaw.com 3
1. Contacts with staff
Staff can inadvertently become a conduit among a majority of a legislative body in the course of providing briefings on
items of local agency business. To avoid an illegal serial meeting through a staff briefing:
a. Individual briefings of a majority of members of a legislative body should be “unidirectional,” in that information
should flow from staff to the member and the member's participation should be limited to asking questions and acquiring
information. Otherwise, multiple members could separately give staff direction thereby causing staff to shape or modify
its ultimate recommendations in order to reconcile the views of the various members, resulting in an action outside a
meeting.
b. Members should not ask staff to describe the views of other members of the body, and staff should not volunteer
those views if known.
c. Staff may present its viewpoint to the member, but should not ask for the member's views and the member
should avoid providing his or her views unless it is absolutely clear that the staff member is not discussing the matter with
a quorum of the legislative body.
2. Contacts with constituents, developers and lobbyists
As with staff, a constituent or lobbyist can also inadvertently become an intermediary who causes an illegal serial meeting.
Constituents' unfamiliarity with the requirements of the Act aggravate this potential problem because they may expect a
member of a legislative body to be willing to commit to a position in a private conversation in advance of a meeting. To
avoid serial meetings via constituent conversations:
a. First, state the ground rules “up front.” Ask if the constituent has or intends to talk with other members of the
body about the same subject; if so, make it clear that the constituent should not disclose the views of other members
during the conversation.
b. Explain to the constituent that you will not make a final decision on a matter prior to the meeting. For example:
“State law prevents me from giving you a commitment outside a meeting. I will listen to what you have to say and give it
consideration as I make up my mind.”
c. Do more listening and asking questions than expressing opinions.
d. If you disclose your thoughts about a matter, counsel the constituent not to share them with other members of
the legislative body.
3. Contacts with fellow members of the same legislative body
Direct contacts concerning local agency business with fellow members of the same legislative body, whether through
face-to-face or telephonic conversations, notes or letters, electronic mail or staff members, are the most obvious means
by which an illegal serial meeting can occur. This is not to say that a member of a legislative body is precluded from
discussing items of agency business with another member of the body outside of a meeting; as long as the communication
does not involve a quorum of the body, no “meeting” has occurred. There is, however, always the risk that one participant
in the communication will disclose the views of the other participant to a third or fourth member, creating an illegal
serial meeting. Therefore, we recommend you avoid discussing local agency business with a quorum of the body or
communicating the views of other members outside a meeting.
These suggested rules of conduct may seem unduly restrictive and impractical, and may make acquisition of important
information more difficult or time-consuming. Nevertheless, following them will help assure that your conduct comports
with the Brown Act's goal of achieving open government. If you have questions about compliance with the Act in any given
situation, please ask for advice.
OFFICES ACROSS CALIFORNIA AND IN WASHINGTON, D.C. www.BBKlaw.com 4
D. Notice and Agenda Requirements
Two key provisions of the Brown Act that ensure that the public's business is conducted openly are the requirements that
legislative bodies post agendas prior to their meetings (Sections 54954.2, 54955 and 54956) and that no action or discussion
may occur on items or subjects not listed on the posted agenda (Section 54954.2(a)(2)). Limited exceptions to the rule
against discussing or taking action on an item not on a posted agenda are discussed below.
Legislative bodies, except advisory committees and standing committees, are required to establish a time and place for
holding regular meetings (Section 54954(a)). Meeting agendas must contain a brief general description of each item of
business to be transacted or discussed at the meeting (Section 54954.2(a)). The description need not exceed 20 words.
Each agenda must be posted in a place that is freely accessible to the public and must be posted on the agency’s website,
if it has one. After January 1, 2019, additional online posting requirements apply. Agenda posting requirements differ
depending on the type of meeting to be conducted.
If the meeting is a “regular meeting” of the legislative body (i.e., occurs on the body’s regular meeting day, without a special
meeting call), the agenda must be posted 72 hours in advance of the meeting (Section 54954.2(a)). For “special meetings,”
the “call” of the meeting and the agenda (which are typically one and the same) must be posted at least 24 hours prior to
the meeting (Section 54956). Each member of the legislative body must personally receive written notice of the special
meeting either by personal delivery or by “any other means” (such as fax, electronic mail or U.S. mail) at least 24 hours
before the time of the special meeting, unless they have previously waived receipt of written notice. Members of the
press (including radio and television stations) and other members of the public can also request written notice of special
meetings and if they have, that notice must be given at the same time notice is provided to members of the legislative
body. A special meeting may not be held to discuss salaries, salary schedules or compensation paid in the form of fringe
benefits of a local agency “executive” as defined in Government Code section 3511(d). However, the budget may be
discussed in a special meeting. Section 54956(b).
Both regular and special meetings may be adjourned to another time. Notices of adjourned meetings must be posted on
the door of the meeting chambers where the meeting occurred within 24 hours after the meeting is adjourned (Section
54955). If the adjourned meeting occurs more than five days after the prior meeting, a new agenda for that adjourned
meeting must be posted 72 hours in advance of the adjourned meeting (Section 54954.2(b)(3)).
The Brown Act requires the local agency to mail the agenda or the full agenda packet to any person making a written
request no later than the time the agenda is posted or is delivered to the members of the body, whichever is earlier. The
agency may charge a fee to recover its costs of copying and mailing. Any person may make a standing request to receive
these materials, in which event the request must be renewed annually. Failure by any requestor to receive the agenda does
not constitute grounds to invalidate any action taken at a meeting (Section 54954.1).
If materials pertaining to a meeting are distributed less than 72 hours before the meeting, they must be made available to
the public as soon as they are distributed to the members of the legislative body. Further, the agenda for every meeting of
a legislative body must state where a person may obtain copies of materials pertaining to an agenda item delivered to the
legislative body within 72 hours of the meeting. (Section 54957.5).
A legislative body that has convened a meeting and whose membership is a quorum of another legislative body (for
example, a city council that also serves as the governing board of a housing authority) may convene a meeting of that
other legislative body, concurrently or in serial order, only after an oral announcement of the amount of compensation or
stipend, if any, that each member will receive as a result of convening the second body. No announcement need be made if
the compensation is set by statute or if no additional compensation is paid to the members. (Section 54952.3(a)).
OFFICES ACROSS CALIFORNIA AND IN WASHINGTON, D.C. www.BBKlaw.com 5
E. Public Participation
1. Regular Meetings
The Brown Act mandates that agendas for regular meetings allow for two types of public comment periods. The first is a
general audience comment period, which is the part of the meeting where the public can comment on any item of interest
that is within the subject matter jurisdiction of the local agency. This general audience comment period may come at any
time during a meeting (Section 54954.3).
The second type of public comment period is the specific comment period pertaining to items on the agenda. The Brown
Act requires the legislative body to allow these specific comment periods on agenda items to occur prior to or during the
City Council's consideration of that item (Section 54954.3).
Some public entities accomplish both requirements by placing a general audience comment period at the beginning of the
agenda where the public can comment on agenda and non-agenda items. Other public entities provide public comment
periods as each item or group of items comes up on the agenda, and then leave the general public comment period to the
end of the agenda. Either method is permissible, though public comment on public hearing items must be taken during the
hearing. Caution should also be taken with consent calendars. The body should have a public comment period for consent
calendar items before the body acts on the consent calendar, unless it permits members of the audience to “pull” items
from the calendar.
The Brown Act allows a body to preclude public comments on an agenda item in one situation, where the item was
considered by a committee of the body which held a meeting where public comments on that item were allowed. So, if
the body has standing committees (which are required to have agendized and open meetings with an opportunity for the
public to comment on items on that committee's agenda) and the committee has previously considered an item, then at
the time the item comes before the full body, the body may choose not to take additional public comments on that item.
However, if the version presented to the body is different from the version presented to, and considered by, the committee,
the public must be given another opportunity to speak on that item at the meeting of the full body (Section 54954.3).
2. Public Comments at Special Meetings
The Brown Act requires that agendas for special meetings provide an opportunity for members of the public to
address the body concerning any item listed on the agenda prior to the body's consideration of that item (Section 54954.3).
Unlike regular meetings, in a special meeting the body does not have to allow public comment on any non-agenda matter.
3. Limitations on the Length and Content of the Public's Comments
A legislative body may adopt reasonable regulations limiting the total amount of time allocated to each person for public
testimony. For example, typical time limits restrict speakers to three or five minutes. A legislative body may also adopt
reasonable regulations limiting the total amount of time allocated for public testimony on legislative matters, such as
a zoning ordinance or other regulatory ordinance (Section 54954.3(b)). However, we do not recommend setting total
time limits per item for any quasi-judicial matter such as a land use application or business license or permit application
hearing. Application of a total time limit to a quasi-judicial matter could result in a violation of the due process rights of
those who were not able to speak to the body during the time allotted.
The Act precludes the body from prohibiting public criticism of the policies, procedures, programs, or services of the
agency or the acts or omissions of the city council (Section 54954.3 (c)). This does not mean that a member of the public
may say anything. If the topic of the public's comments is not within the subject matter jurisdiction of the agency, the
member of the public can be cut off.
The body also may adopt reasonable rules of decorum for its meetings which preclude a speaker from disrupting,
disturbing or otherwise impeding the orderly conduct of public meetings. Also, the right to publicly criticize a public
official does not include the right to slander that official, though the line between criticism and slander is often difficult to
determine in the heat of the moment. Care must be given to avoid violating the speech rights of speakers by suppressing
opinions relevant to the business of the body.
OFFICES ACROSS CALIFORNIA AND IN WASHINGTON, D.C. www.BBKlaw.com 6
The use of profanity may be a basis for stopping a speaker. However, it will depend upon what profane words or comments
are made and the context of those comments in determining whether it rises to the level of impeding the orderly conduct
of a meeting. While terms such as “damn” and “hell” may have been disrupting words thirty years ago, today's standards
seem to accept a stronger range of foul language. Therefore, if the chair is going to rule someone out of order for
profanity, the chair should make sure the language is truly objectionable and that it causes a disturbance or disruption in
the proceeding before the chair cuts off the speaker.
4. Discussion of Non-Agenda Items
A body may not take action or discuss any item that does not appear on the posted agenda (Section 54954.2).
There are two exceptions to this rule. The first is if the body determines by majority vote that an emergency situation
exists. The term “emergency” is limited to work stoppages or crippling disasters (Section 54956.5). The second exception
is if the body finds by a two-thirds vote of those present, or if less than two-thirds of the body is present, by unanimous
vote, that there is a need to take immediate action on an item and the need for action came to the attention of the local
agency subsequent to the posting of the agenda (Section 54954.2 (b)). This means that if four members of a five-member
body are present, three votes are required to add the item; if only three are present, a unanimous vote is required.
In addition to these exceptions, there are several limited exceptions to the no discussion on non-agenda items rule. Those
exceptions are:
• Members of the legislative body or staff may briefly respond to statements made or questions posed by persons during
public comment periods;
• Members or staff may ask questions for clarification and provide a reference to staff or other resources for factual
information;
• Members or staff may make a brief announcement, ask a question or make a brief report on his or her own activities;
• Members may, subject to the procedural rules of the legislative body, request staff to report back to the legislative body
at a subsequent meeting concerning any matter; and
• The legislative body may itself as a body, subject to the rules of procedures of the legislative body, take action to direct
staff to place a matter of business on a future agenda.
The body may not discuss non-agenda items to any significant degree under these exceptions. The comments must be
brief. These exceptions do not allow long or wide-ranging question and answer sessions between the public and city
council or between legislative body and staff.
When the body is considering whether to direct staff to add an item to a subsequent agenda, these exceptions do not allow
the body to discuss the merits of the matter or to engage in a debate about the underlying issue.
To protect the body from problems in this area, legislative bodies may wish to adopt a rule that any one member may
request an item to be placed on a subsequent agenda, so that discussion of the merits of the issue can be easily avoided. If
the legislative body does not wish to adopt this rule, then the body's consideration and vote on the matter must take place
with virtually no discussion.
It is important to follow these exceptions carefully and interpret them narrowly because the city would not want to have an
important and complex action tainted by a non-agendized discussion of the item.
5. The public's right to photograph, videotape, tape-record and broadcast open meetings
The public has the right to videotape or broadcast a public meeting or to make a motion picture or still camera record of
such meeting (Section 54953.5). However, a body may prohibit or limit recording of a meeting if the body finds that the
recording cannot continue without noise, illumination, or obstruction of a view that constitutes, or would constitute, a
disruption of the proceedings (Section 54953.5). These grounds would appear to preclude a finding based on nonphysical
grounds such as breach of decorum or mental disturbance.
Any audio or video tape record of an open and public meeting that is made, for whatever purpose, by or at the direction of
the city is a public record and is subject to inspection by the public consistent with the requirements of the Public Records
Act. The city must not destroy the tape or film record of the open and public meeting for at least 30 days following the
date of the taping or recording. Inspection of the audiotape or videotape must be made available to the public for free on
equipment provided by the city (Section 54953.5).
OFFICES ACROSS CALIFORNIA AND IN WASHINGTON, D.C. www.BBKlaw.com 7
Any audio or video tape record of an open and public meeting that is made, for whatever purpose, by or at the direction of
the city is a public record and is subject to inspection by the public consistent with the requirements of the Public Records
Act. The city must not destroy the tape or film record of the open and public meeting for at least 30 days following the
date of the taping or recording. Inspection of the audiotape or videotape must be made available to the public for free on
equipment provided by the city (Section 54953.5).
If a member of the public requests a duplicate of the audio or videotape, the city must provide such copy. If the city has an
audiotape or videotape duplication machine, the city must provide the copy on its own machine. If the city does not have
such a machine, the city must send it out to a business that can make a copy. The city may charge a fee to cover the cost of
duplication.
The Brown Act requires written material distributed to a majority of the body by any person to be provided to the public
without delay. If the material is distributed during the meeting and prepared by the local agency, it must be available
for public inspection at the meeting. If it is distributed during the meeting by a member of the public, it must be made
available for public inspection after the meeting (Section 54957.5).
One problem in applying this rule arises when written materials are distributed directly to a majority of the body without
knowledge of City staff, or even without the members knowing that a majority has received it. The law still requires these
materials to be treated as public records. Thus, it is a good idea for at least one member of the body to ensure that staff
gets a copy of the document so that copies can be made for the city’s records and for members of the public who request a
copy.
F. Closed Sessions
The Brown Act allows a legislative body during a meeting to convene a closed session in order to meet privately with its
advisors on specifically enumerated topics. Sometimes people refer to closed sessions as “executive sessions,” a holdover
term from the Brown Act's early days. Examples of business which may be conducted in closed session include personnel
evaluations or labor negotiations, pending litigation, and real estate negotiations (See Sections 54956.7 through 54957 and
Sections 54957.6 and 54957.8). Political sensitivity of an item is not a lawful reason for a closed session discussion.
The Brown Act requires that closed session business be described on the public agenda. And, there is a “bonus” of sorts for
using prescribed language to describe litigation closed sessions in that legal challenges to the adequacy of the description
are precluded (Section 54954.5). This so-called “safe harbor” encourages cities to use a very similar agenda format. The
legislative body must identify the City's negotiator in open session before going into closed session to discuss either real
estate negotiations or labor negotiations.
The legislative body must reconvene the public meeting after a closed session and publicly report specified closed session
actions and the vote taken on those actions (Section 54957.1). There are limited exceptions for certain kinds of litigation
decisions, and to protect the victims of sexual misconduct or child abuse.
Contracts, settlement agreements or other documents that are finally approved or adopted in closed session must be
provided at the time the closed session ends to any person who has made a standing request for all documentation in
connection with a request for notice of meetings (typically members of the media) and to any person who makes a request
within 24 hours of the posting of the agenda, if the requestor is present when the closed session ends (Section 54957.1).
The Brown Act also includes detailed requirements describing when litigation is considered “pending” for the purposes of a
closed session (Section 54956.9). These requirements involve detailed factual determinations that will probably be made in
the first instance by the City Attorney.
Roberts v. City of Palmdale, 5 Cal.4th 363 (1993), a California Supreme case, affirms the confidentiality of attorney-client
memoranda. See also Section 54956.9(b)(3)(F) with respect to privileged communications regarding pending litigation.
Closed sessions may be started in a location different from the usual meeting place as long as the location is noted on the
agenda and the public can be present when the meeting first begins. Moreover, public comment on closed session items
must be allowed before convening the closed session.
OFFICES ACROSS CALIFORNIA AND IN WASHINGTON, D.C. www.BBKlaw.com 8
One perennial area of confusion is whether a body may discuss salary and benefits of an individual employee (such as a city
manager) as part of an evaluation session under Section 54957. It may not. However, the body may designate a negotiator
to negotiate with that employee and meet with its negotiator in closed session under Section 54957.6 to provide directions.
The employee in question may not be present in such a closed session.
G. Enforcement
There are both civil remedies and criminal misdemeanor penalties for Brown Act violations. The civil remedies include
injunctions against further violations, orders nullifying any unlawful action, and orders determining the validity of any rule
to penalize or discourage the expression of a member of the legislative body (Section 54960.1). The provision relating to
efforts to penalize expression may come up in the context of measures by the legislative body to censure or penalize one
of its members for breaching confidentiality or other violations. This area of law is charged with difficult free speech and
attorney-client privilege issues. The tape recording of closed sessions is not required unless the court orders such taping
after finding a closed session violation (Section 54960).
Prior to filing suit to invalidate an action taken in violation of the Brown Act, the complaining party must make a written
demand on the legislative body to cure or correct the alleged violation. The written demand must be made within 90
days after the challenged action was taken in open session unless the violation involves the agenda requirements under
Section 54954.2, in which case the written demand must be made within 30 days. The legislative body is required to cure
or correct the challenged action and inform the party who filed the demand of its correcting actions, or its decision not
to cure or correct, within 30 days. A suit must be filed by the complaining party within 15 days after receipt of the written
notice from the legislative body, or if there is no written response, within 15 days after the 30-day cure period expires.
Any person may also seek declaratory and injunctive relief to find a past practice of a legislative body to constitute a
violation of the Brown Act (Section 54960). In order to do so, the person must first send a “cease and desist” letter to the
local agency, requesting that the practice cease. If the agency replies within a designated time, and disavows the practice,
no lawsuit may be initiated. However, if the agency fails to reply or declares its intent to continue the practice, the lawsuit
seeking to declare the practice a violation of the Brown Act may be filed, and attorney fees will be granted in the event the
practice is found to violate the Act.
A member of a legislative body will not be criminally liable for a violation of the Brown Act unless the member intends to
deprive the public of information to which the member knows or has reason to know the public is entitled under the Brown
Act (Section 54959). This standard became effective in 1994 and is a different standard from most criminal standards. Until
it is applied and interpreted by a court, it is not clear what type of evidence will be necessary to prosecute a Brown Act
violation.
Under Section 54963, it is a violation of the Brown Act for any person to disclose confidential information acquired
in a closed session. This section enumerates several nonexclusive remedies available to punish persons making such
disclosures and to prevent future disclosures.
H. Conclusion
The Brown Act contains many rules and some ambiguities; it can be confusing and compliance can be difficult. In the event
that you have any questions regarding any provision of the law, you should contact your City Attorney.
Please contact either of today's presenters if you would like more details on these issues and how your agency can address
them:
OFFICES ACROSS CALIFORNIA AND IN WASHINGTON, D.C. www.BBKlaw.com 9
Lauren Langer
(310) 643-8448
Lauren.Langer@bbklaw.com
Trevor Rusin
(310) 643-8448
Trevor.Rusin@bbklaw.com
MUNICIPAL CODE 2.04 COUNCIL
2.04.060 Commission appointments. (qcode.us)
• The members of each city board or commission shall be appointed by motion of the city
council, adopted by at least three affirmative votes.
• Each member shall either: reside, work or go to school within the City of Palm Springs. For
purposes of this requirement, “work” may consist of employment at a physical location within
the City or an ownership interest of least twenty percent (20%) of a business that is physically
located within the City. In the event the City Council determines that it is necessary or
convenient to appoint a board/commission member possessing unique knowledge, skill or
experience, the City Council may, in its sole discretion, appoint one or more board/commission
member(s), notwithstanding the fact that such candidate(s) do(es) not live, work or go to
school within the City of Palm Springs.
• No member of a city board or commission shall hold any paid office or employment in the city
government.
• They shall serve at the pleasure of the city council and shall be subject to removal by motion
of the city council, adopted by at least three affirmative votes.
MUNICIPAL CODE 2.06 BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
- GENERAL PROVISIONS
Chapter 2.06 BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS—GENERAL PROVISIONS
(qcode.us)
2.06.010 General rules regarding appointments, terms, vacancies. (qcode.us)
• Unless otherwise provided by law, or by ordinance adopted after the effective date of the
ordinance codified in this section, all members of boards and commissions of the city shall be
appointed for three-year terms commencing on July 1st of the year of appointment; provided,
that interim vacancies shall be filled by appointment for the unexpired term of the member
replaced.
• Persons appointed to a board or commission may be reappointed for up to one additional full
term, not to exceed a total of seven years of service on such board or commission; such
reappointments shall not be construed as automatic, and applicants must go through the same
process for reappointment as all other applicants who are seeking initial appointment.
• Except in cases where the mayor or the city council are not the appointing authority, no person
appointed to a board or commission shall become eligible for appointment to such board or
commission for a period of one year from the expiration of his or her service upon such board
or commission; provided, however, that person, if otherwise qualified, shall become
immediately eligible for appointment to any other board or commission without the one-year
hiatus. After the expiration of one year during which the person has not served upon the same
board or commission, that person, if otherwise qualified, shall again become eligible for
appointment to the board or commission upon which he or she formerly served, subject to the
provisions of subsection (c) of this section.
• All existing members of any board or commission shall be eligible upon the expiration of their
existing term for one additional three-year term, unless they have also served an additional
interim term, in which case they shall not be eligible for an additional term if their total
continuous service would then be more than seven years, counting the additional three-year
term to which they would be reappointed.
2.06.020 Chairmen, vice-chairmen—Selection—Terms. (qcode.us)
• Unless otherwise provided by law, or by ordinance or resolution adopted after the effective
date hereof, each board and commission of the city shall annually at its first meeting held after
June 30, choose one of its number as chairman and one as vice-chairman. Each chairman
and vice-chairman shall have authority and perform such duties as are commonly associated
with their respective titles, or as may be specially prescribed by law or by the bylaws or other
rules of the board or commission. Vacancies in either such position occurring prior to July 1
may be filled as in the first instance, and a new chairman or vice-chairman may be chosen at
any time by majority vote of all members of the board or commission.
2.06.050 Meetings. (qcode.us)
• Each Board and Commission shall set its regular meetings to occur at 5:30 p.m., unless
otherwise exempted by the City Council. Boards and Commissions may conduct adjourned
regular, special, adjourned special, and emergency meetings at such times as circumstances
may require, subject to approval by the City Manager.
MUNICIPAL CODE 2.16 PALM SPRINGS
INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT COMMISSION
2.16.020 Membership—Creation. (qcode.us)
• There is created in the city an international airport commission, which shall consist of nineteen
members. The nineteen members shall be appointed in the following manner: ten members,
appointed in accordance with Section 2.04.060 of the Palm Springs Municipal Code; nine
members, each appointed by the Palm Springs City Council from candidates nominated by
each of the city councils of Cathedral City, Coachella, Desert Hot Springs, Indian Wells, Indio,
La Quinta, Palm Desert, and Rancho Mirage, and the board of supervisors of Riverside
County.
• No member of the international airport commission shall serve as a member of the airport land
use commission for Riverside County or any airport board or commission for another airport
within Riverside, Imperial, San Diego, or San Bernardino counties while serving as a member
of the international airport commission, created pursuant to the provisions of this section. No
person shall be eligible to serve or continue to serve as a member of the international airport
commission who has served as a member of the airport land use commission for Riverside
County or any airport board or commission for another airport within Riverside, Imperial, San
Diego, or San Bernardino counties within the twelve-month period immediately preceding
service as a member of the international airport commission.
2.16.030 Membership—Terms. (qcode.us)
• The term of office for regular members shall be as provided in Section 2.06.010 of the Palm
Springs Municipal Code for all appointees.
2.16.040 Officers—Committees. (qcode.us)
• Designation of the chairperson and vice-chairperson for the commission shall be governed by
Section 2.06.020 of this code, except that from the effective date of the ordinance codified in
this chapter through June 30, 1995, the chair and vice-chair shall remain as in effect at the
time of adoption of the ordinance codified in this chapter. The chairperson shall be a member
from the city of Palm Springs. The chairperson shall have the authority to appoint and
affix the membership of such number of standing and temporary committees as he or
she may find expedient for the performance of its duties.
2.16.042 Standing noise subcommittee. (qcode.us)
• The commission shall have a standing noise committee consisting of five members. The five
members shall consist of five existing commissioners of which at least two shall be from the
city of Palm Springs and one shall be from Cathedral City. The chairperson for the commission
shall appoint the members, giving preference to commissioners living in Compatibility Zones
A through E as identified on the Airport Compatibility Plan of the City of Palm Springs General
Plan. The committee shall meet at least quarterly and more often as deemed necessary, at a
place and time determined by resolution of the committee, to discuss and consider airport
noise issues. All meetings of the committee shall be conducted pursuant to the Brown Act.
2.16.050 Meetings—Rules of procedures. (qcode.us)
• The commission shall set its regular meetings by resolution or motion of the commission and
shall hold adjourned regular meetings and special meetings at such times as circumstances
shall require. A majority of the existing appointed active members of the commission shall
constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. The chairperson shall be consulted on the
preparation of the meeting agenda. The commission may establish such rules and regulations
as it deems necessary for the conduct of its business. The director of aviation or his or her
designee, shall attend all meetings of the airport commission, furnish necessary material, data,
maps, and records, submit proposals and recommendations and provide technical assistance
and advice, as required.
2.16.060 Powers—Duties. (qcode.us)
• The international airport commission shall be advisory to the Palm Springs city council and
shall have the duty and power to advise the city council on the following matters:
(1) Study and consider long-range plans for ultimate development of Palm Springs
international airport, including property acquisition and use, giving due regard to any
master plan adopted by the city, and to federal and state regulations;
(2) Develop valley-wide strategy for implementation of full customs facilities at the airport;
(3) Keep abreast of major operational programs at the airport;
(4) Study and recommend on matters relating to airport improvements, including methods
of financing and leasing arrangements;
(5) Review and recommend on special permits and proposals that deviate from the airport’s
master plan;
(6) Keep abreast of developments in the aviation industry; study and recommend types of
services to be offered at the airport;
(7) Keep respective elected bodies informed of activities at the airport and recommend to
those same bodies valley-wide initiatives to assist the airport;
(8) Review, annually, a summary budget of the operation of the airport;
(9) Review and assist in the development of airport marketing programs with particular
emphasis in the area of air service development;
(10) Review and assist in the development of airport promotional/advertising programs with
particular emphasis on getting service area citizenry to fly from Palm Springs;
(11) Provide leadership as representatives of various Coachella Valley cities in the
development and maintenance of an airport support group;
(12) Provide coordination with agencies or committees dealing with airport issues;
(13) Review and recommend on the mix of ground transportation access to the airport;
(14) Participate in valley-wide lobbying efforts, state and federal, to assist the airport; and
(15) Perform other advisory duties as directed by the city council with all reports first
submitted through the office of the city manager.
CITY OF PALM SPRINGS
Financial Summary
Ending August 31, 2022
Fund 405 - Customer
Facility Charges
FY 22-23
Budget
FY 22-23
Actual
FY 22-23
% Of Budget
FY 21-22
Actual
FY 20-22 vs
FY 21-23
% Change
FY 20-21
Actual
FY 20-21 vs
FY 21-23
% Change
Operating Revenue 7,465,000 264,024 4%178,086 48%19,540 1251%
Operating Expenditures 2,000,000 - 0%- 0%- 0%
Net Balance 5,465,000 264,024 5%178,086 48%19,540 1251%
-
1,000,000
2,000,000
3,000,000
4,000,000
5,000,000
6,000,000
1
5,465,000
264,024 178,086 19,540
Fund 405 -Customer Facility Charges -Net Balance
FY 22-23
Budget
FY 22-23
Actual
FY 21-22
Actual
FY 20-21
Actual
Prepared 9/15/2022
ITEM 10.B
Page 1 of 8
CITY OF PALM SPRINGS
Financial Summary
Ending August 31, 2022
Fund 410 - Passenger
Facility Charges
FY 22-23
Budget
FY 22-23
Actual
FY 22-23
% Of Budget
FY 21-22
Actual
FY 20-22 vs
FY 21-23
% Change
FY 20-21
Actual
FY 20-21 vs
FY 21-23
% Change
Operating Revenue 6,867,000 331,622 5%56,522 487%2,269 14515%
Operating Expenditures 2,521,000 - 0%- -
Net Balance 4,346,000 331,622 8%56,522 487%2,269 14515%
-
500,000
1,000,000
1,500,000
2,000,000
2,500,000
3,000,000
3,500,000
4,000,000
4,500,000
Fiscal Year
4,346,000
331,622
56,522 2,269
Fund 410 -Passenger Facility Charges -Net Balance
FY 22-23
Budget
FY 22-23
Actual
FY 21-22
Actual
FY 20-21
Actual
Prepared 9/15/2022Page 2 of 8
CITY OF PALM SPRINGS
Financial Summary
Ending August 31, 2022
Fund 415 - Airport
Operations &
Maintenance
FY 22-23
Budget
FY 22-23
Actual
FY 22-23
% Of Budget
FY 21-22
Actual
FY 20-22 vs FY
21-23
% Change
FY 20-21
Actual
FY 20-21 vs FY
21-23
% Change
Operating Revenue 41,069,398 3,455,956 8%3,022,347 14%1,798,921 92%
Operating Expenditures 33,880,956 2,467,190 7%2,027,366 22%2,279,775 8%
Net Balance 7,188,442 988,767 14%994,981 -1%(480,854) -306%
CARES GRANT USED $5,078,179 *
3,455,956
3,022,347
1,798,921
14%
68%
0
500,000
1,000,000
1,500,000
2,000,000
2,500,000
3,000,000
3,500,000
4,000,000
FY 22-23 FY 21-22 FY 20-21
YTD Actual Revenue
2,467,190
2,027,366
2,279,775
22%-11%
-
500,000
1,000,000
1,500,000
2,000,000
2,500,000
3,000,000
FY 22-23 FY 21-22 FY 20-21
YTD Actual Expenditures
Prepared 9/15/2022Page 3 of 8
CITY OF PALM SPRINGS
Financial Summary
Ending August 31, 2022
Fund 415 - Airport
Operations &
Maintenance
FY 22-23
Budget
FY 22-23
Actual
FY 22-23
% Of Budget
FY 21-22
Actual
FY 20-22 vs FY
21-23
% Change
FY 20-21
Actual
FY 20-21 vs FY
21-23
% Change
Operating Revenue
Airline Revenue
Scheduled Landing Fees 3,340,000 164,005 5%295,376 -44%65,059 152%
Landing Fee Surcharge 1,783,000 94,022 5%183,684 -49%26,103 260%
Terminal Airline Space 2,094,000 331,003 16%314,204 5%355,673 -7%
Terminal Usage Hold Room 1,034,000 74,626 7%130,076 -43%42,610 75%
Total Airline Revenues 8,251,000 663,655 8%923,339 15%489,445 89%
Non-Airline Revenue
*CARES Act 5,989,698 - 0%- -
CRRSAA-Airport 1,100,000 - 0%- -
CRRSAA-Concessions 4,800,000 - 0%- -
Airfield Concessions 310,000 14,402 5%32,645 11%1,435 904%
Property Rental - Non Aviation 450,000 36,375 8%65,651 13%65,126 -44%
Land Rental 1,223,000 203,689 17%186,285 12%186,453 9%
Leased Parking 4,704,000 821,137 17%768,059 23%218,956 275%
Ariport Use Permits 75,000 1,384 2%5,644 5%2,284 -39%
Terminal Non-Airline Rental 1,741,300 289,001 17%112,033 11%114,943 151%
Advertising 400,000 29,292 7%44,463 17%18,647 57%
On Airport Rental Car 8,899,000 1,218,928 14%967,516 17%328,173 271%
Commerical Airport Fee 853,000 81,440 10%90,036 12%65,426 24%
Taxi Access Fees 667,000 47,616 7%61,269 10%2,212 2053%
Customs 349,000 4,487 1%9,306 4%4,351 3%
All Other Revenue 1,257,400 44,551 4%(243,900) -15%301,470 -85%
Total Non-Airline Revenue 32,818,398 2,792,301 9%2,099,008 13%1,309,476 60%
Total Operating Revenues 41,069,398 3,455,956 8%3,022,347 1,798,921
*CARES Act - Expire 5/10/2024 -
Total Budget
*CARES Act
0%
CRRSAA-Airport
0%
CRRSAA-Concessions
0%Airfield Concessions
1%
Property Rental -Non Aviation
1%
Land Rental
7%
Leased Parking
29%
Ariport Use Permits
0%
Terminal Non-Airline Rental
10%Advertising
1%
On Airport Rental Car
44%
Commerical Airport Fee
3%
Taxi Access Fees
2%
Customs
0%
All Other Revenue
2%
AIRPORT OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE REVENUE
Prepared 9/15/2022Page 4 of 8
CITY OF PALM SPRINGS
Financial Summary
Ending August 31, 2022
Fund 415 - Airport
Operations &
Maintenance
FY 22-23
Budget
FY 22-23
Actual
FY 22-23
% Of Budget
FY 21-22
Actual
FY 20-22 vs FY
21-23
% Change
FY 20-21
Actual
FY 20-21 vs FY
21-23
% Change
Operating Expenditures
Airport Administration 6,296,049 233,557 4%178,934 3%260,481 -10%
Airport Security 3,138,357 477,232 15%337,090 11%335,543 42%
Airside Operations 1,054,902 3,161 0%4,425 0%17,057 -81%
Airport Rescue - Fire 4,237,176 420,501 10%417,168 12%468,421 -10%
Landside Operations 1,516,675 66,838 4%55,389 4%89,003 -25%
Grounds Maintenance 662,081 24,132 4%243 0%8 N/A
Terminal Building Operations 7,032,956 726,863 10%620,578 9%634,831 14%
Control Center Operations 4,285,199 468,078 11%412,467 10%420,230 11%
U.S. Customs 276,484 46,827 17%1,071 1%54,202 -14%
PERS Cost Recovery - - 0%- 0%-
Budget Transfer Out 5,381,078 - 0%
Total Operating Expenditures 33,880,957 2,467,190 7%2,027,366 7%2,279,776 -11%
Operating Revenues in Excess of
Operating Expenditures 7,188,441 988,767 994,981 (480,855)
Airport Administration
10%
Airport Security
19%
Airside Operations
0%
Airport Rescue -Fire
17%
Landside Operations
3%Grounds Maintenance
1%
Terminal Building Operations
29%
Control Center Operations
19%
U.S. Customs
2%
PERS Cost Recovery
0%
AIRPORT OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE EXPENDITURE
Prepared 9/15/2022Page 5 of 8
CITY OF PALM SPRINGS
Financial Summary
Ending August 31, 2022
Fund 416 - Airport
Capital Projects
FY 22-23
Budget
FY 22-23
Actual
FY 22-23
% Of Budget
FY 21-22
Actual
FY 21-22 vs
FY 21-23
% Change
FY 20-21
Actual
FY 20-21 vs
FY 21-23
% Change
Operating Revenue 12,038,000 - 0%3,039,772 57%2,712,880 12%
Operating Expenditures 12,038,000 - 0%- 0%-
Net Balance - - 3,039,772 2,712,880 12%
-
500,000
1,000,000
1,500,000
2,000,000
2,500,000
3,000,000
3,500,000 3,039,772
2,712,880
Fund 416 -Airport Capital Projects -Net Balance
FY 22-23
Actual
FY 21-22
Actual
FY 20-21
Actual
Prepared 9/15/2022Page 6 of 8
CITY OF PALM SPRINGS
Financial Summary
Ending August 31, 2022
CASH SUMMARY FY 22-23
Acutal
FY 21-22
Actual
FY 20-21
Actual
Fund 405 29,981,860 25,506,924 24,038,243
Fund 410 1,819,434 2,075,722 1,834,038
Fund 415 Unrestricted Sub-Total 24,180,281 8,199,868 5,450,216
Fund 416 7,215,983 6,347,637 12,134,997
29,981,860
1,819,434
24,180,281
7,215,983
25,506,924
2,075,722 8,199,868
6,347,637
24,038,243
1,834,038
5,450,216
12,134,997
-
5,000,000
10,000,000
15,000,000
20,000,000
25,000,000
30,000,000
35,000,000
Fund 405 Fund 410 Fund 415 Unrestricted
Sub-Total
Fund 416
Cash by Fund
FY 22-23
Acutal
FY 21-22
Actual
FY 20-21
Actual
Prepared 9/15/2022Page 7 of 8
CITY OF PALM SPRINGS
Financial Summary
Ending August 31, 2022
Coronavirus Aid,
Relief, and Economic
Security Act (CARES)
-
Expires - May 10,
2024
Coronavirus
Response and Relief
Supplemental
Appropriations
(CRRSA)- Airport
Operations
Expires - April 14,
2025
Coronavirus
Response and Relief
Supplemental
Appropriations
(CRRSA)- Concessions
Expires - May 31,
2025
American Rescue
Plan Act of 2021
(ARPA) - Concession
Expires - May 31,
2025
American Rescue
Plan Act of 2021
(ARPA) - Airport
Operations
Expires - August
10, 2025
Bipartisan
Infrastructure Law
(BIL)*
Expires - 2027
Beginning Balance 11,067,877 4,783,916 280,390 1,121,560 10,791,632 5,100,000
Use as of 6/30/21 5,078,179 -----
Use as of 6/30/22 ------
Use as of 8/31/23 ------
Remaining Balance 5,989,698 4,783,916 280,390 1,121,560 10,791,632 5,100,000
$11,067,877.0
$4,783,916.0
$280,390.0
$1,121,560.0
$10,791,632.0
$5,100,000.0
Use as of 6/30/21
$5,078,179
Use as of 6/30/21
$-
Use as of 6/30/21
$-
Use as of 6/30/21
$-
Use as of 6/30/21
$-$0
$2,000,000
$4,000,000
$6,000,000
$8,000,000
$10,000,000
$12,000,000
Grants -Remaining Balance
Prepared 9/15/2022Page 8 of 8
ITEM 12 .A / AC 0 9 -2 1 -2 2 Page 1 | 2
ITEM 12.A - PAST CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS
Airport Commission Meeting of September 21, 2022
City Council Meeting of September 1, 2022:
1. CONSENT CALENDAR:
SUBJECT
FINDINGS TO CONDUCT CITY COUNCIL AND BOARD, COMMISSION, AND
COMMITTEE MEETINGS VIRTUALLY UNDER ASSEMBLY BILL 361
RECOMMENDATION:
Find that the City Council has considered the circumstances of the state of emergency
during a proclaimed state of emergency, and state or local officials have imposed or
recommended measures to promote social distancing, and as a result, the Palm Springs
City Council and all of Palm Springs Board, Commission, and Committee meetings will
be held by videoconference, in accordance with AB 361.
Attachments
Item 1A
MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER HOLSTEGE, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER KORS,
CARRIED 5-0.
The Palm Springs City Council and all of Palm Springs Board, Commission, and
Committee meetings will be held by videoconference, in accordance with AB 361.
SUBJECT
APPROVE A ONE-YEAR SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT WITH LNRS DATA
SERVICES, INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $21,157 TO ACCESS CIRIUM DIIO MI, AN
INTERNET-BASED AIRLINE MARKETING AND OPERATIONS DATABASE, FOR
THE PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve a one-year subscription agreement with LNRS Data Services, Inc. in the
amount of $21,157 to access CIRIUM DIIO Mi, an internet-based airline marketing and
operations database, commencing on July 1, 2022, and ending on June 30, 2023.
Attachments
Item 1M
MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER HOLSTEGE, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER KORS,
CARRIED 5-0.
SUBJECT
ACCEPTANCE OF AIRPORT PASSENGER BOARDING BRIDGES, CITY PROJECT
19-34
RECOMMENDATION:
ITEM 12 .A / AC 0 9 -2 1 -2 2 Page 2 | 2
1. Accept the new passenger boarding bridges and associated improvements
identified as Airport Passenger Boarding Bridges, City Project 19-34, as
completed.
2. Authorize the City Engineer to execute and file for recordation with the Riverside
County Recorder a Notice of Completion for Airport Passenger Boarding Bridges,
City Project No. 19-34.
Attachments
Item 1N
MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER HOLSTEGE, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER KORS,
CARRIED 5-0.
SUBJECT
PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BRAND UPDATE
RECOMMENDATION:
Review and approve the Palm Springs International Airport branding work included as
"Attachment A" and direct Staff to proceed with the selection of Design No. 3, Modern
Palm, for the Airport logo and brand colors.
Attachments
Item 1O
Memorandum to City Council
This item was removed from the consent calendar.
SUBJECT
APPROVE AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO CONTRACT SERVICES AGREEMENT NO.
A9081 WITH WEST AVIATION SERVICES - SAN DIEGO, INC., DBA SIERRA
AVIATION GROUP
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Approve Amendment No. 1 to Agreement No. A9081 with Sierra Aviation Group
in the amount of $709,965 for baggage relocation and directional staff services
related to Palm Springs International Airport and extend the term by 12 months
through May 31, 2023.
2. Approve the appropriation of $709.965 for FY 2022-23 from the Department of
Aviation Fund 415 fund balance.
3. Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute all necessary documents.
Attachments
Item 1P
MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER HOLSTEGE, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER KORS,
CARRIED 5-0.
ITEM 12 . B / AC 9 - 2 1 - 2 2 Page 1 | 1
ITEM 12.B - FUTURE CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS
Airport Commission Meeting of September 21, 2022
-October 13th: Ready Credit Corp – Lease Agreement
-October 13th: Amendment to Commercial Vehicle Ordinance
-October 13th: Covid Clinic – Lease Agreement
-October 13th: Kone Inc. – Maintenance Agreement
Palm Springs International Airport
MONTHLY PASSENGER ACTIVITY REPORT - 2022
2022 2021 % Change 2022 2021 % Change 2022 2021 % Change
January 118,204 39,614 198.4%119,184 39,468 202.0%237,388 79,082 200.2%
February 142,206 57,530 147.2%150,130 63,127 137.8%292,336 120,657 142.3%
March 202,993 107,577 88.7%200,890 106,900 87.9%403,883 214,477 88.3%
April 185,946 111,376 67.0%172,169 104,401 64.9%358,115 215,777 66.0%
May 123,736 92,820 33.3%109,503 81,715 34.0%233,239 174,535 33.6%
June 73,861 66,885 10.4%68,663 62,987 9.0%142,524 129,872 9.7%
July 68,071 65,869 3.3%65,593 63,594 3.1%133,664 129,463 3.2%
August 65,368 58,793 11.2%64,584 59,159 9.2%129,952 117,952 10.2%
September 65,682 -100.0%70,984 -100.0%- 136,666 -100.0%
October 108,923 -100.0%117,068 -100.0%- 225,991 -100.0%
November 135,677 -100.0%136,267 -100.0%- 271,944 -100.0%
December 136,897 -100.0%139,630 -100.0%- 276,527 -100.0%
Year to Date 980,385 1,047,643 63.3%950,716 1,045,300 63.5%1,931,101 2,092,943 63.4%
Enplaned Deplaned Total Passengers
ITEM 13.A
Page 1 of 5
Palm Springs International Airport
Best Month Comparison
ENPLANEMENTS
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Vs Best Mo
Jan 117,179 140,896 136,157 39,614 118,204 -16.1%
Feb 132,238 156,486 156,909 57,530 142,206 -9.4%
Mar 170,949 201,350 113,166 107,577 202,993 0.8%
Apr 144,608 160,452 5,811 111,376 185,946 15.9%
May 88,714 99,027 10,751 92,820 123,736 25.0%
Jun 48,620 55,385 14,827 66,885 73,861 10.4%
Jul 45,758 49,864 17,231 65,869 68,071 3.3%
Aug 41,838 48,112 18,389 58,793 65,368 11.2%
Sep 50,586 52,283 23,087 65,682 -100.0%
Oct 79,568 84,627 41,597 108,923 -100.0%
Nov 122,254 117,794 52,874 135,677 -100.0%
Dec 121,995 121,198 41,517 136,897 -100.0%
TOTAL 1,164,307 1,287,474 632,316 1,047,643 980,385 -23.9%
% Chg.10.39%10.58%-50.89%65.68%
TOTAL PASSENGERS
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Vs Best Mo
Jan 236,776 280,738 276,099 79,082 237,388 -15.4%
Feb 272,495 317,535 320,906 120,657 292,336 -8.9%
Mar 341,412 401,972 198,850 214,477 403,883 0.5%
Apr 267,638 304,855 10,082 215,777 358,115 17.5%
May 168,619 190,756 19,154 174,535 233,239 22.3%
Jun 94,024 105,350 28,748 129,872 142,524 9.7%
Jul 89,580 97,834 33,776 129,463 133,664 3.2%
Aug 85,548 97,941 36,482 117,952 129,952 10.2%
Sep 102,887 106,211 47,915 136,666 -100.0%
Oct 167,459 177,363 88,777 225,991 -100.0%
Nov 245,841 235,656 108,043 271,944 -100.0%
Dec 254,739 247,744 83,262 276,527 -100.0%
TOTAL 2,327,018 2,563,955 1,252,094 2,092,943 1,931,101 -24.7%
% Chg.10.81%10.18%-51.17%67.16%
Page 2 of 5
Palm Springs International Airport
ACTIVITY BY AIRLINE
JULY 2022
(E & D)
AIRLINES 2022 2021 % Change 2022 2021 % Change 2022 2021 % Change Market Share
Air Canada - - 0.0%- - 0.0%- - 0.0%0.0%
Alaska 14,702 12,625 16.5%13,669 12,416 10.1%28,371 25,041 13.3%21.2%
American 9,644 10,063 -4.2%8,834 9,607 -8.0%18,478 19,670 -6.1%13.8%
Delta Air - 2,914 -100.0%- 2,582 -100.0%- 5,496 -100.0%0.0%
Mesa (AA)2,251 3,921 -42.6%2,319 3,249 -28.6%4,570 7,170 -36.3%3.4%
SkyWest (Delta Connection)4,780 5,302 -9.8%4,758 5,570 -14.6%9,538 10,872 -12.3%7.1%
SkyWest (United Express)7,899 7,612 3.8%7,455 7,355 1.4%15,354 14,967 2.6%11.5%
SkyWest (AA)3,340 5,089 -34.4%3,116 4,821 -35.4%6,456 9,910 -34.9%4.8%
Southwest Air 19,725 14,659 34.6%19,019 14,453 31.6%38,744 29,112 33.1%29.0%
United 2,105 2,610 -19.3%2,980 2,440 22.1%5,085 5,050 0.7%3.8%
WestJet 3,379 531 536.3%3,232 629 413.8%6,611 1,160 469.9%4.9%
Allegiant Air - 543 -100.0%- 472 -100.0%- 1,015 -100.0%0.0%
ExpressJet 246 - 100.0%211 - 100.0%457 - 100.0%0.3%
Flair - - 0.0%- - 0.0%- - 0.0%0.0%
JetBlue - - 0.0%- - 0.0%- - 0.0%0.0%
MN Airlines (Sun Country)- - 0.0%- - 0.0%- - 0.0%0.0%
Swoop Air - - 0.0%- - 0.0%- - 0.0%0.0%
Charters - - 0.0%- - 0.0%- - 0.0%0.0%
TOTAL 68,071 65,869 3.3%65,593 63,594 3.1%133,664 129,463 3.2%100.0%
Enplaned Deplaned Total
Page 3 of 5
Palm Springs International Airport
ACTIVITY BY AIRLINE
AUGUST 2022
(E & D)
AIRLINES 2022 2021 % Change 2022 2021 % Change 2022 2021 % Change Market Share
Air Canada - - 0.0%- - 0.0%- - 0.0%0.0%
Alaska 13,491 11,661 15.7%13,630 11,940 14.2%27,121 23,601 14.9%20.9%
American 11,922 8,040 48.3%11,253 7,080 58.9%23,175 15,120 53.3%17.8%
Delta Air - 2,272 -100.0%- 2,146 -100.0%- 4,418 -100.0%0.0%
Mesa (AA)813 3,870 -79.0%849 3,494 -75.7%1,662 7,364 -77.4%1.3%
SkyWest (Delta Connection)4,800 5,356 -10.4%5,026 5,719 -12.1%9,826 11,075 -11.3%7.6%
SkyWest (United Express)7,888 8,882 -11.2%7,984 8,741 -8.7%15,872 17,623 -9.9%12.2%
SkyWest (AA)2,767 4,370 -36.7%2,469 4,327 -42.9%5,236 8,697 -39.8%4.0%
Southwest Air 17,689 13,026 35.8%17,598 14,453 21.8%35,287 27,479 28.4%27.2%
United 2,821 - 100.0%2,681 - 100.0%5,502 - 100.0%4.2%
WestJet 2,928 1,059 176.5%2,862 1,023 179.8%5,790 2,082 178.1%4.5%
Allegiant Air - 257 -100.0%- 236 -100.0%- 493 -100.0%0.0%
ExpressJet 249 - 100.0%232 - 100.0%481 - 100.0%0.4%
Flair - - 0.0%- - 0.0%- - 0.0%0.0%
JetBlue - - 0.0%- - 0.0%- - 0.0%0.0%
MN Airlines (Sun Country)- - 0.0%- - 0.0%- - 0.0%0.0%
Swoop Air - - 0.0%- - 0.0%- - 0.0%0.0%
Charters - - 0.0%- - 0.0%- - 0.0%0.0%
TOTAL 65,368 58,793 11.2%64,584 59,159 9.2%129,952 117,952 10.2%100.0%
Enplaned Deplaned Total
Page 4 of 5
Palm Springs International Airport
AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS 2022
2022 2021 vs. Prior 2022
ITINERANT AC AT GA MI AC & AT TOTAL TOTAL CHANGE GA/CIVIL %
Jan 2,851 1,276 1,953 72 4,127 6,152 4,948 24.3%31.7%
Feb 2,745 1,200 1,983 91 3,945 6,019 4,812 25.1%32.9%
Mar 3,405 1,465 2,245 77 4,870 7,192 5,703 26.1%31.2%
Apr 3,297 1,312 2,071 124 4,609 6,804 5,435 25.2%30.4%
May 2,327 777 1,483 105 3,104 4,692 4,431 5.9%31.6%
Jun 1,699 483 767 56 2,182 3,005 3,120 -3.7%25.5%
Jul 1,663 357 697 89 2,020 2,806 2,745 2.2%24.8%
Aug 1,663 391 735 64 2,054 2,853 2,661 7.2%25.8%
Sep - - 3,020 #DIV/0!
Oct - - 4,881 #DIV/0!
Nov - - 6,287 #DIV/0!
Dec - - 5,773 #DIV/0!
TOTAL 19,650 7,261 11,934 678 26,911 39,523 53,816 16.7%30.2%
2022 2021
vs. Prior
Yr.2022
LOCAL CIVIL MI TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL CHANGE GA/CIVIL %
Jan 428 14 442 6,594 5,210 26.6%36.1%
Feb 214 30 244 6,263 5,108 22.6%35.1%
Mar 238 1 239 7,431 6,001 23.8%33.4%
Apr 218 1 219 7,023 5,665 24.0%32.6%
May 410 12 422 5,114 4,830 5.9%37.0%
Jun 90 2 92 3,097 3,704 -16.4%27.7%
Jul 96 4 100 2,906 3,075 -5.5%27.3%
Aug 264 16 280 3,133 2,844 10.2%31.9%
Sep - - 3,228 #DIV/0!
Oct - - 5,543 #DIV/0!
Nov - - 6,651 #DIV/0!
Dec - - 6,278 #DIV/0!
TOTAL 1,958 80 2,038 41,561 58,137 14.1%33.4%
2022
2022
Page 5 of 5
Palm Springs International Airport
PASSENGER ACTIVITY REPORT - FISCAL YEAR COMPARISON
FY '21-'22 % CHANGE FY '20-'21 % CHANGE FY '19-'20 % CHANGE FY '18-'19 FY '21-'22 % CHANGE FY '20-'21 % CHANGE FY '19-'20 % CHANGE FY '18-'19 FY '21-'22 % CHANGE FY '20-'21 % CHANGE FY '19-'20 % CHANGE FY '18-'19
July 65,869 282%17,231 -65%49,864 9%45,758 63,594 284%16,545 -66%47,970 9%43,822 129,463 283%33,776 -65%97,834 9%89,580
August 58,793 220%18,389 -62%48,112 15%41,838 59,159 227%18,093 -64%49,829 14%43,710 117,952 223%36,482 -63%97,941 14%85,548
September 65,682 184%23,087 -56%52,283 3%50,586 70,984 186%24,828 -54%53,928 3%52,301 136,666 185%47,915 -55%106,211 3%102,887
October 108,923 162%41,597 -51%84,627 6%79,568 117,068 148%47,180 -49%92,736 6%87,891 225,991 155%88,777 -50%177,363 6%167,459
November 135,677 157%52,874 -55%117,794 -4%122,254 136,267 147%55,169 -53%117,862 -5%123,587 271,944 152%108,043 -54%235,656 -4%245,841
December 136,897 230%41,517 -66%121,198 -1%121,995 139,630 234%41,745 -67%126,546 -5%132,744 276,527 232%83,262 -66%247,744 -3%254,739
January 118,204 198%39,614 -71%136,157 -3%140,896 119,184 202%39,468 -72%139,942 0%139,842 237,388 200%79,082 -71%276,099 -2%280,738
February 142,206 147%57,530 -63%156,909 0%156,486 150,130 138%63,127 -62%163,997 2%161,049 292,336 142%120,657 -62%320,906 1%317,535
March 202,993 89%107,577 -5%113,166 -44%201,350 200,890 88%106,900 25%85,684 -57%200,622 403,883 88%214,477 8%198,850 -51%401,972
April 185,946 67%111,376 1817%5,811 -96%160,452 172,169 65%104,401 2344%4,271 -97%144,403 358,115 66%215,777 2040%10,082 -97%304,855
May 123,736 33%92,820 763%10,751 -89%99,027 109,503 34%81,715 872%8,403 -91%91,729 233,239 34%174,535 811%19,154 -90%190,756
June 73,861 10%66,885 351%14,827 -73%55,385 68,663 9%62,987 352%13,921 -72%49,965 142,524 10%129,872 352%28,748 -73%105,350
YTD 1,418,787 112%670,497 -26%911,499 -29%1,275,595 1,407,241 113%662,158 -27%905,089 -29%1,271,665 2,826,028 112%1,332,655 -27%1,816,588 -29%2,547,260
ENPLANED PASSENGERS DEPLANED PASSENGERS TOTAL PASSENGERS
ITEM 13.B
AIRLINE ORIGIN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Th Fr Sa Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su Mo Tu We Th Fr
Alaska Airlines AS 3301 Portland, OR 2243 1 1 1
Alaska Airlines AS 3458 San Francisco, CA 0940 1 1 1 1 1 1
Alaska Airlines AS 3458 San Francisco, CA 1006 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Alaska Airlines AS 3367 San Francisco, CA 1440 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Alaska Airlines AS 2283 San Francisco, CA 1605 1 1
Alaska Airlines AS 3367 San Francisco, CA 1615 1 1 1 1
Alaska Airlines AS 3356 San Francisco, CA 1750 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Alaska Airlines AS 3356 San Francisco, CA 2055 1 1 1 1
Alaska Airlines AS 3392 San Francisco, CA 2214 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Alaska Airlines AS 3392 San Francisco, CA 2302 1 1 1
Alaska Airlines AS 3438 San Jose, CA 1152 1
Alaska Airlines AS 3431 San Jose, CA 2000 1 1 1 1 1
Alaska Airlines AS 3431 San Jose, CA 2008 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Alaska Airlines AS 3431 San Jose, CA 2023 1 1 1
Alaska Airlines AS 3436 Seattle, WA 1322 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Alaska Airlines AS 3436 Seattle, WA 1327 1 1 1 1 1 1
Alaska Airlines AS 88 Seattle, WA 1820 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Alaska Airlines AS 1320 Seattle, WA 1842 1 1 1 1 1
Alaska Airlines AS 3423 Seattle, WA 2107 1 1 1 1 1
Alaska Airlines AS 114 Seattle, WA 2337 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
American Airlines AA 2880 Chicago-O'Hare, IL 1235 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
American Airlines AA 2673 Dallas/Fort Worth, TX 1157 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
American Airlines AA 2673 Dallas/Fort Worth, TX 1159 1 1 1 1 1 1
American Airlines AA 2709 Dallas/Fort Worth, TX 1822 1 1 1
American Airlines AA 2709 Dallas/Fort Worth, TX 2027 1 1 1 1 1 1
American Airlines AA 2709 Dallas/Fort Worth, TX 2028 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
American Airlines AA 2709 Dallas/Fort Worth, TX 2053 1 1 1 1 1 1
American Airlines AA 2709 Dallas/Fort Worth, TX 2054 1
American Airlines AA 3109 Phoenix, AZ 1109 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
American Airlines AA 1310 Phoenix, AZ 1117 1 1 1 1
American Airlines AA 1310 Phoenix, AZ 1118 1
American Airlines AA 1310 Phoenix, AZ 1127 1
American Airlines AA 1307 Phoenix, AZ 1513 1 1 1 1 1
American Airlines AA 1307 Phoenix, AZ 1549 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
American Airlines AA 3085 Phoenix, AZ 1554 1 1 1 1 1 1
American Airlines AA 3085 Phoenix, AZ 1611 1 1 1 1
American Airlines AA 3085 Phoenix, AZ 1746 1
American Airlines AA 1861 Phoenix, AZ 1818 1
American Airlines AA 3041 Phoenix, AZ 1822 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
American Airlines AA 3085 Phoenix, AZ 2122 1 1 1 1 1
American Airlines AA 3085 Phoenix, AZ 2123 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Delta Air Lines DL 4018 Salt Lake City, UT 1150 1 1 1 1 1
Delta Air Lines DL 4018 Salt Lake City, UT 1158 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Delta Air Lines DL 3911 Salt Lake City, UT 1615 1 1 1
Delta Air Lines DL 3911 Salt Lake City, UT 1639 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Delta Air Lines DL 4001 Salt Lake City, UT 2130 1 1 1 1 1
Delta Air Lines DL 4001 Salt Lake City, UT 2136 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
ExpressJet EV 7031 Reno, NV 0835 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
SEPTEMBER 2022 - PSP FLIGHT ARRIVALS
Airline
Code
ARVL
TIME
ARRIVALS - SEPTEMBER 2022 TRAVEL DATE
PUBLISHED FLIGHTS via DIIO as of 08-02-22 - SUBJECT TO CHANGE - ALWAYS VERIFY WITH AIRLINES TO CONFIRM ACCURACY
Flight
Number
Page 1 of 6 09-2022 - PSP AIRLINE SCHEDULES
ITEM 13.C
AIRLINE ORIGIN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Th Fr Sa Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su Mo Tu We Th Fr
Southwest Airlines WN 2817 Denver, CO 1005 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 2817 Denver, CO 1445 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 2817 Denver, CO 1455 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 1099 Denver, CO 1610 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 1409 Denver, CO 1610 1
Southwest Airlines WN 1177 Denver, CO 1650 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 4033 Denver, CO 1700 1
Southwest Airlines WN 522 Las Vegas, NV 1030 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 4512 Las Vegas, NV 1130 1
Southwest Airlines WN 509 Las Vegas, NV 1245 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 6050 Las Vegas, NV 1255 1
Southwest Airlines WN 522 Las Vegas, NV 1300 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 1177 Las Vegas, NV 1650 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 2169 Las Vegas, NV 1755 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 295 Las Vegas, NV 1800 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 1421 Las Vegas, NV 1900 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 201 Phoenix, AZ 0935 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 4797 Phoenix, AZ 1005 1
Southwest Airlines WN 1981 Phoenix, AZ 1010 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 181 Oakland, CA 1125 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 2618 Oakland, CA 1150 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 6035 Oakland, CA 1150 1
Southwest Airlines WN 2395 Oakland, CA 1200 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 2395 Oakland, CA 1315 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 2273 Phoenix, AZ 1435 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 570 Phoenix, AZ 1450 1
Southwest Airlines WN 2362 Phoenix, AZ 1505 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 5400 Oakland, CA 1940 1
Southwest Airlines WN 286 Oakland, CA 2030 1
Southwest Airlines WN 2359 Oakland, CA 2030 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 426 Phoenix, AZ 2040 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 813 Oakland, CA 2045 1
Southwest Airlines WN 4109 Oakland, CA 2105 1
Southwest Airlines WN 1467 Oakland, CA 2130 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 1467 Oakland, CA 2140 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 2143 Oakland, CA 2140 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 1566 Phoenix, AZ 2310 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 6084 Sacramento, CA 1050 1
Southwest Airlines WN 181 Sacramento, CA 1200 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 2393 Sacramento, CA 1410 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 3103 Sacramento, CA 1535 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 4111 Sacramento, CA 1545 1
Southwest Airlines WN 438 Sacramento, CA 1635 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Sun Country SY 617 Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN 1715 1
Sun Country SY 615 Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN 1725 1 1
United Airlines UA 769 Chicago-O'Hare, IL 1144 1
United Airlines UA 535 Denver, CO 1233 1
United Airlines UA 535 Denver, CO 1235 1
United Airlines UA 4721 Denver, CO 1236 1 1 1 1 1
United Airlines UA 535 Denver, CO 1239 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
United Airlines UA 2662 Denver, CO 1718 1
United Airlines UA 4754 Denver, CO 1721 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
United Airlines UA 4754 Denver, CO 1725 1
United Airlines UA 5560 Denver, CO 1730 1 1 1 1 1
United Airlines UA 5575 Denver, CO 2009 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
United Airlines UA 4705 Denver, CO 2017 1
United Airlines UA 4695 Denver, CO 2020 1 1 1 1 1
Airline
Code
Flight
Number
ARVL
TIME
ARRIVALS - SEPTEMBER 2022 TRAVEL DATE
Page 2 of 6 09-2022 - PSP AIRLINE SCHEDULES
AIRLINE ORIGIN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Th Fr Sa Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su Mo Tu We Th Fr
United Airlines UA 2475 San Francisco, CA 1011 1
United Airlines UA 277 San Francisco, CA 1228 1 1 1 1
United Airlines UA 277 San Francisco, CA 1232 1
United Airlines UA 5628 San Francisco, CA 1241 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
United Airlines UA 4780 San Francisco, CA 1524 1
United Airlines UA 4675 San Francisco, CA 1532 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
United Airlines UA 5355 San Francisco, CA 1748 1
United Airlines UA 5703 San Francisco, CA 1804 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
United Airlines UA 5703 San Francisco, CA 1810 1 1 1 1 1
United Airlines UA 5869 San Francisco, CA 2202 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
United Airlines UA 5869 San Francisco, CA 2205 1 1 1 1 1
United Airlines UA 5869 San Francisco, CA 2220 1
WestJet WS 1468 Calgary, AB, Canada 1208 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
WestJet WS 1722 Vancouver, BC, Canada 1052 1 1 1 1
WestJet WS 1722 Vancouver, BC, Canada 1217 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Airline
Code
Flight
Number
ARVL
TIME
ARRIVALS - SEPTEMBER 2022 TRAVEL DATE
Page 3 of 6 09-2022 - PSP AIRLINE SCHEDULES
AIRLINE DESTINATION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Th Fr Sa Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su Mo Tu We Th Fr
Alaska Airlines AS 3420 Portland, OR 0930 1 1 1
Alaska Airlines AS 3312 San Francisco, CA 0600 1 1 1 1 1 1
Alaska Airlines AS 3312 San Francisco, CA 0650 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Alaska Airlines AS 3458 San Francisco, CA 1020 1 1 1 1 1 1
Alaska Airlines AS 3458 San Francisco, CA 1055 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Alaska Airlines AS 3369 San Francisco, CA 1405 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Alaska Airlines AS 2283 San Francisco, CA 1645 1 1
Alaska Airlines AS 3367 San Francisco, CA 1655 1 1 1
Alaska Airlines AS 3356 San Francisco, CA 1830 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Alaska Airlines AS 3356 San Francisco, CA 2135 1 1
Alaska Airlines AS 3428 San Jose, CA 0800 1 1 1 1 1 1
Alaska Airlines AS 3428 San Jose, CA 0900 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Alaska Airlines AS 3455 Seattle, WA 0700 1 1 1 1 1 1
Alaska Airlines AS 145 Seattle, WA 0800 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Alaska Airlines AS 3436 Seattle, WA 1407 1 1 1 1 1 1
Alaska Airlines AS 3436 Seattle, WA 1520 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Alaska Airlines AS 1073 Seattle, WA 1920 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Alaska Airlines AS 145 Seattle, WA 1942 1 1 1 1 1
American Airlines AA 2601 Chicago-O'Hare, IL 1315 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
American Airlines AA 2880 Chicago-O'Hare, IL 1349 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
American Airlines AA 2425 Dallas/Fort Worth, TX 0600 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
American Airlines AA 2673 Dallas/Fort Worth, TX 1254 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
American Airlines AA 2673 Dallas/Fort Worth, TX 1259 1 1 1 1 1 1
American Airlines AA 2986 Phoenix, AZ 0630 1
American Airlines AA 3090 Phoenix, AZ 0630 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
American Airlines AA 3016 Phoenix, AZ 0905 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
American Airlines AA 3016 Phoenix, AZ 0927 1 1 1 1 1 1
American Airlines AA 3109 Phoenix, AZ 1154 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
American Airlines AA 1310 Phoenix, AZ 1206 1 1 1 1 1
American Airlines AA 1310 Phoenix, AZ 1217 1
American Airlines AA 3109 Phoenix, AZ 1325 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
American Airlines AA 1307 Phoenix, AZ 1640 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Delta Air Lines DL 3854 Salt Lake City, UT 0600 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Delta Air Lines DL 4018 Salt Lake City, UT 1235 1 1 1 1 1
Delta Air Lines DL 4018 Salt Lake City, UT 1243 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Delta Air Lines DL 3911 Salt Lake City, UT 1700 1 1 1
Delta Air Lines DL 3911 Salt Lake City, UT 1724 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
ExpressJet EV 7032 Reno, NV 0915 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Airline
Code
DEP
TIME
DEPARTURES - SEPTEMBER 2022 TRAVEL DATE
SEPTEMBER 2022 - PSP FLIGHT DEPARTURES
PUBLISHED FLIGHTS via DIIO as of 08-02-22 - SUBJECT TO CHANGE - ALWAYS VERIFY WITH AIRLINES TO CONFIRM ACCURACY
Flight
Number
Page 4 of 6 09-2022 - PSP AIRLINE SCHEDULES
AIRLINE DESTINATION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Th Fr Sa Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su Mo Tu We Th Fr
Southwest Airlines WN 4080 Denver, CO 0625 1
Southwest Airlines WN 181 Denver, CO 1050 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 181 Denver, CO 1200 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 329 Denver, CO 1235 1
Southwest Airlines WN 181 Denver, CO 1250 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 509 Denver, CO 1320 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 2324 Las Vegas, NV 0735 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 2130 Las Vegas, NV 1040 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 6051 Las Vegas, NV 1130 1
Southwest Airlines WN 2376 Las Vegas, NV 1220 1
Southwest Airlines WN 2618 Las Vegas, NV 1225 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 2273 Las Vegas, NV 1530 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 3103 Las Vegas, NV 1610 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 2039 Las Vegas, NV 1845 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 3103 Las Vegas, NV 1845 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 2189 Oakland, CA 0625 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 2189 Oakland, CA 0640 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 2273 Oakland, CA 0645 1 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 2189 Oakland, CA 0650 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 2176 Oakland, CA 1620 1
Southwest Airlines WN 1099 Oakland, CA 1655 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 1409 Oakland, CA 1655 1
Southwest Airlines WN 1177 Oakland, CA 1705 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 1099 Oakland, CA 1710 1
Southwest Airlines WN 1177 Oakland, CA 1725 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 1177 Oakland, CA 1735 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 1325 Phoenix, AZ 0550 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 2191 Phoenix, AZ 0720 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 1784 Phoenix, AZ 1010 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 1718 Phoenix, AZ 1115 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 1325 Phoenix, AZ 1335 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 574 Phoenix, AZ 1535 1
Southwest Airlines WN 2363 Phoenix, AZ 1550 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 4033 Phoenix, AZ 1735 1
Southwest Airlines WN 4797 Sacramento, CA 1040 1
Southwest Airlines WN 1676 Sacramento, CA 1235 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 6056 Sacramento, CA 1335 1
Southwest Airlines WN 2817 Sacramento, CA 1350 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 2394 Sacramento, CA 1445 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 2817 Sacramento, CA 1520 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 2817 Sacramento, CA 1530 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Sun Country SY 618 Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN 1815 1
Sun Country SY 616 Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN 1825 1 1
United Airlines UA 2475 Chicago-O'Hare, IL 1113 1
United Airlines UA 5284 Denver, CO 0530 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
United Airlines UA 5521 Denver, CO 0530 1 1 1 1 1
United Airlines UA 5645 Denver, CO 0533 1
United Airlines UA 4689 Denver, CO 0908 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
United Airlines UA 5431 Denver, CO 1317 1 1 1 1 1
United Airlines UA 587 Denver, CO 1330 1
United Airlines UA 587 Denver, CO 1336 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Airline
Code
Flight
Number
DEP
TIME
DEPARTURES - SEPTEMBER 2022 TRAVEL DATE
Page 5 of 6 09-2022 - PSP AIRLINE SCHEDULES
AIRLINE DESTINATION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Th Fr Sa Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su Mo Tu We Th Fr
United Airlines UA 5617 San Francisco, CA 0600 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
United Airlines UA 5997 San Francisco, CA 0800 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
United Airlines UA 2481 San Francisco, CA 1329 1 1 1 1 1
United Airlines UA 2070 San Francisco, CA 1336 1
United Airlines UA 5610 San Francisco, CA 1341 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
United Airlines UA 5509 San Francisco, CA 1607 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
United Airlines UA 5509 San Francisco, CA 1615 1
WestJet WS 1469 Calgary, AB, Canada 1305 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
WestJet WS 1723 Vancouver, BC, Canada 1145 1 1 1 1
WestJet WS 1723 Vancouver, BC, Canada 1315 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Airline
Code
Flight
Number
DEP
TIME
DEPARTURES - SEPTEMBER 2022 TRAVEL DATE
Page 6 of 6 09-2022 - PSP AIRLINE SCHEDULES
AIRLINE ORIGIN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
Sa Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su Mo
Air Canada AC 1735 Toronto, ON, CA 1019 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Air Canada AC 1046 Vancouver, BC, CA 1152 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Air Canada AC 1046 Vancouver, BC, CA 1520 1 1
Alaska Airlines AS 231 Portland, OR 1040 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Alaska Airlines AS 2312 Portland, OR 1044 1 1 1 1
Alaska Airlines AS 3301 Portland, OR 2243 1
Alaska Airlines AS 3333 San Francisco, CA 1005 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Alaska Airlines AS 3458 San Francisco, CA 1006 1 1 1 1 1
Alaska Airlines AS 3367 San Francisco, CA 1429 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Alaska Airlines AS 3367 San Francisco, CA 1440 1 1 1 1 1
Alaska Airlines AS 3356 San Francisco, CA 1713 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Alaska Airlines AS 3356 San Francisco, CA 1750 1 1 1 1 1
Alaska Airlines AS 3392 San Francisco, CA 2214 1 1 1 1 1
Alaska Airlines AS 3392 San Francisco, CA 2230 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Alaska Airlines AS 3431 San Jose, CA 2008 1 1 1 1
Alaska Airlines AS 3431 San Jose, CA 2023 1
Alaska Airlines AS 3431 San Jose, CA 2148 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Alaska Airlines AS 1410 Seattle, WA 1124 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Alaska Airlines AS 3436 Seattle, WA 1322 1 1 1 1 1
Alaska Airlines AS 88 Seattle, WA 1815 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Alaska Airlines AS 88 Seattle, WA 1820 1 1 1 1 1
Alaska Airlines AS 114 Seattle, WA 2333 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Alaska Airlines AS 114 Seattle, WA 2337 1 1 1 1 1
Allegiant Air G4 303 Bellingham, WA 0843 1 1 1 1
Allegiant Air G4 303 Bellingham, WA 1803 1 1 1 1
Allegiant Air G4 303 Bellingham, WA 1833 1 1 1 1
Allegiant Air G4 1904 Bellingham, WA 1814 1
American Airlines AA 2880 Chicago-O'Hare, IL 1151 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
American Airlines AA 2880 Chicago-O'Hare, IL 1235 1 1 1 1 1
American Airlines AA 2673 Dallas/Fort Worth, TX 1157 1 1 1 1 1
American Airlines AA 2673 Dallas/Fort Worth, TX 1202 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
American Airlines AA 2709 Dallas/Fort Worth, TX 1822 1
American Airlines AA 2709 Dallas/Fort Worth, TX 2028 1 1
American Airlines AA 2709 Dallas/Fort Worth, TX 2049 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
American Airlines AA 2709 Dallas/Fort Worth, TX 2053 1 1
American Airlines AA 1890 Phoenix, AZ 1059 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
American Airlines AA 1890 Phoenix, AZ 1101 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
American Airlines AA 3109 Phoenix, AZ 1109 1 1 1 1 1
American Airlines AA 1307 Phoenix, AZ 1549 1 1
American Airlines AA 3085 Phoenix, AZ 1554 1 1
American Airlines AA 3191 Phoenix, AZ 1610 1 1
American Airlines AA 3085 Phoenix, AZ 1611 1
American Airlines AA 5756 Phoenix, AZ 1611 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
American Airlines AA 3041 Phoenix, AZ 1822 1 1 1 1 1
American Airlines AA 1006 Phoenix, AZ 1828 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
American Airlines AA 3085 Phoenix, AZ 2100 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
American Airlines AA 3085 Phoenix, AZ 2123 1 1
OCTOBER 2022 - PSP FLIGHT ARRIVALS
Airline
Code
ARVL
TIME
ARRIVALS - OCTOBER 2022 TRAVEL DATE
PUBLISHED FLIGHTS via DIIO as of 08/29/2022 - SUBJECT TO CHANGE - ALWAYS VERIFY WITH AIRLINES TO CONFIRM ACCURACY
Flight
Number
Page 1 of 6 10-2022 - PSP AIRLINE SCHEDULES
AIRLINE ORIGIN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
Sa Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su Mo
Delta Air Lines DL 1210 Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN 1048 1 1 1 1
Delta Air Lines DL 2302 Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN 1247 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Delta Air Lines DL 4018 Salt Lake City, UT 1158 1 1 1 1 1
Delta Air Lines DL 4018 Salt Lake City, UT 1200 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Delta Air Lines DL 3911 Salt Lake City, UT 1636 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Delta Air Lines DL 3911 Salt Lake City, UT 1639 1 1 1
Delta Air Lines DL 4001 Salt Lake City, UT 2136 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Flair Airlines F8 198 Toronto, ON, CA 1440 1
Flair Airlines F8 252 Vancouver, BC, CA 1740 1
JetBlue Airways B6 1849 New York-JFK, NY 2056 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 2817 Denver, CO 1005 1 1 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 2817 Denver, CO 1440 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 2817 Denver, CO 1445 1
Southwest Airlines WN 2817 Denver, CO 1455 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 1177 Denver, CO 1650 1 1 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 522 Las Vegas, NV 1030 1 1 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 522 Las Vegas, NV 1300 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 1177 Las Vegas, NV 1650 1 1 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 433 Las Vegas, NV 1755 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 2169 Las Vegas, NV 1755 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 1421 Las Vegas, NV 1900 1 1 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 181 Oakland, CA 1125 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 2395 Oakland, CA 1200 1 1 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 2395 Oakland, CA 1315 1 1 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 1467 Oakland, CA 2130 1 1 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 1467 Oakland, CA 2140 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 2143 Oakland, CA 2140 1 1 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 1981 Phoenix, AZ 1010 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 2273 Phoenix, AZ 1435 1 1 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 426 Phoenix, AZ 2040 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 1566 Phoenix, AZ 2310 1 1 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 181 Sacramento, CA 1200 1 1 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 3103 Sacramento, CA 1535 1 1 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 438 Sacramento, CA 1635 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Sun Country Inc SY 617 Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN 1215 1 1
Sun Country Inc SY 615 Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN 1245 1
Sun Country Inc SY 615 Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN 1315 1 1 1
Sun Country Inc SY 615 Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN 1316 1
Sun Country Inc SY 617 Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN 1530 1
Sun Country Inc SY 617 Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN 1700 1
Sun Country Inc SY 617 Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN 1715 1 1 1
Sun Country Inc SY 617 Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN 1717 1
Sun Country Inc SY 615 Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN 1725 1 1
Sun Country Inc SY 617 Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN 1725 1 1
Sun Country Inc SY 615 Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN 1730 1 1 1
Sun Country Inc SY 615 Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN 1735 1 1 1
United Airlines UA 1199 Chicago-O'Hare, IL 1112 1 1
United Airlines UA 1549 Chicago-O'Hare, IL 1144 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Airline
Code
Flight
Number
ARVL
TIME
ARRIVALS - OCTOBER 2022 TRAVEL DATE
Page 2 of 6 10-2022 - PSP AIRLINE SCHEDULES
AIRLINE ORIGIN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
Sa Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su Mo
United Airlines UA 5577 Denver, CO 0927 1 1
United Airlines UA 1294 Denver, CO 1232 1 1
United Airlines UA 535 Denver, CO 1233 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
United Airlines UA 2662 Denver, CO 1718 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
United Airlines UA 4705 Denver, CO 2006 1
United Airlines UA 4705 Denver, CO 2017 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
United Airlines UA 2304 Denver, CO 2023 1 1
United Airlines UA 2010 Denver, CO 2213 1
United Airlines UA 5244 Houston-Intercontinental, TX 1134 1 1
United Airlines UA 5266 Houston-Intercontinental, TX 1952 1 1
United Airlines UA 2499 San Francisco, CA 1015 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
United Airlines UA 2475 San Francisco, CA 1016 1 1
United Airlines UA 4780 San Francisco, CA 1457 1 1
United Airlines UA 4780 San Francisco, CA 1524 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
United Airlines UA 5355 San Francisco, CA 1748 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
United Airlines UA 5355 San Francisco, CA 1753 1
United Airlines UA 5703 San Francisco, CA 1805 1 1
United Airlines UA 5705 San Francisco, CA 2022 1 1
United Airlines UA 5869 San Francisco, CA 2220 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
United Airlines UA 5869 San Francisco, CA 2225 1 1 1
United Airlines UA 5869 San Francisco, CA 2230 1
WestJet WS 1468 Calgary, AB, CA 1208 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
WestJet WS 1474 Calgary, AB, CA 1634 1 1
WestJet WS 1722 Vancouver, BC, CA 1052 1 1 1 1
WestJet WS 1722 Vancouver, BC, CA 1217 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
WestJet WS 1722 Vancouver, BC, CA 1221 1 1
WestJet WS 1726 Vancouver, BC, CA 1323 1
WestJet WS 1726 Vancouver, BC, CA 1523 1
Airline
Code
Flight
Number
ARVL
TIME
ARRIVALS - OCTOBER 2022 TRAVEL DATE
Page 3 of 6 10-2022 - PSP AIRLINE SCHEDULES
AIRLINE DESTINATION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
Sa Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su Mo
Air Canada AC 1734 Toronto, ON, CA 1135 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Air Canada AC 1047 Vancouver, BC, CA 1245 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Air Canada AC 1047 Vancouver, BC, CA 1610 1 1
Alaska Airlines AS 3420 Portland, OR 0930 1
Alaska Airlines AS 2312 Portland, OR 1130 1 1 1 1
Alaska Airlines AS 232 Portland, OR 1135 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Alaska Airlines AS 3312 San Francisco, CA 0650 1 1 1 1 1
Alaska Airlines AS 3312 San Francisco, CA 0805 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Alaska Airlines AS 3458 San Francisco, CA 1045 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Alaska Airlines AS 3458 San Francisco, CA 1055 1 1 1 1 1
Alaska Airlines AS 3369 San Francisco, CA 1405 1 1 1 1 1
Alaska Airlines AS 3369 San Francisco, CA 1510 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Alaska Airlines AS 3332 San Francisco, CA 1755 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Alaska Airlines AS 3356 San Francisco, CA 1830 1 1 1 1 1
Alaska Airlines AS 3428 San Jose, CA 0900 1 1 1 1 1
Alaska Airlines AS 3428 San Jose, CA 0910 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Alaska Airlines AS 145 Seattle, WA 0700 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Alaska Airlines AS 145 Seattle, WA 0800 1 1 1 1 1
Alaska Airlines AS 1411 Seattle, WA 1219 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Alaska Airlines AS 3436 Seattle, WA 1520 1 1 1 1 1
Alaska Airlines AS 1073 Seattle, WA 1910 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Alaska Airlines AS 1073 Seattle, WA 1920 1 1 1 1 1
Allegiant Air G4 299 Bellingham, WA 0928 1 1 1 1
Allegiant Air G4 299 Bellingham, WA 1848 1 1 1 1
Allegiant Air G4 288 Bellingham, WA 1859 1
Allegiant Air G4 299 Bellingham, WA 1918 1 1 1 1
American Airlines AA 2298 Chicago-O'Hare, IL 1241 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
American Airlines AA 2601 Chicago-O'Hare, IL 1315 1 1 1
American Airlines AA 2880 Chicago-O'Hare, IL 1349 1 1
American Airlines AA 2425 Dallas/Fort Worth, TX 0600 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
American Airlines AA 2673 Dallas/Fort Worth, TX 1254 1 1 1 1 1
American Airlines AA 2673 Dallas/Fort Worth, TX 1257 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
American Airlines AA 3090 Phoenix, AZ 0630 1 1 1 1 1
American Airlines AA 1009 Phoenix, AZ 0644 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
American Airlines AA 3055 Phoenix, AZ 0644 1
American Airlines AA 3016 Phoenix, AZ 0835 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
American Airlines AA 3016 Phoenix, AZ 0905 1 1 1 1 1
American Airlines AA 1036 Phoenix, AZ 1154 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
American Airlines AA 1890 Phoenix, AZ 1154 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
American Airlines AA 3109 Phoenix, AZ 1154 1 1
American Airlines AA 3109 Phoenix, AZ 1325 1 1 1
American Airlines AA 1307 Phoenix, AZ 1640 1 1
American Airlines AA 5756 Phoenix, AZ 1654 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Delta Air Lines DL 1210 Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN 1150 1 1 1 1
Delta Air Lines DL 2302 Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN 1347 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
OCTOBER 2022 - PSP FLIGHT DEPARTURES
PUBLISHED FLIGHTS via DIIO as of 08/29/2022 - SUBJECT TO CHANGE - ALWAYS VERIFY WITH AIRLINES TO CONFIRM ACCURACY
Airline
Code
DEP
TIME
DEPARTURES - OCTOBER 2022 TRAVEL DATEFlight
Number
Page 4 of 6 10-2022 - PSP AIRLINE SCHEDULES
AIRLINE DESTINATION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
Sa Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su Mo
Delta Air Lines DL 3854 Salt Lake City, UT 0600 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Delta Air Lines DL 3854 Salt Lake City, UT 0601 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Delta Air Lines DL 4018 Salt Lake City, UT 1243 1 1 1 1 1
Delta Air Lines DL 4018 Salt Lake City, UT 1245 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Delta Air Lines DL 3911 Salt Lake City, UT 1723 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Delta Air Lines DL 3911 Salt Lake City, UT 1724 1 1 1
Flair Airlines F8 199 Toronto, ON, CA 1530 1
Flair Airlines F8 253 Vancouver, BC, CA 1825 1
JetBlue Airways B6 2050 New York-JFK, NY 2159 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 181 Denver, CO 1050 1 1 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 181 Denver, CO 1200 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 181 Denver, CO 1250 1 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 181 Denver, CO 1255 1
Southwest Airlines WN 2324 Las Vegas, NV 0735 1 1 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 276 Las Vegas, NV 1040 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 2130 Las Vegas, NV 1040 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 2273 Las Vegas, NV 1530 1 1 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 3103 Las Vegas, NV 1610 1 1 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 3103 Las Vegas, NV 1845 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 2189 Oakland, CA 0625 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 2189 Oakland, CA 0640 1 1 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 2189 Oakland, CA 0650 1 1 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 1177 Oakland, CA 1705 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 1177 Oakland, CA 1725 1 1 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 1177 Oakland, CA 1735 1 1 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 1325 Phoenix, AZ 0550 1 1 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 2191 Phoenix, AZ 0720 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 1718 Phoenix, AZ 1115 1 1 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 1325 Phoenix, AZ 1335 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 1676 Sacramento, CA 1235 1 1 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 2817 Sacramento, CA 1350 1 1 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 2817 Sacramento, CA 1515 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Southwest Airlines WN 2817 Sacramento, CA 1520 1
Southwest Airlines WN 2817 Sacramento, CA 1530 1 1
Sun Country Inc SY 618 Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN 1315 1 1
Sun Country Inc SY 616 Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN 1345 1
Sun Country Inc SY 616 Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN 1415 1 1 1 1
Sun Country Inc SY 618 Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN 1630 1
Sun Country Inc SY 618 Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN 1755 1
Sun Country Inc SY 618 Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN 1815 1 1 1 1
Sun Country Inc SY 616 Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN 1825 1 1
Sun Country Inc SY 618 Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN 1825 1 1
Sun Country Inc SY 616 Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN 1830 1 1 1
Sun Country Inc SY 616 Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN 1835 1 1 1
United Airlines UA 2475 Chicago-O'Hare, IL 1110 1 1
United Airlines UA 1413 Chicago-O'Hare, IL 1113 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Airline
Code
Flight
Number
DEP
TIME
DEPARTURES - OCTOBER 2022 TRAVEL DATE
Page 5 of 6 10-2022 - PSP AIRLINE SCHEDULES
AIRLINE DESTINATION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
Sa Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su Mo
United Airlines UA 2441 Denver, CO 0533 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
United Airlines UA 2441 Denver, CO 0540 1 1
United Airlines UA 4689 Denver, CO 0908 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
United Airlines UA 4689 Denver, CO 0916 1 1
United Airlines UA 587 Denver, CO 1330 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
United Airlines UA 587 Denver, CO 1334 1 1
United Airlines UA 5501 Houston-Intercontinental, TX 0604 1 1
United Airlines UA 5503 Houston-Intercontinental, TX 1218 1 1
United Airlines UA 5617 San Francisco, CA 0600 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
United Airlines UA 5997 San Francisco, CA 0600 1
United Airlines UA 5997 San Francisco, CA 0800 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
United Airlines UA 5827 San Francisco, CA 1018 1 1
United Airlines UA 2070 San Francisco, CA 1214 1 1
United Airlines UA 2070 San Francisco, CA 1336 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
United Airlines UA 5509 San Francisco, CA 1548 1 1
United Airlines UA 5509 San Francisco, CA 1615 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
WestJet WS 1469 Calgary, AB, CA 1305 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
WestJet WS 1475 Calgary, AB, CA 1730 1 1
WestJet WS 1723 Vancouver, BC, CA 1145 1 1 1 1
WestJet WS 1723 Vancouver, BC, CA 1310 1 1
WestJet WS 1723 Vancouver, BC, CA 1315 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
WestJet WS 1727 Vancouver, BC, CA 1410 1
WestJet WS 1727 Vancouver, BC, CA 1610 1
Airline
Code
Flight
Number
DEP
TIME
DEPARTURES - OCTOBER 2022 TRAVEL DATE
Page 6 of 6 10-2022 - PSP AIRLINE SCHEDULES
ITEM 14 .A / AC 9 -2 1 -2 2 Page 1 | 1
ITEM 14.A - FUTURE COMMITTEE MEETINGS
Airport Commission Meeting of September 21, 2022
Date Time Committee
October – TBD TBD Budget and Finance Committee
October 19, 2022 4:00 P.M. Noise Committee
October 26, 2022 (Tentative) 11:00 A.M. Operations, Properties and Facilities Committee
December - TBD TBD Budget and Finance Committee
TBD TBD Ad Hoc Landscape Committee
TBD TBD Marketing and Business Development Committee