Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2023-12-20 AIRPORT COMMISSION MEETING AGENDAalmsrin 1� pgs I NTE RN AT 10 N AL A I R PORT AIRPORT COMMISSION MEETING Agenda Item Executive Summary Airport Conference Room, Palm Springs International Airport 3400 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way, Palm Springs, CA 92262 Wednesday, December 20, 2023 - 5:30 P.M. The following agenda items were distributed on the next regular business day after the Airport Commission agenda packet was distributed to the Airport Commission, and at least 24 hours prior to the Airport Commission meeting. AGENDA ITEM 6 — Minutes ATTACHMENT: July 19, 2023 Minutes AGENDA ITEM 7.113 — Master Plan Update ATTACHMENTS: Commission Questions and Answers The slide titled 'Terminal Project Benchmarking NOT apples to apples" has been removed and replaced by the following two slides: 1. Terminal Benchmarking (page 52); and 2. PSP Cost per Gate by Phase (page 53). AGENDA ITEM 11.A—Airline Activity Report November 2023 ATTACHMENT: Airline Activity Report November 2023 AGENDA ITEM 11.B —Airline Activity Report Fiscal Year Comparison ATTACHMENT: Airline Activity Report Fiscal Year Comparison springs palm INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AIRPORT COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA Airport Conference Room, Palm Springs International Airport 3400 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way, Palm Springs, CA 92262 Wednesday, December 20, 2023 - 5:30 P.M. Pursuant to Assembly Bill 361, this meeting may be conducted by teleconference. There will be in -person public access to the meeting location. To submit your public comment to the Airport Commission electronically. Material may be emailed to: Christina. Brown palmspringsca.aov - Transmittal prior to the start of the meeting is required. Any correspondence received during or after the meeting will be distributed to the Airport Commission and retained for the official record. This is a hybrid in -person and virtual meeting. To virtually observe the meeting or to virtually provide public comments, please use the following Zoom link https://us02web.zoom.us/i/86019815290?pwd=ZitOZDllyeGZhNUNEQNkU29nTUdPdz09 or call (669) 900-6833 and enter Meeting ID: 860 1981 5290 - Passcode: 583916 City of Palm Springs: Riverside County: Margaret Park City of Cathedral City: Tony Michaelis City of Palm Desert: Kevin Wiseman Aftab Dada - Chair David Feltman Kevin J. Corcoran Vice Chair J Craig Fong City of Indian Wells: Robert Berriman City of Coachella: Denise Delgado City of Rancho Mirage: Keith Young Vacant Tracy Martin Todd Burke M. Guillermo 5uero City of La Quinta: Kathleen Hughes City of Desert Hot Springs: Jan Pye City of Indio: Rick Wise Daniel Caldwell Dave Banks Palm Springs City Staff Scott C. Stiles Harry Barrett Jr., A.A.E. Jeremy Keating City Manager Airport Executive Director Assistant Airport Director 1. CALL TO ORDER — PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. POSTING OF AGENDA 3. ROLL CALL 4. ACCEPTANCE OF AGENDA 5. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Limited to three minutes on any subject within the purview of the Commission 6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Minutes of the Airport Commission Regular Meeting of July 19, 2023 Airport Commission Meeting Agenda December 20, 2023 — Page 2 7. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS: 7.A Follow-up to Strategic Planning Session Update 7.13 Master Plan Update 7.0 Financial Summary Update 7.13 Marketing Update 7.E Concessions Update 7.F Projects and Airport Capital Improvement Program Update 8. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT 9. COMMISSIONERS REQUESTS AND REPORTS 10. REPORT OF COUNCIL ACTIONS: 10.A Past City Council Actions 10.13 Future City Council Actions 11. RECEIVE AND FILE: 11.A Airline Activity Report November 2023 11.13 Airline Activity Report Fiscal Year Comparison 12. COMMITTEES: 12.A Future Committee Meetings 12.13 Updated Committee's Roster ADJOURNMENT: The Airport Commission will adjourn to a Regular Meeting on January 17, 2024, at 5:30 P.M. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING I, Harry Barrett, Jr., Airport Executive Director, City of Palm Springs, California, hereby certify this agenda was posted on December 14, 2023, in accordance with established policies and procedures. PUBLIC NOTICES Pursuant to G.C. Section 54957.5(b)(2) the designated office for inspection of records in connection with the meeting is the Office of the City Clerk, City Hall, 3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way. Complete Agenda Packets are available for public inspection at: City Hall Office of the City Clerk. Agenda and staff reports are available on the City's website www.palmspringsca.gov. If you would like additional information on any item appearing on this agenda, please contact the Office of the City Clerk at (760) 323-8204. It is the intention of the City of Palm Springs to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in all respects. If, as an attendee or a participant at this meeting, or in meetings on a regular basis, you will need special assistance beyond what is normally provided, the City will attempt to accommodate you in every reasonable manner. Please contact the Department of,Aviation, (760) 318-3800, at least 48 hours prior to the meeting to inform us of your particular needs and to springs ►�- palm INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AIRPORT COMMISSION ACTION SUMMARY MINUTES OF REGULAR ADJOURNED MEETING Wednesday, July 19, 2023 — 5:30 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Dada called the Airport Commission Meeting to order at 5:30 P.M., and he invited Vice Chairman Corcoran to lead the Pledge of Allegiance. The meeting was held in -person and via videoconference. 2. POSTING OF THE AGENDA: Posted on July 13, 2023. 3. ROLL CALL: Commissioners Present: Gerald Adams Palm Springs) Kathleen Hughes La Quinta Robert Berriman Indian Wells Scott G. Miller Palm Springs) Todd Burke Palm Springs) Tony Michaelis Cathedral City) Daniel Caldwell Palm Springs) Margaret Park Riverside Count Kevin Corcoran Palm Springs) - Vice Chair Jan P e Desert Hot Springs) Aftab Dada Palm S rings) - Chair Rick Wise(City of India Denise Delgado Coachella Kevin Wiseman Palm Desert David Feltman Palm Springs) Keith Young Rancho Mirage) J Craig Fong Palm Springs) Commissioners Absent: M Guillermo Suero (Palm Springs) Staff Present: Harry Barrett, Jr., Airport Executive Director Jeremy Keating, Assistant Airport Director Daniel Meier, Deputy Director of Aviation, Marketing and Air Service Victoria Carpenter, Airport Administration Manager Brenda Pree, City Clerk Geremy Holm, City Attorney Christina Brown, Executive Program Administrator 4. NOMINATION AND ELECTION OF OFFICERS: City Clerk Pree explained the nomination and election process. Page 1 of 8 ITEM 6 Palm Springs Airport Commission Action Summary Minutes of Regular Adjourned Meeting July 19, 2023 Commissioner Adams nominated Chairman Dada to be re-elected as Chairman. There were no other nominees submitted by the Commission, and Ms. Pree announced the re-election of Chairman Dada. Commissioner Wiseman nominated Vice Chairman Corcoran to be re-elected as Vice Chairman. There were no other nominees submitted by the Commission, and Ms. Pree announced the re-election of Vice Chairman Corcoran. 6. ACCEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA: ACTION: Accept the Agenda as presented. Moved by Commissioner Young, seconded by Commissioner Wise, and unanimously approved noting the absence of Commissioner Suero. 6. PUBLIC COMMENTS: None 7. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: ACTION: Approve the minutes of the Airport Commission Meeting of March 15, 2023. Moved by Commissioner Burke, seconded by Vice Chairman Corcoran and approved by the following roll call vote 12 Yes; 4 Abstain; and noting that Commissioner Delgado was inadvertently not included in the roll call vote and with the absence of Commissioner Suero. 8. INTRODUCTIONS AND PRESENTATIONS: &A Airport Commissioner Daniel Caldwell (Palm Springs) Chairman Dada introduced newly appointed Airport Commissioner Daniel Caldwell (Palm Springs). Commissioner Caldwell said that he and his wife have been residents of Palm Springs for approximately 11 years, and he is a structured settlement specialist. Commissioner Caldwell said that he believed that the Airport was on to something big, and he was excited to be serving on the Commission. 83 Airport Commissioner J Craig Fong (Palm Springs) Chairman Dada introduced newly appointed Airport Commissioner J Craig Fong (Palm Springs). Commissioner Fong said that he was a semi -retired immigration lawyer and that he had been in his profession for approximately 40 years. Commissioner Fong said that he was looking forward to expanding the Airport's international reach and improving the Airport's baggage handling system. He said that it was important to him to make sure that the Airport is being responsive to the needs of the passengers and the airlines, and Commissioner Fong said that he would like to see if there could be a way to even out the number of flights during the off-season. Page 2 of 8 Palm Springs Airport Commission Action Summary Minutes of Regular Adjourned Meeting July 19, 2023 8.0 Airport Commissioner Denise Delgado (Coachella) Chairman Dada introduced newly appointed Airport Commissioner Denise Delgado (Coachella). Commissioner Delgado noted that she is a City of Coachella Councilwoman that was elected in 2020, and she is a teacher. Commissioner Delgado said that she was proud to be serving on the Commission. 8.D Airport Commissioner Robert Berriman (Indian Wells) Chairman Dada introduced newly appointed Airport Commissioner Robert Berriman (Indian Wells). Commissioner Berriman noted that he had previously served two terms on the Airport Commission and that he had served on the Business Development and Operations, Properties and Facilities Committees. He said that he was fully retired, a volunteer with the Friends of the Desert Mountains, his background was primarily law enforcement with the California Highway Patrol Air Operations Unit, and he is a pilot. Commissioner Berriman said that he truly loves the Airport. 8.E Airport Commissioner Margaret Park (Riverside County) Chairman Dada introduced newly appointed Airport Commissioner Margaret Park (Riverside County). Commissioner Park said that she is the chief planning officer for the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians in Palm Springs, she has had the privilege of working for the tribal government since she was 21 years old, and she said that she is serving on the Commission because the Airport is located within the Agua Caliente reservation. 9. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS: 9.A Operations, Properties and Facilities Committee Update Committee Chairman Feltman said that an update had been provided at the previous Airport Commission meeting and that he had no further updates to provide to the Commission. 9.13 Ad Hoc Design Review Committee Update Committee Chairman Corcoran outlined the responsibilities of the Ad Hoc Design Review Committee for the new Commissioners, and he reported that Paradies had notified the Committee that the original vision for the projection system that would project local events on to the ceiling of the Cactus to Clouds Bar that was be developed in the Bono Concourse was not going to be possible because Paradies had determined that the projections would not be visible during the daylight hours. He said that the designers presented an alternative design that added television monitors to the posts of the bar to promote local events. Page 3 of 8 Palm Springs Airport Commission Action Summary Minutes of Regular Adjourned Meeting July 19, 2023 Committee Chairman Corcoran asked Airport Administration Manager Carpenter if the concession projects were on schedule. Ms. Carpenter reported that there had been some slight delays that were due to building permit delays, and she said that the Airport Planner was aggressively working with City staff to get the building permits processed as quickly as possible. 9.0 Marketing and Business Development Committee Update Committee Chairman Burke reported that the Committee had met on July 12th, and he said that Deputy Director of Aviation, Marketing and Air Service Meier had provide updates on the Airport's new branding, customer experience, and advertising. He said that Mr. Meier had reported to the Committee that Phase 1 of the Airport's new branding rollout had stated on July 10th which focused on the new look and feel of the Airport's website, social media, advertising, Navigator uniforms, in terminal signage, media backdrop, and podium sign. Committee Chairman Burke said that Mr. Meier had reviewed several exciting customer experience projects that staff was exploring which included a Dementia Friendly certification, an online Lost and Found Program, and a Ship to Home Program to help passengers ship home prohibited TSA items. He also said that there were several projects that were being rolled out such as Good Maps which is designed to assist visually impaired customers, and a therapy dog program to help reduce customer anxiety. Committee Chairman Burke said that Mr. Meier had reported that the Airport's advertising contractor Fuse had presented some significant revenue opportunities, and he said that the Committee was pleased with Fuse's performance. Vice Chairman Corcoran referred to the Fuse contract, and he asked if there had been any changes made to the technology or equipment being used for advertising. Committee Chairman Burke said that he would defer the question to Mr. Meier. Commissioner Fong asked for information on the different phases of the Airport's branding roll out. Committee Chairman Burke said that he believed that Mr. Meier would be providing information on the phases in the Marketing Update. 9.D Marketing and Air Service Update Deputy Director of Aviation, Marketing and Air Service Meier presented the July 2023 Marketing and Air Service update. Commissioner Fong inquired about the branding phases. Mr. Meier explained that there was a significant number of steps in the branding phases and that most importantly anything that has the old logo would need to be updated with the new logo. Vice Chairman Corcoran referred to the Fuse contract, and he asked if Fuse would be doing anything new with the advertising technology or equipment. Mr. Meier said that Lamar had removed the digital static screens in the baggage claim area and that Fuse Page 4 of 8 Palm Springs Airport Commission Action Summary Minutes of Regular Adjourned Meeting July 19, 2023 would be placing new digital screens in the baggage claim area, and he said that the majority of the static screens throughout the Airport would be replaced with the digital screens which would allow for the advertising to be changed more quickly. Mr. Meier noted that the static screens that were in the courtyard had been damaged by the heat and that Fuse was looking into retrofitting those screens. 9.E Financial Summary Update Airport Administration Manager Carpenter provided an overview of the financial summary ending on June 30, 2023. Commissioner Caldwell inquired about the fiscal year period. Ms. Carpenter explained that the fiscal year was from July 1, 2022 to June 30, 2023. Commissioner Wise suggested that Ms. Carpenter explain to the new Commissioners how some of the funds can only be used for certain projects. Ms. Carpenter explained that Fund 405 could be used for the consolidated rental car facility, and the PFC funds could be used for FAA approved projects. Chairman Dada thanked Ms. Carpenter for sharing the investment policy with the Commission, and he asked about the allowable length of time for an investment. Ms. Carpenter said that she would need to provide that information at a future Commission meeting. Chairman Dada asked if the City would retain the interest income or if the Airport would receive the interest income. Ms. Carpenter said that the Airport would receive the interest income. Chairman Dada inquired about what the interest income could be used for. Ms. Carpenter said that the interest income would go into the Operations and Maintenance revenue account. 9.F Concessions Update Airport Assistant Director Keating reported that both Paradies and The Marshall Retail Group (MRG) continue to be responsive to staffs requests and that the Airport staff holds weekly meetings with Paradies and MRG. He said that staff had received 20 separate design packages which were being reviewed by staff. Mr. Keating reviewed the schedule for the concession projected opening dates. Commissioner Wiseman requested that the original project completion dates be provided in the schedule so that the Commission can see the schedule changes. 9.G Projects and Airport Capital Improvement Program Update Airport Executive Director Barrett noted that the update had been provided in the agenda packet, and he reported that staff would be submitting a staff report to the City Council for the approval of a construction manager at risk agreement with Skansa USA Building Inc. for the expansion of the baggage claim. Mr. Barrett explained that in February 2023, the Airport had been awarded a $5.7 million competitive FAA grant for the renovation of the baggage claim, and staff learned in May that the Airport had a July 31st deadline to have the construction management agreement in place. Page 5 of 8 Palm Springs Airport Commission Action Summary Minutes of Regular Adjourned Meeting July 19, 2023 10.EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT: Airport Executive Director Barrett reported that in the adopted budget for fiscal years 2023-24 and 2024-25, the Airport was authorized 49 additional full time employee positions, and approximately half of the employees would be hired in fiscal year 2023- 24 and the other half in 2024-25. Mr. Barrett recognized that there had been concerns about the space planning and onboarding challenges, and he said that staff had been able to solve the space planning by identifying additional office space and by using creative thinking to better utilize the space that is currently being used. Mr. Barrett said that a Human Resources Specialist was hired to report to the Airport exclusively to facilitate the Airport's recruitments, and the Human Resources Department would be contracting with a consulting firm that would be working on recruitments with an emphasis on Airport recruitments. He said that the Airport was focused on hiring staff for capital development positions, Operations, three new Fire Captains, and an Accountant. Mr. Barrett reported that the Airport has an opportunity to potentially have a closer partnership with a community stakeholder through a naming sponsorship of the Reginal Jet (RJ) Concourse which would be a revenue generating agreement that would involve some minor signage as well as some advertising on the boarding bridges. Deputy Director of Aviation, Marketing and Air Service Meier provided an example of the placement of the advertising on a jet bridge, and the naming sponsorship placement on the outside wall of the RJ entrance, and on the inside wall of the RJ. Mr. Meier noted that advertising wasn't typically approved by the Commission and that due to the size of the projects, staff felt it would be important to get the Commission's feedback. Vice Chairman Corcoran asked how much the Airport would be getting for the sponsorship. Mr. Meier said that the details were still being worked out, and he said that it would be over a million dollars. Commissioner Wise inquired about the contract term. Mr. Meier said that the contract term was also being worked out and that it would be a multi -year contract. Commissioner Young asked if the staff had any concerns about the partnership or reputational risk. Mr. Barrett said that staff did not have any concerns about reputational risk, and he said that staffs main concern was that the partnership would highlight the benefits of the community while ensuring it was also respectful to the community, Airport Commission, and the City Council. Vice Chairman Corcoran asked how the staff would be sharing the sponsorship updates with the Commission, and when would the information be shared with the community. Mr. Barrett said that there needed to be further discussions with the community partner and that staff could provide an update to the full Commission or the Marketing Committee, and once approved, a public announcement could be made. Vice Chairman Corcoran asked if the revenue would be added to the advertising budget. Airport Administration Manager Carpenter said that the revenue would go into the Operations and Maintenance revenue account. Page 6 of 8 Palm Springs Airport Commission Action Summary Minutes of Regular Adjourned Meeting July 19, 2023 Commissioner Miller inquired about other Airports that offer this type of sponsorship opportunity. Mr. Meier said that to his knowledge, PSP would be the first to offer naming rights. Commissioner Miller voiced his concern about the Airport tying itself to the organization that has the naming rights, and the Airport running the risk of that organization, outside of the scope of any control the Airport has of that organization, doing something that could make the Airport look bad. Commissioner Miller suggested that the Airport proceed with caution, and he said that the Airport's reputation is invaluable, and money may not be the best reason to proceed with the sponsorship. Mr. Meier said that there would be a clause in the agreement that would allow the Airport to cancel the contract. Executive Program Administrator Brown said that Commissioner Feltman could ask his question and then the Commission would need to move forward with the agenda and that the item could be brought back as a Discussion and Action Item for a future Commission meeting. Commissioner Feltman said that he felt that there should be a vetting process that would include members of the Commission who have deep ties to the community in addition to the Airport staff, and it would concern him if it were to come to the Commission as an announcement. He also questioned why the sponsorship would be put out for bid, he voiced his concern about it appearing to be an inside deal, and he noted that the Airport is a public entity. Mr. Barrett clarified that staff would be bringing this item back to the Commission to get the Commission's feedback. Vice Chairman Corcoran asked staff to also provide an analysis of the rationale behind the amount of the sponsorship. Commissioner Miller asked if staff had informally spoken to any of the City Councilmembers about the sponsorship. Mr. Barrett said that he had spoken to the City Manager about the sponsorship opportunity, and the City Manager had notified the City Council about the sponsorship opportunity. Commissioner Fong asked if the Commission could review the sponsorship agreement. Mr. Barrett said that he would need to run the request by the City Attorney. City Attorney Holm said that the agreement would be vetted by a City Attorney before it would be presented to the Commission or the City Council. 11.COMMISSIONERS REQUESTS AND REPORTS: Commissioner Adams shared information with the Commission about other Airport's choosing to have silent operations which involves the airport eliminating all overheard speaker announcements to reduce ambient noise, and technology is used to send announcements out electronically. 12.REPORT OF CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS: 12.A. Past City Council Actions 12.B. Future City Council Actions Page 7 of 8 Palm Springs Airport Commission Action Summary Minutes of Regular Adjourned Meeting July 19, 2023 13.RECEIVE AND FILE: 13.A Airlines Activity Report May 2023 13.B Airline Activity Report Fiscal Year Comparison 14. COMMITTEES: 14.A Future Committee Meetings Executive Program Administrator Brown announced that an Ad Hoc Design Review Committee meeting had been scheduled for Wednesday, July 26th at 4:30 p.m. ADJOURNMENT: The Airport Commission adjourned at 6:40 P.M. to a Regular Meeting on September 20, 2023, at 5:30 P.M. Christina Brown Executive Program Administrator Page 8 of 8 palm springs I NTER N AT IONAL A IRPO RT �• , palm springs INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Cost Per E Passenger airline aeronautical revenue 10,00 8,00 6.00 4,99 4.00 200 1, nplaned Passenger - 2022 6.10 6.68 6.69 6,99 ROC TUS PSP SAV ALB # Curren[ CPE Source: Federal Aviation Administration Certification Activity Tracking Form 127 9.18 9.18 8.08 11.71 LIH OSM TUL LGB PEA palm springs WINTERNATIONAL AIPPOPT Aircraft operations for PSP totaled 63,141 Aircraft Operations - 2022 350,000 300,000 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 63,141 68,198 53,726 50,000 `a AiB PSP Ds Source: Federal Aviation Administration Certification Activity Tracking Form 127 112, 75z 81,952 87,757 ROC TUL UH 137,373 116,420 SAV TUS 330,84D We Baggage Handling System Fees Fiscal year 2023-24 projected operational costs. Signatory - average fee per enplaned passenger Non -Signatory -- average fee per enplaned passenger $897,000 $0.52 $0.65 Capital Improvement Projects Locatio n Budget Funding Sourc t Taxiway "W" and "A1" Rehabilitation Project will design the asphalt based on the needs of Airside 630,000 Airport the airfield 2 Wildlife Hazard Management Assessment Project will conduct a wildlife hazard study of the Airside 140,000 Airport airfield Project will assess the hot spots on the airfield to 3 Airfield Hot Spots Study improve safety on the airfield and mace a Airside 200,000 Airport recommendation to mitigate. Landsid 4 Master Plan Project will conduct a full scale master plan of the e/Airsid 2275,816 Airport landside, airside and terminal e/Termi nal Project will design and construct the common use at 5 Terminal Optimization (Common Use) the gates to allow the airport, airlines and ground Termina 1,805,000 handling agents to support the optimization of I passenger processes using shared technologies. Subtotal Fiscal Year 2022-23 Projects 5,050,816 Airport 571,158 58,842 Q4-2024 126,924 13,076 Q1-2025 181,320 18,680 Q4-2024 2,108,584 217,231 Q1-2025 1,805,000 Q4-2024 2,987,986 2,112,829 Capital Improvement Projects Project will improve safety by allowing 6 Consolidated Rental Car Facility (Design) workers to easily reach and maneuver Landside 2,500,000 CFC 2,500,000 Q4-2026 heavy objects. Project will procure equipment, 7 Parking Revenue System software and wayfinding to improve Landside 500,000 Airport 500,000 Q4-2024 the public parking system. The existing system has reached its useful life. Lot A, Economy Lot Parking, Employee Lot (W of El Project will rehabilitate 82,720 square 8 Cielo) - (Design) feet of raw land into an employee Landside 2,400,000 Airport - 2,400,000 - Q4-2025 parking lot, west of El Cielo. Electric Charging Station Infrastructure - Chargers 9 Project will procure 80 electric chargers "B". Landside 300,000 Airport 271,980 - Q42D24 acquisition to be installed in public parking lot ACIP 28020 Project will procure Zero Emissions 10 Procure two Zero Emissions Buses Vehicles (ZEV) to provide transportation Landside 2,000,000 Airport 5,892,900 607,100 - Q4 - 2024 between the terminals and the public VALE/ZEV Grant parking. Capital Improvement Projects Project will replace existing and 11 Wi-Fi install additional access points Terminal Airport - around the airport to improve 500,000 350,000 connectivity Restroom Capacity & ADA Renovations Project will rehabilitate ten restrooms Airport 12 (Construct) and convert them into gender neutralTerminal10,000,000 BIL-ATPGrant 9,500,000 500,000 bathrooms. Outbound Baggage Handing System Terminal Project will expand existing terminal Airport 13 Expansion & Passenger Screening Facility to incorporate the newly designed Terminal 13,560,000 Expansion (Design) baggage handling system. Z0.000,000 ACID 14 Arrivals Baggage Claim Expansion (Design & Project will procure a consultant to design the baggage claim to add Terminal Airport Construct -CMAR) additional capacity to the terminal. 6A00,000 BiL-ATPGrant 5,700,000 300,000 .... ......... Project will remove and replace Carpet Replacement - Main terminal lobby and 15,110 square feet of carpet in the 15 security check point main center terminal and security Terminal 400,000 Airport 150,000 checkpoint. Q3-2024 Q3-2025 - - Q3-2026 Q4-2025 Q4-2024 a s rin s ► palm p g INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Terminal Area Alternatives DECEMBER 24, 2023 � springs ► palm I N T E RNATION AL A I R PORT Advantages of Alternative lA ■ Significantly lower total and Phase 1 ROM costs and likely lower costs to be passed along to airlines. ■ Maintains existing character of PSP by preserving major elements including the Wexler headhouse, the Bono concourse, the fountain, the Tahquitz Canyon Way connection, the outdoor courtyard, the mountain view corridors and the minimal walk distances. • Conveniently locates CONRAC immediately adjacent to the baggage claim. • Conveniently locates FIS near the existing baggage claim. ■ Eases construction phasing with multiple and entirely separate and modern concourses. • Estimated timeframe from end of Master Plan to ribbon cutting is 3.5 to 5 years. • Provides PSP opportunities for stopping points during construction of the four program phases in the event of an economic downtown or unforeseen demand reduction. � palm p gs rin s ► INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Disadvantages of Alternative 1A ■ Long term walking distance increases for south concours that would likely require moving walkways. ■ Requires significant renovation of existing spaces including Wexler headhouse and Bono concourse and associated energy efficiently impacts. • Operational challenges during construction include likely having to shuttle rental car passengers. � palm p Js rin s ► INTERNATIONAL. AIRPORT Advantages of Alternative 3 ■ Creates brand new terminal and vehicle parking facilities. ■ New terminal systems would likely be more energy efficient and reduce annual operations and maintenance costs. ■ Minimizes terminal phasing disruptions to existing operations during construction. ■ Provides a larger landside area for the CONRAC. ■ Maintains historic Wexler terminal and allows the community to determine a future non -terminal related use for this important facility. Master Plan Alternatives 1A & 3 — Commissioner and VGPS Comments & Questions Rick Wise Alternative 1A Pros Alternative 3 Pros Comments • Phase 1 faster • Airport staff are in favor It would be interesting to hear what Hospitality has to say about the two • Keeps Wexler Bldg. part of of this plan. alternatives. We need to better understand why passengers grade PSP so airport operations. • More modern high. It's not the waiting on the tarmac for a gate, it's not the very long wait • Keeps Courtyard accessible • More efficient for baggage, it's not the long lines to check -in or get a rental car. It's the to passengers. • Less impact on customers uniqueness of getting off a plane and immediately getting immersed in the • Less expense per gate during Phase 1 midcentury uniqueness of Palm Springs. The outside courtyard, the • Keeps mid-century beautiful Wexler Building. As a Commission and then ultimately the City uniqueness. Council, we need to decide what PSP will be in the future. Do we keep that • Paster accommodations for uniqueness or do we become a modern airport like so many others in the international travel country. • Greater use of $35M new baggage system Alternative 1A Con Alternative 3 Cons • No plan for Rental Cars • Loss of Courtyard for during Phase 1 passengers • Loss of functioning Wexler Bldg. • Loss of 3 -4 gates in R1 Terminal for 5-6 years. Page 1 Revised: 12/14/2023 Master Plan Alternatives 1A & 3 — Commissioner and VGPS Comments & Questions Tony Michaelis Questions/Comments: I believe Airport management and the Consultant should weigh in on which alternative they recommend and why. They are the experts and I see no reason not to share their opinion and still remain objective moving forward. Is there any reason to believe that the airlines would favor one alternative over the other? Since cost is likely a major consideration, I assume Alternative 1a would be the preferred option based on initial comments by one airline. Cost: How will the project be funded? Does Alternative 3's higher cost make it more difficult to fund? I'm particularly concerned that Alternative 3 requires the Airport to commit to the overall program with a significant investment in Phase 1 without any real flexibility to adjust for unforeseen circumstances. Disruptions: Which alternative is least disruptive? Beyond car rental offsite requirement what is the likely impact on passenger experience for Alternative la? It would seem that rental car shuttling is preferable over passenger parking shuttling which would be needed in Alternative 3. Can Airport management comment or elaborate on whether Alternative 1a disruptions would dramatically impact passenger or airline experience. Delays: Which Alternative requires the need to use non -airport owned property? If property acquisition is needed, what is likelihood of cost or acquisition issues delaying the project. Long term operating impact: Alternative 3 is identified to have energy efficiencies, reduction in annual operations and maintenance costs. Is there any information on the savings or lack thereof from choosing Alternative la. Alternative 1A offers lower cost, quicker build, the ability to stop construction for unforeseen events, continued active airport use of Wexler building and avoids wasting the money used for the baggage claim renovation. Disruption impact is major outstanding question. Robert Berriman Questions/Comments: Mead & Hunt Issues: Only the outer exterior views were presented, nothing indicated where the Checkpoint(s) Checked Bag Screening or Baggage Claim(s) would be for either plan. ALTERNATIVE lA EXPAND AND RENOVATE (Hybrid): • Keep the Wexler Headhouse as a terminal. Do not remove the Regional and Bono Terminals when an extended new lA Concourse could allow for taxi room around the existing Regional Terminal. This would increase the gate numbers and keep the airport operational during construction of the new south terminal gate expansion/extension. • By keeping the Wexler Headhouse, the then to be renovated TSA Baggage system is already in place. • Con: The CONRAC is very distant to passengers arriving or departing from the farthest new gates. Possibly move the CONRAC to the Plan 3 space designation. Airport Issues: Are there Contractual lease issues with Signature Air relocation? Many airports have multiple TSA Checkpoints, this gives seasonal flexibility to open or close areas as demand requires. TSA staffing is generally not based on the number of checkpoints but rather on passenger load. Will there be difficulty finding concessionaires for a large #3 expansion? ALTERNATIVE 3 REPLACE: • Potentially move Signature Air into the Wexler Building • Large Parking Lot A is a considerable distance from passengers arriving or departing the new terminal. • Can the proposed new parking area actually be purchased? • Pro: the CONRAC is more centrally located to all passengers. Page 2 Revised: 12/14/2023 Master Plan Alternatives lA & 3 — Commissioner and VGPS Comments & Questions Jan Pye Questions/Comments: 1. First, take into consideration the public's viewpoint: Alternative 3 a. Wexler Building is important and should be saved ... staff have some options. b. Alter 3 will benefit the public and operations ... and reduce current operations. Alternative 1A a. Quickest alternative and cheapest ...? At what future cost b. Keeps Wexler as the focal point of Bono. c. Doesn't allow for all departing/arriving pax to journey through the courtyard. These observations lean more toward Alternative 3. 2. Terminal Area Alternatives from Commission meeting Dec 6 Advantages of Alternative 1A ... agree with all. Disadvantages of Alternative 1A: "Long term walking distance increases for south concours that would likely require moving walk ways". With our aging population, is this wise? For others, not residents here, are we being customer -friendly? It is the same for "Operational challenges during construction include likely having to shuttle rental car passengers." Advantages of Alternative 3 - I agree strongly with these advantages. Disadvantages of Alternative 3 All of the disadvantages are reasonably dependent on the projection of a 5-year plan. Does the Commission or even the Council want to commit to the cheaper cost? This airport is special concerning tourism, architecture, scenery, etc. 3. For Efficiency: The Council should consider the Airport staff concerning decentralizing its weakness in Human Resources, Information Technology, Procurement, and permitting. This may eliminate some of the goal hindrances from the Master Plan to the ribbon cutting. Page 3 Revised: 12/14/2023 Master Plan Alternatives 1A & 3 — Commissioner and VGPS Comments & Questions Keith Young Questions/Comments • There are two estimates described for the Alternative 1A schedule: 3.5 years and 3.5 to 5 years. Given that the 3.5 year estimate was discussed as a meaningful advantage to Alternative 1A, please clarify this difference (particularly since 5 years is also listed in the range for Alternative 3). • Are construction delays more likely with a renovation (e.g. unexpected conditions, historical limitations, or hazards during renovation) than with a new build? If so, should this impact how we understand the construction time estimates? • Assuming that P5P remains a popular destination, are the variable costs passed along to airlines likely to impact the frequency of service they choose to offer as the new facility is opened? • Please provide in the chart, if possible, the number of gate positions offering jet bridges at each phase (or confirm that all gate positions listed in the summary will have jet bridges). Please confirm that we should think of gates with jet bridges as offering significantly more turnaround opportunities (and thus greater passenger capacity) than gates without bridges. • Are there any of the renovated elements of Alternative 1A that would likely require additional upgrades within 15-25 years? If so, is there any meaningful way to estimate these costs? • Would the larger landslide area for the CONRAC in Alternative 3 also potentially yield additional parking spaces that would not be possible in the CONRAC of 1A? • Are the "operational challenges" of shuttling rental car passengers (1A) or public parking passengers (3) essentially comparable, but affecting different passenger types? • Will the benefits of an improved concourse experience for some travelers in Phase 1 of Alternative 1A outweigh the inconveniences of displaced rental car lots, etc. that will be experienced by all travelers requiring those services? We obviously had some discussion at the end about a modified Alternative 3 that somehow incorporated Wexler, The following question refers to that, in the event that our discussion revisits that idea: Is there a way that the Wexler Building could house gate car passengers (1A) or public parking passengers (3) essentially comparable, but affecting different passenger types? Page 4 Revised: 12/14/2023 Master Plan Alternatives 1A & 3 — Commissioner and VGPS Comments & Questions David Feltman Comments: I continue to favor plan 1 A. I do not agree that an "advantage" of Alternative 3 is that it "Maintains historic Wexler terminal and allows the community to determine a future non -terminal related use for this important facility." That is a wildly inaccurate statement and is essentially "spin". There is no future use for that building in this plan so characterizing it as maintaining the building is inaccurate. Furthermore, the community is now in the middle of the re -use of another facility that is somewhere in the neighborhood of $15-$20 million over budget and the taxpayers are being asked to fund that overrun. The community is not suited to decide or implement the reuse of this building. Therefore, this plan creates a White Elephant out of a historic building in the City so, therefore, it is not "maintained." J Craig Fong Comments: Without yet committing myself to one Alternative or the other, I note the following: Alternative 1A This alternative provides PSP with needed additional gates more quickly than Alternative 3. It is not dependent on acquisition or seizure of additional land, which could be expensive and problematic. I am particularly cognizant that Alternative 1A provides PSP with faster access to full international capability, tries to meet community needs more quickly, and has relatively less construction -related disruption than Alternative 3. 1 do not view the long walking distances as a negative, if there is a moving walkway; indeed, a moving walkway would be an advantage, given the needs of many area residents. I am, however, somewhat unhappy at the large footprint of the CONRAC. All of this at a cost that is lower than that for Alternative 3. Alternative 3 This alternative provides the Coachella Valley with a virtually new airport, to carry it through the 21st century. Such an airport would meet the needs of a community that is unrecognizably different from when PSP was first built. A new terminal would be an engine for tourism growth and regional development for the rest of the century. Construction would provide employment throughout the region. The Wexler facility was designed for a markedly different age of air transport, and its use in Alternative 1A saddles airport management with a building that is, even today, no longer fit for purpose, requiring myriad workarounds detrimental to efficiency. Instead, the iconic Wexler structure could be repurposed as a community landmark, perhaps in partnership with the USO, as a display space for the Palm Springs Air Museum and the Agua Caliente Cultural Museum, and as a community conference space. Scott White - Visit Greater Palm Springs Comments: Alternative 1A - In this alternative, the Airport will lose three (3) gates in Phase 2 of construction. Page 5 Revised: 12/14/2023 TERMINAL AREA ALTERNATIVES COMMISSION QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS The following questions were submitted by Airport Commissions members to Airport Staff and the Master Plan Consultant Team. Written answers are provided, and further discussion and clarification can be provided at the Commission Meeting on December 20th 1) As a Commission and then ultimately the City Council, we need to decide what PSP will be in the future. Do we keep that uniqueness or do we become a modern airport like so many others in the country. ■ The is a question that that the Commission and Council should ultimately answer. However, the Master Plan Team has worked to incorporate the PSP uniqueness in both Alternatives 1A and 3 and many of these unique elements can be incorporate into the terminal design. 2) Is there any reason to believe that the airlines would favor one alternative over the other? Since cost is likely a major consideration, I assume Alternative la would be the preferred option based on initial comments by one airline. ■ Yes, Airport Staff and the Master Plan Team meet with the AAAC on December 12 and the airlines unanimously expressed support for Alternative 1A. 3) How will the project be funded? Does Alternative 3's higher cost make it more difficult to fund? I'm particularly concerned that Alternative 3 requires the Airport to commit to the overall program with a significant investment in Phase 1 without any real flexibility to adjust for unforeseen circumstances. ■ A funding plan has not yet been determined. It is a common misconception that airports are funded with taxpayer dollars. Infrastructure projects at airports in the United States are typically funded through the following key mechanisms: federal grants through the FAA's Airport Improvement Program (AIP), the Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) local user fees, airport reserves, general airport revenue bounds, or public private partnerships. ■ Yes, Alternatives 3's higher costs make funding the terminal improvements more challenging. 4) Which alternative is least disruptive? Beyond car rental offsite requirement what is the likely impact on passenger experience for Alternative 1A? It would seem that rental car shuttling is preferable over passenger parking shuttling which would be needed in Alternative 3. Can Airport management comment or elaborate on whether Alternative lA disruptions would dramatically impact passenger or airline experience. ■ Both alternatives are disruptive and each of the four phases in both alternatives have varying descriptions to existing operations. For example, in Alternative 1A, rental car passenger shuttling would likely be required during CONRAC construction in Phase 1. In Alternative 3, public passenger shuttling would likely be required during CONRAC construction in Phase 1 as the CONRAC is sited in the existing public parking area. ■ Airport staff will comment at the December 20'h Airport Commission meeting. 5) Which Alternative requires the need to use non -airport owned property? If property acquisition is needed, what is likelihood of cost or acquisition issues delaying the project? ■ Both alternatives include a recommendation for airport property acquisition for the purposes of meeting public parking demand. However, both alternatives could likely move forward without the acquisition. palm springs MASTER PLAN �/ INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 1 6) Alternative 3 is identified to have energy efficiencies, reduction in annual operations and maintenance costs. Is there any information on the savings or lack thereof from choosing Alternative 1A? ■ Alternative 1A requires more replacement of existing utilities and building systems. Specific quantified savings on Operations and Maintenance costs depends on the type of system equipment procured which is a design consideration that will be evaluated during architectural design. 7) Disruption impact is major outstanding question. ■ Please see the response to Question number 5. 8) Only the outer exterior views were presented, nothing indicated where the Checkpoint(s) Checked Bag Screening or Baggage Claim(s) would be for either plan. ■ Gensler has developed a rough interior floor plan for both alternative for the purposes of space adjacency and to ensure that the functional components of the terminal in each alternative would fit together. 9) Are there Contractual lease issues with Signature Air relocation? ■ The Airport and Signature do currently have a lease agreement and dependent on timing of the relocation, that lease agreement may need to be revised and renegotiated. 10) Will there be difficulty finding concessionaires for a large #3 expansion? ■ The Airport recently developed a new concessions program and interest from future concessionaires is expected to be high in either alternative concept. 11) Can the proposed new parking area in both alternatives actually be purchased? ■ Both alternatives include a recommendation for airport property acquisition for the purposes of meeting public parking demand. However, both alternatives could likely move forward without the acquisition. 12) All of the disadvantages of Alternative 3 are reasonably dependent on the projection of a 5-year plan. Does the Commission or even the Council want to commit to the cheaper cost? ■ A funding plan has not yet been determined. 13) There are two esMmates described for the Alternative 1A schedule: 3.5 years and 3.5 to 5 years. Given that the 3.5 year esMmate was discussed as a meaningful advantage to Alternative 1A, please clarify this difference (particularly since 5 years is also listed in the range for Alternative 3). ■ There are a number of variables that impact the design/construction timeline. Because less square feet of new terminal facilities are being constructed in 1A vs. 3 in Phase 1, its reasonable to expect that 1A Phase 1 can be completed sooner. The range of timeline for either alternative is likely 4 to 7 years. 14) Are construction delays more likely with a renovation (e.g. unexpected conditions, historical limitations, or hazards during renovation) than with a new build? If so, should this impact how we understand the construction time estimates? palm springs MASTER PLAN �, INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 2 ■ Reconfiguring the Wexler Building to house gates, or more specifically hold room space for walkout gates is possible, but the redundancy of airport systems (i.e. TSA checkpoint, baggage, etc.) is inefficient. 22) 1 continue to favor Alternative IA. I do not agree that an "advantage" of Alternative 3 is that it "Maintains historic Wexler terminal and allows the community to determine a future non -terminal related use for this important facility." That is a wildly inaccurate statement and is essentially "spin". ■ This statement specifically referred to fact that the Wexler building would not be torn down or removed in Alternative 3. 23) Alternative 1A - In this alternative, will the Airport will lose three (3) gates in Phase 2 during construction? ■ Construction of Phase 2 in Alternative 1A is anticipated to be at least 18 months meaning that passengers may have to be bussed to remote aircraft hard stands if gate demand exceeds the number of gates available. 24) Can you provide some benchmarking to other small hub airports who have undertaken similar terminal expansions and any small hub airports that operate two independent terminals? ■ A benchmarking slide has been prepared for the December 201h Commission meeting. There are no small hubs that the Master Plan team is aware of that operate two separate terminals. Z7AM��palm springs MASTER PLAN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 4 Palm SpringsAirport Master Plan Airport Commission Briefing December 20, 2023 !W- W-.A 2Apalm springs INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Mead blunt Alt IA and Alt 3 Phases and Cost Estimates Refined Alternatives 1A and 3 + Alternative 1A — Renovate and Expand Signficant expansion of Wexler building with two new concourse located north and south + Alternative 3 R,-e / New terminal facilities to the south and eventually repurpose the Wexler building r,Anw_ pa 1 m springs AIRPORT MASTER PLAN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT MOMMM Cost Estimates by Phase Alternative Alternative 1A Phase TOTAL Cost Estimate $2,207,886,262 1A - Phase 1 $879,427,910 1A - Phase 2 $1,145,490,054 1A - Phase 3 $93,188,731 1A - Phase 4 $89,779,568 Alternative 3 TOTAL $2,786,979,408 3 - Phase 1 $2,226,513,141 3 - Phase 2 $349,194,794 3 - Phase 3 $95,783,136 3 - Phase 4 $115,488,337 Source: Leyland Saylor ►� palm springs AIRPORT MASTER PLAN ,. INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Mead &-+Iunt Updated Timeline Mead blunt Terminal Project Benchmarking PSP Cost per Gate by Phase Alternative Number 1A Cost of per , Phase Gill Phase 1*** Cost 7 of Program $346,016,000 Cr per Gate $50,000,000 Phase 2 9 $1,145,491,000 $128,000,000 Phase 3 5 $93,189,000 $19,0000`000 Phase 4 5 $89,780,000 $18,000,000 Total Constructed 26 $1,674,474,000 $64,403,000 Gates Notes: *The scope of each phase differs causing a wide range of costs per gate in each phase (i.e. some phases include apron, roadwork, baggage handling systems, etc. while others do not). •'Number of gates constructed in that phase "Cost Estimate does not include CONRAC and contingencies along with the CONRAC Alternative 3 ost per Go te PhaseNumber Gatil Of r of Program Costper Gate Phase 1*** 20 $1,705,102,000 $83,000,000 Phase 2 4 $349,195,000 $88,000,000 Phase 3 4 $95,784,000 $24,000,000 Phase 4 4 $115,489,000 $29,000,000 Total Constructed 32 $2,265,568,000 $70,799,000 Gates Notes: *The scope of each phase differs causing a wide range of costs per gate in each phase (i.e. some phases include apron, roadwork, baggage handling systems, etc. while others do not), "Number of gates constructed in that phase —Cost Estimate does not include CON RAC and cont�ngencnes along with the CONRAC aW- ,,palm springs AIRPORT MASTER PLAN If4TERNATIONAL AIRPORT Mead blunt Feedback and Questions from Airport Commissioners Mead blunt Questions/Discussion -- — —— — — — — —-- Q I A)L Ask Phase ROM Cost Y $900M , I , I I VAC,n `. r LOT A 1 R I 5' A 'SO CtSP `� eocate Ignawre vlatlan,- and rental car parking to accommodate LOfi9 the new CONFLAC. 2. New Central Utility Plant. H I 3. New north concourse with International arrivals capability. 4. New for E! LOT C apron aircraft parking and �a / C, updated taxiway striping.tt7 5- Potential parking lot expansions to z4 Ra accommodate displaced parking from 4/ the proposed GTC, accommodate project' parking demand growth, and provide additional surface parking for rental car vehicles during constructions of the \� CONRAC. LOT G 6. 5-level CONRAC facility with customer service lobby located adjacent to bag claim. 7. GTC flanking central garden at entry. �` \ 2 �P- 4 8. Connector road for commercial access to , the GTC. ` 2 O ' \, 0 9. Potential remain overnight (RON) 0p aircraft parking. Aircraft Parking 23 (25 Narrow Body);..- LOTI , i5l L! J , f J. LOT i f I LOT E t I i .l .' - g.-• �� .— � _ __III' .,-, AUTO PARKING LOT AREA SPACES' A 70,600 SF N/A - e 80,000 SF N/A C 247,000 SF 760 Dom--55,000 SF 172 - E 116,600 SF 356 r F 419A00 SF 1286 } G 66,0065E 204 LEGEND: � LxrsrlNc, srGNal � i rxonrnl n sN�NAI i AIR{RAFT AT GATE AIRCRAFTRON AIRCRAFT MOVEMENT AREA _ FXINTMr AJLrY.NG TO REVAN _ �rt nuuus,E nAlre lNc, UNTP 11 9,11Y L,I AN1 — &WWN6 TRANSPORtArO CfWTER i C(1t.NTYARO I �F SPAN GONRAC C = fUTORE PROPERTY A(-,MISITION fxtw'NI:AIRPORIMt.."Rry I Alternative 1A — Phase 3 Phase ROM cost $loons 3 rf- °----------------------- - - - -__-----------1----- 1 r 'i + V ^ ^♦♦ LOTA J \ n` i�♦� i �\ LOT f( LOT C eo \♦, LOTD �I �P . ♦ �Q a 1. South pier expands to the east. Ap 2. New aircraft parking apron on both sides of the pier. m�- Aircraft Parking Count: 27 J29 Narrow Body) ♦ OTi' LOT G 1000, LOT E jt R A°• `i LEGEND: ' 4 r ExlsTx�cswnAE '1 PRDPasrD srcNAr AUTO PARKING 10`1 ARIA SPACES, A 70,000 SF WA :A 8 WAN 5f WA C 337,0005F 1036 'a D 56,ODDSP 17z E 181,000 SF SS6 IF F 123,0D0 5F 378 G 342,DDo 5F 1052 yffff� AIRCRAFTATGATE 111K-'T RON --y1 AIRCRM T MOVEMEM1 AREA �, FwSnNG RufDrNG ro Rr+�:,iN nEaorlc�:,t PARRIN3 ctwmA UTILITY RJWT L.unc:�Ar.�x - GRMx ND TRANBPORTATOM CENTER COLpTYAFi6' GFEPNSPACE CONRAC C, EU%RE PNLWERf� ACWrSIION Ir C��] ! M 8 fM AIKKMt YH(W j' Alternative 1A — Phase 4 LOT A LOt �L, � ¢ F LOT c 1. 1.4 'N LOT D 1. South pier expands to the east. 2. New aircraft parking apron surrounding the end of the pier. q'r Aircraft Parking Count: 32 (34 Narrow Body) i. Phase ROM Cost = $100M LOT E 01 f } / I LEGEND: lily Ff l ' LOT G �'• � PrtorasEo slcwAl AIR[RIIfT aT GATE - --- AIRCRAFT RON � I AIR(RII1 1 MOVEMENT 6REA ` Ii[nplglf�:l CFNTRµ uY in Fim �UfA.4u+x _ CROUNO TRANSPOR?ATIOII CENTER _ COURT ARD fIRrFNRPA--F CONNAC C;;=� IlSll l`:.: -"i 7YAGOLI51TM �Vil . .ice 4 Alternative 1A "Southwest View" palm spring J AIRPORT MASTER PLAN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Source: Gensler 2023 am= =MW 4 Alternative 3 - Phase 2 ------ Mif Phase ROM Cost = $400M t+++++ Map- 1 -r IT - N-1 OLOT D I. Restoration of the original Wexler Terminal Building for future uses. �11 2. New pavement and striping for triple Group III taxilane. /QD� 3. New pavement for aircraft parking. a� 4. Activate the 4 Pate on the west side of the central pier. S. Potential for remain overnight (RON) aircraft parking. mo- •S Aircraft Parking Count: 22 (24 Narrow Body) LEGEND; % EKMMG SIGNAL /ROPOSEO SIGNAL - +�fAIRCRAFT AT GATE - RAF -- AIRCRAFT MUVEMLNT ARLA I FXIVWV VILDWG TORE"N 1RuaxnlEF ;' PMNiyfj ® CT'NigA. iJi., i'r PI AkT GROW D NkNS"TATlON UNTER CdxtlrARR: 3RFFw9P4f"r - covuc C..� nm1RrG FRS AC1%170N C__:3 EMnNGNWOR7Ml Rtt 4w Operating Revenue Operating Expenditures Surplus / (Deficit) 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 (500,000) (1,000,000) (1,500,000) (2,000,a00) (2,500,000) (3,000,000) CITY OF PALM SPRINGS PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Financial Summary Ending November 30, 2023 9,181,327 1,486,202 16% 1,277,139 16%1 11,780,574 - 0% - 0% (2,599,247) 1,486,202 -57% 1,277,139 -1696 Fund 405 - Customer Facility Charges - Net Balance 12,599,247) a FY 23-24 ■ FY 23-24 i FY 22-23 Revised Budget Actual Actual ITEM 7.0 Page 1 of 10 12/11/2023 CITY OF PALM SPRINGS PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Financial Summary Ending November 30, 2023 Operating Revenue 6,450,776 1,628,058 25% 1,416,237 15% Operating Expenditures 9,072,099 3,485 0% Surplus / (Deficit) (2,621,323) 1,624,573 -62% 1,416,237 15% 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,00u 500,00n (s00,000) (110001aoo( (1,500,0oo) (2,000,000) (2,500,000) (3,000,000) Fund 410 - Passenger Facility Charges - Net Balance (2,621,323) FY 23-24 ■ FY 23-24 ■ FY 22-23 Revised Budget Actual Actual Page 2 of 10 12/11/2023 CITY OF PALM SPRINGS PALM SPRINGS. INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Financial Summary Ending November 30, 2023 Page 3 of 10 12/11/2023 CITY OF PALM SPRINGS PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Financial Summary Ending November 30, 2023 Airline Revenue Landing Fees 5,910,134 1,216,890 21% 765,941 59% Landing Fee Surcharge - (93,778) 0% 462,510 -120% Terminal Airline Space/Joint Use 9,467,216 1,986,394 21% 687,636 189% Gate Per Use Fees 3,470,605 323,416 9% 338,959 -5% Passenger Loading Bridge Fee 1,255,064 220,692 18% - 0% Baggage Handling System Fees 897,000 285,832 32% - 0% Total Airline Revenues 21,000,019 3,939,446 19% 2,255,046 75% Other Revenue CARES Act - - 0% 5,989,698 -100% CRRSAA-Airport 4,783,916 1,408,292 29% - 0% CRRSAA-Concessions 280,390 - 0% - 0% ARPA-Airport 1,481,290 0% 6,020,652 -100% ARPA-Concessions 1,121,560 - 0% - 0% Total Other Revenue 7,667,156 1,408,292 18% 12,010,350 -88% Non -Airline Revenue General Aviation 406,000 66,940 16% 70,424 -5% Non -Aeronautical Ground Rental 457,315 171,984 38% 155,307 11% Aeronautical Ground Rental 1,247,329 512,622 41% 684,872 -25% Parking 6,697,064 2,411,297 36% 2,362,234 2% Ariport Use Permits 53,263 23,865 45% 10,327 131% Non -Airline Terminal Rent Fee 9,998,816 699,732 7% 691,725 1% Rental Car - Overflow Parking 371,809 200 0% 11,030 -98% Advertising 315,951 63,245 20% 121,814 -48% On Airport Rental Car 11,944,780 2,327,703 19% 2,911,763 -20% Commerical Services Fees 1,099,000 222,483 20% 210,783 6% Ground Transportation Fees 1,195,000 361,176 30% 294,346 23% Customs 336,296 49,719 15% 54,057 -8% All Other Revenue 1,301,070 424,330 33% 254,846 67% Total Non -Airline Revenue 35,423,694 7,335,295 21% 7,833,528 -6% Total Operating Revenues 64,090,869 12,683,032 20% 22,098,924 -43% Page 4 of 10 12/11/2023 CITY OF PALM SPRINGS PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Financial Summary Ending November 30, 2023 YTD Actual Revenue 25,000,000 FY 23-24 (Y 22 23 Note: FY22-23 had $12M in revenues from one-time CARES & ARPA grant funds FY 23-24 OPERATING FUND REVENUES BY CATEGORY Total Non - Airline Revenue 58% 0 Cal Airline avenues 31% Other enue L% Page 5 of 10 12/11/2023 CITY OF PALM SPRINGS PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Financial Summary Ending November 30, 2023 Operating Expenditures Airport Administration 8,155,945 1,554,700 19% 1,459,588 94% Airport Information Technology 1,026,206 102,695 10% 16 0% Airport Law Enforcement 3,130,981 896,963 29% 1,193,766 133% Aviation Security 1,936,264 56,676 3% - 0% Airside Operations 5,981,668 1,187,476 20% 106,276 9% Airport Rescue - Fire 4,828,582 982,807 20% 1,410,266 143% Landside Operations 2,217,250 644,894 29% 628,649 97% Grounds Maintenance 691,680 155,666 23% 207,293 133% Terminal Building Operations 8,270,483 1,303,353 16% 2,545,045 195% Passenger Boarding Bridges 120,000 9,931 8% 3,506 35% Bagagge Handling System 897,000 84,529 9% 73,219 87% Control Center Operations 4,169,247 1,213,030 29% 1,337,814 110% U.S. Customs 336,436 69,387 21% 107,518 155% Planning & Projects 723,776 18,538 3% - 0% Airport Pass Thru to Others 1,401,950 1,291,809 92% 0% PERS Cast Recovery 500,000 - 0% 0% Budget Transfer Out 6,983,634 - 0% - 0% Total Operating Expenditures 51,371,103 9,572,453 19% 9,072,957 95% Surplus/ (Deficit) 12,719,766 3,110,579 24% 13,025,967 419% Page 6 of 10 12/11/2023 12,000,000 10,000,000 8,000,000 6,000,000 4,000,000 2,000,000 9,572,453 FY 23-24 CITY OF PALM SPRINGS PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Financial Summary Ending November 30, 2023 YTD Actual Expenditures 18% 9,072,957 I FY 72-23 7,710,243 FY 21-22 238% FY 23-24 OPERATING FUND FY 23-24 OPERATING FUND EXPENDITURES BY DEPARTMENT EXPENDITURES BY CATEGORY Airport Administration 16% Airport Law ' Enforcemen Materials & Control Supplies t Center Operations 13% _Add&; Utilities 7% Terminal Alb Building Airside Operations Operations 14% Grounds 1 Airport 12% Maintenanc Landside Rescue - e Operations Fire 2% 7% 10% Services 18% Salaries & Benefits' 52% Page 7 of 10 12/11/2023 r CITY OF PALM SPRINGS PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Financial Summary Ending November 30, 2023 uptrdUil6' f tCVtIIUC U3,1V1,17U ,JV4,' 04 am -11— Operating Expenditures 78,188,130 4,055,749 5% 2,985,245 36% Surplus / (Deficit) (8,486,335) (3,513,268) 41% (592,902) 493% (1,000,000) (2,000,000) (3,000,000) (4,000,000) (5,000,000) (6,000,000) (7,000,000) (8,000,000) (9,000,000) Fund 416 - Airport Capital Projects - Net Balance (8,486,335) ■ FY 23-24 11 FY 23-24 ■ FY 22-23 Revised Budget Actual Actual Page 8 of 10 12/11/2023 CITY OF PALM SPRINGS PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Financial Summary Ending November 30, 2023 Fund 405 40,118,850 30,710,626 25,794,777 Fund 410 2,895,137 1,825,632 2,330,104 Fund 415 Unrestricted Sub -Total 15,990,359 24,744,431 10,362,750 Fund 416 2,427,453 6,712,551 5,404,035 45,000,000 40,000,000 35,000,000 30,000,000 25,000,000 20,000,000 15,000,000 10,000,000 5,000,000 40,118,850 30,710,626 25,794,777 Cash by Fund 24,744,431 15,990, 359 10,3 62, 750 6,712,551 1,825,632 2.895,137 2,330,104 1,404,035 2,427.453 Fund 405 Fund 410 Fund 415 Unrestricted Sul- Fund 416 ■ FY 23-24 ■ FY 22-23 a FY 21-22 Total Actual Actual Actual Page 9 of 10 12/11/2023 CITY OF PALM SPRINGS PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Financial Summary Ending November 30, 2023 Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES) - Expires - May 10, 2024 11,067,877 11,067,877 Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations (CRRSA)- Airport Operations Expires - April 14, 2025 4,785.805 4,785.805 Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations (CRRSA)- Concessions Expires - May 31, 2025 280,390 280,390 American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (ARPA) - Concession Expires - May 31, 2025 1,121,560 1,121,560 American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (ARPA) - Airport Operations Expires - August 10, 2025 10,791,632 10,791,632 Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL)* Expires - 2027 15 918,762 - Total Grants 43,966,026 28.047,264 Grants - Remaining Balance 18,000,000 $16,000,000 $14, 000,000 $12,000,000 $11,067,877,C $10,791,632.0 $10,000,000 $ 8,000,000 $ 6,000,000 $4, 785, 805.0 $4,000,000 $2,000,000 $2803900 $1,121,560.0 $0 Coronavirus Response Coronavirus American Coronavirus and Relief Response American Rescue Alan Aid, Relief, Supplementa and Relief Rescue Plan Act of 2021 and 1 Suppfementa Act of 2021 (ARPA) - Economic Appropriatio I (ARPA] - Air Security Act ns (CRRSA)- Appropriatio (CARES) - Airport ns {CRRSA)- Concession Operaatiott ns Expires- Expires - Expires- Operations Concessions May 31, 2025 August 10, May 10, 2024 Expires - Expires - 2025 April 14, May 31, 2025 2025 15 918,762 15 918, 762 $15, 918, 762.0 Bipartisan Infrastructur e Law (RIL)* Expires - 2027 1 Grant Awarded by the FAA to the Airport 11,067,877 4,785,805 280,390 1,121,560 10,791,632 15,918,762 ■ Actual Used as of 11/30/23 11,067,877 4,785,805 280,390 1,121,560 10,791,632 - RemainingActualUnused - - - - - 15,918,762 Page 10 of 10 12/11/2023 palm springs INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT ZW-- springs palm INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT RJ Concourse - Local entity has agreed to a 3-year deal to place their name on the Rj Concourse - Agreement includes: - Naming rights to the Rj Concourse - Rj Concourse activation space to include amenities for passengers such as seating and potential charging stations - Other in -terminal advertising PSP Concession Projected Opening Dates 1D 16 Task Task Name Qtr 3, Z023 j Qtr 4, 2023 Qtr 1, 2024 Qtr 2, 2024 Qtr 3, 2024 Qtr 4, 2024 Mode Jun i Jul 1 Au I Se p II Oct � Nov Dec J Jan I Feb I Mar . A r I may Jun I W __Aug.. ,Sep_; Oct _—Nov __Dec: _ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 aF� LAS PALMAS OASIS (TEMP TAKEOVER) UPTOWN ESSENTIALS [TEMP KIOSK] THE PINK DOOR I HEART PSP & VENDING Nine Cities Craft HEY JOSHUA Cactus to Clouds LAS PALMAS OASIS UPTOWN ESSENTIALS El Mirasol & Coachella Valley Coffee INMOTION COACHELLA DUTY FREE CART COURTYARD - COFFEE TRUCK/TRAILER Vino Volo Trio Half Moon Empanadas 9/11 ♦ 9/12 ♦ 1/30 1/30 ♦ 2/2 2/27 ♦ 4/12 ♦ 4/ 16 ♦ 4/16 ♦ 5/10 5/14 ♦ 6/21 ♦ 8/19 9/30 ♦ 9/30 ♦I ITEM 7.E Palm Springs International Airport Wed 12/13/23 PE palm springs ,A INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT A Department of the City of Palm Springs DATE: December 20, 2023 TO: Chairman Dada and Airport Commissioners FROM: Harry Barrett, Jr., Airport Executive Director SUBJECT: Projects and Airport Capital Improvement Update Capital Projects Airport Master Alan (Updated December 11, 2023) Palm Springs International Airport 3400 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way, Suite 1 Palm Springs, CA 92262-6966 flypsp.com T: (760) 31 B-3800 Background: This project is a 30-month comprehensive study to plan and develop capital program requirements thru the year 2045. The study is scoped to be sustainable, and incorporates future goals related to terminal complex, landside access and parking, and airside improvements for future generating aircraft. Status: In process. On September 18th, the Federal Aviation Administration provided an approval of PSP's Aviation Forecasts thru the year 2043. The consultant has produced Initial Alternatives that were presented to the City Council on September 14th and in a public open house on September 19th that was attended by approximately 160 people. Mead & Hunt has reviewed all comments and incorporated them into a refined Terminal Alternatives document which was presented to the Master Plan Working Group on October 12th. Airport staff and the consultant presented the revised terminal development alternatives to airport tenants including the airlines, car rental companies and concessionaires on November 2, 2023 during monthly tenant meeting. The Airport hosted a second meeting with the Signatory Airlines to discuss additional details related to the terminal development alternatives on December 12, 2023. The airport is presenting the revised alternatives to the Airport Commission for a selection and recommendation to the City Council on December 20, 2023. Terminal Common Use (Updated December 11, 2023) Background: This project is to install Common Use Passenger Processing System (CUPPS) at each of the 18 boarding gates and at the non -signatory airline ticket counters. This includes renovations to the Bono Concourse which involve replacement of customer service podiums, lighting and signage upgrades and carpet replacement for both concourses. Status: In process - construction. Invitation For Bid #21-28 was issued on February 15th for construction of Bono concourse podiums and the renovation of the concourse. The City Council approved a contract with the most qualified firm (CalTec) on May 11, 2023. The Regional Jet (RJ) concourse gates have been fully converted onto the Common Use platform. New carpet installation is nearly complete in the RJ ITEM 7.F concourse as a part of this project. Renovation of boarding gates 5 & 7 of the Bono concourse have been completed. Gate 9 is currently under construction with an estimated completion date of December 141n Gate 11 will be the next gate taken out of commission with an expected completion date of January 3, 2024. The airport is closely monitoring medium -range flight schedules to determine if an extension to the CalTec contract is warranted to enable increased frequency starting in February. Employee and Economy Parking tots & Commercial Transit reconfiguration (updated December 11, 2023) Background: This project aims to complete three objectives: 1) design and build a new employee parking lot west of the airport at El Cielo and Baristo; 2) convert the current overflow and employee lots to economy lots; and 3) make changes to commercial ground transportation staging areas. PSP's focus is on incorporating and improving technology thru these designs by introducing a new Parking and Revenue Control System, adding EV charging, and upgrading fiber capability to accommodate security improvements. Staff has been working thru state and federal programs to procure EV charging capability. Status: In process. The Airport has given direction to the consulting firm C and S to conduct a Project Definition Report with the aim of better defining scope and costs for construction. The Airport has directed C and S to focus on Lot A, as well as the site at the corner of El Cielo and Baristo which is anticipated to be the future Employee Parking Lot. Airport staff have asked C and S to delay most study and analysis related to the current overflow lot at the south end of the Airport until such time as there is a City Council approved terminal development alternative selected. Restroom Renovations (updated December 11, 2023) Background: City Council approved Airport staff to design and renovate all public restrooms airport wide in the FY 2023 budget. This would include demolition and replacement of all flooring and fixtures, upgrades to ventilation and lighting systems, and conversion of some restrooms to gender neutral facilities. Status: In progress — Project Definition. Airport staff provided Gensler with Notice to Proceed with a project definition report for design and renovation of restrooms at the Bono concourse and in the courtyard areas while a decision and approval of a terminal development alternative is pending. These areas will be considered Phase I of the project. Airport staff intend to provide direction to Gensler to commence design upon City Council approval of a preferred terminal alternative. Taxiway W and AI Rehabilitation (updated December 11, 2023) Background: This is an Airport Improvement Program (AIP) funded project to design and rehabilitate the Airport's primary commercial taxiway under the Pavement Management Program. Status: In Design. The Airport's on -call engineering firm RS&H completed surveying and destructive testing of the pavement to determine the project approach for rehabilitation. The rehabilitation design has been underway since March. RS&H has notified airport staff that 90% design is ready for Airport review. The Airport will meet with the RS&H team on December 12th for an updated. PSP is applying to the FAA for competitive discretionary funding which, if successful, would enable this project to move forward for construction in CY 2024. Palm Springs �Uternational Airport 2 Outbound Baggage Handling System Replacement: (Updated October 16, 2023) Background: This project is intended to modify or replace the current outbound baggage handling system with a new inline baggage handling system to improve capacity and process efficiency, implement additional technology for bag tracking, reduce or eliminate single points of failure, and improve ergonomics. Status: In process - design: City Council approved the selection of AECOM for inline outbound baggage handling system design services. AECOM is underway on design with expected 30% designs in late October. Airport staff and AECOM have held a number of meetings with TSA and FAA stakeholders to review initial concepts and seek input. Airport staff will be meeting with airline stakeholders in the coming weeks to garner feedback on initial design concepts. The timing of federal funding suggests that PSP will target CY 202S for construction. Baggage Claim Expansion and Renovation (Updated October 16, 2023): Background: This project was previously identified on the Airport's Capital Improvement Program (CIP) list for start in FY 2025. Status: In process - design. In the Fall of 2022, Airport staff applied for a nation-wide competitive grant under the Airports Terminal Program (ATP) under the 2021 Bipartisan Infrastructure Law. Airport staff was notified on February 27th that PSP had been awarded a $5.7M grant to partially fund expansion of baggage claim. Airport staff has determined that a Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR) project delivery methodology is appropriate for this project and Request for Proposal #34-23 was advertised. A contract award for Construction Manager at Risk to Skanska was approved by the City Council in July 2023 with a project budget of $27M. Primary funding sources for this project include BIL ATP, BIL allocation, and Airport Improvement Program funds. This project was included in the airport's proposed budget and as such the airport will also be working with the airlines upon adoption of the 2024 budget on capitalizing any remaining costs. The Airport's on -call consultant is working toward 30% design and has held initial stakeholder input meetings with the airlines, car rental companies, TSA and Airport staff. Public Parking Electrification — Lot D (Updated October 16, 2023) Background: Airport staff applied for the Southern California Edison electric vehicle charging infrastructure rebate program in the winter of 2022. The program is designed to provide no -cost infrastructure to enable Level 2 electric vehicle charging with the caveat that sponsors self -procure level 2 chargers. Status: PSP was approved for expansion of electric infrastructure under the SCE rebate program. Request for Proposal #04-23 was issued on June 1, 2023 for procurement of 40 level two chargers to serve 80 parking positions. Airport staff have ordered the Level 2 chargers which are set to arrive by the end of October. Staff is preparing an Request for Proposal to install the chargers once the infrastructure work has been completed by SCE. The Airport anticipates that, infrastructure work to commence in the late fall of 2023. Airport staff is developing costs recovery rate and fee plans for EV charging spaces and anticipates bringing proposals to the finance committee in the winter of 2023. Palm Springs uaternational Airport 3 Sterile Area Shade Structures (updated October 16, 2023) Background: This project aims to add shade structures post security to encourage broader use of the Airport during summer months. This project is partially funded through a grant facilitated by Visit Greater Palm Springs. Status: Awaiting Permit. Design of the sterile area shade structures was completed and airport staff sought permits for construction in August. As a result of the Wexler Terminal being listed on the Federal Historic Preservation Register, the structures are subject to additional approvals and vetting before permits can be secured. The airport is currently awaiting permit approval. Program Updates Feasibility Study for Federal Inspection Station (international Air Service) (Updated December 11, 2023) Background: This two -phased study (partially funded by Visit Greater Palm Springs) seeks to analyze how small and medium hub airports have successfully constructed an FIS and expanded international routes to their facilities, and subsequently develop a business plan for expansion of Customs and Boarder Protection Services for commercial flights at PSP. Status: In Process — Phase II; Airport staff gave InterVISTAS Notice to Proceed on Phase II of the study which involves a PSP-specific FIS plan on October 4, 2023. InterVISTAS is currently working on two tasks: the market demand analysis and the economic impact analysis. Airport staff have a meeting scheduled with InterVISTAS staff on December 12th to discuss the status of the study and to provide direction as required. Airport staff is continuing discussions with Customs and Boarder Protection regional leadership about PSP plans to expand international air service. Palm Springs 4%ternational Airport promoted three Maintenance Workers to the position of Maintenance Technician I thru an external recruitment. Since the start of the fiscal year, the HR team has recruited for nine different classifications and has filled 8 of 13 FTEs across those nine classifications. Of the 85 airport only positions allocated to PSP there are currently 21 vacancies. The airport HR Specialist has been hired and began work on August 2$th Commissioner request for agenda item to update on Persons without Legitimate Business & Unhoused Population (Updated December 11, 2023) Background: Airport staff received a Commissioner request for ongoing updates surrounding the unhoused population at the Airport. The Airport has experienced an increase in persons without legitimate business within the terminal area, including unhoused persons living on the Airport campus and populating the terminal. Report: Airport staff and the Police Department began enforcement of the Legitimate Business ordinance at midnight on March 12th. There was an immediate and noticeable decline in persons without legitimate business and unhoused individuals occupying the Airport property upon enforcement. The Airport can report that the situation remains unchanged and there has been no observed increase in persons without legitimate business on the airport. Palm Springs international Airport 2 Attachments Item 1 F SUBJECT APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO CONTRACT SERVICES AGREEMENT NO. A9154 WITH AMADEUS AIRPORT IT AMERICAS, INC. TO PROVIDE A COMMONISHARED USE PASSENGER PROCESSING SYSTEM FOR THE PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOARDING GATES RECOMMENDATION: 1. Approve Amendment No. 1 to Contract Services Agreement No. A9154 with Amadeus Airport IT Americas, Inc. for the addition of eleven ticket counter common/shared use positions in the ticketing wing, eight customer service counter common/shared use positions in the Bono Concourse, and four spare common/shared use positions, in an amount not to exceed $225,859.51 and to extend the schedule for the common/shared use project to a completion date of March 29, 2024, and for the project to be fully operational by April 19, 2024, 2. Appropriate $225,859.51 from Airport Fund 416 to the account 4167065.80000 budget. 3. Allow the City Manager or designee to execute all necessary documents. Attachments Item 1 G SUBJECT APPROVE CONTRACT SERVICES AGREEMENT NO. 2313225 WITH GRANITE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY FOR ON -CALL PAVEMENT REPAIR SERVICES FOR PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT RECOMMENDATION: 1. Approve Contract Services Agreement 238225 with Granite Construction Company to provide on -call pavement repair services for the Palm Springs International Airport in an amount not to exceed $3,000,000 for the initial three-year term beginning November 1, 2023, through October 31, 2026, with two one-year extension options at the City's sole discretion. 2. Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute all necessary documents Attachments Item 11 ITEM 10.A / 12-20-23 Page 213 SUBJECT SECOND READING AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 2072 TO AMEND SECTION 16.36.020 OF THE PALM SPRINGS MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THE CONDUCT AND APPEARANCE OF AIRPORT COMMERCIAL VEHICLE OPERATORS RECOMMENDATION: Waive the second reading of text in its entirety, read by title only, and adopt Ordinance No. 2072, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 16,36.020 OF THE PALM SPRINGS MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THE CONDUCT AND APPEARANCE OF AIRPORT COMMERCIAL VEHICLE OPERATORS." Attachments Item 1 CC ITEM 10.A / 12-20-23 Page 313 ITEM 10.13 - FUTURE CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS Airport Commission Meeting of December 20, 2023 December 14. 2023 • USA Shade & Fabric Structures — Cooperative agreement for shade structures • DeAngelo Contracting Services, LLC — On -call weed abatement services • Genesis Floor Covering, Inc. — On -call flooring repair and replacement services • MobileMoney, Inc. —Lease agreement for Airport ATM's • Turo Inc. — Non-exclusive operating agreement for Peer -to -Peer vehicle sharing • Tetra Tech AMT — Contract services agreement for safety system services ITEM 10.8 / 12-20-23 Page 111 Palm Springs International Airport MONTHLY PASSENGER ACTIVITY REPORT - 2023 Enplaned Deplaned Total Passengers 2023 2022 % Change 2023 2022 % Change 2023 2022 % Change January 169.746 118,204 43.6% 171,910 119,184 44.2% 341,656 237,388 43.9% February 184,973 142,206 30.1% 188,877 150,130 25.8% 373,850 292,336 27.9% March 223,314 202,993 10.0% 226,832 200,890 12.9% 450,146 403,883 11.5% April 200,753 185,946 8.0% 178,600 172,169 3.7% 379,353 358,115 5.9% May 129,695 123,736 4.8% 116,491 109,503 6.4% 246,186 233,239 5.6% June 71,635 73,861 -3.0% 66,826 68,663 -2.7% 138,461 142,524 -2.9% July 63,647 68,071 -6.5% 60,689 65,593 -7.5% 124,336 133,664 -7.0% August 59,309 65,368 -9.3% 59,947 64,584 -7.2% 119,256 129,952 -8.2% September 73,813 79,599 -7.3% 77,748 83,235 -6.6% 151,561 162,834 -6.9% October 126,702 120,659 5.0% 133,106 126,798 5.0% 259,808 247,457 5.0% November 162,180 160,129 1.3% 165,290 159,108 3.9% 327,470 319,237 2.6% December 159,846 -100.0% 161,369 -100.0% - 321,215 -100.0% Year to Date 1,465,767 1,500,618 9.3% 1,446,316 1,481,226 9.6% 2,912,083 2,981,844 1 Page 1 of 4 ITEM 11.A Palm Springs International Airport ACTIVITY BY AIRLINE NOVEMBER 2023 AIRLINES Enplaned 2023 2022 % Change Deplaned 2023 2022 % Change Total 2023 2022 % Change (E & D) Market Share Air Canada 5,670 4,443 27.6% 5,771 4,744 21.6% 11,441 9,187 24.5% 3.5% Alaska 30,823 31,217 -1.3% 30,674 30,999 -1.06/" 61,497 62,216 -1.2% 18.8% American 23,979 24,770 -3.2% 24,029 23,008 4.4% 48,008 47,778 0.5% 14.7% Avelo Air 2,477 1,710 44.9% 2,560 1,911 34,011% 5,037 3,621 39.1% 1.5% Delta Air 51840 5.611 4.1% 5,840 5,674 2.9% 11,680 11,285 3.5% 3.6% Mesa (AA) - 74 -100.0% - 73 -100.0% - 147 -100.0% 0.0% SkyWest (Delta Connection) 5,403 5,077 6.4% 5,467 4,969 10.0% 10,870 10,046 8.2% 3.3% SkyWest (United Express) 8,324 10,027 -17.0% 8,827 9,760 -9.6% 17,151 19,787 -13.3% 5.2% SkyWest (AA) 5,314 3,522 50.9% 5,120 3,542 44.6% 10,434 7,064 47.7% 3.2% Southwest Air 29,421 29,673 -0.8% 30,654 29,935 2.4% 60,075 59,608 0.8% 18.3% United 20,427 14,659 39.3% 20,384 14,478 40.8% 40,811 29,137 40.1% 12.5% WestJet 16,585 18,151 -8.6% 17,883 18,521 -3.4% 34,468 36,672 -6.0% 10.5% Alle iant Air 1,457 2,039 -28.5% 1,468 2,010 -27.0% 2,925 4,049 -27.8% 0.9% Flair - 1,862 -100.0% - 1,862 -100.0% - 3,724 -100.0% 0.0% JetBlue 3,284 3,729 -11.9% 3,143 3,767 -16.6% 6,427 7,496 -14.3% 2.0% MN Airlines (Sun Country) 3,176 3,565 -10.9% 3,470 3,855 -10.0% 6.646 7,420 -10.4% 2.0% Charters - - 0.0% - - 0.0% - - 0 0% 0.0% TOTAL 162,180 160,129 1.3% 165,290 159,108 3.9% 327,470 319,237 2.6% 100.0% Page 3 of 4 Palm Springs International Airport PASSENGER ACTIVITY REPORT - FISCAL YEAR COMPARISON ENPLANED PASSENGERS DEPLANED PASSENGERS TOTAL PASSENGERS FY '23=24 xcwxoc FY'22-'23 x FY'21=22 c FY '20=21 FY'23=24 xcwwoc FY '22=23 xuwpc FY'21=22 xcw.nc FY '26=21 FY'23-'24 x FY'22=23 FY'21=22 xcwunc FY'20=21 July 63,647 -6% 68,071 3% 65,869 282% 17,231 60,689 -7% 65,593 3% 63,594 1- 284% 16,545 124,336 -7% 133,884 t 3% 129,463 253% 33 778 August 59309 -9% 65,368 11% 58,793 220% 10,389 59,947 -7% 44,584 9% 99,159 T_ 227% 18,093 119256 -8% 129,952 10% 117, 552 ,. 223% 36,482 September73,813 -7% 79,599 21% 65,882 104% 23,087 77,748 -7% 33,235 17% 7098d :. 888% 24,828 151561 -7% 182 334 99% 136¢66 ^' 1B5% 47,915 October 126,702 1' 5% 120,659 11% 108,923 '" 162% 41.597 133,106 .. 5% 1215,798 8% 177068 148% 47,180 259,508 5% 247,457 9% 225,991 155% 88,777 November 162, 180 1% 160129 18% 135,677 157% 52,874 165,290 + 4% 159,108 17% 136,287 147% 55,169 327470 3% 319.237 17% 271.944 - 152% 108,043 December -1 00% 159, 448 17% 136897 230% 41,517 -100% 781,369 16% 139,630 234% 41,745 -100% 321.215 1;° 16% 278.527 - 232% 83,262 January -100% 189748 44% 116,204 198% 39814 -100% 171910 44% 119,164 202% 39488 -100% 341,656 44% 237,388 200% 79,OB2 February %,-100% 184973 30% 142206 147% 57530 -100% 188,677 28% 150,130 138% 63.127 - -100% 373.850 28% 292,336 142% 120,657 March -100% 223314 10% 202,993 89% 107577 -100% 226,832Hl�i 2 00.990 88% 1D6,900 -100% 450146 11% 403,883 ^� 89% 214477 April -100% 20D,753 8% 1B5,948 � 67% 111376 -100% 179,600 172,169 65% 104401 -10D% 379353 ; 6% 358,115 �.'� 55% 215,777 May -100% 129,695 5% 123.736 33% 92,820 -100% 116,491 109 503 3A% 81,715 -100°k 246 18S ^' 6% 233,239 34%June -100% 71,635 -ff 3% 73,861 rt?, 10% B6,885 -100% 56828 68,863 9% 62,987 - -100% 138,481 -3% 142,524 . 10% 129,B72 YTD 45,5,651 . 0% ,633, 88 1 8, 81 ,, 1W% 670,49 4 , 80 ,610,223 1,407,El41 7, 1137 662.1581 982,431 IW -7()%l 3,244,011 1r 15Y.1 2,825,020 1^1 112% 1,332,655 ITEM 11.13 III A M I WIMA 11 ill JO aueeliv,Ilyilr092121 M1=l49V[&I Airport Commission Meeting of December 20, 2023 Date Time Committee January 17, 2024 4:00 P.M. Noise Committee TBD TBD Ad Hoc Design Review Committee TBD TBD Budget and Finance Committee TBD TBD Marketin and Business Development Committee TBD TBD Operations, Properties and Facilities Committee ITEM 12.A •/ 12-20-23 Page 1 11 AIRPORT COMMITTEES FY2023-24 REVISED 12-14-23 REPRESENTING COMMISSIONERS Marketing (7 Members) Budget {7 Members)* Operations (7 Membersj Noise (5 Membersj Ad Hoc Design Review (5 Members)* Indian Wells BERRIMAN, Robert Member Palm Springs BURKE, Todd Chair Member Member Palm Springs CALDWELL, Daniel Member Member Palm Springs CORCORAN, Kevin Member Member _ Palm Springs DADA, Aftab Palm Springs FELTMAN, David Chair Member Palm Springs FONG, J Craig Member Member La Quinta HUGHES, Kathleen Member Palm Springs MARTIN, Tracy Chair Cathedral City MICHAELIS, Tony Member Member Riverside County PARK, Margaret Member Desert Hot Springs PYE, Jan Member Member Palm Springs SUERO, Guillermo Member Palm Desert WISEMAN, Kevin Member Member Chair Member Indio WISE, Rick Member Member Rancho Mirage YOUNG, Keith Member Member *Budget & Finance Committee has one (1) vacancy Ad Hoc Design Review Committee has one (1) vacancy