Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2083ORDINANCE NO. 2083 ' AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CASE 5.1541 CZ, CHANGE OF ZONE, TO AMEND THE CURRENT SPLIT ZONE DESIGNATIONS OF 'CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT' (CBD) AND 'LIMITED MULTIPLE -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL' (R-2) TO 'RETAIL BUSINESS' (C-1) ENTIRELY FOR A PROPOSED MIXED -USE PROJECT WHICH INCLUDES 24 RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM UNITS AND A 5.411-SQUARE-FOOT COMMERCIAL SPACE ON 2.4-ACRE UNDEVELOPED PARCELS LOCATED AT 575 NORTH PALM CANYON DRIVE, ZONE CBD/R-2, SECTION 10. City Attorney's Summary This ordinance amends the split -zone designations of certain property located at 575 North Palm Canyon Drive from 'Central Business District' (CBD) and 'Limited Multiple Family Residential' (R-2) entirely to 'Retail Business' (C-1) in order to permit the development of twenty-four (24) residential condominium units and a 5,411 square foot commercial space on 2.4-acre undeveloped parcels. The ordinance also makes certain findings required by the Palm Springs Municipal Code for zoning changes to land. WHEREAS, Old Las Palmas Partners, LLC, (the "Applicant") has filed Case 5.1541 CZ, Change of Zone (CZ), Case TTM 38190, Tentative Tract Map (TTM), Case 6.560 VAR, Variance, and Case 3.4191 MAJ/DEV, Major Development Permit, applications in accordance with Sections 94.07.00 (Change of Zone), 9.60 (Subdivision of Land — General Provision), 94.06.00 (Variance), and 94.04.01 (Development Permit) of the Plan Springs Zoning and Municipal Codes for a proposed mixed -use project which includes 24 residential condominium units and a 5,411-square-foot commercial space on 2.4-acre undeveloped parcels located at 575 North Palm Canyon Drive; and WHEREAS the current zone designations of the project site are 'Central Business District' (CBD) and 'Limited Multiple -Family Residential' (R-2); and WHEREAS the applicant has requested a Change of Zone (CZ) from the current 'Central Business District' (CBD) and 'Limited Multiple -Family Residential' (R-2) to 'Retail Business' (C-1) entirely; and WHEREAS, on December 14, 2022, a public hearing on Case 5.1541 CZ, Case TTM 38190, and Case 6.560 VAR was held by the Planning Commission in accordance ' with applicable law; the Planning Commission voted 5-1-1 (Moruzzi absent, Roberts abstained) to continue the project to a date uncertain and form a subcommittee which Ordinance No. 2083 Page 2 consisted of Commissioners Miller, Hirschbein, and Aylaian to assist the applicant. Case 3.4191 MAJ/DEV was not subject to a public hearing; and , WHEREAS, on February 8, 2023, a public hearing on Case 5.1541 CZ, Case TTM 38190, and Case 6.560 VAR was held by the Planning Commission in accordance with applicable law; the Planning Commission voted 6-1 (Roberts absent) to approve Case Nos. TTM 38190, 6.560 VAR, and 3.4191 MAJ/DEV subject to conditions of approval and to recommend approval of Case 5.1541 CZ to the City Council; and WHEREAS the proposed project is considered a "project" pursuant to the terms of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), and an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) has been prepared for this project and has been distributed for public review and comment in accordance with CEQA; and WHEREAS, on March 9, 2023, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on the Project in accordance with applicable law. The City Council carefully reviewed and considered all of the evidence presented in connection with the hearing on the Project, including but not limited to the staff report, all environmental data including the IS/MND prepared for the project and all written and oral testimony presented, and found the IS/MND to be in compliance with CEQA and found that any potentially significant environmental impacts outlined in the report will be adequately mitigated to less than significant levels; and WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the March 9, 2023, public hearing, the City , Council introduced and waived further reading of this Ordinance adopting the final MND and to change the current zoning designation of the subject property from 'Central Business District' (CBD) and 'Limited Multiple Family Residential' (R-2) entirely to 'Retail Business' (C-1). THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the recitals reflected above are true and correct and are incorporated by this reference herein as the cause and foundation for the action taken by and through this Ordinance. SECTION 2. Pursuant to Zoning Code Section 94.07.00(A) — "the council in reviewing a proposed change of zone shall consider whether the following conditions exist in reference to the proposed zoning of the subject property". - The proposed change of zone is in conformity with the general plan map and report. The General Plan land use designation of the site is CBD (Central Business District). The project proposes to change the site's current split zone designations of CBD (Central Business District) and R-2 (Limited Multiple -Family Residential) Ordinance No. 2083 Page 3 to C-1 (Retail Business) entirely. Mixed -use developments are permitted by right in the C-1 Zone per Palm Springs Zoning Code (PSZC) Section 92.12.01(A)(35), and it is consistent with the intent of the CBD General Plan land use designation area which encourages a mix of commercial and residential uses (Palm Springs 2007 General Plan, page 2-7). The proposed project meets the General Plan density requirement of the CBD land use designation area as well. 2. The subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed zone, in terms of access, size of parcel, relationship to similar or related uses, and other considerations deemed relevant by the commission and council. Mixed -use developments are permitted by right in the C-1 Zone per Palm Springs Zoning Code (PSZC) Section 92.12.01(A)(35), and the C-1 Zone allows a variety of retail uses by right as demonstrated in PSZC Section 92.12.01(A). The 2.4-acre project site area far exceeds the minimum lot size requirement of the C-1 Zone. The proposed residential and commercial uses are compatible with the site's surrounding uses, which include single/multi-family residential and commercial/professional. 3. The proposed change of zone is necessary and proper at this time and is not likely to be detrimental to the adjacent property or residents. ' The site's zone designation is currently split (CBD & R-2 Zones). The approval of the Change of Zone will allow future development and land uses at the site to be governed under the regulations of one zone entirely, which allows more seamless and consistent development throughout the site. A majority of the properties on both sides of North Palm Canyon Drive between Alejo Road and East Vista Chino are zoned C-1, and only five parcels on the west side of North Palm Canyon Drive are zoned CBD in the section. The approval of the Change of Zone will result in the extension of the C-1 Zone designation along North Palm Canyon Drive, and the proposed uses are compatible with the site's surroundings. SECTION 3. Pursuant to California Law, this Ordinance was introduced at first reading on March 9, 2023, and adopted at second reading on April 10, 2023 for the approval of Case 5.1541 CZ Change of Zone and the Mitigated Negative Declaration. SECTION 4. The City Council hereby adopts this Ordinance to amend the current zone designations of the project site, 575 North Palm Canyon Drive, from 'Central Business District' (CBD) and Limited Multiple -Family Residential (R-2) to'Retail Business' (C-1) entirely, subject to conditions of approval as outlined in attached Exhibit "A". SECTION 5.A Mitigated Negative Declaration (MIND) has been completed in compliance with CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The City Council finds that, with the incorporation of mitigation measures, the implementation of the project will have a less than significant impact on the environment. The City Council independently reviewed and considered the information contained in the Ordinance No. 2083 Page 4 MND prior to its review of this Project and the MND reflects the City Council's independent judgment and analysis. SECTION 4. The Mayor shall sign and the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same, or the summary thereof, to be published and posted pursuant to the provisions of law and this Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after passage. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PALM SPRINGS CITY COUNCIL THIS 10TH DAY OF APRIL. 2023. Grace Elena Grace Mayor ATTEST: 22L:n,- Brenda Pree City Clerk Ordinance No. 2083 Page 5 CERTIFICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss. CITY OF PALM SPRINGS) I, BRENDA FREE, City Clerk of the City of Palm Springs, California, do hereby certify that Ordinance No. 2083 is a full, true, and correct copy, and was introduced at a regular meeting of the Palm Springs City Council on March 9, 2023, and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on April 10, 2023 by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers deHarte, Holstege, Middleton, Mayor Pro Tem Bernstein, Mayor Garner NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Palm Springs, California, this JZ day of A°`� ;1 , 2023. /4� ' Brenda Pree, MMC,CERA, City Clerk City of Palm Springs, California F