The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutFY 23-24 District 8 ReportCity of Palm Springs – Engineer’s Report Parkway Maintenance District No. 8, Vintage Palms Subject Fiscal Year: 2023 / 2024 _________________________________________________________________________________________________ CITY OF PALM SPRINGS ENGINEER’S REPORT PARKWAY MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 “VINTAGE PALMS” FISCAL YEAR 2023 / 2024 City of Palm Springs – Engineer’s Report Parkway Maintenance District No. 8, Vintage Palms Subject Fiscal Year: 2023 / 2024 _________________________________________________________________________________________________ Engineer's Report Affidavit Palm Springs Parkway Maintenance District No. 8, “Vintage Palms” This Report describes the District including the improvements, budget, parcels and assessments to be levied for the subject fiscal, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the Riverside County Assessor’s maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectfully submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. By: ________________________________ Joel Montalvo, P.E. City Engineer City of Palm Springs Civil Engineer C 62624 City of Palm Springs – Engineer’s Report Parkway Maintenance District No. 8, Vintage Palms Subject Fiscal Year: 2023 / 2024 _________________________________________________________________________________________________ CITY OF PALM SPRINGS ENGINEER’S REPORT PARKWAY MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 VINTAGE PALMS The Undersigned respectfully submits the enclosed report as directed by the City Council. The undersigned certifies that he is a Professional Engineer, registered in the State of California. _________________________ Joel Montalvo, P.E. City Engineer City of Palm Springs County of Riverside, California I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer’s Report, together with the Assessment Roll and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was filed with me on: 29th day of June, 2023. _________________________ Brenda Pree City Clerk City of Palm Springs County of Riverside, California I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer’s Report, together with the Assessment Roll thereto attached, was approved and confirmed by the Palm Springs City Council on: 24th day of July, 2023. _________________________ Brenda Pree City Clerk City of Palm Springs County of Riverside, California City of Palm Springs – Engineer’s Report Parkway Maintenance District No. 8, Vintage Palms Subject Fiscal Year: 2023 / 2024 _________________________________________________________________________________________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ 1 A. Introduction .................................................................................................... 1 B. Overview ........................................................................................................ 1 DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICT ............................................................................................ 2 A. Description of the District ................................................................................ 2 B. Description of Improvements and Services ..................................................... 2 METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT .............................................................................................. 4 A. General .......................................................................................................... 4 B. Benefit Analysis .............................................................................................. 4 C. Assessment Methodology .............................................................................. 5 D. Assessment Formula………………………………………………….…..………..5 DISTRICT BUDGET ................................................................................................................... 6 A. Description of Budget Items............................................................................ 6 B. District Budget ................................................................................................ 8 APPENDIX A – District Diagrams ............................................................................................... 9 APPENDIX B – Assessment Roll .............................................................................................. 13 City of Palm Springs – Engineer’s Report Parkway Maintenance District No. 8, Vintage Palms Subject Fiscal Year: 2023 / 2024 _________________________________________________________________________________________________ City of Palm Springs, Parkway Maintenance District No. 8 – Engineer’s Report Page 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A. INTRODUCTION The purpose of this Engineer’s Report (hereinafter referred to as the “Report”) is to set forth the engineering analysis and findings for the levy of assessments in the City of Palm Springs (hereinafter referred to as the “City”) Parkway Maintenance District No. 8 (“Vintage Palms”), (hereinafter referred to as the “District”), for the subject fiscal year, in compliance with the requirements of Chapter 3, of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (hereinafter referred to as the “1972 Act”) which is part 2, Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code and as provided by Article XIII D of the California Constitution (hereinafter referred to as “Article XIII D”). This District was formed to supplement certain City revenues and help finance the costs of providing for parkway maintenance within the District’s boundaries. The City initiates proceedings for annual levying of assessments within the District by passing a resolution, which states that the District was established under the Act. This resolution also describes the improvements, describes the name and location of the District, and preliminarily approves the Engineer’s Report. The report prepared by the engineer must include an estimate of the costs of the improvements, a diagram, i.e., map of the District showing the boundary of the District and an assessment of the estimated costs of the improvements against the parcels or lots which benefit from the improvements. Once the report is completed it is presented to the City Council for its review and approval as presented, or it may be modified and approved. After the report is approved, the City Council may adopt a Resolution of Intention, which declares its intent to levy and collect assessments, describes the improvements, and refers to the report for details of the District. The Resolution of Intention also sets a time and place for a hearing on the proposed assessments. In 2004, the City initiated proceedings to increase the existing maximum annual assessments within the District, such that additional improvements to the street lighting system could occur, and that funds collected for this District could equal the current costs to operate and maintain the improvements. At the July 21, 2004, City Council meeting, a Public Hearing was conducted and a property owner protest ballot proceeding concluded, with the failure of the proposed increase to the existing maximum annual assessments within the District. This Engineer’s Report continues to disclose the fact that the District is operating with a deficit, and continues to require the supplement of General Fund revenues from the City to operate and maintain the improvements within this District. In 2005, upon adoption of the confirmed Engineer’s Report for this District for the 2005/2006 fiscal year, the City Council directed the City Engineer to schedule property owner protest ballot proceedings on the matter of approving an increase to the maximum annual assessment, as necessary to increase assessments to cover estimated annual expenses and to implement a Consumer Price Index (“CPI”) annual inflator. At the July 19, 2006, City Council meeting, a Public Hearing was conducted and a property owner protest ballot proceeding concluded, with the failure of the proposed increase to the existing maximum annual assessments within the District. The Engineer’s Report continued to disclose the fact that the District is operating with a deficit, and continued to require the supplement of General Fund revenues from the City to operate and maintain the improvements within this District. City of Palm Springs – Engineer’s Report Parkway Maintenance District No. 8, Vintage Palms Subject Fiscal Year: 2023 / 2024 _________________________________________________________________________________________________ City of Palm Springs, Parkway Maintenance District No. 8 – Engineer’s Report Page 2 In 2007, upon adoption of the confirmed Engineer’s Report for this District for the 2007/2008 fiscal year, the City Council directed the City Engineer to schedule a third and final property owner protest ballot proceeding on the matter of approving an increase to the maximum annual assessment, as necessary to increase assessments to cover estimated annual expenses and to implement a Consumer Price Index (“CPI”) annual inflator. On January 16, 2008, the property owner protest ballot proceeding was conducted, and in accordance with requirements of the California State Constitution Article XIIIC and XIIID (“Proposition 218”), increased annual assessments and implementation of a CPI annual inflator were approved. This Engineer’s Report has been prepared in accordance with the previous City Council direction. B. OVERVIEW The District described in this report includes all lots and parcels within the residential area identified as “Vintage Palms”, consisting of Tract 24853-1 and the remainder portion of Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 25864 consisting of approximately 55 acres of vacant land. The City proposes to annually levy and collect special assessments to continue the maintenance of the improvements within the proposed District. Assessments within the District are proposed to be levied annually, pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (the “1972 Act”) and in compliance with the substantive and procedural requirements of the California State Constitution Article XIIIC and XIIID (“Proposition 218”). The assessments described in this Engineer’s Report (hereinafter referred to as the “Report”) shall be levied upon each parcel within the boundaries of the District and assessments shall be proportional to the special benefit received from the maintenance of the improvements. For the District, a benefit assessment rate per Parcel is established based upon estimated and actual operations and maintenance costs for the year. This establishes the maximum approved benefit assessment rate (“Maximum Rate”) for the current year. Commencing with fiscal year 2015/2017, and then each subsequent year, the maximum assessment rate is proposed to be increased based upon the Consumer Price Index, All Urban Consumers, for the Los Angeles-Orange-Riverside County Area ("CPI"), as determined by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, or its successor. The Engineer shall compute the percentage difference between the CPI for the latest monthly statistical data available each year at the time the Engineer’s Report is prepared, with the CPI for the same monthly statistical data from the prior year, and shall then adjust the maximum existing assessment by an amount not to exceed such percentage for the following fiscal year. Should the Bureau of Labor Statistics revise such index or discontinue the preparation of such index, the Engineer shall use the revised index or a comparable system as approved by the City Council for determining fluctuations in the cost of living. This Report describes the District and the proposed assessments for the subject fiscal year. The annual budget for the maintenance and operation of the improvements is based on estimated expenses for the upcoming fiscal year. The word “parcel,” for the purposes of this Report, refers to an individual property assigned its own Assessment Parcel Number by the Riverside County (“County”) Assessor’s Office. The Riverside County Auditor/Controller uses Assessment Parcel Numbers and specific Fund Numbers to identify on the tax roll properties assessed for special district benefit assessments. City of Palm Springs – Engineer’s Report Parkway Maintenance District No. 8, Vintage Palms Subject Fiscal Year: 2023 / 2024 _________________________________________________________________________________________________ City of Palm Springs, Parkway Maintenance District No. 8 – Engineer’s Report Page 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICT A. DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICT The District originally included all lots and parcels within the residential area identified as “Vintage Palms”, consisting of Tract 24853-1 and the remaining portion of Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 25864, for a total of 62 single family residential lots and two vacant parcels. However, on May 5, 2004, by Resolution 20920 adopted by the City Council, Planned Development District 290, Tentative Tract Map 31848 (otherwise originally known as “Palm Springs Village” and subsequently as “Avalon”) was approved. Included in the City Council’s approval was the requirement to incorporate the existing parkway landscaping along the west side of Avenida Caballeros, north of San Rafael Drive, into the project. This segment of parkway landscaping would be transferred over to the project, and ultimately, a private Home Owners Association, for maintenance. In April 2006, the project commenced construction; clearing and rough grading was begun. Confirmation was received from the developer that removal of the parkway landscaping along the west side of Avenida Caballeros north of San Rafael Drive within the District would occur prior to June 30, 2006, (the end of the 2005/2006 fiscal year). Therefore, with the 2006/2007 Engineer’s Report, it was identified that the westerly landscaped parkway along Avenida Caballeros north of San Rafael Drive, originally included in the District, was eliminated and excluded (de-annexed) from the District. All future parkway maintenance of this area will be the responsibility of the adjacent property through a Home Owners Association and recorded Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R’s), for the project now identified as “Avalon”. Therefore, the remainder portion of Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 25864 consisting of approximately 55 acres of vacant land, (previously identified as two vacant parcels by Assessor’s Parcel Number 669-330-035 and 669-330-036), now included as part of the “Avalon” project, have been removed (de-annexed) from the District. The remaining parkway landscaping along the east side of Avenida Caballeros north of San Rafael Drive, and along the north side of San Rafael Drive adjacent to the Vintage Palms development, represent the improvements included in the District, to benefit the 62 single family residential lots within Tract 24853-1. The purpose of the District is to ensure the ongoing maintenance and servicing of parkway landscape improvements installed in connection with development of properties within the District. This District will provide the financial mechanism (annual assessments) by which the ongoing operation and maintenance of these improvements will be funded. The District structure, proposed improvements, method of apportionment and assessments described in this Report are based on improvement plans including all estimated direct expenditures, incidental expenses, and reserves associated with the maintenance and servicing of the improvements. B. DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS AND SERVICES The purpose of the District is to ensure the ongoing maintenance, operation and servicing of parkway landscape improvements within the District. These improvements may include, but are not limited to, palm trees, turf areas with mowing strips, desert indigenous trees and ground cover, annual flowers, a sprinkler irrigation and emitter drip system, landscape drainage system, walkways and associated appurtenant facilities located in the dedicated landscaped parkway (street right-of-way) on the north side of San Rafael Drive and on the east side1 of Avenida Caballeros north of San Rafael Drive, and all materials, equipment, 1 Modified by the 2006/2007 Engineer’s Report, previously the west side of Avenida Caballeros was included in the District, but was subsequently de-annexed from the District and absorbed for maintenance by the adjacent project, “Avalon”. City of Palm Springs – Engineer’s Report Parkway Maintenance District No. 8, Vintage Palms Subject Fiscal Year: 2023 / 2024 _________________________________________________________________________________________________ City of Palm Springs, Parkway Maintenance District No. 8 – Engineer’s Report Page 4 utilities, labor and appurtenant facilities related to the operation and maintenance of the parkway landscape improvements. The estimated annual cost to provide and maintain the improvements within the District shall be allocated to each property in proportion to the special benefits received. The Method of Apportionment described in this Report utilizes commonly accepted assessment engineering practices and has been established pursuant to the 1972 Act and the provisions of Proposition 218. Improvements and Services Permitted Pursuant to the 1972 Act As generally defined by the 1972 Act and applicable to this District, improvements and the associated assessments may include one or more of the following: 1) The installation or planting of landscaping; 2) The installation or construction of statuary, fountains, and other ornamental structures and facilities; 3) The installation or construction of public lighting facilities including, but not limited to, street lights and traffic signals; 4) The installation of park or recreational improvements including, but not limited to, all of the following: a) Land preparation, such as grading, leveling, cutting and filling, sod, landscaping, irrigation systems, sidewalks, and drainage; b) Lights, playground equipment, play courts, and public restrooms; c) The acquisition of land for park, recreational, or open-space purposes; 5) The installation or construction of any facilities which are appurtenant to any of the foregoing or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance or servicing thereof; 6) The acquisition of any associated existing improvement; 7) The maintenance or servicing of any of the foregoing including the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, and servicing of any improvement including, but not limited to: a) Repair, removal, or replacement of all or any part of any improvements; b) Grading, clearing, removal of debris, the installation or construction of curbs, gutters, walls, sidewalks, or paving, or water, irrigation, drainage, or electrical facilities; c) Providing for the life, growth, health, and beauty of landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing, or treating for disease or injury; d) The removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris, and other solid waste; e) The cleaning, sandblasting, and painting of walls and other improvements to remove or cover graffiti; f) Electric current or energy, gas, or other illuminating agent for any public lighting facilities or for the lighting or operation of any other improvements; g) Water for the irrigation of any landscaping, the operation of any fountains, or the maintenance of any other improvements; 8) Incidental expenses associated with the improvements including, but not limited to: City of Palm Springs – Engineer’s Report Parkway Maintenance District No. 8, Vintage Palms Subject Fiscal Year: 2023 / 2024 _________________________________________________________________________________________________ City of Palm Springs, Parkway Maintenance District No. 8 – Engineer’s Report Page 5 a) The cost of preparation of the report, including plans, specifications, estimates, diagram, and assessment; b) The costs of printing, advertising, and the publishing, posting and mailing of notices; c) Compensation payable to the County for collection of assessments; d) Compensation of any engineer or attorney employed to render services; e) Any other expenses incidental to the construction, installation, or maintenance and servicing of the improvements; and, f) Costs associated with any elections held for the approval of a new or increased assessment. Landscaping Improvements The parkway improvements may include, but are not limited to, all landscaping material and facilities within the District. These improvements include ground cover, shrubs, trees, plants, irrigation and drainage systems, ornamental lighting structures and associated appurtenant facilities located within the District. In 2007, the entire east side of Avenida Caballeros parkway landscaping was removed and replaced, at the cost of Sun Cal – developer of the adjacent Avalon project. Pursuant to a Court ordered Settlement Agreement between the original developer (Trans West Housing) and representatives of homeowners within the Vintage Palms neighborhood, agreement included the developer’s obligation to revise the existing desert landscape improvements along the east side of Avenida Caballeros to be consistent with parkway landscaping improvements to be installed along the west side of Avenida Caballeros. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT A. GENERAL The 1972 Act permits the establishment of assessment districts by agencies for the purpose of providing certain public improvements, which include the construction, maintenance, and servicing of public lights, landscaping, parks, open space areas and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value: “The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district or District may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements.” The formula used for calculating assessments reflects the composition of the parcels and the improvements and services provided within the District to fairly apportion the costs based on estimated benefit to each parcel. In addition, Article XIII D requires that a parcel’s assessment may not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel. Article XIII D provides that only special benefits are assessable and the City must separate the general benefits from the special benefits. City of Palm Springs – Engineer’s Report Parkway Maintenance District No. 8, Vintage Palms Subject Fiscal Year: 2023 / 2024 _________________________________________________________________________________________________ City of Palm Springs, Parkway Maintenance District No. 8 – Engineer’s Report Page 6 B. BENEFIT ANALYSIS All improvements associated with this District have been identified as necessary, required and/or desired for the properties within the District to their full potential, consistent with the development plans. As such, these improvements would be necessary and required of individual property owners for the development of such properties, and the ongoing operation, servicing and maintenance of these improvements would be the financial obligation of those properties. Therefore, the improvements and the annual costs of maintenance and operation of the improvements are of direct and special benefit to the properties. The method of apportionment (method of assessment) is based on the premise that each assessed parcel within the District receives benefit from the improvements. The special benefits associated with the parkway improvements are specifically: ▪ Enhanced desirability of properties through association with the improvements; ▪ Improved aesthetic appeal of properties providing a positive representation of the area; ▪ Enhanced adaptation of the urban environment within the natural environment from adequate green space, open space areas and landscaping; ▪ Environmental enhancement through improved erosion resistance, dust and debris control, and fire prevention; ▪ Increased sense of pride in ownership of property within the District resulting from well- maintained improvements associated with the properties; and ▪ Enhanced environmental quality of the parcels by moderating temperatures, providing oxygenation and attenuating noise. All of the preceding special benefits contribute to a specific enhancement and desirability of each of the assessed parcels within the District. Although the improvements may include landscaping improvements and other amenities available or visible to the public at large, the maintenance of these improvements is only necessary for the properties within the District and are not required nor necessarily desired by any properties or developments outside the District boundary. Therefore, any public access or use of the improvements by others is incidental and there is no measurable general benefit to properties outside the District or to the public at large. C. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY The method of apportionment for the District calculates the receipt of special benefit from the respective improvements based on the actual land use of the parcels within the District. The special benefit received by each lot or parcel is equated to the overall land use of the parcel based on the parcel’s actual land use or proposed planned development, and is reliant upon the special benefit received from the improvements planned within the District. To identify and determine the special benefit to be received by each parcel, it is necessary to consider the entire scope of the District improvements as well as individual property development within the District. The costs associated with the improvements shall be fairly distributed among the parcels based upon the special benefit received by each parcel. The maintenance and operation of the landscaping improvements provides special benefit to all parcels within the District adjacent to the improvements. The total assessment was previously apportioned with 59% of the total District costs levied against the 62 single family lots within Tract 24853-1 and 41% of the total District costs levied against the remainder portion of Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 25864 consisting of approximately 55 acres of vacant land, (previously identified as two vacant parcels by Assessor’s Parcel Number 669-330-035 and 669-330-036). The apportionment was determined by the length of the adjacent landscaped City of Palm Springs – Engineer’s Report Parkway Maintenance District No. 8, Vintage Palms Subject Fiscal Year: 2023 / 2024 _________________________________________________________________________________________________ City of Palm Springs, Parkway Maintenance District No. 8 – Engineer’s Report Page 7 parkways, with the westerly landscaped parkway along Avenida Caballeros representing 41% of the overall length of landscaped parkways within the District. However, with the absorption of the westerly landscaped parkway along Avenida Caballeros for maintenance by the adjacent project, “Avalon”, the apportioned 41% of the District costs representing that portion of the District was eliminated and de-annexed from the District in fiscal year 2006/2007. Therefore, the apportioned 59% of the District costs, representing the remaining portion (easterly landscaped parkway along Avenida Caballeros and the landscaped parkway along San Rafael Drive) now represents 100% of the District costs beginning in fiscal year 2006/2007. The District costs will be equally apportioned to each parcel within Tract 24853-1 on a per lot unit basis. All lots are assessed the same amount as each is a single-family lot and receives equivalent benefit. D. ASSESSMENT FORMULA Any new or increased assessment requires certain noticing and meeting requirements by law. Prior to the passage of Proposition 218 (California Constitution Articles XIIIC and XIIID), legislative changes in the Brown Act defined a “new or increased assessment" to exclude certain conditions. These conditions included “any assessment that does not exceed an assessment formula or range of assessments previously adopted by the agency or approved by the voters in the area where the assessment is imposed." This definition and conditions were later confirmed through Senate Bill 919 (Proposition 218 implementing legislation). The purpose of establishing an Assessment Formula is to provide for reasonable increases and inflationary adjustment to annual assessments without requiring costly noticing and mailing procedures, which could add to the District costs and assessments. This District provides for an annual adjustment to the Maximum Assessment Rate based upon the Consumer Price Index for the Los Angeles-Orange-Riverside County Area. The Assessment Formula shall be applied to all future assessments within the District. Generally, if the proposed annual assessment for the current fiscal year is less than or equal to the calculated Maximum Assessment, then the proposed annual assessment is not considered an increased assessment. The Maximum Assessment is equal to the initial Assessment (approved by property owners within the District) adjusted annually based upon the Consumer Price Index. Beginning in fiscal year 2009/2010 and each fiscal year thereafter, the Maximum Assessment would be recalculated and a new Maximum Assessment established within the District. The Maximum Assessment is adjusted annually and is calculated independent of the District’s annual budget and proposed annual assessment. Any proposed annual assessment less than or equal to this Maximum Assessment is not considered an increased assessment, even if the proposed assessment is greater than the assessment applied in the prior fiscal year. Although the Maximum Assessment will increase each year, the actual assessment may remain unchanged. The Maximum Assessment adjustment is designed to establish a reasonable limit on assessments. The Maximum Assessment calculated each year does not require or facilitate an increase to the annual assessment and neither does it restrict assessments to the adjustment maximum amount. If the budget and assessment for the fiscal year do not require an increase, or the increase is less than the adjusted Maximum Assessment, then the required budget and assessment may be applied without additional property owner balloting. If the budget and assessments calculated requires an increase greater than the adjusted Maximum Assessment, then the assessment is considered an increased assessment and would be subject to balloting. City of Palm Springs – Engineer’s Report Parkway Maintenance District No. 8, Vintage Palms Subject Fiscal Year: 2023 / 2024 _________________________________________________________________________________________________ City of Palm Springs, Parkway Maintenance District No. 8 – Engineer’s Report Page 8 DISTRICT BUDGET A. DESCRIPTION OF BUDGET ITEMS For the purpose of estimating costs for the maintenance and servicing, actual costs are used where possible. But where actual maintenance experience is lacking, cost estimates will be used to determine costs, as follows: Parkway Landscape Maintenance: Includes maintenance labor, materials and equipment required to properly maintain the authorized improvements and services within the District. Water costs: The cost of irrigation water for the parkway landscaping to be maintained is based upon actual Desert Water Agency billings on publicly landscaped areas being maintained within the District. Electrical energy costs: Energy costs included are those necessary for the operation of irrigation controls and decorative (ornamental) landscape lighting improvements. Incidental costs: These are costs for special items, such as costs of levying the assessments with the County Tax Collector, anticipated utility rate increases, or other such costs, and are determined individually. Another Incidental Cost is the expense of Assessment Engineering services. This includes costs of performing annual assessment engineering, determining existing or estimated costs, retaining of consultants, preparation of the Engineer’s Report, and other related costs, such as publication of notices, mailings, etc. Another Incidental Cost is the County Assessor-Tax Collector’s charge of $25 per County assessment account plus $0.20 per levied parcel, to place the assessments on the tax rolls. This charge will be distributed between the benefit Districts. Miscellaneous: All cost estimates shall be rounded to the nearest dollar, except where specified differently above. The total amount to be levied on any parcel will be rounded to an even number to accommodate collection on the property tax bill in two equal installments. B. DISTRICT BUDGET This report has been prepared pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code) and Article XIIID, Section 4 of the California Constitution (Proposition 218). See next page. City of Palm Springs – Engineer’s Report Parkway Maintenance District No. 8, Vintage Palms Subject Fiscal Year: 2023 / 2024 _________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ City of Palm Springs, Parkway Maintenance District No. 8 – Engineer’s Report Page 9 B. DISTRICT BUDGET PARKWAY MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 ("VINTAGE PALMS") (Formed in 1990) A. FY 21-22 Past Actual Costs vs. Assessments Summary Account Surplus from previous FY = $ 12,178 Starting Budget = $ 22,504 Actual Costs = $ (14,016) Account Surplus / Deficit = $ 20,666 Assessment = $ 24,275 Estimated Costs = $ (13,233) Estimated Account Surplus / Deficit = $ 31,709 B. FY 22-23 Current Estimated Annual Costs Landscape Services $ (10,348) Southern California Edison $ - Desert Water Agency $ (2,678) Incidentals $ - Reserve Fund $ - Administration $ (869) Estimated Annual Costs: $ (13,894) C. FY 23-24 Future Estimated Assessment Estimated Future Cost = $ (13,894) Estimated Current FY Account Surplus = $ 31,709 Estimated Future Surplus / Deficit = $ 17,815 D. FY 23-24 Future Assessment Analysis Change in Consumer Price Index (∆ CPI) 3.823% Previous FY Maximum Allowable Assessment = $ 24,275 Maximum Allowable Assessment (Previous Max X ∆CPI) = $ 25,203 Proposed Assessment = → $ 17,814 (Assessment) Cost per parcel (based on 62 Parcels) = → $ 287.32 (Per Parcel) E. Two Year History: Actual Costs vs. Assessments Fiscal Year: FY 20-21 FY 21-22 Actual Costs: ($9,542) ($14,016) Assessment: $21,720 $22,504 F. Two Year History: Maximum Assessment Adjusted Max. Assessment FY 20-21 $21,720 Adjusted Max. Assessment FY 21-22 $22,504 Note: *CPI of "All Urban Consumers" for the Los Angeles-Orange-Riverside County, April CPI value. *Max approved assessment was $17,510 in FY 08/09, with a CPI annual inflator effective FY 09/10. City of Palm Springs – Engineer’s Report Parkway Maintenance District No. 8, Vintage Palms Subject Fiscal Year: 2023 / 2024 _________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ City of Palm Springs, Parkway Maintenance District No. 8 – Engineer’s Report Page 11 APPENDIX A - DISTRICT DIAGRAM The parcels within the Palm Springs Parkway Maintenance District No. 8 (“Vintage Palms”), are shown on the current Riverside County Assessor’s Parcel Map Book 669, Page 33, and Map Book 669, Page 52. The County Assessor’s Parcel Map along with the Assessment Roll constitutes the District Assessment Diagram. A copy of the Parkway Maintenance District No. 8 (“Vintage Palms”) boundary is shown on the following pages. City of Palm Springs – Engineer’s Report Parkway Maintenance District No. 8, Vintage Palms Subject Fiscal Year: 2023 / 2024 _________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ City of Palm Springs, Parkway Maintenance District No. 8 – Engineer’s Report Page 12 City of Palm Springs – Engineer’s Report Parkway Maintenance District No. 8, Vintage Palms Subject Fiscal Year: 2023 / 2024 _________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ City of Palm Springs, Parkway Maintenance District No. 8 – Engineer’s Report Page 13 City of Palm Springs – Engineer’s Report Parkway Maintenance District No. 8, Vintage Palms Subject Fiscal Year: 2023 / 2024 _________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ City of Palm Springs, Parkway Maintenance District No. 8 – Engineer’s Report Page 14 APPENDIX B - ASSESSMENT ROLL Parcel identification for each lot or parcel within the District shall be the parcel as shown on the Riverside County Secured Roll for the year in which this Report is prepared and reflective of the Assessor’s Parcel Map(s) associated with the Secured Roll. A listing of parcels proposed to be assessed within this District, along with the assessment amounts, is shown on the following table. City of Palm Springs – Engineer’s Report Parkway Maintenance District No. 8, Vintage Palms 669-522-028-6 $287.32 669-522-035-2 $287.32 TOTAL 669-522-026-4 $287.32 669-522-033-0 $287.32 669-522-027-5 $287.32 669-522-034-1 $287.32 FY 23-24 $17,813.84 669-522-031-8 $287.32 669-522-025-3 $287.32 669-522-032-9 $287.32 669-522-022-0 $287.32 669-522-029-7 $287.32 669-522-023-1 $287.32 669-522-030-7 $287.32 669-521-021-6 $287.32 669-521-024-9 $287.32 669-521-022-7 $287.32 669-521-023-8 $287.32 669-522-024-2 $287.32 669-522-006-6 669-522-002-2 669-522-003-3 669-521-027-2 $287.32 669-522-020-8 $287.32 $287.32 669-522-018-7 $287.32 669-522-019-8 $287.32 $287.32 $287.32 $287.32 $287.32 $287.32 669-522-005-5 669-521-011-7 $287.32 669-521-012-8 $287.32 669-521-013-9 $287.32 669-521-014-0 669-522-021-9 $287.32 669-521-016-2 $287.32 669-521-019-5 $287.32 669-521-020-5 669-521-017-3 $287.32 669-521-018-4 $287.32 669-521-015-1 669-522-008-8 669-522-009-9 669-522-010-9 669-522-011-0 669-522-012-1 $287.32 $287.32 $287.32 $287.32 669-522-016-5 $287.32 669-522-017-6 669-522-013-2 669-522-014-3 669-522-015-4 $287.32 $287.32 $287.32 $287.32 $287.32 $287.32 669-521-010-6 $287.32 $287.32 669-521-004-1 $287.32 $287.32 669-521-005-2 $287.32 669-521-006-3 669-521-007-4 $287.32 669-521-008-5 $287.32 669-521-009-6 $287.32 669-522-001-1 669-522-004-4 669-522-007-7 RIVERSIDE COUNTY ASSESSMENT ROLL PARKWAY MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 ("VINTAGE PALMS") FUND NO. 68-2624 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER ASSESSMENT ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER ASSESSMENT $287.32 $287.32 669-521-025-0 669-521-002-9 $287.32 669-521-003-0 $287.32 $287.32 669-521-026-1 $287.32 669-521-001-8 $287.32 City of Palm Springs, Parkway Maintenance District No. 8 - Engineer’s Report Page 15