HomeMy WebLinkAboutNon Agenda ItemFrom:Grace Garner
To:City Clerk
Subject:FW: Fractional Home Ownership
Date:Thursday, May 4, 2023 9:41:58 AM
From: Stephen Edelstein <sgedelstein@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 3, 2023 6:01 PM
To: Grace Garner <Grace.Garner@palmspringsca.gov>
Subject: Fractional Home Ownership
NOTICE: This message originated outside of The City of Palm Springs -- DO NOT CLICK on links or open
attachments unless you are sure the content is safe.
Hi Grace-- We are voting residents of Palm Springs and are
extremely concerned over fractional home ownership that has
crept into our city. Companies like Pacaso, Cohana, and the
many more that are sure to develop, (if the City allows), have
nothing beneficial to offer Palm Springs. Their effect is to
degrade neighborhoods by their nature of different owners
taking possession for 2 weeks, leaving to allow other owners
arriving for another two weeks etc. The stability of our
neighborhoods depends on owners (or long term renters),
knowing and relating to each other. Fractional ownership is
the antithesis of this.
We beseech you and the other council members to do the
right thing and to protect our neighborhoods and our city by
not allowing this type of business to take place in our
residential neighborhoods.
Thank you for your attention,
Stephen & Roberta Edelstein
201 Camino Norte
04/27/2023
Public Comment
Non Agenda Item
From:Christy Holstege
To:City Clerk
Subject:Fwd: Fractional Home Ownership
Date:Wednesday, May 3, 2023 7:58:01 PM
Christy Gilbert Holstege, Esq.
Councilmember
District 4
City of Palm Springs
Begin forwarded message:
From: Stephen Edelstein <sgedelstein@gmail.com>
Date: May 3, 2023 at 6:29:06 PM PDT
To: Christy Holstege <Christy.Holstege@palmspringsca.gov>
Subject: Fractional Home Ownership
NOTICE: This message originated outside of The City of Palm Springs -- DO NOT CLICK on links or
open attachments unless you are sure the content is safe.
Dear Councilwoman Holstege-
We are voting residents of Palm Springs and are deeply concerned over
fractional home ownership that has crept into our city. We feel that
companies like Pacaso, Cohana, and the many more that are sure to
develop, if allowed, have nothing beneficial to offer Palm Springs. Their
effect is to degrade neighborhoods by their nature of different owners
taking possession for a short period of time only to leave to allow other
owners to have their turn etc. The stability of our neighborhoods depend
on owners or long term renters knowing and relating to each other.
Fractional ownership is the antithesis of this. We beseech you and other
council members to put a stop to fractional home ownership. We ask you
to do the right thing and protect our neighborhoods and our city by not
allowing this type of business to take place in our residential
neighborhoods.
Thank you for your consideration,
Stephen & Roberta Edelstein
201 Camino Norte
04/27/2023
Public Comment
Non Agenda Item
From:City of Palm Springs
To:City Clerk; City Clerk
Subject:*NEW SUBMISSION* Submit Public Comment to the City of Palm Springs
Date:Saturday, April 29, 2023 11:58:38 AM
Submit Public Comment to the City of Palm Springs
Submission #:2401060
IP Address:172.58.31.71
Submission Date:04/29/2023 11:58
Survey Time:5 minutes, 16 seconds
You have a new online form submission.
Note: all answers displaying "*****" are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login.
Full Name/Nombre
Rob Winrader
City of Residence/Ciudad de residencia
Palm Springs,
Phone (optional) /Teléfono (opcional)
3107703868
Email (optional/opcional)
rwinrader@gmail.com
Your Comments/Sus comentarios
I’ve waited 2 months for the City’s paper shredding event that was scheduled for today, Saturday, April 29, 2023.
Staff told me that it was best to show up after 10 AM to avoid the initial rush so I showed up at 11 AM with 3 file
boxes….only to be directed to an new location on Ramon across from the car wash. Cars were queued dangerously
onto Ramon with no traffic control. I was informed that it was a PS Realtor Association shredding event and they
weren’t able to accommodate any more of the City’s constituents….what a fiasco! The City should reschedule
another event ASAP…what a disappointment and demonstration of bureaucracy at its worst!
Thank you,
City of Palm Springs
This is an automated message generated by Granicus. Please do not reply directly to this email.
04/27/2023
Public Comment
Non Agenda Item
From:Grace Garner
To:City Clerk
Subject:FW: Pacaso
Date:Wednesday, May 3, 2023 1:36:14 PM
-----Original Message-----
From: Roger Neustadter <rogernn@aol.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 3, 2023 11:28 AM
To: Grace Garner <Grace.Garner@palmspringsca.gov>; Jeffrey Bernstein <Jeffrey.Bernstein@palmspringsca.gov>;
Ron deHarte <Ron.deHarte@palmspringsca.gov>; Christy Holstege <Christy.Holstege@palmspringsca.gov>; Lisa
Middleton <Lisa.Middleton@palmspringsca.gov>
Subject: Pacaso
NOTICE: This message originated outside of The City of Palm Springs -- DO NOT CLICK on links or open
attachments unless you are sure the content is safe.
Palm Springs Mayor and City Councilors,
I ask you to vote to deny Pacaso’s proposal to expand their fractional ownership model. I believe that their model is
inconsistent with the single family home residential zoning in our neighborhoods. It would significantly negatively
impact the character and quality of life of our neighborhoods.
As a homeowner, I see no discernible benefits to residents from allowing Panasonic and similar fractional ownership
firms to operate in the city. Having a fractional ownership home operating as a neighbor would reduce the value of
my home as well as reduce the pleasure of living in a peaceful, regulated residential neighborhood.
Please vote to ban future fractional ownership in Palm Springs,
Thank you,
Roger Neustadter
Security chairperson
Old Las Palmas Neighbor Organization
Sent from my iPad
04/27/2023
Public Comment
Non Agenda Item
From:Christy Holstege
To:City Clerk
Subject:Fwd: Pacaso and the Shared Home Ownership Model
Date:Wednesday, May 3, 2023 12:37:56 PM
Attachments:VLPNO Shared Home Ownership.pdf
Christy Gilbert Holstege, Esq.
Councilmember
District 4
City of Palm Springs
Begin forwarded message:
From: Kevin Comer <kcomerprivate@gmail.com>
Date: May 3, 2023 at 11:26:25 AM PDT
To: Grace Garner <Grace.Garner@palmspringsca.gov>, Jeffrey Bernstein
<Jeffrey.Bernstein@palmspringsca.gov>, Christy Holstege
<Christy.Holstege@palmspringsca.gov>, ron@rondeharte.com, Lisa Middleton
<Lisa.Middleton@palmspringsca.gov>, Scott Stiles
<Scott.Stiles@palmspringsca.gov>, sipper1@me.com, Denise Goolsby
<Denise.Goolsby@palmspringsca.gov>
Cc: Patsy Marino <pmarino@san.rr.com>, Kermit Ferrer <Kferrer@banet.net>,
Joe Vassallo <joe@greenjoe.com>, Gustav Swanson
<gustavswanson@gmail.com>, Steve Orr <steve_orr@ymail.com>, Vince Tavani
<vincetavani@hotmail.com>
Subject: Pacaso and the Shared Home Ownership Model
NOTICE: This message originated outside of The City of Palm Springs -- DO NOT CLICK on links or
open attachments unless you are sure the content is safe.
Good morning,
This email is addressed to the Palm Springs City Council, the City Manager, and
ONE PS. Attached please find a letter from the Vista Las Palmas Neighborhood
Organization. We represent the 420 households in the Vista Las Palmas
Neighborhood. We are asking that the City of Palm Springs adopt a firm posture
against the shared home ownership model, to discontinue any discussions with
Pacaso and other shared ownership operators, and to take the necessary steps to
revoke the deeds previously issued to shared owners. We are available to discuss
this at your convenience and to provide additional input. We thank you for your
attention to this matter and look forward to resolution.
Sincerely, the VLPNO Board
04/27/2023
Public Comment
Non Agenda Item
May 3, 2023
To:
The City of Palm Springs,
Offices of the Palm Springs Mayor and City Council,
Mayor Grace Elena Garner,
Mayor pro tem Jeffrey Bernstein,
Councilmember Ron deHarte,
Councilmember Christy Holstege,
Councilmember Lisa Middleton,
and ONE-PS:
The Vista Las Palmas Neighborhood Organization (VLPNO) is contacting you regarding
the model of shared home ownership being utilized by Pacaso and likely other future
operators, as well as specific discussions between the City of Palm Springs and Pacaso
that are currently underway.
The VLPNO Board voted unanimously at our April meeting to ask the City of Palm
Springs, its elected representatives and ONE-PS to vote in favor of the complete
elimination and blockage of the fractional property ownership model used by Pacaso
and any other entity to operate within the City of Palm Springs. In addition, the VLPNO
Board respectively requests the City undertake any necessary actions to revoke the
deeds currently issued by/to Pacaso and others and to the fractional owners of the single-
family homes within City boundaries.
VLPNO believes the single family home ownership model which for generations has been
the mainstay of single family home residential zoning throughout our country is under
attack from all directions. This is especially true in our own neighborhood. The home
ownership model utilized by these fractional real estate agencies such as Pacaso is just
another example of this assault.
1. The very concept of residential, single-family home zoning is diametrically
opposed to the multi-family ownership model used by Pacaso’s time-
share/tenancy in common concept. Pacaso and other real estate agencies sell
fractional ownership in homes zoned for single-family use to as many as groups of
8 homeowners. By definition, 8 homeowners is not a single-family homeowner.
Cities across the country have zoning for hotels and multi-family use.
2. The Pacaso model is more suited to commercial zoning. Pacaso converts
houses into LLCs. Pacaso then sells shares of these ‘corporate’ houses to multiple
investors. The Pacaso model makes these properties part of a corporation.
However even then it is not a direct match. Single-family zoning is meant to be
just that: use for a single family. The inclusion of multi-family ownership in single-
family zoned areas will irrevocably change the character of those neighborhoods
04/27/2023
Public Comment
Non Agenda Item
– making them less of a residential neighborhood and more of a commercial
zone.
3. The costs associated with fractional ownership homes outweigh any
benefits. Any financial benefit from property taxes and potential tourist type
spending in Palm Springs would be offset by increased infrastructure usage, and
the degradation of neighborhood quality of life. Palm Springs does not receive any
TOT taxes from fractional ownership homes homes. On the surface, the fractional
ownership model seems like a ruse to circumvent TOT taxes and STR
rules/regulations. Furthermore, there is no way to prevent fractional ownership
homes from being leased to non-owners. (Thereby losing potential TOT revenue.)
There is no marketing benefit to the City or its residents for increasing the density
in residential neighborhoods: in fact the opposite is true. The failure of the City to
protect single-family homeownership and the quality of life in single family home
neighborhoods will be viewed as a negative. No income and no marketing benefit
equals no upside, only downside.
3. We are aware that the City is considering an appeasement, or a negotiation,
whereby the City will grant approval subject to certain conditions including an
agreement to abide by the rules governing short-term rentals. We want to be very
clear on this point. There should be NO NEGOTIATION between the City and
Pacaso.
4. Anecdotally we all know that many of our long-time neighbors and/or friends
are leaving or have already left Palm Springs for other cities in the desert. Many
are or have been quite clear about their reasons for doing so. Other cities in the
Coachella Valley are doing more to protect and enhance the quality of life than
Palm Springs is doing. Allowing fractional ownership within Palm Springs is one
more step away from our desirable residential character and one step closer
toward commercialization.
We are also keenly aware of concerns that Pacaso might sue the City of Palm Springs if
its proposals are rejected. We as residents of the City of Palm Springs will not be
intimidated. The City of Palm Springs should not back down from doing what’s right for
our residents just because of litigation threats. Many other cities in our desert have
already voted to decline Pacaso’s ability to operate within their boundaries entirely. We’re
asking our City to do the same.
Sincerely,
The Vista Las Palmas Neighborhood Organization (VLPNO)
Patsy Marino: VLPNO Chair
1717 E Vista Chino A7-252
Palm Springs, CA 92262
vlpno@yahoo.com
04/27/2023
Public Comment
Non Agenda Item
From:Christy Holstege
To:City Clerk
Subject:Fwd: Pacaso
Date:Wednesday, May 3, 2023 12:21:29 PM
Christy Gilbert Holstege, Esq.
Councilmember
District 4
City of Palm Springs
Begin forwarded message:
From: Roger Neustadter <rogernn@aol.com>
Date: May 3, 2023 at 11:28:27 AM PDT
To: Grace Garner <Grace.Garner@palmspringsca.gov>, Jeffrey Bernstein
<Jeffrey.Bernstein@palmspringsca.gov>, Ron deHarte
<Ron.deHarte@palmspringsca.gov>, Christy Holstege
<Christy.Holstege@palmspringsca.gov>, Lisa Middleton
<Lisa.Middleton@palmspringsca.gov>
Subject: Pacaso
NOTICE: This message originated outside of The City of Palm Springs -- DO
NOT CLICK on links or open attachments unless you are sure the content is safe.
Palm Springs Mayor and City Councilors,
I ask you to vote to deny Pacaso’s proposal to expand their fractional ownership
model. I believe that their model is inconsistent with the single family home
residential zoning in our neighborhoods. It would significantly negatively impact
the character and quality of life of our neighborhoods.
As a homeowner, I see no discernible benefits to residents from allowing
Panasonic and similar fractional ownership firms to operate in the city. Having a
fractional ownership home operating as a neighbor would reduce the value of my
home as well as reduce the pleasure of living in a peaceful, regulated residential
neighborhood.
Please vote to ban future fractional ownership in Palm Springs,
Thank you,
Roger Neustadter
Security chairperson
Old Las Palmas Neighbor Organization
04/27/2023
Public Comment
Non Agenda
Sent from my iPad
04/27/2023
Public Comment
Non Agenda
From:Jeffrey Bernstein
To:City Clerk
Subject:Fwd: Pedestrian Plan
Date:Sunday, April 23, 2023 10:01:57 AM
Thank you!
Jeffrey
Jeffrey Bernstein
Mayor Pro Tem, Councilmember
City of Palm Springs
442-305-9942
Jeffrey.Bernstein@palmspringsca.gov
Begin forwarded message:
From: "Nancy Kless" <nancykless@verizon.net>
Subject: Pedestrian Plan
Date: April 20, 2023 at 2:11:23 PM PDT
To: <Jeffrey.Bernstein@palmspringsca.gov>
Cc: "'Francisco Jaime'" <Francisco.Jaime@palmspringsca.gov>, "'MICHAEL MOSCA'" <michaelmosca@me.com>, <david@davidmelancon.com>,
<jduesing@andrew.cmu.edu>, <ejmejm@hotmail.com>, <rogerq@sonic.net>, <natsnana@yahoo.com>, "'Don Yager'" <donandrick@gmail.com>,
<juliewarrenpsca@gmail.com>, <genemosc@yahoo.com>
Reply-To: <nancykless@verizon.net>
NOTICE: This message originated outside of The City of Palm Springs -- DO NOT CLICK on links or open attachments unless you are sure the content is safe.
Hello,
I attended yesterday’s Oasis del Sol Neighborhood Annual Meeting and asked you about the pedestrian controlled signal at Sunrise & Tamarisk which was included as a
recommendation (with low priority) in the City’s 2021 Pedestrian Plan.
I’ve been in touch off and on with Francisco Jaime, Senior Civil Engineer, and he has been very responsive. You confirmed yesterday what he has been telling me consistently…
that due to its low priority there is no projected date for implementation of the recommended signal at that corner, and it seems it won’t be scheduled any time soon.
It appears that the pedestrian fatality at that intersection wasn’t sufficient to move the project ahead relative to its priority. My husband and I are seniors and walk our dog,
Louie, to the park every day when we stay at our condo in Sunrise Oasis. Walking to the signalized crosswalk at Tachevah is just not feasible given the distance (the park is less
than a mile away & it adds an extra 1.5 miles to the round trip). I’m hoping that we can get Oasis del Sol Community members involved to ask the City to reconsider, so that we
can walk directly to Ruth Hardy Park without literally running across Sunrise & risking our lives. Those cars really zoom by!
I would appreciate any advice as to how to move forward with asking the City to act more quickly to install a signalized cross walk at Sunrise & Tamarisk. Please forward this email
to any interested parties including officers and members of the Oasis del Sol Neighborhood Association (I reviewed the Facebook page but couldn't find email addresses).
It was great meeting you and I’m so pleased that you live in our neighborhood. (Note we are not here full time, but we love Palm Springs and come very often from Santa
Monica…weather permitting.)
Best,
Nancy Kless
310-890-4266
04/27/2023
Public Comment
Non Agenda Item
Karina Quintanilla
Gina Nestande
Jan Harnik
Evan Trubee
Dear Mayor Kathleen Kelly:
I am greatly concerned about the current trajectory certain California cities (Los Angeles, San Diego, and
San Jose) elected and non-elected officials are pursuing to make these towns a Smart City. Although
Smart Cities are being touted as “Sustainability” and “Equitable” and “Convenience,” Smart Cities are not
being accurately described for what they really are - they are mass surveillance cities, which remove any
sense of individual privacy. In fact, a euphemism for “smart cities” could be called “surveillance.” This
means that these California cities will deploy surveillance technologies powered by automatic data
mining, facial recognition, and other forms of artificial intelligence at a scale never seen before. As you
know urban surveillance is a multibillion-dollar industry, with these cities readily handing out money to
contractors and nonprofits and creating new divisions in the city government to build the smart city
industry and maintain it. While “smart cities” have been described by proponents with soothing promises
of greener energy solutions, lower-friction mobility, and safer streets, the honest fact is these cities will be
supercharged surveillance that encroach on free speech, privacy, and data protection. And, the facial
recognition and related technologies at the scale that smart cities will employ are extremely worrisome.
Moreover, the deployment and integration of surveillance technologies, such as sensors and biometric
data collection systems - electronic, infrared, thermal, and LIDAR sensors form the basis of the smart
grid. They do everything from operating streetlights to optimizing parking and traffic flow to detect
crime. Therefore, these cities will become a veritable thicket of video surveillance. Identity collection
devices will become commonplace, exploding across public and private spaces.
Can you imagine a world where you’re watched every second? I hope you don’t want this for our city.
While we do have these technologies now, we don’t have them at the scale that Smart Cities employ. I am
asking that you dismiss any of these forms of surveillance in our city.. I am asking that you remember a
time when privacy was valued. I am including an article that I ask you to read. I know that many of the
council members in other cities are approving everything with a rubber stamp that has to do with Smart
Cities, but I wonder if they are really considering the future they are creating for us residents?
I am expressing my extreme concern about these other California cities and am asking that you and the
council members not make Palm Desert a Smart City. I know I’m just a regular person, but I needed to
express myself to you. You appear to be very reasonable and “Holistic. Surely, it cannot be your dream to
bring this massive surveillance state to Palm Desert. Smart Cities are the “shiny new button” that are
being touted as the best thing around. However, there appears little thought for the implications smart
cities bring and nobody would vote for digital prisons if they understood how vast the surveillance will be
in smart cities. As previously stated, I know that money is being handed out like water and many of those
who represent us are caught up in the euphoria of being on this new trend, but I can’t help but think this
Pandora’s Box is going to bring great regrets in the future. I’ve done considerable research on this, using
my own free time because I care about the future of Palm Desert and the Coachella Valley. I don’t have
any lobbyists or campaign donations to rush after - I’m just a concerned person.
Thanks for listening. Thank you for your service. I’ve cc’d the City Council Members on this email.
Best wishes,
Julie Klein (Palm Desert resident)
://foreignpolicy.com/2021/04/17/smart-cities-surveillance-privacy-digital-threats-internet-of-things-5g/htt
ps
04/27/2023
Public Comment
Non Agenda Item
From:Jeffrey Bernstein
To:City Clerk
Subject:Fwd: Smart Cities
Date:Sunday, April 23, 2023 10:09:20 AM
Attachments:Mayor City Council Palm Desert Smart Cities.docx.pdf
Thank you!
Jeffrey
Jeffrey Bernstein
Mayor Pro Tem, Councilmember
City of Palm Springs
442-305-9942
Jeffrey.Bernstein@palmspringsca.gov
Begin forwarded message:
From: Julie Klein <chrisjulieklein@gmail.com>
Subject: Smart Cities
Date: April 19, 2023 at 2:38:39 PM PDT
To: Grace.Garner@palmspringsca.gov
Cc: Jeffrey.Bernstein@palmspringsca.gov, Ron.deHarte@palmspringsca.gov,
Christy.Holstege@palmspringsca.gov, Lisa.Middleton@palmspringsca.gov
NOTICE: This message originated outside of The City of Palm Springs -- DO NOT CLICK on links or
open attachments unless you are sure the content is safe.
Hello,
I sent the attached letter to Palm Desert because I am a resident there. However, I
believe it to be relevant to all Coachella Valley cities so I am forwarding it to you.
Thank you for your time.
-Julie Klein
04/27/2023
Public Comment
Non Agenda Item
From:Thomas Ledwith
To:Grace Garner; Lisa Middleton; Christy Holstege; City Clerk
Subject:Mesquite Owners
Date:Monday, April 24, 2023 10:45:53 AM
NOTICE: This message originated outside of The City of Palm Springs -- DO NOT CLICK on links or open
attachments unless you are sure the content is safe.
To All ,
I am writing to you let you know that I have a major concern regarding the Vacant Mesquite Golf course . The so
called owner has not furnished any sketches, photographs, renderings or a business plan regarding the OLT
"Preserve to MCC Hoa board or our attorneys . We are extremely worried about the the homeless and brush fires .
The HOA Would like to know where Ms.Holstage , stands on this issue . This in the heart of her district. As an
owner at the Mesquite Country Club I am in complete "opposition " of Jane Garrison and OLT preserve .
Thank you for reading my email.
Sincerely,
Thomas M Ledwith
2701 E Mesquite Ave
Palm Springs,Ca .
Sent from my T-Mobile 5G LTE device
04/27/2023
Public Comment
Non Agenda Item
From:Anita K.
To:Grace Garner
Cc:Alyssa Chavez; Christy Holstege; City Clerk; CityManager; Jeffrey Bernstein; Lisa Middleton; Ron deHarte; Scott
Stiles
Subject:Mesquite Golf Course planned Conversion
Date:Wednesday, April 19, 2023 6:43:27 PM
NOTICE: This message originated outside of The City of Palm Springs -- DO NOT CLICK on links or open attachments
unless you are sure the content is safe.
April 19, 2023
Grace Elena Garner, Mayor
Palm Springs, California
The Honorable Grace Garner:
Re: Proposed Golf Course conversion – Mesquite Golf Course, Palm Springs
I am writing to the Palm Springs Manager and Council to express my concerns on the current state of
the Mesquite Golf Course. My biggest concern is that it appears that the Oswit Land Trust is not
following the Golf Course Conversion Ordinance, and I want to ensure that this is followed. The Golf
Course Conversion Ordinance has been ignored, and there has been absolutely no consultation with
the impacted residents immediately bordering the Mesquite Golf Course by Oswit, and that the
Conversion guidelines are being ignored by Oswit. This is not acceptable.
I was very encouraged when you first put in the Golf Course Conversion Ordinance a few years ago,
but now am very discouraged that it is not being followed in this circumstance. Why is this
happening?
I understand that Oswit is planning to convert the Prescott Preserve back to a desert/wildlife
preserve, and encourage the breeding of coyotes and other predatory animals in the heart of Palm
Springs. My second largest concern is the safety of the adjacent residents and their children/pets.
Regarding the coyotes, encouraging birth and life in the middle of Palm Springs is not safe, period.
Coyotes will become territorial of their home, and will begin to attack more and more. In fact, I
previously witnessed a coyote attack, and kill, a large egret from the pond on the former golf course
right in front of me. This was very disturbing. Is this something you want the residents and visitors
to Palm Springs to remember about your city?
Coyotes have always used the Mesquite Golf Course as a corridor, but by encouraging breeding you
are encouraging them to stop and take up residence. I don’t believe the Wildlife Conservation Board
and authorities, and the City, wants this to happen.
Also, the weeds that are growing, and now dying, in the former golf course along Farrell and the bike
path are not being cut. Optically, this looks really bad and I don’t believe it is the impression you
want to give to Palm Spring residents and tourists.
04/27/2023
Public Comment
Non Agenda Item
This property that was formerly the Mesquite Golf Course is extremely important to Palm Springs
given its location in the City. You, as leaders of our city, have a wonderful opportunity to make sure
this conversion is done properly, with all the appropriate consultation. There are many residents
affected by this change, and they should be consulted with any proposed plans being brought
forward by Oswit before anything is done. All I ask is that proper due diligence is done, which I
believe the Golf Course Conversion Ordinance provides if followed, and that the existing litigation
before the Courts between the Mesquite HOA and Oswit is resolved before any approvals are given.
Finally, I would like to thank you all for your service to this city, it is much appreciated!
Regards,
Anita Kuper, Owner, Mesquite Country Club Condos
780-440-2300
04/27/2023
Public Comment
Non Agenda Item
From:City of Palm Springs
To:City Clerk; City Clerk
Subject:*NEW SUBMISSION* Submit Public Comment to the City of Palm Springs
Date:Saturday, April 15, 2023 11:25:16 AM
Submit Public Comment to the City of Palm Springs
Submission #:2368452
IP Address:72.132.189.197
Submission Date:04/15/2023 11:25
Survey Time:5 minutes, 30 seconds
You have a new online form submission.
Note: all answers displaying "*****" are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login.
Full Name/Nombre
Michael Alcenius
City of Residence/Ciudad de residencia
Palm Springs,
Phone (optional) /Teléfono (opcional)
2028413810
Email (optional/opcional)
malcenius@gmail.com
Your Comments/Sus comentarios
Greetings. Prior to coming to conclusions about permitting PACASO, please consider the negative impact that the
organization has had on other communities (Montecito/Santa Barbara, Newport Beach, etc.). Not the income
gained but the social impact on the community and how PACASO has negatively affected the demographic.
Thank you,
City of Palm Springs
This is an automated message generated by Granicus. Please do not reply directly to this email.
04/10/2023
Public Comment
Non Agenda