HomeMy WebLinkAbout24997I
I
RESOLUTION NO. 24997
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PALM SPRINGS. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CASE 5.1521
GPA, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT, TO AMEND THE
CURRENT LAND USE DESIGNATION OF 'INDUSTRIAL'
(IND) TO VERY LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL' (VLDR)
AND ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
FOR THE SUBDIVISION OF A 2.53- ACRE LOT INTO EIGHT
(8) SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PARCELS FOR
FUTURE DEVELOPMENT AT 2700 EAST ALEJO ROAD,
SECTION 12.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS DOES HEREBY FIND
AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, AG Land Investments, LLC, (the 'Applicant") has filed Case 5.1521
General Plan Amendment (GPA), Case 5.1521 CZ Change of Zone (CZ), Case TTM
38049, Tentative Tract Map (TTM), and Case 7.1645 AMM Administrative Minor
Modification (AMM) applications in accordance with Sections 94.07.00 (Change of Zone),
94.06.01 (Minor Modifications), and 9.60 (Subdivision of Land - General Provision) of the
Plan Springs Zoning and Municipal Codes to subdivide a 2.53-acre undeveloped lot into
eight (8) single-family residential lots for future development at 2700 East Alejo Road;
and
WHEREAS, the current General Plan land use and zone designations of the
project site are 'Industrial' (IND) and 'M-1-P' (Planned Research and Development Park),
respectively; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has requested a General Plan Amendment (GPA) to
change the land use designation from 'Industrial' (IND) to 'Very Low Density Residential'
(VLDR); and '
WHEREAS, the applicant has requested a Change of Zone (CZ) from the current
'Planned Research and Development Park' (M-1-P) to 'Single-Family Residential' (R-1-
C); and
WHEREAS, the applicant has requested a Tentative Tract Map (TTM) to subdivide
the existing 2.53-acre undeveloped lot into eight (8) single-family residential parcels; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has requested an Administrative Minor Modification
(AMM) to reduce the Code-required minimum lot width from 130 feet to 117 feet for Lot 4
and Lot 8; and
I
Resolution No. 24997
Page 2
WHEREAS, on February 23, 2022, a public hearing on Case 5.1521 GPA/CZ,
Case TTM 38049, and Case 7.1645 AMM was held by the Planning Commission in
accordance with applicable law. The Planning Commission voted 5-2 (Absent: Ervin &
Moruzzi) to recommend approval to the City Council subject to conditions.
WHEREAS, on March 24, 2022, a public hearing on Case 5.1521 GPA/C2, Case
TTM 38049,. and Case 7.1645 AMM were held by the City Council in accordance with
applicable law.
WHEREAS, the proposed project is considered a "project" pursuant to the terms
of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), and an Environmental Assessment
has been prepared for this project and has been distributed for public review and
comment in accordance with CEQA; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has carefully reviewed and considered all of the
evidence presented in connection with the meeting on the Project, including but not
limited to the staff report, all environmental data including the environmental assessment
prepared for the project and all written and oral testimony presented.
WHEREAS, State of California Governmental Code Sections 65350 - 65362,
outlines the procedures and requirements for Cities and Counties to create and amend
their General Plan. There are, however, no specific findings for a General Plan
Amendment. The City Council has evaluated the requested GPA based upon the
following:
• Compatibility of the proposed use with adjacent land uses
• Development patterns of the neighborhood.
• Applicable Goals, Policies and Actions of the General Plan.
The City Council specifically finds as follows:
1. Findings of Compatibiiity of the proposed iand use designation with existing
adjacent land uses.
The project proposes to change the current General Plan land use designation of
IND (Industrial) to VLDR (Very Low Density Residential) for future single-family
residential use. The City Council finds that the proposed VLDR land use
designation is compatible with the adjacent land uses, particularly to the existing
single-family residences to the west that are also located within the VLDR
designation area. The approval of the General Plan Amendment would allow
further expansion of the residential area.
I
I
I
I
I
Resolution No. 24997
Page 3
2. Findings of consistency with development patterns in the neighborhood.
Policy LU 6.2 of the General Plan Land Use Element encourages new residential
infill development projects (Palm Springs 2007 General Plan, page 2-27).
Additionally. Housing Element Policy HS1.1 states as follows:
"Provide adequate residential sites to accommodate and encourage a broad range
of housing opportunities."
The General Plan Amendment will allow the addition of new single-family
residences to the existing residential neighborhood to the west that was
established around 1960. Hence, the General Plan Amendment is consistent with
the development pattern of the neighborhood and meets this requirement.
3. Consistency with Goals, Policies and Action Items of the General Plan.
The approval of the General Plan Amendment would allow future development of
eight (8) single-family residences. Policy LU 6.2 of the Land Use Element
encourages new residential infill development (Palm Springs 2007 General Plan,
page 2-27), and the General Plan Amendment will help achieve the goal.
Additionally, the proposed project allows the City to achieve Goal LU 1 of the Land
n Use Element which states as follows:
"Establish a balanced pattern of land uses that complements the pattern and
character of existing uses, offers opportunities for the intensification of key targeted
sites, minimizes adverse environmental impacts, and has positive economic
results" (Palm Springs 2007 General Plan, page 2-20).
The proposed single-family residential use complements the existing single-family
residences to the west. The project site has remained undeveloped, and the in-fill
development of eight (8) new single-family residences will deliver positive
economic impacts to the City.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS DOES HEREBY
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the foregoing Recitals are true and correct and are incorporated
herein by this reference.
I
Resolution No. 24997
Page 4
SECTION 2. A Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) has been completed in
compliance with CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City's CEQA Guidelines.
The City Council finds that, with the incorporation of mitigation measures, the General
Plan Amendment will have a less than significant impact on the environment. The City
Council independently reviewed and considered the information contained in the MND
prior to its review of this Project and the MND reflects the City Council's independent
judgment and analysis. .Therefore, the City Council hereby adopts the MND for this
Project.
SECTION 3. That the City Council hereby approves Case 5.1521 GPA to amend
the current General Plan land use designation from 'Industrial' (IND) to 'Very Low Density
Residential' (VLDR) for the subdivision of a 2.53-acre lot into eight (8) single-family
residential parcels for future development at 2700 East Alejo Road. The General Plan
land use map shall be updated to reflect said amendment.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY THE PALM SPRINGS CITY
COUNCIL THIS 24^^^ DAY OF MARCH 2022.
I
JUSTIN CLIFTON
CITY MANAGER
ATTEST:
r\
I
MONIQiyE M. LOMELI, CMC
INTERIM CITY CLERK
I
I
I
I
Resolution No. 24997
Page 5
CERTIFICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.
CITY OF PALM SPRINGS )
1, MONIQUE M. LOMELI, Interim City Clerk of the City of Palm Springs, hereby
certify that Resolution No. 24997 is a full, true and correct copy, and was duly adopted at
a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Palm Springs on March 24, 2022, by
the following vote:
AYES: Counciimembers Kors, Woods, Mayor Pro Tem Garner, and Mayor
Middleton
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
RECUSED; Councilmember Holstege
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the
City of Palm Springs, California, this day of
MONpUETVl. LOMELI, CMC
INTERIM CITY CLERK