Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPresentation - Item 3B Boards and Commissions 2022-04-21REVIEW OF CITY BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS: April 21, 2022, City Council Meeting CITY OF PALM SPRINGS CITY OF PALM SPRINGS Visioning Sessions •Two Sessions held Nov 20th & 30th 2021 •Primary means of setting future priorities •Identify Targeted Process Improvements CITY OF PALM SPRINGS Process Improvement •Looked at life cycle of decision making •Identified multiple role players: residents, stakeholders, external partners, City departments, committees, commissions •Targeted improvements across the cycle of decision making for all role players •Some changes are already implemented CITY OF PALM SPRINGS Challenges •Commission structures and authority vary significantly •Some lack strategic direction provided by City Council •Confusion about roles and responsibilities •Lack of on-boarding and training •Lack of integration and communication Opportunities •Streamline Commission structures •Review, amend and clarify roles and responsibilities •Integrate Commissions in priority setting •Expand communication through scheduled activities •Create onboarding and training materials for Commissioners and staff Boards and Commissions CITY OF PALM SPRINGS Challenges and Recommendations CITY OF PALM SPRINGS •Challenge #1: There are currently 14 Boards and Commissions, most of which are created to advise Council on policy, but sometimes participate in administrative work. Recommendation: Realign ordinances, bylaws, and practices to reflect advisory roles. Delegate ongoing administrative work to the few Commissions that have this responsibility, such as Planning Commission and Architectural Review. Reserve all other delegated tasks on a case-by -case basis. CITY OF PALM SPRINGS •Challenge #2: Boards/ Commissions vary in size from 5 to 19 members. Larger Commissions sometimes struggle with attendance, continuity, and efficiency. Recommendation: Reduce Commissions to 5 or 7 members, excluding Airport Commission. Consider reducing Airport Commission in a way that still emphasizes regional participation (a 7-member Commission could have 4 appointees from Palm Springs and 3 from mid-Valley, East-Valley, and County.) CITY OF PALM SPRINGS •Challenge #3: All Commission meetings are held at 5:30 pm, which creates scheduling conflicts and makes logistics of hybrid meetings more difficult. Recommendation: Consider allowing Commissions to schedule meetings at other times, as long as transparency with recorded meetings and convenient options for public input are maintained. CITY OF PALM SPRINGS •Challenge #4: Boards and Commissions have varying practices with bylaws, use of subcommittees, and other practices. Recommendation: Create template bylaws for all Commissions. Require any special provision that may be necessary for some Commissions to be approved by City Council. CITY OF PALM SPRINGS •Challenge #5: Expectations regarding conduct, media relations, stakeholder engagement, working with external jurisdictions, representing Commissions with outside groups , representing the City, etc., are unclear. Recommendation: Create a template Handbook outlining various expectations for conduct and incorporate into onboarding. CITY OF PALM SPRINGS •Challenge #6: Members often lack clarity on roles, responsibilities, and important rules such as the Brown Act. Not all staff that serve as liaisons are trained in this area. Recommendation: Ensure onboarding materials cover this content and there is annual training provided to staff liaisons and Commissions. CITY OF PALM SPRINGS •Challenge #7: Boards and Commissions often lack strategic direction from Council, leading to confusion and frustration as Commissions struggle to meter the volume of work and produce recommendations that Council is ready to act on. Recommendation: Create an annual cycle of strategic planning for Boards/ Commissions that coincides with Council’s strategic visioning. CITY OF PALM SPRINGS •Challenge #8: Commissions report feeling disconnected from Council and unaware of how information is exchanged. High demand for Council Member time makes consistent participation at Commission meetings difficult. Recommendation: Create a process whereby active Commissions create and submit quarterly reports to Council; or Mayor or Council Member attends Commission meetings quarterly. Hold at least one annual meeting between Council and Commissions. CITY OF PALM SPRINGS •Challenge #9: Commissions often have ideas for engaging in additional work, subcommittees, communication content, etc. that often goes beyond researching, drafting, and presenting policy recommendations. Recommendation: Outline in Commission Handbook that staff is committed to assist the work of Commission but empowered to adjust and meter work to balance demand on staff time. CITY OF PALM SPRINGS •Challenge #10: Commissions can sometimes have tension between roles of individual members and Commission as a body. Some Commissioners engage in advancing work outside of meetings, causing confusion about what has been directed by a Commission as a body. Recommendation: Outline in Handbook expectations for conduct and emphasize limited nature of individual roles and the greater emphasis on group decision making. CITY OF PALM SPRINGS Next Steps •Staff to begin implementing recommendations •Create comprehensive Handbook and onboarding materials for Council approval •Consider recommendations specific to individual Commissions not yet outlined •Establish regular schedule of “connecting” activities such as annual dinner, quarterly meetings between Commission Chair and Mayor, staff reports etc. •Staff recommending June 21, 2022, Study Session as a Joint Meeting with Boards/ Commissions and City Council CITY OF PALM SPRINGS Questions/ Comments