Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1Q OCR CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DATE: January 27, 2022 CONSENT CALENDAR SUBJECT: AUTHORIZATION OF A PURCHASE ORDER TO RS&H CALIFORNIA, INC. TO COMPLETE AN AIRFIELD HOT SPOT STUDY IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $179,802, CITY PROJECT NO. 21-30 FROM: Justin Clifton, City Manager BY: Development Services Department SUMMARY: Approval of this item will authorize RS&H California, Inc. (“RS&H”) to proceed with conducting an airfield hot spot study at the Palm Springs International Airport. This item is 90.66% funded by a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Airport Improvement Program (AIP) grant. RECOMMENDATION: 1. Authorize a Purchase Order in an amount not to exceed $179,802 with the City’s “on- call” professional aviation consulting services firm, RS&H, a California corporation, pursuant to Agreement No. A7148 for design services for Airport Hot Spot Study, City Project No. 21-30. 2. Authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute all necessary documents. BUSINESS PRINCIPAL DISCLOSURE: The Public Integrity Disclosure Form submitted by RS&H is included as Attachment A. BACKGROUND: On May 2, 2018, the City Council approved a 5-year on-call agreement with RS&H California, Inc., (Agreement No. A7148) for professional aviation consulting services. Pursuant to FAA regulations related to on-call service agreements, the on-call agreement with RS&H California, Inc., assigned it responsibility for performing various as-needed services within the Airport, including conducting a Hot Spot Study. Item 1Q - 1 STAFF ANALYSIS: The Palm Springs International Airport is conducting a Hot Spot Study to address areas of concern on the airfield as determined by the FAA. The FAA designates a Hot Spot as a location with a history or risk of potential collision or runway incursion, or where extra attention is required of pilots and airfield drivers. The FAA has identified four Hot Spots at five locations on the Palm Springs International Airport airfield to be evaluated. The objective of the project is to evaluate and review incident data, if any, related to collisions or incursions and to consider recommendations for modifying airfield geometry, improving signage and lighting, or other solutions to minimize or eliminate the potential for future collisions or incursions. On December 22, 2021, RS&H submitted a formal proposal to the City demonstrating their understanding and approach for completion of a Hot Spot Study for a total not to exceed amount of $179,802. A copy of the proposal is included as Attachment B. Staff reviewed RS&H’s proposal and found the proposal to be qualified and complete. Staff recommends authorization of a purchase order to RS&H completion of a Hot Spot Study. Item 1Q - 2' lAN.1ARY ~2(1 "'"'""""-RATE Cf' Ol,t,N:;E 01·w ATIS 124.H f:Al/ol ~IIING~ ~ • 11?.7 377.0l Gt-0~ llU <lNCDEL 12B.JS m I _._,__._~-~-'-~~t_. I'\.. ~-._.._-+-_,__ -.-~i!CN I I ll"!ll'N * HA~Al!S I'\. .. ••1• •: • G • 1111 ,NG_.i.1\5 -~~ r "' S!All::°.fi • 1' fBQ ---51J3 ~ ~ Gft-lEW • =:t / )t-U:I..~ 1lltMtW. I RWY 13R/3ll ~ 6J F/8/W/J ffVf'f l:Jl.-{JIR l'CN S F/B{W(T ~ Al EID' 398 1---'-:=±-:-=-::--"--:::--'--...J.._--'---+---'---'-----'-----'-----4----'-_::._33"',j,~N CAIJID,I: DE Alfl!T TO WNWA'r' CIIOSSNG QEARAl"-K:ES. J lfiEADll.l,,CK OF All RUNW,.._Y HOlllN:, INS11iUCTloN5 l5 l!EGLl!ID. 116"31"'/'/ llb"30W ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: The requested City Council action is not a “Project” as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Pursuant to Section 15378(a), a “Project” means the whole of an action, which has a potential for resulting in either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. According to Section 15378(b), a “Project” does not include: (5) Organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment. FISCAL IMPACT: This project is 90.66% FAA AIP grant funded with the remaining 9.34% to be locally funded through the Airport Capital Fund. Sufficient funds are budgeted and available. REVIEWED BY: Department Director: Flinn Fagg City Manager: Justin Clifton ATTACHMENTS: A. Public Integrity Disclosure Form B. RS&H Proposal Item 1Q - 3 Attachment A Item 1Q - 4 PUBLIC INTEGRITY DISCLOSURE APPLICANT DISCLOSURE FORM 1.Name of Entity 2.Address of Entity (Principle Place of Business) 3.Local or California Address (if different than #2) 4.State where Entity is Registered with Secretary of State If other than California, is the Entity also registered in California? ☐ Yes ☐ No 5.Type of Entity ☐Corporation ☐Limited Liability Company ☐Partnership ☐Trust ☐Other (please specify) 6.Officers, Directors, Members, Managers, Trustees, Other Fiduciaries (please specify) Note: If any response is not a natural person, please identify all officers, directors, members, managers and other fiduciaries for the member, manager, trust or other entity ☐Officer ☐ Director ☐ Member ☐ Manager ☐General Partner ☐ Limited Partner ☐Other ☐Officer ☐ Director ☐ Member ☐ Manager ☐General Partner ☐ Limited Partner ☐Other ☐Officer ☐ Director ☐ Member ☐ Manager ☐General Partner ☐ Limited Partner ☐Other CITY OF PALM SPRINGS – PUBLIC INTEGRITY DISCLOSURE APPLICANT DISCLOSURE FORM Page 1 of 2 RS&H California, Inc. 369 Pine Street, Suite 610, San Francisco, CA 94104 5901 W. Century Boulevard, Suite 1030, Los Angeles, CA 90045 California X See Attachment "A" Item 1Q - 5 7.Owners/Investors with a 5% beneficial interest in the Applicant Entity or a related entity EXAMPLE: Jane Doe [name of owner/investor] 50%, ABC Company, Inc. [percentage of beneficial interest in entity and name of entity] A. [name of owner/investor] [percentage of beneficial interest in entity and name of entity] B. [name of owner/investor] [percentage of beneficial interest in entity and name of entity] C. [name of owner/investor] [percentage of beneficial interest in entity and name of entity] D. [name of owner/investor] [percentage of beneficial interest in entity and name of entity] E. [name of owner/investor] [percentage of beneficial interest in entity and name of entity] I DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT THE FOREGOING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. Signature of Disclosing Party, Printed Name, Title Date PENALTIES Falsification of information or failure to report information required to be reported may subject you to administrative action by the City. CITY OF PALM SPRINGS – PUBLIC INTEGRITY DISCLOSURE APPLICANT DISCLOSURE FORM Page 2 of 2 James W. Hullett, Jr.100% - RS&H California, Inc. January 13, 2022 Item 1Q - 6 I I ATTACHMENT “A” RS&H CALIFORNIA, INC. Public Entity Disclosure/Applicant Disclosure Form Question 6 – Officers/Directors Joseph P. Jackson Director, President James W. Hullett, Jr. Director, Vice President David J. Full Vice President, Corporate Secretary Evan H. Pfahler Vice President, Treasurer James R. Avitabile Vice President Jesse J. Forst Vice President Douglas D. Geiger Vice President Christopher M. Greene Vice President Fredrick L. Holderness Vice President Druce S. Joslin Vice President Keith M. Nix Vice President Michael Spitzer Vice President George N. Tsiouvaras Vice President Craig A. Twibell Vice President Andrew P. Wheeler Vice President John J. Bottaro Assistant Corporate Secretary E. Holt Graves Assistant Treasurer, Assistant Corporate Secretary Item 1Q - 7 Attachment B Item 1Q - 8 Hot Spot Study Scope of Work Version 2.0 January 11, 2021 Palm Springs International Airport Palm Springs, California RS&H Project No.: 226-4411-0XX Prepared by RS&H California, Inc. at the direction of the City of Palm Springs, California Item 1Q - 9 RS&ff I PROJECT DESCRIPTION The City of Palm Springs is undertaking a Hot Spot Study to address FAA identified locations on the airfield at Palms Spring International Airport that are considered problematic by the FAA. The FAA typically designates a Hot Spot at a location on an airport with a history or potential risk of collision or runway incursion, and where heightened attention by pilots and airfield drivers is necessary. FAA has identified a total of four Hot Spots (HS) at five locations at Palm Springs International. HS 1 occurs at the south and north ends of Taxiway C, as shown in the airport diagram below. FIGURE 1: PSP AIRPORT DIAGRAM AND HOT SPOTS (IMAGE COURTESY OF AIRNAV.COM, DEC. 2, 2021) The goal of this Hot Spot Study is to evaluate the identified Hot Spots, review the incident data related to incursions, and to provide recommendations for modifying airfield geometry, improving signage and lighting, or procedural solutions to minimize potential for future incursions. The Hot Spot Study will be performed by RS&H using FAA guidance including FAA advisory circulars related to airport design and operational safety as well as experience planning and design airport facilities and operating areas at other similar commercial and general aviation airports. Item 1Q - 10JANUARY 2020 ANNUAL RATE OF CHANGE 0.1°w • HANGARS I~ X ELEV 449 --••x J II~• HANGARS ,;;;E ...------.. • / STATION • TWR F8O-583 GENERAL -----AVIATION ... PARKING / U.S. CUSTOMS ~ TERMINAL'\ RWY l3R/3ll PCN 64 F /B/W /T RWY l3L-31R PCN 5 F/B/W/T Al ATIS 124.65 PALM SPRINGS TOWER• 119.7 377.05 GNDCON 121.9 CLNC DEL 128.35 m f---~---+---+---~---+---+-_----J----+---+--~----+---+--~--~ 33°49'N CAUTION: BE ALERT TO RUNWAY CROSSING CLEARANCES. j READBACK OF ALL RUNWAY HOLDING INSTRUCTIONS IS REQUIRED. l l6°3l'W l l 6°30'W II IDENTIFIED HOT SPOTS The following Hot Spots have been identified by FAA at PSP. A brief description of each Hot Spot is included for reference. » HS 1 includes Taxiway C, which may be confused for a parallel runway for aircraft on final approach to Runway 13R or Runway 31L. Pilot confusion is believed to result from Taxiway C being a full length, parallel taxiway to the air carrier runway and having the appearance of a parallel runway - pilots may confuse Taxiway C for the parallel general aviation runway (13L-31R) located northeast of Taxiway C. » HS 2 is located at the intersection of Taxiway C and Taxiway B. Pilots taxiing from the air carrier runway to the Airport’s east general aviation and FBO area may fail to hold short of Runway 31R at Taxiway B. » HS 3 is located at Taxiway B near the end of Runway 31R. Pilots taxiing from the general aviation and FBO ramps to Runway 31R may fail to hold short of Runway 31R due to limited visibility of pavement markings. » HS 4 is located at the intersection of Taxiway C and Taxiway J. Pilots taxing from the air carrier runway to the Airport’s east general aviation and FBO area may fail to hold short of Runway 13L at Taxiway J. HS 2 and HS 4 represent similar issues at each end of the general aviation runway. Item 1Q - 11 III PROJECT TASKS TASK 1 ANALYSIS OF EXISTING DATA Meetings and Preliminary Evaluation Conduct a kick-off meeting with the Sponsor, FAA, and Airport Traffic Control Tower staff to discuss the potential causes of runway incursions and establish the preliminary design goals and methods to approach resolution of incursions through modified airport geometry, enhanced markings, or controller instruction. In addition to geometric factors, RS&H shall also consider extenuating circumstances that may have contributed to previous incursions. Field Inspection RS&H will conduct a visual inspection of the airfield to determine the existing conditions and to observe the aircraft operations in the Hot Spot areas if operations permit. During the site investigation, the geometric challenges associated with the location, with specific attention to the geocodes identified by the FAA will be observed to determine potential geometry issues and constraints. o RS&H associates will visit the airport to observe, review and document operations at the identified Hot Spots if operations permit. The site visit can be completed in one to two days. During observations, ground control will be monitored, to note ATC guidance, read-back, and actual on-field taxiing. Discussion with ATC will be necessary during the inspection to provide an understanding of how ATC typically handles aircraft during peak periods. Issues that will be recorded include photographs of the area, general aircraft operations in the area, and other information deemed relevant during the site visit. o RS&H associates will coordinate with Airport staff and operations and conform to a mutually agreeable schedule that provides the best opportunity to observe relevant operations. Data Collection and Summary RS&H will collect, review, compile, and summarize available data related to the project. RS&H will review files and records to determine relevant information for the Airport to provide, such as the airport master plan, the FAA approved aviation demand forecast, the airport layout plan, aerial photogrammetry, survey data, and current considered RIM solutions. This will include a detailed review of the FAA documented runway incursion (RI) data for each location, including the category and severity Item 1Q - 12 Task1.1 Task 1.2 Task 1.3 Task 1 RS&H Team Deliverables: » Kick-off meeting agenda » Kick-off meeting summary notes » Field Visit Summary » Data Collection Summary » Preliminary Findings Report Meetings: » Hot Spot Study Meeting No. 1 - Kick-off TASK 2 DEVELOP POTENTIAL SOLUTIONS Establish Stakeholder Group RS&H will coordinate with Airport staff to assemble a stakeholder group. This group should include representation from Airport staff, FAA, ATC, and a representative from the pilot community (e.g. a general aviation pilot, airline pilot, or FBO operations representative). Other may be included as directed by airport staff. The stakeholder group should be limited to five to eight people. The purpose of the stakeholder group is to provide input and insight on local, and technical considerations as they pertain to the potential solutions. Preliminary Solutions RS&H staff will develop up to three alternatives to mitigate each Hot Spot location. The potential solutions may include physical changes to airfield geometry and/or operational changes and instructions to improve ATC-pilot communication. These alternatives could include additional training, new communication equipment, or procedural changes. RS&H will prepare rough order of magnitude cost estimates for improvements for use in evaluating the alternatives. RS&H staff will also review historical information and industry information to include mitigation measures that have been attempted at other airports to consider what may have been effective or ineffective. Stakeholder Group Meeting RS&H will present the preliminary alternatives to the Sponsor, FAA and key stakeholders during an on-site stakeholder group meeting. RS&H will manage and organize the meeting to be held at PSP Airport with stakeholders. Stakeholder may participate by digital meeting if unavailable to attend at PSP. RS&H will document the results of the stakeholder meeting and use the information Item 1Q - 13 Task 2.1 Task 2.2 Task 2.3 obtained to evaluate and improve the alternatives to achieve agreement on the preferred solution for Hot Spot mitigation. RS&H will be responsible for coordinating the stakeholder group meetings, distributing invitations, meeting format and agenda. Tasks 2.2 and 2.3 will be repeated, if needed, up to three times to refine solutions and reach consensus on workable solutions to minimize the potential for incursions at the identified PSP Hot Spots. TASK 3 FINAL PLAN PSP Hot Spot Study Final Report RS&H will prepare a report that details the findings of the PSP Hot Spot Study. The report will include data and illustrations presented in four sections: 1) Executive Summary – Including a summary of the current conditions and recommended plan from the Hot Spot Study. 2) Introduction – Including airport setting and historical data that resulted in the identification of hot spots. 3) Study Process – Including information reviewed, alternatives considered, alternatives evaluation, and stakeholder engagement process used to determine the recommended action. 4) Recommended program – Including detailed information about what actions the Airport must undertake to implement the recommendations. Details would include implementation of operations changes, such as air traffic control instructions, design and construction of improvements to airfield infrastructure, signage, lighting, or other improvements. The report will include rough order of magnitude costs that can be anticipated as well as a recommended implementation schedule to be incorporated into the Airport Capital Improvement Program. RS&H Team Deliverable: » Draft and Final PSP Hot Spot Study Report TASK 4 PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND QUALITY ASSURANCE RS&H will perform the following tasks to ensure services are executed in accordance with the degree of professional care commensurate with industry standards. Project Management RS&H will manage the project in a professional manner, will assign qualified individuals or subconsultants to the project, and will complete efforts within the published schedule. Ongoing Item 1Q - 14 Task 3.1 Task 4.1 tasks will include preparation and coordination of periodic meetings including the development of summary meeting minutes, task element setup and oversight, and overall daily administration to conduct the project. Quality Control (QC) Reviews RS&H will conduct in-house quality control reviews of all draft deliverables, Hot Spot Study summary reports, technical memoranda, and drawings prior to submittal to PSP and other stakeholders. IV PRELIMINARY PROJECT SCHEDULE The Hot Spot Study will be executed in accordance with the general schedule indicated below. Specific dates for deliverables and meetings will be determined with PSP staff. Date NTP Jan. 31, 2022 Kickoff meeting Feb. 10, 2022 Site visit Feb. 7-18, 2022 (TBD based on availability of key airport and FAA staff) Preliminary Findings Report Mar. 18, 2022 Stakeholder Meeting No. 1 Apr. 13, 2022 Stakeholder Meeting No. 2 May 18, 2022 Stakeholder Meeting No. 3 Jun. 15, 2022 Final Report Aug. 24, 2022 V ASSUMPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS The following assumptions have been made for this Scope of Work: » Adherence to the project schedule is contingent upon PSP staff providing written comments to the planning team within two weeks of submittals. » The project schedule may be impacted by FAA staff availability for meetings and review of materials. » The Scope of Work does not include an ALP update » The Scope of Work does not include a full airfield geometry review Item 1Q - 15 Task 4.2 VI PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FEE AND FEE TYPE RS&H will provide the above referenced services for a Time and Materials – Not to Exceed Fee of $179,802. See Attachment A for a breakdown of costs. Item 1Q - 16 Labor Cost: Staff:J. Jackson E. Pfahler M. Becker T. Merrill S. Derengoski B. Moncrieff L. Rowe P. Leung Labor Category:Project Officer Sr. Planner Project Manager CAD Tech IV Planner II Planner 1 Admin Engineer IV Reimbursable Hourly Rate:$446.81 $349.32 $215.99 $146.07 $112.58 $91.66 $84.66 $252.46 Task 1 Analysis of Existing Conditions 1.1 Meetings and Preliminary Evaluation 4 8 24 - 24 - - - 1.2 Field Inspection - 16 80 - 40 - - - 1.3 Data Collection and Summary - - 24 16 40 32 - - Total Task 1 Analysis of Existing Conditions 4 24 128 16 104 32 - - 308 $54,796 Task 2 Develop Potential Solutions 2.1 Establish Stakeholder Group 1 4 8 4 - - 2.2 Preliminary Solutions 24 24 80 40 - 24 2.3 Stakeholder Group Meetings 4 32 80 24 80 - - Total Task 2 Develop Potential Solutions 5 36 112 48 164 40 - 24 429 $74,200 Task 3 Prepare Mitigation Plan Report - 3.1 Prepare Hot Spot Study Mitigation Report - 12 32 16 40 - - - Total Task 3 Prepare Mitigation Plan Report - 12 32 16 40 - - - 100 $17,944 Task 4 Project Management and Quality Assurance 4.1 Project Management 4 2 32 - 16 - 48 4.2 Quality Control 16 8 2 - - - - Total Task 4 Project Management and Quality Assurance 20 10 34 - 16 - 48 - 128 $25,638 Total Hours 29 82 306 80 324 72 48 24 965 Labor Cost $12,957 $28,644 $66,093 $11,686 $36,476 $6,600 $4,064 $6,059 $172,578 Other Direct Non-Labor Costs: Reproduction:$0 Travel:Airfare Car Lodging Per Diem Pkg Trips People # Days $500 $80 $200 $63 $25 Total Site Visit 1 - Field Inspection 1 2 3 $1,000 $240 $800 $126 $150 $2,166 Site Visit 2 - Stakeholder meeting 1 1 2 2 $1,000 $160 $400 $126 $100 $1,686 Site Visit 3 - Stakeholder meeting 2 1 2 2 $1,000 $160 $400 $126 $100 $1,686 Site Visit 4 - Stakeholder meeting 3 1 2 2 $1,000 $160 $400 $126 $100 $1,686 Subtotal Travel:$7,224 Total Direct Non-Labor Costs $7,224 Total Time and Materials - Not to Exceed Fee $179,802 Total City of Palm Springs Palm Springs International Airport Attachment A - Project Cost Hot Spot Study Time and Materials - Not to Exceed Fee Item 1Q - 17 RS&H