Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1G OCRCITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DATE: January 27, 2022 CONSENT CALENDAR SUBJECT: AUTHORIZATION OF A PURCHASE ORDER TO RS&H CALIFORNIA, INC. FOR PRE-DESIGN, DESIGN, AND BID PHASE SERVICES IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $595,485 FOR AIRPORT TAXIWAY REHABILITATION, CITY PROJECT NO. 21-27 FROM: Justin Clifton, City Manager BY: Development Services Department SUMMARY: Approval of this item will authorize RS&H California, Inc. (“RS&H”) to proceed with pre- design, design, and bid phase services for the rehabilitation of taxiways at the Palm Springs International Airport. This item is 90.66% funded by a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Airport Improvement Program (AIP) grant. RECOMMENDATION: 1.Authorize a Purchase Order in an amount not to exceed $595,485 with the City’s “on- call” professional aviation consulting services firm, RS&H, a California corporation, pursuant to Agreement No. A7148, design services for Airport Taxiway Rehabilitation, City Project No. 21-27. 2.Authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute all necessary documents. BUSINESS PRINCIPAL DISCLOSURE: The Public Integrity Disclosure Form submitted by RS&H is included as Attachment A. BACKGROUND: On May 2, 2018, the City Council approved a 5-year on-call agreement with RS&H California, Inc., (Agreement No. A7148) for professional aviation consulting services. Pursuant to FAA regulations related to on-call service agreements, the on-call agreement with RS&H California, Inc., assigned it responsibility for performing various as-needed services within the Airport, including capital projects associated with the rehabilitation of airfield taxiways. Item 1G - 1 On September 18, 2019, the City Council approved a purchase order with WSP USA, Inc. (“WSP”) for the completion of an Airfield Pavement Condition Index (PCI) report inclusive of all airfield pavements. PCIs are generally conducted at set intervals to inform the FAA of when pavement has reached its useful life and to request new grant assistance for rehabilitation or full replacement. STAFF ANALYSIS: WSP conveyed their airfield pavement rehabilitation recommendations through a March 31, 2021 Pavement Condition Index Survey & Analysis to the City. The PCI’s findings classified various taxiways at the airport as being of “fair” or “poor” quality requiring rehabilitation per the FAA’s pavement ranking methodology. The taxiway rehabilitation project will rehabilitate Taxiway W, associated connector Taxiways A, A1, B, G, J, K, W1, W2 and a portion of the pavement on the terminal apron. Item 1G - 2 Na m e Bra nch Section PC l1 PCR2 %load Area, {sf) T.mwayA T A 05 43 Poor 52 57,823 T.mwayA 1 T A 1 0 1 66 Fa ir 54 22,965 T.mwayA 1 T A 1 02 52 Poor 0 97,16 1 T.Dciway B T B 09 59 Fa ir 26 26,406 T.Dciway G TG 02 54 Poor 0 43,990 T.mwayJ TJI 07 52 Poor 34 93,597 T.mway K T K 04 54 Poor 14 9 1,125 T.mwayW TW 0 1 65 Fa ir 30 9 1,125 T.mwayW TW 02 50 Poor 53 266,583 T.mwayw TW 03 55 Poor 4 1 303,640 T.mwayW1 TW1 03 65 Fa ir 46 25,132 T.mwayW2 TW2 0 1 66 Fa ir 36 15,650 Termi na'I Apron ATlERM 02A 47 Poor 0 7,11 2 Tota l 1,272,657 1 2024 Estim ated PCI 2 Good = 100-86; Satisfactory = 85 -7 1; Fair = 70-56; Poor = 55 -4 1; Very Poor = 40-26 While WSP’s PCI report mentions the need to rehabilitate or reconstruct, the report does not indicate the appropriate rehabilitation methods for the various airfield pavement sections identified. Additional investigations would need to be completed to determine the appropriate rehabilitation method for each airfield pavement section. On December 22, 2021, RS&H submitted a formal proposal to the City demonstrating their understanding and approach for taxiway rehabilitation design services for a total not to exceed amount of $595,485. A copy of their proposal is included as Attachment B. Staff reviewed RS&H’s proposal and found RS&H’s proposal to be qualified and complete. Staff recommends authorization of a purchase order to RS&H for taxiway rehabilitation pre-design, design, and bid phase services. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) Guidelines Section 15301 “Existing Facilities”, Class 1 projects consist of the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing public structures, facilities, mechanical equipment or topographical features involving negligible or no expansion of existing or former use. Therefore, Staff has determined that Airport Taxiway Rehabilitation, City Project 21-27, is considered categorically exempt from CEQA. A Notice of Exemption will be filed with the Riverside County Clerk. FISCAL IMPACT: The project is 90.66% FAA AIP grant funded with the remaining 9.34% to be locally funded through the Airport Capital Fund. Sufficient funds are budgeted and available. REVIEWED BY: Department Director: Flinn Fagg City Manager: Justin Clifton ATTACHMENTS: A. Public Integrity Disclosure Form B. RS&H Proposal Item 1G - 3 Attachment A Item 1G - 4 PUBLIC INTEGRITY DISCLOSURE APPLICANT DISCLOSURE FORM 1.Name of Entity 2.Address of Entity (Principle Place of Business) 3.Local or California Address (if different than #2) 4.State where Entity is Registered with Secretary of State If other than California, is the Entity also registered in California? ☐ Yes ☐ No 5.Type of Entity ☐Corporation ☐Limited Liability Company ☐Partnership ☐Trust ☐Other (please specify) 6.Officers, Directors, Members, Managers, Trustees, Other Fiduciaries (please specify) Note: If any response is not a natural person, please identify all officers, directors, members, managers and other fiduciaries for the member, manager, trust or other entity ☐Officer ☐ Director ☐ Member ☐ Manager ☐General Partner ☐ Limited Partner ☐Other ☐Officer ☐ Director ☐ Member ☐ Manager ☐General Partner ☐ Limited Partner ☐Other ☐Officer ☐ Director ☐ Member ☐ Manager ☐General Partner ☐ Limited Partner ☐Other CITY OF PALM SPRINGS – PUBLIC INTEGRITY DISCLOSURE APPLICANT DISCLOSURE FORM Page 1 of 2 RS&H California, Inc. 369 Pine Street, Suite 610, San Francisco, CA 94104 5901 W. Century Boulevard, Suite 1030, Los Angeles, CA 90045 California X See Attachment "A" Item 1G - 5 7.Owners/Investors with a 5% beneficial interest in the Applicant Entity or a related entity EXAMPLE: Jane Doe [name of owner/investor] 50%, ABC Company, Inc. [percentage of beneficial interest in entity and name of entity] A. [name of owner/investor] [percentage of beneficial interest in entity and name of entity] B. [name of owner/investor] [percentage of beneficial interest in entity and name of entity] C. [name of owner/investor] [percentage of beneficial interest in entity and name of entity] D. [name of owner/investor] [percentage of beneficial interest in entity and name of entity] E. [name of owner/investor] [percentage of beneficial interest in entity and name of entity] I DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT THE FOREGOING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. Signature of Disclosing Party, Printed Name, Title Date PENALTIES Falsification of information or failure to report information required to be reported may subject you to administrative action by the City. CITY OF PALM SPRINGS – PUBLIC INTEGRITY DISCLOSURE APPLICANT DISCLOSURE FORM Page 2 of 2 James W. Hullett, Jr.100% - RS&H California, Inc. January 13, 2022 Item 1G - 6 ATTACHMENT “A” RS&H CALIFORNIA, INC. Public Entity Disclosure/Applicant Disclosure Form Question 6 – Officers/Directors Joseph P. Jackson Director, President James W. Hullett, Jr. Director, Vice President David J. Full Vice President, Corporate Secretary Evan H. Pfahler Vice President, Treasurer James R. Avitabile Vice President Jesse J. Forst Vice President Douglas D. Geiger Vice President Christopher M. Greene Vice President Fredrick L. Holderness Vice President Druce S. Joslin Vice President Keith M. Nix Vice President Michael Spitzer Vice President George N. Tsiouvaras Vice President Craig A. Twibell Vice President Andrew P. Wheeler Vice President John J. Bottaro Assistant Corporate Secretary E. Holt Graves Assistant Treasurer, Assistant Corporate Secretary Item 1G - 7 Attachment B Item 1G - 8 DRAFT Version 1.0 December 22, 2021 Palm Springs International Airport Palm Springs, California RS&H Project No.: 226-4411-XXX Prepared by RS&H California, Inc. at the direction of the City of Palm Springs Taxiway W and Associated Connector Taxiways Rehabilitation Scope of Work Item 1G - 9 I PROJECT DESCRIPTION The City of Palm Springs (owner and operator of Palm Springs International Airport (PSP)) has requested RS&H California, Inc. to provide a project proposal for professional engineering and surveying services for the Taxiway W and Associated Connector Taxiways Rehabilitation Project. The proposed project will rehabilitate Taxiway W, associated connector Taxiways A, A1, B, G, J, K, W1, W2, and a portion of pavement on the terminal apron. This project is based on rehabilitation recommendations from the Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Survey & Analysis for AIP Projects report prepared by WSP for the City of Palm Springs dated March 31, 2021. Major rehabilitation recommendations for CY 2022 and 2023 along with pavement areas identified for major rehabilitation adjacent to the areas in these years to provide a project that results in reasonable project phasing to minimize operational impacts is being proposed. Table 1 provides additional information on the specific branches, sections, Pavement Condition Index (PCI), Pavement Condition Rating (PCR), area, and costs that were taken from the WSP report. TABLE 1: PCI INFORMATION FOR PROPOSED PAVEMENT AREAS Name Branch Section PCI1 PCR2 % Load Area (sf) Taxiway A TA 05 43 Poor 52 57,823 Taxiway A1 TA1 01 66 Fair 54 22,965 Taxiway A1 TA1 02 52 Poor 0 97,161 Taxiway B TB 09 59 Fair 26 26,406 Taxiway G TG 02 54 Poor 0 43,990 Taxiway J TJ 07 52 Poor 34 93,597 Taxiway K TK 04 54 Poor 14 91,125 Taxiway W TW 01 65 Fair 30 91,125 Taxiway W TW 02 50 Poor 53 266,583 Taxiway W TW 03 55 Poor 41 303,640 Taxiway W1 TW1 03 65 Fair 46 25,132 Taxiway W2 TW2 01 66 Fair 36 15,650 Terminal Apron ATERM 02A 47 Poor 0 7,112 Total 1,272,657 1 2024 Estimated PCI 2 Good = 100-86; Satisfactory = 85-71; Fair = 70-56; Poor = 55-41; Very Poor = 40-26 3 Determination of costs are unknown, but construction costs are expected to be much higher Item 1G - 10 Typically, pavements with a PCR of “Fair” are candidates for rehabilitation, however, there are times when a rehabilitation strategy is justified on pavements with a PCR in the “Poor” category. Rehabilitation is defined by the FAA as the replacement of a portion of the pavement structural layers, which it is generally more cost effective to rehabilitate a pavement than to reconstruct it. The PCI report prepared by WSP identifies major rehabilitation to be either reconstruction or overlays. Assumptions were made by WSP that for reconstruction, a cross-section like those used during recent projects was assumed. For jet-trafficked asphalt concrete pavements recommended for reconstruction, the cross-section was assumed to be 9 inches of asphalt concrete, over 10 inches of crushed aggregate base. For pavements where mill and replace was the recommended action, a standard mill and replace depth was assumed. For pavements that receive jet traffic the mill and replace thickness was assumed to be 3 inches. Note: Although WSP mentions the pavements recommended for either reconstruction or rehabilitation, nowhere in the report does it identify which sections are recommended for reconstruction vs. rehabilitation. Additionally, WSP notes “it will be necessary to conduct an engineering study prior to completing any specific rehabilitation project to ensure that the appropriate rehabilitation strategy is chosen and that the pavement thickness is adjusted to ensure an adequate structural section.” It is not anticipated for any rehabilitation to occur on the taxiway shoulders other than necessary tie in locations. No lighting/signage/vault work is included in this scope. As part of this proposal the predesign services will include performing data collection and site reviews to determine the appropriate rehabilitation methods for the pavements that are highlighted on the next page. The result of those investigations will define the estimated construction costs for the project. For this proposal, it is estimated that construction costs for this project could be approximately $10M based on previous costs for this type of project at Palm Springs International Airport. This estimate is based on rehabilitating 1,272,657 SF at $6.00/SF with a 30% contingency. Item 1G - 11 FIGURE 1: OVERALL PROJECT LIMITS Item 1G - 12 Specific work elements include the following: » General coordination » Project phasing » Safety and security » Dimensional control » Boring layout » Site plan » Existing conditions » Demolition requirements » Geometric layout of proposed taxiway pavements » Paving plan and elevation grids » Pavement profiles and cross sections » Pavement markings » Erosion control and Stormwater Pollution Prevention (“SWPPP”) Best Management Practices (“BMPs”) » Project details and element descriptions, as necessary » Site-specific Construction Safety Phasing Plan (“CSPP”) » Site-specific Construction Management Program (“CMP”) » Permit Coordination » FAA and Tenant Coordination The project will be evaluated and designed to the following FAA Advisory Circulars, as applicable, including (but not limited to): » FAA AC 150/5300-13A – Change 1 Airport Design » FAA AC 150/5335-5D Standardized Method of Reporting Pavement Strength – PCR » FAA AC 150/5340-1M Standards for Airport Markings » FAA AC 150/5370-2G Operational Safety on Airports during Construction » FAA AC 150/5370-12A Quality Control of Construction for Airport Grant Projects » FAA AC 150/5370-13A Off-Peak Construction of Airport Pavements Using Hot-Mix Asphalt » FAA AC 150/5370-14B Hot Mix Asphalt Paving Handbook » FAA AC 150/5320-6E Airport Pavement Design and Evaluation » FAA AC 150/5370-10H Standards for Specifying Construction of Airports Item 1G - 13 This project is anticipated to be packaged as a single bid package and bid schedule. II PROJECT TASKS TASK 1 PREDESIGN SERVICES Task 1.1 Predesign Meeting RS&H shall coordinate and attend one (1) kick-off meeting with Airport staff at the Airport to establish the preliminary design goals and methods. Meeting minutes will be developed following the meeting and distributed to all attendees. Task 1.2 Data Collection/Review of Existing Data RS&H will review, compile, and summarize available data related to the project. The City will provide any existing data within the project area that is available including record drawings, engineers reports, construction reports, and other data. RS&H will review files and records to determine relevant information for the Airport to provide, such as the airport master plan, airport layout plan, pavement evaluation reports, aerial photogrammetry, survey data, previous design plans as-built drawings, specifications, and geotechnical investigation reports. Historical record drawing information and available CAD data will be incorporated into the base files. Task 1.3 Site Review RS&H will conduct a detailed visual inspection of the site to determine the conditions of the project area. This activity is expected to be completed during 2 full days. RS&H will photograph the current site condition, record the general extent of pavement distresses, and other associated elements (such as grading, tie in elevations, haul route & contractor logistics, drainage, utilities, signage, markings, etc.) The findings of the visual inspection will be documented in the Preliminary Engineers Report. Task 1.4 Topographic Survey RS&H will coordinate and review specific geometric criteria required for topography, profile, and cross-sectional survey of existing drainage areas, above and below ground utilities, existing site improvements, and definition of any obvious topographic depressions. RS&H and the surveying subconsultant will perform necessary field survey for the project in accordance with FAA requirements. All surveying activities will be coordinated with the Airport prior to surveying. The topographic surveying scope of work is included in Attachment B. Task 1.5 Non Destructive Testing NDT testing will be performed on pavement to supplement the PCI survey data that will lead to the development of the appropriate rehabilitation for this project. In addition, NDT testing will be performed on pavements to generate ACR/PCR values for each airside facility in accordance with AC 150/5335-5. Item 1G - 14 The purpose of the NDT subtask is the acquisition of quantitative data for use as a reliable input in the structural evaluation of pavement performance and rehabilitation needs. NDT field data will be reduced to yield the following structural characterizations: » Impulse Stiffness Modulus (ISM), i.e., force/deflection. The Impulse Stiffness Modulus (ISM) is defined as dynamic force divided by dynamic response (deflection) at the center of the loaded area. The ISM describes the dynamic behavior (stiffness) of the entire pavement system. ISM results are primarily used to evaluate patterns of variability in pavement strength and to segment pavements into statistically equivalent areas. » Elastic Modulus (E) of pavement layers and subgrade using back calculation methods using existing pavement cross section obtained from borings or as-built construction records. The back-calculated values are then used as input to pavement analysis programs that use conventional and elastic layer theory for evaluation and design. The NDT testing scope of work is included in Attachment C. Task 1.6 Geotechnical Investigation In addition to performing NDT testing to analyze the appropriate rehabilitation, destructive testing in the form of cores and bores along with associated laboratory testing will also be performed after the HWD testing is completed and areas are identified for further destructive testing. Since NDT testing will narrow down where any issues may be throughout the airside pavements, the number of cores and bores is estimated to be one per branch of pavement with some additional cores and bores in areas where the pavement is rated as “poor”, and the noted distresses are load related. In total it is estimated that approximately 20 cores and bores and associated testing will be performed. All geotechnical investigation activities will be coordinated with the Airport staff prior to mobilization. RS&H will coordinate and review with the geotechnical subconsultant specific requirements with respect to existing utilities, backfill, and mobilization/demobilization. All geotechnical data will be provided to the Airport in PDF format. The detailed geotechnical scope is shown in Attachment D. Task 1.7 Project Management RS&H will manage the Project in a professional manner, assign and manage qualified individuals or subconsultants to the Project, and complete the efforts within the proposed time frame. This task will include scheduling, resource allocation, monitoring, oversight, direction, and control for all aspects of the team’s efforts including assembly and coordination of all documentation. RS&H will complete meeting preparation activities, prepare, and distribute meeting minutes, and assign appropriate follow-up activities. RS&H will make monthly progress reports to the Item 1G - 15 Airport during the entire duration of the project. Project management also includes monthly project and budget reporting to senior leadership to provide regular updates and to confirm RS&H Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) are incorporated. TASK 2 30% DESIGN PHASE Task 2.1 Prepare 30% Design Documents RS&H will prepare 30% drawings, specification list, opinion of probable construction cost, and Preliminary Engineer's Report. The 30% Complete Design will identify, evaluate, and resolve specific elements of the project for a technically sound and economically complete project. The plan development at the 30% level will include preliminary development of all horizontal geometry, contractor staging and access, demolition, and pavement rehabilitation options. Pavement demolition, geometry, and pavement sections will be preliminary for this deliverable but will include the entire project site. The development of the 30% complete design will be in coordination with the Airport and the FAA for their input. The following list of drawings (with the anticipated progress) will be included with the 30% design submittal. 4 C001-C004 Cover, Index & Notes, Quantities Preliminary 2 C005-006 Safety and Security Notes and Details Preliminary 1 C007 Contract Layout Plan Preliminary 1 C008 Part 77 Airspace Plan Preliminary 6 C009-C014 Conceptual Phasing Plans Preliminary 10 C101-C110 Pavement Demolition Plans Preliminary 10 C201-C210 Geometry & Paving Plans Preliminary 3 C211-C213 Typical Pavement Sections & Details Preliminary 10 C701-C710 Pavement Marking Plans Preliminary 3 C711-C713 Pavement Marking Details Preliminary 50 Total Drawings The intent of the 30% design will be to identify all components of the project and verify all major scope components. The engineer’s opinion of probable construction cost for the 30% complete design will carry a 15% contingency that will be reduced in subsequent deliverables. The specifications will be reviewed, and a list of all specifications will be included in the deliverable. Item 1G - 16 Task 2.2 Outline/Draft Construction Safety & Phasing Plan (CSPP) RS&H will prepare an Outline/Draft CSPP in accordance with AC 150/5370-2G and submit to the FAA- ADO. Depending on the complexity of a project is how far in advance the FAA recommends submitting the Draft CSPP. It is anticipated that this project will be considered of moderate complexity and should be submitted 3-4 months prior to advertising. This document will detail the CSPP provisions developed to date. Task 2.3 30% Design Coordination Meetings RS&H will coordinate and attend coordination meetings with the Airport to coordinate design issues related to the project. The meetings will occur at the airport. It is anticipated that there will be 1 meeting with 2 people in attendance at the Airport and 1 meeting with 3 people in attendance remotely. Task 2.4 Quality Control Review RS&H will conduct in-house quality control review of the 30% Complete Design plans, specifications outline, opinion of probable construction cost, and Preliminary Engineer’s Design Report prior to submittal to the Airport and FAA. Task 2.5 Submittal of 30% Documents RS&H will submit the 30% design plans, specifications outline, preliminary opinion of probable construction cost, and preliminary Engineer’s Design Report to the Airport for review, comment, and approval to proceed to 60% design. See Section IV Deliverables for additional submittal information. Task 2.6 30% Design Review Meeting RS&H will prepare for and attend one (1) meeting at the Airport to review the 30% Design submittal. RS&H will provide written minutes of the meeting and distribute to all attendees. The Airport and the FAA will provide any additional written comments to RS&H within two weeks of the design review meeting that may affect the direction of the project. (2 People-1 Day) Task 2.7 Project Management RS&H will manage the Project in a professional manner, assign and manage qualified individuals or subconsultants to the Project, and complete the efforts within the proposed time frame. This task will include scheduling, resource allocation, monitoring, oversight, direction, and control for all aspects of the team’s efforts including assembly and coordination of all documentation. RS&H will complete meeting preparation activities, prepare, and distribute meeting minutes, and assign appropriate follow-up activities. RS&H will make monthly progress reports to the Airport during the entire duration of the project. Project management also includes monthly project and budget reporting to senior leadership to provide regular updates and to confirm RS&H Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) are incorporated. Item 1G - 17 TASK 3 60% DESIGN PHASE Task 3.1 30% Review Comment Incorporation RS&H will review all comments received from the Airport and the FAA from the previous submittal review and incorporate applicable comments into plans, specifications, opinion of probable construction cost, and Engineer’s Design Report. Task 3.2 Prepare 60% Design Documents RS&H will prepare 60% drawings, Specifications (General Provisions, Special Conditions & Technical Specifications), opinion of probable construction cost, and Engineer's Design Report. The 60% Complete Design will identify, evaluate, and resolve specific elements of the project for a technically sound and economically complete project. The plan development at the 60% level will include advanced development of all horizontal geometry, contractor staging and access, demolition, and pavement design. Vertical (profiles, grading, sections, etc.) will be preliminary for this deliverable. The development of the 60% complete design will be in coordination with the Airport and the FAA for their input. The following list of drawings (with the anticipated progress) will be included with the 60% design submittal. 4 C001-C004 Cover, Index & Notes, Quantities Advanced 2 C005-006 Safety and Security Notes and Details Advanced 2 C007-008 Contract Layout Plan, Staging Area, and Details Advanced 1 C009 Part 77 Airspace Layout Plan Advanced 1 C010 Overall Phasing Plan Advanced 10 C011-C021 Phasing Plans Preliminary 3 C022-C024 Horizontal & Vertical Control & Geotechnical Borings Advanced 10 C101-C110 Pavement Demolition Plans Advanced 2 C111-C112 Pavement Demolition Details Advanced 10 C201-C210 Geometry & Paving Plans Advanced 3 C211-C213 Typical Pavement Sections & Details Advanced 20 C301-C320 Centerline Plans & Profiles Preliminary 5 C401-C405 Erosion Control Plans and Details Preliminary 1 C410 Local Air Quality Management Plan Preliminary 10 C601-C610 Spot Elevation Plans Preliminary 10 C711-C710 Pavement Marking Details Advanced 2 C701-C713 Pavement Marking Plans Advanced 96 Total Drawings Item 1G - 18 The engineer’s opinion of probable construction cost for the 60% complete design will carry a 10% contingency that will be reduced in subsequent deliverables. The Specifications will be reviewed, and each anticipated section will be included in the deliverable. The Engineer’s Design Report will include significant development for each section with progress relative to the design effort. Final pavement design verification will be developed during the 60% design including the completion of development using the FAARFIELD computer program. A preliminary list of all proposed, requested FAA Modification to Standards will be included in the 60% Engineer’s Design Report. Task 3.3 60% Design Coordination Meetings RS&H will coordinate and attend coordination meetings with the Airport to coordinate design issues related to the project. The meetings will occur at the airport. (2 Meetings-2 People) Task 3.4 Safety Risk Management and Panel Participation RS&H will attend, coordinate, and prepare meeting notes for a FAA SRM Panel review for the proposed project. As a part of this task, RS&H will prepare a change proposal report that documents the proposed phasing plan and impacts. This report will be delivered to the Airport prior to the 90% design deliverable and will be forwarded to the FAA Tower for review. This task is for participation in the SRM panel. It is not included in the scope to run the SRM panel. Task 3.5 Quality Control Review RS&H will conduct in-house quality control review of the 60% Design plans, specifications, opinion of probable construction cost, and Engineer’s Design Report prior to submittal to the Airport and FAA. Task 3.6 Submittal of 60% Documents RS&H will submit the 60% design plans, specifications outline, preliminary opinion of probable construction cost, and Engineer’s Design Report to the Airport for review, comment, and approval to proceed to 90% design. See Section IV Deliverables for additional submittal information. Task 3.7 60% Design Review Meeting RS&H will prepare for and attend one (1) meeting at the Airport to review the 60% Design submittal. RS&H will provide written minutes of the meeting and distribute to all attendees. The Airport and the FAA will provide any additional written comments to RS&H within two weeks of the design review meeting that may affect the direction of the project. (2 People-1 Day) Item 1G - 19 Task 3.8 Project Management RS&H will manage the Project in a professional manner, assign and manage qualified individuals or subconsultants to the Project, and complete the efforts within the proposed time frame. This task will include scheduling, resource allocation, monitoring, oversight, direction, and control for all aspects of the team’s efforts including assembly and coordination of all documentation. RS&H will complete meeting preparation activities, prepare, and distribute meeting minutes, and assign appropriate follow-up activities. RS&H will make monthly progress reports to the Airport during the entire duration of the project. Project management also includes monthly project and budget reporting to senior leadership to provide regular updates and to confirm RS&H Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) are incorporated. TASK 4 90% DESIGN PHASE Task 4.1 60% Review Comment Incorporation RS&H will review all comments received from the Airport and the FAA from the previous submittal review and incorporate applicable comments into plans, specifications, opinion of probable construction cost, and Engineer’s Design Report. Task 4.2 Prepare 90% Design Documents RS&H will prepare 90% drawings, Specifications (General Provisions, Special Conditions & Technical Specifications), opinion of probable construction cost, and Engineer's Design Report. The 90% Design will identify, evaluate, and resolve specific elements of the project for a technically sound and economically complete project. The development of the 90% design will be in coordination with the Airport and the FAA for their input. The following list of drawings (with the anticipated progress) will be included with the 60% design submittal. 4 C001-C004 Cover, Index & Notes, Quantities Advanced 2 C005-006 Safety and Security Notes and Details Advanced 2 C007 Contract Layout Plan Advanced 1 C008 Part 77 Airspace Layout Plan Advanced 1 C009 Overall Phasing Plan Advanced 10 C010-C020 Phasing Plans Advanced 3 C020-C023 Horizontal & Vertical Control & Geotechnical Borings Advanced 10 C101-C110 Pavement Demolition Plans Advanced 2 C111-C112 Pavement Demolition Details Advanced 10 C201-C210 Geometry & Paving Plans Advanced 3 C211-C213 Typical Pavement Sections & Details Advanced Item 1G - 20 20 C301-C320 Centerline Plans & Profiles Advanced 5 C401-C405 Erosion Control Plans and Details Advanced 1 C410 Local Air Quality Management Plan Advanced 10 C601-C610 Spot Elevation Plans Advanced 10 C711-C710 Pavement Marking Details Advanced 2 C701-C713 Pavement Marking Plans Advanced 8 C801-808 Cross Sections Advanced 103 Total Drawings The engineer’s opinion of probable construction cost for the 90% design will carry a 5% contingency that will be reduced in subsequent deliverables. RS&H will receive the Front-End sections from the Airport and review for project specifics. These specifications will be submitted back to the Airport for review prior to the advertisement and bidding. The Specifications will be reviewed, and each anticipated section will be included in the deliverable. The Engineer’s Design Report will include significant development for each section with progress relative to the design effort. A pre-final list of all proposed, requested FAA Modification to Standards will be included in the 90% Engineer’s Design Report. Any modifications to Standards will need to be submitted through the AGIS MOS tool, for review and approval. Final signed copies of the MOS will be included in the Engineer’s Design Report. Task 4.3 Construction Safety & Phasing Plan (CSPP) RS&H will prepare the Final CSPP in accordance with AC 150/5370-2G and submit to the FAA- ADO for approval. This document will also be included in the bidding documents provided to the contractor. RS&H shall prepare and coordinate with the Airport the submittal of FAA Form 7460-1 and related documentation for FAA airspace review of the project. Task 4.4 90% Design Coordination Meetings RS&H will coordinate and attend coordination meetings with the Airport to coordinate design issues related to the project. The meetings will occur at the airport. (2 Meetings-2 People) Task 4.5 Quality Control Review RS&H will conduct in-house quality control review of the 90% Design plans, specifications, opinion of probable construction cost, and Engineer’s Design Report prior to submittal to the Airport and FAA. Item 1G - 21 Task 4.6 Submittal of 90% Documents RS&H will submit the 90% design plans, specifications, opinion of probable construction cost, and Engineer’s Design Report to the Airport for review, comment, and approval to proceed to 100% design. See Section IV Deliverables for additional submittal information. Task 4.7 90% Design Review Meeting RS&H will prepare for and attend one (1) meeting at the Airport to review the 90% Design submittal. RS&H will provide written minutes of the meeting and distribute to all attendees. The Airport and the FAA will provide any additional written comments to RS&H within two weeks of the design review meeting that may affect the direction of the project. (2 People-2 Day) Task 4.8 Project Management RS&H will manage the Project in a professional manner, assign and manage qualified individuals or subconsultants to the Project, and complete the efforts within the proposed time frame. This task will include scheduling, resource allocation, monitoring, oversight, direction, and control for all aspects of the team’s efforts including assembly and coordination of all documentation. RS&H will complete meeting preparation activities, prepare, and distribute meeting minutes, and assign appropriate follow-up activities. RS&H will make monthly progress reports to the Airport during the entire duration of the project. Project management also includes monthly project and budget reporting to senior leadership to provide regular updates and to confirm RS&H Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) are incorporated. TASK 5 100% DESIGN PHASE (BID DOCUMENTS) Task 5.1 90% Review Comment Incorporation RS&H will review all comments received from the Airport and the FAA from the previous submittal review and incorporate applicable comments into plans, specifications, opinion of probable construction cost, and Engineer’s Design Report. Task 5.2 Prepare 100% Documents (Bid Documents) RS&H will prepare 100% drawings, Specifications (General Provisions, Special Conditions & Technical Specifications), final opinion of probable construction cost, and Engineer's Design Report. The 100% Design will identify, evaluate, and resolve specific elements of the project for a technically sound and economically complete project. The development of the 100% design will be in coordination with the Airport and the FAA for their input. The following list of drawings (with the anticipated progress) will be included with the 60% design submittal. Item 1G - 22 4 C001-C004 Cover, Index & Notes, Quantities Final 2 C005-006 Safety and Security Notes, Schedules, and Details Final 2 C007 Contract Layout Plan, Staging Area, and Details Final 1 C008 Part 77 Airspace Layout Plan Final 1 C009 Overall Phasing Plan Final 10 C010-C020 Phasing Plans Final 3 C020-C023 Horizontal & Vertical Control & Geotechnical Borings Final 10 C101-C110 Demolition Plans Final 2 C111-C112 Demolition Details Final 10 C201-C210 Geometry & Paving Plans Final 3 C211-C213 Typical Pavement Sections & Details Final 20 C301-C320 Centerline Plans & Profiles Final 5 C401-C405 Erosion Control Plans and Details Final 1 C410 Local Air Quality Management Plan Final 10 C601-C610 Spot Elevation Plans Final 10 C711-C710 Pavement Marking Details Final 2 C701-C713 Pavement Marking Plans Final 8 C801-C808 Cross Sections Final 103 Total Drawings The engineer’s opinion of probable construction cost for the 100% design will carry a 0% contingency. RS&H will modify sections of the Front-End Documents, as appropriate, based upon coordination with the Airport and based upon review comments provided by the Airport. The Specifications will be completed with each section modified accordingly. Final modifications to FAA Standard Technical specifications will be included in the 100% deliverable. The Engineer’s Design Report will include the final development for each section. All issues will be resolved at this deliverable and will be included in the Final Engineer’s Design Report. Task 5.3 100% Design Coordination Meetings RS&H will coordinate and attend coordination meetings with the Airport to coordinate design issues related to the project. The meetings will occur at the airport. (1 Meeting-2 People) Item 1G - 23 Task 5.4 Quality Control Review RS&H will conduct in-house quality control review of the 100% Design plans, specifications, opinion of probable construction cost, and Engineer’s Design Report prior to submittal to the Airport and FAA. Task 5.5 Submittal of 100% Documents RS&H will submit the 100% design plans, specifications, opinion of probable construction cost, and Engineer’s Design Report to the Airport for bidding purposes. See Section IV Deliverables for additional submittal information. Task 5.6 Project Management RS&H will manage the Project in a professional manner, assign and manage qualified individuals or subconsultants to the Project, and complete the efforts within the proposed time frame. This task will include scheduling, resource allocation, monitoring, oversight, direction, and control for all aspects of the team’s efforts including assembly and coordination of all documentation. RS&H will complete meeting preparation activities, prepare, and distribute meeting minutes, and assign appropriate follow-up activities. RS&H will make monthly progress reports to the Airport for the entire duration of the project. Project management also includes monthly project and budget reporting to senior leadership to provide regular updates and to confirm RS&H Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) are incorporated. TASK 6 BIDDING PHASE SERVICES Task 6.1 Pre-Bid Conference RS&H will prepare for and attend a pre-bid conference at the Airport. RS&H will describe specific elements of the project as requested by the Airport, receive comments, record the minutes of the conference, and distribute to the Airport’s authorized representative and prospective contractors. RS&H will attend a site walk/visit during the Pre-Bid Conference. (2 People) Task 6.2 Addenda RS&H will assist in the preparation of addenda to revise plans, specifications and other contract documents prepared by the RS&H to (1) provide clarifications, (2) correct discrepancies, or (3) correct errors and/or omissions. RS&H will submit this information in hard copy format and via PDF for the Airport to distribute to plan holders. Task 6.3 Bid Opening RS&H shall attend the bid opening at the Airport. (1 Person) Item 1G - 24 Task 6.4 Bid Review and Award Recommendation RS&H will receive construction bids and the bid form/proposals from the Airport. RS&H will prepare the bid tabulation, provide evaluation of checking for correctness, qualifications of apparent low bidder, DBE participation goals, etc., and submit a letter of recommendation of award to the Airport based on the qualified and responsive apparent low bidder. RS&H and the City will collaborate for determining responsiveness. RS&H cannot and does not guarantee that bids will not vary from the estimate. Task 6.5 Conformed Documents RS&H will prepare Conformed Documents for the Airport. The Conformed Documents incorporate the Bidding Documents and all Addenda issued, to complete an Issued for Construction set of documents. III MEETINGS AND PRESENTATIONS RS&H will prepare for and attend the following meetings: » Design Kickoff Meeting (1) » 30% Design Coordination Meeting (2) » 30% Design Review Meeting (1) » 60% Design Coordination Meeting (2) » 60% Design Review Meeting (1) » 90% Design Coordination Meeting (2) » 90% Design Review Meeting (1) » 100% Design Coordination Meeting (1) » Pre-Bid Conference (1) » Bid Opening (1) IV DELIVERABLES RS&H will provide the following deliverables: » 30% Design Submittal – Plans, Outline Specifications, Engineer’s Design Report, and Opinion of Probable Construction Cost (All Electronic) » 60% Design Submittal – Plans, Specifications, Engineer’s Design Report, and Opinion of Probable Construction Cost (All Electronic) » 90% Design Submittal – Plans, Specifications, Engineer’s Design Report, Opinion of Probable Construction Cost, and CSPP (All Electronic) » 100% Design (Bid Document) Submittal – 10 Sets of Plans, Specifications, Engineer’s Design Report, Opinion of Probable Construction Cost, and CSPP. Item 1G - 25 » Conformed Documents - 10 Sets of Plans and Specifications. All deliverables will also be provided in electronic format. V PROJECT SCHEDULE RS&H will provide the above referenced services within the following schedule (or as mutually agreed upon by the Airport and RS&H). This schedule is developed to meet a bid opening date of March 2023 and is based on RS&H receiving an NTP by March 1, 2022. If the NTP is issued later than indicated, then the remaining schedule will shift accordingly. Date Pre-Design/30% Deliverable June 3, 2022 30% Review Meeting June 15, 2022 60% Deliverable August 5, 2022 60% Review Meeting August 17, 2022 90% Deliverable October 7, 2022 90% Review Meeting October 19, 2022 100% Deliverable December 9, 2022 Pre-Bid Conference February 1, 2023 Bid Opening March 15, 2023 VI ASSUMPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS The following assumptions have been made for this Scope of Work: » The Airport will provide current operational data (type of aircraft and number of operations) for pavement design purposes. » Topographic survey, NDT Testing, and Geotechnical Investigations will be performed at night » Site inspection by RS&H will be completed during the day. » Project will be bid as a single bid package and bid schedule. » No rehabilitation will be performed to the taxiway shoulders except for necessary transitions and tie ins. To minimize impacts to existing shoulder pavement, the edge of full strength pavement will keep existing elevations to the extent practicable. » RS&H will coordinate with Airport staff, FAA control tower personnel, and tenants, as necessary, to determine the appropriate aircraft fleet mix to be used in the taxiway pavement design. » The proposed surface will generally be designed to match existing grades (with verification of FAA grade criteria and potential minor grade corrections). Item 1G - 26 » RS&H will submit the SWPPP drawings to the City Planning and Inspections Department for review and approval. The following items are excluded from this Scope of Work: » Environmental Services (including NEPA documentation) » Construction Phase Services » Drainage Study » Additional meetings other than those identified in Section III » Aerial survey » The preparation and submittal of the Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration (FAA Form 7460-1) for the Project to the FAA for Obstruction Evaluation / Airport Airspace Analysis (“OE/AAA”). » No subsurface utility engineering (SUE) services are included in this proposal. The intent will be to locate all utilities via review of record drawings and topographic survey of visible site elements. The Contract Documents will require the Contractor to perform any recommended test hole verifications. » Airfield lighting, guidance signage, and electrical vault modifications are not included in this scope of work. » No underdrains are anticipated to be installed for new / rehabilitated pavements. Underdrain design is excluded from this scope of work. » RS&H will prepare applicable SWPPP drawings for the Contractor to use in procurement of the necessary stormwater construction permits. A detailed SWPPP report along with Contractor preferred BMPs, the Notice of Intent (“NOI”), the Notice of Termination (“NOT”), will be prepared by the Contractor and is excluded from this scope of work. » National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”) documentation has previously been completed for this Project. No additional NEPA documentation is included in this scope of work. » RS&H will submit required documents to City Planning and Inspections Department for review and approval during the final design phase with the intent to obtain approval from the City Planning and Inspections Department before the construction documents are submitted for bid advertisement. RS&H will follow up the review and approval process with the City Planning and Inspections Department and will pick up approved documents and store them in a safe place. RS&H will not be responsible for pulling a construction permit; this will be completed by the Contractor and is excluded from this scope of work. » No other permits are anticipated for this Project. No other permits than those specifically included in this scope will be coordinated or applied for by RS&H. Item 1G - 27 » RS&H will only perform services/work related in any way to PFAS chemicals or substances possibly containing PFAS chemicals (including but not limited to sampling, handling, and remediating) to the extent the City of Palm Springs specifically directs, in writing, RS&H to perform such services/work, and RS&H shall not be liable for the nonperformance of such services/work. VII PROFESSIONAL SERVICE S FEE AND FEE TYPE For Not-To-Exceed (Cost-Plus) fee: RS&H will provide the above referenced services for a Maximum Cost-Plus Fee, Not to Exceed cost as shown in Attachment A. Item 1G - 28 ATTACHMENT A FEE SUMMARY AND BREAKDOWN OF COSTS Item 1G - 29 SUMMARY Hours Cost TOTAL RS&H BURDENED LABOR 2,367 439,624$ TOTAL OTHER DIRECT NON-SALARY COSTS 11,359$ TOTAL SPECIALTY SUBCONSULTANTS 144,502$ TOTAL SUBCONSULTANT MARKUP (3%)-$ TOTAL PREDESIGN, DESIGN, AND BID PHASE SERVICES 595,485$ TASK 1 PREDESIGN SERVICES 1.1 Predesign Meeting 24 7,425$ 1.2 Data Collection/Review of Existing Data 46 7,605$ 1.3 Site Review 64 8,699$ 1.4 Topographic Survey 12 2,606$ 1.5 Non Destructive Testing 40 7,163$ 1.6 Geotechnical Investigation 40 7,163$ 1.7 Project Management 36 9,902$ RS&H BURDENED LABOR 262 50,563$ OTHER DIRECT NON-SALARY COSTS 1,424$ SPECIALTY SUBCONSULTANTS 144,502$ SUBCONSULTANT MARKUP 0%-$ SUBTOTAL (PREDESIGN SERVICES)196,489$ TASK 2 30% DESIGN PHASE 2.1 Prepare 30% Design Documents 4 Cover, Index & Notes, Quantities 8 1,398$ 2 Safety and Security Notes and Details 12 1,833$ 1 Contract Layout Plan 14 2,173$ 1 Part 77 Airspace Layout Plan 14 2,173$ 6 Conceptual Phasing 44 7,684$ 10 Pavement Demolition Plans 44 6,577$ 10 Pavement and Geometry Plans 44 6,577$ PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA PROJECT PROPOSAL TAXIWAY W AND ASSOCIATED CONNECTOR TAXIWAY REHABILITATION PREDESIGN, DESIGN, AND BID PHASE SERVICES PROJECT PROPOSAL December 22, 2021Item 1G - 30 SUMMARY Hours Cost PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA PROJECT PROPOSAL TAXIWAY W AND ASSOCIATED CONNECTOR TAXIWAY REHABILITATION PREDESIGN, DESIGN, AND BID PHASE SERVICES 3 Typical Pavement Sections & Details 30 4,687$ 10 Pavement Marking Plans 32 5,027$ 3 Pavement Marking Details 22 3,571$ 30% Engineer's Report 42 6,652$ 30% Technical Specifications (outline)10 1,625$ 30% Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost 32 5,401$ 2.2 Outline/Draft Construction Safety and Phasing Plan (CSPP)24 3,911$ 2.3 30% Design Coordination Meetings 36 9,786$ 2.4 Quality Control Review 16 2,452$ 2.5 Submittal of 30% Documents 16 2,513$ 2.6 30% Design Review Meeting 28 7,747$ 2.7 Project Management 32 9,580$ RS&H BURDENED LABOR 500 91,368$ OTHER DIRECT NON-SALARY COSTS 856$ SPECIALTY SUBCONSULTANTS -$ SUBCONSULTANT MARKUP 0%-$ SUBTOTAL (30% DESIGN)92,224$ TASK 3 60% DESIGN PHASE 3.1 30% Review Comment Incorporation 34 5,920$ 3.2 Prepare 60% Design Documents 4 Cover, Index & Notes, Quantities 8 1,398$ 2 Safety and Security Notes and Details 14 2,173$ 2 Contract Layout Plan, Staging Area, and Details 18 3,136$ 1 Part 77 Airspace Layout Plan 6 1,180$ 1 Overall Phasing Plan 22 3,571$ 10 Phasing Plans 64 9,243$ 3 Horizontal & Vertical Control & Geotechnical Borings 8 1,398$ 10 Pavement Demolition Plans 16 2,268$ 2 Pavement Demolition Details 14 2,173$ 10 Geometry & Paving Plans 16 2,268$ PROJECT PROPOSAL December 22, 2021Item 1G - 31 SUMMARY Hours Cost PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA PROJECT PROPOSAL TAXIWAY W AND ASSOCIATED CONNECTOR TAXIWAY REHABILITATION PREDESIGN, DESIGN, AND BID PHASE SERVICES 3 Typical Pavement Sections & Details 16 2,796$ 20 Grading & Centerline Profile Plans 44 6,087$ 5 Erosion Control Plans and Details 10 1,738$ 1 Local Air Quality Management Plan 10 1,738$ 10 Spot Elevation Plans 36 5,462$ 10 Pavement Marking Plans 14 2,173$ 2 Pavement Marking Details 14 2,173$ 60% Engineer's Report 32 5,159$ 60% Div 0, 1 and Technical Specifications 32 5,159$ 60% Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost 26 3,893$ 3.3 60% Design Coordination Meetings 40 10,221$ 3.4 Safety Risk Management and Panel Participation Phasing Plan 24 4,721$ 3.5 Quality Control Review 16 2,452$ 3.6 Submittal of 60% Documents 16 2,513$ 3.7 60% Design Review Meeting 28 7,747$ 3.8 Project Management 48 15,103$ RS&H BURDENED LABOR 626 113,865$ OTHER DIRECT NON-SALARY COSTS 856$ SPECIALTY SUBCONSULTANTS -$ SUBCONSULTANT MARKUP 0%-$ SUBTOTAL (60% DESIGN)114,721$ TASK 4 90% Design Phase 4.1 60% Review Comment Incorporation 16 3,472$ 4.2 Prepare 90% Design Documents 4 Cover, Index & Notes, Quantities 14 2,578$ 2 Phasing Notes, Schedules, and Details 18 3,013$ 1 Contract Layout Plan, Staging Area, and Details 10 1,738$ 1 Part 77 Airspace Layout Plan 6 1,180$ 1 Overall Phasing Plans 22 3,289$ 10 Phasing Plans 36 5,462$ PROJECT PROPOSAL December 22, 2021Item 1G - 32 SUMMARY Hours Cost PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA PROJECT PROPOSAL TAXIWAY W AND ASSOCIATED CONNECTOR TAXIWAY REHABILITATION PREDESIGN, DESIGN, AND BID PHASE SERVICES 3 Horizontal & Vertical Control & Geotechnical Borings 10 1,738$ 10 Pavement Demolition Plans 6 1,180$ 2 Pavement Demolition Details 16 2,391$ 10 Geometry & Paving Plans 6 1,180$ 3 Typical Pavement Sections & Details 6 1,180$ 20 Grading & Centerline Profile Plans 24 3,384$ 5 Erosion Control Plans and Details 4 1,245$ 1 Local Air Quality Management Plan 10 1,738$ 10 Spot Elevation Plans 28 4,346$ 10 Pavement Marking Plans 8 1,398$ 2 Pavement Marking Details 8 1,398$ 8 Cross Sections 56 8,693$ 90% Engineer's Report 32 5,724$ 90% Div 0, 1 and Technical Specifications 28 5,175$ 90% Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost 20 3,118$ 4.3 Construction Safety and Phasing Plan 32 5,272$ 4.4 90% Design Coordination Meetings 40 10,221$ 4.5 Quality Control Review 16 2,452$ 4.6 Submittal of 90% Documents 16 2,513$ 4.7 90% Design Review Meeting 28 7,747$ 4.8 Project Management 32 9,580$ RS&H BURDENED LABOR 548 102,407$ OTHER DIRECT NON-SALARY COSTS 856$ SPECIALTY SUBCONSULTANTS -$ SUBCONSULTANT MARKUP 0%-$ SUBTOTAL (90% DESIGN)103,263$ TASK 5 100% DESIGN PHASE (BID DOCUMENTS) 5.1 90% Review Comment Incorporation 16 3,472$ 5.2 Prepare 100% Design (Bid) Documents 4 Cover, Index & Notes, Quantities 5 869$ PROJECT PROPOSAL December 22, 2021Item 1G - 33 SUMMARY Hours Cost PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA PROJECT PROPOSAL TAXIWAY W AND ASSOCIATED CONNECTOR TAXIWAY REHABILITATION PREDESIGN, DESIGN, AND BID PHASE SERVICES 2 Safety and Security Notes, Schedules, and Details 10 1,738$ 1 Contract Layout Plan, Staging Area, and Details 5 869$ 1 Part 77 Airspace Layout Plan 5 869$ 1 Overall Phasing Plan 5 869$ 10 Phasing Plans 13 1,862$ 3 Horizontal & Vertical Control & Geotechnical Borings 5 869$ 10 Pavement Demolition Plans 5 869$ 2 Pavement Demolition Details 7 1,087$ 10 Geometry & Paving Plans 7 1,087$ 3 Typical Pavement Sections & Details 6 1,180$ 20 Grading & Centerline Profile Plans 12 1,956$ 5 Erosion Control Plans and Details 5 869$ 1 Local Air Quality Management Plan 5 869$ 10 Spot Elevation Plans 8 1,398$ 10 Pavement Marking Plans 8 1,398$ 2 Pavement Marking Details 8 1,398$ 8 Cross Sections 12 1,956$ 90% Engineer's Report 14 2,060$ 90% Div 0, 1 and Technical Specifications 16 2,928$ 90% Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost 16 2,683$ Construction Safety and Phasing Plan 10 1,738$ 5.3 100% Design Coordination Meetings 24 6,073$ 5.4 Quality Control Review 16 2,452$ 5.5 Submittal of 100% Documents 12 1,956$ 5.6 Project Management 32 9,580$ RS&H BURDENED LABOR 287 54,952$ OTHER DIRECT NON-SALARY COSTS 3,403$ SPECIALTY SUBCONSULTANTS -$ SUBCONSULTANT MARKUP 0%-$ SUBTOTAL (100% DESIGN)58,355$ PROJECT PROPOSAL December 22, 2021Item 1G - 34 SUMMARY Hours Cost PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA PROJECT PROPOSAL TAXIWAY W AND ASSOCIATED CONNECTOR TAXIWAY REHABILITATION PREDESIGN, DESIGN, AND BID PHASE SERVICES TASK 6 BID PHASE 6.1 Pre-Bid Conference 16 4,981$ 6.2 Addenda 60 9,512$ 6.3 Bid Opening 10 3,113$ 6.4 Bid Review and Award Recommendation 24 4,495$ 6.5 Conformed Documents 34 4,368$ RS&H BURDENED LABOR 144 26,468$ OTHER DIRECT NON-SALARY COSTS 3,964$ SPECIALTY SUBCONSULTANTS -$ SUBCONSULTANT MARKUP 0%-$ SUBTOTAL (BID PHASE)30,432$ PROJECT PROPOSAL December 22, 2021Item 1G - 35 RS&H RS&H RS&H RS&H RS&H RS&H RS&H RS&H Hour JACKSON CHAVEZ CIFUENTES WILLIAMS BARRAGAN WARNER YEH KURTZ PROJECT OFFICER PROJECT CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL ADMIN. SCOPE / TASK TITLE MANAGER ENGINEER III ENGINEER I ENGINEER III ENGINEER III ENGINEER I ASSISTANT TOTAL TASK 1 PREDESIGN SERVICES 1.1 Predesign Meeting 8 8 8 24 1.2 Data Collection/Review of Existing Data 8 16 22 46 1.3 Site Review 16 16 16 16 64 1.4 Topographic Survey 4 8 12 1.5 Non Destructive Testing 4 8 28 40 1.6 Geotechnical Investigation 4 8 28 40 1.7 Project Management 4 24 8 36 TOTAL HOURS 12 52 64 38 72 0 16 8 262 RATE $149.46 $104.13 $56.89 $36.39 $54.44 $48.08 $34.14 $26.93 $64.56 TOTAL DIRECT LABOR $ $1,794 $5,415 $3,641 $1,383 $3,920 $0 $546 $215 $16,913 OVERHEAD @ 166.9%$28,232 PROFIT @ 12.0%$5,417 TOTAL BURDENED LABOR @ 2.99 $50,563 OTHER DIRECT NON-SALARY COSTS RS&H LUMP SUM EXPENSES (Schematic Design) TRANSPORTATION 4 Trips @ 250 Miles @ 0.56$ -->$560.00 HOTEL (SITE INVESTIGATION)1 Trip(s)6 People 144.00$ /Night -->$864.00 REPRODUCTION # DWGS #PAGES #SETS @ @ $1.50 $0.25 Drawings $0 Reports/Specifications $0 TOTAL REPRODUCTION $0 # PCKGS # PCKGS POSTAGE/DELIVERY @ @ $15.00 $3.00 Drawings and Specifications $0 TOTAL POSTAGE/DELIVERY $0 SUBCONSULTANTS EFFORTS (see attached proposals) PSOMAS (TASK 1.4 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY) $58,490 ARA (TASK 1.5 NDT TESTING) $39,300 PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT SUBMITTAL WILL BE ELECTRONIC SUBMITTAL WILL BE ELECTRONIC Taxiway W and Associated Connector Taxiways Pre-Design, Final Design, and Bid Phase Services PROJECT PROPOSAL PROJECT PROPOSAL December 20, 2021Item 1G - 36 RS&H RS&H RS&H RS&H RS&H RS&H RS&H RS&H Hour JACKSON CHAVEZ CIFUENTES WILLIAMS BARRAGAN WARNER YEH KURTZ PROJECT OFFICER PROJECT CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL ADMIN. SCOPE / TASK TITLE MANAGER ENGINEER III ENGINEER I ENGINEER III ENGINEER III ENGINEER I ASSISTANT TOTAL MB PRO (TASK 1.6 GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION)$46,712 SUB MARKUP $0 ODC Total $145,926 TOTAL PROPOSED FEE FOR:TASK 1 PREDESIGN SERVICES $196,489 TASK 2 30% DESIGN PHASE 2.1 Prepare 30% Design Documents 4 Cover, Index & Notes, Quantities 2 2 4 8 2 Safety and Security Notes and Details 2 2 8 12 1 Contract Layout Plan 2 4 8 14 1 Part 77 Airspace Layout Plan 2 4 8 14 6 Conceptual Phasing 4 4 12 24 44 10 Pavement Demolition Plans 4 16 24 44 10 Pavement and Geometry Plans 4 16 24 44 3 Typical Pavement Sections & Details 4 10 16 30 10 Pavement Marking Plans 4 12 16 32 3 Pavement Marking Details 4 6 12 22 30% Engineer's Report 6 16 16 4 42 30% Technical Specifications (outline)2 4 4 10 30% Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost 2 4 8 16 2 32 2.2 Outline/Draft Construction Safety and Phasing Plan (CSPP)4 8 12 24 2.3 30% Design Coordination Meetings 8 12 12 4 36 2.4 Quality Control Review 8 8 16 2.5 Submittal of 30% Documents 2 6 8 16 2.6 30% Design Review Meeting 8 8 8 4 28 2.7 Project Management 4 24 4 32 TOTAL HOURS 26 94 146 200 8 8 0 18 500 RATE $149.46 $104.13 $56.89 $36.39 $54.44 $48.08 $34.14 $26.93 $61.13 TOTAL DIRECT LABOR $ $3,886 $9,788 $8,306 $7,278 $436 $385 $0 $485 $30,563 OVERHEAD @ 166.9%$51,016 PROFIT @ 12.0%$9,789 TOTAL BURDENED LABOR @ 2.99 $91,368 OTHER DIRECT NON-SALARY COSTS EXPENSES TRANSPORTATION 2 Trips @ 250 Miles @ 0.56$ -->$280.00 HOTEL (MEETINGS)2 Trip(s)2 People 144.00$ /Night -->$576.00 REPRODUCTION # DWGS #PAGES #SETS @ @ $1.50 $0.25 Drawings $0 Reports/Specifications $0 TOTAL REPRODUCTION $0 SUBMITTAL WILL BE ELECTRONIC PROJECT PROPOSAL December 20, 2021Item 1G - 37 RS&H RS&H RS&H RS&H RS&H RS&H RS&H RS&H Hour JACKSON CHAVEZ CIFUENTES WILLIAMS BARRAGAN WARNER YEH KURTZ PROJECT OFFICER PROJECT CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL ADMIN. SCOPE / TASK TITLE MANAGER ENGINEER III ENGINEER I ENGINEER III ENGINEER III ENGINEER I ASSISTANT TOTAL # PCKGS # PCKGS POSTAGE/DELIVERY @ @ $15.00 $3.00 Drawings and Specifications $0 TOTAL POSTAGE/DELIVERY $0 ODC Total $856 TOTAL PROPOSED FEE FOR:TASK 2 30% DESIGN PHASE $92,224 TASK 3 60% DESIGN PHASE 3.1 30% Review Comment Incorporation 2 4 12 16 34 3.2 Prepare 60% Design Documents 4 Cover, Index & Notes, Quantities 2 2 4 8 2 Safety and Security Notes and Details 2 4 8 14 2 Contract Layout Plan, Staging Area, and Details 4 6 8 18 1 Part 77 Airspace Layout Plan 2 2 2 6 1 Overall Phasing Plan 4 6 12 22 10 Phasing Plans 4 24 36 64 3 Horizontal & Vertical Control & Geotechnical Borings 2 2 4 8 10 Pavement Demolition Plans 2 2 12 16 2 Pavement Demolition Details 2 4 8 14 10 Geometry & Paving Plans 2 2 12 16 3 Typical Pavement Sections & Details 4 4 8 16 20 Grading & Centerline Profile Plans 4 8 32 44 5 Erosion Control Plans and Details 2 4 4 10 1 Local Air Quality Management Plan 2 4 4 10 10 Spot Elevation Plans 4 12 20 36 10 Pavement Marking Plans 2 4 8 14 2 Pavement Marking Details 2 4 8 14 60% Engineer's Report 4 16 8 4 32 60% Div 0, 1 and Technical Specifications 4 16 8 4 32 60% Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost 4 6 12 4 26 3.3 60% Design Coordination Meetings 8 12 12 8 40 3.4 Safety Risk Management and Panel Participation Phasing Plan 8 8 8 24 3.5 Quality Control Review 8 8 16 3.6 Submittal of 60% Documents 2 6 8 16 3.7 60% Design Review Meeting 8 8 8 4 28 3.8 Project Management 8 36 4 48 TOTAL HOURS 26 128 178 258 8 8 0 20 626 RATE $149.46 $104.13 $56.89 $36.39 $54.44 $48.08 $34.14 $26.93 $60.84 TOTAL DIRECT LABOR $ $3,886 $13,329 $10,126 $9,389 $436 $385 $0 $539 $38,088 OVERHEAD @ 166.9%$63,577 PROFIT @ 12.0%$12,200 TOTAL BURDENED LABOR @ 2.99 $113,865 OTHER DIRECT NON-SALARY COSTS SUBMITTAL WILL BE ELECTRONIC PROJECT PROPOSAL December 20, 2021Item 1G - 38 RS&H RS&H RS&H RS&H RS&H RS&H RS&H RS&H Hour JACKSON CHAVEZ CIFUENTES WILLIAMS BARRAGAN WARNER YEH KURTZ PROJECT OFFICER PROJECT CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL ADMIN. SCOPE / TASK TITLE MANAGER ENGINEER III ENGINEER I ENGINEER III ENGINEER III ENGINEER I ASSISTANT TOTAL RS&H LUMP SUM EXPENSES (Schematic Design) TRANSPORTATION 2 Trips @ 250 Miles @ 0.56$ -->$280.00 HOTEL (MEETINGS)2 Trip(s)2 People 144.00$ /Night -->$576.00 REPRODUCTION # DWGS #PAGES #SETS @ @ $1.50 $0.25 Drawings $0 Reports/Specifications $0 TOTAL REPRODUCTION $0 # PCKGS # PCKGS POSTAGE/DELIVERY @ @ $15.00 $3.00 Drawings and Specifications $0 TOTAL POSTAGE/DELIVERY $0 ODC Total $856 TOTAL PROPOSED FEE FOR:TASK 3 60% DESIGN PHASE $114,721 TASK 4 90% Design Phase 4.1 60% Review Comment Incorporation 2 4 4 6 16 4.2 Prepare 90% Design Documents 4 Cover, Index & Notes, Quantities 4 4 6 14 2 Phasing Notes, Schedules, and Details 4 4 10 18 1 Contract Layout Plan, Staging Area, and Details 2 4 4 10 1 Part 77 Airspace Layout Plan 2 2 2 6 1 Overall Phasing Plans 2 8 12 22 10 Phasing Plans 4 12 20 36 3 Horizontal & Vertical Control & Geotechnical Borings 2 4 4 10 10 Pavement Demolition Plans 2 2 2 6 2 Pavement Demolition Details 2 4 10 16 10 Geometry & Paving Plans 2 2 2 6 3 Typical Pavement Sections & Details 2 2 2 6 20 Grading & Centerline Profile Plans 2 6 16 24 5 Erosion Control Plans and Details 4 4 1 Local Air Quality Management Plan 2 4 4 10 10 Spot Elevation Plans 4 8 16 28 10 Pavement Marking Plans 2 2 4 8 2 Pavement Marking Details 2 2 4 8 8 Cross Sections 8 16 32 56 90% Engineer's Report 8 12 8 4 32 90% Div 0, 1 and Technical Specifications 8 12 8 28 90% Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost 4 4 8 4 20 4.3 Construction Safety and Phasing Plan 4 16 12 32 4.4 90% Design Coordination Meetings 8 12 12 8 40 4.5 Quality Control Review 8 8 16 SUBMITTAL WILL BE ELECTRONIC SUBMITTAL WILL BE ELECTRONIC PROJECT PROPOSAL December 20, 2021Item 1G - 39 RS&H RS&H RS&H RS&H RS&H RS&H RS&H RS&H Hour JACKSON CHAVEZ CIFUENTES WILLIAMS BARRAGAN WARNER YEH KURTZ PROJECT OFFICER PROJECT CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL ADMIN. SCOPE / TASK TITLE MANAGER ENGINEER III ENGINEER I ENGINEER III ENGINEER III ENGINEER I ASSISTANT TOTAL 4.6 Submittal of 90% Documents 2 6 8 16 4.7 90% Design Review Meeting 8 8 8 4 28 4.8 Project Management 4 24 4 32 TOTAL HOURS 22 126 160 200 8 8 0 24 548 RATE $149.46 $104.13 $56.89 $36.39 $54.44 $48.08 $34.14 $26.93 $62.51 TOTAL DIRECT LABOR $ $3,288 $13,120 $9,102 $7,278 $436 $385 $0 $646 $34,255 OVERHEAD @ 166.9%$57,179 PROFIT @ 12.0%$10,972 TOTAL BURDENED LABOR @ 2.99 $102,407 OTHER DIRECT NON-SALARY COSTS RS&H LUMP SUM EXPENSES (Schematic Design) TRANSPORTATION 2 Trips @ 250 Miles @ 0.56$ -->$280.00 HOTEL (MEETINGS)2 Trip(s)2 People 144.00$ /Night -->$576.00 REPRODUCTION # DWGS #PAGES #SETS @ @ $1.50 $0.25 Drawings $0 Reports/Specifications $0 TOTAL REPRODUCTION $0 # PCKGS # PCKGS POSTAGE/DELIVERY @ @ $15.00 $3.00 Drawings and Specifications $0 TOTAL POSTAGE/DELIVERY $0 ODC Total $856 TOTAL PROPOSED FEE FOR:TASK 4 90% Design Phase $103,263 TASK 5 100% DESIGN PHASE (BID DOCUMENTS) 5.1 90% Review Comment Incorporation 2 4 4 6 16 5.2 Prepare 100% Design (Bid) Documents 4 Cover, Index & Notes, Quantities 1 2 2 5 2 Safety and Security Notes, Schedules, and Details 2 4 4 10 1 Contract Layout Plan, Staging Area, and Details 1 2 2 5 1 Part 77 Airspace Layout Plan 1 2 2 5 1 Overall Phasing Plan 1 2 2 5 10 Phasing Plans 1 4 8 13 3 Horizontal & Vertical Control & Geotechnical Borings 1 2 2 5 10 Pavement Demolition Plans 1 2 2 5 2 Pavement Demolition Details 1 2 4 7 10 Geometry & Paving Plans 1 2 4 7 3 Typical Pavement Sections & Details 2 2 2 6 SUBMITTAL WILL BE ELECTRONIC SUBMITTAL WILL BE ELECTRONIC PROJECT PROPOSAL December 20, 2021Item 1G - 40 RS&H RS&H RS&H RS&H RS&H RS&H RS&H RS&H Hour JACKSON CHAVEZ CIFUENTES WILLIAMS BARRAGAN WARNER YEH KURTZ PROJECT OFFICER PROJECT CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL ADMIN. SCOPE / TASK TITLE MANAGER ENGINEER III ENGINEER I ENGINEER III ENGINEER III ENGINEER I ASSISTANT TOTAL 20 Grading & Centerline Profile Plans 2 4 6 12 5 Erosion Control Plans and Details 1 2 2 5 1 Local Air Quality Management Plan 1 2 2 5 10 Spot Elevation Plans 2 2 4 8 10 Pavement Marking Plans 2 2 4 8 2 Pavement Marking Details 2 2 4 8 8 Cross Sections 2 4 6 12 90% Engineer's Report 2 4 4 4 14 90% Div 0, 1 and Technical Specifications 4 8 4 16 90% Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost 4 4 4 4 16 Construction Safety and Phasing Plan 2 4 4 10 5.3 100% Design Coordination Meetings 4 8 8 4 24 5.4 Quality Control Review 8 8 16 5.5 Submittal of 100% Documents 2 4 6 12 5.6 Project Management 4 24 4 32 TOTAL HOURS 10 75 80 90 8 8 0 16 287 RATE $149.46 $104.13 $56.89 $36.39 $54.44 $48.08 $34.14 $26.93 $64.05 TOTAL DIRECT LABOR $ $1,495 $7,810 $4,551 $3,275 $436 $385 $0 $431 $18,382 OVERHEAD @ 166.9%$30,683 PROFIT @ 12.0%$5,888 TOTAL BURDENED LABOR @ 2.99 $54,952 OTHER DIRECT NON-SALARY COSTS RS&H LUMP SUM EXPENSES (Schematic Design) TRANSPORTATION 1 Trips @ 250 Miles @ 0.56$ -->$140.00 HOTEL (MEETING)1 Trip(s)2 People 144.00$ /Night -->$288.00 REPRODUCTION # DWGS #PAGES #SETS @ @ $1.50 $0.25 Drawings 103 10 $1,545 Reports/Specifications 500 10 $1,250 TOTAL REPRODUCTION $2,795 # PCKGS # PCKGS POSTAGE/DELIVERY @ @ $15.00 $3.00 Drawings and Specifications 10 10 $180 TOTAL POSTAGE/DELIVERY $180 ODC Total $3,403 TOTAL PROPOSED FEE FOR:TASK 5 100% DESIGN PHASE (BID DOCUMENTS)$58,355 TASK 6 BID PHASE PROJECT PROPOSAL December 20, 2021Item 1G - 41 RS&H RS&H RS&H RS&H RS&H RS&H RS&H RS&H Hour JACKSON CHAVEZ CIFUENTES WILLIAMS BARRAGAN WARNER YEH KURTZ PROJECT OFFICER PROJECT CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL ADMIN. SCOPE / TASK TITLE MANAGER ENGINEER III ENGINEER I ENGINEER III ENGINEER III ENGINEER I ASSISTANT TOTAL 6.1 Pre-Bid Conference 16 16 6.2 Addenda 8 16 16 4 16 60 6.3 Bid Opening 10 10 6.4 Bid Review and Award Recommendation 8 8 8 24 6.5 Conformed Documents 2 8 16 8 34 TOTAL HOURS 0 44 32 16 16 0 4 32 144 RATE $149.46 $104.13 $56.89 $36.39 $54.44 $48.08 $34.14 $26.93 $61.48 TOTAL DIRECT LABOR $ $0 $4,582 $1,820 $582 $871 $0 $137 $862 $8,854 OVERHEAD @ 166.9%$14,779 PROFIT @ 12.0%$2,836 TOTAL BURDENED LABOR @ 2.99 $26,468 OTHER DIRECT NON-SALARY COSTS RS&H LUMP SUM EXPENSES (60% thru Bid) TRANSPORTATION 1 Trips @ 250 Miles @ 0.56$ -->$140.00 HOTEL (MEETING)1 Trip(s)1 People 144.00$ /Night -->$144.00 REPRODUCTION # DWGS #PAGES #SETS @ @ $1.50 $0.25 Drawings 150 10 $2,250 Reports/Specifications 500 10 $1,250 TOTAL REPRODUCTION $3,500 # PCKGS # PCKGS POSTAGE/DELIVERY @ @ $15.00 $3.00 Drawings and Specifications 10 10 $180 TOTAL POSTAGE/DELIVERY $180 ODC Total $3,964 TOTAL PROPOSED FEE FOR:TASK 6 BID PHASE $30,432 GRAND TOTAL PROPOSED FEE FOR:ALL SERVICES PRE-DESIGN through BIDDING $595,485 Task 8 Resident Project Representative (NOT INCLUDED) Task 7 Construction Adminstration (NOT INCLUDED) PROJECT PROPOSAL December 20, 2021Item 1G - 42 ATTACHMENT B TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY – SUBCONSULTANT (PSOMAS) PROPOSAL Item 1G - 43 1650 Spruce Street Suite 400 Riverside, CA 92507 Tel 951.787.8421 Fax 951.682.3379 www.psomas.com December 9, 2021 Byron Chavez, PE RS&H 5901 W. Century Blvd, Suite 1030 Los Angeles, CA 90045 Subject: Survey Services – Palm Springs International Airport (PSP) Taxiway W Associated Connector Taxiway Rehabilitation Dear Bryon: Psomas sincerely appreciates the opportunity to present the enclosed proposal for Surveying Services related to the Palm Springs International Airport (PSP). Our goal is to continue to be an outstanding Consultant and further develop our relationship by demonstrating responsiveness, communication and cooperation required for a successful project. We anticipate that our level of knowledge and understanding with these services as well as our experience with aviation projects will prove to be very valuable to the project team. Our proposal includes the following information: · Scope of Services - Per the attached request dated December 6, 2021 · Time and Material Estimate – see attached · Delivery Schedule Once again, thank you for considering Psomas for this project. I can be reached at the office number below, by e-mail at william.estepa @psomas.com, or on my cell phone at (714) 795-9207 to answer any questions you may have regarding this proposal. Sincerely, William Estepa, PLS Project Manager Item 1G - 44 December 9, 2021 Byron Chavez, PE RS&H Survey Services – Palm Springs International Airport (PSP) Taxiway W Associated Connector Taxiway Rehabilitation Project Understanding: We understand that the survey work will be prformed outside the area of movement and some coordination with the airport operation will be required for Aircraft Taxiing toward Taxiway W. This work will be done during the night. Item 1G - 45 PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (PSP) TAXIWAY W AND ASSOCIATED CONNECTOR TAXIWAY REHABILITATION TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY SCOPE OF SERVICES DECEMBER 6, 2021 Field Survey: · Establish survey controls within the vicinity of the project base on LAWA Survey Controls. The basis of survey is the North American Datum of 1983 (NAD 83) (Epoch 2010) and North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD 88), State Plane Coordinates, California Coordinate System 1983, Zone 6, US survey foot. Set secondary control monuments to be set for the topo survey. · Perform detailed field surveys of existing pavement, utilities, drainage features, lights, signs, structures, and other topographic features on Taxiway W and associated connector taxiways. See Attachment A for limits of survey. The work shall consist of the following tasks: 1. Spot elevations along existing taxiway and aprons shall be taken at maximum 25-foot grid and breaklines within the survey limits as appropriate. 2. Accurately locate any inlets, manholes, utilities, edge and centerline lights, signs, Navaids, edges of pavement, surface expressions of underground conduits, valves, meters, fire hydrants, etc. which are within the survey limits and provide top, bottom and invert elevation for each structure. 3. Pipe sizes entering and exiting all structures shall be accurately noted. If drainage structures are outside the envelope of the survey, the Surveyor shall move outside the survey limits and obtain all necessary data on the drainage system. 4. Photos shall be taken if drainage structures are outside the envelope of the survey. 5. Survey all taxiway and apron pavement markings within the survey limits. 6. All pavement grades shall be measured to the nearest hundredth of a foot and ground shots to the nearest tenth of a foot. 7. All foot contours shall be interpolated and shown on the survey drawings and electronic files. All foot contours shall be defined as three (3) dimensional elements) and have the appropriate contour elevation definition. The contours shall take into account all faults, break lines, etc. 8. Fillets at all pavement intersections shall be supplemented with sufficient intermediate locations and elevations to allow accurate contouring of the intersections. 9. All field notes shall be reduced and checked for allowable survey tolerances before being transmitted to the engineer for design. 10. Boring locations will be provided by RSH, Inc. and staked by the surveyor, where applicable. (Assumes 20 Borings with 1 site visit) Deliverables: 1. Electronic Survey information shall be provided in a compatible AutoCAD 2020 format and a signed and sealed .PDF of survey information by a registered land surveyor. a. Drawing shall accurately depict all topographic and planimetric features in the defined area indicating X, Y, and Z coordinates, point numbers, and point descriptions. b. Surface model files shall be submitted in a file supported by standard civil design software (.XML, .DTM, or .DEM). c. Surveyor shall submit point data as a comma delineated .TXT file, (Point, Northing, Easting, Elevation, and Description). Item 1G - 46 2. Surveyor shall provide copies of any field sketches that were prepared during the survey. a. All sketches should include a North arrow on each page. b. All improvements shall be clearly and accurately labeled with descriptions and point numbers. c. Sketches should include inverts (with point numbers) of all utilities including the type and size of structure, pipe size, pipe type and direction of pipes. Airport Security Requirements: · Comply with all federal, state, local, and airport requirements for work performed within aircraft operation areas and controlled areas. · Survey crew shall coordinate with PSP Airport Operations prior to conducting survey. · Work shall be assumed to be completed during nighttime hours. Light plants and other means to complete the work shall be part of the proposal. o Nighttime work for shall be anticipated to be from 2000-0600 · Survey crew must be badged, and driver trained to PSP requirements. · Provide orange traffic cones as necessary to block off areas of pavements as coordinated with PSP Airport Operations. Schedule: Provide anticipated durations for completion of the work. Note: Assume coordination with PSP Airport Operations will be needed, which is anticipated to take 2-3 weeks after NTP prior to any field work taking place. Fee Structure: Provide a fee structure for the proposed scope of services showing anticipated tasks, assigned personnel, hourly rates, loaded rates, hours anticipated other direct costs, etc. to complete all work necessary. Fee structure shall be on a time and material basis not to exceed the specified amount. Item 1G - 47 © 2021 Microsoft Corporation © 2021 Maxar ©CNES (2021) Distribution Airbus DS (2021) Distribution Airbus DS © 2021 Microsoft Corporation © 2021 Maxar ©CNES (2021) Distribution Airbus DS © 2021 Microsoft Corporation © 2021 Maxar ©CNES (2021) Distribution Airbus DS © 2021 Microsoft Corporation © 2021 Maxar ©CNES (2021) Distribution Airbus DS © 2021 Microsoft Corporation © 2021 Maxar ©CNES (2021) Distribution Airbus DS TAXIWAY WTAXIWAY J TAXIWAY KTAXIWAY WTAXIWAY L RUNWAY 13R-31LDATE: 11/22/21PROJECT No: 2264411007DRAWN BY/REVIEWED BY: BS/MTPALM SPRINGSINTERNATIONAL AIRPORTPALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIADRAFTSCALE 1" = 125'250'125'0125'NLEGENDREHABILITATION AREASURVEY LIMITSSURVEY AREA (SF)AREA 1625,680AREA 2783,528AREA 3772,191TOTAL2,181,399Item 1G - 48 © 2021 Microsoft Corporation © 2021 Maxar ©CNES (2021) Distribution Airbus DS ration © 2021 Maxar ©CNES (2021) Distribution Airbus DS crosoft Corporation © 2021 Maxar ©CNES (2021) Distribution Airbus DS © 2021 Microsoft Corporation © 2021 Maxar ©CNES (2021) Distribution Airbus DS © 2021 Microsoft Corporation © 2021 Maxar ©CNES (2021) Distribution Airbus DS © 2021 Microsoft Corporation © 2021 Maxar ©CNES (2021) Distribution Airbus DS © 2021 Microsoft Corporation © 2021 Maxar ©CNES (2021) Distribution Airbus DS © 2021 Microsoft Corporation © 2021 Maxar ©CNES (2021) Distribution Airbus DS © 2021 Microsoft Corporation © 2021 Maxar ©CNES (2021) Distribution Airbus DS TAXIWAY DTAXIWAY WTAXIWAY CRUNWAY 13R-31LTAX IWAY C -1TAXIWAY HTAXIWAY W-1 TAXIWAY W2 TAXIWAY CTAXIWAY WARFFFACILITYAIR CARRIER APRONTAXIWAY H TAXIWAY W3 TAXIW A Y G DATE: 11/22/21PROJECT No: 2264411007DRAWN BY/REVIEWED BY: BS/MTPALM SPRINGSINTERNATIONAL AIRPORTPALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIADRAFTSCALE 1" = 125'250'125'0125'NTAXIWAY W REHABPARTIAL PLANAREA 2LEGENDREHABILITATION AREASURVEY LIMITSSURVEY AREA (SF)AREA 1625,680AREA 2783,528AREA 3772,191TOTAL2,181,399Item 1G - 49 ration © 2021 Maxar ©CNES (2021) Distribution Airbus DS © 2021 Microsoft Corporation © 2021 Maxar ©CNES (2021) Distribution Airbus DS © 2021 Microsoft Corporation © 2021 Maxar ©CNES (2021) Distribution Airbus DS © 2021 Microsoft Corporation © 2021 Maxar ©CNES (2021) Distribution Airbus DS © 2021 Microsoft Corporation © 2021 Maxar ©CNES (2021) Distribution Airbus DS ation © 2021 Maxar ©CNES (2021) Distribution Airbus DS © 2021 Microsoft Corporation © 2021 Maxar ©CNES (2021) Distribution Airbus DS © 2021 Microsoft Corporation © 2021 Maxar ©CNES (2021) Distribution Airbus DS © 2021 Microsoft Corporation © 2021 Maxar ©CNES (2021) Distribution Airbus DS crosoft Corporation © 2021 Maxar ©CNES (2021) Distribution Airbus DS © 2021 Microsoft Corporation © 2021 Maxar ©CNES (2021) Distribution Airbus DS TAXIWAY B TAXIWAY WT A X I W A Y A TAXIWAY ARUNWAY 13R-31LTAXIWAY BT A X I W A Y A 1 TAXIWAY B DATE: 11/22/21PROJECT No: 2264411007DRAWN BY/REVIEWED BY: BS/MTPALM SPRINGSINTERNATIONAL AIRPORTPALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIADRAFTSCALE 1" = 125'250'125'0125'NTAXIWAY W REHABPARTIAL PLANAREA 3LEGENDREHABILITATION AREASURVEY LIMITSSURVEY AREA (SF)AREA 1625,680AREA 2783,528AREA 3772,191TOTAL2,181,399Item 1G - 50 ATTACHMENT C NON DESTRUCTIVE TESTING – SUBCONSULTANT (ARA) PROPOSAL Item 1G - 51 December 17, 2021 Byron Chavez, PE Aviation Engineer 5901 W. Century Blvd, Suite 1030, Los Angeles, CA 90045 O 310-692-2060 | M 405-630-9586 Email: Byron.Chavez@rsandh.com Subject: Proposal for HWD and GRR Testing and Analysis at Palm Springs International Airport in Palm Springs, CA Dear Mr. Chavez: Applied Research Associates (ARA), Inc. appreciates the opportunity to submit this proposal for Heavy Weight Deflectometer (HWD) and Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) testing and analysis, on several features at Palm Springs Int. Airport (PSP) in Palm Springs, CA. Our proposed scope of services is detailed on the following pages and is summarized below.  Perform non-destructive structural testing with a Heavy Weight Deflectometer (HWD).  Perform Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) data collection to determine the pavement layer thicknesses information and reduce the pavement cores needed.  Determine most optimal pavement coring locations.  Perform backcalculation analysis to estimate the pavement layer moduli.  Determine the correlated CBR values for the subgrade layer.  Determine the Pavement Classification Number (PCN) and perform Aircraft Classification Number (ACN) sensitivity analysis, and Pavement Classification Rating (PCR) and Aircraft Classification Rating (ACR).  Determine pavement Structural Adequacy using Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) computer software, FAARFIELD.  Provide a detailed report. Please review this proposal when you get a chance. Please do not hesitate to contact us in case of any questions or concerns. Thank you for the opportunity to provide our services. Sincerely, Alvaro Ulloa, PhD, PE Principal Engineer I Email: aulloa@ara.com Phone: 775 240-1315 Michael J. Harrell, P.E. Principal Engineer I Item 1G - 52 1 PROJECT UNDERSTANDING Applied Research Associates, Inc. (ARA) understands that pavement structural evaluation is needed on Taxiway W, Taxiway connectors A, B, G, J, K, A1, 1, 2 and the Apron Terminal segment 02A at Palm Springs Int. Airport (PSP) in Palm Springs, CA. The pavement structural evaluation will be performed using a Heavy Weight Deflectometer (HWD) system, and pavement layer thicknesses will be estimated using a Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) system, as optional task. Data collected in the field will be analyzed by our experienced team of pavement engineers, and will be submitted to RS&H. 2 SCOPE OF SERVICES HWD and GPR testing will be conducted as shown in Table 1. We propose to test on all the airport features at project level in accordance with FAA criteria. Table 1. Estimated Number of HWD Test Locations Feature Length (ft) Width (ft) Test Spacing (ft) Number of Test Lines # of Test Points Option 1: Two lines of testing on Taxiway W Taxiway W 9,900 75 100 2 198 Taxiway A (TA-05) 250 225 50 2 10 Taxiway B (TB-09) 250 90 50 2 10 Taxiway G (TG-02) 230 190 50 2 10 Taxiway J (TJ-07) 240 400 50 4 20 Taxiway K (TK-04) 240 400 50 4 20 Taxiway A1 (TA1-01 & -02) 1300 70 50 2 52 Taxiway 1 (TW1-03) 70 190 20 2 8 Taxiway 2 (TW2-01) 50 125 20 2 6 ATERM-02A 375 12 50 1 8 Total HWD Test Points 342 Option 2: Four lines of testing on Taxiway W Taxiway W 9,900 75 100 2 198 200 2 100 Taxiway A (TA-05) 250 225 50 2 10 Taxiway B (TB-09) 250 90 50 2 10 Taxiway G (TG-02) 230 190 50 2 10 Taxiway J (TJ-07) 240 400 50 4 20 Taxiway K (TK-04) 240 400 50 4 20 Taxiway A1 (TA1-01 & -02) 1300 70 50 2 52 Taxiway 1 (TW1-03) 70 190 20 2 8 Taxiway 2 (TW2-01) 50 125 20 2 6 ATERM-02A 375 12 50 1 8 Total HWD Test Points 442 Item 1G - 53 From Table 1, option 1 will require 2.5 days of data collection, while option 2 will require 3 days of data collection. At each test location, the HWD will apply two or three load drops (load levels to be determined after a review of the design aircraft mix, gear configuration and loads). In addition to the load-deflection data, the HWD records surface temperature, station, and GPS coordinates. The HWD testing locations will be staggered across test lines to maximize coverage. The HWD will have a reference calibration performed within a year prior to the date of the testing. Our proposal assumes that the HWD testing will be performed during night time, and in dry weather conditions. ARA highly recommends collecting GPR data along with the HWD testing. Pavement layer thicknesses are required to perform analysis of the load-deflection data. GPR data is continuous in nature and provides a high level of detail for all areas tested. In addition, by using the GPR technology, there is a significant reduction in the required number of pavement cores, which in turn translates into savings for the agency and less traffic disruption for the airport. Figure 1 shows the GPR integrated with the ARA’s HWD. Thickness information will be collected continuously with the GPR. The GPR works by emitting a series of radar waves to the pavement structure while the vehicle is traveling at traffic speed and collects the dielectric constants of the underlying structure. The GPR data will be analyzed using RADAN 7 software package to estimate the dielectric properties of the pavement and determine the layer thicknesses. The resulting correlated dielectric constants are then filtered to determine pavement thicknesses and types. The results must be calibrated through pavement cores at selected locations or current as-builts/construction history provided by Burns & McDonnell. Our HWD is fully integrated with the GPR system so that each HWD station corresponds to the same location from the GPR system. Furthermore, pavement thicknesses will be reported for every HWD tested station continuously which in turn increases the accuracy and quality of the pavement evaluation and design and increases the probability of successfully identifying any localized failure that might otherwise be missed by common destructive procedures. Figure 1. ARA HWD integrated with a GPR Backcalculation of the pavement layer moduli will be performed using ELMOD (Evaluation of Layer Moduli and Overlay Design) software that can provide backcalculated layer moduli and structural overlay requirements required over the design/analysis period. The layer moduli provide Item 1G - 54 an indication of material condition in the pavement structure. ELMOD is accepted for use by the FAA as shown in the FAA AC 150/5370-11B and it is used by 300+ public and private agencies nationwide and overseas. For every HWD test point collected along an airport feature, ARA will calculate the layer moduli using ELMOD. ARA will perform the ACN/PCN analysis and/or ACR/PCR using the COMFAA in accordance with the technical evaluation method of the FAA AC 150/5335-5C “Standardized Method of Reporting Airport Pavement Strength – PCN”, and the Draft FAA AC 150/5335-5D “Standardized Method of Reporting Airport Pavement Strength – PCR”. The structural adequacy of the airport features will also be determined using FAARFIELD in accordance with the technical evaluation method of AC 150/5320-6F “Airport Pavement Design and Evaluation”. The analysis results will be included in the final report. The pavement structural evaluation will include the following activities: 1. Perform nondestructive deflection testing on the airport features using ARA’s HWD. 2. Determine existing pavement layer thicknesses using ARA’s GPR, as optional task. If GPR is not selected as part of the scope of work, RS&H shall provide the layer thicknesses and types of the runway by means of pavement coring or as-builts drawings. 3. Recommend location for pavement coring 4. Determine backcalculated layer moduli. 5. Perform ACN/PCN, ACR/PCR and Structural Adequacy analysis. 6. Provide a report that details the analyses results. RS&H will need to provide ARA with the following: 1. Appropriate permissions and escort are required during the HWD and GPR testing. Our proposal does not include costs associated with security, screening, badging, and operator safety training, if needed. Additional costs may be incurred if additional tasks are required. 2. Pavement layer thicknesses and types obtained through cores or as-built plans is required for GPR calibration and analysis of HWD data. 3. Local contact numbers, meeting location and time. Figure 2. Airport Features to be Evaluated Item 1G - 55 3 PROJECT SCHEDULE We understand that RS&H has not finalized a testing schedule at the present time. Our team is committed to collaborating with RS&H on this project, and we are prepared to provide a flexible schedule for performing the field testing. Also please note that we require dry weather conditions to perform the testing, and that all field testing will be scheduled keeping the weather forecast under consideration. We anticipate that the testing will be conducted at night time, and that ARA’s HWD operator will not need to go through a badging and security clearance process. In addition, ARA assumes that the equipment based in California will be available to conduct testing. 4 DELIVERABLES ARA will provide the following deliverables as shown in Table 2. Table 2. Project Deliverables Deliverable Due Date Pavement Photos at HWD test locations One week after Testing KML files showing all locations tested One week after Testing Proposed pavement coring locations One week after Testing Pavement layer thicknesses by means of GPR, if selected as optional task One week after receiving the pavement coring info Draft Report Three weeks after pavement coring report and design aircraft mix has been provided to ARA Final Report After review of comments 5 PROJECT PRICE ARA will provide the services noted in this proposal on a fixed unit price basis as shown in the price breakdown in Table 3. Table 3. Price Breakdown for Option 1 Task Price HWD mobilization and Per Diem (2-way from Ventura, CA)* $2,700 HWD testing (3 days) $8,900 Project Management & Data Analysis $12,600 Report & Deliverables $4,600 GPR Testing & Analysis $8,000 TOTAL $36,800 * Mobilization assumes the HWD and GPR based in California are available to conduct testing. In case the HWD and GPR are not available, ARA will need to mobilize the equipment from Item 1G - 56 Austin, TX at additional charges. Total price will need to be modified in case additional mobilization is required. Table 4. Price Breakdown for Option 2 Task Price HWD mobilization and Per Diem (2-way from Ventura, CA)* $2,700 HWD testing (3 days) $8,900 Project Management & Data Analysis $14,400 Report & Deliverables $4,600 GPR Testing & Analysis $8,700 TOTAL $39,300 * Mobilization assumes the HWD and GPR based in California are available to conduct testing. In case the HWD and GPR are not available, ARA will need to mobilize the equipment from Austin, TX at additional charges. Total price will need to be modified in case additional mobilization is required. One (1) testing day is a maximum of eight (8) working hours either day or night. Overtime rates of $300 will be charged for each additional hour exceeding the 8-hour day. Standby time will be charged at $250 per hour. This proposal is valid for a period of 90 days from the date of the proposal. We reserve the right to review our scope if an agreement to provide our services has not been reached within the 90- day period. ARA will invoice monthly on a percent complete basis for payment to be made within 30 days of receipt of invoice (Net 30). 6 GROUND RULES AND ASSUMPTIONS ARA’s offering is based on the following ground rules and assumptions. Should any of these be adjusted during negotiations, the proposed offer, including pricing may be subject to change. 1. ARA anticipates a fixed unit price contract. 2. This proposal is valid for a period of 90 days from the date of this proposal. 3. ARA will submit invoices on a monthly basis on a percent complete basis with payment terms of net30. 4. ARA anticipates that the terms and conditions part of this proposal will govern. 5. We require dry weather conditions for testing. All field work will be scheduled keeping the weather forecast under consideration. 6. This proposal assumes that RS&H will perform the structural adequacy, ACN/PCN, ACR/PCR analysis of the different features. 7. ARA may charge a standby charge of $250/hour up to $1,500/day plus applicable hotel/per diem charges for all delays caused at no fault to ARA. This may include weather related delays after the project has started and/or airport requirements related delays resulting in a reduced work schedule. Item 1G - 57 7 TERMS & CONDITIONS Applied Research Associates, Inc. (ARA) agrees to perform the specified work with the professional skill and care ordinarily provided by firms practicing in the same or similar locality under the same or similar circumstances. The parties acknowledge that there has been an opportunity to negotiate the terms and conditions of this Agreement and agree to be bound accordingly. 1. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR ARA will act as an independent contractor and not as Client’s agent for any purpose whatsoever, and will have no authority to make any commitments on behalf of Client or to bind Client in any way whatsoever. 2. PROJECT SUPERVISION AND ASSIGNMENT ARA shall have wide discretion in the methods used to perform any assigned tasks unless specified otherwise. ARA will cooperate with the Client to the extent possible to arrange for consultations between the Client, ARA personnel, and others engaged in rendering services to the Client related to ARA’s performance under this agreement. ARA agrees that no tasks shall be performed or expenses incurred without specific authorization of the Client. 3. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS All data, information, software, hardware, and documents produced by ARA under this agreemen t shall remain the property of ARA and may not be used by the Client for any endeavor outside of the scope of this agreement without the written consent of ARA, unless otherwise noted in this agreement. 4. ACCESS TO PROJECT SITE If required for the performance of this effort, ARA will be granted timely access to the project site as needed. If traffic control or protection is required, it shall be provided by the Client or specific provisions will be made for ARA to provide traffic con trol or protection at an additional price. ARA will take precautions to minimize damage when performing its work, but ARA is not responsible for any items destroyed as a necessary part of the work. 5. PAYMENT ARA will invoice monthly and at the completion of the project, with payment due net 30 days. Interest will be charged on amounts outstanding more than 30 days. The interest rate will be 1½ percent per month, compounded until paid. In the event of late payment, the Client agrees to pay all collection costs, legal expenses and attorneys’ fees incurred by ARA in collecting payment, including interest. In the event that some portion of the invoice is disputed, payment for the undisputed portion of the invo ice will be made within 30 days. If the Parties are unable to reach agreement regarding the disposition of the disputed portions of the invoice within 21 days, the matter will be resolved according to the Dispute Resolution clause of this agreement. 6. HIDDEN CONDITIONS OR HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: If ARA has reason to believe that a hidden condition may exist, ARA shall notify the client who shall authorize and pay for all costs associated with the investigation of such condition and if necessary, all costs necessary to correct such condition. If (a) the client fails to authorize such investigation of the correction after due notification, or (b) ARA has no reason to believe that such condition exists, the Client is responsible for all risks associated with this condition, and ARA shall not be responsible for the existing condition nor any resulting damages to persons or property. ARA shall have no responsibility for the discovery, presence, handling, removal, disposal or exposure of persons to hazardous materials of any form. 7. TERMINATION OF SERVICES: This agreement may be terminated upon 10 days written notice by either party. In the event of termination, the Client shall pay ARA for all services performed to the date of termination, all reimbursable expenses and reasonable termination expenses. 8. CONFIDENTIALITY Each party agrees not to use the other’s proprietary information for any purpose other than for the performance of this Agreement. Proprietary information is defined as information concerning techniques, processes, inventions, research and development, and cost data in written form with each sheet thereof marked with an appropriate legend indicating its proprietary nature and delivered by one party to another. Any other use of such proprietary information by the recipient shall be made only upon receipt of the prior written consent from an authorized representative of the other party. Item 1G - 58 9. INDEMNIFICATION Each party (indemnitor) shall indemnify and hold harmless the other party (indemnitee) from and against any and all (includin g third party) claims, damages, losses and expenses (including reasonable attorney’s fees) arising out of or resulting from the performance of services, to the proportional extent that any such claims, damage, loss or expense is caused by the negligent act or omission and/or liability of the indemnitor, anyone directly or indirectly employed by the indemnitor. 10. CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES Neither Party shall be liable to the other for consequential damages, including, without limitation, loss of use or loss of p rofits, incurred by one another or their subsidiaries or successors, regardless of whether such damages are caused by breach of contract, willful misconduct, negligent act or omission, or other wrongful act of either of them. 11. FORCE MAJEURE Neither party shall be liable for any failure of or delay in performance of its obligations under this Subcontract to the extent such failure or delay is due to circumstances beyond its reasonable control, including, without limitation, acts of God, acts of a public enemy, fires, floods, wars, civil disturbances, sabotage, accidents, insurrections, blockades, embargoes, storms, explosions, labor disputes , acts of any governmental body, failure or delay of third parties or governmental bodies from whom a party is obtai ning or must obtain approvals, authorizations, licenses, franchises or permits, or inability to obtain labor, materials, power, equipment, or transportation (collectively referred to herein as "Force Majeure"). Each party shall use its reasonable efforts to minim ize the duration and consequences of any failure of or delay in performance resulting from a Force Majeure event. 12. GOVERNING LAW This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New Mexico, excluding its principles of conflicts of laws. The United Nations Convention for the International Sale of Goods is expressly excluded from this Agreement, and shall have no force or effect on the parties. 13. DISPUTE RESOLUTION Any controversy or claim arising out of or relating to this agreement, or breach thereof, which may be properly submitted to arbitration, shall be settled by arbitration. The substantially prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the non-prevailing party all costs and expenses and attorney’s fees it incurred in connection with any suit or legal or administrative action or appeal with respect to this order or the transaction under it. 14. NO THIRD PARTY RIGHTS This Agreement shall not create any rights or benefits to parties other than Client and ARA. No third pa rty shall have the right to rely on ARA opinions rendered in connection with the Services without ARA written consent and the third party's agreement to be bound to the same conditions and limitations as Client. 16. COMPLETE AGREEMENT; MODIFICATIONS This Agreement constitutes the entire Agreement of the parties hereto, and all previous communications between the parties, whether written or oral with reference to the subject matter of this Agreement, are hereby canceled and superseded. No modification of this Agreement shall be binding upon the parties hereto, unless such is in writing and duly signed by the respective parties hereto. Item 1G - 59 8 ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL Your signature below indicates your acceptance of this proposal in accordance with the scope, price, schedule, and the terms and conditions contained herein, and will create a binding agreement between you and ARA. This acceptance will act as a notice to proceed. Acceptance and Authorization Name (print) Title Signature: Date: Item 1G - 60 ATTACHMENT D GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION – SUBCONSULTANT (MB PRO) PROPOSAL Item 1G - 61 December 17, 2021 Mr. Bryon Chavez, Aviation Engineer RS&H - Reynolds, Smith and Hills, Inc. 5901 w. Century Boulevard, Suite 1030 Los Angeles, California 90045 Subject: Proposal for Limited Geotechnical Study Palm Springs International Airport - Taxiways Asphalt Pavement Rehabilitation 3400 E Tahquitz Canyon Way Palm Springs, California 92262 (Proposal No. 21-0764) Dear Mr. Chavez: MP Professional Services, Inc. (MB Pro) is pleased to present this proposal to perform a limited subsurface exploration for the Taxiway W asphalt conditions located at the Palm Springs International Airport in the City of Palm Springs, California. The purpose of our study is to evaluate the pavement section and subsurface soil conditions within the areas experiencing pavement distress. The following sections describe our understanding of the project, our proposed scope of services and fee, and an estimated schedule for the completion of our study. Our proposal is based on the following: •Your request for proposal per email on December 6, 2021; •Project Exhibit, Figure 1, PMP Branch Map dated February 2020; •Palm Springs International Airport Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report, prepared by WSP dated March 31, 2021; and •Similar past projects performed by MB Pro. BACKGROUND AND PROJECT UNDERSTANDING MB Pro understands that RS&H, Inc. is planning to evaluate the pavement conditions within Taxiway W, and portions of associated cross-taxiways A, B, G, J, K, W, and ATERM 02A at the Palm Springs International Airport. The available PCI survey and analysis report indicates that the asphalt concrete pavements for Taxiway W and associated cross-taxiways were constructed between 1982 and 1995 and were rehabilitated over the years by approximately 2 to 5 inches of grinding and overlay. The report also tabulates sections of Taxiway W and cross-taxiways to illustrate the existing pavement distress based on Pavement Condition Ratings (PCR). Item 1G - 62 In order to evaluate the remaining pavement life and overlay thickness required, RS&H is utilizing the service of others to perform a non-destructive Heavy Weight Deflectometer survey. To complement the HWD survey, MB Pro was requested to perform subsurface field investigation and asphalt coring within the proposed taxiway sections under study. The following table is an excerpt from the Pavement Condition Index Report to demonstrate the current and projected PCIs and PCRs within each section. Each PCR with associated PCI is grouped into seven categories to indicate the pavement condition; Good (86-100); Satisfactory (71-85), Fair (56-70); Poor (41-55); Very Poor (26-40); Serious (11-25); Failed (0-10) Branch Section Current (2019) Future (2024) Future (2028) PCI PCR PCI PCR PCI PCR TA 05 45 Poor 43 Poor 41 Poor TA1 01 72 Satisfactory 66 Fair 65 Fair 02 55 Poor 52 Poor 50 Poor TB 09 61 Fair 59 Fair 57 Fair TG 02 56 Fair 54 Poor 52 Poor TJ 07 54 Poor 52 Poor 50 Poor TK 04 56 Fair 54 Poor 52 Poor TW 01 69 Fair 65 Fair 65 Fair 02 52 Poor 50 Poor 48 Poor 03 56 Fair 55 Poor 53 Poor TW1 03 65 Fair 65 Fair 64 Fair TW2 01 68 Fair 66 Fair 65 Fair ATERM 02A 50 Poor 47 Poor 46 Poor SCOPE OF SERVICES AND METHODOLOGY Based on our understanding of the project and the review of the previous study, MB Pro proposes the following tasks to evaluate the pavement conditions and to provide recommendations for rehabilitation and/or reconstruction of the asphalt pavement within the proposed taxiways. Task 1 – Background Review & Geophysical Survey We will review readily available geologic maps and existing studies covering the site. We will mark the locations of our proposed boring/coring holes and notify Underground Service Alert of our intent to dig in accordance with State law. Based on your request, MB Pro proposed to subcontract with CBelow to clear the utilities within the boring and coring location areas using Ground Penetration Radar and other geophysical methods to reduce the potential for underground utility lines conflict. We request that all available information identifying the type and location of utility lines and other man-made objects beneath the proposed improvement areas be provided to us at least one week prior to marking our field exploration locations. Item 1G - 63 Furthermore, we request that a maintenance supervisor or someone familiar with the layout of utilities in the vicinity of the proposed borings meet with us to review the locations. A reasonable effort will be made during the marking of the boring locations to avoid utility line conflicts. However, our scope of work does not include time for the repair and/or replacement of utility lines that may be accidentally broken and/or damaged by our drilling activities that are not the result of our negligence. MB Pro will not be responsible for the repair of utilities damaged by our field activities if the utilities are unmarked or located differently than shown on the plans. Task 2 – Field Exploration MB Pro proposes to drill 20 to 22 borings within the taxiways and cross-taxiways to a maximum depth of about 10 feet, or refusal, whichever occurs first. We plan to drill the borings using truck-mounted hollow-stem drilling equipment. Our typical soil sampling intervals will be at approximately 2 to 3 feet to maximum depths explored. The number of blows necessary to drive a Standard Penetration Test (SPT) sampler and/or a modified-California sampler will be recorded. Bulk soil samples and modified California ring samples will be collected from the borings for further engineering analysis and testing. The depth to groundwater will be measured at the completion of drilling, if encountered. Asphalt and aggregate base thicknesses of each bore hole will be measured and recorded. During the field investigation, MB Pro will use traffic cones, signages, and other control signs to protect the work area and for the safety of the public. We also understand RS&H will retain the service of Dynatest to perform HWD testing for further assessment of the existing pavement conditions. Per HWD consultant request, MB Pro proposes to the core in designated areas to aid in establishing correlation for the GPR testing and deflectometer. We assumed the required core numbers may vary between 10 and 12 core holes. Utility Locating Service Based on our teleconferencing on December 15, 2021, RS&H requested MB Pro to obtain the services of a sub-consultant to locate existing utility lines within the proposed boring and coring areas. MB Pro proposes to provide these services using CBelow as its subcontractor. Geophysical methods will be used to detect the presence of utilities. The fee for this service is provided as separate line items in our fee proposal. This service and fee can be deleted if there are no known underground utilities in the areas of the proposed borings and corings. Task 3 - Laboratory Testing Laboratory tests will be performed on selected soil samples to evaluate the physical and engineering characteristics of the subsurface soils. The laboratory tests to be performed may include the following: •Moisture content and unit weight; •Maximum Dry Density & Optimum Moisture; Item 1G - 64 •#200 sieve wash or gradation for soil classification; and •California Bearing Ratio (CBR). The selected type and frequency of laboratory testing will depend on the nature of t he soils encountered, and the density and cohesion of the soils as determined by the blow counts recorded during sampling. Task 4 – Report Preparation (Deliverables) The results of our field exploration, laboratory tests, and engineering analysis, will be summarized in a written report prepared under the supervision of a Registered Geotechnical Engineer. We can provide an electronic copy (pdf file) of a draft report f or review and comments. Upon receipt of any review comments, we will review the comment s and incorporate them into our final report where applicable. One pdf copy and two hard-bound copies of the geotechnical report will be provided for your use. At this time, we anticipate that our report will include the following items: •Site Plan showing the approximate boring & coring locations; •Site Vicinity Map & Geology Map; •Logs of borings including existing asphalt concrete and subbase thickness; •Results of laboratory tests; •Discussion of general site surface and subsurface conditions; •Discussion of pavement conditions; •Discussion of HWD testing results and findings; •Recommendations for site preparation, earthwork, fill and compaction requirements; •Recommendations for temporary excavations; and •Recommendations for reconstruction or rehabilitation of flexible pavement based on MB Pro field investigation and HWD testing. ASSUMPTIONS The scope of work described above, and the associated fee assumes the following: •Permission to access the site will be provided and the site is accessible with truck- mounted drilling equipment; •If available, utility plans for the taxiways will be provided to MB Pro prior to subsurface exploration; •Cost estimate does not include delays in the field, other than delays caused by MB Pro, including “right-of-entry” for MB Pro, and its subcontractors in order to complete the work proposed herein; •Based on RS&H request, MB Pro assumes that the field works will be performed during night shifts from Monday through Friday, between 7:00 pm and 4:00 pm; Item 1G - 65 •The utility locating services will be provided concurrently with the field investigation; •The fee proposal assumes participation in 2 online project meetings; •Engineering consultation is provided up to 4 hours to respond to review agencies or additional work that may be requested by reviewers. SCHEDULE Depending on weather conditions and subcontractor availability and permission to access the site during night-shifts, MB Pro is prepared to begin the fieldwork about two to three weeks following written approval to proceed, thus allowing time to coordinate with Palm Springs Airport Authorities to obtain access for field crews, site escort and site clearance by Underground Service Alert and CBelow. The fieldwork is anticipated to take about three to four night-shifts to complete. Our report should be completed within about five weeks following the completion of the fieldwork and readiness of the non-destructive survey report by HWD consultant. The work schedule can be compressed if needed to meet specific deadlines. GEOTECHNICAL STUDY FEE MB Pro proposes to provide the services described above for a fixed fee of $46,712. Our fee estimate can be roughly broken down as shown on the budget attachment. LIMITATIONS Our work will be performed in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by other members of MB Pro’s profession practicing in the same locality, under similar conditions, and at the date the services are provided. This proposal may be used only by the client and only for the purposes stated, within a reasonable time from its issuance. CLOSURE Our work will be performed in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by other members of MB Pro’s profession practicing in the same locality, under similar conditions and at the date the services are provided. Our scope of work does not include environmental assessment or environmental sampling. In accordance with the law and industry standards, MB Pro will notify Underground Service Alert (811 DigAlert) and have public utilities marked prior to digging. MB Pro will take reasonable precautions to avoid damage to these marked services (utilities). MB Pro cannot be liable for unidentified (hidden) underground utilities. MB Pro does not assume or accept responsibility for damage done to underground utilities while performing their services. Underground utilities include but are not limited to: natural gas or propane lines, sprinkler lines, electrical power, sewage, communication, oil, water, and storm drains. Damage and/or repair will be at the owner’s expense. Item 1G - 66 We understand C Below has been successful in locating many utilities not identified by DigAlert, you could call 1-888-90-BELOW for further information. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Regards, MB Professional Services, Inc. Michael J. Molina Vice President of Client Services 951-552.0031 MichaelM@MBPro.com Item 1G - 67 Qty Unit Rate Amount 24.0 Hourly 510.00$ 12,240.00$ 1.0 Each 595.00$ 595.00$ 3.0 Night 225.00$ 675.00$ 3.0 Night 150.00$ 450.00$ 6.0 Each 125.00$ 750.00$ 24.0 Hourly 213.00$ 5,112.00$ 8.0 Hourly 115.00$ 920.00$ 2.0 Hourly 95.00$ 190.00$ Subtotal:20,932.00$ 1.0 Hourly 160.00$ 160.00$ 30.0 Hourly 142.50$ 4,275.00$ 1.5 Hourly 180.00$ 270.00$ Subtotal:4,705.00$ 50 Unit 30.00$ 1,500.00$ 60 Unit 20.00$ 1,200.00$ 80 Unit 30.00$ 2,400.00$ 10 Unit 85.00$ 850.00$ 6 Unit 250.00$ 1,500.00$ 3 Unit 575.00$ 1,725.00$ Subtotal:9,175.00$ 6.0 Hourly 180.00$ 1,080.00$ 10.0 Hourly 160.00$ 1,600.00$ 12.0 Hourly 120.00$ 1,440.00$ Subtotal:4,120.00$ 6.0 Hourly 180.00$ 1,080.00$ 10.0 Hourly 160.00$ 1,600.00$ 24.0 Hourly 120.00$ 2,880.00$ 2.0 Hourly 150.00$ 300.00$ 12.0 Hourly 75.00$ 900.00$ 4.0 Hourly 75.00$ 300.00$ Subtotal:7,060.00$ 2.0 Hourly 180.00$ 360.00$ 2.0 Hourly 180.00$ 360.00$ Subtotal:720.00$ 46,712.00$ Total: Report Preparation Moisture Content & Dry (Bulk) Density Sieve Analysis Materials in Soils Finer than No. 200 sieve by Washing Moisture Content of Soils and Aggregates by Oven Drying Principal Project Engineer Maximum Dry Density & Optimum Moisture Staff Engineer Locating Utility Lines Single Technician Mobilization - (Cbelow) California Bearing Ratio (CBR) Laboratory Testing Engineering Analysis Principal Project Engineer Admin/Clerical or Support Staff Staff Engineer Project Manager Drafting Meetings & Geotechnical Consulting Principal (2 Meetings) Principal (consultation) Subsurface Investigation Budget Breakdown Palm Springs International Airport Project Engineer Field Staff Geologist, including marking borings, logging, sampling & patching - Night Shift Principal Engineer QA/QC Taxiway Pavement Study MB Pro Proposal No. 21-0764 Description Hollow Stem Auger Borings - Equipment & Operator (24 Borings) - Night Shift Field Exploration Field Services - Boring Layout, Utility Clearance, & Field Personnel Mob and Demob - Truck Mounted Hollow Stem Auger Per Diem - Drilling Subcontractor (Crew of 2) Concrete patching (7,000 psi), traffic control and consumables Locating Utility Lines Technician - (CBelow) - Night Shift Locating Utility Lines Admin & Project Coordination - (Cbelow) Per Diem - Staff Geologist Item 1G - 68 21-0764 MB Professional Service. • Ontario, CA • (909) 988-2795 • www.mbpro.com page 8 Charges For Service and Contract Terms Prevailing Wage Projects The charges for services and General Terms and Conditions set forth below will govern the provision of services and will constitute the contract terms between the Owner or Owner’s Representative (Client) and MB Professional Service (MB Pro) unless the Client and MB Pro have executed a written contract with respect to such services, in which case the terms and provisions of the written contract shall control. 1.Anticipated Costs 1.1. MB Pro estimates a budget to assist the client with code required inspections and testing based upon information provided by the client. MB Pro’s ability to perform within the estimated budget depends heavily on the accuracy of the information provided, as well as the cooperation and assertiveness of client’s management staff. 1.2. Project actual budget totals may vary. Estimated budget hours are based on 40 hours a week, 8 hours a day, Monday-Friday. Client shall monitor the percentage of work remaining to assure inspections and testing is not greater than the estimated budget and adjusts the contractor’s labor and scheduling to maintain the work completion schedule. 1.3. A call scheduling inspection and testing beyond MB Pro’s estimated budget is deemed acceptance that Client will pay for additional services beyond MB Pro’s estimated budget. 1.4. Client recognizes and agrees that any “anticipated costs,” “budget estimates,” or the like that may be prepared by MB Pro are NOT “guaranteed maximums,” “lump sums;” or “not-to-exceed totals”. Client will be invoiced for all work performed and only for work performed based on MB Pro’s working conditions and hours as an attachment to their contract. 1.5. Client recognizes, if shop steel fabrication service is required, MB Pro’s estimate of hours, unless otherwise noted, is for one steel fabrica- tion facility only. 1.6. Additionally, any weekly overtime hours, Saturday or Sunday, double shift, and/or night shift differential for shop steel inspection are NOT included in MB Pro’s proposal. 2.Minimum Charges 2.1. 2-hour minimum: Inspector shows up; no work requested or performed. 2.2. 4-hour minimum: 1 to 4 hours. 2.3. 8-hour minimum: Work over 4 hours. 2.4. If an inspector or technician works through lunch, one-half (0.5) hour of double time will be charged. 2.5. NOTE: Less than 24 hour call-out notice may necessitate premium charges. 3.Working Hours 3.1. Regular Time: First 8 hours, Monday-Friday 3.2. Time and One-Half Hours: Hours over 8 -12 Monday-Friday, and first 12 Hours on Saturday; Double Time: All hours worked after 12, Monday-Saturday, Sunday, and Holidays. 3.3. MB Pro observes the following holidays: New Year’s Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Veterans Day, Thanksgiving Day, Day after Thanksgiving, and Christmas Day. 3.4. Overtime hours shall be billed in one hour increments. One half (.5) hour of overtime is billed as one (1) hour of overtime. 3.5. NOTE: Day shift hours are between 5:00am and 5:00pm. 4.Shift Differential 4.1. Second (Swing Shift)-Eight (8) hours will be charged for 7.5 hours worked. Time worked in excess of 7.5 hours will be billed at time and one-half rate. 4.2. Third (Graveyard Shift)-Eight (8) hours will be charged for 7 hours worked. Time worked in excess of 7 hours will be billed at time and one-half times the hourly rate. 5.Travel Time and Mileage 5.1. Travel time costs for soil monitoring and soil technicians will be invoiced at regular contracted billing rate. 5.2. Mileage costs for soil monitoring and soil technicians will be invoiced at $0.75 per mile. 5.3. Portal-to-Portal travel time and mileage costs will apply for Engineers, Site Supervisors, and Consultants at the contracted billing rate, mileage will be invoiced at $0.75 per mile. Portal-to-Portal is recognized as MB Pro’s office to work site and return. 5.4. EXCLUDED - Projects within a 50 mile radius: Travel time costs for material inspectors/technicians will be invoiced at regular contracted billing rate. 5.5. For projects within a 100 mile radius: mileage costs for material inspectors/technicians will be invoiced at $0.75 per mile after the first 50 miles. For projects in excess of 100 miles from a MB Pro office, travel time and milage will be charged in addition to hours worked from MB Pro’s closest office. 6.Scheduling and Cancellations 6.1. A 24-hour notice is required when scheduling an inspection or technician. If same day scheduling or scheduling after 2:00pm the preceding day is requested, a premium expedite fee of $75 per inspector or technician will apply. 6.2. If inspection service is not canceled with MB Pro’s dispatch department by 2:00pm for the next day for ICC, LA City or LA County jurisdic- tions, a premium cancellation fee will apply at the rate of $75 per inspector or technician. Item 1G - 69 21-0764 MB Professional Service. • Ontario, CA • (909) 988-2795 • www.mbpro.com page 9 7.Expedite Fee 7.1. All expedited and rush requests for lab work, test results, report reviews, etc. will be charged an expedite fee at 1.5 times the Master Fee Schedule of Rates. 8.Escalation Clause 8.1. The prices quoted below for all services will change July 1st each year in accordance with the wage listed by the Director of Industrial Relations which is tied to Operating Engineers Local 12. The charges for services set forth in this Schedule of Fees will be adjusted by changes in our general administrative and overhead expenses each year thereafter. These adjusted charges shall become the agreed upon basis for charges by MB Pro to the Client. 9.Certified Payroll 9.1. Certified payroll requests will have a processing fee applied for each project, billed at $75 per payroll week. 10.Laboratory Testing 10.1. EXCLUDED - Inspection unit rates do not include material sample laboratory testing & sample pick-up charges. A material sample pick-up charge will apply of $7 per sample and 2-hour minimum pick-up charge at the rate of $50 per hour. 10.2. EXCLUDED - A soils sample pick-up charge will be invoiced at regular billing rate with a 2-hour minimum. 10.3. Unless otherwise agreed, all samples or test specimens will be disposed of or destroyed upon completion of testing. If Client requires samples to be retrieved or stored, arrangements can be made at an additional cost. Quotation will be provided for such services. 10.4. Samples requiring more than one person to handle due to oversize or weight, will incur an extra handling charge. Quotation will be provided for such services. 11.Reimbursable Expenses 11.1. Outside Services performed by others and direct costs incurred on the Client’s behalf, will be charged at cost plus 15%. 11.2. Project exclusive equipment or material will be invoiced at cost plus 15%. 11.3. Business licenses or inspection jurisdiction fees for project specific requirements will be invoiced at cost plus 15%. 11.4. If free parking is not available, parking charges will be charged to the Client at cost plus 15%. 11.5. Incidentals, including airfare, car rental, food, lodging, and parking, will be charged at cost plus 15% for out of area inspections unless provided by Client. 12.Terms of Payment 12.1. Client agrees invoices rendered for professional or technical services will be prepared bi-weekly and are due upon presentation. 12.2. All invoice errors or necessary corrections shall be submitted to MB Pro within Fifteen (15) days of receipt of invoice; thereafter customer acknowledges invoice is correct and valid for payment due to MB Pro. 12.3. Invoices will be deemed delinquent if not paid within thirty (30) days from date of invoice, and will be subject to a late payment charge of 1.5% of the invoice total for each month unpaid. 12.4. In the event, an attorney is needed for collection, Client is responsible for reimbursing attorney’s fees and or court costs. 12.5. MB Pro reserves the right to terminate services to a client without notice if client’s account is past due more than thirty (30) days. Upon such termination of services, the entire amount accrued for all services performed shall immediately become due and payable to MB Pro. Client waives any and all claims against MB Pro, its subsidiaries, affiliates, servants, and agents in connection with termination of work/services pursuant to this agreement. 13.Insurance 13.1. MB Pro carries all insurance required by law. Additional costs for waiver of subrogation, extra insurance certificates, coinsurance endorse- ments or additional insurance will be invoiced to the client at $150 each. 14.Final Reports 14.1. When final report is required, MB Pro must first review all inspection and material testing reports; MB Pro will address and clear up any unresolved issues on these reports, typically with the Architect or Engineer of Record. 14.2. Depending on the project complexity and length of MB Pro services performed, this process can require a minimum of ten (10) business days for completion. If there are exceptions, the final report review can require an extended length of time to complete. 14.3. Report fee is as negotiated per contract. An additional charge will incur for every report processed per permit number associated with the project. Engineer will be billed at $130 per hour. 14.4. Client is required to send MB Pro written request for all final project reports via fax, email, or US mail. 14.5. Final reports are as stated, but not limited to: Final Material Compliance Report and Final Grading / Compaction Report. 14.6. MB Pro will release final report to client once account, including cost of final report, is paid in full. 15.Service Authorization 15.1. Verbal request will be considered authorization to perform billable work. Client shall designate member(s) of staff who have authority to request services and notify MB Pro in writing to their authorized representative. Otherwise all service requests are billable 16.Proposal Valid Duration 16.1. Proposed Master Fee Schedule of Rates, Terms & Conditions and General Conditions stated within are valid for 30 days from proposal date. Item 1G - 70 21-0764 MB Professional Service. • Ontario, CA • (909) 988-2795 • www.mbpro.com page 10 General Conditions 1. Indemnification In the event of any claim against MB Pro by any party other than Client, Client agrees to hold MB Pro, including its shareholders, officers, directors, employees, agents, and representatives, free and harmless of any from, and to indemnify and defend MB Pro against, any and all liability, claims, causes of action, demands, judgments, losses, damages, expenses, or cost (including, but not limited to, all costs and fees of litigation) of every kind, nature and description, including but not limited to, any and all demands arising by reason of injury or death to person or damage to property, real or personal, including loss of use thereof, economic loss or loss damages otherwise arising directly or indirectly out of the obligations herein undertaken, or out of operations conducted by client, however caused or alleged to have been caused, even if due to acts, errors, omissions or negligence, active, affirmative or passive of MB Pro, except for such losses or damages arising out of or caused by the sole negligence or willful misconduct of MB Pro. 2. Limitation of Liability Client and MB Pro agree to limit the liability, including but not limited to, for consequential damages, of MB Pro, including its shareholders, officers, directors, employees, agents and representatives for any acts, errors, omissions, breaches of contract, or negligence, active, affirmative, passive, concurrent or sole, on the part of MB Pro, arising directly or indirectly from the performance of the professional services under this agreement, to Client to $10,000 or an amount equal to MB Pro’s fee, whichever is greater. Client agrees and understands that, in order to provide the professional services requested at the agreed upon fees, this agreement does not provide full liability of MB Pro losses or damages which may arise directly or indirectly under this agreement. Client further understands that should Client require MB Pro to accept exposure to greater liability under this agreement, Client has the opportunity to negotiate in advance a higher limitation of liability, or to eliminate entirely such limit of liability, but that the higher fees commensurate with this higher risk of liability to MB Pro shall be subject to agreement. Client agrees that this provision limiting MB Pro’s liability cannot be modified, altered, or varied except by written instrument signed by Client and MB Pro. Client understands and agrees that MB Pro is not an insurer; that this agreement does not provide Client with insurance coverage by MB Pro or anyone acting on its behalf; that all fees hereunder are based solely on the value of the professional services to be provided by MB Pro; that insurance, if any, shall be obtained by Client at Client’s sole expense 3. Warranty of Authority to Sign The person signing this contract warrants that he/she has the authority to sign on behalf of the client for whose benefit Consultant’s services are rendered. If such person does not have such authority, he/she is personally liable for all breaches of this contract and that, in any action against him/ her of such warranty, a reasonable attorney’s fee shall be included in judgment rendered. 4. Dominant Terms The terms and conditions of this Agreement shall take precedents over any terms and conditions which may appear in Client’s purchase order, approval or acceptance. Any terms and conditions of Client’s purchase order, approval or acceptance which are not identical to the terms and conditions of this Agreement are null and void, are not part of the agreement between MB Pro and Client and are not binding upon MB Pro. The terms and conditions of this agreement may not be varied or changed, nor any of its provisions waived, except by written agreement, signed by an authorized representative of MB Pro. If Client’s terms are different, a statement of worth will be provided with updated terms and conditions. Item 1G - 71 21-0764 MB Professional Service. • Ontario, CA • (909) 988-2795 • www.mbpro.com page 11 The Master Fee Schedule of Rates, Terms & Conditions and General Conditions set forth will be governed by State of California laws, provision of services and will constitute as contract agreement between Client and MB Pro unless the Client and MB Pro have executed a written contract with respect to such services, in which case the written contract shall control. Client’s Signature MB Pro Representative Signature Title Title Date Date Corporate Office 1236 W. Brooks Street Ontario, CA 91762 (909) 467-0104 Phone (909) 606-6555 Fax www.mbpro.com MB PRO Vice President of Client Services 12/17/2021 Item 1G - 72