HomeMy WebLinkAbout1K OCRCITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DATE: October 22, 2020 CONSENT CALENDAR
SUBJECT: ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING APPLICATION(S) FOR
PROPOSITION 68 PER CAPITA GRANT FUNDS.
FROM: David H. Ready, City Manager
BY: Cynthia Alvarado, Director of Parks & Recreation
SUMMARY
On July 7, 2020, the California Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) announced
$185,000,000 available for the Proposition 68 Per Capita Grant Program. This non-
competitive grant program provides funding to local government agencies to support the
rehabilitation, creation and improvement of local parks and to address deficiencies in
neighborhoods lacking access to outdoor recreation facilities. The City of Palm Springs
is scheduled to receive an allocation of $177,952 provided it applies for eligible projects.
This item will consider two projects for submittal through the Proposition 68 Per Capita
Program and authorize the submittal of grant application(s).
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Approve the two following projects for the Proposition 68 Per Capita Grant: James
0. Jessie Desert Highland Unity Center Ball Park Project, and Swim Center Shade
Structures;
2. Adopt Resolution NO._ "A RESOLUTION OF THE_ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ALL APPLICATION(S) FOR
PROPOSITION 68 PER CAPITA GRANT FUNDS;" and
3. Authorize the City Manager to execute all documents.
BACKGROUND
Proposition 68 Per Capita Grant Program
In 2018, the State of California invested in the largest grant funding for critically
underserved communities with the passage of Proposition 68: California Drought,
rrEMNO. j,K
2City Council Staff Report October 22, 2020 -Page 2 Adopt Resolution Approving Application(s) for Prop 68 Per Capita Grant Funds Water, Parks, Climate, Coastal Protection, and Outdoor Access for All Act. Recognizing the need for underserved communities to have equitable access to outdoor recreation facilities, the bond also provides funds for new parks that will help attract new and diverse visitors. The Proposition 68 Per Capita Grant program was released on July 7, 2020. The General Per Capita Program funds are available for local park rehabilitation, creation, and improvement grants to local governments on a per capita basis and the City will receive an appropriation of $177,952. The per capita grant will pay 100% of all eligible costs provided the project is located in an area identified as a disadvantaged community, otherwise the grant requires a 20% match of local funds. STAFF ANALYSIS: At the September 29, 2020, Parks and Recreation Commission meeting, staff reviewed the grant requirements and eligible projects with the Commission to obtain their recommendation for proceeding with the Proposition 68 Per Capital Program Application. A detailed list of projects is included in the Parks and Recreation Commission staff report included as Attachment 2. The Commission considered the following list of projects identified by staff: James 0. Jessie Desert Highland Unity Center Ball Park Project Laser Leveling Baseball Field $50,000 Install Bleachers & Shade Structures $25,000 Total $75,000 Leisure Center Floor Replacement Replace Leisure Center Wood Flooring Total Swim Center Shade Structures Installation of Bleachers and Shade Structures Total Project Victoria Park Restrooms Construct Public Restrooms Total Project $75,000 $75,000 $100,000 $100,000 $250,000 $250,000 The Commission did recommend to the City Council to proceed with the James 0. Jessie Desert Highland Unity Center Ball Field Improvements, and Swim Center Shade Structures projects, as both projects serve disadvantaged communities and do not require the 20% local match.
3City Council Staff Report October 22, 2020 -Page 3 Adopt Resolution Approving Application(s) for Prop 68 Per Capita Grant Funds ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: Section 21084 of the California Public Resources Code requires Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"). The Guidelines are required to include a list of classes of projects which have been determined not to have a significant effect on the environment and which are exempt from the provisions of CEQA. In response to that mandate, the Secretary for Resources identified classes of projects that do not have a significant effect on the environment, and are declared to be categorically exempt from the requirement for the preparation of environmental documents. In accordance with Section 15301 "Existing Facilities," Class 1 projects consist of the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing public structures, facilities, mechanical equipment or topographical features involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of the lead agency's determination. Therefore, in accordance with Section 15301 (c), staff determined that construction of the proposed improvements to the City's existing James 0. Jessie Desert Highland Unity Center and Swim Center are considered categorically exempt from CEQA, and a Notice of Exemption will be filed prior to commencing construction. FISCAL IMPACT: The Proposition 68 Per Capita Grant may award project(s) for a total amount not to exceed $177,952 to the City of Palm Springs. Award of these funds will assist the City in addressing deferred park infrastructure issues at park locations that qualify. SUBMITTED: /~/ ~ ----./ Marcus Fuller, PE, PLS, MPA partment of Parks and Recreation Assistant City Manager/City Engineer David H. Ready, Esq., P City Manager Attachments: 1. Resolution No: 2. September 29, 2020, Parks and Recreation Staff Report
4ATTACHMENT 1
5RESOLUTION NO. __ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING APPLICATION(S) FOR PROPOSITION 68 PER CAPITA GRANT FUNDS. WHEREAS, the State Department of Parks and Recreation has been delegated the responsibility by the Legislature of the State of California for the administration of the Per Capita Grant Program, setting up necessary procedures governing application(s); and WHEREAS, said procedures established by the State Department of Parks and Recreation require the grantee's Governing Body to certify by resolution the approval of project application(s) before submission of said applications to the State; and. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS HEREBY DETERMINES, RESOLVES AND APPROVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Approves the filing of project application(s) for Per Capita program grant project(s). SECTION 2. Certifies that the City of Palm Springs has or will have available, prior to commencement of project work utilizing Per Capita funding, sufficient funds to complete the project(s). SECTION 3. Certifies that if the project is awarded, the City of Palm Springs has or will have sufficient funds to operate and maintain the project( s). SECTION 4. Certifies that all projects proposed will be consistent with the park and recreation element of the City of Palm Springs' general or recreation plan (PRC §80063(a)). SECTION 5. Certifies that these funds will be used to supplement, not supplant, local revenues in existence as of June 5, 2018 (PRC §80062(d)); and SECTION 6. Certifies that it will comply with the provisions of § 1771.5 of the State Labor Code. SECTION 7. (PRC §80001 (b)(8)(A-G)) To the extent practicable, as identified in the "Presidential Memorandum--Promoting Diversity and Inclusion in Our National Parks, National Forests, and Other Public Lands and Waters," dated January 12, 2017, the City of Palm Springs will consider a range of actions that include, but are not limited to, the following: (A) Conducting active outreach to diverse populations, particularly minority, low income, and disabled populations and tribal communities, to increase awareness within those communities and the public generally
6Resolution No. Page2 about specific programs and opportunities. (B) Mentoring new environmental, outdoor recreation, and conservation leaders to increase diverse representation across these areas. (C) Creating new partnerships with state, local, tribal, private, and nonprofit organizations to expand access for diverse populations. (D) Identifying and implementing improvements to existing programs to increase visitation and access by diverse populations, particularly minority, low-income, and disabled populations and tribal communities. (E) Expanding the use of multilingual and culturally appropriate materials in public communications and educational strategies, including through social media strategies, as appropriate, that target diverse populations. (F) Developing or expanding coordinated efforts to promote youth engagement and empowerment, including fostering new partnerships with diversity-serving and youth-serving organizations, urban areas, and programs. (G) Identifying possible staff liaisons to diverse populations. SECTION 8. Agrees that to the extent practicable, the project(s) will provide workforce education and training, contractor and job opportunities for disadvantaged communities (PRC §80001 (b)(5)). SECTION 9. Certifies that the City of Palm Springs shall not reduce the amount of funding otherwise available to be spent on parks or other projects eligible for funds under this division in its jurisdiction. A one-time allocation of other funding that has been expended for parks or other projects, but which is not available on an ongoing basis, shall not be considered when calculating a recipient's annual expenditures. (PRC §80062(d)). SECTION 10. Certifies that the City of Palm Springs has reviewed, understands, and agrees to the General Provisions contained in the contract shown in the Procedural Guide. SECTION 11. Delegates the authority to the City Manager, or designee, to conduct all negotiations, sign and submit all documents, including, but not limited to applications, agreements, amendments, and payment requests, which may be necessary for the completion of the Grant Scope(s). SECTION 12. Agrees to comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, ordinances, rules, regulations and guidelines.
7Resolution No. Page3 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY THE PALM SPRINGS CITY COUNCIL THIS 22No DAY OF OCTOBER, 2020. ATTEST: Anthony J. Mejia, MMC City Clerk David H. Ready, City Manager CERTIFICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss. CITY OF PALM SPRINGS) I, ANTHONY J. MEJIA, City Clerk of the City of Palm Springs, hereby certify that Resolution No. __ is a full, true and correct copy, and was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Palm Springs on October 22, 2020, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Anthony J. Mejia, MMC City Clerk
8ATTACHMENT 2
9Parks and Recreation Commission Staff Report DATE: September 29, 2020 SUBJECT: DISCUSSION OF PROPOSITION 68 PER CAPITA GRANT OPPORTUNITIES FOR THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT. FROM: David H. Ready, City Manager BY: Cynthia Alvarado, Director of Pa.rks & Recreation SUMMARY On July 7, 2020, the California Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) announced nearly $198,875,000 million available for more than 700 agencies under the Proposition 68 Per Capita Grant Program. This is a non-competitive grant program provides funding to local government agencies to support the rehabilitation, creation and improvement of local parks and to address deficiencies in neighborhoods lacking access to outdoor recreation facilities. RECOMMENDATION: 1. Select a project from the list in this staff report and make recommendation to City Council. 2. Approve the application submittal for per capita grant funds. BACKGROUND Proposition 68 Per Capita Grant Program This program originates from Proposition 68, placed on the ballot via Senate Bill 5 (Deleon, Chapter 852, statues of 2017). On June 5, 2018 California voters approved the proposition. Funds for the program were appropriated via State Budget item 3790-101-6088 (b). Proposition 68 Per Capita Grant program was officially released on July 7, 2020.
10Parks & Recreation Commission Staff Report September 29, 2020 -Page 2 Discussion of Proposition 68 Per Capita Grant Opportunities STAFF ANALYSIS: Proposition 68 Per Capita Grant consists of two types of per capita programs that can be applied for: General Per Capita Program, and Urban County Per Capita. 1) The General Per Capita Program funds are available for local park rehabilitation, creation, and improvement grants to local governments on a per capita basis. There are $185,000,000 dollars available. Grant recipients are encouraged to utilize awards to rehabilitate existing infrastructure and to address deficiencies in neighborhoods lacking access to the outdoors (PRC §80061 (a)). 2) The Urban County Per Capita are additional funds available for Per Capita grants to cities and districts in urbanized counties (a county with a population of 500,000 or more) providing park and recreation services within jurisdiction of 200,000 or less in population. There are 13,875,000 dollars available. An entity eligible to receive funds under this subdivision shall also be eligible to receive funds available under the General Per Capita Program. Sixty percent (60%) of the General Per Capita funds will be allocated to the following entities based on population. • Cities • Eligible districts, other than a regional park district, regional park and open-space Forty percent (40%) of the General Per Capita funds are allocated to the following entities based on population. • Counties • Regional park districts, regional park and open space districts, and regional open space districts Eligible Projects: • Projects must be for recreational purposes, either acquisition or development. Do not submit combined acquisition and development projects. • Up to 5% of the allocation may be completed under one contract; each project requires a separate application packet. • A project can only have one location. One project that serves several park s is not permitted. • Grantees are encouraged to partner with other grantees on projects (PRC §80063(b)). Projects not serving a "severely disadvantaged community" (median household income less than 60% of the statewide average) require a 20% match.
11Parks & Recreation Commission Staff Report September 29, 2020 -Page 3 Discussion of Proposition 68 Per Capita Grant Opportunities Per Capita grant funds can be used to supplement existing expenditures, rather than replace them. Budgeted capital expenditures cannot be reduced with Per Capita funds to make up the difference. Similarly, if a project has been approved by the governing body, and a funding sources has been identified, Per Capita funds cannot be swapped in as new funding sources unless the prior funding source is applied to another recreational capital project. Grant Performance Period: July 1, 2018 -June 30, 2024 1) Office of Grants and Local Services (OGALS) Mandatory Grant Administration Workshops: Web based workshops will be held statewide and all recipients are required to attend. 2) Resolution: City (Grantee) passes one resolution approving the filing of a// applications associated with the contract, and provides a copy to OGALS. 3) Application Packet(s): The Grantee defines the project scope(s) and amount of grant funds needed for each project. As projects are identified, the grantee submits individual application packet(s) to OGALS, per project site and/or project type. OGALS reviews each application packet and sends a letter of approval to the grantee or requests additional information. (Application packets are due no later than December 31 2020) 4) Contract: OGALS Approved Application Packet(s) will receive a contract from OGALS which must be signed by the Grantees authorized representative and returned to OGALS. A fully executed contract will be provided by OGALS to the Grantee. 5) Payments and End of Grant Performance Period: The following apply when requesting a Grant Reimbursement. • Complete California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) • Approval of a sample timesheet for in-house employee services • Bid Summary documents for Construction costs • Deed restriction • Preconstruction costs are limited to 25% of total project cost. • Photo of required construction sign installed on project site • Construction progress photos. 6) Accounting and Audit: The California Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) Audits Office may conduct an audit. The Grantee is required to retain all project records for five years following issuance of the final grant payment or project termination, whichever is later. This is a non-competitive grant program providing funding to local government agencies to support the rehabilitation, creation and improvement of local parks and to address deficiencies in neighborhoods lacking access to outdoor recreation facilities.
12Parks & Recreation Commission Staff Report September 29, 2020-Page 4 Discussion of Proposition 68 Per Capita Grant Opportunities Application Packet Checklist: • SWl'I of Calttomihl .. Tho Hat1.1ral RBOurt:ils Apncy DEPARTMENT OF PAR«S AND RECREATIOH Application Packet Checklist GRANTEES rnust complete the checkUst beiow and submit it W~1h the APPLICATION PACKET. An APPUCA TION PACKET Is not comp1ete un·less al I Items on the check I ist are submitted. Each PROJECT requires its own APPLICATION PACKET. Application Item • Application Digital file name,; ap~icatron.ptlf • : D Devejopmenl Project Scope/Cost · · Estimate, or : ........... ~!'~-~name;~:~ •• • Acqursitlon Requirements Digital file name,, ac~.il)df & acqdoc:1.pdf Funding Sources Form Digital file n.ame: funding:sourees.pdf __ p_ _ _ ··---_ .: ::~,~:~~ ~c~~~rCalcuJator 0 : D CEQA Compliance Certificatton ... ·-•. t -· .. ,_o~ ~-~ame: g:qapdf . _ ... _ _ _ Land Tenure documentation D : D Digilal file name5-: ownership,.pd1 IJll' nonawnership.pdf •:• --· ---· -•:• ·• ··---···J I •! SUb-Leases or Agreements Digibll fde -: clheragreeme.nts..pdf Site Plan Oigil.!1 file name: sl!ef'l'an .pdl --·----·--- -----GHG Emissions Reduction Worksheet (at completion} Digital Ii~ name: emmians.-pdr Photos Digital Iii!! mime: protas.pdf -Procedural Guido Page# Check when signed by AU1HORIZEO Application Packet Page# I REPRESENTATJVE Pg. 12 Pg. 19 Pg. 14 Pg.20 ~1 Pg. 13 1 ·-1' i Pg.21 Pg.21 Pg.24 i Pg.24 Pg.24 Pg.24 Pg. __ • Pg._ • Pg._ ·• • . --·1····· ................. -.............. .. Pg. __ Pg. __ = .,._., ..... ~ ,.,.,_.w._-__ ,,__......._._, • • j ::-.... -.. -: -·r ·--! Pg. __ ., I i p J ~~== Pg. __ ~1 1 ! Pg. __ l .......... ..J.. .... ' ..... , .......... .. i Pg. __
13Parks & Recreation Commission Staff Report September 29, 2020 -Page 5 Discussion of Proposition 68 Per Capita Grant Opportunities Proposition 68 requires projects that do not serve severely disadvantaged communities (median household income less than 60% of the statewide average) to include 20% match. Costs incurred to provide match must be eligible costs, State funds are not allowed towards the projects match funding. Eligible match sources are: • Federal Funds • Local Funds • Private Funds • In-House Employee Services • Volunteer Labor The state uses its "FactFinder" web-based software determine whether there is a critical lack of park space within proximity (a half-mile radius) of the project site. The lower the ratio of park space per 1,000 residents, the higher the score. The FactFinder is available online at: https://www.parksforcalifornia.org/communities Proposition 68 Per Capita Grant Funded projects must be for capital outlay; that is, acquisition of land, or improvements to existing property beyond its original condition. Operation, maintenance, and repairs are not eligible. Development project applications must be consistent with the Parks and Recreation elements of the agencies adopted general or recreation plan. City Park Data: Staff utilized the FactFinder tool to determine how well each City Park would score relative to the significant poverty criterion.
14Parks & Recreation Commission Staff Report September 29, 2020-Page 6 Discussion of Proposition 68 Per Capita Grant Opportunities Palm Springs Dog Park: Grant match IS required California State Parks PrQjeci ID: 12&05 Cootdlrt.Mes.. 33.8303, ·11 S.5468 Per Capita Match Calculator oa1e:00121/'Z020 PROJECT AREA STATISTICS County: Median HOU$.8hold li'ICal'ne: Agent;yTYJ)(t: 1he mtdlan ~ lnootne In h c;trde ._ ~ «1Uillllff .. Sevwttty Dtudvantll;ed. Mlllffl tS ... red. PaikorPAJ~Alea &'I Ol~anraged Comrnu:sitv Im ~Y Dtaa~ Cqmmunlt/ No Data REPORT BACKGROUND Th$ projeet $Wl$lic$ "4ve be$'I cab.11.ated baied on h.all mile radius around lhe poir4 location &elected. Only parlt acres within ttw pn)je(t aJM'$ half mite radius are rworted Papulatiol'I and people in ~ are calculated by detennlning the l,'lertem of 81'Y 081'11il1$ bbek-groupg Nt ln(enle(:t wilt1 the proj:,ect area The s:im;ect area is then a.s&igned the aum of all the census biOckiJl"QUI) portions.. An tQual dislribution in ¢en.9Ull b!Odt1JfOl,lp& is assum«t. Rural area& are calculated at a census blQCk leYel to improve resub. Mei,ian ho\1$$h<llr;i and pe,-captta incxnne-are cak::1.11~ ~ a weiQhted aYeflQe of the C$'l$U$ bfodl-group vatu• that fall within !he f)rQje¢t arM-PROJECT AREA MAP Mor& information on the calculations ia avallat:te on...lbe. fllt>thqds page ,. OemoQraplllc5-Amerlcan Community Survey (ACS} 5-year estimates 201-4-2011t. Decennial 2010 cet'l$u$; the 11\$,gi, of error (MOE) was not~ Parb---Catifomla Pl'Otected ~Q$ DatabaSIJ' 202oa CFF adjusted {6l2020) -more informaliOn at hrjp· -'lw.wt CAL ands on;. ParM al"ld park acres area ba$«1 on be$l available soun::e inlOtmetiQn bot may not atwaY$ contain exact bOundarie& or an pa,1Q; in speciric rocations. Pa.rks are defined further in lhe 2015 SCORP (pg. 4). IJael$ C$n 5$flr.f upjated morma!lon on~ t,;, SCORP@oarl-is.ca.goY
15Parks & Recreation Commission Staff Report September 29, 2020 -Page 7 Discussion of Proposition 68 Per Capita Grant Opportunities Frances Stevens Park: Grantmatch IS required California State Parks Projact 10: 12004 COOfdlrrates: 33.8306, -116.5461 Per Capita Match Calculator Date. OOJ2u2020 PROJECT A.REA ST'ATISTICS PROJECT AREA MAP c.ounty: RIWffllide Medan Houaehold Income: $73,994 Agst'lq'Type: Other Agency The medJan housllhDld Income In 1h11 clrde does not quality m Sevenlty ~ llm:h IS required. P.,:ko,P~Area fl DBadllantaged Commuri,y II Sewrelv ~ C.Ommunit)' NoDat.a REPORT BACKGROUND The-~ slellstk:6 he;ve beel1 c;:abJlar,,ed based on hall mile radlua around the point k;ication ~ Onty ~ acres wiltiin Iha project area's half mite radius are reported. PoputaliOn and people In poverty a,a calc1llaled tiy d91ermining lhe percent of any census. bko"iJfOUPS 1hat lnter$$cl with the project~ The project s,ea is 1tlen assigned 1he sum of all the census block-group portions. An 8CJS1 ~n in census block-groups is assumed. Rural ~ 811J c;:afcut;Jtecl at a 08111$U$ blod( ~ ti;> improve re&ull$. Mtdan housem:lld and per capita income are calculated as a weighted average of the census bl<,ck-group W'alues that fall within the project atea. More information on the calcula11ons Is available on.Jb.li mettlodspage ... Dl!lr'l,iqQrapbfc8---Amerit:an Commurllty SuN8Y (ACS) 5-yeer estlmales 2014-2018; DecennlsJ 2010 Cen&u$; the margin of emJr {MOE) was not analyzed. Pmtcs--Caltfomia Protected Areas ca~ 2020a CFF adjUS1ed {6/2020}-mare information at trttp·ttttn CAI ams org Parks and parl( aaes area based on beis-t a\l8ifable soun::e Information but may nal always calllSin exact boundaries or al perks in specific localions. PEUkS are defined ful1her in the 2015 SCORP (pg. 4). Lf$ef$ can $end u~ itm;nmalion on pami to SCORP@parka.ca..goy
16Parks & Recreation Commission Staff Report September 29, 2020 -Page 8 Discussion of Proposition 68 Per Capita Grant Opportunities Gateway Park: Grant match IS required California State Parks Project lD: 12800 Cooo:iirr.atias: 33.8447, -116-5059 Per Capita Match Calculator Daia:ow2,,ro20 PROJECT AREA STATISTICS County: Metlan Household lrx:ome: Ri'l$J$ide $81,027 ()therAr,et1Q'J AgencyType: Pa,ti. Qt Prese,ved /vea Ill Di~Cootmtnty Severely ~ Community No Data REPORT BACKGROUND The ptojecl siatlsties have beea'I cabJlaled based on hall mil• radius around hi point location~ ()ntype,it aaas wilhln lhe projec;t area's half mile radius are 19POl1ed. Pol,t,ilalion and people In p<Mlrty are calcufatf;ld by detern'lining thEI pen:ent of any census bk>dl~roup& that intersect with the project area. The project a,ea Is 1hen assigned the sum or all the cenal.1$ bfock~ po,t1ons An equal ~n In ~i bloc:k~~ IG; ~ Al,lral areas are calculat8d al a census block kMII lo improve Ri!Sull&. Macian household and per capilB incoriie era calculmed as a weighted aWlt'age of th& census blodl.· group \la1ues tha1 fall within tbe project anie. PROJECT AREA MAP More information on 1he cak:ulaJions i$ avai1atxe on.lba methods page • DiiiMOgrapb~ Communiry Sur.o!W {ACS} 5-year estimatee 2014-2018; Decennial 2010 ~; the margin of em:ir (MOE) 11188 not analyzed. Parb-Caltlomia Protecled ArNSi Oa.lBbase 2020a CFF adjiu~ {'6/2020) • ITIQre infQrmstion ,\It IJIU>·ftt,ww CAlandfi Q[Q Parks and park actes 8196 based on be$t a~ sQUn;:e information bt,11: may net always .contain exact boundaries er all perk$ in spl!Clfic !Qcations. Pa.dis are defined further In the 2015 SCORP (pg. 4). Users can send updeted infarmation on pad.a lo SCORP@patks..ca.goy ·•.
17Parks & Recreation Commission Staff Report September 29, 2020-Page 9 Discussion of Proposition 68 Per Capita Grant Opportunities Wellness Park: Grant match is NOT required California State Parks Proj(tct IO: 1~ Coooilnates: 33.8365, -116.5405 Per Capita Match Calculator Dam: 09/21/2<}20 PROJECT AREA STATISTICS C(icmty: IAldan HQl.lfiAillhott Income: R~ $68,874 Other A99ncy Agency Type: The prvfecl wves a.98¥8f'88y d~ community. llaldl Is NOT required.. Paik er Presen,ed Alea II~ Ccmmtnty ii SNtrely Dadvanlaged Community Noc.ta REPORT BACKGROUND The project Slatisb have been calculated based on halt mil$ rad~ an;iund the pc;Jint location~ 0nty pm1l ~ within the pn;,jl;ldl ,area'$ half mile radius a.re ll;!pc;Jl't~. PQpufalion a,l(j p;10p" in pov$~ are c:aleulaJed by determining the percent of any census ~-groups that kller$ed with the proJect area. The project ares is then uslgnecf ~ wm Qf all 111$ ~n$1,1S bh)C:kiP'Q~ portions. An equal distribution in census blOCk-gro.upa iS assumed. Rural areas are caicu!ated SI a census bloek level t.o improve .... Median household and par capita rnoome are csbJlaled " a weighted a...erage of the census blOdl.-group vmues that fall within the project a,ea. 'Fl-~~:,;];.g •ts<_<:;~_,:-i,. .; <.::·..::"'" .~~it..,..;." r ;:t' PROJECT AREA MAP Demogtaphlel--Arnerican Community Survey {ACS} 5-year 8'3tlma188 2014-2018; Decennial 2010 Censi.is; 1hfJ ma,vin Qf f;M'l1JI' {MOE) was not .,-,atyzed. Pat1tl-Calltomia Protected Areas Database 2020a CFF adj;Usted {6/20201 ~ more information at http-flwww GAi ands ~ Parks~ pat1' acres a!V(l based on -1 •vdi,ble e.oun::e lnfarm,.tion but may not ~Y• con1ain 9llSd boundaries or all perks. in specific locations. P~ are d$finfild ~ in tt1'l 201S SCORP (pg. 4). Users can send updeied fnfDrmation on pstks to SCORP@parks.ca.gov
18Parks & Recreation Commission Staff Report September 29, 2020 -Page 10 Discussion of Proposition 68 Per Capita Grant Opportunities Ruth Hardy Park: Grant match is NOT required California State Parks PrQje(;t 10: 12am Coofdinatss: -33.6349, -116.5390 Per Capita Match Calculator Data: 09/21/2020 PROJECT AAEA STATISTICS PROJECT AREA MAP County: Fl~ Median H~hOi:t Income: Agency Type: $73,337 i)i, Other Agency ·•'. ·,, The~ serwas a.98NNly cl~ community. • Match t• NOT 11t1qulrad. ,;,~, Park ot Preserved An.!1a • ~ Coourun1y ti SeYerely ~ Community No Oeta REPORT BACKGROUND The project statistics have been calculated based on half mile radi1,15 around the p;1fnt kx:ation ~ Only park 8Cl1J!$ within the pmi~ a111a's half mile raowa are ll,!p0r1ed. PQpu~ and PilOjJle In~ an;t C$k:ufat$d by determining the pef'0el1t of any censusc block-groups !hat Intersect with the praifd area. The pro;ac:t a.nae i$ then .slgnec;f the SI.Im of all 1t1l;I c;en$\JS bhx:k-group pQniQf\$. An equal diStribution in 0Elf1SU6 bl0Ck-gr'Ol4)6 iS essu:tned.. Rural areas are C8b.dated at a census black leYt:H to improve ~•-Median household and per capita fooOme are csbJlated as a weighted awrage Of the oenaus bkd.-group vmues that fall Mthin the project area rnethods page ., Damogrephlca-Amerir;:an Community SuN9y (ACS} 5-year •llmel9$ 2014-2018; Decemial 2010 Cen$l.16; thfJ margin of error {MOE) WU not anatyz~ Parb-Calllomia Protected Areas Database 2020a CFF adjusted {6/2020} · mote lnk>rrnatlcn at http·ltfflttw CAI sods~ Park$ and P11lf'k ~ a~ •ed on bes.ta~ SQUl'Ce informa.ttc;m but may rlQt .i,nys contain exact boundaries« al pe,ks in speoific locations. Plllk$ are ~ned ~r In 1he 2015 $CORP (pg. 4}. users can send updated information an parks to SCORP@pa,1<5.cs.gov
19Parks & Recreation Commission Staff Report September 29, 2020 -Page 11 Discussion· of Proposition 68 Per Capita Grant Opportunities Victoria Park: Grant match is NOT required California State Parks Project; ID: 12000 Cootdinates: 33.8530, -116.539-0 Per Capita Match Calculator Data= os,r2112020 PROJECT AREA STATISTICS County: MEden HOUE,\3hOld Income: Agency Type: R~ $56,122 Other Ag,ancy The p,atact .-v,ea a Nvendy dlSlldvanblQed community~ llatch la NOT required. PROJECT AREA MAP Park o, Pre&e!\led Area II Disadvantaged Ccmmooily B Severely Disadvan!aged Community ,-)t. •. , No Data REPORT BACKGROUND The llf'C)ject SWlstics have been calc:ul$d based on halt mil~ radius around the pofnt: location ~ Only park acres within the projed area's half mile ndU$ e,1t rapQrtt,d. Popufal;on $nd people in ~rty-. <$1(::1,1~ by dllterminlng the pe('(;l8nt of any cemus t,b:jl-gn:,,upe that lnlet$ed wilti the project area. The prOject area is then 41$$lgnecl tile _,m of all the census block-group pcr1i00$. An ~ di.$tributi0n In census bkx:k-groupe is usumed. Rural area& are c.ek:u1alsd al a (::er15US block lewl to improve reeults. Median househOld and per capita income are calculeled a:& a weighted avetage of the oonaus blOdt-group vatues that fell wit;hin the projEK:;t mea,. Dem0graphlc&--Amerlcan Community SurYeY (ACS} 5-year estimates 2014-2018; Decennial 201 0 Cen$.1$; ht fNUlJin of em:ir (MOE) was not analyzed.. Pmb-Callfomia Pratecled Araas Daiabsse 2020a CFF adjusted {6/2020} -more informallon at http·//www CAL.ends~ PeriG and park lj;ICl8S 81" based Qn best aYailable $OUl'CfJ information bu1 may· noi· ~)'a contain 8Xad boundaries or all perks in specific fotatiolis. Paik$ are dlimned further in the 2015 SCORP (pg .. 4). IJ$8ltS can send' updated information on parks 1D SCORP@pari<s.es.,mw
20Parks & Recreation Commission Staff Report September 29, 2020 -Page 12 Discussion of Proposition 68 Per Capita Grant Opportunities Baristo Park: Grant match is NOT required California State Parks ProJect 10: 12700 Coo1din.a:tes: 33.8185, -116.5427 Per Capita Match Calculator ome:ow21,2020 PROJECT AREA STA TISTlCS CQ\B'lty: Median Houwhold Income: R~ $50,446 Other Agency Agency Type: The pn:,fec1 W¥89 aNverety cltsad¥anlaged eommunlly. llaldl '-NOT required. Patk or Presen<ed Ive&. 11 Di~ Ccrnmuni!y m $werety Disadvantaged Community No 0ata REPORT BACKGROUND The project SU!tisb have tJe£m calculalsd baaed-on halt mile nldius around the point IQcation selected. Only pa,k 8cre6 within lh8 pn;,jed ·are,a's half mile radius are reported. PQl)t.lfld.c>n $1td l)aOllfe In pave~ ate (:a.1(:1,,1~ by determining the percent Of any census bloct.-groups that 1n1ersect witti the pn::ijecl area. The p~ Bf88 is then 8$$lgned the $Um of all ttte Q1;1n$1,11i1 blixx-gn;iup ponions. An equal diSIJ'ibulj()n In census bk:lck-gmupa is assuma1. Rural 8l9aS are eelcu1ated al a census bloek level tc improve resutts. Median hOuSehOld and per c:epita income are <:alculatad as a weighted average of 1he oenaus bled\.-group YWH that fall within the PfOjecl aiea. PROJECT AREA MAP OemOQtaphle&-Arneriean community Su1'¥8y {ACS} 5-y$8! eeilmel8$ 2014-2018; Decemial 201 o CE!n$US; ttle ~ of error {MOE) -.a not ,analyzed. Parb-Calllotma Protected Areas Database 2020e CFF adJustsd {&'2020) • mote information at b11p/!www CALag mg P,lm$ and pa,k aaes area *ed on best a~ sourw inff;JrmatiQn m,rt rmiy not always oonlSin exact boundariea or all patkS in specific locations. P8Ni! era defint;!d nstftier in ttte 2015 SCORP (pg. 4}. Users can send updeted information on paflls tti SCORP@pmjq.ca.gov
21Parks & Recreation Commission Staff Report September 29, 2020 -Page 13 Discussion of Proposition 68 Per Capita Grant Opportunities Demuth Park: Grant match IS required California State Parks Project m: 12198 Coordirnrtes: 33.0083, -116.5043 Per Capita Match Calculator Dale= OM!112020 PROJECT AREA STATISTICS PROJECT AREA MAP Cotmty: R~ MEden HOU$8hQid lncQme: Agency Type: $43,884 2:;_fo·::'.~~:-:~ '" Other A99ncy "f '7,..: . ':. ~ }ti ~;;" s· ~+: The meclian hOUSlhoid Income In Iha c:lrcta does not quallfy ':i 1::: :,·, :t • Seveawty Dladvmlaged. Maten 19 requlled. • ';_ ' REPORT BACKGROUND The projacl statistic$ have been cak:ulaled based on halt mile radius around tflll;! pofnt ~~Only park acres within the projedl area'$ half mile radiue; are RIPQrwci. PQJ)ufation end people In pave~ ate C$1Culaled by detennining the percent of any census blodil-groups that inlanied with the Pltl.fect area. The project a,ea is then Q!iiiigned the S1;1m of all the oensu1;11;Jlock1Pt11.1P portiQn$. An ecpJSl distribution In census block-groups is assumed. Rural areas are celculated at a cansus bloek leYet to improve resub. Mecfian household and per captta inoOme are caleulaled as a we{ghted average of !he oena!JIS bl<>dl.-group vatue& that fall wit,hln the pn;ijeci a,ea. (i i!ICOI¥' Q!fmlurifJ FacFlldlf It a..,,;ud 1tt. ~~-!If P._.-.:1 "'9ef~ -JIii-~ . :: ,· . ~-· .~ . ' Damognaphle&-Amerlcan Community Surwy {ACS} S-)'$Sf ~timeles 2014-2018; Decennial 2010 Census; the ffl$rgin Qf em;,r (MOE) wa$i not analyzed. Parll:a-Callfomia Protected Areas Database 2020a CFF adfuSted (&2020), • meta infOrmatkm at trttp·/ttffiw CALands ~ Parks and patk ecres area ba$ed on .be$f $.~ source lnformatiQn but may no1 always contain exact boundaries or all parks in specific focations. P~ are defined further In the 2015 SCORP (pg. 4}. lJ$8ra can send updated information on pmb to SCORP@patks.ee gov
22Parks & Recreation Commission Staff Report September 29, 2020 -Page 14 Discussion of Proposition 68 Per Capita Grant Opportunities Palm Springs Swim Center: Grant match is NOT required California State Parks Pro.ie«ID: 121s7 Coordinates: 33.8164, -116.5242 Per Capita Match Calculator Dale: 09/21i2020 PROJECT AREA ST A TISTICS County: Mecian HOU$eh<Md Income: Agency Type: R~ $48,~; Other A'19ncy PROJECT AREA MAP The prafacl..,,.. • Nveretr dlsadvanlacled cammu~. .~ ,., llaldl Is NOT 19qulred. Pa«k or P~ Area " fl ~ Ccmnum=ty ~:·: r, ~,.,, , ,_,,,~, tt _ ... J · m Severely OiSadvanJBged C.Ommunity -· · i No Cata ,,. REPORT BACKGROUND The prOject slatislics have been caJculaled based on half mile radius around 1h1l;I point location~ Onty park acres within ihe projecl area's half mile racflU$ are reported Popuf.h>n $nd ~le In poveey are c:alc;l,llated by determining the percent of any census bkxtl-groupa that lmet'&act with the projeCt area The project area is then as$1Wi)ned the 6Um Qt all the «.(iMSIJS blQdt.group portions. An e(pJai dtitribuoon in census block-groups is assumed. Rural araas arv cak:ulllted 81 a census bloek lewel tD improve meult&. Meman househOld and per capita fnoOme are calculaled as a weighted aygrage of the cen.aus bled(-group vabJe6 that fall within 1tH;I project 1;Uea. Mare ~non the (:Sla.ilafii:)ns is av~ ol\Jbs. methods page • DamCQnaphl4;&-Amentan Community Surva,,. (ACS) 5-year eellmales 2014-2018; Decennial 201 0 Can$\$; tfla margin Qt error (MOE) was not analyzed. Parb--Olllfomia Protected Areas Database 2020a CFF adjusted {6/2020} • more information at bttp·/Jwww CALsnds Pfl1 Parks !lJld par1\ acres QB. b.,sed Qn be!;t aVlililabre sQUrce information bt,Jt mlilY not always contain exact boundaries or all parks in specific locations. Paik$ are c;jefined furthEtr in~ 2015 $CORP (pg. 4}.. Users can send upds!ed information on parks to SCOflP@parks.ca.,gov
23Parks & Recreation Commission Staff Report September 29, 2020 -Page 15 Discussion of Proposition 68 Per Capita Grant Opportunities Sunrise Park/Leisure Center: Grant match is NOT required California State Parks Proktet 10: 12100 Coordinates: 33.8170, -116.5252 Per Capita Match Calculator oam: OS/2112020 PROJECT AREA STATISTICS O;)&.mty: MEdan Hou~old Income: A~ $47,443 Other Agency Agency Type: The Pftltecl 98MIS a .INN8rllify dlsadunlaoad community. llatdl Ja HOT required. Park or Presenoed Alea II o~ Community m Swerety OisadV'an1&ged C.Ommunit)t No Oata REPORT BACKGROUND The fl(Ojed statltitica have been cab.llahid based on hall mile ,wjiw an;>und ttNil Point location~ Only parl( 8i:.nffl within tie project 8rN'5 half mile radius a,re ~ported. P(,puhdon an(I people In f>CM;llly EU"1 ~v~ by detennining the percent of any census block13roups that lntetMct 'M1:h the praiect area_ The project a.tea iS then Si$lgned the eum of all tf1lil oeniws block1PQUP partiQnS. An equal diStribution In census blOck-gr'OUp6 is assumed. Rural areas are caltu1atsd SI a 0B11&uS bloek level t.o improve ~•-Median household and per capi1a inoOme are calculated as a weighted average of 1he oansus blodl.-group vaJues that fall within the project a,aa. PROJ:ECT AREA MAP Daniographtc&-American Community Survey· {ACS} 5-yeer eetlmalaS 2014-2018; Decennial 201 o Ceneit.1$; ttie ~ of ~ {MOE) was not analyzed. Partte-Callforma Proted8d Areas Daiabese 2020a CFF adjusted (6/2020) -more Information at http/twww CAL ands Pill Pi!1rk$ and p$lk ~s a,ea bae4 on be$t a~ $0Urt:EI lnfQrma1i:c;m ~ may not always contain exact boundaries o, aJI par1<S, in specific locations. Patks are defined further In the 2015 SCORP (pg. 4}. Users can send upde!ed information on parks to SCORP@pw.ca . .gov
24Parks & Recreation Commission Staff Report September 29, 2020 -Page 16 Discussion of Proposition 68 Per Capita Grant Opportunities Desert Highland Park: Grant match is NOT required California State Parks ProJaQt m: 12795 Coordinat.es: 33.8676, -116.5522 Per Capita Match Calculator Oala:w21t2020 PROJECT AREA STATISTICS Ccwnty: ~ Hou•hold Income: R~ $45,337 Olher Agency Agency Type: The pn:itecl 1181'¥81 a.18W118fy di~ communlry. March ta NOT lllllqulred. Paik er Presenied A.tea 111 0t~Ccmmunity I! Severely ~ Communit)' No Data REPORT BACKGROUND The project slatistics have beef! calculated based on haH mile ,a,dit.11$ around the P'Jm:t location selected. Only pa,i,. acres wiltlin the projed area's half mile racfrus are reported. PQpUfatton "peopk(, in ~-~ub:$d by detenninil'lg ttie pElt"C8frt otf any cetasuS blodi.1)roupa that lntarsect with the prqect area. The pn)jeCt area is 1fl&n 8$$igned' the $I.Im of all the censue block-group portions. An equal distribuoon In oensus block-greupa is assumed. Rural amas ant cefculsled 81 a census block tewl to impn:we resl.dt$. Median housetrck:f and per capita lna:lrt'te are cabllalsd as a weighted average of 1he oansa.m. block-group vEiJues thel tall Mthin ttl1;t project area PRQJ:ECT AREA MAP methods page ., 1Jia«Jogn11phles-American Community $ul'\l8)' (ACS) 5-yesr estimaiea 2014-2018; Decennial 2010 Cen$1.1S; the ~ of error (MOE) was not analyz¢ Pattr.a-<:allfonria Protected Areas Database 2020a CFF ad'iusted {6/2020) • more information at httirtt«w:w CAL soos Q PaJ1(s; ~ pas1( a.aes ~rea bas«t Qn be$t avail~ soun:e infQrm,mQn bl,Jt mey· not always contain exact boundaries or aB parks in specific locations. Paits are defined ~r In ~ 2015 SCORP (pg. 4}. Users can send updated information cm patks to SCORP@parl<s.ca.go~
25City Council Staff Report September 29, 2020 -Page 17 Discussion of Proposition 68 Per Capita Grant Opportunities Per Capita Projects: • James 0. Jessie Desert Highland Unity Center Ball Park Project: Laser Leveling Baseball Field $50,000 String/scribe and define new infield edges. Excavate existing materials 3", load and remove materials. Laser level the sub grade, and add 150 ton of Corona Clay Angels Mix to finish grade providing an uninformed profile throughout the infield. Install bleachers & shade structures $25,000 Purchase and install two stadium bleachers and steel frame shade structures for the JOJ Desert Highland Unity Center Ball Park. Total Project Cost: $75,000 • Leisure Center Floor Replacement: Replace Leisure Center wood flooring $75,000 Removal and replacement of existing wood flooring in dance/gym room at the Leisure Center. Total Project Cost: $75,000 • Swim Center Swim Structures: Installation of Bleachers and Shade Structures $100,000 Installation of three portable bleachers and cantilever shade structures, providing shaded seating areas. · Total Project Cost: • Victoria Park Restrooms: New Public Restrooms Design and construction of two stall public restrooms at Victoria Park. Total Project Costs: $100,000 $250,000 $250,000* 1 *Note: Victoria Park Restrooms Project requires additional funding, beyond that City's allocation of Proposition 68 Per Capital Grant funds.
26City Council Staff Report September 29, 2020 -Page 18 Discussion of Proposition 68 Per Capita Grant Opportunities FISCAL IMPACT: The Proposition 68 Per Capita Grant may award project(s) for a total amount not to exceed $177,952. Award of these funds will assist the City in addressing deferred park infrastructure issues at selected park location(s). SUBMITTED: Cynthia Alvarado Director, Department of Parks and Recreation