HomeMy WebLinkAboutA3122 - FAA DECISION APPR AIIRPORT PASSENGER FACIL0
rd-
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
November 8, 1993
City Clerk
Francesca Toscano, CDBG Specialist via
John J. Tuite, Director of Economic Development
INCOMPLETE INSURANCE
RECEIVED
0&1:C 1 u 1%"4
The following agreements required insurance, but certificates were not provided following
execution of the documents. The work under the agreement has been completed, as noted,
and the Risk Manager does not require further followup:
Agreement No. Provider
3271 ✓
Food In Need of Distribution
31 15"
P.S. Youth Center
3119.
Riverside County Office of Education
3128-�'
P.S. Senior Center
3129 -
P.S. Boys & Girls Club
3130
Community Counseling/Consultation
Center
3131
P.S. Senior Center
3132
P.S. Youth Center
3133 -
Alternatives to Domestic Violence
3144--
Shelter from the Storm
3145 —
Volunteer Ctr. of Greater Riverside
3147 i
F.I.N.D.
3153-
College of the Desert
3154�-
Riverside Co. Housing Authority
(Nightengale Manor)
3155 -
Harvest of Wellness Foundation
3158-
Riverside Country Housing
Authority (Fair Housing)
3171 -
Desert Transition House
3025-
The Boys and Girls Club
3026-
Desert Aids
302i}-
Coachella Valley Housing Coalition
Date Completed
10/93
6/9 2
1.0/92
9/92
9/93
10192
4/93
11 /93
6/93
11 /9 3
6/93
6/93
6/93
6/9 3
6/93
6/93
6/93
9/93
6/9 2
11 /92
cvti
City Clerk
November 8, 1993
Page 2.
Agreement No. Provider
3029, AIternatives to Domestic Violence
3036, Riverside Co. Housing Authority
(Nightengale Manor)
3041,,- Riverside Co. Housing Authority
(Pair Housing)
r,
Q
L ANCESCA TOSCANO JOIYMITE,
CDBG Specialist Dire or 4f Econ
APPROVED: AZ(1�11
Risk Manager
Date Completed
6/92
6/92
6/92
Development
I � 1 :4 � (0) �#,Jkrl � I Wi � I
From the desk of: Allen F. Smoot, A.A.E., Assistant City Manager -Special Projects
DATE: October 16, 2001
TO: Trisha Sanders, City Clerk
SUBJECT: PASSENGER FACILITY CHARGE (PFC) APPROVAL ($4.50)
Trisha, attached please find the original letter approval from the FAA which officially raises our PFC
to $4.50 as of January 1, 2002. All necessary notices have been sent to the air carriers.
Thanks.
ALLEN F. SMOOT, AAE
Assistant City Manager -Special Projects
AFS:ps
ATTACHMENT - PFC Approval Letter; FAA
�aa�o
A
a
U.S Department
of Transportation
Federal Aviation
Administration
OCT -- 9 2001
Allen F. Smoot, AAE
Interim Director of Aviation
City of Palm Springs
P.O. Box 2743
Palm Springs, CA 92263-2743
Dear Mr. Smoot:
Western -Pacific Region P.O. Box 92007
Airports Division Los Angeles, CA
90009-2007
Ascay
By DEpT OF
AVlgOTN
(fi0O
In accordance with section 158.37(b)(1)(i) of the Federal Aviation
Regulations (14 CFR Part 158), the Federal Aviation Administration
(FAA) has reviewed and approved your request for amendment to the
approved application to impose and use passenger facility charge (PFC)
revenue at Palm Springs international Airport (PSP). For future
reference, this amendment will be identified as number 92-01-C-02-PSP.
Procedural History:
Date of written notice to air carriers: June 29, 2001
Date of consultation meeting with air carriers: July 30, 2001
Date of amendment application received by FAA: September 7, 2001
There were no certifications of disagreement as a result of the air
carrier coordination process for this amendment action.
This amendment action approves an increase in the collection level for
one project in this application from $3.00 to $4.50 per passenger
enplaned at PSP, with the earliest charge effective date for
collections at the $4.50 level being January 1, 2002. In addition,
this amendment represents a decrease to the total amount of PFC to be
collected for this project at the said $4.50 PFC level, as listed
below:
Project Previously Revised
Description Approved Approved
Airport Terminal $81,888,919 $76,883,179
Expansion
Based on the information provided by the City and our review of the
collection records, the new estimated charge expiration date will be
July 1, 2024.
In approving the increased PFC level, the FAA has determined that there
is no reasonable expectation of additional Airport Improvement Program
funding in the amount of PFC collection previously approved for this
project. Furthermore, the FAA has determined that the city of Palm
Springs has made adequate provisions for financing the airside needs at
PSP including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates.
The FAA reminds the City that it must comply with 9158.43(b)(3) which
states, in part, that the charge effective date (January 1, 2002) will
be at least 50 days from the date the public agency notifies the
carriers of approval to impose the PFC.
Please notify, in writing, each of the air carriers collecting PFC's at
PSP of the approval of this amendment noting the revisions to the PFC
Level, amount of PFC collection, charge effective date, and charge
expiration date resulting from this action.
If you have any questions regarding this amendment, please contact
Eric Vermeeren at (310) 725-3631.
Sincerely,
Herman C. Bliss
Manager, Airports Division
*`�
MORAMUM
From the desk oh Allen F. Smoot, A.A.E., Assistant City Manager -Special Projects
DATE: September 6, 2001
TO: Trisha Sanders, City Clerk
SUBJECT: PFC AMENDMENT #2 TRANSMITTAL
Attached, please find an original copy of Amendment #2 to the Airport's Passenger Facility Charge
Program. This has now been transmitted to the FAA for their review and we anticipate a January
1, 2002 implementation date. We will forward copies of FAA approval once we receive it.
Thanks.
ALLEN F. SMOOT, AAE
Assistant City Manager -Special Projects
AFS:ps
AGENDA
AIR CARRIER CONSULTATION MEETING
Palm Springs International Airport
July 30, 2001
I. INTRODUCTIONS
II. AMENDMENT #2 to PFC ($3.00 to $4.50)
*See Air Carrier Consultation Packet previously sent to all carriers.
III. OTHER
Palm Springs International Airport
6I28101
Projected Cash Flow and Airline Payment Requirements
2001
2002
2003
2004
Airport Operations
8,602,0999
9,250,158
9,740,975
10,263,313
Airport Debt Service
1,812,846
1,782,109
1,782,109
1,782,109
Airport Capital
1,262,683
1,038,500
738,000
700,000
Total Department Expense
11,677,527
12,070,767
12,261,084
12.745,422
Special Capital Improvement
0
10,000
100,000
100,000
Maintenance & Operations
188,000
166,000
120,000
100,000
Landside Development
1 01
10,0001
50,0001
50,000
Total Other Required Reserves
188,000
186,000
270,000
250,000
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
11,885,527
12,256,767
12,531,084
12,995,422
TOTAL NON AIRLINE REVENUE
7,257,203
8,032,754
8,159,029
8,290,600
SURPLUS I DEFICIT
(4,608,324)
(4,224,013)
(4,372,055)
(4,704,822)
PFC REVENUEIINTEREST
1,549,826
1,557,575
1,606.037
1,654,217
(2.92 @ 84% enplaned)
PFC REVENUEIINTEREST
0
1,920,297
2,431,056
2,503,987
4.42 84% enplaned)
PFC DEBT
868,214
868,214
894,037
894,037
NET PFC 2.92
681,612
689.361
712,000
760,180
NET PFC 4.42
1,052.083
1,537,019
1609950
AIRPORT RESERVES
308,266
PFC TRANSFER IN
1,222,266
250,000
92 BOND REFINANCE
500,000
AIRLINE REVENUE REQUIRED
2,396,180
2,784,652
3,660,055
3,944,642
(2.92 PFC)
AIRLINE REVENUE REQUIRED
NIA
2,421,930
2,835,036
3,094,872
4.42 PFC
ENPLANEMENTS
631,860
635,019
654,777
674,420
COST I ENPLANEMENT 2.92PFC
$3.79
$4.39
$5.59
$5.85
COST I ENPLANEMENT 4.42PFC
0
$3.81
$4.33
$4.59
Fiscal Year 2002 PFC of $3.60 represents a mid year implementation.
Note: The airline revenue required in 2001 was $2.4 million, with the $4.50 PFC as
demonstrated above the 2002 airline revenue required will remain at $2.4 million.
6
_T
T
r
31
m
0
N
0
is
NIr-
0 m
6
U
J
T
A
9
0 1"
V1
01
T
7
T
T
co
m
O
LL
n
4 MOOD
coo � cc � Q
a i
= � r N m
Z` r c
Q m
u► mgg E o
�m �Q mQu7c�m
m
1141,
.. m
e7 Q +
W�
Leplo asiowa uo poWdumo 3 a1
GA
8
uh
0
n
i
It
7
m
U
•N
m
E
:
•eopuag jdjw*M wngad Bulsn aoa nog[ iluvgL
m 8
m M R❑ ❑ S
C- ?,
� �cc $
pp ❑❑
L
'e 0�
a T
A
. m ` E
�IaQo
❑ ❑ ❑ t: ao
m
s�
0
Wl
s 2
g �r
Xg L*
LU
a�
�
w sfi
,
On m a
■ ■ ■
Q a��
� ro
C
k4Z
p
C6 n.
innA ei
NORTHWEST
A I R L I N E S.
Department Numbez
Al135
Northwest Airlines, Inc.
5101 Northwest Drive
5t. Paul MN 55111-3034
www.nwa.com
July 26, 2001
Mr. Allen F. Smoot, A.A.E.
Interim Director of Aviation
City of Palm Springs
P.O. Box 2743
Palm Springs, CA 92263
Dear Allen:
Pursuant to 14 CFR § 158.23 (c) (1), Northwest Airlines, Inc. acknowledges receipt of the notice to
amend a Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) provided by the Palm Springs International Airport in a
letter dated July 29, 2001 pursuant to 14 CFR § 158.23 (a). This acknowledgement is provided
pursuant to the PFC regulation and shall not constitute agreement with any proposed project. This
acknowledgment is also provided without prejudice to any position that Northwest Airlines, Inc.
may take in the future relative to the appropriateness of the proposed projects.
I will not be able to attend the meeting scheduled July 30, 2001 due to another commitment. Please
forward the project and meeting handouts to my attention at your earliest convenience.
Sincerely,
Dawn M. Hughes
Regional Director/Airport Affairs
612-726-3751 FAX: 612-727-6041
dawn.hughes@nwa.com
cc: Don Minnis/ATA
DMHllkd
RECEIVED
Jul a 0 2m,
BY; DEPT. OF AVIATIOP
KLM
-�llgy���lN�f
July 11, 2001
Certified Mail P 112 169 270
Mr. Allen F. Smoot, AAE
Palm Springs International Airport
3400 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way
Palm Springs, CA 92262
Dear Mr. Smoot -
This is formal acknowledgment that Alaska Airlines has received your notice dated June
29, 2001 as required by 14 CFR.158.23 stating your intent to increase Passenger
Facility Charges at Palm Springs International Airport.
Alaska will plan to attend the meeting scheduled for July 30, 2001 to discuss the use of
Passenger Facility Charges at Palm Springs International Airport.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
ALASKA rAIRLINES, INC.
U `� l
Clifford T. Argue
Staff Vice President
Properties and Facilities
cc Dennis Olson, Director Properties
VE,
JUL 19 29�1
BOX 6 8 9 0i' SFATTL E, WA 98 1 6 8. 0 9 0 0 ; 01 . 4 i 1- 1 2 00
sf
S4AWIA
!
July 9, 2001
Mr. Allen F. Smoot, AAE
Interim Director of Aviation
Palm Springs International Airport
3400 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way
Palm Springs, CA. 92262
RE: PFC Consultation Meeting
Dear Mr. Smoot:
�D
e JUL 1 a z
go
Y. GtN7.
Pursuant to 14 CFR Part 158 SkyWest Airlines hereby acknowledges receipt of the notice of intent,
dated June 29, 2001, to amend PFC4 91-01-C-00-PSP as previously amended. The meeting is
scheduled for July 30, 2001 at 11:00 a.m.
A representative from SkyWest Airlines will be in attendance.
in ,
Steven F. Dwiggins
Manager Airport Affairs
444 tioisdo River Road
St. George. Utah 84790
435.634.3000
Pax: 435.634.305
www.skywcsi.coin
w
w
H
E.
OF
C)
0
a
LL
40
1
y��
W
U
rn
to
Z
O
d
d
Q
2
a
7
�9
r
4-
.. -
�'
Z`
3
3
n
V
^
CI
Note to file: Same letter with
separ addresses mailed to each
person on attached list.
PALM
• tiro .n� a
��O�A14V
Cql! FpRN\�
July 30, 2001
City of Palm Springs
Mr. Mike Copelon
Sr. Manager Corporate Real Estate
AMERICA WEST
4000 E Sky Harbor Blvd.
Phoenix, AZ 85034
Office of the Assistant City Manager - Special Projects
3400 T:duluiti Canyon Way • Palm Shrinks, C.difrmua 92 Y}
TFL (764)1 318 39f1<1 • FAX (1601 ;18 1815 • TI)IT (740) Hr.1 -+5"
RE: Minutes of PFC Consultation Meeting
Dear Mr. Copelon:
The Palm Springs International Airport held its duly noticed Air Carrier Consultation meeting at
11:00 a.m. local on July 30, 2001. Attached, please find the Minutes of that meeting and a second
copy of the Consultation Packet.
The result of the proposed Amendment will be the avoidance of a rates and charges increase this year
of an estimated $900,000.
We seek to have the Amendment and increased collection effective January 1, 2002, and, therefor,
seek your assistance in processing your formal response to the Amendment as quickly as possible
as well as agreement with any expedited processing that the FAA will allow.
Sincerely,
ALLE F. SMOOT, AAE
Interim Director of Aviation
AFS:ps
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Minutes
2. Consultation Package
Post Office Box 2743 0 Palm Springs, California 92263-2743
PFC MAILING LIST
Consultation Meeting for July 30, 2001
Amendment #2
MR HERB FAHRENBRUCH
MESA AIRLINES/AMERICA WEST EXPRESS
4000 E SKY HARBOR BLVD
PHOENIX AZ 85034
MR DENNIS OLSON
DIRECTOR OF PROPERTIES
ALASKA AIRLINES
19300 INTERNATIONAL BLVD
SEATTLE WA 98168
MS JACKIE AGAN
PROPERTIES MANAGER
AMERICAN AIRLINES
4333 AMON CARTER BLVD MD 5317
FORT WORTH TX 76155
MR MIKE COPELON
SR MANAGER CORPORATE REAL ESTATE
AMERICA WEST
4000 E SKY HARBOR BLVD
PHOENIX AZ 85034
MR SAN CHANG
MANAGER CORPORATE REAL ESTATE
UNITED AIRLINES/UNITED EXPRESS
1200 E ALGONQUIN ROAD
TRABUCO CANYON CA 92679
STEVE DWIGGINS
SKYWEST AIRLINES
444 S RIVER ROAD
ST GEORGE UT 84770
]th�'T�EA�d9R �
NORTHWEST AIRLINES
5101 NORTHWEST DR DEPT A 1135
ST PAUL MN 55111
NIGEL SPACHMAN
REGIONAL MANAGER SOUTHWEST USA
CANADA 3000
AIRPORT CENTER III
9841 AIRPORT BLVD STE 103
LOS ANGELES CA 90045
JESS E HALL
WINGS WESTIAMERICAN EAGLE
4333 AMON CARTER BLVD MD
FORT WORTH TX 76155
JENNIFER KOVAS
MANAGER AIRPORT AFFAIRS
CONTINENTAL AIRLINES
1600 SMITH STREET
DEPT HQSPF
HOUSTON TX 77002
SUMMARY MINUTES
Air Carrier Consultation Meeting
July 30, 2001 - 11:00 a.m. Local
Palm Springs International Airport
The Airport held its duly noticed Air Carrier Consultation meeting concerning the raising of the
Airport's Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) from $3.00 to $4.50 to allow for full coverage of debt
service on previously approved PFC projects.
Attendees were as follows:
Dennis Olson, Alaska Airlines
via conference call
Steve Dwiggins, SkyWest Airlines
via conference call
Ralph Jackson, SkyWest Airlines
via conference call
The Airport reviewed the Air Carrier Consultation packet which was sent on June 29, 2001 to all air
carriers serving the Airport. Attached to these Minutes, please find a second copy of the Air Carrier
Consultation packet.
The carriers were advised that the sole purpose of the Amendment is to raise enough PFC dollars
to cover the existing debt on the previously approved PFC projects. The projections attached to the
consultation packet show that with the Amendment, the total PFC dollars collected will be reduced
as well as the total term of the PFC. These reductions are accomplished via early redemption
provisions in the bonds which will allow for any PFC collected in excess of a year's required debt
to go to retire additional debt early.
SkyWest Airlines inquired about the 80% collection ratio and the Airport reported that the
percentage reflects the current collection rate. Alaska Airlines inquired as to the $30,000 annual
administrative costs. The Airport reported that these costs were reflective of the Airport's staff time
and Finance Department staff time to administer the collection and reporting of the PFC.
There being no further questions, the carriers attending expressed support, including a quick written
letter of support to hopefully expedite the approval process.
G
AIR CARRIER CERTIFICATION
OF
AGREEMENTIDISAGREEMENT
SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE APPROVED PASSENGER FACILITY CHARGE
Palm Springs International Airport
August 30, 2001
Federal Regulation Part 158 outlines the thirty (30) day procedure whereby the airlines must
register their Certification of Agreement or Disagreement with the Airport's proposed amendment.
Airlines not submitting the certification shall be reported as being in agreement.
All airlines serving the airport were sent notices of the consultation meeting on July 29, 2001.
Even though all did not acknowledge receipt in writing or attend the consultation meeting, all were
sent two copies of the consultation package and a copy of the consultation meeting minutes. They
were given opportunities to comment.
One of the two airlines in attendance at the consultation meeting (via conference call) sent
in their Certification of Agreement without comment. The second airline did not send in a
Certification.
Based on the Certification of Agreement received and the non -receipt of any Certification
from the other air carriers serving the Airport, we hereby report 100% approval of the proposed
amendment.
ol
SkyM
AIR L 1 N E S
July 30, 2001
Mr. Allen F. Smoot, AAE
Interim Director of Aviation
Palm Springs International Airport
3400 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way
Palm Springs, CA 92262
RECEIVED
AUG 0 B 2001
BY: DEP I. Ur- HViATION
ef"'MA j crb
Subject: Certification of Agreement/Disagreement pursuant to Title 14, C.F.R. Section 158.23
(c) of SkyWest Airlines, Inc. with projects presented in Air Carrier Consultation
pursuant to Title 14, C.F.R. Section 158.25 (b) Palm Springs International Airport
Amendment #2 of PFC# 9 1 -01 -C-00-PSP to increase PFC from $3.00 to $4.50.
Dear Mr. Smoot:
SkyWest Airlines, Inc. has previously acknowledged the receipt of your notice to impose and use
Passenger Facility Charge # 91-01-C-00-PSP (PFC) Amendment #2 at Palm Springs International
Airport (PSP) and we have had the opportunity to attend the air carrier consultation meeting required
under Section 158.23 of the PFC regulation. We hereby submit our written Certification of Agreement
or Disagreement (as set forth in Attachment "A") with respect to each of the projects presented in your
notice dated June 29, 2001.
SkyWest will collect and pay a PFC for revenue enplaned passengers observing the first two - last two
qualifying enplanement cities. We will not collect or pay a PFC for non -revenue, frequent flyer award,
or industry free tickets. We trust you will find our response is consistent with the intent of the PFC
legislation.
Sincerely,
6�w
Ralph G. Jacks II
Properties Specialist
Attachment
cc: James K. Boyd, VP Customer Service
Lowell Johnson, Mgr., - Grants in Aid Division - FAA
FAA Western -Pacific Region
Thomas J. Browne - ATA
444 South River Road
St. George, tltalr 84790
435.634.3000
Fax: 435.634.3505
rvrwv.skywest.com
ATTACHMENT "A"
SKYWEST AIRLINES, INC.
Certification of Agreement or Disagreement
July 30, 2001
This Certification of Agreement or Disagreement is provided to the Palm Springs International
Airport as required under the provisions of 14 CFR, Part 158, Section 158.23.
SkyWest's agreement, if any, is contingent upon the estimates, scope and description of the project
as presented. Should any of these estimates materially change (with the exception of the fifteen
percent (15%) contingency allowed under 14 CFR 158), SkyWest automatically certifies
disagreement with the project pending review and reevaluation on the basis of the revised
information. In addition, any agreement under this PFC consultation process is not to be construed
as approval or disapproval of these or related projects or financing plans under any present or future
agreement with the Palm Springs International Airport. Any agreement under this PFC consultation
process shall not be construed as an invalidation of any present or future rights under any existing
or future use or lease agreements to review and/or approve or disapprove these projects and the
financing plan relating to these projects. SkyWest reserves the right, and hereby exercises such right,
to certify its agreement or disagreement with each discrete project comprising the Application as
follows:
AMENDMENT #2 PFC # 91-01-C-00-PSP
SkyWest Airlines certifies agreement with Amendment #2 as presented. The total project costs
are $82,314,639. AIP Funds $4,888,314. Local Funds $543,146. PFC Revenue $76,883,179.
Position: Agree
Comment: None
This concludes SkyWest Airlines Certification of Agreement/Disagreement with the projects
presented for an Impose and Use PFC at the Palm Springs International Airport, Palm Springs,
California.
RESOLUTION NO. 20160
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA,
AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITTAL OF
AMENDMENT#2 TO PASSENGER FACILITY
CHARGE (PFC) APPROVAL PFC 92-01-C-01
PSP, INCREASING THE CHARGE FROM
$3.00 TO $4.50, TO THE FEDERAL AVIATION
ADMINISTRATION FOR REVIEW AND
PROCESSING.
WHEREAS in June of 1992, the Federal Aviation Administration completed its review and
approved the PFC charge of $3.00 per enplaned passenger to pay for the Airport terminal
building expansion; and
WHEREAS in June of 1993, the Palm Springs Airport askedfor an Amendment to the PFC
to split the terminal project into two phases and allow for a ten-year implementation schedule,
which was approved; and
WHEREAS in November of 1999, the terminal expansion project, both phases, was
completed; and
WHEREAS Fiscal Year 2001/02 is the first year of full debt service for the three bond issues
utilized to finance the terminal expansion project and that debt exceeds PFC collections by
some $900,000 annually; and
WHEREAS on June 29, 2001, the Airport notified all air carriers serving the Palm Springs
International Airport of a consultation meeting to be held on July 30, 2001, to discuss raising
the PFC from $3.00 to $4.50; and
WHEREAS on July 30, 2001, said consultation meeting was held with full concurrence from
those in attendance; and
WHEREAS the thirty -day comment period for airline certification of agreement or
disagreement with the PFC Amendment has passed with all carriers either certifying approval
or not commenting; and
WHEREAS based upon the Palm Springs International Airport Commission action to
recommend this Amendment, and the airlines' concurrence, the City Council is desirous of
submitting a Second Amendment to the PFC as follows.
Section 1. That Amendment #2 to PFC 92-01-C-01 PSP, increasing the amount from
$3.00 to $4.50 per enplaned passenger is hereby approved for submittal to the
Federal Aviation Administration.
R20160
September 5, 2001
Page Two
Section 2. That the Assistant City Manager - Special Projects is hereby authorized to
execute all necessary application materials and submit the Amendment on
behalf of the City of Palm Springs and Palm Springs International Airport.
ADOPTED this 5th day of -September—, 2001.
AYES: Members Hodges, Jones, Reller-Spurgin and Mayor Kleindienst
NOES: None
ABSENT: Member Oden
ATTEST: CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA
By /s/PATRICIA A. SANDERS
City Clerk
REVIEWED & APPROVED AS TO FORM:
/s/DAVID H. READY
City Manager
i HL"BY MTIFY THAT TM FOREGOING IS A TRUE COPY OF
kvwxUrION No. ,&2V (P C% DULY ADOPTED BY THR
CWY COUNCIL OF THE C rrV OF PALM SPRINGS iN A MEETING
IMREOF HELD ON THE `7 a DAY OF j
DATED I4T PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNL%
CS2Cz1Y CL8'tm
OF •AiM 5PREM& CALWORM
?o2m
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (If appropriate, include explanation of recommendation,
congressional interest, pertinent background, etc.):
Application Reviewed by:
Name Routing Symbol Date
Revised 10/2100
AIR CARRIER CONSULTATION
SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE APPROVED PASSENGER FACILITY CHARGE
Palm Springs International Airport
July 30, 2001
An intense effort has been undertaken to involve the air carriers serving Palm Springs
International Airport in the consultation process leading to the submittal of the Second Amendment.
On June 29, 2001, Notices of a Consultation Meeting, to be held on July 30, 2001, along with
an Air Carrier Consultation Packet, (copy attached) were sent to all air carriers serving the Airport.
Shown below is a listing of those air carriers notified along with a column designating whether or
not registered receipts were received and a column designating whether or not written
acknowledgment was received. (Copies of registered receipts and written acknowledgments
attached.)
Air Carrier
Mesa Airlines
Alaska Airlines
American Airlines
America West Airlines
United Airlines
SkyWest Airlines
Northwest Airlines
Canada 3000 Airlines
Wings West Airlines
Continental Airlines
Returned Registered Receipt
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Written Acknowledgment
No
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
On July 30, 2001, at 11:00 a.m. (Local), the required air carrier consultation was held with the
following airlines present (via conference call):
Alaska Airlines SkyWest Airlines
(A copy of the roster of attendees is attached.)
During the session, a complete review of the consultation package was undertaken. An in-
depth discussion of the financial implication of the proposed amendment was provided and
questions were answered. At the conclusion, the airlines represented stated their unanimous
support and promised written confirmation immediately.
Following the meeting, summary minuteswere prepared and mailed to all aircarriers serving
Palm Springs International Airport, whetheror not they had provided the required acknowledgments.
(Copy of cover letter, mailing list and minutes attached.)
AIR CARRIER CONSULTATION PACKET
Second Amendment
to the
APPROVED PASSENGER FACILITY CHARGE
Palm Springs International Airport
PFC # 91-01-C-00-PSP As Amended
Dated: June 29, 2001
PUBLIC AGENCY INFORMATION
Agency: City of Palm Springs
3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way
Palm Springs, CA 92262
Airport to Use: Palm Springs International Airport
3400 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way
Palm Springs, CA 92262
Responsible Official: Allen F. Smoot, AAE
(760) 318-3900
AIR CARRIER CONSULTATION
Date Written Notice Sent to Carriers:
June 29, 2001
Date of Consultation Meeting With Carriers: July 30, 2001
NOTICE
AIR CARRIER CONSULTATION
PASSENGER FACILITY CHARGE - AMENDMENT #2
PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA
NOTICE IS HEREBY PROVIDED, as of this 29th day of June 2001, per Part 158 Federal
Aviation Regulations, of the intent of the Palm Springs International Airport, which is owned and
operated by the City of Palm Springs, California, to hold consultation with all air carriers and foreign
air carriers serving Palm Springs International Airport concerning the increase of the Airport's
Passenger Facility Charge from $3.00 to $4.50, Amendment No. 2.
The use for the Airport's Passenger Facility Charge is not being changed; however, the
amount is being increased to cover the full debt on all three (3) existing bond issues that fund the
original Passenger Facility Charge approved projects.
The level of the charge is proposed to increase from $3.00 to $4.50, with a proposed effective
date of January 1, 2002, and an estimated expiration date of June 30, 2024. It is estimated that the
total Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) revenues collected will equal $76,883,179.
The Airport shall continue its approved practice that all Part 135 air taxi operators be exempt
from the collection of the increased charge. The Part 135 air taxis known to operate at the Airport
and their 1999 reported enplanements are, as follows:
Aircharter Express, Inc. 1
American Jet Charter, Inc. 5
American Jet International Corporation 2
Executive Flight, Inc. (Washington) 9
Glynn Air, Inc. 4
Midamerica Jet, Inc. 2
Midwest Corporate Aviation, Inc. 4
Modesto Executive Air Charter, Inc. 7
Pacific States Aviation, Inc. 2
Witte, Albert A. 2
Total Calendar 1999 Air Taxi Enplanements: 38
Compared to the total enplanements of 634,660 for the same period, this proposed continued
exempted class represents approximately .00006% of annual enplanements. The Airport's continued
request for this exemption is based on the fact that administrative costs for the Airport would far
exceed the annual revenue of $168 from this class.
The Palm Springs International Airport will present the proposed Amendment to the
domestic and foreign air carriers serving it on July 30, 2001, at I1:00 a.m. (Local) at the Palm
Springs International Airport Conference Room, 3400 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way, Palm Springs,
California 92262. For the consultation meeting, a conference call opportunity will also be provided.
To receive specifics on the conference call number and participant codes, please contact the Airport
offices at 760/318-3800 no earlier than 48 hours prior to the meeting. Attached, please find the Air
Carrier Consultation Packet concerning this proposed Amendment. Questions may be directed to
Allen Smoot, (760) 318-3901.
Signed:
ALLEN F. SMOOT, AAE
Interim Director of Aviation
Dated: 254, ?_o o i
SUMMARY OF PACKET
AIR CARRIER CONSULTATION
PASSENGER FACILITY CHARGE - AMENDMENT #2
The attached packet of information is provided to the air carriers serving Palm Springs International
Airport per Part 158 Federal Aviation Regulations for consultation purposes related to an increase
in Passenger Facility Charge from $3.00 to $4.50. This packet includes:
1. Cover Page
2. Notice
3. Summary
4. FAA Form 5500 - 1
5. Attachment "A" 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan
6. Attachment "B" Project Information
7. Airport Cash Flow Projection
This Amendment would raise the PFC to $4.50 to allow for the Airport to cover the full cost of debt
on all three outstanding bond issues. The total collected would be reduced from $82,888,914 to
$76,883,179. Due to early redemption provisions of the bond issues, the PFC term will be reduced
from 10/30/32 to 6/30/24. Finally, the Airport Cash Flow Projection shows no rates and charges
increase this coming year; without the Amendment, there would be an approximate $900,000
increase.
OMB Approved 2120-0557
0 PASSENGER FACILITY CHARGE (PFC) APPLICATION
U. S. Department of Transportation
Federal Aviation Administration
_
1. Application Type (Check all that apply) FAA USE O'NLY11.
❑ a. Impose PFC Charges
Date Received PFC Number
❑ b. Use PFC Revenue
E c• Amend PFC No. 91-01-C-Oi-PSP
PART
2. Public Agency Name, Address, and Contact Person
3. Airport(s) to Use
4. Consultation Dates
a. Date of Written Notice to Air Carriers:
Agency Name: City of Palm Springs
Address 3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way
June 29,2001
Palm Springs International
City_State,ZIP: Parm Springs, CA 92262
Airport (PSP)
b. Date of Consultation Meeting with Air
Carriers:
Contact Person Allen F. Smoot (760) 318-3900)
July 30, 2001
PART II
5. Charges
a. Airport to Impose
b. Level
c. Total Estimated PFC
d. Proposed Effective
e. Estimated Expiration
Revenue by Level
Date:
Date:
Palm Springs International
Impose
Airport (PSP)
❑ $1.00 ❑ $2.00 51'f3.00 (see 4a Attachment B)
Existing Use 82,888,919.
January 1, 2002
June 30, 2024
_
i Impose
❑ $4.00 Mlf4.50 ' (see 4a Attachment B)
Proposed i Use 76,883,179.
PART Ili _
6. Attachments (Check all that Apply)
_
Attached Submitted with Application Number Document
a. 0� ❑ Airport Capital Improvement Plan
b. ❑ Project Information (Attachment B)
C. ❑ ❑ Air Carrier Consultation Information
d. ❑ 1-01-C-01-PSP Request to Exclude Class(es) of Carriers
e. ❑ ❑ Alternative Uses/Projects
f. ❑ ❑ Competitson PlanlUlpdate
g. ❑ 1-01-C-01-PSP ALP/Airspace/Environmental
h. ❑ ❑
PART IV
7. With respect to this PFC application I hereby certify as follows:
To the best of my knowledge and belief, all data in this application are true and correct;
This application has been duly authorized by the governing body of the public agency;
The public agency will comply with the attached assurances if the application is approved:
For those projects for which approval to use PFC revenue is requested, all applicable ALP approvals, airspace determinations, and
environmental reviews required by the National Environmental Policy Act have been completed.
If required, the public agency has submitted a competition plan in accordance with 49 U.S.C. 47106(0; and
If required by 49 U.S.C. 40117(d)(4), adequate provision for financing the a;rside needs, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and gates, has
been made by the public agency.
a.Typed Name of Authorized Representative b. Title c. Telephone Number
(760)318-3900
Allen F. Smoot Interim Director of Aviation d. Fax Number
(760) 318-3815
_
F Signature of Authorized Representative f. Date Signed
FAA Form 5600-1 (8-00) Supersedes Previous Edition
ATTACHMENT "A"
Document: Five Year Capital Improvement Program
Sponsor: City of Palm Springs
Airport: Palm Springs International Airport
Item
Project
Estimated
Cost
Funding
Source(s)
Funding
FAA
Funding
PSP
Year: 2002
02-1
Terminal Expansion - Holdrooms Gates 1, 2 & 3 - Phase II $
1,855,280
FAA 75% - PSP 25% $
1,391,460
$ 463,820
02-2
Rehab - Reconstruct Commuter Ramp $
1,200,000
FAA 90% - PSP 10% $
1,080,000
$ 120,000
02-3
Security System Upgrades & Rehab $
200,000
FAA 90% - PSP 10% $
180,000
$ 20,000
02-4
East SIDA Access Relocation 1 Fence & Road Work $
600,000
FAA 90% - PSP 10% $
540,000
$ 60,000
02-5
Part 139 OPS Data Base & Records Management System$
250,000
FAA 90% - PSP 10% $
225,000
$ 25,000
02-6
Terminal Wall Covering Replacement $
60,000
PSP 100%
$ 60,000
Subtotal $
4,165,280
$
3,416,460
$ 748,820
Year: 2003
03-1
Expand Loop Road (Terminal Access)
$
2,000,000
FAA 90% -
PSP 10% $
1,800,000
$ 200,000
03-2
Volturno Access Road (Industrial Park)
$
1,980,000
FAA 90% -
PSP 10% $
1.782.000
$ 198,000
03-3
Relocate Segmented Circle & ASOS
$
297,000
FAA 90% -
PSP 10% $
267.300
$ 29,700
03-4
Taxiway "G" Rehab
$
594,000
FAA 90% -
PSP 10% $
534.600
$ 59,400
03-6
Replace Runway Sweeper
$
200,000
FAA 90% -
PSP 10% $
180,000
$ 20,000
03-6
Phase VI Noise Mitigation (Insulation)
$
2,000,000
FAA 90% -
PSP 10% $
1,800,000
$ 200,000
03-7
Terminal Painting
$
100,000
PSP 100%
$ 100,000
0
Subtotal $
7,171,000
$
6,363,900
$ 807,100
Year: 2004
04-1
Seal Coat 131J31 R & Taxiways
$
100,000
FAA 90% -
PSP 10% $
90,000
$ 10,000
04-2
Reconstruct Air Carrier Aircraft Aprom
$
1.584,000
FAA 90% -
PSP 10% $
1,425,600
$ 158.400
04-3
T-Hangar Taxiways
$
700,000
FAA 90% -
PSP 10% $
630,000
$ 70,000
04-4
Construct High Speed Taxiway (North)
$
800,000
FAA 90% -
PSP 10% $
720,000
$ 80,000
04-5
Pahase VII Noise Mitigation (Insulation)
$
2,000,000
FAA 90% -
PSP 10% $
1,800,000
$ 200,000
04-6
Carpet Replacement
$
200,000
PSP 100%
$ 200,000
Subtotal $ 6,384,000 $ . 4,665,600 $ 718,400
Year: 2005
05-1
Noise Monitoring System
$
1,000,000
FAA 90% - PSP 10% $
900,000 $
100,000
05-2
Construct Air Carrier Ramp
$
3,000.000
FAA 90% - PSP 10% $
2,700,000 $
300,000
05-3
Rehab Commuter Ramp Phase II
$
500,000
FAA 90%- PSP 10% $
450,000 $
50,000
05-4
Carpet Replacement
$
200,000
PSP 100%
$
200,000
05-5
Terminal Furniture Replacement
$
150,000
PSP 100%
$
150,000
Subtotal $ 4,850,000 $ 4,060,000 $ 800;000Z
Year: 2006
06-1 Construct High Speed Taxiway (South)
$
800,000
FAA 90% - PSP 10% $
720,000
$
80,000
06-2 Loading Bridges at Gates 1, 2 & 3
$
2,000,000
FAA 75% - PSP 25% $
1,500,000
$
500,000
06-3 Air Carrier Ramp
$
1.300,000
FAA 90% - PSP 10% $
1,170,000
$
130,000
06A Terminal Furniture Replacement
$
150,000
PSP 100%
$
150,000
Subtotal $
4,250,000
$
3,390,000
$
860,000
r
Total Expenditure
"'"
"""""""'
$
21,885,960
$ 3,934,320
ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION
*****FOR FAA USE*******************************************************************
PFC Application number:
1. AIRPORT WHERE PROJECT IS LOCATED:
Palm Springs International Airport
3400 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way
Palm Springs, California 92262
Contact: Allen F. Smoot, AAE, Assistant City Manager- Special Projects
2. CHECK ONE: IMPOSE[ ] IMPOSE AND USE [X] USE[ ]
3. PROJECT TITLE (And Public Agency Project Number, If Appropriate):
Terminal Expansion Debt Service - Full Coverage
4.a. PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Increase PFC from $3 to $4.50 to cover full debt service on previously
approved and constructed terminal expansion projects. No new work, only
additional PFC's to cover existing debt on the three PFC approved projects
or as they may be refinanced Total PFC's to be collected will drop from
the current approval level of $82,888,919 to $76,883,179 and termination
date will change from 10130132 to 6130124.
b. If applicable for terminal projects,
1. Prior to this project, number of ticket counters , gates , and baggage facilities
2. Number of ticket counters , gates , and baggage facilities to be
constructed or rehabilitated.
3. Net change in ticket counters , gates , and baggage
facilities
*****FOR FAA USE*******************************************************************
a. Description adequate [ ] not adequate [ ] (indicate deficiencies below)
b. If the project involves the construction of a new runway or modification of an existing
runway, the requirements of Order 5200.8, with regard to runway safety areas have
been met. YES[ ] NO [ ].
c. For terminal projects, information regarding ticket counters, gates, and baggage
facilities for construction and/or rehabilitation indicated. YES [ ] NO [ ] NIA [ ]
d. Comments:
5. LEVEL OF COLLECTION: $1.00[ ] $2.00[ ] $3.00[ ] (go to 6)
$4.00[ ] $4.50[x] (public agencies of medium and large hub
airports go to 7, all others go to 6)
6. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:
The previously approved/as amended PFC application was for renovations
and expansion of the Terminal Building. To accomplish that, three sets of
bonds, 1992 GARB, 1998 GARB and the 1998 PFC, were issued. The
combined annual debt service for the three issues is $2,535,018 (varies
slightly each year). PFC's are currently allowed to pay debt on all three
issues; however collections of approximately $1.6 million (current) leave
the airport some $900,000 short. Skyrocketing utility costs at the Airport
are outstripping the Airport's ability to pay current debt and utilities
without causing large rates and charges increases. Such increases would
reduce the Airport's competitiveness in the Southern California market and
any loss of service due to increased cost would be devastating to the local
economy.
*****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************
a. Is justification adequate? YES[ ] NO[ ].
b. Comments:
7. SIGNIFICANT CONTRIBUTION:
N/A
*****FOR FAA USE****************************************#*#****,►********************
a. _ Air safety. Part 139 [ ] Other (explain)
Certification Inspector concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date
Air security. Part 107 [ ] Part 108 [ ] Other (explain)
CASFO concur. Yes[ ] No[ ] Date
Competition. Competition Plan [ ] Other (explain)
Congestion. Current[ ] or Anticipated [ ]
LOI [ ] FAA BCA [ ] FAA Airport Capacity Enhancement Plan
Other (explain)
Noise. 65 LDN [ ] Other (explain)
Project does not qualify under "significant contribution " rules. (explain and go to
6. Project Justification - FOR FAA USE - for analysis).
b. Comments:
8. PROJECT OBJECTIVE:
The previously approved project was approved as a capacity enhancement
project for the Airport. This amendment is requested to allow the Airport to
pay all debt related to the approved project from PFC revenues.
*****FOR FAA USE****************************************{***************************
a. _ Safety, Preserve[ ] Enhance[ ]
Security, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ]
Capacity, Preserve[ ] Enhance[ ]
Furnish opportunity for enhanced competition between or among air carriers at
the airport
Mitigate noise impacts resulting from aircraft operations at the airport
Project does not meet any PFC objectives (explain)
b. Comments:
9. FOR FAA USE (Public agencies go to
a. Project Eligibility:
1) Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below.
[ ] Development eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph of Order 5100.38_ or
PGL
[ ] Planning eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph of Order 5100.38_ or PGL
[ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 47110(d);
[ ] Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C. 47505;
[ ] Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C. 47504. Check one of the
following - project approved in an approved Part 150 noise compatibility plan [ ]; or,
project included in a local study[ ]. Include Title and Date of local study:
[ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 40117(a)(3)(C);
[ ] Shell of a gate as described in 49 U.S.0 40117(a)(3)(F) (air carrier ,
percentage of annual boardings __);or
[ ] Project does not meet PFC eligibility (explain).
b. Comments:
10. ESTIMATED PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION DATE (Month and Year): 5192
ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE (Month and Year): 11199
AM phases of the project were previously completed. This amendment
deals only with a PFC increase to cover the total debt on the previously
completed project.
*****FOR FAA
a. For IMPOSE AND USE or USE -ONLY project, project will begin within 2 years of
120-day approval date? YES [ ] NO[ ]
b. For IMPOSE ONLY project, project will begin within 5 years of the charge effective
date or approval date, whichever is sooner? YES[ ] NO [ ]
c. Comments:
11. For an IMPOSE ONLY project, estimated date USE application will be submitted to
the FAA (Month and Year):
*****FOR FAA
a. Is the date within 3 years of the estimated charge effective date or approval date,
�' whichever is sooner? YES [ ] NO [ ].
b. Comments:
12. LIST CARRIERS CERTIFYING AGREEMENT:
13. LIST CARRIERS CERTIFYING DISAGREEMENT:
Recap of Disagreements:
Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding:
*****FOR FAA USE***************#******t***t**************************************
a. Comments:
14. FINANCING PLAN:
PFC FUNDS: Pay-as-you-go $ N/A
Bond Capital $ N/A
Bond Financing & Interest $ 76,883,179. (Note: Three separate bond issues.)
*** SUBTOTAL PFC FUNDS: $ 76,883,179.
EXISTING AIP FUNDS:
Grant # Grant Funds in Project $
AIP 3-06-0181-24 $1,722,584 — Creative Financing Grant
AIP 3-06-0181-26 $3,165,730 — Terminal Ramp/Utilities/Generator
*** SUBTOTAL EXISTING AIP FUNDS: $4,888,314
ANTICIPATED AIP FUNDS (List Each Year Separately): N/A
Fiscal Year: Entitlement $
N/A
Discretionary $ Total $
*** SUBTOTAL ANTICIPATED AIP FUNDS: $ -0-
OTHER FUNDS:
State Grants $ N/A
Local Funds $ 543,146
Other (please specify) $ N/A
*** SUBTOTAL OTHER FUNDS: $ 543,146.
*** TOTAL PROJECT COST: $ 82,314,639
The following two spreadsheets demonstrate projected PFC collections,
beginning in January 2002, and the pay down of the three separate bond
issues. Please note that the bonds have early redemption allowances,
which provides that as fast as PFC-s are collected, bonds can be called
out. Note that projections show actual debt retirement in 2023, the
remaining PFC collection is to reimburse the Airport for debt that will be
paid in years 2001 through 2008 payable from rates and charges and for
administrative costs.
CITY OF PALM SPRINGS
CALCU i ATION OF PASSENGER FACILITY GARGES
BASED ON $4.50
Enplaned
Adjusted
Total
Cumulative
Passenger
%
PFC
Enplaned
PFC
PFC
PFC
Forecast
Growth
Eligible
Passengers
Rate
Revenues
Revenues
1993
427,170
870,509
870,509
1994
474,859
1,287,524
2,158,033
1995
469,662
1,149.224
3,307,257
1996
543,951
1,448,382
4,755,639
1997
560,747
1,527,494
6,283,133
1998
602,803
1,554,740
7,837,873
1999
663,083
1,600,033
9.437,906
2000
622,038
80,00/6
497,630
2.92
1,453,081
10,890,987
2001
620,000
0.0%
80.0%
496,000
3.86
1,916,320
12,807,307
2002
628,258
1.3%
80.0%
502,600
4.42
2,221,492
15,028,799
2003
637,682
1.5%
80.0%
510,100
4,42
2,254,642
17,283,441
2004
653,624
2.5%
80.0%
522,900
4.42
2,311,218
19,594,659
2005
673,233
3.0%
80.0%
538,600
4.42
2.380,612
21,975,271
2006
693,430
3.0%
80.0%
554,700
4.42
2.451,774
24,427,045
2007
714,233
3.0%
80.0%
571,400
4.42
2.525,588
26,952,633
2008
735,660
3.0%
80.0%
588,500
4.42
2,601,170
29,553,803
2009
757,730
3.0%
80.0%
606,200
4.42
2,679,404
32,233,207
2010
780,462
3.0%
80.0%
624,400
4.42
2,759,848
34,993,055
2011
803,875
3.0%
80.0%
643,100
4.42
2,842,502
37,835,557
2012
819,953
2.0%
80.0%
656,000
4.42
2,899,520
40,735,077
2013
836,352
2.0%
80.0%
669,100
4.42
2,957,422
43,692,499
2014
853,079
2.0%
80.0%
682,500
4.42
3,016,650
46,709.149
2015
870,141
2.0%
80.0%
696,100
4.42
3,076.762
49,785,911
2016
878,842
1.0%
80.0%
703,100
4.42
3.107,702
52,893,613
2017
887.631
1.0%
80.0%
710,100
4.42
3,138,642
56,032,255
2018
896,507
1.00/6
80.0%
717,200
4,42
3,170,024
59,202,279
2019
905,472
1.0%
80.0%
724,400
4.42
3,201,848
62,404,127
2020
914,527
1.0%
80.0%
731,600
4.42
3.233,672
65,637,799
2021
923,672
1.0%
80.0%
738,900
4.42
3,265,938
68,903.737
2022
932,909
1.0%
80.0%
746,300
4.42
3,298.646
72,202.383
2023
942.238
1.0%
80.0%
753,800
4.42
3,331,796
75,534,179
2024
951,660
1.0%
80.0%
761,300
4.42
1,349,000
76,883,179
IN
CITY OF PALM SPRINGS
PASSENGER FACILITY CHARGE REVENUES APPLIED TO DEBT SERVICE
(INCREASED PFC TO $4.50)
1998 PFC Bonds
Apply to
GARBS
GARBS DS
Debt Service on
Special
Available
Debt Service on
Early
Remaining
Payable from
PFC
Revenue
199R PFC Bonds*
Redemption
for CARRS
AIRBS"
Redemption
,CFCs
Rates and Chp
2001
1,916,320
(846,250)
-
1,070,070
(1,070,070)
-
-
693,954
2002
2,221,492
(847,113)
-
1,374,380
(1,374,380)
-
-
390,542
2003
2,254,642
(847,378)
-
1,407,265
(1,407,265)
-
-
356.979
2004
2,311,218
(846,918)
-
1,464,301
(1,464,301)
-
-
297,413
2005
2,380,612
(845,768)
-
1.534.845
(1,534,845)
-
-
227,359
2006
2,451,774
(848.790)
-
1,602,984
(1,602,984)
-
-
155,997
2007
2,525,588
(845,963)
-
1,679,626
(1,679,626)
-
-
84,103
2008
2,601,170
(847.403)
-
1,753,768
(1,753,768)
-
-
12,341
2009
2,679.404
(847,818)
-
1,831,587
(1,761,004)
(70,583)
-
-
2010
2,759,848
(847,193)
-
1,912,656
(1,763,704)
(148,952)
-
-
2011
2,842,502
(845,818)
-
1,996.685
(1,763,804)
(232,881)
-
-
2012
2,899,520
(848,390)
-
2,051,130
(1,761,186)
(289,944)
-
-
2013
2.957,422
(849,728)
-
2,107,694
(1,760,688)
(347,006)
-
-
2014
3,016,650
(845,125)
-
2,171,525
(1,767,291)
(404,234)
-
-
2015
3,076,762
(849,497)
-
2,227,265
(1,760,553)
(466,712)
-
-
2016
3,107,702
(847,716)
-
2,259,986
(1,760,775)
(499,211)
-
-
2017
3,138.642
(844,909)
(393,613)
1,900,120
(1,762,528)
(137,592)
-
-
2018
3,170.024
(845,950)
(488,642)
1,835,432
(1,760,513)
(74,920)
-
-
2019
3,201,848
(845,394)
(520,024)
1,836,430
(1,759,388)
(77,043)
-
-
2020
3.233.672
(848,094)
(551,848)
1,833,730
(1,764,02)
(69,718)
-
-
2021
3,265,938
(849,219)
(583,672)
1,833,047
(1,764,119)
(68,929)
-
-
22
3,298,646
(848,769)
(615,938)
1,833,939
(1,759,406)
(74,533)
-
-
4023
3,331,796
(845,963)
(648,646)
1,837,188
(300.000)
-
1,537,188
-
2024
1,349,000
-
-
1,349,000
-
-
1,349,000
-
Admin Costs @ 30,000/yr
660,000
PFC Amend#2 Cost to Prepare
7,500
Totals
2.886.188
2,886,188
* PFC Debt Service Adjusted for any Special Redemptions
** GARB Debt Service Adjusted for any Early Redemptions
***PROJECT REQUESTING PFC FUNDING LEVELS OF $4.00 AND $4.50:
a. Project costs cannot be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available
through AIP funding. YES [X ] NO [ ]
b. If the FAA determines that the project may qualify for AIP funding, the public agency
would prefer that the FAA approve the amount of the local match to be collected at a
$4.50 PFC level [ X] OR the entire requested amount at a $3.00 PFC level [ ].
c. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made
adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways,
taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. YES [X ] NO [ ] NIA [ ]
d. Comments.
N/A
*****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************
a. Does the project include a proposed LOI? YES [ ] NO [ ] If YES, does the
Region support? YES [ ] NO [ ]. If YES, list the schedule for implementation:
b. For any proposed AIP discretionary funds, does the Region intend to support? YES
[ ] NO[ ]
c. For any proposed AIP funds, is the request within the planning levels for the
Region's five year CIP? YES [ ] NO [ ]
d. For project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50:
Project costs cannot be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding.
Tersminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for
financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. YES [
] NO[ ] NIA [ I
e. Comments.
15. BACK-UP FINANCING PLAN:
Continue to operate under existing $3.00 PFC approval, raise airline rates
and charges, and hope for increased non -airline revenues.
*****FOR FAA USE******«***************************************************************
a. Is the back-up financing/phasing plan viable? Yes [ ] No [ ].
b. Comments:
C'
*****FOR FAA USE*********«««******************t*t***********************«**********
ADO/RO RECOMMENDATION: Approve [ ] Partially Approve [ ] Disapprove [ ]
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (If appropriate, include explanation of recommendation,
congressional interest, pertinent background, etc.):
Application Reviewed by:
Name Routing Symbol Date
FAA
Passenger Facility Charge
Raise to $4.50
AGREEMENT #3122 AMEND 2
R20160, 9-5-01
1' 1
PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
AMERICA'S RESORTPORT
SECOND AMENDMENT
TO THE
APPROVED PASSENGER FACILITY CHARGE
(Amended PFC No. 91-01-C-01 PSP)
?ALM sA
4
u N_
R
C'411FOIL
SUBMITTED
�i SEPTEMBER 7, 2001
BY AIRPORT SPONSOR
J
TABLE
OF
CONTENTS
COVER LETTER
AMENDMENT APPLICATION 2
G 3
AIRLINE CONSULTATION
CERTIFICATION OF 4
AG REEMENTIDISAGREEMENT
SPONSOR APPROVAL 5
G
..........
L Q
+�ORAlfO
c���fioRc+�a�
September 6, 2001
Jaime Duran AWP-612
City of Palm Springs
Office of the Assistant City Manager - Special Projects
%4W Tahquitz Canyon Way • Palm Springs, California 92262
TEL: (760) 118-3900 - FAX: i760; i Lfl-3815 • TDD: (760) 864-9527
Supervisor, Programming Section
Western Pacific Region Airports Division
15000 Aviation Blvd.
Lawndale, CA 90261
RE: Palm Springs International Airport Passenger Facility Charge Amendment #2
Dear Mr. Duran:
Palm Springs International Airport herewith transmits two (2) copies of an Amendment to
PFC No. 91 -01 -C-01 -PSP. The purpose of this Amendment is to raise the collection level
from $3.00 to $4.50 for the sole purpose of raising enough revenue to pay the full debt
service on the three existing bond issues which were utilized to fund the Airport's
previously approved PFC projects.
Since the 1998 bond issues have early redemption provisions, as fast as PFC's are
collected bonds can be paid down. As a result of the early redemption provisions, we are
projecting that our termination date will change from the current October 30, 2032 to June
30, 2024, and that overall collection will be reduced from $82,888,919 to $76,883,179.
Through the consultation process, the Airport has achieved a 100% support level from the
air carriers serving the Airport and therefore requests that this Amendment be processed
under 158.37(b)(1). To meet the Airport's financial needs, this Amendment was offered
to the air carriers with an expected first collection date of January 1, 2002. The Airport
respectfully requests whatever assistance in expediting approvals can be provided by the
Federal Aviation Administration.
Post Office Box 2743 0 Palm Springs, California 92263-2743
Letter to Jaime Duran
September 6, 2001- Page Two
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (760) 318-3900.
Si cerely,
1*4L-
ALLEN F. SMOOT, AAE
Interim Director of Aviation
AFS:ps
ATTACHMENT - PFC Amendment (2 copies)
cc: nth two copies each of PFC Amendment)
John Milligan, AWP 621
Supervisor, Standards Section
FAA Western Pacific Region Airports Division
15000 Aviation Blvd.
Lawndale CA 90261
Sheryl A. Scarborough, Management and Program Analyst
PFC Branch, APP 530
FAA - Office of Airport Planning & Programming
Airports Financial Assistance Division
800 Independence Ave., S.W. RM #613
Washington, D.C. 20591
r OMB Approved 2120-0667
PASSENGER FACILITY CHARGE (PFC) APPLICATION
U. S. Department of Transportation
Federal Aviation Administration _
1. Application T FAA U_ pp Type (Check all that apply) ..,# j
❑ a. Impose PFC Charges y
Date Received PFC Number
❑ b. Use PFC Revenue
® c. Amend PFC No 91-01-C-00-PSP
PART 1
2. Public Agency Name, Address, and Contact Person
3. Airport(s) to Use
4. Consultation Dates
Agency Name: City of Palm Springs
a. Date of Written Notice to Air Carriers:
Address: 3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way
June 29,2001
Palm Springs International
City,Stale,ZIP; Palm Springs, CA 92262
Airport (PSP)
b. Date of Consultation Meeting with Air
Carriers:
Contact Person: Allen F. Smoot (760) 318-3900)
July 30, 2001
PART If
S. Charges
a. Airport to Impose
b, Level
c. Total Estimated PFC
d. Proposed Eftctive
e. Estimated Expiration
Revenue by Level_
Date:
Date:
Palm Springs International
_
Impose
Airport (PSP)
❑ $1.00 ❑ $2.00 ® $3.00
Existing
Use $11,615,W.
January 1, 2002
June 30, 2024
Impose - ---------
--
❑ $4.00 ID$4.50
Proposed
Use $65,268,032.
PART III
6. Attachments Check all that Applyl
Attached Submitted with Application Number Document
a. ® ❑ Airport Capital Improvement Plan
b. ❑ Project Information (Attachment B)
C. ® ❑ Air Carrier Consultation Information
d. ❑ ® 91-01-C-00-PSP 2126/92 Request to Exclude Class(es) of Carriers
e. ❑ ® 91-01-C-00-PSP 2/26/92 Alternative Uses/Projects
f. ❑ ❑ N/A Competition Plan/Update Small Hub Exempt
g. ❑ ® 91-01-C40-PSP 2/26/92 ALP/Airspace/Environmental
h. ❑ ❑
PART IV
7. With respect to this PFC application I hereby certify as follows:
To the best of my knowledge and belief, all data in this application are true and correct;
This application has been duly authorized by the governing body of the public agency;
The public agency will comply with the attached assurances if the application is approved:
For those projects for which approval to use PFC revenue is requested, all applicable ALP approvals, airspace determinations, and
environmental reviews required by the National Environmental Policy Act have been completed.
If required, the public agency has submitted a competition plan in accordance with 49 U.S.C. 47106(f); and
If required by 49 U.S.C. 40117(d)(4), adequate provision for financing the airside needs, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and gates, has
been made by the public agency.
a. Typed Name of Authorized Representative
b, Title
c. Telephone Number
(760) 318-3900
Allen F. Smoot
Interim Director of Aviation
d. Fax Number
{760) 318 3815
e. Sig to r epresentative
f. Date irgn
W
FAA Form 6500-1 (8-00) Supersedes Previous Edition
ATTACHMENT "A"
Document: Five Year Capital Improvement Program
Sponsor: City of Palm Springs
Airport: Palm Springs International Airport
Item
Project
Estimated
Cost
Funding
Source(s)
Funding
FAA
Funding
PSP
Year: 2002
02-1
Terminal Expansion - Holdrooms Gates 1, 2 & 3 - Phase II $
1,855,280
FAA 75% - PSP 25%
$ 1,391,460
$
463,820
02-2
Rehab - Reconstruct Commuter Ramp $
1,200,000
FAA 90% - PSP 10%
$ 1,080,000
$
120,000
02-3
Security System Upgrades & Rehab $
200,000
FAA 90% - PSP 10%
$ 180,000
$
20,000
02-4
East SIUA Access Relocation ! Fence & Road Work $
600,000
FAA 90% - PSP 10%
$ 540,000
$
60,000
02-5
Part 139 OPS Data Base & Records Management System$
250,000
FAA 90% - PSP 10%
$ 225,000
$
25,000
02-6
Terminal Wall Covering Replacement $
60,000
PSP 100%
$
60,000
Subtotal $
4,165,280
$ 3,416,460
$
748,820
Year: 2003
03-1
Expand Loop Road (Terminal Access)
$
2.000,000
FAA 90%
- PSP 10% $
1,800,000
$
200.000
03-2
Volturno Access Road (Industrial Park)
$
1.980.000
FAA 90%
- PSP 10% $
1.782,000
$
198,000
03-3
Relocate Segmented Circle & ASOS
$
297,000
FAA 90%
- PSP 10% $
267,300
$
29,700
03-4
Taxiway "G" Rehab
$
594,000
FAA 90%
- PSP 10% $
534,600
$
59,400
03-5
Replace Runway Sweeper
$
200,000
FAA 90%
- PSP 10% $
180.000
$
20,000
03-6
Phase VI Noise Mitigation (Insulation)
$
2,000,000
FAA 90%
- PSP 10% $
1.800.000
$
200.000
03-7
Terminal Painting
$
100,000
PSP 100%
$
100.000
Subtotal $ 7,171,000 $ 6,363,900 $ 807,100
Year: 2004
04-1
Seal Coat 13L131 R & Taxiways
$
100,000
FAA 90%
- PSP 10% $
90,000
$ 10,000
04-2
Reconstruct Air Carrier Aircraft Aprom
$
1,584,000
FAA 90%
- PSP 10% $
1,425,600
$ 158.400
04-3
T-Hangar Taxiways
$
700,000
FAA 90%
- PSP 10% $
630,000
$ 70,000
04-4
Construct High Speed Taxiway (North)
$
800,000
FAA 90%
- PSP 10% $
720,000
$ 80,000
04-5
Pahase VII Noise Mitigation (Insulation)
$
2,000,000
FAA 90%
- PSP 10% $
1,800,000
$ 200,000
04-6
Carpet Replacement
$
200,000
PSP 100%
$ 200,000
Subtotal $ 5,38$,000 $ 4,665.600 $ 118,400
Year: 2005
05-1
Noise Monitoring System
$
1,000,000
FAA 90% - PSP 10% $
900.000 $
100,000
05-2
Construct Air Carrier Ramp
$
3.000,000
FAA 90% - PSP 10% $
2,700.000 $
300,000
05-3
Rehab Commuter Ramp Phase 11
$
500,000
FAA 90% - PSP 10% $
450,000 $
50,000
05-4
Carpet Replacement
$
200,000
PSP 100%
$
200,000
05-5
Terminal Furniture Replacement
$
150,000
PSP 100%
$
150:000
Subtotal $ 4,850,000 $ 4,050,000 $ 800,000
Year: 2006
06-1
Construct High Speed Taxiway (South)
$
800.000
FAA 90% - PSP 10% $
720.000
$
80,000
06-2
Loading Bridges at Gates 1, 2 & 3
$
2,000,000
FAA 75% - PSP 25% $
1,500.000
$
500.000
06-3
Air Carrier Ramp
$
1,300.000
FAA 90% - PSP 10% $
1,170.000
$
130,000
06A
Terminal Furniture Replacement
$
150,000
PSP 100%
$
150,000
Subtotal $
4,250,000
$
3,390,000
$
860,000
Total Expenditure
$ 21,885,960
$ 3,934,320
ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION
*****FOR FAA
PFC Application number:
1. AIRPORT WHERE PROJECT IS LOCATED:
Palm Springs International Airport
3400 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way
Palm Springs, California 92262
Contact. Allen F. Smoot, AAE, Interim Director of Aviation
2. CHECK ONE: IMPOSE[ ] IMPOSE AND USE[X ] USE[ ]
3. PROJECT TITLE (And Public Agency Project Number, If Appropriate):
Terminal Expansion Debt Service - Full Coverage
4.a. PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Increase PFC from $3 to $4.50 to cover full debt service on
previously approved and constructed terminal expansion projects.
No new work, only additional PFC's to cover existing debt on the
three PFC approved projects or as they maybe refinanced. Total
PFC's to be collected will drop from the current approval level of
$82,888,919 to $76,883,179 and termination date will change from
10130132 to 6130124.
b. If applicable for terminal projects, N/A (This Amendment is only to raise
the collection level on a completed project)
1. Prior to this project, number of ticket counters , gates , and
baggage facilities
2. Number of ticket counters , gates , and baggage facilities to
be constructed or rehabilitated.
3. Net change in ticket counters , gates , and baggage
facilities
*****FOR FAA USE*****************************************************************}*
a. Description adequate [ ] not adequate [ ] (indicate deficiencies below)
b. If the project involves the construction of a new runway or modification of an existing runway,
the requirements of Order 5200.8, with regard to runway safety areas have been met. YES[ ]
NO [ ].
c. For terminal projects, information regarding ticket counters, gates, and baggage facilities for
construction and/or rehabilitation indicated. YES [ ] NO [ ] NIA [ ]
d. Comments:
Revised 1012100
I
5. LEVEL OF COLLECTION: $1.00[ ] $2.00[ ] $3.00[ ] (go to 6)
$4.00[ ] $4.50[X] (public agencies of medium and large hub
airports go to 7, all others go to 6)
6. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:
The previously approved/as amended PFC application was for
renovations and expansion of the Terminal Building. To accomplish
that, three sets of bonds, 1992 GARB, 1998 GARB and the 1998 PFC,
were issued. The combined annual debt service for the three issues
is $2,535,018 (varies slightly each year). PFC's are currently allowed
to pay debt on all three issues; however, collections of
approximately $1.6 million (current) leave the airport some $900,000
short Skyrocketing utility costs at the Airport are outstripping the
Airports ability to pay current debt and utilities without causing large
rates and charges increases. Such increases would reduce the
Airport's competitiveness in the Southern California market and any
loss of service due to increased cost would be devastating to the
local economy.
*****FOR FAA USE***«***«*************************«***********************«*******
a. Is justification adequate? YES [ ] NO [ ].
b. Comments:
*******************************************************************************************
7. SIGNIFICANT CONTRIBUTION:
N/A (Small Hub)
*****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************
a. _ Air safety. Part 139 [ ] Other (explain)
Certification Inspector concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date
Air security. Part 107 [ ] Part 108 [ ] Other (explain)
CASFO concur. Yes[ ] No[ ] Date
Competition. Competition Plan [ ] Other (explain)
_ Congestion. Current [ ] or Anticipated [ ]
LOI [ ] FAA BCA [ ] FAA Airport Capacity Enhancement Plan [ ]
Other (explain)
_ Noise. 65 LDN [ ] Other (explain)
_ Project does not qualify under "significant contribution " rules. (explain and go to
6. Project Justification - FOR FAA USE — for analysis).
b. Comments:
*******************************************************************************************
8. PROJECT OBJECTIVE:
The previously approved project was approved as a capacity
{ enhancement for the Airport. Many carriers chose to schedule noon
hour turns to the point that adequate gates were not available. The
Revised 1012100
project added gates to the Airport Terminal. The Airport's gates are
non-exclusive and are controlled by the Airport This amendment is
only a request to raise the collection amount from $3.00 to $4.50 to
allow the Airport to pay all debt related to the approved project from
PFC revenues.
*****FOR FAA USE
a. _ Safety, Preserve[ ] Enhance[ ]
Security, Preserve[ ] Enhance[ ]
Capacity, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ]
_ Furnish opportunity for enhanced competition between or among air carriers at the airport
_ Mitigate noise impacts resulting from aircraft operations at the airport
_ Project does not meet any PFC objectives (explain)
b. Comments:
9. FOR FAA USE (Public agencies go to
a. Project Eligibility:
1) Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below.
[ ] Development eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph _ of Order 5100.38_ or
PGt_ __);
[ ] Planning eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph _ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL
[ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 47110(d);
[ ] Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C. 47505;
[ ] Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C. 47504. Check one of the
following - project approved in an approved Part 150 noise compatibility plan [ ]; or,
project included in a local study[ ]. Include Title and Date of local study:
[ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 40117(a)(3)(C);
[ ] Shell of a gate as described in 49 U.S.0 40117(a)(3)(F) (air carrier
percentage of annual boardings ; or
[ ] Project does not meet PFC eligibility (explain).
b. Comments:
*******************************************************************************************
10. ESTIMATED PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION DATE (Month and Year): 5192
ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE (Month and Year): 11199
All phases of the project were previously completed. This
amendment deals only with a PFC increase to cover the total debt on
the previously completed project. The Airport hopes to implement
the increase to $4.50 by January 1, 2002.
Revised 10/2100
*****FOR FAA
a. For IMPOSE AND USE or USE -ONLY project, project will begin within 2 years of 120-day
approval date? YES [ ] NO[ ]
b. For IMPOSE ONLY project, project will begin within 5 years of the charge effective date or
approval date, whichever is sooner? YES[ ] NO [ ]
c. Comments:
********************************************************************************************
11. For an IMPOSE ONLY project, estimated date USE application will be
submitted to the FAA (Month and Year): N/A. Project already completed.
*****FOR FAA USE**********************************************************************
a. Is the date within 3 years of the estimated charge effective date or approval date, whichever is
sooner? YES[ ] NO[ ].
b. Comments:
12. LIST CARRIERS CERTIFYING AGREEMENT:
SkyWest Airlines (Note: No other airline filed a certification of
agreement or disagreement.) 100% approval.
13. LIST CARRIERS CERTIFYING DISAGREEMENT:
None.
Recap of Disagreements:
Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding:
*****FOR FAA USE**********************************************************************
a. Comments:
14. FINANCING PLAN:
PFC FUNDS: Pay-as-you-go $ 667,500 (Administration cost & Amendment #2
preparation cost)
Bond Capital $33,915,518
Bond Financing &Interest $ 42,300,161. (Note: Three separate bond
issues.)
*** SUBTOTAL PFC FUNDS: $ 76,883,179.
EXISTING AIP FUNDS:
Grant # Grant Funds in Project $
A!P 3-06-0181-24 $1,722,584 - Creative Financing Grant
A!P 3-06-0181-26 $3,165,730 - Terminal Ramp/Utilities/Generator
W=_ oftIVArI1]
*** SUBTOTAL EXISTING AIP FUNDS: $4,888,314
ANTICIPATED AIP FUNDS (List Each Year Separately): N/A
Fiscal Year: Entitlement $ Discretionary $ Total $
N/A
*** SUBTOTAL ANTICIPATED AIP FUNDS: $
OTHER FUNDS:
State Grants $N/A
Local Funds $543,146
Other (please specify) $N/A
*** SUBTOTAL OTHER FUNDS: $ 543,146.
*** TOTAL PROJECT COST: $ 82,314,639.
The following two spreadsheets demonstrate projected PFC
collections (Attachment 1), beginning in January 2002, and the pay
down of the three separate bond issues (Attachment 2). Please note
that the 1998 bonds have early redemption allowances, which
provide that as fast as PFC's are collected, bonds can be called out
Note that projections show actual debt retirement in 2023, the
remaining PFC collection is to reimburse the Airport for debt that will
be paid in years 2001 through 2008 from Airline rates and charges
and for administrative costs.
Revised 1012100
ATTACHMENT #1 TO ITEM 14
CITY OF PALM SPRINGS
CALCULATION OF PASSENGER FACILITY CHARGES
BASED ON $4.50
Enplaned
Passenger
Forecast
1993
427,170
1994
474,859
1995
469.662
1996
543,951
1997
560,747
1998
602,803
1999
663,083
2000
622,038
2001
620,000
2002
628.258
2003
637,682
2004
653,624
2005
673,233
2006
693,430
2007
714,233
2008
735,660
2009
757,730
2010
780,462
2011
803,875
2012
819,953
2013
836,352
2014
853,079
2015
870.141
2016
878.842
2017
887,631
2018
896,507
2019
905,472
2020
914,527
2021
923,672
2022
932,909
2023
942,238
2024
951,660
Adjusted
% PFC Enplaned PFC
Growth Eligible Passengers Rate
0.0%
1.3%
1.5%
2.5%
3.0%
3.0%
3.0%
3.0%
3.0%
3.0%
3.0%
2.0%
2.0%
2.0%
2.0%
1.0%
1.0%
1.0%
1.0%
1.0%
1.0%
1.0%
1.0%
1.0%
80.0%
80.0%
80.0%
80.0%
80.0%
80.0%
80.0%
80.0%
80.0%
80.0%
80.0%
80.0%
80.0%
80.0%
80.0`3'o
80.0%
80.0%
80.0%
80.0%
80.0%
80.0%
80.0%
80.0%
80,00/6
80.0%
497,630
49G,000
502,600
510,100
522,900
538,600
554,700
571,400
588,500
606,200
624,400
643,100
656,000
6G9,100
682,500
696,100
703,100
710,100
717,200
724.400
731,600
738,900
746,300
753,800
761,300
PFC's collected @ $3.00 $11,615,147
PFC's collected @ $4.50 65,268,032
$76,883,179
Note: Assumes $4.50 collection
begins January 2002.
2.92
3.86
4.42
4.42
4.42
4.42
4.42
4.42
4.42
4.42
4.42
4.42
4.42
4.42
4.42
4.42
4.42
4.42
4.42
4.42
4.42
4.42
4.42
4.42
4.42
Total
PFC
Revenues
870,509
1,287.524
1,149,224
1,448,382
1,527,494
1,554,740
1,G00,033
1.453,081
1,916.320
2,221.492
2.254,642
2,311,218
2,380,612
2,451,774
2,525.588
2.601,170
2,679,404
2,759.848
2,842,502
2,899,520
2,957,422
3,016,650
3,076,762
3.107,702
3,138,642
3,170,024
3,201,848
3,233,672
3,265,938
3.298.646
3,331,796
1,349.000
Cumulative
PFC
Revenues
870,509
2,158,033
3.307,257
4,755,639
6.283.133
7,837,873
9,437,906
10,890,987
12,807,307
15,028,799
17.283.441
19,594,659
21,975,271
24,427,045
26,952.633
29.553,803
32,233,207
34,993.055
37.835,557
40,735,077
43,692,499
46,709,149
49.785,911
52,893,613
56,032,255
59,202,279
62,404,127
65,637,799
68,903,737
72,202,383
75,534,179
76.883,179
ATTACHMENT 2 TO ITEM 14
CITY OF PALM SPRINGS
PASSENGER FACILITY CHARGE REVENUES APPLIED TO DEBT SERVICE
(INCREASED PFC TO $4.50)
1998 PFC Bonds
Apply to
GARBS
GARBS DS
Debt Service on
Special
Available
Debt Service on
Early
Remaining
Payable from
EFC:
RPvinne
I qq8 PM Rands,*
$eclemplion
for GARBS
C:ARRS**
Redemption
EFfs
Rates and Chgs
2001
1.916,320
(846,250)
-
1,070,070
(1,070,070)
-
-
693,954
2002
2.221,492
(847,113)
1.374.380
(1,374,380)
-
390,542
2003
2.254,642
(847.378)
-
1,407265
(1,407.265)
-
356,979
2004
2.311,218
(846,918)
-
1,464,301
(1,464.301)
-
297,413
2005
2,380,612
(845,768)
-
1,534,845
(1,534,845)
-
-
227.359
2006
2,451,774
(848,790)
-
1.602,984
(1,602,984)
-
-
155.997
2007
2,525,588
(845,963)
-
1,679,626
(1,679,626)
-
-
84,103
2008
2,601,170
(847,403)
-
1,753.768
(1,753.768)
-
-
12,341
2009
2,679,404
(847,818)
-
1,831,587
(1,761,004)
(70,583)
-
-
2010
2,759,848
(847,193)
-
1,912,656
(1,763,704)
(148,952)
-
-
2011
2,842,502
(845,818)
-
1,996.685
(1,763,804)
(232.881)
-
-
2012
2,899,520
(848.390)
-
2,051,130
(1,761,186)
(289,944)
-
-
2013
2,957,422
(849,728)
-
2,107,694
(i,760,688)
(347,006)
-
-
2014
3,016,650
(845,125)
-
2,171,525
(1,767,291)
(404,234)
-
-
2015
3,076,762
(849.497)
2,227,265
(1,760,553)
(466,712)
-
-
2016
3,107,702
(847,716)
2259,986
(1,760.775)
(499,211)
-
-
2017
3,138,642
(844,909)
(393,613)
1,900,120
(1,762,528)
(137,592)
-
-
2018
3,170,024
(845,950)
(488,642)
1,835,432
(1,760,513)
(74,920)
-
-
2019
3,201,848
(845,394)
(520,024)
1.836,430
(1,759.388)
(77.043)
-
2020
3,233.672
(848,094)
(551,848)
1.833,730
(1,764,013)
(69,718)
-
-
2021
3,265.938
(849,219)
(583,672)
1,833.047
(1,764,119)
(68,929)
-
-
'022
3,298,646
(848,769)
(615,938)
1,833,939
(1,759,406)
(74,533)
-
-
-023
3,331,796
(845,963)
(648,646)
1,837,188
(300,000)
-
1,537,188
-
2024
1,349,000
-
-
1,349.000
-
-
1,349.000
-
Admin Costs @ 30,000/yr
660,000
PFC Amend#2 Cost to Prepare
7,500
Totals
2.886.188
2.886,188
* PFC Debt Service Adjusted for any Special Redemptions
** GARB Debt Service Adjusted for any Early Redemptions, includes debt
from 1992 issue and the 1998 issue.
***PROJECT REQUESTING PFC FUNDING LEVELS OF $4.00 AND $4.50:
a. Project costs cannot be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be
available through AIP funding. YES [X ] NO [ ] The only costs remaining, as
the project is completed and Financed, is annual administration costs and
debt service; neither of which is eligible for an AIP grant.
b. If the FAA determines that the project may qualify for AIP funding, the public
agency would prefer that the FAA approve the amount of the local match to be
collected at a $4.50 PFC level [ X] OR the entire requested amount at a $3.00
PFC level [ ].
c. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made
adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including
runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. YES L ] NO [ ] NIA [ ]
d. Comments.
*****FOR FAA
a. Does the project include a proposed LOP YES [ ] NO [ ] If YES, does the Region support?
YES [ ] NO [ ]. If YES, list the schedule for implementation:
b. For any proposed AIP discretionary funds, does the Region intend to support? YES [ ] NO [
l
c. For any proposed AIP funds, is the request within the planning levels for the Region's five year
CIP? YES( ] NO[ ]
d. For project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50:
Project costs cannot be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP
funding. YES[ ] NO[ ]
Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision
for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft
gates. YES[ ] NO[ ] NIA [ ]
e. Comments.
********************************************************************************************
15. BACK-UP FINANCING PLAN:
Continue to operate under existing $3.00 PFC approval, raise airline
raes and charges, and hope for increased non -airline revenues.
*****FOR FAA USE**********************************************************************
a. 1s the back-up financing/phasing plan viable? Yes [ ] No [ ].
b. Comments:
*****FOR FAA
ADOIRO RECOMMENDATION: Approve [ ] Partially Approve [ ] Disapprove [ ]
Revised 1012100
Obw
US Department
of Transportation
Federal Aviation
Administration
June 15, 1993
} FAA
.. �. Passenger Facility Charge
" AG'REF' #3122 AMEND 1
R18089, 5-5-93
Mr. Allen F. Smoot
Director of Aviation
Palm Springs Regional Airport
P.O. Box 2743
Palm Springs, CA 92263-2743
Dear Mr. Smoot:
Western -Pacific Region
RECEIVED
JUN 17 1993
DEPARTMENT OF
AVIATION
Palm Springs Regional Airport,
PFC 92-01-C-00-PSP
PFC Amendment No. 1
P.O Box 92007
worldway Postal Center
Los Angeles, CA 90009
Our office received notification on May 7, 1993 to amend PFC 92-01-C-00 PSP, as required under
Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR) Part 158.37, "Amendment of approved PFC". The notification
contains proposed amendments to:
1. Increase the total PFC revenue from $44,612,350 to $81,888,919_
2. Change the estimated expiration date from October 30, 2022 to October 30, 2032.
3. Modify from two projects (Terminal Expansion Phase IA and Terminal Expansion Phase 2) to a
single project with a ten year implementation program, 'Terminal Expansion".
We reviewed the documents to amend the PFC. for:
1. Evidence for notifying all the collecting carriers.
2. Evidence of consultation with the collecting carriers for the proposed amendments.
3. Either a written agreement or a no response by all the collecting carriers, with no disagreements
among them.
4. Justification for the proposed amendments.
Since all of the above four (4) items have been met under FAR 158.37 and we offered no comments
within 30 days of receiving notification, the PFC Amendment No. l becomes effective.
(� I o S5, s=S�3
FA
In your letter dated June 10, 1993 and received by our office on June 14, 1993, you sent a notification
to all the airlines that PFC Amendment No.I is effective on July 1, 1993.
The existing PFC number for your airport is PFC 92-0 1 -C-00-PSP. When PFC Amendment No.1
becomes effective, the PFC number changes to PFC 92-01-C-01-PSP. This number should be used for
all correspondence involving this PFC at your airport.
Sincerely,
John P. Oilligan
Supervisor, Standards Section
►t`J
U.S. Department
of Transportotion
Federal Aviation
Administration
JUN 2 5 In
Mr. Allen F. Smoot
Director of Aviation
City of Palm Springs
3400 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way
Palm Springs, CA 92262
Dear Mr. Smoot:
Office of the Administrator 800 Independence Ave S W
Washington, D C 20591
FAA - Record of Decision appr
PASSENGER FACILTIY CHARGE AT
Airprt $3 pr pssngr 30 yrs
AGREEMENT 3122 10-1-2022
Auth R17337 11-20-90 sign
1tr by FAA 6-25-92
In accordance with section 158.29 of the Federal Aviation
Regulations (Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 158),
the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has approved, in part,
your application to impose a passenger facility charge (PFC) at
Palm Springs Regional Airport (PSP) and to use PFC revenue at
PSP. The authority to impose a PFC is contingent on your
continued compliance with the terms of the regulation and any
conditions included in this letter.
Enclosed is a Record of Decision which provides specific
information about this approval including the approved PFC level,
total amount of approved net PFC revenue to be collected,
earliest charge effective date, and duration of authority to
impose the PFC. This Record also includes a list of projects
approved as well as the FAA's reasons for each decision. The
FAA's findings and determinations required by statute and
Part 158 along with the FAA's disposition of comments are also
included in the Record.
You are reminded of the reporting, recordkeeping, and auditing
requirements of Part 158, Subpart D. We request that you advise
our Western -Pacific Region Airports Division when you notify the
air carriers and foreign air carriers to begin collecting PFC's.
Also, you are responsible for coordinating any construction with
the appropriate Federal offices as you would with any
nonfederally funded construction.
Please note that you are required to begin implementing your
projects approved under this application within 2 years of this
date. Section 158.33 prohibits a public agency from imposing a
PFC for more than 2 years following approval to use PFC revenues,
unless the projects have been implemented.
The approval of any project which is proposed to include
Airport Improvement Program (AIP) discretionary funds is not
deemed a Federal commitment of AIP discretionary funds.
z
We have enclosed the list of advisory circulars with which you
must comply in accordance with your certification of assurance
number 9, standards and specifications.
Sincerely,
/J&4414.
Barry Lambert Harris
Acting Administrator
Enclosures
RECORD OF DECISION
CITY OF PALM SPRINGS
PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA
Application to impose a passenger facility charge (PFC) at
Palm Springs Regional Airport (PSP) and use PFC revenue at
PSP.
Approval Criteria
In accordance with section 158.29 of the Federal Aviation
Regulations (Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations,
Part 158), this Record of Decision includes decisions to
approve or disapprove, in whole or in part, imposition of a
PFC for use on two projects along with the following
determinations:
(1) The amount and duration of the PFC will not result
in revenue that exceeds amounts necessary to finance the
projects.
(2) Each project approved will achieve the objectives
set forth in section 158.15(a).
(3) Each project approved meets the criteria set forth
in section 158.15(b).
(4) The collection process, including any request by
the city of Palm Springs not to require a class or classes
of carriers to collect PFC's, is reasonable, not arbitrary,
nondiscriminatory, and otherwise in compliance with the law.
(5) The city of Palm Springs has not been found to be
in violation of sections 9304(e) or 9307 of the Airport
Noise and Capacity Act of 1990.
(6) All project -related requirements pertaining to the
airport layout plan (ALP), airspace studies, and
environmental analysis and approval have been met.
Procedural History
The city of Palm Springs met with air carriers operating at
the airport on January 21, 1992, to discuss the proposed
projects and other aspects of the draft PFC application. On
February 27, 1992, the FAA received a PFC application from
the city of Palm Springs to impose a $3 PFC at PSP and to
collect a total of $51,400,000 over a period of approximately
30 years. On March 16, 1992, the FAA determined this
application to be substantially complete within the
requirements of section 158.25. A notice was placed in the
Federal ---Register on
on this application.
April 27, 1992.
Amount of PFC
F,
March 27, 1992, inviting public comment
The period for public comment closed on
Level of PFC: $3.00
Total approved net PFC revenue: $44,612,350
Earliest charge effective date: October 1, 1992
The total approved net PFC revenue includes bond -associated
debt service and financing costs for the PFC portion of the
projects to be financed through bonds. Any excess PFC
revenue collected under debt servicing requirements shall be
used for the approved projects or retirement of outstanding
PFC-financed bonds. The total approved net PFC revenue does
not include air carrier compensation costs.
October 1, 1992, is the "earliest" charge effective date. In
establishing its charge effective date, the city of Palm Springs
must comply with section 158.43(b)(3), which states, in
part, that the charge effective date will be the first day
of a month which is at least 60 days from the date the
public agency notifies the carriers of approval to impose
the PFC.
Duration of Authority to Impose a PFC
The city of Palm Springs is -authorized to impose a PFC at
Palm Springs Regional Airport until the earliest of:
(1) 30 years from the charge effective date, or (2) the date
on which the total PFC revenue collected plus interest
thereon equals the allowable cost of the approved projects.
For this approval, that amount is $44,612,350. Based on
information submitted by the city of Palm Springs, the FAA
estimates the charge expiration date to be June 1, 2019.
Approved Projects
Approved
Project # Description Amount
1 Airport Terminal Expansion $400,000
Phase IA
This project involves improvements and additions
(approximately 43,158 square feet) to the existing terminal
building. Projects include:
a) expansion of the baggage claim area with more and larger
claim devices (PFC funds are requested only for this portion
of the project);
b) installation of temporary holdroom areas serving as
nonexclusive passenger boarding gates;
3
c) construction of an air-conditioned holdroom area
convenient to the nonexclusive boarding gates supporting
commuter and charter operations;
d) a centralized control center for airport operations and
the access control system;
e) remodeling of existing public -use areas of the terminal,
including asbestos removal and seismic reinforcing in
selected areas of existing terminal;
f) installation of a new passenger screening security
check point;
g) construction of an air carrier apron for three additional
parking positions and a commuter aircraft apron for four
additional parking positions; and
h) construction of six new passenger boarding gates,
increasing the capacity at PSP from 10 to 16 total gates.
Determination: The portion of the terminal expansion to be
funded with PFC funds, baggage claim expansion, is Airport
Improvement Program (AIP) eligible and will enhance
capacity. The public agency is requesting PFC funds to fund
a portion of the entire project. The total project cost
including financing is $37,974,400. Any environmental,
airspace, and ALP requirements have been met.
2 Airport Terminal Expansion $44,212,350
Phase IIA
This project will add 63,121 square feet of nonexclusive use
space, including:
a) install air-conditioned two -level concourse and
holdrooms;
b) construct second level boarding areas;
c) install eight boarding bridges; and
d) construct open-air patio for holding additional
passengers during good weather.
Determination: Terminal expansion is AIP eligible for
public -use areas and PFC eligible for public -use areas and
for construction of gates and related areas. The project
will preserve and enhance capacity and encourage
competition. The city of Palm Springs has stated that it
intends to issue approximately $13.8 million in revenue
bonds, to be repaid over a 30-year period, to finance the
eligible construction costs for this project. The approved
amount represents the financing costs for the bond issue.
4
Additional phase IIA costs may be funded through AIP grants.
Any environmental, airspace, and ALP requirements have
been met.
Environmental Recruirements
The projects approved in this application are categorically
excluded from the requirement for formal environmental
assessment under FAA Order 5050.4A, Airports Environmental
Handbook, paragraph 23 (1985). There appear to be no
extraordinary circumstances requiring individual review.
Collection Process
a. Exclusion of a class of carriers. The city of
Palm Springs has requested that Part 135 air taxi
operations not be required to collect PFC's.
Determination: Approved. Based on information
submitted in the city of Palm Springs' application,
the FAA has determined that the proposed class
accounts for less than 1 percent of PSP's total
annual enplanements. The city of Palm Springs
should confirm, on an annual basis using prior year
enplanement data, that this class does not exceed
1 percent of the total enplanements at PSP.
b. Compliance with the regulation.
(1) The requested charge effective date,
October 1, 1992, complies with the requirements of
section 158.43(b)(3) and is approved. The city of
Palm Springs is cautioned that to retain this date
it must comply with the requirements of
section 158.43(b)(3) which states that "the charge
effective date ... will be the first day of the month
which is at least 60 days from the date the public
agency notifies the carriers of approval to impose
the PFC." (Emphasis added.)
(2) The city of Palm Springs requests a collection
period of 30 years in its application. Based on
information submitted by the city of Palm Springs,
the FAA estimates the duration of collection to be
approximately 26 years, 8 months.
(3) Except as specifically mentioned above, all
other aspects of the proposed collection process
have been determined to be reasonable, not
arbitrary, nondiscriminatory, and otherwise in
compliance with the regulation.
5
Compliance with the Airport Noise and Capacity Act of 1990 (ANCA)
The FAA is not aware of any proposal at PSP which would be
found to be in violation of ANCA. The FAA herein provides
notice to the city of Palm Springs that a restriction on the
operation of aircraft at PSP must comply with all applicable
provisions of ANCA and that failure to comply with ANCA and
Part 161 makes the city of Palm Springs subject to
provisions of Subpart F of that part. Subpart F, "Failure
to Comply with This Part," describes the procedures to
terminate eligibility for AIP funds and authority to collect
PFC revenues.
Federal Register Notice Comments
The FAA received comments from the Air Transport Association (ATA),
America West Airlines, Alaska Airlines, and the city of Palm
Springs, as a result of the Federal Register notice of
intent to rule on the application. The ATA attached copies
of the written certifications of agreement or disagreement
from American, Delta, Trans World, and United. These
carriers, along with America West and Alaska, unanimously
recommend approval of the terminal expansion projects.
Many of the carriers also submitted comments on the "backup"
projects submitted by the city of Palm Springs. Part 158
does not provide for submission of backup projects for an
impose and use application and so the FAA will not rule on
these projects in this decision.
The ATA and Delta expressed concern about the form,
covenants, and conditions of any general airport revenue
bonds (GARB) issued to finance the terminal projects. The
city of Palm Springs, in its response to the Federal Register
notice, vigorously objects to the perceived proposal that
the FAA place conditions on the issuance of these GARB's.
The FAA will not place specific conditions on the issuance
of a GARB; however, if implementation of the approved
project is not begun within 2 years of the date of this
approval, the city of Palm Springs will be subject to the
provisions of Subpart E, "Termination."
0
Legal Authority
This decision is made under the authority of sections 1006
and 1113 of the Federal Aviation Act, as amended, 49 U.S.C.
App. 1486 and 1513. This decision constitutes a final
agency order approving in part and disapproving in part the
city of Palm Springs' application for authority to impose
and use a PFC at PSP. Any party to this proceeding having a
substantial interest may appeal the order to the courts of
appeals of the United States or the United States Court of
Appeals for the District of Columbia upon petition, filed
within 60 days after issuance of this decision.
/A".
concur JUN 2 5 W2
Nonconcur
Acting Administrator, AOA-1 Date
Acting Administrator, AOA-1 Date
CURRENT FAA ADVISORY CIRCULARS FOR PFC PROJECTS
Effective Date, 2-26-92
NUMBER SUBJECT
70/7460 .1H
Obstruction Marking and Lighting
CHG 1
150 '200-.'30A
Airport Winter Safety and Operations
CHG 1
1506210-513
Painting, Marking and Lighting of Vehicles Used on an Airport
150/5210-14
Airport Fire and Rescue Personnel Protective Clothing
15015220-IOA
Guide Specification for Water/Foam Type Aircraft Rescue and Firefighting Vehicles
150/5220-13B
Runway Surface Condition Sensor Specification Guide
150/5220-14A
Airport Fire and Rescue Vehicle Specification Guide
150/5220-16
Automated Weather Observing Systems for Nonfederal Applications
150/5220-17A
Design Standards for Aircraft Rescue Firefighting Training Facilities
150/5300--13
Airport Design
CHG 1&2
150/5320-6C
Airport Pavement Design and Evaluation
CHG 1&2
15015320-128
Measurement, Construction, and Maintenance of Skid Resistant Airport Pavement Surfaces
150r5320-15
Management of Airport Industrial Waste
150/5340-iF
Marking of Paved Areas on Airports
CHG 1
150/5340-4C
Installation Details for Runway Centerline Touchdown Zone Lighting Systems
CHG 1&2
15015340-68
Segmented Cinde Airport Marker System
CHG 1
150/5340-148
Economy Approach lighting Aids
CHG 1 & 2
150/5340-178
Standby Power for Non -FAA Airport lighting Systems
150/5340-18C
Standards for Airport Sign Systems
CHG 1
150/5340-19
Taxiway Centerline Lighting System
150/5340-21
Airport Miscellaneous Lighting Visual Aids
15015340-23B
Supplemental Wind Cones
150V5340-24
Runway and Taxiway Edge Lighting System
CHG 1
15O/5340-27A
Air -to --Ground Radio Control of Airport Lighting Systems
150/5345- 30
Specification for L--821 Panels for Remote Control of Airport Lighting
150/5345-10E
Specification for Constant Current Regulators Regulator Monitors
150/5345-12C
Specification for Airport and Heliport Beacon
150/5345-266
Specification for L-823 Plug and Receptacle, Cable Connectors
CHG i&2
150/5345 27C
Specification for Wind Cone Assemblies
150/5345-28D
Precision Approach Path Indicator (PAPI) Systems
CHG f
150/534529B
FAA Specification L-653, Runway and Taxiway Centerline Retroreflective Markers
CHG 1
150/5345-42C
Specification for Airport tight Bases, Transformer Housings, Junction Boxes and
Accessories
CHG f
15015345-43D
Specfication for Obstruction Lighting Equipment
150/5345--44E
Specification for Taxiway and Runway Signs
150/5345-45A
Lightweight Approach Light Structure
150/5345-46A
Specification for Runway and Taxiway Light Fixtures
CURREN'r FAA ADVISORY CIRCULARS FOR PI:C PROJECTS (continued)
Effective Date: 2-26-92
NUMBER SUBJECT
15015346--47A
Isolation Transformers for Airport Lighting Systems
150/5345-49A
Specification t�54, Radio Control Equipment
150/534551
Specification for Discharge -Type Flasher Equipment
CHG 1
150/5345-52
Generic Visual Glideslope Indicators (GVGQ
150/5370-2C
OperaWnal Safety on Airports During Construction
150/537C-IOA
Standards for Specifying Construction of Airports
CHG 1, 2, 3
15CV5390-2
Heliport Design
150/5390-3
Vertiport Design
CERTIFICATE OF PROPERTY INSURANCE
DATE (Nm/oo/vvvr) e p
07/06/2022
THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS
CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW.
THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER($), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
ei
`22
OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.
PRODUCER
AOn Risk Insurance Services west, Inc.
R.Fi Ci.RiT�D
Seattle wA office
CONTACT
d+l+
PHONE
Iwo No. E.t) (866) 283-R22
FAX
IaC Nui. (800) 363-0105
EMAaA
1420 Fifth Avenue
suite JUL 18 2022
Seattle 2wA 98101-4030 USA
y ,Sa9
C
'C
PRODUCER
CUSTOMER ID 5]0000089279
INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE
NAIC I
INSURED ice of t P City C)Prk
Alaska Airlines, inc.
P.O. Box 68900
INSURER A: Zurich American Ins CO
16535
6
'O
c
S
INSURER B:
INSURER C:
I INSURER D:
Seattle WA 98168-0977 USA
INSURER F:
LOCATION OF PREMISEBI DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY 1Allach ACORD 101, AddMlanal RameMa Schedule, ll mom apace N m9ulmd)
Re: Lease Agreement #A5060 - Palm Springs International Airport, 3400 TahquitZ-McCallum way, Palm Springs, CA.
The City of Palm Springs is included a$ Additional insured as required by written contract, but limited to the operations of the
insured under said contract, per the applicable endorsement with respect to the property policy and its interests in the Lease
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD
INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS
CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS,
EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.
INSR
LTR
TYPE OF INSURANCE
POLICY NUMBER
POLICY EFFECTIVE
DATE (MM/OD/YYYY)
POLICY EXPIRATION
DATE (MI
COVERED PROPERTY
LIMITS
A
X
VROPFRTY
OF LOSS
DEDUCTIBLES
PPR
0. 1/ pid
BUILDING
PERSONAL PROPERTY
BUSINESS INCOME
EXTRAEXPENSE
RENTALVALUE
BLANKET BUILDING
BLANKET PERS PROP
BLANKET BLDG a PP
CAUSES
BASIC
BUILDING
%
BROAD
SPECIAL
CONTENTS
EARTHQUAKE
WIND
FLOOD
X
$100.000.000
Wkl BBPP Dad
INLAND MARINE
OF LOSS
NAMED PERILS
TYPE OF POLICY
.
CAUSES
POLICY NUMBER
R
—
CRIME
TYPE OF POLICY
BOILER a MACHINERY I
EQUIPMENT BREAKDOWN
SPECIAL CONDITIONS, OTHER COVERAGES (ACORD 101, A Idltional Remaks schedule, may be allached it more space is required)
"All Risk" of Direct Physical Loss or Damage including Flood, Earth movement and as further described in the approved policy
form, and excluding Equipment Breakdown/Boiler & machinery.
CERTI
City of Palm Springs
Attn: City Clerk
3200 E. TahquitZ Canyon way
,. I. P.O. Box 2743
Palm Springs CA 92263-2743 USA
SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION
DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY
PROVISIONS.
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE (_y/9
tX(OR ✓LARiil fl!(GiOfFGS VGLt4Led //RO( a�NG
® 1995-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved.
ACORD 24 (2016/03) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD
AGENCY CUSTOMER ID: 570000089279
LOC #:
ADDITIONAL REMARKS SCHEDULE
Page _ of _
AGENCY
NAMED INSURED
Aon Risk insurance services west, Inc.
Alaska Airlines, Inc.
POLICY NUMBER
See Certificate Number: 570094452290
CARRIER
NMC CODE
EFFECTIVE DATE:
See Certificate Number: 570094452290
1
ADDITIONAL REMARKS
THIS ADDITIONAL REMARKS FORM IS A SCHEDULE TO ACORD FORM,
FORM NUMBER: ACORD 24 FORM TITLE: Certificate of Property Insurance
LOCATION OF PREMISES I DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
Agreement. A waiver of subrogation is granted in favor of Certificate Holder as required by written contract
but limited to the operations of the insured under said contract, with respect to the property policy.
SPECIAL CONDITIONS I OTHER COVERAGES
ACORD 101 (2008/01) ® 2008 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved.
The ACORD neme and logo are registered marks of ACORD