HomeMy WebLinkAbout2003 - MINUTES - 4/9/2003 STUDY SESSIONSTUDY SESSION
CITY OF PALM SPRINGS
APRIL 9, 2003
CONVENE IN OPEN SESSION
A. Call to Order-Large Conference Room-Hodges absent
B. City Attorney Report on Matters Discussed in Closed Session-See Page 2 of
Agenda this date.
C. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Tom Kieley, Palm Springs, stated that Palm Springs Disposal Services has done
business in the City for a long time; that the company is a partner with the
Community; that it is accessible, willing to discuss issues and keeps the City
beautiful and added that the contract with PSDS should continue.
Mark Empy, representing Waste Management, stated that the City is in an
economic crunch and should consider an RFP for award of the contract.
Jim Brockman, Waste Resources Inc., requested no decision be made until a
private/public partnership between the City and Waste Resources could be
explored.
Joy Meredith, Crystal Fantasy, stated that the merchants in the downtown are
excited about the revamping of the streetscape in front of the Desert Fashion
Plaza.
D. COUNCIL COMMENTS/QUESTIONS/REPORTS
Councilmembers commented on various civic functions attended.
E. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS - None
F. STUDY SESSION
1. UPDATE ON CITY’S GOLF COURSES
Director of Finance & Treasurer reviewed a handout concerning the
financial status of the golf course, copy on file in Office of the City Clerk.
Arnold Palmer Management representatives reviewed a power point, copy
on file in Office of the City Clerk.
Council direction to renew the landscaping at the golf course; to review the
status of the financials of the golf course on a quarterly basis; and that
direction to increase the numbers to a positive side needs to be seen.
2. SOLID WASTE FRANCHISE
Assistant City Manager stated that an audit had been completed on the
hauler; that the findings were within range of other haulers; that direction
is needed to bring a renewal contract forward; that a term of 15 years is
being recommended and that it is believed that the Disposal Service
company is prepared to meet the challenges ahead.
City manager stated that it was originally thought that an RFP would be
best for the City; that the audit indicated a benchmark for the City to use;
that new terms have been negotiated with PSDS; that the rates have been
cut upwards of 16 to 17%; that the residents will have the choice on the
number of weekly pickups; and that the major deal points are agreeable.
City Attorney stated that the term may be too long at 15 years; that the
term could be for 10 years with 5-one year options; but that it does need to
be clear whether the optional years are locked in or not.
Council direction to bring a contract back to a regular meeting for
consideration for a term of 11 years, with 4 discretionary one-year term
options.
3. PROCLAMATION/RECOGNITION PROCEDURES
City Manager withdrew the item.
ADJOURN